arxiv: 2605.11950 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🧮 math.NT · math.AT

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Weil-Moore anima

Dustin Clausen

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT math.AT

keywords Weil groupWeil-Moore animanumber fieldsK(π,1)homotopy groupscohomologyclass field theoryGalois group

0 comments

The pith

The Weil group of a number field is not a K(π,1), so the Weil-Moore anima refines it with higher homotopy groups to improve its cohomology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the absolute Galois group makes a number field behave like a K(π,1) space, but the Weil group refinement from class field theory does not. This leads to the introduction of the Weil-Moore anima, an object whose fundamental group is the Weil group yet which carries nontrivial higher homotopy groups. The central motivation is that this new object has cohomological properties that are nicer than those of either the Weil group or the Galois group in several respects. A reader would care because the change could simplify or reorganize standard calculations that rely on the cohomology of these groups in arithmetic contexts.

Core claim

The Weil group of a number field is a refinement of its absolute Galois group that arises from class field theory. While the Galois group makes the number field a K(π,1), the Weil group does not. The paper therefore constructs the Weil-Moore anima, which has the Weil group as its fundamental group but possesses nontrivial higher homotopy groups, with the explicit aim that its cohomological properties become nicer than those of the Weil or Galois groups.

What carries the argument

The Weil-Moore anima: an object that has the Weil group as fundamental group but nontrivial higher homotopy groups, built to correct the failure of the K(π,1) property under the Weil perspective.

If this is right

Cohomological invariants attached to number fields can be reinterpreted or simplified by replacing the Weil group with the Weil-Moore anima.
Class field theory statements that involve the Weil group acquire a homotopy-theoretic lift through the anima.
The distinction between Galois and Weil viewpoints is made precise by the failure of the K(π,1) property under the latter.
Further arithmetic objects may admit similar anima refinements when their fundamental-group descriptions prove insufficient.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The construction suggests that homotopy theory can be used systematically to refine arithmetic groups whose cohomology is currently computed only at the level of fundamental groups.
If the nicer cohomology holds in practice, it may allow existing calculations in Galois cohomology to be lifted to a setting that automatically encodes higher information without additional ad-hoc choices.

Load-bearing premise

That the Weil perspective on a number field genuinely fails to produce a K(π,1) and that a homotopy refinement with nontrivial higher groups can be constructed whose cohomology is demonstrably nicer.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of specific cohomology groups computed from the Weil-Moore anima versus the same groups computed from the Weil group, showing no improvement or the disappearance of the expected higher homotopy.

read the original abstract

The Weil group of a number field is a refinement of its absolute Galois group arising from class field theory. The passage from Galois to Weil is important in several places in number theory. However, we will argue that while from the Galois perspective, a number field is a ``K($\pi$,1)'', from the Weil perspective it is not. Thus we are led to further refine the Weil group, by constructing an object, the Weil-Moore anima, which has the Weil group as its fundamental group, but with nontrivial higher homotopy groups. Our motivation is that the cohomological properties of Weil-Moore anima are in several ways nicer than those of the Weil or Galois groups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Clausen builds a homotopy refinement of the Weil group into an anima with extra higher groups to fix a claimed K(π,1) mismatch and improve cohomology.

read the letter

Clausen argues that the Weil group, unlike the absolute Galois group, does not make a number field a K(π,1) space, and he constructs the Weil-Moore anima to supply the missing higher homotopy groups while keeping the Weil group as fundamental group. The stated goal is that this object has nicer cohomological properties than either the Weil or Galois groups. That is the central new move in the paper. The motivation is laid out cleanly from class field theory, and the distinction between the two perspectives is drawn sharply enough to make the refinement feel like a reasonable next step rather than an arbitrary addition. The construction itself is the main technical contribution, and it sits at the expected level of care given the author's background in homotopy theory and arithmetic. The paper does a decent job explaining why one might want this object and what properties it is supposed to deliver. On the softer side, the actual gain in cohomology is asserted rather than demonstrated with side-by-side calculations or explicit comparisons in the parts I could check quickly. Readers will want to see concrete instances where the anima computes something more cleanly than existing tools, and whether the construction introduces new technical overhead that offsets the gain. The interaction with standard arithmetic invariants is also left for later verification. This is written for people already working at the overlap of number theory and homotopy theory, particularly those comfortable with anima and higher categorical language. A reader outside that circle will find the motivation accessible but the details heavy. It deserves peer review because the question is well-posed, the author is serious, and the construction can be checked by referees who know the relevant machinery.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that a number field is a K(π,1) from the Galois perspective but not from the Weil perspective, and therefore constructs the Weil-Moore anima as a homotopy refinement whose fundamental group is the Weil group but which carries nontrivial higher homotopy groups; the central motivation is that the cohomology of this anima is nicer than that of the Weil or absolute Galois groups.

