pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13070 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🧬 q-bio.CB · physics.bio-ph· q-bio.TO

Recognition: no theorem link

3D mechano-geometric multicellular model of apical stem cell-driven plant morphogenesis

Koichi Fujimoto, Naoya Kamamoto

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.CB physics.bio-phq-bio.TO
keywords plant morphogenesiscell division orientation3D multicellular modelmechano-geometric frameworkapical stem cellscell wall growthtissue mechanics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 3D mechano-geometric model combines cell mechanics and division rules to test the origins of symmetric plant body plans.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a three-dimensional computational model for plant morphogenesis driven by apical stem cells. It integrates realistic mechanics of individual cells with irreversible growth of cell walls and the overall deformable shape of the tissue. Using a triangulated thin-shell approach, the model tracks turgor pressure, wall elasticity, and strain-induced growth. A cell division algorithm allows plugging in different orientation rules to see their effects on symmetry. The goal is to provide biologists with a customizable tool to investigate how simple rules lead to complex three-dimensional structures.

Core claim

This modeling framework demonstrates that combining three-dimensional cell mechanics, irreversible cell-wall growth, and deformable tissue geometry enables direct testing of whether a simple division orientation rule can establish symmetric body plans in plants. The implementation details cover the triangulated representation of cells, handling of mechanical forces, growth dynamics, division procedures, and mesh maintenance operations.

What carries the argument

The triangulated thin-shell representation of cells, together with strain-driven wall growth and pluggable cell-division orientation rules.

If this is right

  • If the model is accurate, simple geometric rules for cell division can produce symmetric three-dimensional plant forms without additional patterning mechanisms.
  • The framework allows simulation of how mechanical stresses influence growth and division in multicellular tissues.
  • Experimental biologists can customize the division rules to match observations from specific plant species or mutants.
  • Remeshing ensures numerical stability as the tissue deforms over many cell divisions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Connecting this model to gene regulatory networks could reveal how molecular cues interact with mechanical forces during development.
  • Similar approaches might apply to animal tissues where cell mechanics also drive shape changes.
  • Quantitative comparisons between model outputs and live imaging data would identify which aspects of division rules are most critical for symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The triangulated thin-shell model with its specific laws for elasticity and strain-driven growth sufficiently represents the mechanical properties of real plant cells and walls.

What would settle it

Live imaging of dividing plant cells showing division orientations or growth patterns that consistently deviate from the model's predictions under equivalent mechanical conditions would falsify the framework's core assumptions.

read the original abstract

The orientation of cell division is a major determinant of three-dimensional plant morphogenesis. Whether and how a simple division orientation rule explains the establishment of symmetric body plans is a fundamental question. Testing such hypotheses is facilitated by a modeling framework that combines realistic three-dimensional cell mechanics, irreversible cell-wall growth, and a deformable tissue geometry. We recently introduced such a framework, a 3D mechano-geometric multicellular model of apical stem cell-driven morphogenesis. Here we document how the model is built from physiological and computational perspectives. We describe the triangulated thin-shell representation of cells, the treatment of turgor pressure, cell-wall elasticity and strain-driven wall growth, the cell-division algorithm together with its two pluggable division-rule implementations, and the remeshing operations that keep the triangulation well-conditioned as cells grow, divide, and deform. The aim of this paper is to make the present model accessible and customizable to experimental plant biologists.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript documents the construction of a 3D mechano-geometric multicellular model for apical stem cell-driven plant morphogenesis. It details a triangulated thin-shell representation of cells, treatment of turgor pressure as an internal force, linear or hyperelastic constitutive relations for wall elasticity, strain-driven irreversible growth, a cell-division algorithm with two pluggable orientation-rule implementations, and remeshing operations to maintain triangulation quality during growth and division. The central claim is that this framework enables testing whether simple division-orientation rules can produce symmetric body plans.

