pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot

Canonical reference. 76% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

65 Pith papers citing it
Background 76% of classified citations
abstract

Generative AI tools hold promise to increase human productivity. This paper presents results from a controlled experiment with GitHub Copilot, an AI pair programmer. Recruited software developers were asked to implement an HTTP server in JavaScript as quickly as possible. The treatment group, with access to the AI pair programmer, completed the task 55.8% faster than the control group. Observed heterogenous effects show promise for AI pair programmers to help people transition into software development careers.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 17

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Generative AI tools hold promise to increase human productivity. This paper presents results from a controlled experiment with GitHub Copilot, an AI pair programmer. Recruited software developers were asked to implement an HTTP server in JavaScript as quickly as possible. The treatment group, with access to the AI pair programmer, completed the task 55.8% faster than the control group. Observed heterogenous effects show promise for AI pair programmers to help people transition into software development careers.

co-cited works

representative citing papers

The software space of science

cs.DL · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A network analysis of software mentions in 1.3 million papers identifies 520 tools in eight communities and shows disciplines maintain distinct, stable tool portfolios that are crystallizing toward common sets.

Agentic Much? Adoption of Coding Agents on GitHub

cs.SE · 2026-01-26 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Coding agents reached 22-29% adoption in GitHub projects within months of release, with agent-assisted commits larger and focused on features and bug fixes.

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study

cs.SE · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Analysis of 9,799 human-reviewed agentic PRs shows only 35.7% of rejections reflect clear agent failures, with 31.2% due to workflow constraints and 33.1% lacking clear rationale, plus notable interaction differences across agents.

Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity

cs.CL · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Multi-agent LLM teams outperform human teams in creativity (d=1.50) across tasks by producing more novel ideas, with distinct semantic exploration patterns predicting success for each group.

Defective Task Descriptions in LLM-Based Code Generation: Detection and Analysis

cs.SE · 2026-04-27 · conditional · novelty 6.0

SpecValidator detects lexical vagueness, under-specification, and syntax-formatting defects in LLM code-generation prompts with F1 0.804, outperforming GPT-5-mini and Claude Sonnet 4, and shows that under-specification is the most damaging defect type while richer benchmarks are more resilient.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 65 citing papers.