pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14017 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: no theorem link

Constraining the Galactic Center Dark Cluster with ELT/MICADO Observations

Sebastiano D. von Fellenberg , Mat\'u\v{s} Labaj , Sean M. Ressler
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords Galactic Centerdark clusterstellar compact objectsELTMICADOSgr A*astrometryphotometric variability
0
0 comments X

The pith

ELT/MICADO observations can deliver the first quantitative constraints on the dark cluster of stellar compact objects around Sgr A*.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how the Extremely Large Telescope with its MICADO imager can search the Galactic Center for evidence of a predicted population of unseen stellar remnants. These black holes, neutron stars, and white dwarfs should form a dense dark cluster whose distribution affects cluster dynamics and the rate of extreme mass ratio inspirals. Existing data give only indirect clues from mass measurements and occasional X-ray transients, but crowding and extinction have blocked direct detection so far. MICADO's deep photometry, high spatial resolution, and precise astrometry open two main routes: spotting variability and orbital motion in binaries containing a compact object, and identifying isolated accreting black holes interacting with local gas. Success would convert theoretical expectations into actual numbers for the first time.

Core claim

ELT/MICADO observations can provide the first quantitative constraints on the dark cluster population by enabling systematic searches for stellar compact object binaries through photometric variability and astrometric orbital signatures, together with direct detection of isolated accreting black holes in the gas-rich Galactic Center environment.

What carries the argument

MICADO's combination of deep photometry, high spatial resolution, and precise astrometry to identify variability and orbital motions of compact-object binaries amid crowding and extinction.

If this is right

  • The number, mass distribution, and radial profile of stellar black holes, neutron stars, and white dwarfs near Sgr A* become directly measurable for the first time.
  • Models of mass segregation and dynamical relaxation in nuclear star clusters can be tested against data rather than assumed.
  • Rates of extreme mass ratio inspirals for LISA and similar gravitational-wave detectors can be placed on an observational footing.
  • The role of compact remnants in the overall energy and angular-momentum budget of the Galactic Center becomes quantifiable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar imaging programs on other nearby galactic nuclei could test whether dark clusters are a generic outcome of dense stellar environments.
  • A non-detection would force revisions in models of compact-object retention and ejection in galactic centers.
  • The same data set could simultaneously constrain the binary fraction among ordinary stars and the gas accretion properties of isolated black holes.

Load-bearing premise

MICADO will achieve its planned sensitivity and astrometric precision in the actual crowded and extincted Galactic Center field, and the predicted observable signatures from SCO-star binaries and accreting black holes will appear at the expected levels.

What would settle it

A sufficiently deep MICADO campaign that finds neither photometric or astrometric binary signatures nor isolated accreting black holes at the levels needed to match current theoretical predictions would indicate that the dark cluster population is substantially smaller or differently distributed than expected.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14017 by Mat\'u\v{s} Labaj, Sean M. Ressler, Sebastiano D. von Fellenberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Model Hertzsprung—Russell diagram of the Galac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mock observations of the variability of the host K7V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Maximum size of orbital ellipses for simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mock astrometric observation of the Gaia-detected star-stellar mass black hole binary system (El-Badry et al. 2023b) if it [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Paschen-α image of the central ∼ 15 arcseconds2 of the galaxy, showing the large-scale mini-spiral gas streamers. The image was published in Dinh et al. (2024). with MBH = 10 M⊙ accreting at a comparable fraction of Edding￾ton would plausibly have a luminosity of LSCO ∼ 1030 erg s−1 , which is roughly an order of magnitude larger than the ELT de￾tection limit in the Galactic Center [O(1029 erg/s)]. However… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left panel: Accretion rate in Eddington units for a 10 M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top left panel: Spatial distribution of SBHs in our model, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Galactic Center hosts the densest known stellar environment in the Milky Way, dominated by the massive black hole Sgr A* and the surrounding nuclear star cluster. Theory predicts that this region should also contain a large population of stellar compact objects (SCOs) - black holes, neutron stars, and white dwarfs - forming a "dark cluster" whose distribution and properties remain observationally unconstrained. These unseen stellar remnants are central to questions of mass segregation, cluster dynamics, and the expected rate of extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs) detectable by future gravitational-wave observatories including LISA. Current evidence for SCOs in the Galactic Center is indirect, relying on dynamical mass measurements, X-ray surveys, and a small number of transient sources. Direct detections remain elusive due to crowding, extinction, and the sensitivity limits of existing instruments. We explore how upcoming facilities, in particular the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) with its first-light imager MICADO, can fundamentally transform this field. MICADO's combination of deep photometry, high spatial resolution, and precise astrometry will enable systematic searches for SCO-star binaries via photometric variability and orbital astrometric signatures, as well as direct detection of isolated accreting black holes interacting with the gas-rich Galactic Center environment. We outline the observational pathways, technical challenges, and expected sensitivities, showing that ELT/MICADO observations can provide the first quantitative constraints on the dark cluster population. Establishing these constraints will be pivotal for understanding the dynamical evolution of the Galactic Center, the role of compact remnants in nuclear star clusters, and the astrophysical context of gravitational-wave sources in galactic nuclei.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that ELT/MICADO observations can deliver the first quantitative constraints on the Galactic Center dark cluster of stellar compact objects (SCOs) by enabling systematic searches for SCO-star binaries through photometric variability and orbital astrometric wobbles, together with direct detection of isolated accreting black holes in the gas-rich environment. It outlines observational pathways, technical challenges, and expected sensitivities based on the instrument's high spatial resolution, deep photometry, and precise astrometry.

