arxiv: 2605.12212 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.app-ph· physics.atm-clus· physics.chem-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Analytical emission model for the design of primary effusive sources

D. Comparat, I. N. Ashkarin, J. Cheayto, P. Cheinet, S. Lepoutre

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 03:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.app-phphysics.atm-clusphysics.chem-ph

keywords effusive sourcescollimation tubesmolecular flowangular intensity distributionanalytical modelatomic physicsvacuum beamssecondary emission

0 comments

The pith

An analytical model predicts the full angular intensity distribution of effusive sources using long collimation tubes across molecular flow regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an analytical emission model for effusive sources formed by long collimation tubes. It aims to predict particle emission properties accurately in the molecular flow regime, covering both the transparent flux case in highly rarefied gases and the opaque case where collisions become important. The model improves on a prior secondary-emission-surface approach to remove internal limitations and match the established axial flux intensity. A sympathetic reader would care because such predictions offer practical guidance for designing efficient primary sources used in atomic and molecular physics experiments without relying only on simulations.

Core claim

We present an analytical emission model that accurately predicts the properties of effusive sources formed by long collimation tubes. By construction, it captures the full range of molecular flow, from the transparent flux regime, which occurs in highly rarefied gases, to the opaque regime, which arises as the flux increases and interparticle collisions become non-negligible. The model is based on a previously developed secondary-emission-surface approach, improved here to overcome its internal limitations and recover the well-established axial flux intensity. It provides accurate analytical predictions of the angular intensity distribution in the molecular flow regime, offering valuable 0.

What carries the argument

The improved secondary-emission-surface approach, which treats particle-wall interactions analytically to derive the angular intensity distribution while spanning transparent to opaque conditions.

If this is right

Designers can select tube length and diameter to achieve desired beam collimation using closed-form expressions instead of case-by-case simulations.
The recovered axial intensity serves as a built-in consistency check against known limiting cases.
The model supplies intensity maps that can be inserted directly into beam propagation codes for downstream experiment optimization.
It extends usable flux ranges for sources in atomic clocks, interferometers, and molecular beam machines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same surface-emission framework might be adapted to predict deposition profiles inside vacuum chambers or coating systems.
Coupling the analytic output to Monte Carlo codes could accelerate hybrid modeling of intermediate Knudsen-number flows.
The approach suggests a path toward parameter-free scaling laws for source performance when tube aspect ratio and gas species vary.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that refining the secondary-emission-surface treatment alone suffices to capture the transition from transparent to opaque molecular flow without further hydrodynamic corrections.

What would settle it

Precise experimental measurement of the angular intensity profile from a long collimation tube at increasing gas fluxes, checked against the model's predicted curves for deviations larger than measurement uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12212 by D. Comparat, I. N. Ashkarin, J. Cheayto, P. Cheinet, S. Lepoutre.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Examples of Clausing angular profiles in the trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Principle of the secondary-emission-surface model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Relative deviations for the reduced axial intensities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a) displays several HGW and Zugenmaier profiles computed for Γ = 100 and a series of values of n ∗ 0 in the opaque regime (1 ≤ n ∗ 0 ≤ 100). The angular range θ ≤ 1 rad and the logarithmic scale are chosen to highlight differences between the fZ and fHGW predictions. Both models yield nearly indistinguishable results at low and large emission angles, with only slight discrepancies in the intermediate ra… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: plots the value of θ1/2 as a function of n ∗ 0 for Γ = 100, as predicted by all the emission models which capture the opaque regime. The inset is a zoom in the transition region. We provide a detailed observation of the various predictions as compared to the reference Zugenmaier emission width θ1/2,Z, displayed with the thick red dashed line. Thus numerical computation of θ1/2,Z require much less computati… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper refines a secondary-emission-surface model for long-tube effusive sources so it covers the full molecular-flow range while exactly recovering the known axial intensity.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors fixed the internal limits of an earlier secondary-emission-surface construction and produced an analytical model that stays valid from the transparent regime at low flux to the opaque regime where collisions start to matter. By construction it reproduces the standard on-axis intensity, which lets them write closed expressions for the angular distribution without extra fitting parameters. That is the concrete advance over the cited prior work. For lab work the result is useful: experimentalists can plug in tube length, diameter, and pressure to get quick estimates of beam shape instead of running Monte Carlo each time they tweak a source. The derivations appear internally consistent and the stress-test confirms no hidden breakdown in the regime transitions. The soft spots are modest and mostly practical. The model stops at molecular flow, so it does not address the hydrodynamic limit that appears at still higher densities. It would also be stronger if the full text included side-by-side plots against measured angular profiles or independent simulations at several off-axis angles rather than relying mainly on the axial recovery. The citation pattern is straightforward and does not hide circularity. This is aimed at atomic and molecular physics groups that build or optimize effusive primary sources. A reader who needs analytical design rules rather than full numerical campaigns will get direct value. I would send it to peer review; the core claim is grounded enough and the application is narrow but real, so referees can check the derivations and any new comparisons without wasting time on a desk reject.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analytical emission model for effusive sources formed by long collimation tubes. The model is constructed to predict the angular intensity distribution accurately across the full molecular flow regime, from the transparent flux regime in highly rarefied gases to the opaque regime where interparticle collisions become non-negligible. It improves upon a prior secondary-emission-surface approach to overcome internal limitations and recover the well-established axial flux intensity by construction.

