pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12338 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· stat.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Manifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization

Cornelius V. Braun, Marc Toussaint, Tilman Burghoff

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 06:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIstat.CO
keywords manifold samplingentropy maximizationconstrained samplingdisconnected componentsk-nearest neighborsresamplingKL divergencerobotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

MASEM resamples points to maximize entropy of their empirical distribution, enabling mixing across disconnected constrained manifolds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces MASEM to sample from distributions on manifolds defined by smooth equality and inequality constraints that can have multiple disconnected components. It employs a resampling procedure guided by k-nearest-neighbor density estimation to increase the entropy of the current set of points. In the mean-field limit this procedure reduces the KL divergence to the maximum-entropy target exponentially with each resampling step. The approach matters because existing constrained samplers typically assume the feasible set is connected, which fails in many robotics and optimization settings where the method is tested. Empirical results show an order-of-magnitude improvement in Sinkhorn distance over baselines at comparable runtime.

Core claim

MASEM performs sampling by repeatedly drawing new points from local samplers and accepting them so as to maximize the entropy of the empirical distribution estimated via k-nearest neighbors. In the mean-field regime the repeated application of this entropy-maximizing resampling drives the empirical distribution toward the maximum-entropy distribution at an exponential rate in the number of steps, without requiring explicit identification or enumeration of the manifold's disconnected components.

What carries the argument

The entropy-maximizing resampling step that uses k-nearest-neighbor density estimation to decide which candidate points to retain.

If this is right

  • Sampling proceeds without assuming or detecting the number of disconnected components in the feasible set.
  • KL divergence to the target decreases exponentially in the mean-field limit with each resampling iteration.
  • Sinkhorn distance on synthetic and robotics benchmarks improves by roughly an order of magnitude relative to prior constrained samplers.
  • The scheme works with any choice of local sampler and maintains competitive runtime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resampling logic could be paired with gradient-informed local proposals to accelerate exploration in high-dimensional problems.
  • If kNN entropy estimates remain stable, the method may extend to problems with mixed continuous-discrete constraints.
  • In Bayesian optimization pipelines the improved mixing could reduce the number of evaluations needed when the acquisition function has disconnected level sets.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field limit accurately describes the finite-sample resampling dynamics and k-nearest-neighbor entropy estimation remains reliable on the manifold geometry induced by the constraints.

What would settle it

A controlled mean-field simulation or finite-sample run on a known disconnected manifold in which the KL divergence between the empirical distribution and the maximum-entropy target fails to decrease exponentially over successive resampling steps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12338 by Cornelius V. Braun, Marc Toussaint, Tilman Burghoff.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scatter plots of 100 samples from different samplers on synthetic benchmarks. Black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Influence of τ and M hy￾perparameters for MASEM-NHR on the 7 lobes problem. We mean W2 2 distance across 5 seeds with 95% CI. Sampling Accuracy & Constraint Violation of MASEM. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sampling performance and wallclock time as the dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plots of 50 samples on the random motion planning problem. MASEM-based approaches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence over 5000 iterations on synthetic benchmarks. From left to right: (1) squared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative results for NHR and MASEM-NHR on all 2d benchmark problems. Black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stress test for scaling ambient and manifold dimension (first row) and scaling the ambient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Convergence curves on the motion planning problems with grid obstacles (first row) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Convergence on the grasping problem. Curves depict mean and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Number of covered components (out of 100), depending on temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic diagram visualizing the capsule in 2d. The red band in the middle rep￾resents the infeasible region. In the top left, a finger con￾tact is shown. The orange dot is the point of attack on the capsule surface. The orange cone shows the friction cone and the black arrow the sur￾face normal. The dotted black arrow in the middle symbol￾izes gravity. We grasp the capsule with three fingers. The finger… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sampling from constrained distributions has a wide range of applications, including in Bayesian optimization and robotics. Prior work establishes convergence and feasibility guarantees for constrained sampling, but assumes that the feasible set is connected. However, in practice, the feasible set often decomposes into multiple disconnected components, which makes efficient sampling under constraints challenging. In this paper, we propose MAnifold Sampling via Entropy Maximization (MASEM) for sampling on a manifold with an unknown number of disconnected components, implicitly defined by smooth equality and inequality constraints. The presented method uses a resampling scheme to maximize the entropy of the empirical distribution based on k-nearest neighbor density estimation. We show that, in the mean field, MASEM decreases the KL-divergence between the empirical distribution and the maximum-entropy target exponentially in the number of resampling steps. We instantiate MASEM with multiple local samplers and demonstrate its versatility and efficiency on synthetic and robotics-based benchmarks. MASEM enables fast and scalable mixing across a range of constrained sampling problems, improving over alternatives by an order of magnitude in Sinkhorn distance with competitive runtime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard manifold and density-estimation assumptions plus the mean-field simplification; no new entities are postulated and the only tunable elements are the usual k-NN and resampling hyperparameters.