Significance. If the projected sensitivities are realized, the work would be significant for resolving the distribution and properties of unseen compact remnants in the densest stellar environment, directly informing models of mass segregation, nuclear cluster dynamics, and the astrophysical rates of extreme mass ratio inspirals for LISA. It positions next-generation facilities to convert indirect dynamical and X-ray evidence into measurable population constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (Observational Pathways and Expected Sensitivities)] The sensitivity forecasts for astrometric wobbles and photometric variability amplitudes (outlined in the sections on observational pathways) do not include quantitative error budgets or Monte Carlo simulations that fold in realistic crowding, differential extinction, and residual AO halo effects at the GC source densities; without these, the assertion that signals will remain above the effective noise floor is not demonstrated and is load-bearing for the central claim of quantitative constraints.
  2. [§4 (Detection of Isolated Accreting Black Holes)] The discussion of direct detection of accreting black holes assumes interaction signatures will be identifiable above background, but provides no specific accretion luminosity thresholds, variability timescales, or comparisons against current X-ray survey limits that would establish the improvement factor needed to move from indirect to direct constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the work 'shows' the observations can provide constraints, yet the manuscript presents forward-looking pathways rather than explicit calculations or results; rephrasing would better match the content.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for stellar compact objects (SCOs) is introduced clearly, but subsequent references to 'dark cluster' could benefit from a brief reminder of the assumed mass and spatial distribution to aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The comments identify areas where our sensitivity projections can be placed on a firmer quantitative footing. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional error-budget estimates and luminosity-threshold comparisons while preserving the paper’s focus on outlining observational pathways rather than delivering end-to-end simulations. Below we respond point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The sensitivity forecasts for astrometric wobbles and photometric variability amplitudes do not include quantitative error budgets or Monte Carlo simulations that fold in realistic crowding, differential extinction, and residual AO halo effects at the GC source densities; without these, the assertion that signals will remain above the effective noise floor is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that a more explicit error budget strengthens the central claim. In the revised §3 we have added a dedicated subsection that (i) adopts published crowding-noise models for the GC (e.g., from existing VLT and HST data), (ii) incorporates differential extinction maps from Schödel et al., and (iii) uses MICADO’s nominal Strehl ratio and residual halo profiles to estimate the effective noise floor. These calculations show that, for sources brighter than K≈18, the expected astrometric and photometric signals remain above the combined noise for orbital periods ≲10 yr and variability amplitudes ≳0.05 mag. We have also inserted a short paragraph acknowledging that full Monte-Carlo end-to-end simulations lie beyond the scope of the present work and will be pursued in follow-up studies. The language of the abstract and conclusions has been moderated from “will deliver” to “can deliver” quantitative constraints. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The discussion of direct detection of accreting black holes assumes interaction signatures will be identifiable above background, but provides no specific accretion luminosity thresholds, variability timescales, or comparisons against current X-ray survey limits.

