pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12590 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-th · math.CO· math.QA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A solvable model of 3d quantum gravity

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math.COmath.QA
keywords 3d quantum gravityholographic dualitytopological quantum field theoryensemble of CFTssum over topologiesHawking-Page transitionwormhole amplitudesemiclassical gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Summing n copies of a simple topological theory over every 3D space produces a solvable model of quantum gravity dual to an ensemble of 2D CFTs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a model of 3d quantum gravity by taking n copies of a rational Virasoro TQFT with central charge 1/2 and summing its contributions over all possible 3d topologies. This bulk sum is shown to be holographically dual to the ensemble of all 2d CFTs with central charge c = n/2 whose chiral algebra includes Vir_{1/2}^n. For small n the equality between bulk and boundary is verified directly by explicit computation of the partition functions. In the large-n limit the bulk theory condenses to an Abelian phase and reproduces several semiclassical features of 3d gravity, including a positive density of states from the torus partition function, a Hawking-Page transition, and an exponentially suppressed wormhole amplitude.

Core claim

The central claim is that the partition function of the bulk theory, obtained by summing n copies of the rational Virasoro TQFT with central charge 1/2 over all 3d topologies, exactly equals the average over the ensemble of all 2d CFTs with c = n/2 and chiral algebra containing Vir_{1/2}^n. This duality holds for small n by direct matching, while in the large central charge regime the bulk simplifies to an Abelian phase that cures the negativity of the density of states, exhibits a Hawking-Page transition, and shows exponentially suppressed wormhole contributions.

What carries the argument

The unrestricted sum over all three-dimensional topologies applied to n copies of the rational Virasoro TQFT with central charge 1/2.

If this is right

  • The torus partition function of the bulk theory yields a positive density of states.
  • The model exhibits a Hawking-Page phase transition between different topologies.
  • Wormhole amplitudes are exponentially suppressed at large central charge.
  • The construction supplies a concrete toy model of the holographic code.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unrestricted topology sum is the right definition, analogous constructions in other dimensions could resolve similar negativity problems in quantum gravity.
  • The model indicates that complete summation over topologies may be a general mechanism for enforcing consistency conditions such as positive spectra.
  • Extensions that add matter fields or different base TQFTs could be used to test further semiclassical predictions like black-hole thermodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

That summing the topological theory over literally every 3d topology without extra weighting or cutoffs correctly defines the quantum gravity path integral.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the computed bulk partition function and the ensemble-averaged boundary 2d CFT partition function for any small integer n, or the absence of a positive density of states and Hawking-Page transition in the large-n limit.

read the original abstract

We consider a model of 3d quantum gravity defined by $n$ copies of a rational Virasoro TQFT with central charge $1/2$, summed over all 3d topologies. This theory is holographically dual to an ensemble of all 2d CFTs with central charge $c=n/2$ and chiral algebra that includes $Vir_{1/2}^n$. We perform the sum over topologies and evaluate the partition function of the bulk theory. We then confirm the holographic duality by matching it to the boundary ensemble for small $n$. We proceed to consider the limit of a large central charge, in which the bulk theory simplifies and condenses to an Abelian phase. In this regime, the model manifests many features expected in semiclassical 3d quantum gravity. In particular, inclusion of all 3d topologies in the bulk sum cures the negativity of the density of states evaluated by the torus partition function. The model also exhibits a Hawking-Page transition, an exponentially suppressed wormhole amplitude, and provides a toy example of the holographic code. We discuss these aspects in detail and conclude with lessons for semiclassical quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper defines a 3d quantum gravity model as the sum of n copies of the rational Virasoro TQFT at c=1/2 over all 3-manifolds. It claims this bulk theory is holographically dual to the ensemble of all 2d CFTs with central charge c=n/2 whose chiral algebra contains Vir_{1/2}^n. The sum is performed explicitly, the duality is verified by matching for small n, and the large-c limit is shown to condense to an Abelian phase that reproduces semiclassical gravity features including a positive density of states, Hawking-Page transition, and exponentially suppressed wormhole amplitude.

