pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15130 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Asymptotically Self-Similar Blowup for 3D Incompressible Euler with C^{1, 1/3-} Velocity II: 3D Profiles, Blowup, and Limiting behavior

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords 3D Eulerself-similar blowupaxisymmetric flowsingularity formationC^{1,α} regularityasymptotically self-similar1D modelHou-Zhang scenario
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 3D incompressible Euler equations without swirl admit exact C^{1,α} self-similar blowup profiles for every α below 1/3, which are reached asymptotically from C_c^α initial vorticity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs exact self-similar blowup profiles for the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations without swirl that belong to the regularity class C^{1,α} for any α in (0, 1/3). These profiles are obtained by lifting smooth one-dimensional blowup solutions through a fixed-point argument that controls the three-dimensional structure with anisotropic weights. Solutions starting from compactly supported C^α vorticity and C^{1,α} velocity are then shown to approach the profiles after rescaling, producing finite-time blowup. As α approaches 1/3 from below, the spatial blowup rate diverges while the profile converges in a weighted norm to a multiple of the scaled one-dimensional profile. The construction is presented as sharp because global regularity is already known to hold once the velocity regularity exceeds C^{1,1/3}.

Core claim

For any α ∈ (0, 1/3), exact C^{1,α} self-similar blowup profiles exist for the 3D incompressible Euler equation without swirl. These profiles are obtained by lifting C^∞ blowup profiles of a 1D model via a fixed-point argument. The associated solutions exhibit asymptotically self-similar blowup when started from C_c^α initial vorticity and C^{1,α} ∩ L² initial velocity. As α → (1/3)^− the spatial blowup rate diverges to infinity while the profile converges in a weighted L^∞ norm to a nonzero multiple of r^{1/3} W̄_{1/3}(z).

What carries the argument

Anisotropic weighted estimates combined with an integration-by-parts identity along particle trajectories that applies the Euler equation twice to handle the missing radial decay.

Load-bearing premise

The fixed-point map defined from the one-dimensional approximate profile is a contraction in the anisotropic weighted space, and the finite-codimension stability argument holds in the low-regularity C^{1,α} topology.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation initialized exactly on one of the constructed profiles that remains globally smooth past the predicted finite blowup time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15130 by Jiajie Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lifting construction and limiting behavior as α → ( 1 3 ) −. Ω¯ α is the blowup profile for r −αω θ . W¯ α and Wα¯ are the blowup profiles for the 1D model, and ¯α = 1 3 . 1.2.1. Lifting 1D singularities. Following [43], we derive a gCLM-type 1D model (2.22) in z ∈ R along the axis r = 0. For α < 1 3 sufficiently close to 1 3 , we extend the blowup profiles W¯ α for the 1D model constructed in [11] constan… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For any $\alpha \in (0, 1/3)$, we construct exact $C^{1,\alpha}$ self-similar blowup profiles for the 3D incompressible Euler equation without swirl, and build on them to prove asymptotically self-similar blowup from $C_c^\alpha$ initial vorticity and $C^{1,\alpha}\cap L^2$ initial velocity. Moreover, we provide a complete characterization of the limiting behavior of the $C^{1,\alpha}$ blowup profiles and the associated $C^{1,\alpha}$ blowup solutions as $\alpha\to(1/3)^-$. Specifically, as $\alpha \to(1/3)^-$, the spatial blowup rate $c_{x,\alpha}$ diverges to $\infty$, while the $C^{1,\alpha}$ blowup profile $\Omega_{*,\alpha}^{\theta}$ asymptotically factorizes and converges strongly in a weighted $L^\infty$ norm to a nonzero constant multiple of $r^{1/3} \bar W_{1/3 }(z)$, where $ \bar W_{1/3}$ is a $C^\infty$ 1D blowup profile. Our construction is inspired by the Hou--Zhang blowup scenario. Using a fixed-point argument, we lift the $C^\infty$ blowup profiles for a 1D model constructed in the companion work [11] to exact 3D blowup profiles. To overcome the lack of $r$-directional decay in the approximate profile and capture the anisotropic structure, we develop a family of anisotropic weighted estimates and introduce a crucial integration-by-parts method along trajectories that exploits the equation twice. We then develop a finite codimension stability argument in a low-regularity setting to prove stability of the 3D profiles and establish asymptotically self-similar blowup. This blowup result is sharp in view of the global regularity theory for axisymmetric Euler without swirl with $C^{1,1/3+}\cap L^2$ initial velocity. To the best of our knowledge, our results provide the first example in which a singularity from a 1D nonlocal fluid model is lifted to construct blowup for incompressible fluid equations in $\mathbb{R}^2$ or $\mathbb{R}^3$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs, for every α ∈ (0, 1/3), exact C^{1,α} self-similar blowup profiles for the 3D axisymmetric incompressible Euler equations without swirl by lifting C^∞ 1D profiles from the companion paper [11] via a fixed-point map in an anisotropic weighted space. It then proves that these profiles are stable in a finite-codimension sense, yielding asymptotically self-similar blowup from C_c^α initial vorticity and C^{1,α} ∩ L^2 initial velocity. The authors also characterize the limiting behavior: as α → (1/3)^− the spatial blowup rate c_{x,α} diverges while the profile Ω_{*,α}^θ converges strongly in a weighted L^∞ norm to a nonzero multiple of r^{1/3} W̄_{1/3}(z). The construction relies on new anisotropic weighted estimates and an integration-by-parts identity along particle trajectories that exploits the Euler equation twice.

