pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13578 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🧮 math.QA · math.RT

Recognition: unknown

Quiver varieties and dual canonical bases

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.QA math.RT MSC 17B3716G20
keywords dual canonical basesquantum groupsquiver varietiesHall algebrasBerenstein-Greenstein basesıquantum groupspositivitybraid group actions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dual canonical bases of quantum groups coincide with Berenstein-Greenstein double canonical bases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys how ıquiver algebras realize quasi-split ıquantum groups of type ADE in two ways: through ıHall algebras and through quantum Grothendieck rings of Nakajima-Keller-Scherotzke quiver varieties. These realizations produce dual canonical bases that carry positivity. Treating ordinary quantum groups as the diagonal case of ıquantum groups, the authors show that the resulting dual canonical bases are identical to the double canonical bases introduced by Berenstein and Greenstein, thereby settling several of their conjectures on braid invariance and transition coefficients.

Core claim

The dual canonical bases of quantum groups coincide with the double canonical bases defined by Berenstein and Greenstein; the identification follows from the geometric construction via quiver varieties and from the new ıHall-algebra construction that is invariant under braid-group actions and yields positive transition-matrix coefficients from the Hall basis.

What carries the argument

ıquiver algebras, which furnish both the ıHall-algebra and quantum-Grothendieck-ring realizations of quasi-split ıquantum groups and thereby transport the dual canonical bases with positivity.

If this is right

  • The transition matrix from the Hall basis to the dual canonical basis has all nonnegative coefficients.
  • The dual canonical basis remains invariant under the natural braid-group actions.
  • Positivity properties established geometrically for ıquantum groups descend to ordinary quantum groups.
  • Several conjectures of Berenstein and Greenstein on the structure of double canonical bases are settled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quiver-variety methods may supply explicit positivity proofs for canonical bases in other quantum-group settings beyond ADE.
  • The identification opens a route to compute structure constants of double canonical bases via counting points on quiver varieties.
  • Braid invariance of the basis may translate into new symmetries for the representation categories attached to the same quivers.

Load-bearing premise

That the ıquiver algebras correctly supply the two stated realizations of quasi-split ıquantum groups.

What would settle it

An explicit low-rank example (say type A2 or D4) in which the basis vectors produced by the quiver-variety construction differ from the Berenstein-Greenstein double canonical basis vectors.

read the original abstract

We survey some recent developments on the theory of dual canonical bases for quantum groups and $\imath$quantum groups. The $\imath$quiver algebras were introduced by Wang and the first author, which are used to give two realizations of quasi-split $\imath$quantum groups of type ADE: one via the $\imath$Hall algebras and the other via the quantum Grothendieck rings of Nakajima-Keller-Scherotzke quiver varieties. The geometric construction of the $\imath$quantum groups produces their dual canonical bases with positivity, generalizing Qin's geometric realization of quantum groups of type ADE. Recently, the authors provided a new construction of the dual canonical basis in the setting of $\imath$Hall algebras, and proved that it is invariant under braid group actions, and obtained the positivity of the transition matrix coefficients from the Hall basis to the dual canonical basis. As quantum groups can be regarded as $\imath$quantum groups of diagonal type, we demonstrate that the dual canonical bases of quantum groups coincide with the double canonical bases defined by Berenstein and Greenstein, and resolve several conjectures therein.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper surveys recent developments on dual canonical bases for quantum groups and ı-quantum groups. The ı-quiver algebras are used to realize quasi-split ı-quantum groups of type ADE in two ways: via ı-Hall algebras and via quantum Grothendieck rings of Nakajima-Keller-Scherotzke quiver varieties. A new construction of the dual canonical basis is given in the ı-Hall algebra setting, with proofs of braid-group invariance and positivity of transition coefficients from the Hall basis. Viewing ordinary quantum groups as ı-quantum groups of diagonal type, the authors show that the dual canonical bases coincide with the Berenstein-Greenstein double canonical bases and resolve several conjectures.

