pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19422 · v1 · pith:FUOUBZGJnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cs.NA· math.NA

Evaluation of External Magnetic Flux Density in Piezo-Flexomagnetic Nanobeams Using a Hybrid 1D-2D Finite Element Framework

Lala Samprit Ray , Bishweshwar Babu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.NAmath.NA
keywords piezo-flexomagneticnanobeamexternal magnetic flux densityhybrid finite elementTimoshenko beammagnetostatic formulationbending deformationnon-contact sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bending piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeams generates significant external magnetic flux in surrounding air even without piezomagnetic coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a hybrid finite element approach to compute the magnetic field produced outside a bending nanobeam made from piezo-flexomagnetic material. Prior studies largely ignored the surrounding air region, yet the calculations show that free-standing beams create a substantial external flux distribution. The model joins a one-dimensional Timoshenko description of beam bending to a two-dimensional magnetostatic treatment that covers both the solid and the air. Parameter sweeps identify which material constants exert the strongest effect on the external transverse field. The work points toward improved design rules for nanoscale sensors that detect magnetic signals without direct contact.

Core claim

The central claim is that free-standing piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeams produce a significant external magnetic flux density in the air domain when subjected to bending, and that this external field appears even in the complete absence of piezomagnetic coupling. The demonstration rests on a coupled hybrid finite-element formulation that merges a 1D Timoshenko beam model with a 2D magnetostatic problem defined over both the beam interior and the surrounding air region. Numerical results are checked against analytical solutions for magnetically isolated beams, and a systematic sensitivity study isolates the material parameters that most strongly control the external transverse flux.

What carries the argument

A coupled hybrid finite element formulation that combines a 1D Timoshenko beam model for mechanical deformation with a 2D magnetostatic formulation spanning both the nanobeam and the surrounding air domain.

If this is right

  • Significant external magnetic flux exists in free-standing structures even without piezomagnetic coupling.
  • Material parameters can be adjusted to modulate the strength of the external transverse magnetic flux density.
  • The hybrid framework supplies a practical tool for evaluating magnetic responses in non-contact magnetoelastic sensor designs.
  • External fields in the air domain become relevant for any free-standing piezo-flexomagnetic nanostructure under bending.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models that omit the external air domain may systematically understate the total magnetic response of such nanobeams.
  • Direct laboratory measurements of air-region flux around bent samples would provide an independent check on the numerical results.
  • The same hybrid modeling strategy could be applied to other flexomagnetic or multiferroic nanostructures where external fields drive sensing performance.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid 1D Timoshenko beam model together with the 2D magnetostatic equations in the beam and air accurately reproduces the physical generation and spatial distribution of external magnetic flux density.

What would settle it

Quantitative comparison of measured magnetic flux density values in the air immediately surrounding a bent piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeam against the numerical predictions from the hybrid model would confirm or contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19422 by Bishweshwar Babu, Lala Samprit Ray.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The 1D-2D coupled domain. The 1D neutral axis is embedded within the 2D beam body, which is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Beam with uniformly distributed transverse load. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Finite element mesh (shown at 1/10th refinement) highlighting the 2D beam domain enveloped by the 2D surrounding air domain. The 1D neutral axis is embedded along z = 0 within the beam body. For the finite element function spaces, continuous quadratic Lagrange elements P2 are selected for all primary kinematic variables (u, w, ϕ) on the 1D mesh and the scalar magnetic potential (ψ) on the 2D mesh. The choi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Magnetic scalar potential, magnetic field intensity, and magnetic flux density distributions for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Line plots showing interface conditions in simply-supported piezo-flexomagnetic beam. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Line plots showing interface conditions in simply-supported flexomagnetic beams. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tornado charts illustrating sensitivity of the transverse magnetic flux density component ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study numerically evaluates the external magnetic flux density generated in air by the bending of a piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeam. In several classes of non-contact sensors, the magnetic field induced in the surrounding medium is often more useful than the internal magnetic response. However, most theoretical studies on piezo-flexomagnetic nanostructures neglect the external magnetic domain. The proposed framework employs a coupled hybrid finite element formulation combining a 1D Timoshenko beam model with a 2D magnetostatic problem encompassing both the beam body and the surrounding air domain. The formulation is verified against analytical solutions of magnetically isolated piezo-flexomagnetic beams. The results demonstrate the presence of a significant external magnetic flux distribution in free-standing structures, even in the absence of piezomagnetic coupling. A systematic sensitivity analysis further identifies the material parameters most strongly influencing the external transverse magnetic flux density. These findings provide insight into the design of nanoscale non-contact magnetoelastic sensing systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a hybrid finite-element framework that couples a 1D Timoshenko beam model for the mechanical response of piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeams to a 2D magnetostatic formulation defined over both the beam interior and an exterior air domain. The formulation is verified against analytical solutions for magnetically isolated beams; numerical results are then presented for the external magnetic flux density, including the case of vanishing piezomagnetic coefficients, together with a parameter-sensitivity study.