Significance. If the fixed-point contraction and stability arguments close, the work supplies the first explicit lifting of a 1D nonlocal singularity to a 3D incompressible Euler blowup, which is of substantial interest given the global regularity theorems available for C^{1,1/3+} data. The technical innovations—anisotropic weights that compensate for the missing r-decay and the double exploitation of the Euler equation in the integration-by-parts step—are likely to be reusable in related problems. The sharp limiting statement as α approaches the critical exponent 1/3 also clarifies the borderline between blowup and regularity.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Fixed-point construction): The contraction mapping argument for the lifting map is load-bearing. The anisotropic weights are asserted to control the r-nonlocal Biot-Savart contributions, yet the 1D approximate profile has no r-decay; an explicit bound showing that the size of the 1D approximation error is strictly smaller than the reciprocal of the Lipschitz constant of the nonlocal operator in the C^{1,α} topology (uniformly down to α near 1/3) is required. Without this quantitative estimate the contraction constant may exceed 1.
  2. [§4] §4 (Stability analysis): The finite-codimension stability in the low-regularity C^{1,α} topology rests on the integration-by-parts identity that exploits the Euler equation twice. A detailed verification that this identity closes the estimates for the axisymmetric Biot-Savart operator (including control of the error terms generated by the lack of r-decay) must be supplied; the current outline leaves open whether the resulting constants remain bounded as α → (1/3)^−.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The dependence on the companion paper [11] for the 1D profiles should be stated more explicitly in the introduction and in the statement of the main theorems, including which properties of the 1D profiles are used verbatim.
  2. [Preliminaries] Notation for the weighted spaces and the precise form of the anisotropic weights should be collected in a single preliminary section rather than introduced piecemeal.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the fixed-point construction and stability analysis. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative estimates and detailed verifications.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Fixed-point construction): The contraction mapping argument for the lifting map is load-bearing. The anisotropic weights are asserted to control the r-nonlocal Biot-Savart contributions, yet the 1D approximate profile has no r-decay; an explicit bound showing that the size of the 1D approximation error is strictly smaller than the reciprocal of the Lipschitz constant of the nonlocal operator in the C^{1,α} topology (uniformly down to α near 1/3) is required. Without this quantitative estimate the contraction constant may exceed 1.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative bound is required to rigorously close the contraction. In the revised manuscript we have added Lemma 3.7, which derives an explicit upper bound on the C^{1,α} norm of the 1D approximation error. The bound is O(1-3α) and is shown to be strictly smaller than the reciprocal of the Lipschitz constant of the axisymmetric Biot-Savart operator in the same topology, uniformly for all α ∈ (0,1/3). The proof uses the anisotropic weighted estimates already developed in §3 together with the specific decay properties of the 1D profile from the companion paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Stability analysis): The finite-codimension stability in the low-regularity C^{1,α} topology rests on the integration-by-parts identity that exploits the Euler equation twice. A detailed verification that this identity closes the estimates for the axisymmetric Biot-Savart operator (including control of the error terms generated by the lack of r-decay) must be supplied; the current outline leaves open whether the resulting constants remain bounded as α → (1/3)^−.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The revised Section 4 now contains a complete, self-contained verification of the integration-by-parts identity. We explicitly compute every error term arising from the axisymmetric Biot-Savart operator and from the absence of r-decay, showing that the double exploitation of the Euler equation cancels the leading singular contributions. The resulting constants are tracked explicitly in α and remain bounded as α → (1/3)^− because the anisotropic weights are chosen precisely to absorb the r-non-decay uniformly in this limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to companion 1D profiles; 3D lifting and stability arguments remain independent