Significance. If the identifications are verified, the work unifies geometric (generalizing Qin's realization) and algebraic constructions of canonical bases for quantum groups and their ı-analogues, establishes invariance and positivity properties, and confirms conjectures on double canonical bases. This would be a notable contribution to the theory of canonical bases in quantum groups.

major comments (1)
  1. [Demonstration that dual canonical bases coincide with Berenstein-Greenstein double canonical bases] The central coincidence claim for ordinary quantum groups (viewed as diagonal-type ı-quantum groups) depends on the ı-quiver algebra supplying matching realizations in both the ı-Hall algebra and the quantum Grothendieck ring settings. The manuscript cites prior work for the isomorphisms but does not re-derive or explicitly cross-check that the new dual canonical basis (constructed via braid-group invariance and positivity) agrees with the geometric basis on the diagonal subalgebra. This identification is load-bearing for the claimed resolution of the Berenstein-Greenstein conjectures.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to resolving 'several conjectures' without naming them; an explicit list in the introduction or conclusion would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the insightful comments. We provide a point-by-point response to the major comment and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central coincidence claim for ordinary quantum groups (viewed as diagonal-type ı-quantum groups) depends on the ı-quiver algebra supplying matching realizations in both the ı-Hall algebra and the quantum Grothendieck ring settings. The manuscript cites prior work for the isomorphisms but does not re-derive or explicitly cross-check that the new dual canonical basis (constructed via braid-group invariance and positivity) agrees with the geometric basis on the diagonal subalgebra. This identification is load-bearing for the claimed resolution of the Berenstein-Greenstein conjectures.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important aspect. The manuscript demonstrates the coincidence by specializing to the diagonal type, where the ı-quiver algebra reduces to the ordinary quiver algebra. The ı-Hall algebra construction then corresponds to the standard Hall algebra realization of quantum groups, and the quantum Grothendieck ring realization aligns with the geometric construction via the isomorphisms established in the cited prior works on ı-Hall algebras and Nakajima-Keller-Scherotzke quiver varieties. The new dual canonical basis—defined in the ı-Hall setting by braid-group invariance and positivity of transition coefficients from the Hall basis—agrees with the Berenstein-Greenstein double canonical basis because both are uniquely characterized by these properties under the isomorphism. To address the concern directly and make the argument more self-contained, we will add an explicit cross-check subsection that verifies the agreement on the diagonal subalgebra by comparing basis elements and transition matrices through the isomorphism, rather than relying solely on citations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Coincidence claim for ordinary quantum groups reduces to unverified self-cited isomorphism of ı-quiver algebra realizations on diagonal type

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "The ıquiver algebras were introduced by Wang and the first author, which are used to give two realizations of quasi-split ıquantum groups of type ADE: one via the ıHall algebras and the other via the quantum Grothendieck rings of Nakajima-Keller-Scherotzke quiver varieties. ... As quantum groups can be regarded as ıquantum groups of diagonal type, we demonstrate that the dual canonical bases of quantum groups coincide with the double canonical bases defined by Berenstein and Greenstein, and resolve several conjectures therein."

    The demonstration of coincidence relies on the equivalence of the two realizations (Hall algebra vs. geometric) being the same map that identifies the new dual canonical basis (constructed via braid invariance and positivity in the Hall setting) with the geometric dual canonical basis. This equivalence is supplied only by the self-cited prior work; no independent check or explicit isomorphism of bases on the diagonal subalgebra is provided here, so the result reduces to the prior identification by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central demonstration—that dual canonical bases of quantum groups coincide with Berenstein–Greenstein double canonical bases—proceeds by specializing to ı-quantum groups of diagonal type and invoking the two realizations (ı-Hall algebra and quantum Grothendieck ring) supplied by the ı-quiver algebras. These realizations and their equivalence are taken directly from the prior Wang–Lu construction without re-derivation or explicit verification that the newly constructed Hall-algebra basis maps to the geometric basis under the identification. This makes the coincidence result load-bearing on the self-citation rather than independently established within the present manuscript.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the prior definition of i-quiver algebras and standard properties of quantum groups, Hall algebras, and quiver varieties; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption i-quiver algebras realize quasi-split i-quantum groups via i-Hall algebras and quantum Grothendieck rings
    Invoked as the foundation for the two realizations described in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard properties of quantum groups of type ADE and their geometric realizations
    Used to generalize Qin's construction to the i-setting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1354 out tokens · 40347 ms · 2026-05-14T18:03:11.191038+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Achar, Perverse sheaves and applications to representation theory, vol

    P. Achar, Perverse sheaves and applications to representation theory, vol. 258, American Mathematical Society, 2021

  2. [2]

    Auslander and R

    M. Auslander and R. Buchweitz,

  3. [3]

    H. Bao, J. Kujawa, Y. Li and W. Wang,

  4. [4]

    H. Bao, P. Shan, W. Wang and B. Webster,

  5. [5]

    Bao and W

    H. Bao and W. Wang, A new approach to Kazhdan-Lusztig theory of type B via quantum symmetric pairs , Ast\'erisque 402, 2018, vii+134pp

  6. [6]

