arxiv: 2605.11562 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: no theorem link

A Generative AI Driven Interactive Narrative Serious Fame for Stress Relief and Its Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Ting-Chen Hsu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC

keywords serious gamesgenerative AIstress reliefinteractive narrativepilot studyemotion regulationUnityChatGPT

0 comments

The pith

A generative AI narrative game reduces self-reported stress in students after 14 days of play.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops Reverie, an interactive narrative serious game built in Unity and powered by ChatGPT to generate personalized story content for stress relief. It reports results from a 14-day pilot with 20 students experiencing moderate to high stress, where stress levels declined significantly and users showed gains in cognitive emotion regulation along with strong usability ratings. A sympathetic reader would care because stress is common and an engaging, adaptive digital tool might reach people who avoid conventional methods. The authors frame this as initial evidence for a broader design approach that embeds large language models into serious games to create responsive mental health interventions.

Core claim

The central claim is that a generative AI-driven interactive narrative game can serve as a feasible and effective stress-relief intervention, demonstrated by a pilot in which participants using Reverie exhibited a statistically significant cumulative drop in stress (p=0.016) over 14 days together with excellent user experience scores and associated improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies.

What carries the argument

Reverie, the Unity-based serious game that integrates ChatGPT to generate dynamic, personalized narrative elements tailored to user input for stress management.

If this is right

Repeated daily play yields a cumulative rather than one-time stress reduction.
The game produces high user-experience ratings when generative AI supplies narrative content.
Use of the game correlates with measurable shifts toward more adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the effect holds, such games could offer a scalable route to personalized stress support that does not require a human coach for each session.
The same generative-narrative pattern could be adapted to other mental-health targets such as anxiety or low mood.

Load-bearing premise

The measured drops in stress and gains in emotion regulation are produced by playing the game rather than by placebo effects, the simple passage of time, or other untracked influences.

What would settle it

A follow-up study that randomly assigns comparable stressed participants to either play Reverie daily for 14 days or to a no-game control condition and then compares pre-to-post stress score changes between the two groups.

read the original abstract

Background: Stress has become a widespread phenomenon, and serious games are increasingly recognized as engaging tools for stress relief. However, despite the rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI), its integration into stress-relief serious games remains insufficiently explored. Objective: This study aimed to address this gap by developing "Reverie", an Gen-AI driven serious game powered by the Unity engine and ChatGPT, and to preliminarily evaluate its effectiveness in stress reduction, user experience, and cognitive emotion regulation. Methods: A 14-day pilot study was conducted with 20 students experiencing moderate to high levels of stress. Participants used "Reverie" as a stress-relief intervention. Stress levels, user experience, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies were assessed to examine the game's feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Results: The results showed that "Reverie" significantly reduced participants' stress levels over the intervention period (p=.016*), indicating a cumulative positive effect. In addition, the game demonstrated excellent user experience and was associated with improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Conclusions: This study proposes a Gen-AI driven design framework for serious games for stress relief. Besides, this pilot study provides initial support for the feasibility and promise of combining LLM-driven gameplay in a personalized digital intervention context.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A concrete Unity+ChatGPT prototype for narrative stress games, tested in a small pre-post pilot that shows a stress drop but cannot attribute it to the game.

read the letter

The paper builds Reverie, a Unity game that uses ChatGPT to generate personalized interactive stories and characters for stress relief, then runs a 14-day pilot with 20 stressed students. They describe the system architecture, how prompts drive narrative branches, and report pre-post measures on stress, user experience, and emotion regulation strategies. The stress scores fell with p=.016 and UX came back strong, which is the main new piece: a working example of generative AI inside a serious game rather than just another static app. That implementation detail is useful for anyone trying to move beyond scripted content in mental health games. The pilot also shows the thing can be deployed to students without obvious technical breakdowns. The soft spot is the design itself. A single-arm pre-post study with n=20 cannot separate the game from time, repeated self-reporting, regression to the mean, or simple expectation effects. The abstract labels the drop a “cumulative positive effect,” but the data supply no counterfactual, so the causal claim stays weak. No control arm, no sham condition, and no blinding are described. This paper is for HCI and serious-games researchers who want an early, concrete case of LLM-driven narrative tools. It is not yet evidence that the approach reduces stress in any reliable way. A serious referee should see it. The technical description and feasibility data are solid enough to review, and referees can push the authors to tighten the methods or reframe the conclusions before any larger claim. I would not cite the efficacy result yet, but the system sketch could save someone else time.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the development of 'Reverie', a generative AI-driven interactive narrative serious game for stress relief implemented in Unity with ChatGPT integration. It reports results from a 14-day pilot study with 20 university students reporting moderate-to-high stress, in which participants used the game as an intervention; outcomes include a statistically significant reduction in stress levels (p=0.016), high user-experience ratings, and improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies. The authors propose a Gen-AI design framework for such games and interpret the findings as preliminary support for feasibility and efficacy in personalized digital stress-relief interventions.

