pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18964 · v1 · pith:SNIOMCWXnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Modave lectures on energy conditions in quantum field theory and semi-classical gravity

Jackson R. Fliss This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords energy conditionsquantum field theorysemi-classical gravitysingularity theoremsaveraged null energy conditionquantum energy inequalitieseffective field theory
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:SNIOMCWX Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{SNIOMCWX}

Prints a linked pith:SNIOMCWX badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Even the simplest quantum field theories violate local energy conditions, but averaging over regions and bounds relating energy to quantum information can still constrain energy densities in quantum field theory coupled to gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews classical energy conditions and their role in proving singularity theorems for gravitational solutions. It then turns to quantum fields coupled to gravity, noting that even simple quantum theories violate local energy conditions. The review discusses how integrating energy densities over spacetime regions or using relations between energy and quantum information quantities like entanglement entropy can yield viable bounds. These constraints have implications for treating quantum field theory coupled to gravity as an effective theory and for understanding quantum gravity more broadly.

Core claim

The paper claims that while local energy conditions fail in quantum field theory, averaged energy conditions and quantum energy inequalities remain useful for constraining possible semi-classical gravitational configurations and guiding the search for a consistent quantum gravity theory.

What carries the argument

Averaged energy conditions, such as the averaged null energy condition, and quantum energy inequalities that relate integrated energy densities to quantum correlations or entropy measures.

Load-bearing premise

The semi-classical approximation remains valid for the regimes in which the averaged or information-based bounds are applied, without requiring a full non-perturbative quantum gravity completion.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation in a trusted semi-classical regime showing that an averaged energy condition fails in a manner that permits unphysical gravitational solutions would falsify the claim that these bounds effectively constrain energy densities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18964 by Jackson R. Fliss.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A null geodesic, γ, wrapping a compact direction in spacetime. Be￾cause of Casimir energy, the averaged null energy along this geodesic is infinitely negative. The causal line, in red, connecting separate points in γ exclude this example from the achronal ANEC. We now perform a coordinate transformation x + → u(x +). Because of the infinite dimen￾sional symmetry of 2d CFTs there exists a unitary operator, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A lightsheet L coarse grained into disjoint collections of null rays, i.e. pencils, of transverse width a d−2 . where the lightsheet field ϕˆ is related to a chiral CFT field on the pencil Pp by ϕˆ(x +, ⃗y⊥,p) = a 2−d 2 φp(x +). For the null energy density integrated along the null line contained in pencil Pp we can utilize the properties of the chiral CFT living on that pencil and the 2d bound (3.39) to f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The Penrose diagram of the maximally extended Schwarzschild space￾time. A causal curve, γ, emanating from past null infinity, J −, can either escape to future null infinity J + within the same connected component, or it can fall into the singularity. It cannot however traverse the spacelike wormhole to reach a separate component of null infinity. J + J − J + J − ← γ . . [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Topological censoreship: regardless of what happens in the interior of the spacetime, a causal curve γ from J − to J + must be deformable to a timelike curve connecting a single connected component of J − ∪ J +. outward and future directed. Very far away from the wormhole the metric is locally flat and takes the form ds 2 ≈ −dt 2 + dr 2 + r 2 dΩ2 d−2 . (4.1) Null geodesics shot inward (i.e. to decreasing r… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The QNEC set-up. The codimension-2 surface Γ is an entangling surface for A with vanishing null expansion at ¯x. We consider the second variation of SA with respect to a small deformation of Γ in a null direction pointing towards the interior of A. relation of a local energy density to a quantum information quantity and as such brings the rich and rigid structure that quantum information theory must satisf… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The set-up for the free field proof the QNEC. The null deformation is localized to a fixed pencil, P, and for small enough transverse area can be regarded as a translation along that pencil generated by vacuum modular Hamiltonian. A key feature is that the state restricted to a specific pencil, P, (namely the one containing null deformation) and reduced up to null cut of L, is “close” to the vacuum for sma… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We review well known classical energy conditions and their implications for gravitational solutions, including the celebrated Hawking and Penrose singularity theorems. We then consider quantum fields coupled to gravity, where the topic becomes both richer and more subtle, as even the simplest quantum theories violate local energy conditions. We discuss directions for constraining energy densities in quantum field theories, including averaging over regions of spacetime and bounds relating energy and quantum information. We explore implications of these bounds for quantum field theory coupled to gravity as an effective theory and discuss how they guide our understanding of quantum gravity more broadly. These notes are based on a series of lectures given at the XXI Modave Summer School in Mathematical Sciences.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews classical energy conditions in general relativity and their implications for singularity theorems (Hawking, Penrose), then examines violations of local energy conditions by quantum fields. It covers averaged energy conditions, quantum inequalities, and information-theoretic bounds, discussing their use in constraining energy densities for quantum field theory coupled to gravity as an effective theory and their broader guidance for quantum gravity. The notes are based on lectures at the XXI Modave Summer School.