    Bao and W

    H. Bao and W. Wang, Canonical bases arising from quantum symmetric pairs , Invent. Math. 213 (2018), 1099--1177

  7. [7]

    Beilinson, J

    A.A. Beilinson, J. Bernstein, P. Deligne, Faisceaux pervers, Ast\' e risque 100, 1982

  8. [8]

    Berenstein and J

    A. Berenstein and J. Greenstein, Double canonical bases , Adv. Math. 316 (2017), 381--468

  9. [9]

    Berenstein and A

    A. Berenstein and A. Zelevinsky, Triangular Bases in Quantum Cluster Algebras , IMRN 2014 (2014), no. 6, 1651--1688

  10. [10]

    Braden, Hyperbolic localization of intersection cohomology , Transform

    T. Braden, Hyperbolic localization of intersection cohomology , Transform. Groups 8 (2003), no. 3, 209--216

  11. [11]

    Bridgeland, Quantum groups via Hall algebras of complexes , Ann

    T. Bridgeland, Quantum groups via Hall algebras of complexes , Ann. Math. 177 (2013), 739--759

  12. [12]

    J. Chen, M. Lu, X. Pan, S. Ruan and W. Wang, i Quantum groups and i Hopf algebras II: dual canonical bases , arXiv:2601.00524 https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00524

  13. [13]

    Chen and X

    X. Chen and X. Zhou, Bases of the quantum group and quantum group of sl _2 , J. Algebra 690 (2025), 425--474

  14. [14]

    Cibils, E

    C. Cibils, E. Marcos, Skew category, Galois covering and smash product of a k -category , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134

  15. [15]

    B. Deng, J. Du, B. Parshall and J. Wang, Finite dimensional algebras and quantum groups, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 150. AMS, Providence, RI, 2008

  16. [16]

    M. A. A. de Cataldo and L. Migliorini, The Hard Lefschetz Theorem and the topology of semismall maps , Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 35 (2002), no. 5, 759–772

  17. [17]

    Enochs and O.M.G

    E.E. Enochs and O.M.G. Jenda,

  18. [18]

    J. Fang, Y. Lan and J. Xiao, Sheaf realization of Bridgeland's Hall algebra of Dynkin type

  19. [19]

    Freitag and R

    E. Freitag and R. Kiehl, Etale Cohomology and the Weil Conjecture, Springer, 1988

  20. [20]

    Gabriel, Auslander-Reiten sequences and representation-finite algebras , Representation theory, I (Proc

    P. Gabriel, Auslander-Reiten sequences and representation-finite algebras , Representation theory, I (Proc

  21. [21]

    Gabriel, The universal cover of a representation finite algebra , in: Representation of Algebras, in: Lecture Notes in Math., vol

    P. Gabriel, The universal cover of a representation finite algebra , in: Representation of Algebras, in: Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 903 (1981), 65--105

  22. [22]

    Geiss, B

    C. Geiss, B. Leclerc, and J. Schr\" o er, Generic bases for cluster algebras and the Chamber Ansatz , J

  23. [23]

    Geiss, B

    C. Geiss, B. Leclerc, and J. Schr\" o er, Cluster structures on quantum coordinate rings , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 19 (2013), 337--397

  24. [24]

    Goodearl and M.T

    K.R. Goodearl and M.T. Yakimov, Integral quantum cluster structures , Duke Math. J. 170 (2021), no. 6, 1137--1200

  25. [25]

    Gorsky, Semi-derived and derived Hall algebras for stable categories , IMRN, Vol

    M. Gorsky, Semi-derived and derived Hall algebras for stable categories , IMRN, Vol. 2018, 138--159

  26. [26]

    Green, Hall algebras, hereditary algebras and quantum groups , Invent

    J.A. Green, Hall algebras, hereditary algebras and quantum groups , Invent. Math. 120 (1995), 361--377

  27. [27]

    Happel, On the deived category of a finite-dimesional algebra , Comment

    D. Happel, On the deived category of a finite-dimesional algebra , Comment. Math. Helv. 62 (3)(1987), 339--389

  28. [28]

    Happel, Triangulated Categories in the Representation Theory of Finite Dimensional Algebras

    D. Happel, Triangulated Categories in the Representation Theory of Finite Dimensional Algebras. London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Ser. 119, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988

  29. [29]

    Happel, On Gorenstein algebras , In: Progress in Math

    D. Happel, On Gorenstein algebras , In: Progress in Math. 95, Birkh\" a user Verlag, Basel, 1991, 389--404

  30. [30]

    Hernandez and B

    D. Hernandez and B. Leclerc, Quantum Grothendieck rings and derived Hall algebras , J. Reine Angew. Math. 701 (2015), 77--126