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "Using a fixed-point argument, we lift the C^∞ blowup profiles for a 1D model constructed in the companion work [11] to exact 3D blowup profiles."

    The central existence claim for the 3D profiles is conditioned on the prior construction of the 1D profiles in [11] (same-author companion). While the lifting map itself is new, the overall result inherits its starting point from the self-citation, satisfying the definition of a load-bearing self-citation even though the subsequent analytic steps are independent.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with 1D C^∞ profiles imported from companion paper [11] and then applies a fixed-point map in anisotropic weighted spaces plus finite-codimension stability to produce the 3D C^{1,α} profiles. The fixed-point contraction and integration-by-parts identities along trajectories are developed and verified inside the present manuscript; they do not reduce by definition or algebraic identity to the imported 1D data. The self-citation therefore supplies an external base case rather than a load-bearing tautology, keeping overall circularity low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of a contraction mapping in an anisotropic weighted space and on the stability of the constructed profiles; both are domain assumptions standard in PDE analysis but not independently verified here. No new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The 1D blowup profiles constructed in the companion paper [11] are C^∞ and satisfy the required decay and symmetry properties
    These profiles are lifted via fixed-point to obtain the 3D profiles.
  • domain assumption The fixed-point operator is a contraction in the chosen family of anisotropic weighted spaces
    This is the key step that produces exact 3D self-similar profiles.
  • domain assumption The finite-codimension stability argument holds in the low-regularity C^{1,α} topology
    Required to pass from the profile to asymptotically self-similar blowup for nearby initial data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5749 in / 1891 out tokens · 95439 ms · 2026-05-15T03:07:51.749800+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Finite time singularities in the Landau equation with very hard potentials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05981, 2026

    Jacob Bedrossian, Jiajie Chen, Maria Pia Gualdani, Sehyun Ji, Vlad Vicol, and Jincheng Yang. Finite time singularities in the Landau equation with very hard potentials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05981, 2026

  2. [2]

    Smooth imploding solutions for 3D com- pressible fluids

    Tristan Buckmaster, Gonzalo Cao-Labora, and Javier G´ omez-Serrano. Smooth imploding solutions for 3D com- pressible fluids. InForum of Mathematics, Pi, volume 13, page e6. Cambridge University Press, 2025

  3. [3]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2018

    Theo B¨ uhler and Dietmar A Salamon.Functional analysis, volume 191. American Mathematical Soc., 2018

  4. [4]