Significance. If the external-field predictions are confirmed, the work supplies concrete evidence that free-standing piezo-flexomagnetic nanostructures can produce measurable magnetic flux in the surrounding medium even without piezomagnetic coupling, which is directly relevant to the design of non-contact magnetoelastic sensors. The hybrid 1D-2D discretization itself is a computationally attractive modeling choice that balances beam-theory efficiency with the need to resolve the air-domain magnetostatics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Verification section] Verification section: the reported comparisons are limited to analytical solutions for magnetically isolated beams (i.e., without the surrounding air domain). The headline claim—that a significant external B-field exists even when piezomagnetic coefficients are set to zero—rests entirely on the 2D magnetostatic solve over the beam-plus-air domain, yet no separate mesh-convergence study, domain-truncation test, or benchmark against a known external-field solution (e.g., equivalent surface-current or far-field dipole) is described for the air region.
  2. [Results section] Results section on external flux: the coupling between 1D beam strains and the 2D magnetic vector potential in the air domain is central to the reported transverse flux magnitudes. Without explicit documentation of far-field boundary conditions, air-domain size, or interpolation error between the 1D and 2D meshes, it is unclear whether the quoted flux values are robust or sensitive to these numerical choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state the air-domain extent and the type of far-field boundary condition employed.
  2. Notation for the magnetic vector potential should be introduced once and used consistently in both the 1D-2D coupling equations and the post-processing of external flux.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the verification and documentation of the hybrid formulation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Verification section] Verification section: the reported comparisons are limited to analytical solutions for magnetically isolated beams (i.e., without the surrounding air domain). The headline claim—that a significant external B-field exists even when piezomagnetic coefficients are set to zero—rests entirely on the 2D magnetostatic solve over the beam-plus-air domain, yet no separate mesh-convergence study, domain-truncation test, or benchmark against a known external-field solution (e.g., equivalent surface-current or far-field dipole) is described for the air region.

    Authors: We agree that the verification presented in the manuscript is restricted to analytical solutions for magnetically isolated beams, as described in the verification section. The external-field results are generated by the coupled 1D-2D magnetostatic formulation over the beam and air domain. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated mesh-convergence study for the air-domain discretization, a domain-truncation test demonstrating that the chosen exterior boundary is sufficiently distant, and a benchmark comparison against an equivalent far-field dipole approximation for the external magnetic flux. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section on external flux: the coupling between 1D beam strains and the 2D magnetic vector potential in the air domain is central to the reported transverse flux magnitudes. Without explicit documentation of far-field boundary conditions, air-domain size, or interpolation error between the 1D and 2D meshes, it is unclear whether the quoted flux values are robust or sensitive to these numerical choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript does not provide explicit documentation of the far-field boundary conditions, the precise air-domain extent, or the interpolation scheme used at the 1D–2D interface. The formulation employs Dirichlet conditions on a truncated exterior boundary chosen to minimize spurious reflections, with the domain size determined from preliminary convergence checks. The 1D beam strains are transferred to the 2D vector-potential problem via nodal interpolation at the beam surface. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection documenting these choices together with a brief sensitivity study confirming that the reported external flux magnitudes remain stable under moderate variations in domain size and mesh density. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical hybrid FE evaluation of external B-field is self-contained with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper implements a standard coupled 1D Timoshenko beam + 2D magnetostatic FE formulation to compute external magnetic flux density, including the case with piezomagnetic coefficients set to zero. It verifies the isolated-beam case against existing analytical solutions and then solves the extended air-domain problem numerically. No step equates a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or reduces the central result to a self-citation chain; the external-field magnitudes are direct outputs of the discretized Maxwell equations over the beam-plus-air domain. The derivation chain is therefore independent of the target quantities and receives a score of zero.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard continuum assumptions for beam theory and magnetostatics plus the existence of piezo-flexomagnetic coupling in the modeled material. No new entities are postulated. Material parameters are treated as inputs rather than fitted within this study. Only abstract available so full parameter list unknown.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Timoshenko beam theory is applicable to the nanobeam geometry and loading.
    Invoked for the 1D mechanical model component.
  • domain assumption Magnetostatic equations govern the magnetic field in both beam and air domains.
    Basis for the 2D magnetic problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1327 out tokens · 61305 ms · 2026-05-20T04:44:52.224401+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Andreescu, B