free parameters (2)
  • k (nearest neighbors)
    Controls the bias-variance trade-off in the k-NN entropy estimator; value is chosen by the user.
  • number of resampling steps
    Determines how far the exponential contraction proceeds; chosen by the user.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The feasible set is a smooth manifold implicitly defined by differentiable equality and inequality constraints.
    Invoked to guarantee that local samplers can be run on the manifold and that k-NN distances are meaningful.
  • ad hoc to paper The mean-field limit applies to the finite-sample resampling dynamics.
    Required for the exponential KL contraction claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1333 out tokens · 72206 ms · 2026-05-13T06:34:37.719827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sampling in Constrained Domains with Orthogonal- Space Variational Gradient Descent.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 37108–37120, 2022

    Ruqi Zhang, Qiang Liu, and Xin Tong. Sampling in Constrained Domains with Orthogonal- Space Variational Gradient Descent.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 37108–37120, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    D. C. Rapaport.The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Zachary Kingston, Mark Moll, and Lydia E. Kavraki. Sampling-Based Methods for Motion Planning with Constraints.Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1(1): 159–185, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Sampling Constrained Trajectories Using Composable Diffusion Models

    Thomas Power, Rana Soltani-Zarrin, Soshi Iba, and Dmitry Berenson. Sampling Constrained Trajectories Using Composable Diffusion Models. InIROS 2023 Workshop on Differentiable Probabilistic Robotics: Emerging Perspectives on Robot Learning, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Reverse Curriculum Generation for Reinforcement Learning

    Carlos Florensa, David Held, Markus Wulfmeier, Michael Zhang, and Pieter Abbeel. Reverse Curriculum Generation for Reinforcement Learning. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 482–495. PMLR, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Constrained Sampling to Guide Universal Manipulation RL.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08557, 2026

    Marc Toussaint, Cornelius V Braun, Eckart Cobo-Briesewitz, Sayantan Auddy, Armand Jordana, and Justin Carpentier. Constrained Sampling to Guide Universal Manipulation RL.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08557, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Stability-Guided Exploration for Diverse Motion Generation, 2026

    Eckart Cobo-Briesewitz, Tilman Burghoff, Denis Shcherba, Armand Jordana, and Marc Tous- saint. Stability-Guided Exploration for Diverse Motion Generation, 2026

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning.Machine learning, 50(1):5–43, 2003

    Christophe Andrieu, Nando De Freitas, Arnaud Doucet, and Michael I Jordan. An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning.Machine learning, 50(1):5–43, 2003

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Fast Non-Log-Concave Sampling under Nonconvex Equality and Inequality Constraints with Landing

    Kijung Jeon, Michael Muehlebach, and Molei Tao. Fast Non-Log-Concave Sampling under Nonconvex Equality and Inequality Constraints with Landing. InThe Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2026

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Monte Carlo on Manifolds: Sampling Densities and Integrating Functions.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathe- matics, 71(12):2609–2647, 2018