Significance. If the mechanical core proves faithful, the framework supplies a customizable, mechanically grounded platform for in silico hypothesis testing in 3D plant morphogenesis, directly linking cell-level mechanics to tissue-scale outcomes. The open documentation and pluggable rules are practical strengths that could accelerate experimental validation by biologists.

major comments (2)
  1. [mechanical model section] Thin-shell cell representation (mechanical model section): the reduction of cell walls to a 2D triangulated surface with chosen constitutive laws cannot represent through-thickness stress gradients or the mechanics of new wall insertion at division planes. Because real walls are thick, anisotropic, and multi-layered, this approximation risks distorting cell shapes, division timing, and tissue stresses, rendering conclusions about the division rule inconclusive.
  2. [results or methods validation subsection] Absence of validation (results or methods validation subsection): no quantitative comparison of predicted cell geometries, wall stresses, or growth rates against experimental measurements is provided. Since the central claim requires the simulated outcomes to reflect biological behavior rather than modeling artifacts, independent validation of the mechanical predictions is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [growth implementation] Equation notation for strain-driven growth: several symbols (e.g., the precise definition of the growth tensor) are introduced without an explicit reference table or prior definition, complicating reproducibility.
  2. [figures] Figure captions: several panels lack explicit parameter values or mesh-resolution details used in the displayed simulations, reducing clarity for readers attempting to replicate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript documenting the 3D mechano-geometric multicellular model. We address each major comment point by point below, with revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation of the framework's assumptions and scope.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [mechanical model section] Thin-shell cell representation (mechanical model section): the reduction of cell walls to a 2D triangulated surface with chosen constitutive laws cannot represent through-thickness stress gradients or the mechanics of new wall insertion at division planes. Because real walls are thick, anisotropic, and multi-layered, this approximation risks distorting cell shapes, division timing, and tissue stresses, rendering conclusions about the division rule inconclusive.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the thin-shell approximation, while computationally tractable, does not capture through-thickness stress gradients or the detailed mechanics of new wall insertion at division planes. Real cell walls are indeed thick, anisotropic, and multi-layered. This is a standard simplification in 3D multicellular plant models to enable simulation of large tissue deformations while retaining key mechanical features such as turgor-driven expansion and strain-based growth. The constitutive laws (linear or hyperelastic) and growth rules are drawn from established plant biomechanics literature. We will revise the mechanical model section to include an expanded discussion of these limitations, their potential influence on predicted cell shapes and tissue stresses, and why the approximation remains suitable for testing whether simple division-orientation rules can generate symmetric body plans. This addition will clarify the scope without changing the core implementation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [results or methods validation subsection] Absence of validation (results or methods validation subsection): no quantitative comparison of predicted cell geometries, wall stresses, or growth rates against experimental measurements is provided. Since the central claim requires the simulated outcomes to reflect biological behavior rather than modeling artifacts, independent validation of the mechanical predictions is load-bearing.

    Authors: This manuscript is a documentation of the modeling framework (as stated in the abstract: 'The aim of this paper is to make the present model accessible and customizable to experimental plant biologists'), not a validation study. The central claim is that the integrated framework enables in silico testing of division rules; it does not assert quantitative predictive accuracy for specific biological systems. Mechanical parameters are selected from published experimental values on turgor pressure, wall elasticity, and growth rates. We will revise by adding a dedicated subsection on parameter selection with references to experimental literature and by outlining a roadmap for future quantitative validation against cell geometries and growth data. This addresses the concern while preserving the paper's primary purpose as a methods resource. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Model documentation paper with one minor non-load-bearing self-citation to prior framework introduction

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We recently introduced such a framework, a 3D mechano-geometric multicellular model of apical stem cell-driven morphogenesis."

    The sentence cites the authors' own prior work for the existence of the modeling framework. Because the present paper is explicitly a documentation and accessibility document rather than a derivation that relies on that citation to establish its central claims, the self-citation is minor and non-load-bearing; it does not reduce any prediction or result to the citation itself.

full rationale

The manuscript is a construction and documentation document for a triangulated thin-shell multicellular model. It describes physiological and computational components (turgor, wall elasticity, strain-driven growth, division rules, remeshing) without performing any parameter fitting followed by prediction of the same quantities, without self-referential definitions, and without importing uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work to force the present results. The single self-reference ('We recently introduced such a framework') simply points to the originating publication and does not serve as the sole justification for any claim or derivation inside this paper. The mechanical modeling choices are presented as modeling decisions, not as outputs derived from the target biological conclusions. Consequently the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits only the expected minor self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard continuum-mechanics assumptions for thin shells and on domain-specific choices for wall growth and division orientation; without the full text the exact free parameters cannot be enumerated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cell walls behave as thin elastic shells whose growth is driven by strain
    Invoked in the description of wall elasticity and strain-driven growth
  • domain assumption Turgor pressure can be treated as a uniform internal force on the shell
    Stated as part of the treatment of turgor pressure