Significance. If the observed changes can be attributed to the intervention, the work would offer an early demonstration of LLM integration into narrative serious games for mental health, potentially informing scalable, personalized approaches. The pilot supplies useful feasibility data on engagement and self-reported outcomes that could guide subsequent controlled trials. However, the single-arm design substantially weakens causal claims, so the contribution is primarily methodological and exploratory rather than definitive evidence of effectiveness.

major comments (3)

[Title and Methods] Title and Methods section: The title explicitly calls the work a 'Randomized Controlled Pilot Study,' yet the abstract and methods describe a single-arm, pre-post design with no randomization, control group, sham condition, or wait-list arm. This is load-bearing for the central efficacy claim because the reported stress reduction (p=.016) and 'cumulative positive effect' cannot be isolated from time effects, regression to the mean, repeated self-report bias, or placebo; the manuscript must either revise the title and claims or add a control arm.
[Results] Results section (stress-reduction analysis): The interpretation that the p=.016 finding demonstrates the game's 'cumulative positive effect' is not supported by the design; with n=20 and no between-group comparison, the paper should report the exact statistical test used, effect size, and a limitations paragraph that explicitly lists alternative explanations rather than attributing the change to Reverie.
[Results and Discussion] Results and Discussion (emotion-regulation outcomes): The claim of 'associated with improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies' lacks detail on which specific strategies changed, the magnitude of change, or statistical tests; without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the improvement is clinically meaningful or merely correlated with time.

minor comments (3)

[Title] Title contains an apparent typo: 'Serious Fame' should read 'Serious Game'.
[Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract states the study examined 'feasibility and preliminary efficacy' but the title and conclusions use stronger language; align wording for consistency.
[Game Design] Provide more technical detail on how ChatGPT was prompted and integrated into the Unity narrative to allow replication.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback. We agree with the concerns about the title and the need for greater precision in reporting and interpreting results given the single-arm design. We will make the revisions outlined below to address each point.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Title and Methods] Title and Methods section: The title explicitly calls the work a 'Randomized Controlled Pilot Study,' yet the abstract and methods describe a single-arm, pre-post design with no randomization, control group, sham condition, or wait-list arm. This is load-bearing for the central efficacy claim because the reported stress reduction (p=.016) and 'cumulative positive effect' cannot be isolated from time effects, regression to the mean, repeated self-report bias, or placebo; the manuscript must either revise the title and claims or add a control arm.

Authors: We agree that the title is inaccurate and does not reflect the study design. The work is a single-arm pilot study. We will revise the title to 'A Generative AI Driven Interactive Narrative Serious Game for Stress Relief and Its Pilot Study' and update all claims in the abstract, introduction, results, and discussion to accurately describe the pre-post design without implying randomization or a control condition. Because the study has already been completed, adding a control arm is not possible; instead, we will strengthen the limitations section to explicitly note that observed changes cannot be causally attributed to the intervention. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results section (stress-reduction analysis): The interpretation that the p=.016 finding demonstrates the game's 'cumulative positive effect' is not supported by the design; with n=20 and no between-group comparison, the paper should report the exact statistical test used, effect size, and a limitations paragraph that explicitly lists alternative explanations rather than attributing the change to Reverie.

Authors: We will report the precise statistical test (paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on normality), the exact p-value, and an effect size (Cohen's d or equivalent). We will remove the phrase 'cumulative positive effect' and rephrase the results to state that stress levels decreased over the 14-day period. A new limitations paragraph will be added that lists alternative explanations including time effects, regression to the mean, repeated self-report bias, and placebo effects, making clear that the design does not permit attribution to the game itself. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and Discussion] Results and Discussion (emotion-regulation outcomes): The claim of 'associated with improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies' lacks detail on which specific strategies changed, the magnitude of change, or statistical tests; without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the improvement is clinically meaningful or merely correlated with time.