    Bojin Chen, De Huang, and Xiangyuan Li. Novel self-similar finite-time blowups with singular profiles of the 1D Hou-Luo model and the 2D Boussinesq equations: A numerical investigation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01868, 2026

  5. [5]

    Singularity formation and global well-posedness for the generalized Constantin–Lax–Majda equation with dissipation.Nonlinearity, 33(5):2502, 2020

    Jiajie Chen. Singularity formation and global well-posedness for the generalized Constantin–Lax–Majda equation with dissipation.Nonlinearity, 33(5):2502, 2020

  6. [6]

    On the slightly perturbed De Gregorio model onS 1.Arch

    Jiajie Chen. On the slightly perturbed De Gregorio model onS 1.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 241(3):1843–1869, 2021

  7. [7]

    Nearly self-similar blowup of the slightly perturbed homogeneous Landau equation with very soft potentials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11511, 2023

    Jiajie Chen. Nearly self-similar blowup of the slightly perturbed homogeneous Landau equation with very soft potentials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11511, 2023

  8. [8]

    On the regularity of the De Gregorio model for the 3D Euler equations.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(4):1619–1677, 2023

    Jiajie Chen. On the regularity of the De Gregorio model for the 3D Euler equations.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(4):1619–1677, 2023

  9. [9]

    Remarks on the smoothness of theC 1,α asymptotically self-similar singularity in the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations.Nonlinearity, 37(6):065018, 2024

    Jiajie Chen. Remarks on the smoothness of theC 1,α asymptotically self-similar singularity in the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations.Nonlinearity, 37(6):065018, 2024

  10. [10]

    Vorticity blowup in Compressible Euler equations inR d, d≥3.Annals of PDE, 11(2):21, 2025

    Jiajie Chen. Vorticity blowup in Compressible Euler equations inR d, d≥3.Annals of PDE, 11(2):21, 2025

  11. [11]

    Asymptotically self-similar blowup for 3D incompressible Euler withC 1,1/3− velocity I:C ∞ 1D limiting profiles.preprint, 2026

    Jiajie Chen. Asymptotically self-similar blowup for 3D incompressible Euler withC 1,1/3− velocity I:C ∞ 1D limiting profiles.preprint, 2026

  12. [12]

    Vorticity blowup in 2D compressible Euler equations

    Jiajie Chen, Giorgio Cialdea, Steve Shkoller, and Vlad Vicol. Vorticity blowup in 2D compressible Euler equations. To appear in Duke Math. J., arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06455, 2024

  13. [13]

    Chen and T

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y Hou. Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations with smooth data II: Rigorous numerics.arXiv preprint: arXiv:2305.05660. 3D PROFILES, BLOWUP, AND LIMITING BEHAVIOR 131

  14. [14]

    Finite time blowup of 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations withC 1,α velocity and boundary.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 383(3):1559–1667, 2021

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y Hou. Finite time blowup of 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations withC 1,α velocity and boundary.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 383(3):1559–1667, 2021

  15. [15]

    Chen and T

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y Hou. Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations with smooth data I: Analysis.arXiv preprint: arXiv:2210.07191v3, 2022

  16. [16]

    Singularity formation in 3D Euler equations with smooth initial data and boundary.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(27):e2500940122, 2025

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y Hou. Singularity formation in 3D Euler equations with smooth initial data and boundary.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(27):e2500940122, 2025

  17. [17]

    On the finite time blowup of the De Gregorio model for the 3D Euler equations.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 74(6):1282–1350, 2021

    Jiajie Chen, Thomas Y Hou, and De Huang. On the finite time blowup of the De Gregorio model for the 3D Euler equations.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 74(6):1282–1350, 2021

  18. [18]

    Asymptotically self-similar blowup of the Hou–Luo model for the 3D Euler equations.Annals of PDE, 8(2):24, 2022

    Jiajie Chen, Thomas Y Hou, and De Huang. Asymptotically self-similar blowup of the Hou–Luo model for the 3D Euler equations.Annals of PDE, 8(2):24, 2022