Significance. As a pedagogical review of established results, the work provides a clear synthesis of classical-to-quantum transitions in energy conditions, emphasizing averaged and quantum-information bounds that remain useful in semi-classical regimes. This is valuable for students and researchers working on effective theories of gravity, with strengths in its reliance on previously published theorems and absence of new unsubstantiated derivations.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract mentions implications for quantum gravity but the manuscript could briefly note the boundary between semi-classical validity and the need for full quantum gravity in the concluding section.
  2. Some figure captions (e.g., those illustrating averaged null energy condition violations) would benefit from explicit labels for the spacetime regions being averaged to improve readability for lecture-note users.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the review highlights the pedagogical synthesis of classical energy conditions, their quantum violations, and the role of averaged and information-theoretic bounds in semi-classical gravity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review lecture notes with no circular derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

This manuscript is a set of lecture notes reviewing classical energy conditions, their role in singularity theorems, quantum violations of local conditions, and established averaged/information-theoretic bounds such as ANEC and quantum inequalities. All central statements are attributed to prior literature without introducing new derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. No self-citation chains are load-bearing for any claimed result, and the semi-classical regime is treated as the standard effective-theory setting rather than a derived conclusion. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard background assumptions of general relativity and quantum field theory in curved spacetime rather than introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Classical energy conditions (null, weak, strong, dominant) hold in general relativity and imply geodesic incompleteness via the Hawking-Penrose theorems.
    Invoked in the opening review of classical implications for gravitational solutions.
  • domain assumption Quantum fields in curved spacetime can produce negative energy densities that violate pointwise energy conditions.
    Stated as the starting point for the quantum section of the lectures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5630 in / 1230 out tokens · 34438 ms · 2026-05-20T08:46:36.215270+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Physics and reality,

    A. Einstein, “Physics and reality,”Journal of the Franklin Institute221no. 3, (1936) 349–382

    work page 1936

  2. [2]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 14(1965) 57–59

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    The Occurrence of singularities in cosmology,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Occurrence of singularities in cosmology,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.A294(1966) 511–521

    work page 1966

  4. [4]

    Kontou and K

    E.-A. Kontou and K. Sanders, “Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory,”Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 19, (2020) 193001, arXiv:2003.01815 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Null energy conditions in quantum field theory

    C. J. Fewster and T. A. Roman, “Null energy conditions in quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 044003,arXiv:gr-qc/0209036. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 80, 069903 (2009)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Energy Conditions and Quantum Information,

    N. Iizuka, A. Ishibashi, K. Maeda, H. Nakayama, and T. Nishioka, “Energy Conditions and Quantum Information,”arXiv:2509.01286 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    R. P. Feynman,Feynman lectures on gravitation. 1996

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    Non-minimal coupling, negative null energy, and effective field theory,

    J. R. Fliss, B. Freivogel, E.-A. Kontou, and D. P. Santos, “Non-minimal coupling, negative null energy, and effective field theory,”arXiv:2309.10848 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology,

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, “The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314(1970) 529–548

    work page 1970

  11. [11]

    Indirect Evidence for Quantum Gravity,

    D. N. Page and C. D. Geilker, “Indirect Evidence for Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 979–982

    work page 1981

  12. [12]

    Quantum inequality restrictions on negative energy densities in curved space-times,

    M. J. Pfenning, “Quantum inequality restrictions on negative energy densities in curved space-times,” other thesis, 4, 1998

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Nonpositivity of energy density in Quantized field theories,

    H. Epstein, V. Glaser, and A. Jaffe, “Nonpositivity of energy density in Quantized field theories,”Nuovo Cim.36(1965) 1016. 48

    work page 1965

  14. [14]

    Bemerkungen zur unit¨ ar¨ aquivalenz von lorentzinvarianten feldern,

    H. Reeh and S. Schlieder, “Bemerkungen zur unit¨ ar¨ aquivalenz von lorentzinvarianten feldern,”Nuovo Cim.22no. 5, (1961) 1051–1068

    work page 1961

  15. [15]

    Some comments on energy inequalities

    E. Witten, “Some comments on energy inequalities.” Talk at ias online workshop on qubits and black holes, 2020.www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Oh-Kmy-mx0. Recording available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Oh-Kmy-mx0

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Bounds on negative energy densities in flat spacetime