Authors: We will expand the Results section to specify which cognitive emotion regulation strategies (from the CERQ) showed statistically significant changes, report the corresponding p-values and effect sizes, and note the direction and magnitude of each change. In the Discussion we will address clinical meaningfulness and the possibility that changes may be time-related rather than intervention-driven, consistent with the single-arm design. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical pilot study with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper reports results from a 14-day single-arm pilot study (n=20) evaluating a Gen-AI serious game for stress relief. It presents direct observational measurements of pre-post stress scores (p=.016), user experience ratings, and emotion regulation changes without any equations, parameter fitting, predictions derived from models, uniqueness theorems, or self-citation chains. All claims reduce to the collected data and statistical tests performed on that data; no step equates a claimed output to its own inputs by construction. This is a standard empirical report whose validity questions (e.g., lack of control arm) lie outside circularity analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on assumptions about the reliability of self-report measures in psychological research and the ability of a short-term intervention to produce measurable changes in stress.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Self-reported stress levels and emotion regulation strategies accurately reflect participants' internal states.
The study relies on questionnaires for stress and cognitive emotion regulation without objective measures.
domain assumption The 14-day intervention period is sufficient to observe cumulative effects on stress.
The design assumes changes over 14 days are due to the game.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5527 in / 1380 out tokens · 61959 ms · 2026-05-13T01:30:55.005946+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Ghasemi, D.Q

F. Ghasemi, D.Q. Beversdorf, K.C. Herman, Stress and stress responses: a narrative literature review from physiological mechanisms to intervention approaches, J. Pac. Rim Psychol. 18 (2024) 18344909241289222

work page 2024
[2]

Mehta, M.M

M. Mehta, M.M. Singh, S.K. Gupta, A. Kushal, Study of stress among health care professionals: a systemic review, Int. J. Res. Found. Hosp. Healthc. Adm. 6 (1) (2018) 6-11

work page 2018
[3]

Prilleltensky, M

I. Prilleltensky, M. Neff, A. Bessell, Teacher stress: what it is, why it's important, how it can be alleviated, Theory Pract. 55 (2) (2016) 104-111

work page 2016
[4]

Amanvermez, M

Y. Amanvermez, M. Rahmadiana, E. Karyotaki, L. de Wit, D.D. Ebert, R.C. Kessler, et al., Stress management interventions for college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 30 (4) (2023) 423

work page 2023
[5]

Williams, J

S.E. Williams, J. Cumming, G.M. Balanos, The use of imagery to manipulate challenge and threat appraisal states in athletes, J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 32 (3) (2010) 339-358

work page 2010
[6]

Chlap, R

N. Chlap, R. Brown, Relationships between workplace characteristics, psychological stress, affective distress, burnout and empathy in lawyers, Int. J. Legal Prof. 29 (2) (2022) 159-180

work page 2022
[7]

Chrousos, Stress and disorders of the stress system, Nat

G.P. Chrousos, Stress and disorders of the stress system, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5 (7) (2009) 374-381

work page 2009
[8]

Tomaka, J

J. Tomaka, J. Blascovich, J. Kibler, J.M. Ernst, Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73 (1) (1997) 63

work page 1997
[9]

Reichenberg, J.H

A. Reichenberg, J.H. MacCabe, Feeling the pressure: work stress and mental health, Psychol. Med. 37 (8) (2007) 1073-1074

work page 2007
[10]

Reddy, K.R

K.J. Reddy, K.R. Menon, A. Thattil, Academic stress and its sources among university students, Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 11 (1) (2018) 531-537

work page 2018
[11]

Aneshensel, Social stress: theory and research, Annu

C.S. Aneshensel, Social stress: theory and research, Annu. Rev. Sociol. 18 (1) (1992) 15-38

work page 1992
[12]

Conger, M.A

R.D. Conger, M.A. Rueter, G.H. Elder Jr., Couple resilience to economic pressure, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76 (1) (1999) 54

work page 1999
[13]

Weber, K

D. Weber, K. O’Brien, Cancer and cancer-related fatigue and the interrelationships with depression, stress, and inflammation, J. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 22 (3) (2017) 502-512

work page 2017
[14]

Nixon, D.D

P. Nixon, D.D. Ebert, L. Boß, P. Angerer, N. Dragano, D. Lehr, The efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention for employees experiencing adverse working conditions and occupational self-efficacy as a mediator: randomized controlled trial, J. Med. Internet Res. 24 (10) (2022) e40488

work page 2022
[15]