  19. [19]

    Smooth and stable Euler implosions.arXiv preprint, 2026

    Jiajie Chen, Steve Shkoller, and Vlad Vicol. Smooth and stable Euler implosions.arXiv preprint, 2026

  20. [20]

    On the finite-time blowup of a 1D model for the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations.CPAM, 70(11):2218–2243, 2017

    K Choi, TY Hou, A Kiselev, G Luo, V Sverak, and Y Yao. On the finite-time blowup of a 1D model for the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations.CPAM, 70(11):2218–2243, 2017

  21. [21]

    Finite time blow up for a 1D model of 2D Boussinesq system.Comm

    K Choi, A Kiselev, and Y Yao. Finite time blow up for a 1D model of 2D Boussinesq system.Comm. Math. Phys., 334(3):1667–1679, 2015

  22. [22]

    On the Euler equations of incompressible fluids.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 44(4):603–621, 2007

    P Constantin. On the Euler equations of incompressible fluids.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 44(4):603–621, 2007

  23. [23]

    P Constantin, P. D. Lax, and A. Majda. A simple one-dimensional model for the three-dimensional vorticity equation.CPAM, 38(6):715–724, 1985

  24. [24]

    Formation of singularities for a transport equation with nonlocal velocity.Annals of Mathematics, pages 1377–1389, 2005

    A C´ ordoba, D C´ ordoba, and MA Fontelos. Formation of singularities for a transport equation with nonlocal velocity.Annals of Mathematics, pages 1377–1389, 2005

  25. [25]

    Finite-time singularity via multi-layer de- generate pendula for the 2D Boussinesq equation with uniformC 1, √ 4/3−1−ϵ ∩L2 force.Advances in Mathematics, 480:110480, 2025

    Diego C´ ordoba, Andr´ es La´ ın-Sanclemente, and Luis Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Finite-time singularity via multi-layer de- generate pendula for the 2D Boussinesq equation with uniformC 1, √ 4/3−1−ϵ ∩L2 force.Advances in Mathematics, 480:110480, 2025

  26. [26]

    Blow-up for the incompressible 3d-euler equations with uniformc1, 1 2 −ϵ ∩ l2 force.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08495, 2023

    Diego C´ ordoba and Luis Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Blow-up for the incompressible 3d-euler equations with uniformc1, 1 2 −ϵ ∩ l2 force.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08495, 2023

  27. [27]

    Finite time singularities of smooth solutions for the 2D incompressible porous media (ipm) equation with a smooth source.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22920, 2024

    Diego C´ ordoba and Luis Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Finite time singularities of smooth solutions for the 2D incompressible porous media (ipm) equation with a smooth source.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22920, 2024

  28. [28]

    Cordoba, L

    Diego Cordoba, Luis Martinez-Zoroa, and Fan Zheng. Finite time singularities to the 3D incompressible Euler equations for solutions inC 1,α ∩C ∞(R3\{0})∩L 2.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12197, 2023

  29. [29]

    Axisymmetric incompressible flows with bounded vorticity.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 62(3):475–496, 2007

    Raphael Danchin. Axisymmetric incompressible flows with bounded vorticity.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 62(3):475–496, 2007

  30. [30]

    On a one-dimensional model for the three-dimensional vorticity equation.Journal of Statistical Physics, 59(5-6):1251–1263, 1990

    S De Gregorio. On a one-dimensional model for the three-dimensional vorticity equation.Journal of Statistical Physics, 59(5-6):1251–1263, 1990

  31. [31]

    Singlarity formation in the incompressible Euler equation in finite and infinite time.arXiv:2203.17221v1, 2022

    Theodore D Drivas and Tarek M Elgindi. Singlarity formation in the incompressible Euler equation in finite and infinite time.arXiv:2203.17221v1, 2022

  32. [32]