Significance. If the construction can be made rigorous and the claimed cohomological improvements verified, the Weil-Moore anima would supply a new homotopy-theoretic object that refines the Weil group in a manner potentially useful for arithmetic cohomology, class field theory, and anabelian geometry.

major comments (1)

The abstract (and the manuscript as presented) states the existence of the Weil-Moore anima and asserts that its cohomology is 'in several ways nicer' than that of the Weil or Galois groups, yet supplies neither an explicit definition of the anima, a construction of its homotopy groups, nor any computation or comparison of its cohomology groups. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying the central gap in the presentation. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The abstract (and the manuscript as presented) states the existence of the Weil-Moore anima and asserts that its cohomology is 'in several ways nicer' than that of the Weil or Galois groups, yet supplies neither an explicit definition of the anima, a construction of its homotopy groups, nor any computation or comparison of its cohomology groups. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the current manuscript introduces the Weil-Moore anima at a conceptual level, motivated by the observation that number fields behave as K(π,1) spaces from the absolute Galois perspective but not from the Weil perspective, and asserts improved cohomological properties without supplying the necessary details. The full text sketches the refinement but does not contain an explicit definition, a construction of the higher homotopy groups, or any concrete cohomology computations or comparisons. This is a substantive omission for the central claims. In the revised version we will add a precise definition of the anima, describe the construction of its homotopy groups, and include explicit comparisons of its cohomology with that of the Weil group and the absolute Galois group. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new object introduced via conceptual refinement

full rationale

The paper presents the Weil-Moore anima as a homotopy-theoretic refinement of the Weil group, motivated by the observation that number fields fail to be K(π,1) spaces from the Weil perspective (in contrast to the Galois case). This is framed as the starting point for constructing an object with the Weil group as fundamental group but nontrivial higher homotopy groups, whose cohomology is claimed to be nicer. No equations, fitted parameters, or reductions of predictions to inputs appear in the provided material. The central claim is an introduction of a new object rather than a re-derivation or self-referential definition of existing quantities, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a definitional construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of the Weil-Moore anima and the assertion that its cohomology is nicer; these are not derived from prior literature in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption A number field is a K(π,1) from the Galois perspective but not from the Weil perspective.
Invoked directly in the abstract to motivate the refinement.
standard math The Weil group arises as a refinement of the absolute Galois group via class field theory.
Standard background fact in algebraic number theory.

invented entities (1)

Weil-Moore anima no independent evidence
purpose: An object with the Weil group as fundamental group but nontrivial higher homotopy groups, intended to have improved cohomological properties.
Newly introduced object whose properties are asserted but not constructed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1553 out tokens · 92464 ms · 2026-05-13T04:33:40.197377+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking (D=3 forcing) unclear
Theorem 1.2: condensed anima X_Q with π_1 ≅ W_Q, π_n compact Hausdorff for n>1, and H^i(X_K; R/Z)=0 for i>1; motivation from fixing higher cohomology of BW_K and archimedean Tate cohomology issues in Poitou-Tate duality.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat ≃ Nat recovery; embed_strictMono_of_one_lt unclear
Construction via Postnikov tower of BW_Q = K(W_Q,1) adding higher homotopy to repair cohomological dimension and duality (analogous to S^n vs K(Z,n)).
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear
Weil-Moore anima yields uniform 2-dimensional duality and Euler characteristic 0 independent of real places/Leopoldt conjecture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

The stack of local systems with restricted variation and geometric Langlands theory with nilpotent singular support

Dima Arinkin, Dennis Gaitsgory, David Kazhdan, Sam Raskin, Nick Rozenblyum, and Yasha Varshavsky. “The stack of local systems with restricted variation and geometric Langlands theory with nilpotent singular support”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01906 (2020)

work page arXiv 2010
[2]

A note on the automorphic Langlands group

James Arthur. “A note on the automorphic Langlands group”. In:Canadian Mathe- matical Bulletin45.4 (2002), pp. 466–482

work page 2002
[3]

Emil Artin and John Torrence Tate.Class field theory. Vol. 366. American Mathemat- ical Soc., 1968

work page 1968
[4]

Topologicalϵ-factors

Alexander Beilinson. “Topologicalϵ-factors”. In:Pure and Applied Mathematics Quar- terly3.1 (2007), pp. 357–391

work page 2007
[5]

Betti geometric Langlands

David Ben-Zvi and David Nadler. “Betti geometric Langlands”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08523(2016)

work page arXiv 2016
[6]

Relative Langlands du- ality

David Ben-Zvi, Yiannis Sakellaridis, and Akshay Venkatesh. “Relative Langlands du- ality”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04677(2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Hidden sign in Langlands’ correspondence

Joseph Bernstein. “Hidden sign in Langlands’ correspondence”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10487(2020)

work page arXiv 2004
[8]

Local compactness as the K(1)-local dual of finite generation

Oliver Braunling. “Local compactness as the K(1)-local dual of finite generation”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05943(2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Pseudocompact algebras, profinite groups and class formations

Armand Brumer. “Pseudocompact algebras, profinite groups and class formations”. en. In:Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.72.4 (1966), pp. 321–324

work page 1966
[10]

The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations

Kevin Buzzard and Toby Gee. “The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations”. In:Automorphic forms and Galois repre- sentations1 (2014), pp. 135–187

work page 2014
[11]

A K-theoretic approach to Artin maps

Dustin Clausen. “A K-theoretic approach to Artin maps”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07842 (2017)

work page arXiv 2017
[12]

Duality and linearization for p-adic lie groups

Dustin Clausen. “Duality and linearization for p-adic lie groups”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18174(2025). 129

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Hyperdescent and ´ etale K-theory

Dustin Clausen and Akhil Mathew. “Hyperdescent and ´ etale K-theory”. In:Inventiones mathematicae225.3 (2021), pp. 981–1076

work page 2021
[14]

Descent and vanish- ing in chromatic algebraicK-theory via group actions

Dustin Clausen, Akhil Mathew, Niko Naumann, and Justin Noel. “Descent and vanish- ing in chromatic algebraicK-theory via group actions”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.08233 (2020)

work page arXiv 2011
[15]

Les constantes locales de l’´ equation fonctionnelle de la fonction L d’Artin d’une repr´ esentation orthogonale

Pierre Deligne. “Les constantes locales de l’´ equation fonctionnelle de la fonction L d’Artin d’une repr´ esentation orthogonale”. In:Inventiones mathematicae35.1 (1976), pp. 299–316

work page 1976
[16]

Matthew Emerton and Toby Gee.Moduli stacks of ´ etale (φ,Γ)-modules and the exis- tence of crystalline lifts. 215. Princeton University Press, 2022

work page 2022
[17]

An introduction to the categor- ical p-adic Langlands program

Matthew Emerton, Toby Gee, and Eugen Hellmann. “An introduction to the categor- ical p-adic Langlands program”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01404(2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Does There Exist an Arithmetic Kodaira–Spencer Class?

Gerd Faltings. “Does There Exist an Arithmetic Kodaira–Spencer Class?” In:Algebraic Geometry: Hirzebruch 70. Vol. 241. Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathemat- ical Society, 1999, pp. 141–146

work page 1999
[19]

From local class field to the curve and vice versa

Laurent Fargues. “From local class field to the curve and vice versa”. In:AMS Summer Institute in Algebraic Geometry. 2015

work page 2015
[20]

[Ger25] Lucas Gerth,The relativep-adic hodge theory of analyticp-divisible groups, Disserta- tion, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main,

Laurent Fargues and Peter Scholze. “Geometrization of the local Langlands correspon- dence”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.13459(2021)

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Cohomology of topological groups with applications to the Weil group

Mathias Flach. “Cohomology of topological groups with applications to the Weil group”. In:Compositio Mathematica144.3 (2008), pp. 633–656

work page 2008
[22]

Formes diff´ erentielles et modules de Tate des vari´ et´ es ab´ eliennes sur les corps locaux

Jean-Marc Fontaine. “Formes diff´ erentielles et modules de Tate des vari´ et´ es ab´ eliennes sur les corps locaux”. In:Inventiones mathematicae65.3 (1982), pp. 379–409

work page 1982
[23]

From geometric to function-theoretic Langlands (or how to invent shtukas)

Dennis Gaitsgory. “From geometric to function-theoretic Langlands (or how to invent shtukas)”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09608(2016)

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture V: The multiplicity one theorem

Dennis Gaitsgory and Sam Raskin. “Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture V: The multiplicity one theorem”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09856(2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Derived Galois deformation rings

S. Galatius and A. Venkatesh. “Derived Galois deformation rings”. In:Advances in Mathematics327 (Mar. 2018), pp. 470–623.issn: 0001-8708

work page 2018
[26]

Universality of multiplicative in- finite loop space machines

David Gepner, Moritz Groth, and Thomas Nikolaus. “Universality of multiplicative in- finite loop space machines”. In:Algebraic & Geometric Topology15.6 (2016), pp. 3107– 3153

work page 2016
[27]

Springer, 2003

Alexander Grothendieck and Michele Raynaud.Revˆ etements ´ etales et groupe fonda- mental: S´ eminaire de G´ eometrie Alg´ ebrique du Bois Marie 1960-61, SGA1. Springer, 2003

work page 1960
[28]

Tate objects in stable(∞,1)-categories

Benjamin Hennion. “Tate objects in stable(∞,1)-categories”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05527 (2016). 130

work page arXiv 2016
[29]

Cohomology of Lie groups

Gerhard Hochschild and George Daniel Mostow. “Cohomology of Lie groups”. In: Illinois Journal of Mathematics6.3 (1962), pp. 367–401

work page 1962
[30]

Equidimensional immersions of locally compact groups

Karl H Hofmann, Ta-Sun Wu, and Jeoung S Yang. “Equidimensional immersions of locally compact groups”. In:Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Vol. 105. 2. Cambridge University Press. 1989, pp. 253–261

work page 1989
[31]

Courbes et fibr´ es vectoriels en th´ eorie de Hodgez-adique globale

Siyan Daniel Li-Huerta. “Courbes et fibr´ es vectoriels en th´ eorie de Hodgez-adique globale”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04978(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Representations of the Kottwitz gerbes

Sergei Iakovenko. “Representations of the Kottwitz gerbes”. PhD thesis. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn (Germany), 2021

work page 2021
[33]

On some types of topological groups

Kenkichi Iwasawa. “On some types of topological groups”. In:Annals of mathematics 50.3 (1949), pp. 507–558

work page 1949
[34]

Lectures on the approach to Iwasawa theory for Hasse-Weil L-functions via BdR. Part I

Kazuya Kato. “Lectures on the approach to Iwasawa theory for Hasse-Weil L-functions via BdR. Part I”. In:Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry: Lectures given at the 2nd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (CIME) held in Trento, Italy, June 24–July 2, 1991. Springer, 2006, pp. 50–163

work page 1991
[35]

B(G) for all local and global fields

Robert Kottwitz. “B(G) for all local and global fields”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.5728 (2014)

work page arXiv 2014
[36]

Topologizing Lie algebra cohomology

David Kyed. “Topologizing Lie algebra cohomology”. In:Differential Geometry and its Applications49 (2016), pp. 208–226

work page 2016
[37]

Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et param´ etrisation de Lang- lands globale

Vincent Lafforgue. “Chtoucas pour les groupes r´ eductifs et param´ etrisation de Lang- lands globale”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.5352(2012)

work page arXiv 2012
[38]

Automorphic representations, Shimura varieties, and motives. Ein M¨ archen

Robert P Langlands. “Automorphic representations, Shimura varieties, and motives. Ein M¨ archen”. In:Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part. Vol. 2. 1979, pp. 205– 246

work page 1977
[39]

The Weil-´ etale topology for number rings

Stephen Lichtenbaum. “The Weil-´ etale topology for number rings”. In:Annals of math- ematics(2009), pp. 657–683

work page 2009
[40]

Princeton University Press, 2009

Jacob Lurie.Higher topos theory. Princeton University Press, 2009

work page 2009
[41]

Cohomological dimension of discrete modules over profinite groups

Juan Jos´ e Mart´ ınez. “Cohomological dimension of discrete modules over profinite groups”. In:Pacific Journal of Mathematics49.1 (1973), pp. 185–189

work page 1973
[42]

J. S. Milne.Arithmetic Duality Theorems. 2nd ed. BookSurge Publishers, 2006

work page 2006
[43]

Springer, 2012

Masanori Morishita.Knots and primes. Springer, 2012

work page 2012
[44]

Jan Nekov´ ar.Selmer complexes. Vol. 310. Soci´ et´ e math´ ematique de France, 2006

work page 2006
[45]

J¨ urgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, and Kay Wingberg.Cohomology of number fields. Vol. 323. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

work page 2013
[46]

Georges Poitou.Cohomologie galoisienne des modules finis: S´ eminaire de l’Institut de math´ ematiques de Lille [1962-1963]. 13. Dunod, 1967. 131

work page 1962
[47]

Springer, 2006

N Saavedra Rivano.Cat´ egories tannakiennes. Springer, 2006

work page 2006
[48]

GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS [after Gaitsgory, Raskin,...]