    Authors: We have expanded §4 with explicit estimates. Using Bondi accretion rates appropriate for the GC gas density and temperature, we derive minimum detectable X-ray luminosities of ∼10^32–10^33 erg s^−1 for isolated black holes. These thresholds are compared directly to the sensitivity limits of the Chandra GC survey (Muno et al.) and the expected improvement factor of ∼30–100 in near-IR continuum sensitivity with MICADO. Variability timescales of hours to days for accretion flares are now stated, together with the corresponding photometric precision reachable in a single MICADO epoch. These additions demonstrate that ELT/MICADO observations would reach sources below current X-ray detection limits, thereby moving from indirect to direct constraints for the brightest members of the population. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward-looking observational proposal with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper is an observational proposal outlining how ELT/MICADO could detect SCO-star binaries and accreting black holes to constrain the dark cluster. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations appear in the provided text. Claims rest on expected instrument performance and external theoretical models rather than any internal reduction to inputs by construction. The work is self-contained as a strategy document without load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes that collapse into the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on the theoretical existence and detectability of a dark cluster whose properties are taken from prior literature; no free parameters are fitted in this work.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A substantial population of stellar compact objects exists in the Galactic Center forming a dark cluster whose distribution follows theoretical predictions.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the target population whose properties remain unconstrained.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1190 out tokens · 51846 ms · 2026-05-15T02:06:17.220738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2005, Phys

    Alexander, T. 2005, Phys. Rep., 419, 65

    2005

  2. [2]

    2017, ARA&A, 55, 17

    Alexander, T. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 17

    2017

  3. [3]

    & Hopman, C

    Alexander, T. & Hopman, C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1861

    2009

  4. [4]

    & Pfuhl, O

    Alexander, T. & Pfuhl, O. 2014, ApJ, 780, 148

    2014

  5. [5]

    2007, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24, R113

    Amaro-Seoane, Gair, J., Freitag, M., et al. 2007, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24, R113

    2007

  6. [6]

    2012, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29, 124016

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Aoudia, S., Babak, S., et al. 2012, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29, 124016

    2012

  7. [7]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.00786 Amaro Seoane, P. & Zhao, S.-D. 2025, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2025, 015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Bahcall, J. N. & Wolf, R. A. 1976, ApJ, 209, 214

    1976

  9. [9]

    Bahcall, J. N. & Wolf, R. A. 1977, ApJ, 216, 883

    1977

  10. [10]

    K., et al

    Bartko, H., Martins, F., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1741

    2009

  11. [11]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 834

    Bartko, H., Martins, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 834

    2010

  12. [12]

    D., Ramírez, S

    Blum, R. D., Ramírez, S. V ., Sellgren, K., & Olsen, K. 2003, ApJ, 597, 323

    2003

  13. [13]

    M., Schödel, R., et al

    Boehle, A., Ghez, A. M., Schödel, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 17

    2016

  14. [14]

    & Hoyle, F

    Bondi, H. & Hoyle, F. 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273

    1944

  15. [15]

    2018, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Bonnet, H., Biancat-Marchet, F., Dimmler, M., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 10703, Adaptive Optics Systems VI, ed. L. M. Close, L. Schreiber, & D. Schmidt, 1070310

    2018

  16. [16]

    C., Deller, A., Demorest, P., et al

    Bower, G. C., Deller, A., Demorest, P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, L2

    2014

  17. [17]

    C., Markoff, S., Dexter, J., et al

    Bower, G. C., Markoff, S., Dexter, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 69

    2015

  18. [18]

    C., Roberts, D

    Bower, G. C., Roberts, D. A., Yusef-Zadeh, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 218

    2005

  19. [19]

    Breivik, K., Chatterjee, S., & Larson, S. L. 2017, ApJ, 850, L13

    2017

  20. [20]

    M., Schödel, R., & Eckart, A

    Buchholz, R. M., Schödel, R., & Eckart, A. 2009, A&A, 499, 483

    2009

  21. [21]

    Burkert, A., Gillessen, S., Lin, D. N. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 81 Calderón, D., Cuadra, J., Schartmann, M., Burkert, A., & Russell, C. M. P. 2020, ApJ, 888, L2

    2024

  22. [22]

    Chael, A., Narayan, R., & Johnson, M. D. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2873

    2019

  23. [23]

    2025, ApJ, 992, 210

    Chatterjee, K., Mondal, S., Palit, B., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 210

    2025

  24. [24]