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1201 out tokens · 32097 ms · 2026-05-14T01:48:20.110347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Biquadratic and

    Delingette, Hervé , editor =. Biquadratic and. Biomedical. 2008 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70521-5_5 , abstract =

  2. [2]

    PLOS Computational Biology , author =

    Stress and. PLOS Computational Biology , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003410 , abstract =

  3. [3]

    International Journal of Plant Sciences , author =

    Rhizophore and. International Journal of Plant Sciences , author =. 1996 , pages =

  4. [4]

    Phil Trans R Soc B , author =

    Development and genetics in the evolution of land plant body plans , volume =. Phil Trans R Soc B , author =. 2017 , pages =

  5. [5]

    Three-dimensional growth: a developmental innovation that facilitated plant terrestrialization , journal =

    Moody, Laura A , year =. Three-dimensional growth: a developmental innovation that facilitated plant terrestrialization , journal =

  6. [6]

    Plant and Cell Physiology , author =

    Formative. Plant and Cell Physiology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcs175 , abstract =

  7. [7]

    Current Biology , author =

    Local. Current Biology , author =. 2009 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.050 , language =

  8. [8]

    Trends in Plant Science , author =

    Phyllotaxis from a. Trends in Plant Science , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2020.09.014 , abstract =

  9. [9]

    Essays in Biochemistry , author =

    Unravelling. Essays in Biochemistry , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1042/EBC20220048 , abstract =

  10. [10]

    Advance in Bryology , author =

    Morphology/anatomy of. Advance in Bryology , author =. 1981 , pages =

  11. [11]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    Phylogeny and diversification of bryophytes , volume =. American Journal of Botany , author =. 2004 , keywords =. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1557 , abstract =

  12. [12]

    , editor =

    Dolzblasz, Alicja and Myśkow, Elżbieta and Gola, Edyta M. , editor =. Meristems of. Current. 2018 , doi =

  13. [13]

    and Foster, Adriance S

    Gifford, Ernest M. and Foster, Adriance S. , month = feb, year =. Morphology and

  14. [14]

    Bull Soc Bot Fr , author =

    La theorie des initiales chez les hepatiques à feuilles , volume =. Bull Soc Bot Fr , author =. 1925 , pages =

  15. [15]

    Annu Rev Plant Physiol , author =

    Concept of apical cells in bryophytes and pteridophytes , volume =. Annu Rev Plant Physiol , author =. 1983 , pages =

  16. [16]

    Acta Biotheor , author =

    Apical cells as meristems , volume =. Acta Biotheor , author =. 1993 , pages =

  17. [17]

    Journal of Plant Research , author =

    Rotation angle of stem cell division plane controls spiral phyllotaxis in mosses , volume =. Journal of Plant Research , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10265-021-01298-0 , abstract =

  18. [18]

    , year =

    Errera, L. , year =. Sur une condition fondamentale d’ equilibre des cellules vivantes , url =

  19. [19]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    The. American Journal of Botany , author =. 1980 , pages =. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07764.x , abstract =

  20. [20]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    Orientation of the. American Journal of Botany , author =. 1980 , pages =. doi:10.2307/2442293 , abstract =

  21. [21]

    , volume =

    Nucleus-associated microtubules help determine the division plane of plant epidermal cells: avoidance of four-way junctions and the role of cell geometry. , volume =. Journal of Cell Biology , author =. 1990 , keywords =. doi:10.1083/jcb.110.4.1111 , abstract =

  22. [22]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Coordination of plant cell division and expansion in a simple morphogenetic system , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906322107 , abstract =

  23. [23]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Universal rule for the symmetric division of plant cells , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2011 , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011866108 , abstract =

  24. [24]