    Finite-time singularity formation forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R3.Annals of Mathematics, 194(3):647–727, 2021

    Tarek M Elgindi. Finite-time singularity formation forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R3.Annals of Mathematics, 194(3):647–727, 2021

  33. [33]

    On the stability of self-similar blow-up forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations onR 3.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14071, 2019

    Tarek M Elgindi, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, and Nader Masmoudi. On the stability of self-similar blow-up forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations onR 3.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14071, 2019

  34. [34]

    Finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the axi-symmetric 3D Euler equations.Annals of PDE, 5(2):1–51, 2019

    Tarek M Elgindi and In-Jee Jeong. Finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the axi-symmetric 3D Euler equations.Annals of PDE, 5(2):1–51, 2019

  35. [35]

    Elgindi and In-Jee Jeong

    Tarek M. Elgindi and In-Jee Jeong. On the effects of advection and vortex stretching.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Oct 2019

  36. [36]

    Finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the Boussinesq system

    Tarek M Elgindi and In-Jee Jeong. Finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the Boussinesq system. Annals of PDE, 6:1–50, 2020

  37. [37]

    From instability to singularity formation in incompressible fluids

    Tarek M Elgindi and Federico Pasqualotto. From instability to singularity formation in incompressible fluids. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19780, 2023

  38. [38]

    Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000

    Klaus-Jochen Engel and Rainer Nagel.One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations, volume 194 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000. With contributions by S. Brendle, M. Campiti, T. Hahn, G. Metafune, G. Nickel, D. Pallara, C. Perazzoli, A. Rhandi, S. Romanelli and R. Schnaubelt

  39. [39]

    Springer, 1998

    David Gilbarg, Neil S Trudinger, David Gilbarg, and NS Trudinger.Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, volume 2. Springer, 1998

  40. [40]

    Israel Gohberg, Seymour Goldberg, and Marinus A Kaashoek.Classes of Linear Operators Vol. I. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications. Birkh¨ auser Basel, 1 edition, 2013

  41. [41]

    Numerical computation of 3D incompressible ideal fluids with swirl.Physical Review Letters, 67(25):3511, 1991

    R Grauer and TC Sideris. Numerical computation of 3D incompressible ideal fluids with swirl.Physical Review Letters, 67(25):3511, 1991

  42. [42]

    A potential two-scale traveling wave singularity for 3D incompressible Euler equations.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, page 133257, 2022

    Thomas Y Hou and De Huang. A potential two-scale traveling wave singularity for 3D incompressible Euler equations.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, page 133257, 2022. 132 JIAJIE CHEN

  43. [43]

    Potential singularity of the axisymmetric euler equations with initial vorticity for a large range ofα.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 22(4):1326–1364, 2024

    Thomas Y Hou and Shumao Zhang. Potential singularity of the axisymmetric euler equations with initial vorticity for a large range ofα.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 22(4):1326–1364, 2024

  44. [44]

    Blow-up or no blow-up? a unified computational and analytic approach to 3D incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.Acta Numerica, 18(1):277–346, 2009

    TY Hou. Blow-up or no blow-up? a unified computational and analytic approach to 3D incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.Acta Numerica, 18(1):277–346, 2009

  45. [45]

    On the stabilizing effect of convection in three-dimensional incompressible flows.Communi- cations on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 62(4):501–564, 2009

    TY Hou and Z Lei. On the stabilizing effect of convection in three-dimensional incompressible flows.Communi- cations on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 62(4):501–564, 2009

  46. [46]

    Dynamic stability of the three-dimensional axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations with swirl

    TY Hou and C Li. Dynamic stability of the three-dimensional axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations with swirl. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 61(5):661–697, 2008

  47. [47]

    Dynamic depletion of vortex stretching and non-blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equations.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 16(6):639–664, 2006

    TY Hou and R Li. Dynamic depletion of vortex stretching and non-blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equations.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 16(6):639–664, 2006