Trudel, M

X. Trudel, M. Gilbert-Ouimet, M. Vézina, D. Talbot, B. Mâsse, A. Milot, et al., Effectiveness of a workplace intervention reducing psychosocial stressors at work on blood pressure and hypertension, Occup. Environ. Med. 78 (10) (2021) 738-744

work page 2021
[16]

Cozzolino, D.R

M. Cozzolino, D.R. Vivo, L. Girelli, P. Limone, G. Celia, The evaluation of a mind-body intervention (MBT-T) for stress reduction in academic settings: a pilot study, Behav. Sci. 10 (8) (2020) 124

work page 2020
[17]

Eneogu, C.K

N.D. Eneogu, C.K. Ugwuanyi, C.S. Ugwuanyi, Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy on academic stress among rural community secondary school economics students: a A generative AI driven interactive narrative serious game for stress relief and its randomized controlled pilot study *Email: tingchenhsu.ac@gmail.com; 13 randomized controlled evaluation, J. R...

work page 2024
[18]

Khurshid, R

K. Khurshid, R. Mushtaq, U. Rauf, N. Anwar, Q. Abbas, S. Aljhani, et al., Cognitive behavior therapy for academic burnout, procrastination, self-handicapping behavior, and test anxiety among adolescents: a randomized control trial, BMC Psychol. 13 (1) (2025) 94

work page 2025
[19]

Evriani, N.A

T. Evriani, N.A. Fardana, How does the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy in reducing academic anxiety influence the academic procrastination of undergraduate students? Buana Pendidikan 20 (1) (2024) 22-28

work page 2024
[20]

Z. Li, R. Yao, S.H. Cho, Economic insecurity, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms: a longitudinal study on mental health, Appl. Res. Qual. Life 20 (4) (2025) 1611-1628

work page 2025
[21]

Space From Money Worries

T. Richardson, A. Enrique, C. Earley, A. Adegoke, D. Hiscock, D. Richards, The acceptability and initial effectiveness of “Space From Money Worries”: an online cognitive behavioral therapy intervention to tackle the link between financial difficulties and poor mental health, Front. Public Health 10 (2022) 739381

work page 2022
[22]

Tang, Q.X

L. Tang, Q.X. Liu, Y. He, H. Peng, M. Luo, H. Zheng, et al., Systematic interventions based on the stress-induced situation, affective, bodily, and cognitive reactions framework to mitigate psychological distress in lung cancer patients post-thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial, Front. Psychol. 16 (2025) 1511622

work page 2025
[23]

Stagl, S.C

J.M. Stagl, S.C. Lechner, C.S. Carver, L.C. Bouchard, L.M. Gudenkauf, D.R. Jutagir, et al., A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral stress management in breast cancer: survival and recurrence at 11-year follow-up, Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 154 (2) (2015) 319-328

work page 2015
[24]

Omeke, M.O

F.C. Omeke, M.O. Ede, C.L. Chukwu, P.N. Aroh, C.O. Onyeanusi, T.O. Ozor, et al., Can REBT reduce academic stress and increase adjustment in rural students? J. Ration. Emot. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 42 (4) (2024) 699-721

work page 2024
[25]

Puolakanaho, R

A. Puolakanaho, R. Lappalainen, P. Lappalainen, J.S. Muotka, R. Hirvonen, K.M. Eklund, et al., Reducing stress and enhancing academic buoyancy among adolescents using a brief web-based program based on acceptance and commitment therapy: a randomized controlled trial, J. Youth Adolesc. 48 (2) (2019) 287-305

work page 2019
[26]

Yin, K.S

Y. Yin, K.S. Ko, The effect of group art therapy on acculturative and academic stress of Chinese graduate students in South Korea, Front. Psychol. 14 (2023) 1179778

work page 2023
[27]

Gallego-Gómez, S

J.I. Gallego-Gómez, S. Balanza, J. Leal-Llopis, J.A. García-Méndez, J. Oliva-Pérez, J. Doménech-Tortosa, et al., Effectiveness of music therapy and progressive muscle relaxation in reducing stress before exams and improving academic performance in nursing students: a randomized trial, Nurse Educ. Today 84 (2020) 104217

work page 2020
[28]

Granic, A

I. Granic, A. Lobel, R.C. Engels, The benefits of playing video games, Am. Psychol. 69 (1) (2014) 66

work page 2014
[29]