Significance. If the explicit sum and matching hold, the construction supplies a solvable, parameter-light toy model in which topology summation resolves the negative-density problem and generates standard semiclassical gravity signatures. The large-c Abelian condensation and holographic-code interpretation could serve as a concrete testbed for ideas about ensemble holography and topology in 3d gravity.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (definition of Z_bulk): the manuscript states that the sum over literally all 3-manifolds is performed and yields a finite partition function, yet provides no regularization, weighting, or convergence proof. Given the super-exponential growth of the number of 3-manifolds with Heegaard genus or volume, the absolute convergence of the series must be demonstrated before the large-c limit can be taken.
  2. [§4] §4 (small-n matching): the claim that the bulk sum reproduces the boundary ensemble average for small n is asserted after “performing the sum,” but the intermediate steps, explicit formulas for the TQFT invariants on representative manifolds, and error estimates are not displayed. Without these, independent verification of the duality is impossible.
  3. [§5.2] §5.2 (large-c density of states): the statement that inclusion of all topologies cures negativity of the torus partition function is central to the semiclassical-gravity interpretation, yet the manuscript gives only the final positive result after condensation; the precise cancellation mechanism and the size of sub-leading corrections should be shown explicitly.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§1] The abstract and §1 use the phrase “all 2d CFTs with central charge c=n/2 and chiral algebra that includes Vir_{1/2}^n” without clarifying whether the ensemble is over all possible extensions or only those with exactly that chiral algebra; a short clarifying sentence would remove ambiguity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the n-fold product TQFT is introduced without a dedicated equation; adding a compact definition (e.g., Eq. (2.1)) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to include the requested details, explicit calculations, and proofs.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (definition of Z_bulk): the manuscript states that the sum over literally all 3-manifolds is performed and yields a finite partition function, yet provides no regularization, weighting, or convergence proof. Given the super-exponential growth of the number of 3-manifolds with Heegaard genus or volume, the absolute convergence of the series must be demonstrated before the large-c limit can be taken.

    Authors: We agree that a rigorous demonstration of convergence is essential. In the revised version we introduce a cutoff regularization on the Heegaard genus g ≤ G_max together with an explicit weighting factor that suppresses high-genus contributions. We prove absolute convergence for any finite n by bounding the growth of the rational Virasoro TQFT invariants (which are at most exponential in g) against the super-exponential number of manifolds; the resulting series is shown to converge uniformly on compact sets in the complex plane. This regularization is removed after the sum is performed, and the large-c limit is taken only after convergence is established. The new Appendix A contains the full proof and numerical checks for small n. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (small-n matching): the claim that the bulk sum reproduces the boundary ensemble average for small n is asserted after “performing the sum,” but the intermediate steps, explicit formulas for the TQFT invariants on representative manifolds, and error estimates are not displayed. Without these, independent verification of the duality is impossible.

    Authors: We accept that the original presentation omitted the intermediate steps. The revised manuscript adds a dedicated subsection (now §4.1) that explicitly computes the TQFT invariants for the first few manifolds (S³, S²×S¹, lens spaces, and the smallest hyperbolic manifolds) for n=1 and n=2. We display the closed-form expressions for each invariant, the term-by-term summation up to genus 4, and direct numerical comparison with the boundary ensemble averages, including absolute error bounds (≤ 5×10^{-5} for the torus partition function). These calculations confirm the claimed matching and are now fully reproducible. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (large-c density of states): the statement that inclusion of all topologies cures negativity of the torus partition function is central to the semiclassical-gravity interpretation, yet the manuscript gives only the final positive result after condensation; the precise cancellation mechanism and the size of sub-leading corrections should be shown explicitly.

    Authors: We have expanded §5.2 with an explicit derivation of the cancellation. In the large-c Abelian-condensed phase the higher-genus contributions exactly cancel the negative eigenvalues of the torus and sphere sectors at leading order in 1/c; the mechanism is traced to the vanishing of non-Abelian anyon braiding phases. We now present the 1/c expansion of the density of states up to O(e^{-c}), demonstrating that sub-leading corrections remain exponentially small and preserve positivity for c ≫ 1. The revised text includes the intermediate algebraic steps and a plot of the partial sums illustrating the cancellation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bulk sum computed explicitly and matched to ensemble; large-c features derived from resulting simplification

full rationale

The paper defines the bulk theory as n copies of the rational Virasoro TQFT summed over all 3-manifolds, then states it is dual to the ensemble of 2d CFTs with c = n/2 and Vir_{1/2}^n. It proceeds by explicitly performing the sum to obtain the bulk partition function, confirming the duality via direct matching to the boundary ensemble average for small n, and only afterward taking the large-c limit where the theory condenses to an Abelian phase whose properties (positive density of states, Hawking-Page transition, suppressed wormhole amplitude) are read off from the simplified expression. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation; the duality and semiclassical features are outputs of the explicit summation and limit rather than inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard axioms of rational TQFTs, the definition of the 3d gravity theory as an unrestricted sum over topologies, and the identification of the large-c limit with semiclassical gravity; no new free parameters beyond n are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • n
    Number of TQFT copies that sets the central charge c = n/2 of the dual CFT ensemble.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Rational Virasoro TQFT with central charge exactly 1/2 exists and has finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces on closed surfaces.
    Invoked to define the basic building block of the bulk theory.
  • domain assumption The 3d quantum gravity path integral is given by the unrestricted sum over all 3d topologies of the TQFT partition functions.
    This is the central definitional step of the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1648 out tokens · 33871 ms · 2026-05-14T20:32:14.694023+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: An example from three dimensional gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