    C. J. Fewster and S. P. Eveson, “Bounds on negative energy densities in flat space-time,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 084010,arXiv:gr-qc/9805024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    The Quantum Interest Conjecture

    L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, “The Quantum interest conjecture,”Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 104018,arXiv:gr-qc/9901074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    The double smeared null energy condition,

    J. R. Fliss, B. Freivogel, and E.-A. Kontou, “The double smeared null energy condition,”SciPost Phys.14no. 2, (2023) 024,arXiv:2111.05772 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, “Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,”JHEP07(2017) 066,arXiv:1610.05308 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang, “Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,”JHEP09(2016) 038,arXiv:1605.08072 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, “Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,”JHEP05(2008) 012,arXiv:0803.1467 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, “Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,”JHEP12(2023) 139,arXiv:2309.14409 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows,

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, “Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows,”JHEP01(2024) 102,arXiv:2310.15217 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Proof of the averaged null energy condition in a classical curved spacetime using a null-projected quantum inequality

    E.-A. Kontou and K. D. Olum, “Proof of the averaged null energy condition in a classical curved spacetime using a null-projected quantum inequality,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124009,arXiv:1507.00297 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Quantum inequalities in two dimensional Minkowski spacetime

    E. E. Flanagan, “Quantum inequalities in two-dimensional Minkowski space-time,” Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4922–4926,arXiv:gr-qc/9706006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  26. [26]

    Quantum Energy Inequalities in two-dimensional conformal field theory

    C. J. Fewster and S. Hollands, “Quantum energy inequalities in two-dimensional conformal field theory,”Rev. Math. Phys.17(2005) 577,arXiv:math-ph/0412028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    The Smeared Null Energy Condition,

    B. Freivogel and D. Krommydas, “The Smeared Null Energy Condition,”JHEP12 (2018) 067,arXiv:1807.03808 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Upper and Lower Bounds on the Integrated Null Energy in Gravity

    S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, “Upper and Lower Bounds on the Integrated Null Energy in Gravity,”JHEP01(2019) 133,arXiv:1808.09970 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Semi-local Bounds on Null Energy in QFT,

    J. R. Fliss and B. Freivogel, “Semi-local Bounds on Null Energy in QFT,”SciPost Phys.12no. 3, (2022) 084,arXiv:2108.06068 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Light Front Quantization

    M. Burkardt, “Light front quantization,”Adv. Nucl. Phys.23(1996) 1–74, arXiv:hep-ph/9505259. 49

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  31. [31]

    A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices

    A. C. Wall, “A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 104049,arXiv:1105.3445 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 069904 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Quantum Energy Inequalities for the Non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field

    C. J. Fewster and L. W. Osterbrink, “Quantum Energy Inequalities for the Non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field,”J. Phys. A41(2008) 025402, arXiv:0708.2450 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    How negative can null energy be in large N CFTs?,

    J. R. Fliss, B. Freivogel, E.-A. Kontou, and D. P. Santos, “How negative can null energy be in large N CFTs?,”arXiv:2412.10618 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Topological Censorship

    J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich, and D. M. Witt, “Topological censorship,”Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 1486–1489,arXiv:gr-qc/9305017. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 75, 1872 (1995)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  35. [35]

    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,

    E. Witten, “Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,”Rev. Mod. Phys.92no. 4, (2020) 045004,arXiv:1901.03928 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    O’neill,Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity, vol

    B. O’neill,Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity, vol. 103. Academic press, 1983

    work page 1983

  37. [37]

    A singularity theorem for Einstein-Klein-Gordon theory

    P. J. Brown, C. J. Fewster, and E.-A. Kontou, “A singularity theorem for Einstein–Klein–Gordon theory,”Gen. Rel. Grav.50no. 10, (2018) 121, arXiv:1803.11094 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    A new derivation of singularity theorems with weakened energy hypotheses,

    C. J. Fewster and E.-A. Kontou, “A new derivation of singularity theorems with weakened energy hypotheses,”Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 6, (2020) 065010, arXiv:1907.13604 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    A semiclassical singularity theorem,

    C. J. Fewster and E.-A. Kontou, “A semiclassical singularity theorem,”Class. Quant. Grav.39no. 7, (2022) 075028,arXiv:2108.12668 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    The Return of the Singularities: Applications of the Smeared Null Energy Condition,

    B. Freivogel, E.-A. Kontou, and D. Krommydas, “The Return of the Singularities: Applications of the Smeared Null Energy Condition,”SciPost Phys.13no. 1, (2022) 001,arXiv:2012.11569 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, “On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,”J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 303–321

    work page 1976

  42. [42]

    Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers, “Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,”JHEP05(2011) 036,arXiv:1102.0440 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    A Quantum Focussing Conjecture