    R. Andreescu, B. Spellman, and E.P. Furlani. Analysis of a non-contact magnetoelastic torque transducer. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 320(12):1827–1833, June 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Garshelis and C.R

    I.J. Garshelis and C.R. Conto. A torque transducer utilizing two oppositely polarized rings.IEEE Trans- actions on Magnetics, 30(6):4629–4631, November 1994

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    M González, A Hernando, M

    E Pina, E Burgos, C Prados, J. M González, A Hernando, M. C Iglesias, J Poch, and C Franco. Magnetoe- lastic sensor as a probe for muscular activity: An in vivo experiment.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 91(1):99–102, June 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Calkins, Alison B

    Frederick T. Calkins, Alison B. Flatau, and Marcelo J. Dapino. Overview of Magnetostrictive Sensor Technology.Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 18(10):1057–1066, October 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    E. A. Eliseev. Complete symmetry analyses of the surface-induced piezomagnetic, piezoelectric and linear magnetoelectric effects.Ferroelectrics, 417(1):100–109–100–109, January 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    A. F. Kabychenkov and F. V. Lisovskii. Flexomagnetic and flexoantiferromagnetic effects in centrosym- metric antiferromagnetic materials.Technical Physics, 64(7):980–983–980–983, July 2019. 12

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Belyaev, Andrey V

    Boris A. Belyaev, Andrey V. Izotov, Platon N. Solovev, and Nikita M. Boev. Strain-gradient-induced unidirectional magnetic anisotropy in nanocrystalline thin permalloy films.physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters, 14(1), October 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Voyles, Michael S

    DongxueDu, SebastianManzo, ChenyuZhang, VivekSaraswat, KonradT.Genser, KarinM.Rabe, PaulM. Voyles, Michael S. Arnold, and Jason K. Kawasaki. Epitaxy, exfoliation, and strain-induced magnetism in rippled heusler membranes.Nature Communications, 12(1):2494–2494, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Intrinsic flexomagnetism of antiferromagnetic monolayer FeSe

    Ziming Tang, Qihua Gong, and Min Yi. Intrinsic flexomagnetism of antiferromagnetic monolayer FeSe. Physical Review B, 112(1):014432, July 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Large flexomagnetic response enabled by topological magnetic textures in monolayer CrN.Physical Review B, 111(9):094441, March 2025

    Qihua Gong, Ziming Tang, and Min Yi. Large flexomagnetic response enabled by topological magnetic textures in monolayer CrN.Physical Review B, 111(9):094441, March 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Sai Sidhardh and M. C. Ray. Flexomagnetic response of nanostructures.Journal of Applied Physics, 124(24):244101–244101, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    A cantilever beam analysis with flexomagnetic effect.Meccanica, 56(9):2281–2292, September 2021

    Jan Sladek, Vladimir Sladek, Mengkang Xu, and Qian Deng. A cantilever beam analysis with flexomagnetic effect.Meccanica, 56(9):2281–2292, September 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Nan Zhang, Shijie Zheng, and Dejin Chen. Size-dependent static bending, free vibration and buckling analysis of simply supported flexomagnetic nanoplates.Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 44(6):253–253, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan and Victor A. Eremeyev. On nonlinear bending study of a piezo-flexomagnetic nanobeam based on an analytical-numerical solution.Nanomaterials, 10(9), 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    On the Use of Nonlocal Strain Gradient Theory for Flexomag- netic Nanobeams

    Lala Samprit Ray and Bishweshwar Babu. On the Use of Nonlocal Strain Gradient Theory for Flexomag- netic Nanobeams. InVolume 3: Advances in Thermal Technologies; Advances in Semiconductor Manufac- turing; Clean Energy Technologies & Systems; Cyber Physical Systems + AI / ML, page V003T04A001, Hyderabad, India, September 2025. American Society of Mechanica...

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Lala Samprit Ray and Bishweshwar Babu. A unified higher-order shear deformable model for direct piezo- flexomagnetic nanobeams with strain gradient effect.Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, page 2609916, January 2026

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan, Tomasz Wiczenbach, and Victor A. Eremeyev. On thermal stability of piezo- flexomagnetic microbeams considering different temperature distributions.Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 33(4):1281–1297–, February 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Huang, Jan Sladek, Vladimir Sladek, Xian-Fang Li, Peter Schiavone, and P

    Ying Yang, W. Huang, Jan Sladek, Vladimir Sladek, Xian-Fang Li, Peter Schiavone, and P. H. Wen. Geometrically nonlinear behavior of a piezomagnetic nanobeam with flexomagnetic and surface effects by meshless finite block method.Applied Mathematical Modelling, 152:116580, April 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    BendingandfreevibrationofpiezomagneticTimoshenkobeamswiththeflexomagnetic and surface effects.Acta Mechanica, November 2024

    J.L.LiandX.F.Li. BendingandfreevibrationofpiezomagneticTimoshenkobeamswiththeflexomagnetic and surface effects.Acta Mechanica, November 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Size-dependent static bending, free vibration and buckling analysis of curved flexomagnetic nanobeams.Meccanica, 57(7):1505–1518, July 2022

    Nan Zhang, Shijie Zheng, and Dejin Chen. Size-dependent static bending, free vibration and buckling analysis of curved flexomagnetic nanobeams.Meccanica, 57(7):1505–1518, July 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan and Victor A. Eremeyev. The effect of shear deformations’ rotary inertia on the vi- brating response of multi-physic composite beam-like actuators.Composite Structures, 297:115951–115951, October 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan, Tomasz Wiczenbach, and Victor A. Eremeyev. Thermal buckling of functionally graded piezomagnetic micro- and nanobeams presenting the flexomagnetic effect.Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 34(4):1051–1066–1051–1066, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Effect of axial porosities on flexomagnetic response of in-plane compressed piezomagnetic nanobeams.Symmetry, 12(12):1935–1935, November 2020

    Mohammad Malikan, Victor Eremeyev, and Krzysztof Żur. Effect of axial porosities on flexomagnetic response of in-plane compressed piezomagnetic nanobeams.Symmetry, 12(12):1935–1935, November 2020

    work page 1935

  24. [24]

    Flexoelectric and flexomagnetic effects on bending and vibration of nano-laminates with surface effects.Smart Materials and Structures, 35(1):015018, January 2026

    Junhua Xiao, Zuwei Zhang, and Xiaodong Xia. Flexoelectric and flexomagnetic effects on bending and vibration of nano-laminates with surface effects.Smart Materials and Structures, 35(1):015018, January 2026. 13

    work page 2026

  25. [25]

    Chinh Van Minh, Thom Do Van, Phung Van Minh, Chi Tho Nguyen, Trac Luat Doan, and Huu Ha Nguyen. Investigation of mechanical responses of flexo-magnetic variable thickness nanoplates resting on elastic foundations, taking into account geometrical imperfections.Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 18(12):1951–1970, December 2024

    work page 1951

  26. [26]

    Size-dependent continuum-based model of a truncated flexoelectric/flexomagnetic functionally graded conical nano/microshells.Applied Physics A, 128(4), March 2022

    Sara Fattaheian Dehkordi and Yaghoub Tadi Beni. Size-dependent continuum-based model of a truncated flexoelectric/flexomagnetic functionally graded conical nano/microshells.Applied Physics A, 128(4), March 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Liang Liang Xu, Yu Fang Zheng, and Chang Ping Chen. Nonlinear statics of magneto-electro-elastic nanoplates considering flexomagnetoelectric effect based on nonlocal strain gradient theory.Thin-Walled Structures, 201:111974, August 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    A size-dependent study on buckling and post-buckling behavior of imperfect piezo-flexomagnetic nano-plate strips.Advances in Nano Research, 12:427–440, April 2022

    Hamed Momeni-Khabisi and Masoud Tahani. A size-dependent study on buckling and post-buckling behavior of imperfect piezo-flexomagnetic nano-plate strips.Advances in Nano Research, 12:427–440, April 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Hamed Momeni-Khabisi and Masoud Tahani. Buckling and post-buckling analysis of double-layer magneto- electric nano-plate strips considering piezo-flexoelectric and piezo-flexomagnetic effects.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 104:105218–105218, March 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan and Victor A. Eremeyev. Effect of surface on the flexomagnetic response of ferroic composite nanostructures; Nonlinear bending analysis.Composite Structures, 271:114179–114179, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Zuwei Zhang, Junhua Xiao, and Xiaodong Xia. Buckling and post-buckling of piezoelectric-piezomagnetic rectangular nanolaminates with flexoelectric and flexomagnetic effects.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 118:106127, July 2026

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Propagation of elastic waves in a flexomagnetic solid, 2026

    Swarnava Ghosh. Propagation of elastic waves in a flexomagnetic solid, 2026. Version Number: 1

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    The dispersion and reflection characteristics of coupled waves in the piezomagnetic solid with flexomagnetic microstructure effect.Acta Mechanica, 235(7):4101–4117, July 2024

    Fengyu Jiao, Zhongxian Liu, Jinghong Liu, and Mingyang Pan. The dispersion and reflection characteristics of coupled waves in the piezomagnetic solid with flexomagnetic microstructure effect.Acta Mechanica, 235(7):4101–4117, July 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Olha Hrytsyna, Jan Sladek, Vladimir Sladek, and Maryan Hrytsyna. Love waves propagation in layered waveguide structures including flexomagneticity/flexoelectricity and micro-inertia effects.Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 30(23):4933–4951–4933–4951, December 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Effects of magnetically highly and weakly conducting interfaces on flexomagnetic waveguide layered system.Mechanics Research Communications, 149:104534, October 2025

    Richa Kumari, Santosh Kapuria, and Santan Kumar. Effects of magnetically highly and weakly conducting interfaces on flexomagnetic waveguide layered system.Mechanics Research Communications, 149:104534, October 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Mahargha Biswas and Sanjeev A. Sahu. Multimodal frequency and phase velocity spectrum of shear wave in microstructural flexomagnetic plate loaded with complex fluid.Acta Mechanica, March 2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Mahargha Biswas and Sanjeev A. Sahu. Plane wave reflection in micro-structural piezomagnetic- flexomagnetic solid with impedance boundary conditions.Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 52(10):7283–7305, October 2024. _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2023.2297256

    work page doi:10.1080/15397734.2023.2297256 2024

  38. [38]

    Mahargha Biswas and Sanjeev A. Sahu. Response of surface effect on plane wave reflection at the bound- ary of flexomagnetic substrate.Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 31(29):11289–11308, November 2024. _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2303384

    work page doi:10.1080/15376494.2024.2303384 2024

  39. [39]

    Singh, and M.S

    Sayantan Guha, Vipin Gupta, Mahargha Biswas, A.K. Singh, and M.S. Barak. Complex wave interactions in graded piezomagnetic materials: a gravity and flexomagnetic perspective.International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 35(4):1459–1483, April 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan and Victor A. Eremeyev. On the geometrically nonlinear vibration of a piezo- flexomagnetic nanotube.Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, page mma.6758, July 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Nonlinear Bending Study of Size- Dependent Magneto-Electro-Elastic Laminated Nanobeams under Flexomagnetoelectric Effect.Mechanics of Solids, April 2025

    Yu-fang Zheng, Bo-wen Liu, Feng Wang, and Chang-ping Chen. Nonlinear Bending Study of Size- Dependent Magneto-Electro-Elastic Laminated Nanobeams under Flexomagnetoelectric Effect.Mechanics of Solids, April 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Eremeyev

    Mohammad Malikan and Victor A. Eremeyev. On dynamic modeling of piezomagnetic/flexomagnetic microstructures based on Lord–Shulman thermoelastic model.Archive of Applied Mechanics, 93(1):181– 196, January 2023. 14

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Eliseev, Anna N

    Eugene A. Eliseev, Anna N. Morozovska, Maya D. Glinchuk, and R. Blinc. Spontaneous flexoelec- tric/flexomagnetic effect in nanoferroics.Physical Review B, 79(16):165433–165433, April 2009