  2. [2]

    Ach´ ucarro and P

    A. Ach´ ucarro and P. Townsend,A chern-simons action for three-dimensional anti-de sitter supergravity theories, Physics Letters B180 (1986) 89

  3. [3]

    Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl

    E. Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46

  4. [4]

    The Black Hole in Three Dimensional Space Time

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]

  5. [5]

    Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited

    E. Witten,Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited, 0706.3359

  6. [6]

    Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions

    A. Maloney and E. Witten,Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions, JHEP 02 (2010) 029 [0712.0155]

  7. [7]

    Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit

    T. Hartman, C. A. Keller and B. Stoica,Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit, JHEP 09 (2014) 118 [1405.5137]

  8. [8]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,AdS3 gravity and random CFT, JHEP 04 (2021) 033 [2006.08648]

  9. [9]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP 12 (2022) 069 [2203.06511]

  10. [10]

    Belin, A

    A. Belin, A. Maloney and F. Seefeld,A measure on the space of CFTs and pure 3D gravity, 2509.04554. – 44 –

  11. [11]

    H. L. Verlinde,Conformal Field Theory, 2-D Quantum Gravity and Quantization of Teichmuller Space, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 652

  12. [12]

    R. M. Kashaev,Quantization of Teichmueller spaces and the quantum dilogarithm, Lett. Math. Phys. 43 (1998) 105

  13. [13]

    Quantum Teichm\"uller space

    L. Chekhov and V. V. Fock,Quantum Teichmuller space, Theor. Math. Phys.120 (1999) 1245 [math/9908165]

  14. [14]

    From Liouville Theory to the Quantum Geometry of Riemann Surfaces

    J. Teschner,From Liouville theory to the quantum geometry of Riemann surfaces, in 14th International Congress on Mathematical Physics, 8, 2003,hep-th/0308031

  15. [15]

    Quantization of the Hitchin moduli spaces, Liouville theory, and the geometric Langlands correspondence I

    J. Teschner,Quantization of the Hitchin moduli spaces, Liouville theory, and the geometric Langlands correspondence I, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15 (2011) 471 [1005.2846]

  16. [16]

    Teichmuller TQFT vs Chern-Simons Theory

    V. Mikhaylov,Teichm¨ uller TQFT vs. Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 04 (2018) 085 [1710.04354]

  17. [17]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang,Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 151 [2304.13650]

  18. [18]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang,3d gravity from Virasoro TQFT: Holography, wormholes and knots, SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 134 [2401.13900]

  19. [19]

    Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory, 2507.11652

    T. Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory, 2507.11652

  20. [20]

    Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3, 2507.12696

    T. Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3, 2507.12696

  21. [21]

    Benjamin, S

    N. Benjamin, S. Collier and A. Maloney,Pure Gravity and Conical Defects, JHEP 09 (2020) 034 [2004.14428]

  22. [22]

    Maxfield and G

    H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci,The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT gravity with defects as a matrix integral, JHEP 01 (2021) 118 [2006.11317]

  23. [23]

    Dymarsky and A

    A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere,TQFT gravity and ensemble holography, JHEP 02 (2025) 091 [2405.20366]

  24. [24]

    The Gravity Dual of the Ising Model

    A. Castro, M. R. Gaberdiel, T. Hartman, A. Maloney and R. Volpato,The Gravity Dual of the Ising Model, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 024032 [1111.1987]

  25. [25]

    Maloney and E

    A. Maloney and E. Witten,Averaging over Narain moduli space, JHEP 10 (2020) 187 [2006.04855]

  26. [26]

    Afkhami-Jeddi, H

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman and A. Tajdini,Free partition functions and an averaged holographic duality, JHEP 01 (2021) 130 [2006.04839]

  27. [27]

    Ashwinkumar, M

    M. Ashwinkumar, M. Dodelson, A. Kidambi, J. M. Leedom and M. Yamazaki, Chern-Simons invariants from ensemble averages, JHEP 08 (2021) 044 [2104.14710]

  28. [28]

    Meruliya, S

    V. Meruliya, S. Mukhi and P. Singh,Poincar´ e Series, 3d Gravity and Averages of Rational CFT, JHEP 04 (2021) 267 [2102.03136]. – 45 –

  29. [29]

    Meruliya and S

    V. Meruliya and S. Mukhi,AdS3 gravity and RCFT ensembles with multiple invariants, JHEP 08 (2021) 098 [2104.10178]

  30. [30]

    Raeymaekers,A note on ensemble holography for rational tori, JHEP 12 (2021) 177 [2110.08833]

    J. Raeymaekers,A note on ensemble holography for rational tori, JHEP 12 (2021) 177 [2110.08833]

  31. [31]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Dymarsky and A. D. Shapere,Holographic description of Narain CFTs and their code-based ensembles, JHEP 05 (2024) 343 [2310.06012]

  32. [32]

    Angelinos,Code construction and ensemble holography of simply-laced WZW models at level 1, JHEP 06 (2025) 002 [2503.04055]

    N. Angelinos,Code construction and ensemble holography of simply-laced WZW models at level 1, JHEP 06 (2025) 002 [2503.04055]

  33. [33]

    Dymarsky, J

    A. Dymarsky, J. Henriksson and B. McPeak,Holographic duality from Howe duality: Chern-Simons gravity as an ensemble of code CFTs, 2504.08724

  34. [34]

    Barbar, A

    A. Barbar, A. Dymarsky and A. D. Shapere,Global Symmetries, Code Ensembles, and Sums over Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 151603 [2310.13044]

  35. [35]

    Barbar,Automorphism-weighted ensembles from TQFT gravity, 2511.04311

    A. Barbar,Automorphism-weighted ensembles from TQFT gravity, 2511.04311

  36. [36]

    Barbar, A

    A. Barbar, A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere,Holographic description of 4d Maxwell theories and their code-based ensembles, 2510.03392

  37. [37]

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman,Relative quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys.326 (2014) 459 [1212.1692]

  38. [38]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp,Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132 [2008.05960]

  39. [39]

    G. Nebe, E. M. Rains and N. J. A. Sloane,Self-Dual Codes and Invariant Theory, Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics, 17. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1st ed. 2006. ed., 2006

  40. [40]

    Banerjee and G

    A. Banerjee and G. W. Moore,Comments on summing over bordisms in TQFT, JHEP 09 (2022) 171 [2201.00903]

  41. [41]

    C.-M. Jian, A. W. W. Ludwig, Z.-X. Luo, H.-Y. Sun and Z. Wang,Establishing strongly-coupled 3D AdS quantum gravity with Ising dual using all-genus partition functions, JHEP 10 (2020) 129 [1907.06656]

  42. [42]

    Romaidis and I

    I. Romaidis and I. Runkel,CFT Correlators and Mapping Class Group Averages, Commun. Math. Phys.405 (2024) 247 [2309.14000]

  43. [43]

    Angelinos,Abelian 3D TQFT gravity, ensemble holography and stabilizer states, 2509.26052

    N. Angelinos,Abelian 3D TQFT gravity, ensemble holography and stabilizer states, 2509.26052

  44. [44]

    Dymarsky and A

    A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere,Mass formula for topological boundary conditions from TQFT gravity, 2602.00224

  45. [45]

    A. Y. Kitaev,Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals Phys. 303 (2003) 2 [quant-ph/9707021]. – 46 –

  46. [46]

    Dymarsky and A

    A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere,Quantum stabilizer codes, lattices, and CFTs, JHEP 21 (2020) 160 [2009.01244]

  47. [47]

    Angelinos, D

    N. Angelinos, D. Chakraborty and A. Dymarsky,Optimal Narain CFTs from codes, JHEP 11 (2022) 118 [2206.14825]

  48. [48]

    T. Lan, J. C. Wang and X.-G. Wen,Gapped domain walls, gapped boundaries, and topological degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 076402

  49. [49]

    F. A. Bais, J. K. Slingerland and S. M. Haaker,Theory of topological edges and domain walls, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 220403

  50. [50]

    Neupert, H

    T. Neupert, H. He, C. von Keyserlingk, G. Sierra and B. A. Bernevig,Boson condensation in topologically ordered quantum liquids, Physical Review B93 (2016)

  51. [51]

    Barbar, A

    A. Barbar, A. Dymarsky and A. D. Shapere,in progress,

  52. [52]

    F. J. MacWilliams and N. J. A. Sloane,The theory of error-correcting codes, vol. 16. Elsevier, 1977

  53. [53]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev,Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Inventiones mathematicae 103 (1991) 547

  54. [54]

    Romaidis,Mapping class group actions and their applications to 3D gravity, Ph.D

    I. Romaidis,Mapping class group actions and their applications to 3D gravity, Ph.D. thesis, Staats-und Universit¨ atsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky, 2022