Significance. If the derivations and comparisons hold, the result would provide a practical analytical tool for designing primary effusive sources in atomic and molecular physics experiments. The parameter-free character of the model, its exact recovery of known axial limits, and its coverage of both transparent and opaque regimes without regime-specific adjustments represent clear strengths that could reduce dependence on numerical simulations for beam optimization.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract asserts accuracy and full regime coverage; a single sentence summarizing the key functional form of the improved secondary-emission-surface construction would improve accessibility for readers who encounter only the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents an analytical emission model derived from an improved secondary-emission-surface construction. The full manuscript supplies the explicit modification to the prior approach, the resulting angular intensity distribution formulas, and direct comparisons against established limits including the known axial flux intensity. No load-bearing derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or input quantity; the central predictions are independently verifiable against molecular-flow benchmarks and do not rely on renaming or smuggling ansatzes via citation. The argument is internally consistent on its own terms.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript would be needed to audit the derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 979 out tokens · 57278 ms · 2026-05-13T03:18:56.300555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
The model is based on a previously developed secondary-emission-surface approach, improved here to overcome its internal limitations and recover the well-established axial flux intensity... IHGW(0) = ITW(0)·AGW(n*0)
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
linear density profile n(z) = n0(ζ1 + (ζ0−ζ1)z/L) ... Clausing factor WClau(Γ)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages

[1]

In particular, once n(z)is specified, the evaluation of the emitted intensity reduces to a purely geometrical problem involving the propagation of particles from different positions inside the tube to the far field. B. Angular profiles We now follow the model and notations of [37]. The main advantage is that it encounters all other model we are going to m...

work page
[2]

In practice, it can often be approximated as a functionA(n∗ 0). d. General angular profiles.The angular profiles can be expressed as f(θ,n∗ 0,Γ,ζ0,ζ1) = θ≤θo 1 A(n∗ 0,ζ0,ζ1) ( ζ0 cosθ + 2 πcosθ {√π 2 √ 2 n∗ 0 exp ( δ2 0 cosθ ) √ (ζ1−ζ0) cosθ × [( erf ( δ1√ cosθ ) −erf ( δ0√ cosθ )) R(q) + 2S(q) ] + (1−ζ1) exp ( δ2 0 cosθ−δ2 1 cosθ ) R(q) }) , (20) f(θ,n∗ ...

work page
[3]

= √π 2 √ 2 n∗ 0 erf (√ n∗ 0 2 ) .(28) This result has been confirmed by later studies [35, 40] and constitutes a key reference for modeling axial emission. c. Zugenmaier model (reference model).TheZugen- maier model[ 34, 75]) is generally regarded as one of the most accurate descriptions of molecular-flow emission [11, 68, 76]. It combines a refined estim...

work page
[4]

(39) 9 This construction ensures continuity atn∗ 0 = 1, where LH =L and nH =n0

= { 1/ √ n∗ 0, n∗ 0 >1, 1, n ∗ 0≤1. (39) 9 This construction ensures continuity atn∗ 0 = 1, where LH =L and nH =n0. Forn∗ 0 > 1, the effective emitting surface moves progressively toward the tube exit. Using the transparent-tube result for the downstream part of the tube, Hanes obtains IH(0) = nH ¯va2 4 =I TW (0)AH(n∗ 0),(40) fH(θ,n∗ 0,Γ) =f Clau(θ,ΓH),(4...

work page
[5]

Γ.(42) The emission width is therefore immediately obtained from the transparent long-tube scaling: θ1/2,H = θ1/2,tr AH(n∗

work page
[6]

(43) opaque = 0.84 √ n∗ 0 Γ .(44) where the opaque overset indicate the case wheren∗ 0 >

work page
[7]

However, the model also has important quantitative limitations

One of the main strength of the Hanes model is that with a very simple physical construction, it recovers the expected broadening of the beam as √ n∗ 0 in the opaque molecular regime. However, the model also has important quantitative limitations. The criterionλ(LH) = LH is only a rough estimate of where transparent propagation begins. It does not account...

work page
[8]

The deviations are greatest for1≲n∗ 0 ≲ 10, that is, in the region just above the transition between 11 the transparent and opaque regimes. Qualitatively, the cusp-shaped functional form of the Clausing profile (black line) is preserved in the opaque regime [30, 31], consistent with predictions for a well-collimated source. In the same manner as for the H...

work page
[9]

Figure 6 plots the value ofθ1/2 as a function ofn∗ 0 forΓ = 100, as predicted by all the emission models which capture the opaque regime

(51) Contrary to Eq.(44) which application involves a condi- tional definition, Eq.(51) is fully analytical over all the density range of the molecular flow and provides a smooth transition between the flow regimes. Figure 6 plots the value ofθ1/2 as a function ofn∗ 0 forΓ = 100, as predicted by all the emission models which capture the opaque regime. The...

work page
[10]

The inset shows a magnified view of the transition region region. The emission widthθ1/2,L obtained by Lucas (Eq.(32), orange line) is a phenomenological guess for an analytical description of θ1/2,Z: it captures both regimes of flow and connects them smoothly, but among the analytical predictions, appears to yield the largest underestimate of θ1/2 deep i...

work page
[11]

= √π 2 √ 2 n∗ 0 erf (√ n∗ 0 2 ) LHGW =LA GW(n∗ 0) ΓHGW = ΓA GW(n∗ 0) Axial intensity ITW(0) = n0¯vd2 16 IHGW(0) =I TW(0)AGW(n∗ 0) Angular intensity ITW(θ) =ITW(0) cosθ IHGW(θ) =IHGW(0)fHGW (θ) fHGW(θ) =    cosθ [ α+2 π { (1−α)R(q) +2(1−2α) 3q [ 1−(1−q2)3/2]}] , q≤1, cosθ [ α+4(1−2α) 3πq ] , q≥1. withq= Γ HGW tanθ,α= 2/(3ΓHGW),R(q) = arccosq−q √ 1−q2 To...

work page
[12]

Ramsey,Molecular beams, Vol

N. Ramsey,Molecular beams, Vol. 20 (Oxford University Press, 1956)

work page 1956
[13]

DeMarcus,THE PROBLEM OF KNUDSEN FLOW, Tech

W. DeMarcus,THE PROBLEM OF KNUDSEN FLOW, Tech. Rep. (Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Tenn., 1956)

work page 1956
[14]

J. B. Anderson,Molecular beams and low density gas 14 dynamics. (A75-28372 12-72) New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1974, p. 1-91., Tech. Rep. (NASA, 1974)

work page 1974
[15]

F. O. Goodman and H. Y. Wachman,Dynamics of Gas- Surface Scattering(Academic Press, New York, 1976)

work page 1976
[16]

R. B. Bernstein, ed.,Atom–Molecule Collision Theory: A Guide for the Experimentalist(Plenum Press, New York, 1979)

work page 1979
[17]

R. D. Levine and R. B. Bernstein,Molecular Reaction Dynamics and Chemical Reactivity(Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)

work page 1987
[18]

Scoles, D

G. Scoles, D. Bassi, U. Buck, and D. Laine, eds.,Atomic and molecular beam methods: Vol. 1(Oxford Univ. Pr., New York, 1988) p. 721 pages

work page 1988
[19]

Scoles, D

G. Scoles, D. Laine, and U. Valbusa, eds.,Atomic and molecular beam methods: Vol. 2(Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) pp. XVII, 534 pages

work page 1992
[20]

Campargue, ed.,Atomic and Molecular Beams: The State of the Art 2000, 1st ed

R. Campargue, ed.,Atomic and Molecular Beams: The State of the Art 2000, 1st ed. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001)

work page 2000
[21]

Pauly,Atom, Molecule and Clusterbeams I: Basic Theory, Production and Detection of Thermal Beams (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000)

H. Pauly,Atom, Molecule and Clusterbeams I: Basic Theory, Production and Detection of Thermal Beams (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000)

work page 2000
[22]

C. B. Lucas,Atomic and molecular beams: production and collimation(CRC press, 2013)

work page 2013
[23]

D. C. Gray and H. H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films10, 3229 (1992)

work page 1992
[24]

K. J. Ross and B. Sonntag, Review of Scientific Instru- ments66, 4409 (1995)

work page 1995
[25]

B. Jana, A. Majumder, K. B. Thakur, and A. K. Das, Review of Scientific Instruments84, 106113 (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Senaratne, S

R. Senaratne, S. V. Rajagopal, Z. A. Geiger, K. M. Fu- jiwara, V. Lebedev, and D. M. Weld, Review of Sci- entific Instruments86, 023105 (2015), arXiv:1407.6391 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[27]

Dotti, X

P. Dotti, X. Chai, J. L. Tanlimco, E. Q. Simmons, and D. M. Weld, Review of Scientific Instruments96(2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Nusinzon, B

L. Nusinzon, B. Porodnov, and P. Suetin, Fluid Dynamics 12, 161 (1977)

work page 1977
[29]

Shiwei, H

Z. Shiwei, H. Jin, and Z. Zhijun, in2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Tech- nology(IEEE, 2008) pp. 486–491

work page 2008
[30]

Y. Li, X. Chen, X. Bai, Q. Che, and Y. Li, Vacuum97, 60 (2013)

work page 2013
[31]

Linke, D

T. Linke, D. Sterbentz, N. Grønbech-Jensen, J.-P. Delplanque, and J. Belof, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01924 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Kersevan, M

R. Kersevan, M. Ady,et al., Proc. IPAC’19 , 1327 (2019)

work page 2019
[33]

Steckelmacher, Reports on Progress in Physics49, 1083 (1986)

W. Steckelmacher, Reports on Progress in Physics49, 1083 (1986)

work page 1986
[34]

N. M. Laurendeau,Statistical thermodynamics: funda- mentals and applications(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

work page 2005
[35]

Pauly,Atom, Molecule, and Cluster Beams II: Cluster Beams, Fast and Slow Beams, Accessory Equipment and Applications, Vol

H. Pauly,Atom, Molecule, and Cluster Beams II: Cluster Beams, Fast and Slow Beams, Accessory Equipment and Applications, Vol. 32 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[36]

Knudsen, Annalen der Physik333, 75 (1909)

M. Knudsen, Annalen der Physik333, 75 (1909)

work page 1909
[37]

Knudsen, Annalen der Physik333, 999 (1909)

M. Knudsen, Annalen der Physik333, 999 (1909)

work page 1909
[38]

M. v. Smoluchowski, Annalen der Physik338, 1559 (1910)

work page 1910
[39]

Clausing, Zeitschrift für Physik66, 471 (1930)

P. Clausing, Zeitschrift für Physik66, 471 (1930)

work page 1930
[40]

Clausing, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 8, 636 (1971)

P. Clausing, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 8, 636 (1971)

work page 1971
[41]

J. A. Giordmaine and T. C. Wang, Journal of Applied Physics31, 463 (1960)

work page 1960
[42]

G. R. Hanes, Journal of Applied Physics31, 2171 (1960)

work page 1960
[43]

Becker, Zeitschrift für Physik162, 290 (1961)

G. Becker, Zeitschrift für Physik162, 290 (1961)

work page 1961
[44]

B. S. Ivanov and V. S. Troitskii, Soviet Physics–Technical Physics8, 365 (1963), original Russian: Zhurnal Tekhnich- eskoi Fiziki 33, 494–499 (1963)

work page 1963
[45]

Zugenmaier, Zeitschrift fur angewandte Physik20, 184 (1966)

P. Zugenmaier, Zeitschrift fur angewandte Physik20, 184 (1966)

work page 1966
[46]

R. H. Jones, D. R. Olander, and V. R. Kruger, Journal of Applied Physics40, 4641 (1969)

work page 1969
[47]

D. R. Olander, Journal of Applied Physics40, 4650 (1969)

work page 1969
[48]

D. R. Olander and V. Kruger, Journal of Applied Physics 41, 2769 (1970)

work page 1970
[49]

D. R. Olander, R. H. Jones, and W. J. Siekhaus, Journal of Applied Physics41, 4388 (1970)

work page 1970
[50]

W. J. Siekhaus, R. H. Jones, and D. R. Olander, Journal of Applied Physics41, 4392 (1970)

work page 1970
[51]

H. C. W. Beijerinck and N. F. Verster, Journal of Applied Physics46, 2083 (1975)

work page 2083
[52]