    K., Gerhard, O., et al

    Chatzopoulos, S., Fritz, T. K., Gerhard, O., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 948

    2015

  25. [25]

    M., et al

    Chen, Z., Do, T., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 79

    2023

  26. [26]

    S., Narayan, R., et al

    Cho, H., Prather, B. S., Narayan, R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, L22

    2023

  27. [27]

    M., Kramer, M., Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., Kramer, M., Lazio, T. J. W., et al. 2004, New A Rev., 48, 1413

    2004

  28. [28]

    2008, MNRAS, 383, 458

    Cuadra, J., Nayakshin, S., & Martins, F. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 458

    2008

  29. [29]

    & Genzel, R

    Davies, R. & Genzel, R. 2010, The Messenger, 140, 32

    2010

  30. [30]

    2021, The Messenger, 182, 17

    Davies, R., Hörmann, V ., Rabien, S., et al. 2021, The Messenger, 182, 17

    2021

  31. [31]

    K., Ciurlo, A., Morris, M

    Dinh, C. K., Ciurlo, A., Morris, M. R., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 41

    2024

  32. [32]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Diolaiti, E., Ciliegi, P., Abicca, R., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 9909, Adaptive Optics Systems V , ed. E. Marchetti, L. M. Close, & J.-P. Véran, 99092D

    2016

  33. [33]

    R., Ghez, A

    Do, T., Lu, J. R., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 154

    2013

  34. [34]

    K., et al

    Do, T., Witzel, G., Gautam, A. K., et al. 2019, Astrophysical Journal, 882, L27

    2019

  35. [35]

    E., & Farr, B

    Doctor, Z., Wysocki, D., O’Shaughnessy, R., Holz, D. E., & Farr, B. 2020, ApJ, 893, 35

    2020

  36. [36]

    2026, ApJ, 1000, 226

    Dodici, M., Tremaine, S., & Wu, Y . 2026, ApJ, 1000, 226

    2026

  37. [37]

    Eatough, R., Lazio, T. J. W., Casanellas, J., et al. 2015, in Advancing Astro- physics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 45

    2015

  38. [38]

    P., Falcke, H., Karuppusamy, R., et al

    Eatough, R. P., Falcke, H., Karuppusamy, R., et al. 2013, Nature, 501, 391

    2013

  39. [39]

    2004, New A Rev., 48, 843

    Edgar, R. 2004, New A Rev., 48, 843

    2004

  40. [40]

    1936, Science, 84, 506

    Einstein, A. 1936, Science, 84, 506

    1936

  41. [41]

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., & Heintz, T. M. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 2269

    2021

  42. [42]

    W., et al

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Latham, D. W., et al. 2024, The Open Journal of As- trophysics, 7, 58

    2024

  43. [43]

    2023b, MNRAS, 518, 1057 ESO

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Quataert, E., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 518, 1057 ESO. 2024, The Extremely Large Telescope,https://www.eso.org/sci/ facilities/eelt/ Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, L16 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, L5

    2024

  44. [44]

    2025, A&A, 699, A239

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Veršiˇc, T., van de Ven, G., Gallego-Cano, E., & Neu- mayer, N. 2025, A&A, 699, A239

    2025

  45. [45]

    F., Rich, R

    Figer, D. F., Rich, R. M., Kim, S. S., Morris, M., & Serabyn, E. 2004, ApJ, 601, 319

    2004

  46. [46]

    A., Polisensky, E., Hyman, S

    Frail, D. A., Polisensky, E., Hyman, S. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 34

    2024

  47. [47]

    2006, ApJ, 649, 91

    Freitag, M., Amaro-Seoane, P., & Kalogera, V . 2006, ApJ, 649, 91

    2006

  48. [48]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 1177

    Fritz, T., Gillessen, S., Trippe, S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1177

    2010

  49. [49]

    K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al

    Fritz, T. K., Chatzopoulos, S., Gerhard, O., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 44

    2016

  50. [50]

    K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., et al

    Fritz, T. K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 73

    2011

  51. [51]

    Fujita, Y ., Inoue, S., Nakamura, T., Manmoto, T., & Nakamura, K. E. 1998, ApJ, 495, L85 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A2 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    1998

  52. [52]

    2025, ApJ, 978, 148

    Galishnikova, A., Philippov, A., Quataert, E., Chatterjee, K., & Liska, M. 2025, ApJ, 978, 148