    Emilio Zappa, Miranda Holmes-Cerfon, and Jonathan Goodman. Monte Carlo on Manifolds: Sampling Densities and Integrating Functions.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathe- matics, 71(12):2609–2647, 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Hybrid Monte Carlo methods for sampling probability measures on submanifolds.Numerische Mathematik, 143(2):379–421, 2019

    Tony Lelièvre, Mathias Rousset, and Gabriel Stoltz. Hybrid Monte Carlo methods for sampling probability measures on submanifolds.Numerische Mathematik, 143(2):379–421, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Direction Choice for Accelerated Convergence in Hit-and-Run Sampling.Operations Research, 46(1):84–95, 1998

    David E Kaufman and Robert L Smith. Direction Choice for Accelerated Convergence in Hit-and-Run Sampling.Operations Research, 46(1):84–95, 1998

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Accelerating Motion Planning via Optimal Transport.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:78453–78482, 2023

    An T Le, Georgia Chalvatzaki, Armin Biess, and Jan R Peters. Accelerating Motion Planning via Optimal Transport.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:78453–78482, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Learning Multimodal Behaviors from Scratch with Diffusion Policy Gradient.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:38456–38479, 2024

    Zechu Li, Rickmer Krohn, Tao Chen, Anurag Ajay, Pulkit Agrawal, and Georgia Chalvatzaki. Learning Multimodal Behaviors from Scratch with Diffusion Policy Gradient.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:38456–38479, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Discovering Many Diverse Solutions with Bayesian Optimization

    Natalie Maus, Kaiwen Wu, David Eriksson, and Jacob Gardner. Discovering Many Diverse Solutions with Bayesian Optimization. InInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1779–1798. PMLR, 2023. 10

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    A Nonparametric Estimate of a Multivariate Density Function.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36(3):1049–1051, 1965

    Don O Loftsgaarden and Charles P Quesenberry. A Nonparametric Estimate of a Multivariate Density Function.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36(3):1049–1051, 1965

    work page 1965

  17. [17]

    Sequentially Constrained Monte Carlo.Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 97:98–113, 2016

    Shirin Golchi and David A Campbell. Sequentially Constrained Monte Carlo.Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 97:98–113, 2016

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Langevin dynamics with constraints and computation of free energy differences.Mathematics of computation, 81(280):2071–2125, 2012

    Tony Lelievre, Mathias Rousset, and Gabriel Stoltz. Langevin dynamics with constraints and computation of free energy differences.Mathematics of computation, 81(280):2071–2125, 2012

    work page 2071

  19. [19]

    A Family of MCMC Methods on Implicitly Defined Manifolds

    Marcus Brubaker, Mathieu Salzmann, and Raquel Urtasun. A Family of MCMC Methods on Implicitly Defined Manifolds. InArtificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 161–172. PMLR, 2012

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Geodesic Monte Carlo on Embedded Manifolds.Scandina- vian Journal of Statistics, 40(4):825–845, 2013

    Simon Byrne and Mark Girolami. Geodesic Monte Carlo on Embedded Manifolds.Scandina- vian Journal of Statistics, 40(4):825–845, 2013

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Sampling from a Log-Concave Distribution with Projected Langevin Monte Carlo.Discrete & Computational Geometry, 59(4):757–783, 2018

    Sébastien Bubeck, Ronen Eldan, and Joseph Lehec. Sampling from a Log-Concave Distribution with Projected Langevin Monte Carlo.Discrete & Computational Geometry, 59(4):757–783, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Sampling with Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in a Constrained Space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:31684–31696, 2022

    Yunbum Kook, Yin-Tat Lee, Ruoqi Shen, and Santosh Vempala. Sampling with Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in a Constrained Space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:31684–31696, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Constrained Stein Variational Trajectory Optimization

    Thomas Power and Dmitry Berenson. Constrained Stein Variational Trajectory Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 40:3602–3619, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    NLP Sampling: Combining MCMC and NLP Methods for Diverse Constrained Sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03035, 2024