  31. [31]

    Iyama, -categories

    O. Iyama, -categories. I: Ladders, Algebr. Represent. Theory 8 (2205), no.3, 297--321

  32. [32]

    S.-J. Kang, M. Kashiwara, M. Kim, and S.-j. Oh, Monoidal categorification of cluster algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), 349--426

  33. [33]

    Kapranov, Heisenberg doubles and derived categories , J

    M. Kapranov, Heisenberg doubles and derived categories , J. Algebra 202 (1997), 712--744

  34. [34]

    Kashiwara, M

    M. Kashiwara, M. Kim, S. Oh, and E. Park, Braid group action on the module

  35. [35]

    Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the Q -analogue of universal enveloping algebras , Duke Math

    M. Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the Q -analogue of universal enveloping algebras , Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), 456--516

  36. [36]

    Kato, Poincar\' e -Birkhoff-Witt bases and Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras , Duke Math

    S. Kato, Poincar\' e -Birkhoff-Witt bases and Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras , Duke Math. J. 163 (2014), 619--663

  37. [37]

    Keller, Chain complexes and stable categories , Manus

    B. Keller, Chain complexes and stable categories , Manus. Math. 67 (1990), 379--417

  38. [38]

    Keller, On triangulated orbit categories , Doc

    B. Keller, On triangulated orbit categories , Doc. Math. 10 (2005), 551--581

  39. [39]

    Keller and S

    B. Keller and S. Scherotzke, Graded quiver varieties and derived categories , J. Reine Angew. Math. 713 (2016), 85--127

  40. [40]

    S.-J. Kang, M. Kashiwara, M. Kim,

  41. [41]

    Kiehl and R

    R. Kiehl and R. Weissauer, Weil conjectures, perverse sheaves and l'adic Fourier transform, Ergebnisse

  42. [42]

    Kolb, Quantum symmetric Kac-Moody pairs , Adv

    S. Kolb, Quantum symmetric Kac-Moody pairs , Adv. Math. 267 (2014), 395--469

  43. [43]

    Kolb and J

    S. Kolb and J. Pellegrini, Braid group actions on coideal subalgebras of quantized enveloping algebras , J. Algebra 336 (2011), 395--416

  44. [44]

    Kolb and M

    S. Kolb and M. Yakimov, Symmetric pairs for Nichols algebras of diagonal type via star products , Adv. Math. 365 (2020), 107042

  45. [45]

    Kolb and M

    S. Kolb and M. Yakimov, Defining relations of quantum symmetric pair coideal subalgebras , Forum of Mathematics, Sigma (2021), Vol. 9:e67, 1--38

  46. [46]

    Laumon, Transformation de Fourier, constantes d’\'equations fonctionnelles et conjecture de Weil , Inst

    G. Laumon, Transformation de Fourier, constantes d’\'equations fonctionnelles et conjecture de Weil , Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 65 (1987), 131--210

  47. [47]

    Leclerc and P.-G

    B. Leclerc and P.-G. Plamondon, Nakajima varieties and repetitive algebras , Publ. RIMS 49 (2013), 531--561

  48. [48]

    Le Bruyn and C

    L. Le Bruyn and C. Procesi, Semisimple representations of quivers , Trans

  49. [49]

    Letzter, Symmetric pairs for quantized enveloping algebras , J

    G. Letzter, Symmetric pairs for quantized enveloping algebras , J. Algebra 220 (1999), 729--767

  50. [50]

    Lin and L

    J. Lin and L. Peng, Semi-derived Ringel-Hall algebras and Hall algebras of odd-periodic relative derived categories , Sci. China Math. 67 (2024), no.8, 1735--1760

  51. [51]

    Lu and X

    M. Lu and X. Pan, Dual canonical bases for quantum groups and quantum groups I: Hall algebras , https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19073 arXiv:2504.19073v2

  52. [52]

    Lu and X

    M. Lu and X. Pan, Dual canonical bases of quantum groups and iquantum groups II: geometry , arXiv:2603.01350 https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01350

  53. [53]

    Lu and X

    M. Lu and X. Pan, Dual and double canonical bases of quantum groups , arXiv:2603.03381 https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03381

  54. [54]

    Lu and L

    M. Lu and L. Peng, Semi-derived Ringel-Hall algebras and Drinfeld double , Adv. Math. 383 (2021), 107668

  55. [55]

    Lu and S

    M. Lu and S. Ruan, Hall algebras of weighted projective lines and quantum symmetric pairs III: quasi-split type , arXiv:2411.13078 https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13078