    PLoS computational biology , author =

    Cell geometry determines symmetric and asymmetric division plane selection in. PLoS computational biology , author =. 2019 , keywords =

  25. [25]

    2022 , keywords =

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2117803119 , abstract =

  26. [26]

    Dev Cell , author =

    Genetic control of plant development by overriding a geometric division rule , volume =. Dev Cell , author =. 2014 , pages =

  27. [27]

    2023 , pages =

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2210632120 , abstract =

  28. [28]

    2024 , pmid =

    Current Biology , author =. 2024 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.08.038 , language =

  29. [29]

    Current Opinion in Plant Biology , author =

    The mechanics behind cell division , volume =. Current Opinion in Plant Biology , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.10.011 , abstract =

  30. [30]

    Developmental Cell , author =

    Mechanical forces in plant tissue matrix orient cell divisions via microtubule stabilization , volume =. Developmental Cell , author =. 2024 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2024.03.009 , language =

  31. [31]

    Current Biology , author =

    Mechanical forces instruct division plane orientation of cambium stem cells during radial growth in. Current Biology , author =. 2024 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.046 , language =

  32. [32]

    American Fern Journal , author =

    An. American Fern Journal , author =. 1977 , pages =. doi:10.2307/1546767 , number =

  33. [33]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    Patterns of. American Journal of Botany , author =. 1976 , pages =. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1976.tb11862.x , abstract =

  34. [34]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Stiffness transitions in new walls post-cell division differ between. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2302985120 , abstract =

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Forces behind plant cell division , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1609309113 , number =

  36. [36]

    The Plant Cell , author =

    Predicting. The Plant Cell , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1105/tpc.18.00401 , abstract =

  37. [37]

    2015 , keywords =

    eLife , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.7554/eLife.05864 , abstract =

  38. [38]

    The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi , author =

    Developmental anatomy of the shoot apical cell, rhizophore and root. The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi , author =. 1989 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF02488120 , abstract =

  39. [39]

    Annals of Botany , author =

    Angle. Annals of Botany , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088352 , abstract =

  40. [40]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    Cell. American Journal of Botany , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.2307/2445894 , abstract =

  41. [41]

    2021 , keywords =

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.3390/ijms22052626 , abstract =

  42. [42]

    Trends in Plant Science , author =

    Mechanics and modeling of plant cell growth , volume =. Trends in Plant Science , author =. 2009 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.07.006 , language =

  43. [43]

    Science Advances , author =

    Cellular shape reinforces niche to stem cell signaling in the small intestine , volume =. Science Advances , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm1847 , abstract =

  44. [44]

    Visualization

    Ahrens, James and Geveci, Berk and Law, Charles , month = jan, year =. Visualization. doi:10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1 , pages =

  45. [45]

    SIAM Review , author =

    Julia:. SIAM Review , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1137/141000671 , abstract =

  46. [46]

    Plant Physiology , author =

    Cellular and gene expression patterns associated with root bifurcation in. Plant Physiology , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac402 , abstract =

  47. [47]

    Genes , author =

    Development and. Genes , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.3390/genes11121455 , abstract =

  48. [48]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Towards an understanding of spiral patterning in the. Scientific Reports , author =. 2017 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13767-5 , abstract =

  49. [49]

    Current Biology , author =

    A. Current Biology , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.025 , abstract =

  50. [50]

    Science , author =

    Generation of. Science , author =. 2011 , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1202185 , number =

  51. [51]

    Science , author =

    The preprophase band of microtubules controls the robustness of division orientation in plants , volume =. Science , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aal3016 , abstract =

  52. [52]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Cortical tension overrides geometrical cues to orient microtubules in confined protoplasts , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2008895117 , abstract =

  53. [53]

    Planta , author =

    Evidence for division and polarity in apical cells of bryophytes and pteridophytes , volume =. Planta , author =. 1978 , pages =

  54. [54]

    Current Biology , author =

    Microtubule-. Current Biology , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.076 , abstract =

  55. [55]

    Annual Review of Plant Biology , author =

    Comparative. Annual Review of Plant Biology , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-082520-094112 , abstract =

  56. [56]

    Mathematical Programming , author =

    On the limited memory. Mathematical Programming , author =. 1989 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF01589116 , abstract =