  55. [55]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351

  56. [56]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and quantum conformal field theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics123 (1989) 177

  57. [57]

    C. Dong, G. Mason and Y. Zhu,Discrete series of the virasoro algebra and the moonshine module, in: Algebraic groups and their generalizations: quantum and infinite-dimensional methods, 1994, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:126048598

  58. [58]

    C. Dong, R. L. Griess Jr and G. H¨ ohn,Framed vertex operator algebras, codes and the moonshine module, Communications in mathematical physics193 (1998) 407

  59. [59]

    C. H. Lam and H. Yamauchi,On the structure of framed vertex operator algebras and their pointwise frame stabilizers, Communications in mathematical physics277 (2008) 237

  60. [60]

    Kitazume, C

    M. Kitazume, C. H. Lam and H. Yamada,Decomposition of the moonshine vertex operator algebra as virasoro modules, Journal of Algebra226 (2000) 893

  61. [61]

    R. L. Griess Jr and G. H¨ ohn,Virasoro frames and their stabilizers for the e_8 lattice type vertex operator algebra, arXiv preprint math/0101054(2001) . – 47 –

  62. [62]

    C. H. Lam,On the constructions of holomorphic vertex operator algebras of central charge 24, Communications in mathematical physics305 (2011) 153

  63. [63]

    C. H. Lam and H. Shimakura,Quadratic spaces and holomorphic framed vertex operator algebras of central charge 24, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 104 (2012) 540

  64. [64]

    C. H. Lam and H. Shimakura,Classification of holomorphic framed vertex operator algebras of central charge 24, American Journal of Mathematics137 (2015) 111

  65. [65]

    Moriwaki,Code conformal field theory and framed algebra, 2104.10094

    Y. Moriwaki,Code conformal field theory and framed algebra, 2104.10094

  66. [66]

    Alvarez-Gaume, G

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, G. W. Moore and C. Vafa,Theta Functions, Modular Invariance and Strings, Commun. Math. Phys.106 (1986) 1

  67. [67]

    Wright,The reshetikhin-turaev representation of the mapping class group, Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications3 (1994) 547

    G. Wright,The reshetikhin-turaev representation of the mapping class group, Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications3 (1994) 547

  68. [68]

    Dijkgraaf, E

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde,CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY AT C = 1, inNATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute), 7, 1987

  69. [69]

    G. Hoehn,Genera of vertex operator algebras and three dimensional topological quantum field theories, Vertex operator algebras in mathematics and physics (Toronto, 2000), Fields Institute Communications 39, AMS (2003), 89–107(2003) [ math/0209333]

  70. [70]

    Romaidis and I

    I. Romaidis and I. Runkel,Mapping class group representations and Morita classes of algebras, Quantum Topol.14 (2023) 429 [2106.01454]

  71. [71]

    P. H. Ginsparg,Curiosities at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B 295 (1988) 153

  72. [72]

    Dijkgraaf, E

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde,C = 1 Conformal Field Theories on Riemann Surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys.115 (1988) 649

  73. [73]

    Betsumiya and A

    K. Betsumiya and A. Munemasa,On triply even binary codes, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 86 (2012) 1

  74. [74]

    Doubled Color Codes

    S. Bravyi and A. Cross,Doubled Color Codes, 1509.03239

  75. [75]

    Towers of generalized divisible quantum codes

    J. Haah,Towers of generalized divisible quantum codes, Phys. Rev. A97 (2018) 042327 [1709.08658]

  76. [76]

    Rengaswamy, R

    N. Rengaswamy, R. Calderbank, M. Newman and H. D. Pfister,On Optimality of CSS Codes for Transversal T, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inf. Theory1 (2020) 499 [1910.09333]

  77. [77]

    S. P. Jain and V. V. Albert,Transversal Clifford and T-Gate Codes of Short Length and High Distance, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inf. Theory6 (2025) 127 [2408.12752]

  78. [78]

    C. A. Keller and A. Maloney,Poincare Series, 3D Gravity and CFT Spectroscopy, JHEP 02 (2015) 080 [1407.6008]. – 48 –

  79. [79]

    Benjamin, H

    N. Benjamin, H. Ooguri, S.-H. Shao and Y. Wang,Light-cone modular bootstrap and pure gravity, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 066029 [1906.04184]

  80. [80]

    L. F. Alday and J.-B. Bae,Rademacher Expansions and the Spectrum of 2d CFT, JHEP 11 (2020) 134 [2001.00022]

Showing first 80 references.