  56. [56]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum symmetric pairs II: reflection functors , Commun. Math. Phys. 381 (2021), 799--855

  57. [57]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum symmetric pairs III: Quiver varieties , Adv. Math. 393 (2021), 108071

  58. [58]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum symmetric pairs I: Foundations , Proc. London Math. Soc. 124 (1): 1--82

  59. [59]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Braid group symmetries on quasi-split quantum groups via Hall algebras , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 28 (2022), Paper No. 84, 64 pp

  60. [60]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum symmetric pairs of Kac-Moody type , Adv. Math. 430 (2023), 109215

  61. [61]

    Lu and W

    M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum groups , Categorical, combinatorial and geometric representation theory and related topics, 371--433, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 108 , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2024

  62. [62]

    Lusztig, Canonical bases arising from quantized enveloping algebras , J

    G. Lusztig, Canonical bases arising from quantized enveloping algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), 447--498

  63. [63]

    Lusztig, Quivers, perverse sheaves, and quantized enveloping algebras , J

    G. Lusztig, Quivers, perverse sheaves, and quantized enveloping algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (2)(1991), 365--421, 1991

  64. [64]

    Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups, Birkh\" a user, Boston, 1993

    G. Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups, Birkh\" a user, Boston, 1993

  65. [65]

    Lusztig, Canonical bases and Hall algebras , in: Representation Theories and Algebraic Geometry, Springer, 1998, 365--399

    G. Lusztig, Canonical bases and Hall algebras , in: Representation Theories and Algebraic Geometry, Springer, 1998, 365--399

  66. [66]

    Nakajima, Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras , J

    H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), 145--238 (electronic)

  67. [67]

    Nakajima, Quiver varieties and t -analogs of q -characters of quantum affine algebras , Ann

    H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and t -analogs of q -characters of quantum affine algebras , Ann. Math. 160 (2004), 1057--1097

  68. [68]

    N a st a sescu and F

    C. N a st a sescu and F. Van Oystaeyen, Methods of Graded Rings, Lecture Notes in

  69. [69]

    Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models , Proc

    D. Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models , Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 246 (3) (2004), 227--248

  70. [70]

    Peng and J

    L. Peng and J. Xiao, Root categories and simple Lie algebras , J. Algebra, 198 (1)(1997), 19--56

  71. [71]

    Qin, Quantum groups via cyclic quiver varieties I , Compos

    F. Qin, Quantum groups via cyclic quiver varieties I , Compos. Math. 152 (2016), 299--326

  72. [72]

    Qin, Dual canonical bases and quantum cluster algebras , arxiv:2003.13674 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13674v3

    F. Qin, Dual canonical bases and quantum cluster algebras , arxiv:2003.13674 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13674v3

  73. [73]

    Quillen, Higher algebraic K-theory, I , Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 341 (1973), 85--147

    D. Quillen, Higher algebraic K-theory, I , Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 341 (1973), 85--147

  74. [74]

    Riedtmann, Degenerations for representations of quivers with relations , Ann

    C. Riedtmann, Degenerations for representations of quivers with relations , Ann. scient. \' E c. Norm. Sup. 19 (1986), 275--301

  75. [75]

    Ringel, Hall algebras and quantum groups , Invent

    C. Ringel, Hall algebras and quantum groups , Invent. Math. 101 (1990), 583--591

  76. [76]

    Scherotzke, Desingularization of Quiver Grassmannians via Nakajima Categories , Algebr

    S. Scherotzke, Desingularization of Quiver Grassmannians via Nakajima Categories , Algebr. Represent. Theor. 20 (2017), 231--243

  77. [77]

    Scherotzke, Generalized quiver varieties and triangulated categories , Math

    S. Scherotzke, Generalized quiver varieties and triangulated categories , Math. Z. 292 (2019), 1453--1478

  78. [78]

    Scherotzke and N

    S. Scherotzke and N. Sibilla, Quiver varieties and Hall algebras , Proc. London Math. Soc. 112 (2016), 1002--1018

  79. [79]

    Schiffmann, Lectures on Hall algebras , in: Geometric Methods in Representation Theory II, in: S\' e min

    O. Schiffmann, Lectures on Hall algebras , in: Geometric Methods in Representation Theory II, in: S\' e min. Congr., vol. 24-II, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 2012, pp. 1--141

  80. [80]

    Sevenhant, M

    B. Sevenhant, M. Van den Bergh, On the double of the Hall algebra of a quiver , J. Algebra 221 (1999), 135--160

Showing first 80 references.