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    J. X. Zhang, R. J. Zeches, Q. He, Y.-H. Chu, and R. Ramesh. Nanoscale phase boundaries: a new twist to novel functionalities.Nanoscale, 4(20):6196–6204, September 2012

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Ünal, Sergio Valencia, Florian Kro- nast, Kyung-Tae Ko, Stefan Kowarik, Jan Seidel, and Chan-Ho Yang

    Jin Hong Lee, Kwang-Eun Kim, Byung-Kweon Jang, Ahmet A. Ünal, Sergio Valencia, Florian Kro- nast, Kyung-Tae Ko, Stefan Kowarik, Jan Seidel, and Chan-Ho Yang. Strain-gradient-induced magnetic anisotropy in straight-stripe mixed-phase bismuth ferrites: Insight into flexomagnetism.Physical Review B, 96(6):064402, August 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Gaikwad, R

    Hitesh Borkar, Vishwajit M. Gaikwad, R. J. Choudhary, M. Tomar, Vinay Gupta, and Ashok Kumar. Flexomagnetic effects on inhomogeneously strained multiferroics composites.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 553:169274–169274, July 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Pavlo Makushko, Tobias Kosub, Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Natascha Hedrich, Jiang Li, Alexej Pashkin, Stanislav Avdoshenko, René Hübner, Fabian Ganss, Daniel Wolf, Axel Lubk, Maciej Oskar Liedke, Maik Butterling, Andreas Wagner, Kai Wagner, Brendan J. Shields, Paul Lehmann, Igor Veremchuk, Jürgen Fassbender, Patrick Maletinsky, and Denys Makarov. Flexomagne...

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Mallek-Zouari, W

    I. Mallek-Zouari, W. Ben Taazayet, J.-M. Grenèche, L. Bessais, B. Dkhil, and N. Thabet Mliki. Field- induced spincycloidal modulationto antiferromagnetictransition and possible flexomagnetic effectin bifeo3 nanoparticles.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 934:167944–167944, February 2023

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Rabe, Paul M

    Zachary LaDuca, Tamalika Samanta, Nicholas Hagopian, Taehwan Jung, Katherine Su, Konrad Genser, Karin M. Rabe, Paul M. Voyles, Michael S. Arnold, and Jason K. Kawasaki. Cold Seeded Epitaxy and Flexomagnetism in GdAuGe Membranes Exfoliated From Graphene/Ge(111).Nano Letters, 24(33):10284– 10289, August 2024

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Lala Samprit Ray and Bishweshwar Babu. Effect of strain gradient on the direct flexomagnetic transduction behavior of nanobeams.Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 47(4):166, April 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Size-dependent static bending of flexomagnetic nanobeams

    Nan Zhang, Shijie Zheng, and Dejin Chen. Size-dependent static bending of flexomagnetic nanobeams. Journal of Applied Physics, 126(22):223901–223901, December 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Adam Sky, David Codony, Stephan Rudykh, Andreas Zilian, Stéphane P. A. Bordas, and Patrizio Neff. Cosserat micropolar and couple-stress elasticity models of flexomagnetism at finite deformations, November

    work page

  53. [53]

    arXiv:2511.22756 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  54. [54]

    A reformulation of constitutive relations in the strain gradient elasticity theory for isotropic materials.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 80:28–37, February 2016

    Shenjie Zhou, Anqing Li, and Binglei Wang. A reformulation of constitutive relations in the strain gradient elasticity theory for isotropic materials.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 80:28–37, February 2016

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Sai Sidhardh and Manas C. Ray. Exact solutions for elastic response in micro- and nano-beams considering strain gradient elasticity.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 24(4):895–918–895–918, March 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Griffiths.Introduction to electrodynamics

    David J. Griffiths.Introduction to electrodynamics. Pearson, Boston, fourth edition edition, 2013

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Ogden.Nonlinear Theory of Electroelastic and Magnetoelastic Interactions

    Luis Dorfmann and Ray W. Ogden.Nonlinear Theory of Electroelastic and Magnetoelastic Interactions. Springer, New York, 2014

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    F. Hecht. New development in FreeFem++.Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 20(3-4):251–265, 2012. 15

    work page 2012