Reinecke, Games and recovery: the use of video and computer games to recuperate from stress and strain, J

L. Reinecke, Games and recovery: the use of video and computer games to recuperate from stress and strain, J. Media Psychol. 21 (3) (2009) 126-142

work page 2009
[30]

E. Usta, M. Inozu, The use of serious games in psychological interventions for anxiety disorders and related psychopathologies: a systematic review, Curr. Psychol. 43 (2024) 12610-12633

work page 2024
[31]

S. Lu, S. Ni, T. Bai, Promoting migrant adolescent resilience through a virtual reality videogame: a randomized trial, Res. Soc. Work Pract. (2025) 10497315251342210

work page 2025
[32]

J. Zhan, C. Liu, Z. Wang, Z. Cai, J. He, Effects of game-based digital interventions for mental disorders: a meta-analysis, J. Affect. Disord. 362 (2024) 731–741

work page 2024
[33]

Van Rooij, A

M. Van Rooij, A. Lobel, O. Harris, N. Smit, I. Granic, DEEP: a biofeedback virtual reality game for children at-risk for anxiety, in: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016, pp. 1989-1997

work page 2016
[34]

Zeiler, S

M. Zeiler, S. Vögl, U. Prinz, N. Werner, G. Wagner, A. Karwautz, N. Zeller, L. Ackermann, K. Waldherr, Game Design, Effectiveness, and Implementation of Serious Games Promoting Mental Health Literacy in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review, JMIR Mental Health 12 (2025) e67418

work page 2025
[35]

Mohamad Yahaya, D.R

N.A. Mohamad Yahaya, D.R. Awang Rambli, S. Sulaiman, F. Merienne, E. Alyan, Design of game-based virtual forests for psychological stress therapy. Forests 14(2) (2023) 288

work page 2023
[36]

Pallavicini, E

F. Pallavicini, E. Orena, L. Arnoldi, F. Achille, S. Stefanini, M. Cassa, et al., Effects and acceptability of a 1-week home-based virtual reality training for supporting the management of stress and anxiety: randomized pilot trial, JMIR Serious Games 13(1) (2025) e50326

work page 2025
[37]

Heng, J.S.Y

Y.K. Heng, J.S.Y. Liew, M.F.I.L. Abdullah, Y. Tang, N. Prestopnik, ReWIND: a CBT-based serious game to improve cognitive emotion regulation and anxiety disorder, Int. J. Serious Games 10 (3) (2023) 43-65

work page 2023
[38]

T.C. Hsu, Z. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Designing More Engaging Serious Games to Support Students’ Mental Health: A Pilot Study Based on A CBT-Informed Design Framework, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15662, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[39]

Sengar, A.B

S.S. Sengar, A.B. Hasan, S. Kumar, F. Carroll, Generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review and applications, Multimed. Tools Appl. 84 (21) (2025) 23661-23700

work page 2025
[40]

Zhang, J

Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Mai, A comprehensive overview of generative AI (Gen-AI): technologies, applications, and challenges, Neurocomputing (2025) 129645

work page 2025
[41]

Ashkinaze, J

J. Ashkinaze, J. Mendelsohn, Q. Li, C. Budak, E. Gilbert, How AI ideas affect the creativity, diversity, and evolution of human ideas: evidence from a large, dynamic experiment, in: Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference, 2025, pp. 198-213

work page 2025
[42]

R. Deng, M. Jiang, X. Yu, Y. Lu, S. Liu, Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies, Comput. Educ. 227 (2025) 105224

work page 2025
[43]

Doshi, O.P

A.R. Doshi, O.P. Hauser, Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content, Sci. Adv. 10 (28) (2024) eadn5290

work page 2024
[44]

Paananen, J

V. Paananen, J. Oppenlaender, A. Visuri, Using text-to-image generation for architectural design ideation, Int. J. Archit. Comput. 22 (3) (2024) 458-474

work page 2024
[45]

S. Peng, E. Kalliamvakou, P. Cihon, M. Demirer, The impact of AI on developer productivity: evidence from GitHub Copilot, arXiv (2023) 2302.06590

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[46]

Sedkaoui, R

S. Sedkaoui, R. Benaichouba, Generative AI as a transformative force for innovation: a review of opportunities, applications and challenges, Eur. J. Innov. Manag. (2024)

work page 2024
[47]

E. Zhou, D. Lee, Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art, PNAS Nexus 3 (3) (2024) pgae052

work page 2024
[48]