  48. [48]

    Self-similar finite-time blowups with smooth profiles of the generalized constantin–lax–majda model.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 248(2):22, 2024

    De Huang, Xiang Qin, Xiuyuan Wang, and Dongyi Wei. Self-similar finite-time blowups with smooth profiles of the generalized constantin–lax–majda model.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 248(2):22, 2024

  49. [49]

    Exact self-similar finite-time blowup of the hou–luo model with smooth profiles.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(10):243, 2025

    De Huang, Xiang Qin, Xiuyuan Wang, and Dongyi Wei. Exact self-similar finite-time blowup of the hou–luo model with smooth profiles.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(10):243, 2025

  50. [50]

    Evidence for a singularity of the three-dimensional, incompressible Euler equations.Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 5(7):1725–1746, 1993

    RM Kerr. Evidence for a singularity of the three-dimensional, incompressible Euler equations.Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 5(7):1725–1746, 1993

  51. [51]

    Small scale creation for solutions of the incompressible two dimensional Euler equation

    A Kiselev and V Sverak. Small scale creation for solutions of the incompressible two dimensional Euler equation. Annals of Mathematics, 180:1205–1220, 2014

  52. [52]

    Toward the finite-time blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equations: a numerical investigation.SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 12(4):1722–1776, 2014

    G Luo and TY Hou. Toward the finite-time blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equations: a numerical investigation.SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 12(4):1722–1776, 2014

  53. [53]

    Cambridge University Press, 2002

    AJ Majda and AL Bertozzi.Vorticity and incompressible flow, volume 27. Cambridge University Press, 2002

  54. [54]

    On the implosion of a compressible fluid II: singularity formation.Ann

    Frank Merle, Pierre Rapha¨ el, Igor Rodnianski, and Jeremie Szeftel. On the implosion of a compressible fluid II: singularity formation.Ann. of Math. (2), 196(2):779–889, 2022

  55. [55]

    On a generalization of the Constantin–Lax–Majda equation.Nonlinearity, 21(10):2447–2461, 2008

    H Okamoto, T Sakajo, and M Wunsch. On a generalization of the Constantin–Lax–Majda equation.Nonlinearity, 21(10):2447–2461, 2008

  56. [56]

    Development of singular solutions to the axisymmetric Euler equations.Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics (1989-1993), 4(7):1472–1491, 1992

    A Pumir and ED Siggia. Development of singular solutions to the axisymmetric Euler equations.Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics (1989-1993), 4(7):1472–1491, 1992

  57. [57]

    Remarks on axisymmetric solutions of the incompressible euler system.Communications in partial differential equations, 19(1-2):321–334, 1994

    X Saint Raymond. Remarks on axisymmetric solutions of the incompressible euler system.Communications in partial differential equations, 19(1-2):321–334, 1994

  58. [58]

    Incompressible Euler Blowup at the $C^{1,\frac{1}{3}}$ Threshold

    Steve Shkoller. Incompressible Euler blowup at theC 1, 1 3 threshold.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10945, 2026

  59. [59]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2012

    Gerald Teschl.Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 140. American Mathematical Soc., 2012

  60. [60]

    Wang, C.-Y

    Y. Wang, C.-Y. Lai, J. G´ omez-Serrano, and T. Buckmaster. Asymptotic self-similar blow-up profile for three- dimensional axisymmetric euler equations using neural networks.Physical Review Letters, 130(24):244002, 2023

  61. [61]

    Discovery of unstable singularities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14185, 2025

    Yongji Wang, Mehdi Bennani, James Martens, S´ ebastien Racani` ere, Sam Blackwell, Alex Matthews, Stanislav Nikolov, Gonzalo Cao-Labora, Daniel S Park, Martin Arjovsky, et al. Discovery of unstable singularities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14185, 2025. Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. Email address:jiajiechen@uchicago.edu