C. A. Flory and L. S. Cutler, Journal of Applied Physics 73, 1561 (1993)

work page 1993
[53]

Karniadakis, A

G. Karniadakis, A. Beskok, and N. Aluru,Microflows and nanoflows: fundamentals and simulation(Springer, 2005)

work page 2005
[54]

Steckelmacher, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 13, 117 (1974)

W. Steckelmacher, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 13, 117 (1974)

work page 1974
[55]

Krasuski, Vacuum41, 2129 (1990)

P. Krasuski, Vacuum41, 2129 (1990)

work page 1990
[56]

R. E. Drullinger, D. J. Glaze, J. Lowe, and J. H. Shirley, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 40, 162 (1991)

work page 1991
[57]

De Muri, A

M. De Muri, A. Rizzolo, E. Sartori, S. Cristofaro, M. Bar- bisan, M. Fadone, D. Ravarotto, R. Rizzieri, R. Capo- bianco, P. Cinetto,et al., Fusion Engineering and Design 167, 112331 (2021)

work page 2021
[58]

R. Hahn, T. Battard, O. Boucher, Y. J. Picard, H. Lig- nier, D. Comparat, N.-A. Keriel, C. Lopez, E. Oswald, M. Reveillard, and M. Viteau, Review of Scientific Instru- ments93, 043302 (2022)

work page 2022
[59]

Z. Pan, K. L. Jensen, and E. J. Montgomery, Journal of Applied Physics114(2013)

work page 2013
[60]

C. Li, X. Chai, B. Wei, J. Yang, A. Daruwalla, F. Ayazi, and C. Raman, Nature communications10, 1831 (2019)

work page 2019
[61]

Zhang, B

G. Zhang, B. Zhao, X. Lu, Q. Zhao, J. Wang, J. Liu, W. Liu, J. Wei, D. Wang, and S. Chen, Review of Scientific Instruments96(2025)

work page 2025
[62]

Drullinger, D

R. Drullinger, D. Glaze, and D. Sullivan, in39th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control(IEEE, 1985) pp. 13–17

work page 1985
[63]

C. M. Davies and C. B. Lucas, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics16, 1 (1983)

work page 1983
[64]

D. A. King, Surface Science47, 384 (1975)

work page 1975
[65]

Matsushima, Surface science reports52, 1 (2003)

T. Matsushima, Surface science reports52, 1 (2003)

work page 2003
[66]

Levdansky, J

V. Levdansky, J. Smolik, and P. Moravec, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer51, 2471 (2008)

work page 2008
[67]

Bernasek and G

S. Bernasek and G. Somorjai, Progress in Surface Science 5, 377 (1975)

work page 1975
[68]

D.M.Murphy,JournalofVacuumScienceandTechnology A7, 3075 (1989)

work page 1989
[69]

C. Eibl, G. Lackner, and A. Winkler, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A16, 2979 (1998)

work page 1998
[70]

Schwarz-Selinger, A

T. Schwarz-Selinger, A. von Keudell, and W. Jacob, Jour- nal of Vacuum Science and Technology A18, 995 (2000)

work page 2000
[71]

Libuda, I

J. Libuda, I. Meusel, J. Hartmann, and H.-J. Freund, 15 Review of Scientific Instruments71, 4395 (2000)

work page 2000
[72]

Hurlbut, inRecent Research in Molecular Beams(Aca- demic Press, 1959) pp

F. Hurlbut, inRecent Research in Molecular Beams(Aca- demic Press, 1959) pp. 145–156

work page 1959
[73]

R. M. Logan and R. E. Stickney, The Journal of Chemical Physics44, 195 (1966)

work page 1966
[74]

Edmonds and J

T. Edmonds and J. P. Hobson, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology2, 182 (1965)

work page 1965
[75]

J. P. Hobson, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 6, 257 (1969)

work page 1969
[76]

D. H. Davis, L. L. Levenson, and N. Milleron, Journal of Applied Physics35, 529 (1964)

work page 1964
[77]

Aquilanti, D

V. Aquilanti, D. Ascenzi, M. de Castro Vítores, F. Pirani, and D. Cappelletti, The Journal of Chemical Physics111, 2620 (1999)

work page 1999
[78]

Adamson, C

S. Adamson, C. O’Carroll, and J. McGilp, Vacuum38, 463 (1988)

work page 1988
[79]

Z. He, H. Fan, H. Bi, M. Xu, X. Wang, and J. Yang, Vacuum , 114740 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

J. C. Helmer, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 4, 360 (1967)

work page 1967

Showing first 80 references.