L. Long, X. Chen, R. Wen, T.J.J. Li, L.C. Ray, Sketchar: supporting character design and illustration prototyping using generative AI, Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8 (CHI PLAY) (2024) 337

work page 2024
[49]

Ternar, A

A. Ternar, A. Denisova, J.M. Cunha, A. Kultima, C. Guckelsberger, Generative AI in game development: a qualitative research synthesis, arXiv (2025) 2509.11898

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Kim, J.Y

J.M. Kim, J.Y. Jeong, S.J. Kang, B. Seo, Research on automated game QA reporting based on natural language captions, Comput. Mater. Contin. 86 (2) (2025) 1-16

work page 2025
[51]

Cox, W.T

S.R. Cox, W.T. Ooi, Conversational interactions with NPCs in LLM-driven gaming: guidelines from a content analysis of A generative AI driven interactive narrative serious game for stress relief and its randomized controlled pilot study *Email: tingchenhsu.ac@gmail.com; 14 player feedback, in: International Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design, 2023, pp...

work page 2023
[52]

C. Hu, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, Game generation via large language models, in: 2024 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 2024, pp. 1-4

work page 2024
[53]

Kumaran, J

V. Kumaran, J. Rowe, B. Mott, J. Lester, Scenecraft: automating interactive narrative scene generation in digital games with large language models, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment 19 (1) (2023) 86-96

work page 2023
[54]

S. Hu, T. Huang, G. Liu, R.R. Kompella, S.F. Ilhan, Y. Xu, et al., A survey on large language model-based game agents, arXiv (2024) 2404.02039

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Wenzel, Basic strategies of cognitive behavioral therapy, Psychiatr

A. Wenzel, Basic strategies of cognitive behavioral therapy, Psychiatr. Clin. 40 (4) (2017) 597-609

work page 2017
[56]

srcnalt, OpenAI-Unity, version 0.2.2 [computer software], GitHub, 2024

work page 2024
[57]

Boucher, J.S

E.M. Boucher, J.S. Raiker, Engagement and retention in digital mental health interventions: a narrative review, BMC Digit. Health 2 (1) (2024) 52

work page 2024
[58]

Ezawa, S.D

I.D. Ezawa, S.D. Hollon, Cognitive restructuring and psychotherapy outcome: a meta-analytic review, Psychotherapy 60 (3) (2023) 396

work page 2023
[59]

Hammerfald, H.H

K. Hammerfald, H.H. Jahren, O.A. Solbakken, The association between patient engagement and treatment outcome in guided internet-delivered CBT for anxiety and depression, Front. Psychol. 16 (2025) 1494729

work page 2025
[60]

Johnson, M.J

J.A. Johnson, M.J. Zawadzki, F.T. Materia, A.C. White, J.M. Smyth, Efficacy and acceptability of digital stress management micro-interventions, Procedia Comput. Sci. 206 (2022) 45-55

work page 2022
[61]

Bischof, T

A.Y. Bischof, T. Budig, S. Schläpfer, Y.X. Lukic, F. Schneider, P. Santhanam, et al., Long-term usage of Breeze, a gamified breathing training app, and its effect on momentary relaxation in people with cancer: cohort study, JMIR Serious Games 13 (2025) e70297

work page 2025
[62]

Taher, C.W

R. Taher, C.W. Hsu, C. Hampshire, C. Fialho, C. Heaysman, D. Stahl, et al., The safety of digital mental health interventions: systematic review and recommendations, JMIR Ment. Health 10 (1) (2023) e47433

work page 2023
[63]

Aktaş, V.E

G.K. Aktaş, V.E. İlgin, The effect of deep breathing exercise and 4-7-8 breathing techniques applied to patients after bariatric surgery on anxiety and quality of life, Obes. Surg. 33 (3) (2023) 920-929

work page 2023
[64]

Russoniello, K

C.V. Russoniello, K. O’Brien, J.M. Parks, EEG, HRV and psychological correlates while playing Bejeweled II: a randomized controlled study, Annu. Rev. Cyberther. Telemed. (2009) 189-192

work page 2009
[65]

Imran, Combat stress, anxiety and panic attacks: 5-4-3-2-1 coping technique, J

A. Imran, Combat stress, anxiety and panic attacks: 5-4-3-2-1 coping technique, J. Trauma Stress Disord. Treat. 9 (4) (2020)

work page 2020