    Marc Toussaint, Cornelius V Braun, and Joaquim Ortiz-Haro. NLP Sampling: Combining MCMC and NLP Methods for Diverse Constrained Sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03035, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Springer, 2019

    Francisco J Aragón, Miguel A Goberna, Marco A López, and Margarita ML Rodríguez.Non- linear Optimization. Springer, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Jongen, P

    Hubertus Th. Jongen, P. Jonker, and F. Twilt.Nonlinear Optimization in Finite Dimensions: Morse Theory, Chebyshev Approximation, Transversality, Flows, Parametric Aspects. Noncon- vex Optimization and Its Applications. Springer New York, 2000

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    Springer, 2015

    Gérard Biau and Luc Devroye.Lectures on the Nearest Neighbor Method, volume 246. Springer, 2015

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Andreani, G

    R. Andreani, G. Haeser, R.W. Prado, and L.D. Secchin. Primal-dual global convergence of an augmented Lagrangian method under the error bound condition. Technical report, University of São Paulo, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Allyn and Beacon, Boston, 1966

    James Dugundji.Topology. Allyn and Beacon, Boston, 1966

    work page 1966

  30. [30]

    Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal- Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz Condition

    Hamed Karimi, Julie Nutini, and Mark Schmidt. Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal- Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz Condition. In Paolo Frasconi, Niels Landwehr, Giuseppe Manco, and Jilles Vreeken, editors,Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 795–811. Springer International Publishing, 2016

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Sur les équations algébriques ayant toutes leurs racines réelles.Mathematica, 9(129-145):20, 1935

    Tiberiu Popoviciu. Sur les équations algébriques ayant toutes leurs racines réelles.Mathematica, 9(129-145):20, 1935

    work page 1935

  32. [32]

    Graphical Models, Exponential Families, and Variational Inference.Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 1(1-2):1–305, 2008

    Martin J Wainwright and Michael I Jordan. Graphical Models, Exponential Families, and Variational Inference.Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 1(1-2):1–305, 2008

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018

    James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Yash Katariya, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake VanderPlas, Skye Wanderman- Milne, and Qiao Zhang. JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018. 11

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    L. F. Kozachenko and N. N. Leonenko. Sample Estimate of the Entropy of a Random Vector. Problems of Information Transmission, 23(1-2):95–101, 1987

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Murray, Zexiang Li, and S

    Richard M. Murray, Zexiang Li, and S. Shankar Sastry.A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994. ISBN 978-1-315-13637-0

    work page 1994

  36. [36]

    CIC: Contrastive Intrinsic Control for Unsupervised Skill Discovery.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00161, 2022

    Michael Laskin, Hao Liu, Xue Bin Peng, Denis Yarats, Aravind Rajeswaran, and Pieter Abbeel. CIC: Contrastive Intrinsic Control for Unsupervised Skill Discovery.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00161, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Efficient multivariate entropy estimation via k-nearest neighbour distances.The Annals of Statistics, 47(1):288–318, 2019

    Thomas Beret, Richard Samworth, and Ming Yuan. Efficient multivariate entropy estimation via k-nearest neighbour distances.The Annals of Statistics, 47(1):288–318, 2019

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms

    Jasper Snoek, Hugo Larochelle, and Ryan Adams. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. In F. Pereira, C.J. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 25. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Approximate Nearest Neighbour Search on Dynamic Datasets: An Investigation

    Ben Harwood, Amir Dezfouli, Iadine Chades, and Conrad Sanderson. Approximate Nearest Neighbour Search on Dynamic Datasets: An Investigation. In Mingming Gong, Yiliao Song, Yun Sing Koh, Wei Xiang, and Derui Wang, editors,AI 2024: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, volume 15443, pages 95–106. Springer Nature Singapore, 2025

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    the met- ric cannot distinguish between a ground truth and a non-ground truth distribution

    Qiang Liu and Dilin Wang. Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithm. In D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 29. Curran Associates, Inc., 2016. 12 A Formal Lemmas and Proofs We begin by formalizing Lemma 1 introduced in Section...

    work page 2016