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall, “Quantum focusing conjecture,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 6, (2016) 064044,arXiv:1506.02669 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Energy is Entanglement

    S. Leichenauer, A. Levine, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Energy density from second shape variations of the von Neumann entropy,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 8, (2018) 086013,arXiv:1802.02584 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Entropy Variations and Light Ray Operators from Replica Defects

    S. Balakrishnan, V. Chandrasekaran, T. Faulkner, A. Levine, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Entropy variations and light ray operators from replica defects,”JHEP09(2022) 217,arXiv:1906.08274 [hep-th]. 50

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall, “Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 2, (2016) 024017, arXiv:1509.02542 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,

    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z. U. Khandker, and H. Wang, “A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,”JHEP09(2019) 020,arXiv:1706.09432 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories

    T. Faulkner, F. M. Haehl, E. Hijano, O. Parrikar, C. Rabideau, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories,”JHEP08(2017) 057,arXiv:1705.03026 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,”Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3292–3300

    work page 1974

  50. [50]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,”Nature248(1974) 30–31

    work page 1974

  51. [51]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,”Commun. Math. Phys.43 (1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  52. [52]

    Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,

    W. Israel, “Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,”Phys. Rev.164(1967) 1776–1779

    work page 1967

  53. [53]

    Event horizons in static electrovac space-times,

    W. Israel, “Event horizons in static electrovac space-times,”Commun. Math. Phys. 8(1968) 245–260

    work page 1968

  54. [54]

    Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,

    B. Carter, “Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,”Phys. Rev. Lett.26(1971) 331–333

    work page 1971

  55. [55]

    Black holes in general relativity,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in general relativity,”Commun. Math. Phys.25 (1972) 152–166

    work page 1972

  56. [56]

    Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum, “Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2700–2711,arXiv:hep-th/9401070

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  57. [57]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,”Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [58]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,”Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602,arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Horizon entropy,

    T. Jacobson and R. Parentani, “Horizon entropy,”Found. Phys.33(2003) 323–348, arXiv:gr-qc/0302099

    work page arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law

    A. C. Wall, “Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 024038,arXiv:0910.5751 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [61]

    Restricted quantum focusing,

    A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Restricted quantum focusing,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 6, (2024) 066023,arXiv:2212.03881 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    A Covariant Entropy Conjecture

    R. Bousso, “A Covariant entropy conjecture,”JHEP07(1999) 004, arXiv:hep-th/9905177. 51

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality Beyond the Classical Regime

    C. Akers, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer, and A. Levine, “Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality Beyond the Classical Regime,”arXiv:1610.08968 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix

    B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,”Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 155009, arXiv:1204.1330 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    A. C. Wall, “Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,”Class. Quant. Grav.31no. 22, (2014) 225007,arXiv:1211.3494 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,”JHEP01(2015) 073, arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    The Generalized Second Law implies a Quantum Singularity Theorem

    A. C. Wall, “The Generalized Second Law implies a Quantum Singularity Theorem,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 165003,arXiv:1010.5513 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 199501 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    String Cosmology: The Pre-Big Bang Scenario

    G. Veneziano, “String cosmology: The Pre - big bang scenario,” in71st Les Houches Summer School: The Primordial Universe, pp. 581–628. 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0002094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    The Ekpyrotic Universe: Colliding Branes and the Origin of the Hot Big Bang

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,”Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 123522,arXiv:hep-th/0103239

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  70. [70]

    Born Again Universe

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran, “Born again universe,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 4, (2018) 044003,arXiv:1709.01999 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Robust Singularity Theorem,

    R. Bousso, “Robust Singularity Theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 1, (2025) 011501,arXiv:2501.17910 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    A Quantum Singularity Theorem for the Evaporating Black Hole

    N. Engelhardt and I. Nagar, “A Quantum Singularity Theorem for the Evaporating Black Hole,”arXiv:2605.05326 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,”JHEP11(2018) 102,arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,”JHEP01(2021) 128,arXiv:1905.01311 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    On the stress tensor light-ray operator algebra,

    A. Belin, D. M. Hofman, G. Mathys, and M. T. Walters, “On the stress tensor light-ray operator algebra,”JHEP05(2021) 033,arXiv:2011.13862 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra

    C. C´ ordova and S.-H. Shao, “Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 12, (2018) 125015,arXiv:1810.05706 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Curious QNEIs from QNEC: New Bounds on Null Energy in Quantum Field Theory

    J. R. Fliss and A. Rolph, “Curious QNEIs from QNEC: New Bounds on Null Energy in Quantum Field Theory,”arXiv:2510.26247 [hep-th]. 52

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv