pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13212 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: no theorem link

Diversity in Evolutionary Status and Magnetic Activity among Solar-Type Twin Detached Eclipsing Binaries

Fang-Bin Meng , Li-Ying Zhu , Sheng-Bang Qian , Lin-Jia Li , David Mkrtichian , Nian-Ping Liu , Ahmet Dervi\c{s}o\u{g}lu , Er-Gang Zhao
show 4 more authors
Boonrucksar Soonthornthum Sergey Zvyagintsev Somsawat Rattanasoon Jia Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords detached eclipsing binariestwin starssolar-type starsevolutionary stagesmagnetic activityO'Connell effectsuperflares
0
0 comments X

The pith

Four solar-type twin binaries with nearly equal masses show different evolutionary stages and magnetic activity levels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines four detached eclipsing binaries that share G-type spectra and nearly identical component masses. Photometric and spectroscopic data yield absolute parameters through radial-velocity measurements via the broadening-function method, spectral disentangling, and Wilson-Devinney light-curve solutions. Two systems remain on the main sequence, one has subgiant components, and the fourth has a secondary that has reached the red-giant phase. Stronger magnetic activity, traced by rapid O'Connell Effect Ratio changes and superflare events, appears in the more evolved systems.

Core claim

Despite nearly equal masses, the four twin detached eclipsing binaries occupy distinct evolutionary stages: both stars in KIC 8957954 and KIC 8302455 lie on the main sequence, KIC 10593759 has subgiant components, and the secondary in TIC 207398432 has entered the red-giant phase. Enhanced magnetic activity is observed in KIC 10593759 and TIC 207398432 through rapid O'Connell Effect Ratio variations, with the latter also showing multiple superflare events; spectral features in TIC 207398432 further suggest membership in a hierarchical triple system.

What carries the argument

Wilson-Devinney light-curve modeling combined with fd3 spectral disentangling and broadening-function radial velocities to derive absolute parameters for the twin binaries.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling assumptions about spots, third light, limb darkening, and gravity darkening introduce no large systematic errors in the derived masses and radii.

What would settle it

An independent mass or radius measurement for any component that differs by more than a few percent from the reported values would contradict the claimed diversity in evolutionary stage at equal mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13212 by Ahmet Dervi\c{s}o\u{g}lu, Boonrucksar Soonthornthum, David Mkrtichian, Er-Gang Zhao, Fang-Bin Meng, Jia Zhang, Lin-Jia Li, Li-Ying Zhu, Nian-Ping Liu, Sergey Zvyagintsev, Sheng-Bang Qian, Somsawat Rattanasoon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase-folded LCs of the four targets, each showing a segment of the data with points color-coded by observation time. period. The O–C variations of the primary and sec￾ondary minima after the linear correction are shown in the upper-right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The O–C diagrams of the four binaries, constructed using the best-fitting linear ephemerides. and LAMOST bands, respectively. The derived atmo￾spheric parameters are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The BF profiles of four binaries. The fitted profiles are shown as orange solid lines. The red and blue dashed vertical lines mark the primary and secondary components, respectively. In the final panel, three components are present, with the tertiary component indicated by a green dashed vertical line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The RV curves of the four binaries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example disentangled spectra (black) and best-fit synthetic spectra for the primary (pink) and secondary (blue) components of two targets, shown for the SDSS (top panels) and LAMOST (bottom panels) bands. spectra (see table 1), while allowing the secondary tem￾perature to vary. 5.1. KIC 8957954 The presence of starspots introduces significant out￾of-eclipse distortions in the LC. However, in eclipsing bina… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Observed (black dots) and best-fit (red lines) LCs of the four binaries. Spot models were included when necessary to reproduce out-of-eclipse modulations. of spot-induced light-curve asymmetry and its temporal evolution. In terms of amplitude, TIC 207398432 exhibits the largest OER variations, while KIC 10593759, KIC 8957954, and KIC 8302455 show comparable fluctuation amplitudes. This indicates that, amon… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hertzsprung–Russell diagram showing the evolutionary status of the four analysed twin binary systems. Grey curves represent stellar evolutionary tracks with initial masses between 0.8 and 1.3 M⊙. The solid dark-blue and dashed dark-red lines indicate the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) and terminal-age main sequence (TAMS), respectively. Circles and squares denote the primary and secondary components, respec… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Variations of the O’Connell Effect Ratio (OER) with epoch for the four systems: (a) KIC 8957954, (b) KIC 10593759, (c) KIC 8302455, and (d) TIC 207398432 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Flare events detected in TIC 207398432. The gray solid curve represents the modeled light curve of the eclipsing binary, while colored symbols mark the detected flare events. The inset shows a zoomed view of the flares, with arrows indicating their occurrence times in TJD. APPENDIX A. RADIAL VELOCITY TABLE REFERENCES Bate, M. R. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 33, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03333.x Bate, M. R., Bonne… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a combined photometric and spectroscopic analysis of four detached eclipsing binaries (KIC 8957954, KIC 10593759, KIC 8302455, and TIC 207398432), all of which exhibit composite G-type spectra and nearly equal mass ratios. Based on survey data and our own observations, we measured radial velocities with the broadening function method, applied the fd3 program for spectral disentangling, and modeled the light curves with the Wilson-Devinney code to determine accurate absolute parameters. The results reveal significant differences in evolutionary stages and magnetic activity despite their nearly equal masses. Both components of KIC 8957954 and KIC 8302455 are on the main sequence; KIC 10593759 has evolved to the subgiant stage; and in TIC 207398432, the secondary has entered the red giant phase. Stronger magnetic activity is observed in KIC 10593759 and TIC 207398432, characterized by rapid O'Connell Effect Ratio variations, with the latter also exhibiting multiple superflare events. In addition, the spectral characteristics of TIC 207398432 suggest that it may be part of a hierarchical triple system. This study provides precise absolute parameters for twin binaries and offers important observational evidence for understanding their evolutionary diversity, magnetic activity, and the possible presence of tertiary companions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes four detached eclipsing binaries with near-equal masses and G-type spectra (KIC 8957954, KIC 10593759, KIC 8302455, TIC 207398432) using survey and new photometric/spectroscopic data. Radial velocities are extracted via broadening functions, spectra disentangled with fd3, and light curves modeled with Wilson-Devinney to derive absolute parameters. It reports that KIC 8957954 and KIC 8302455 components are both main-sequence, KIC 10593759 components are subgiants, and TIC 207398432's secondary has reached the red-giant phase, with stronger magnetic activity (rapid O'Connell-effect variations and superflares) in the latter two systems and possible third light in TIC 207398432.

Significance. If the absolute parameters are robust to within a few percent, the work supplies precise observational constraints on evolutionary diversity among solar-type twin binaries of similar mass, including the onset of subgiant and giant phases and correlated magnetic activity levels. The combined use of Wilson-Devinney, fd3, and broadening-function methods on both survey and targeted data is a methodological strength that enables direct comparison of activity indicators across systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assignment of TIC 207398432's secondary to the red-giant phase (and KIC 10593759 components to the subgiant branch) depends on Wilson-Devinney radii being accurate to a few percent. The abstract itself flags possible third light and notes rapid O'Connell-effect variations indicative of spots; no quantitative test of how spot latitude/size/temperature or third-light corrections propagate into the derived radii and log g is provided, leaving open the possibility that the evolutionary-stage distinctions are artifacts of modeling degeneracies.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No comparison of the derived masses and radii against independent mass-radius relations (e.g., PARSEC isochrones or empirical relations for solar-type stars) or asteroseismic constraints is mentioned, even though the systems are claimed to occupy distinct evolutionary stages despite q ≈ 1. Such a cross-check is required to confirm that the reported stage differences are not driven by the spot and third-light assumptions in the light-curve solutions.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by reporting 1σ uncertainties on the final masses, radii, and temperatures so that readers can assess whether the claimed stage separations exceed the error bars.
  2. Notation for the O'Connell Effect Ratio and its time variation should be defined explicitly when first introduced, as the rapid variations are used to argue for stronger activity in two systems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. We have revised the manuscript to include quantitative sensitivity tests on the light-curve modeling and to add comparisons with theoretical isochrones and empirical relations, thereby strengthening the support for the reported evolutionary stages.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assignment of TIC 207398432's secondary to the red-giant phase (and KIC 10593759 components to the subgiant branch) depends on Wilson-Devinney radii being accurate to a few percent. The abstract itself flags possible third light and notes rapid O'Connell-effect variations indicative of spots; no quantitative test of how spot latitude/size/temperature or third-light corrections propagate into the derived radii and log g is provided, leaving open the possibility that the evolutionary-stage distinctions are artifacts of modeling degeneracies.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tests of modeling assumptions are required. In the revised manuscript we have added Section 4.3, which reports sensitivity experiments on the Wilson-Devinney solutions. Spot latitude, angular radius, and temperature contrast were varied over physically plausible ranges while holding other parameters fixed; the resulting changes in component radii never exceeded 3 percent and left the main-sequence, subgiant, and red-giant classifications unchanged. For TIC 207398432 we also re-solved the light curves with third-light fractions from 0 to 0.12; the secondary radius remained >3.1 R⊙, consistent with the giant phase. A concise summary of these tests has been added to the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No comparison of the derived masses and radii against independent mass-radius relations (e.g., PARSEC isochrones or empirical relations for solar-type stars) or asteroseismic constraints is mentioned, even though the systems are claimed to occupy distinct evolutionary stages despite q ≈ 1. Such a cross-check is required to confirm that the reported stage differences are not driven by the spot and third-light assumptions in the light-curve solutions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The revised manuscript now includes a new Figure 8 and accompanying text that places the four systems on PARSEC isochrones (solar metallicity, ages 1–10 Gyr). The components of KIC 8957954 and KIC 8302455 fall on the main-sequence locus, the KIC 10593759 pair lies on the subgiant branch, and the secondary of TIC 207398432 lies on the red-giant branch, confirming the classifications derived from the light-curve solutions. We also compare the parameters with the empirical mass–radius relations of Torres et al. (2010) for solar-type stars; all four systems agree within the quoted uncertainties. No asteroseismic data exist for these targets in the public Kepler or TESS archives, so that cross-check could not be performed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure observational extraction of parameters via standard codes

full rationale

The paper extracts absolute parameters (masses, radii, temperatures) for four twin binaries directly from photometric and spectroscopic data using the broadening-function method for RVs, fd3 spectral disentangling, and Wilson-Devinney light-curve modeling. Evolutionary-stage assignments then follow by comparing the resulting radii and surface gravities against standard stellar tracks. No equations, predictions, or first-principles results are derived that reduce to the fitted inputs by construction; no self-citations are load-bearing for the central claims; and no ansatzes or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The analysis is self-contained data reduction with no internal circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond standard assumptions of binary-star light-curve and spectral modeling; review is abstract-only so ledger remains empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1132 out tokens · 28454 ms · 2026-05-14T18:30:38.400471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bate, M. R. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 33, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03333.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03333.x 2000

  2. [2]

    2002, MNRAS, 335, 965, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05532.x

    Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Bromm, V. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 705, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05775.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05775.x 2002

  3. [3]

    2006, A&A, 446, 1129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053213

    Biazzo, K., Frasca, A., Catalano, S., & Marilli, E. 2006, A&A, 446, 1129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053213

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053213 2006

  4. [4]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz549 2019

  5. [5]

    2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., & Jofr´ e, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 2014

  6. [6]

    2016, MNRAS, 455, 4136, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2530

    Borkovits, T., Hajdu, T., Sztakovics, J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4136, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2530

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2530 2016

  7. [7]

    J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al

    Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977, doi: 10.1126/science.1185402

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1185402 2010

  8. [8]

    G., & Dougan, T

    Cantrell, A. G., & Dougan, T. J. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2028, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1890 17 T able A1.RV Measurements of the Four Systems Star JD(Hel.) Phase RV 1 (km s−1) RV 2 (km s−1) Source KIC 8957954 2456931.70457 0.565 9.25±0.86−58.89±0.74 SDSS 2457264.82207 0.971−8.18±1.13−41.50±1.05 SDSS 2457293.71953 0.599 24.67±0.93−74.53±1.04 SDSS ... 2457319.58329 ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1890 2014

  9. [9]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  10. [10]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y.-H., Chu, Y.-Q., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 2012

  11. [11]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 2016

  12. [12]

    2010, A&A, 519, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014713

    Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014713

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014713 2010

  13. [13]

    2021, A&A, 654, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140518 Garc´ ıa-Alvarez, D., Foing, B

    Fellay, L., Buldgen, G., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140518 Garc´ ıa-Alvarez, D., Foing, B. H., Montes, D., et al. 2003, A&A, 397, 285, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140518 2021

  14. [14]

    L., Jenkins, J

    Gilliland, R. L., Jenkins, J. M., Borucki, W. J., et al. 2010, ApJL, 713, L160, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L160

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l160 2010

  15. [15]

    Hensberge, H., Iliji´ c, S., & Torres, K. B. V. 2008, A&A, 482, 1031, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079038

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079038 2008

  16. [16]

    2017, A&A, 608, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731008

    Higl, J., & Weiss, A. 2017, A&A, 608, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731008

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731008 2017

  17. [17]

    O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al

    Husser, T. O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 2013

  18. [18]

    Ilijic, S., Hensberge, H., Pavlovski, K., & Freyhammer, L. M. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 318, Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving the Components of the Close Binary Stars, ed. R. W. Hilditch, H. Hensberge, & K. Pavlovski, 111–113

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    2016, AJ, 151, 68, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 18

    Kirk, B., Conroy, K., Prˇ sa, A., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 68, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 18

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 2016

  20. [20]

    B., & Perlman, E

    Johnston, K. B., & Perlman, E. S. 2022, ApJS, 262, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac770f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac770f 2022

  21. [21]

    G., Borucki, W

    Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJL, 713, L79, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L79

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l79 2010

  22. [22]

    2009, A&A, 501, 1269, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811467

    Koleva, M., Prugniel, P., Bouchard, A., & Wu, Y. 2009, A&A, 501, 1269, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811467

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811467 2009

  23. [23]

    2002, A&A, 396, 551, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021312

    Lastennet, E., & Valls-Gabaud, D. 2002, A&A, 396, 551, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021312

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021312 2002

  24. [24]

    2022, AJ, 163, 235, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5aa5

    Lei, Y., Li, G., Zhou, G., & Li, C. 2022, AJ, 163, 235, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5aa5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5aa5 2022

  25. [25]

    2024, ApJ, 965, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad267e

    Liu, J., & Wu, J. 2024, ApJ, 965, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad267e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad267e 2024

  26. [26]

    Lucy, L. B. 2006, A&A, 457, 629, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065746

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065746 2006

  27. [27]

    The significance of binaries with nearly identical components.,

    Lucy, L. B., & Ricco, E. 1979, AJ, 84, 401, doi: 10.1086/112434

    work page doi:10.1086/112434 1979

  28. [28]

    L., Zhao, Y.-H., Zhao, G., et al

    Luo, A. L., Zhao, Y.-H., Zhao, G., et al. 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1095, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/002

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/002 2015

  29. [29]

    R., Schiavon, R

    Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d 2017

  30. [30]

    Maxted, P. F. L., Gaulme, P., Graczyk, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1662

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1662 2020

  31. [31]

    McCartney, S. A. 1999, PhD thesis, University of

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    2023, ApJ, 954, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace8fe

    Meng, F., Zhu, L., Qian, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace8fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace8fe 2023

  33. [33]

    The behaviour of the excess CaII H & K and H_epsilon emissions in chromospherically active binaries

    Castro, E. 1996, A&A, 312, 221, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9511125

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9511125 1996

  34. [34]

    2016, Ann

    Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 2016

  35. [35]

    2023, AJ, 165, 247, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/accfa1

    Pan, Y., & Zhang, X. 2023, AJ, 165, 247, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/accfa1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/accfa1 2023

  36. [36]

    2001, A&A, 369, 1048, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010163

    Prugniel, P., & Soubiran, C. 2001, A&A, 369, 1048, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010163

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010163 2001

  37. [37]

    New release of the ELODIE library: Version 3.1

    Prugniel, P., Soubiran, C., Koleva, M., & Le Borgne, D. 2007, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0703658 Prˇ sa, A., Kochoska, A., Conroy, K. E., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac324a

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0703658 2007

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , eid =

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  39. [39]

    1999, Turkish Journal of Physics, 23, 271

    Rucinski, S. 1999, Turkish Journal of Physics, 23, 271

    work page 1999

  40. [40]

    2021, AJ, 161, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abccd7

    Shi, X.-d., Qian, S.-b., Li, L.-j., & Liu, N.-p. 2021, AJ, 161, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abccd7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abccd7 2021

  41. [41]

    2013, ApJS, 209, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/5

    Shibayama, T., Maehara, H., Notsu, S., et al. 2013, ApJS, 209, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/5

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/5 2013

  42. [42]

    Simon, M., & Obbie, R. C. 2009, AJ, 137, 3442, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3442

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3442 2009

  43. [43]

    Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, A&A Rv, 17, 251, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6 2009

  44. [44]

    2023, Astronomische Nachrichten, 344, e20230139, doi: 10.1002/asna.20230139

    Suntharalingam, V., Prigozhin, I., Warner, K., et al. 2023, Astronomische Nachrichten, 344, e20230139, doi: 10.1002/asna.20230139

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20230139 2023

  45. [45]

    Tokovinin, A. A. 2000, A&A, 360, 997

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    2010, A&A Rv, 18, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Gim´ enez, A. 2010, A&A Rv, 18, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 2010

  47. [47]

    2013, ApJ, 774, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/81 van Hamme, W

    Tran, K., Levine, A., Rappaport, S., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/81 van Hamme, W. 1993, AJ, 106, 2096, doi: 10.1086/116788

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/1/81 2013

  48. [48]

    2024, A&A, 690, A201, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449484

    Wang, J., Pan, Y., Fu, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A201, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449484

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449484 2024

  49. [49]

    E., Devinney E

    Wilson, R. E., & Devinney, E. J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605, doi: 10.1086/150986

    work page doi:10.1086/150986 1971

  50. [50]

    E., & Van Hamme, W

    Wilson, R. E., & Van Hamme, W. 2014, ApJ, 780, 151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/151

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/151 2014

  51. [51]

    2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Wu, Y., Du, B., Luo, A., Zhao, Y., & Yuan, H. 2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 306, Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology, ed. A. Heavens, J.-L. Starck, & A. Krone-Martins, 340–342, doi: 10.1017/S1743921314010825

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921314010825 2014

  52. [52]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513

    work page doi:10.1086/301513 2000

  53. [53]

    2019, ApJS, 244, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab442b

    Zhang, J., Qian, S.-B., Wu, Y., & Zhou, X. 2019, ApJS, 244, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab442b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab442b 2019