  57. [57]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Mechanical constraints imposed by. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1404616111 , abstract =

  58. [58]

    Morphology and

    Hasebe, Mitsuyasu , month = jul, year =. Morphology and

  59. [59]

    Studien über protoplasmamechanik , publisher =

    Berthold, Gottfried , year =. Studien über protoplasmamechanik , publisher =

  60. [60]

    Reess, Max , year =. Zur

  61. [61]

    American Journal of Botany , author =

    The self-replicating cellular organization of shoot apical meristems , volume =. American Journal of Botany , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/ajb2.70027 , abstract =

  62. [62]

    2025 , pages =

    Plant and Cell Physiology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcaf171 , abstract =

  63. [63]

    European Journal of Cell Biology , author =

    Redundant mechanisms in division plane positioning , volume =. European Journal of Cell Biology , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151308 , abstract =

  64. [64]

    Front Plant Sci , author =

    Ferns: the missing link in shoot evolution and development , volume =. Front Plant Sci , author =. 2015 , pages =

  65. [65]

    Evolutionary

    Kato, Masahiro , year =. Evolutionary

  66. [66]

    Physical Biology , author =

    A continuous growth model for plant tissue , volume =. Physical Biology , author =. 2016 , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/13/6/065002 , abstract =

  67. [67]

    Current Biology , author =

    Robust branch patterning in moss shoots via symplasmic auxin diffusion , volume =. Current Biology , author =. 2025 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.09.031 , language =

  68. [68]

    Current Biology , author =

    Identification of a tetrahedral apical cell preserved within a fossilized fern fiddlehead , volume =. Current Biology , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.076 , abstract =

  69. [69]

    , month = dec, year =

    Shimada, Kenji and Gossard, David C. , month = dec, year =. Bubble mesh: automated triangular meshing of non-manifold geometry by sphere packing , isbn =. Proceedings of the third. doi:10.1145/218013.218095 , urldate =

  70. [70]

    Numerische Mathematik , author =

    A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , volume =. Numerische Mathematik , author =. 1959 , note =. doi:10.1007/BF01386390 , language =

  71. [71]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , author =

    Surface. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2020.3016645 , abstract =

  72. [72]

    The European Physical Journal E , author =

    Continuum modeling of non-conservative fluid membrane for simulating long-term cell dynamics , volume =. The European Physical Journal E , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1140/epje/s10189-022-00223-0 , abstract =

  73. [73]

    On growth and form , publisher =

    Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth , year =. On growth and form , publisher =

  74. [74]

    Annals of Botany , author =

    The comparative examination of the meristems of. Annals of Botany , author =. 1889 , pages =. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089998 , number =

  75. [75]

    Spatio-temporal orientation of microtubules controls conical cell shape in

    Ren, Huibo and Dang, Xie and Cai, Xianzhi and Yu, Peihang and Li, Yajun and Zhang, Shanshan and Liu, Menghong and Chen, Binqing and Lin, Deshu , month = jun, year =. Spatio-temporal orientation of microtubules controls conical cell shape in. PLOS Genetics , publisher =. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006851 , abstract =

  76. [76]

    International Journal of Developmental Biology , author =

    An anisotropic-viscoplastic model of plant cell morphogenesis by tip growth , volume =. International Journal of Developmental Biology , author =. 2003 , keywords =. doi:10.1387/ijdb.052066jd , abstract =

  77. [77]

    Quantitative Plant Biology , author =

    A viscoelastic–plastic deformation model of hemisphere-like tip growth in. Quantitative Plant Biology , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1017/qpb.2024.13 , abstract =

  78. [78]

    Allgemeine morphologie der

    Hofmeister, Wilhelm , year =. Allgemeine morphologie der

  79. [79]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Cytokinin–. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2116860119 , number =

  80. [80]

    Cammarata, Joseph and Strauss, Sören and Lane, Brendan and Kelly-Bellow, Robert and Mancini, Laure and Vernoux, Teva and Coudert, Yoan and Roeder, Adrienne H. K. and Smith, Richard S. , month = feb, year =. Spiral phyllotaxis in the moss. Current Biology , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.01.059 , language =

Showing first 80 references.