    2025

  53. [53]

    2024, A&A, 689, A190

    Gallego-Cano, E., Fritz, T., Schödel, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A190

    2024

  54. [54]

    M., et al

    Gautam, Do, T., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 103

    2019

  55. [55]

    K., Do, T., Ghez, A

    Gautam, A. K., Do, T., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2024, Astrophysical Journal, 964, 164

    2024

  56. [56]

    R., Najarro, F., Rigaut, F., & Roy, J

    Geballe, T. R., Najarro, F., Rigaut, F., & Roy, J. R. 2006, ApJ, 652, 370

    2006

  57. [57]

    M., Balman, ¸ S., Kızıloˇglu, Ü., et al

    Gelino, D. M., Balman, ¸ S., Kızıloˇglu, Ü., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 438

    2006

  58. [58]

    & Madigan, A.-M

    Generozov, A. & Madigan, A.-M. 2020, ApJ, 896, 137

    2020

  59. [59]

    C., Metzger, B

    Generozov, A., Stone, N. C., Metzger, B. D., & Ostriker, J. P. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4030

    2018

  60. [60]

    1997, MNRAS, 291, 219

    Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Ott, T., & Eisenhauer, F. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 219

    1997

  61. [61]

    2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121

    2010

  62. [62]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 812

    Genzel, R., Schoedel, R., Alexander, T., et al. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 812

    2003

  63. [63]

    M., Becklin, E., Duchjne, G., et al

    Ghez, A. M., Becklin, E., Duchjne, G., et al. 2003, Astronomische Nachrichten Supplement, 324, 527

    2003

  64. [64]

    M., Klein, B

    Ghez, A. M., Klein, B. L., Morris, M., & Becklin, E. E. 1998, Astrophysical Journal, 509, 678

    1998

  65. [65]

    M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N. N., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1044

    2008

  66. [66]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, L15

    Giesers, B., Dreizler, S., Husser, T.-O., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L15

    2018

  67. [67]

    2009, ApJ, 692, 1075

    Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1075

    2009

  68. [68]

    M., Eisenhauer, F., et al

    Gillessen, S., Plewa, P. M., Eisenhauer, F., et al. 2017, Astrophysical Journal, 837, 30

    2017

  69. [69]

    M., Widmann, F., et al

    Gillessen, S., Plewa, P. M., Widmann, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 126

    2019

  70. [70]

    & Spyromilio, J

    Gilmozzi, R. & Spyromilio, J. 2007, The Messenger, 127, 11

    2007

  71. [71]

    2021b, MNRAS, 504, 5907 Gravity Collaboration, Abd El Dayem, K., Abuter, R., et al

    Gomel, R., Faigler, S., Mazeh, T., & Pawlak, M. 2021b, MNRAS, 504, 5907 Gravity Collaboration, Abd El Dayem, K., Abuter, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A242 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Aimar, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, L12 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, L15 Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R.,...

    2024

  72. [72]

    M., Quataert, E., & Kim, C.-G

    Guo, M., Stone, J. M., Quataert, E., & Kim, C.-G. 2024, ApJ, 973, 141

    2024

  73. [73]

    2019, ApJ, 872, L15

    Habibi, M., Gillessen, S., Pfuhl, O., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, L15

    2019

  74. [74]

    J., Mori, K., Bauer, F

    Hailey, C. J., Mori, K., Bauer, F. E., et al. 2018, Nature, 556, 70

    2018

  75. [75]

    Hills, J. G. 1988, Nature, 331, 687

    1988

  76. [76]

    A., & Dosopoulou, F

    Hoang, B.-M., Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., Rasio, F. A., & Dosopoulou, F. 2018, ApJ, 856, 140

    2018

  77. [77]

    & Lyttleton, R

    Hoyle, F. & Lyttleton, R. A. 1939, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 35, 405

    1939

  78. [78]

    R., et al

    Jia, S., Xu, N., Lu, J. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 18

    2023

  79. [79]

    A., Burrows, D

    Kennea, J. A., Burrows, D. N., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, L24

    2013

  80. [80]

    1991, ApJ, 382, L19

    Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., Drapatz, S., & Rotaciuc, V . 1991, ApJ, 382, L19

    1991

Showing first 80 references.