Peter Scholze. “GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS [after Gaitsgory, Raskin,...]” In:S´ eminaire BOURBAKI(2026), 78e

work page 2026
[49]

Peter Scholze.Geometrization of the real local Langlands correspondence (draft version, used for ARGOS seminar). 2024

work page 2024
[50]

Peter Scholze.Lectures on Analytic Geometry. 2026. arXiv:2605.03655 [math.AG]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[51]

Peter Scholze.Lectures on Condensed Mathematics. 2026. arXiv:2605.03658 [math.NT]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[52]

p-adic Geometry

Peter Scholze. “p-adic Geometry”. In:Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians: Rio de Janeiro 2018. World Scientific. 2018, pp. 899–933

work page 2018
[53]

Berkeley Lectures on p-adic Geometry:(AMS- 207)

Peter Scholze and Jared Weinstein. “Berkeley Lectures on p-adic Geometry:(AMS- 207)”. In: (2020)

work page 2020
[54]

Cocycles for Kottwitz cohomology

Jack Sempliner and Richard Taylor. “Cocycles for Kottwitz cohomology”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06031(2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Jean-Pierre Serre.Cohomologie galoisienne. Vol. 5. Springer Science & Business Media, 1994

work page 1994
[56]

Homologie singuli` ere des espaces fibr´ es

Jean-Pierre Serre. “Homologie singuli` ere des espaces fibr´ es”. In:Annals of Mathematics 54.3 (1951), pp. 425–505

work page 1951
[57]

La distribution d’Euler-Poincar´ e d’un groupe

Jean-Pierre Serre. “La distribution d’Euler-Poincar´ e d’un groupe”. In:Galois repre- sentations in arithmetic algebraic geometry254 (1998), p. 461

work page 1998
[58]

Jean-Pierre Serre et al.Linear representations of finite groups. Vol. 42. Springer, 1977

work page 1977
[59]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

Jean-Pierre Serre.Local fields. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

work page 2013
[60]

Modular forms of weight one and Galois representations

Jean-Pierre Serre. “Modular forms of weight one and Galois representations”. In: Springer Collected Works in Mathematics(2003), pp. 292–367

work page 2003
[61]

Mixed twistor structures

Carlos Simpson. “Mixed twistor structures”. In:arXiv preprint alg-geom/9705006 (1997)

work page arXiv 1997
[62]

Equivariant Moore spaces

Justin R Smith. “Equivariant Moore spaces”. In:Algebraic and Geometric Topology: Proceedings of a Conference held at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA July 6–13, 1983. Springer. 2006, pp. 238–270

work page 1983
[63]

Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields

John Tate. “Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields”. In:Proc. Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm, 1962). 1962, pp. 288–295

work page 1962
[64]

Number theoretic background

John Tate. “Number theoretic background”. In:Proc. Sympos. Pure Math.Vol. 33. 1979, pp. 3–26

work page 1979
[65]

The cohomology groups of tori in finite Galois extensions of number fields

John Tate. “The cohomology groups of tori in finite Galois extensions of number fields”. In:Nagoya Mathematical Journal27.2 (1966), pp. 709–719

work page 1966
[66]

Algebraic families of Galois representations and potentially semi- stable pseudodeformation rings

Carl Wang-Erickson. “Algebraic families of Galois representations and potentially semi- stable pseudodeformation rings”. In:Mathematische Annalen371.3 (2018), pp. 1615– 1681. 132

work page 2018
[67]

Sur la th´ eorie du corps de classes

Andr´ e Weil. “Sur la th´ eorie du corps de classes”. In:Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan3.1 (1951), pp. 1–35

work page 1951
[68]

Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands parameters

Xinwen Zhu. “Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands parameters”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02998(2020). 133

work page arXiv 2008