pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19731 · v1 · pith:C67QUOQTnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Neutron stars more compact than black holes in quasi-topological gravity: Equilibrium configurations and radial stability

Liang Liang , Zhe Luo , Shoulong Li , Hongwei Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords neutron starsquasi-topological gravitycompactnessradial stabilityhigher-curvature gravityequations of state
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutron stars in quasi-topological gravity can exceed the black-hole compactness bound and gain radial stability from the theory's corrections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs neutron star models in quasi-topological gravity, a higher-curvature extension of general relativity. It demonstrates that at sufficiently high central densities the compactness surpasses the black-hole limit in a manner that becomes independent of the chosen equation of state. The same higher-order terms that produce this excess compactness also suppress radial instabilities that appear in general relativity. A reader would care because the result challenges the standard view that black holes represent the maximum possible compactness for any object and supplies concrete, testable configurations for strong-field gravity.

Core claim

Within general relativity, black holes are widely regarded as the ultimate benchmark for compactness in the Universe. In quasi-topological gravity, however, equilibrium neutron-star configurations can be constructed whose compactness exceeds the black-hole bound. In the high-central-density regime this excess compactness exhibits a universal behavior across several representative equations of state and values of the gravitational coupling. The quasi-topological corrections grow increasingly significant at large central densities and stabilize configurations that remain radially unstable in general relativity over a broad parameter range.

What carries the argument

The equilibrium structure equations and the radial perturbation equations derived from the quasi-topological gravity action, which modify the standard Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff and stellar oscillation equations through higher-curvature contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that quasi-topological gravity remains a consistent effective description of gravity at the extreme densities inside these neutron stars and that the chosen representative equations of state continue to apply without additional phase transitions or instabilities.

What would settle it

A high-precision mass-radius measurement that places a neutron star at compactness greater than one-half, or a survey that finds no such objects despite sensitivity to radii below the Schwarzschild limit, would directly test the predicted excess compactness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19731 by Hongwei Yu, Liang Liang, Shoulong Li, Zhe Luo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The solutions of metric functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Solutions for neutron stars (solid curves) and black holes (dashed curves) in both GR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The influence of QTG on the compactness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase diagram in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Weak and strong energy conditions for the neutron star ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Numerical solutions of the Lagrangian perturbations of pressure ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Within general relativity, black holes are widely regarded as the ultimate benchmark for compactness in the Universe. Recently, however, neutron star models have been constructed in a higher-curvature theory -- quasi-topological gravity (QTG) -- whose compactness can exceed the black-hole limit~\cite{LD19666}. Here we present a detailed analysis of both the equilibrium structure and radial stability of such configurations in QTG. By examining several representative equations of state and different values of the gravitational coupling constant, we find that in the high-central-density regime the compactness exceeding the black-hole bound exhibits a universal behavior in QTG. We further show that QTG corrections grow increasingly significant at large central densities and can stabilize configurations that are radially unstable in general relativity over a broad parameter range. These results establish ultra-compact neutron stars in QTG as theoretically viable strong-field configurations and provide a foundation for further investigations of their dynamical and phenomenological implications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes equilibrium configurations and radial stability of neutron stars in quasi-topological gravity (QTG) for several equations of state and values of the gravitational coupling constant. It reports that, in the high-central-density regime, the compactness can exceed the black-hole bound and exhibits universal behavior independent of the specific equation of state; QTG corrections become significant at large densities and stabilize configurations that are radially unstable in general relativity over a broad parameter range.

Significance. If the reported configurations remain within the regime of validity of QTG as an effective theory, the results would establish ultra-compact neutron stars as viable strong-field solutions in higher-curvature gravity and provide concrete examples of stabilization by higher-order terms. The claimed universality at high central density, if confirmed by explicit checks against post-hoc parameter choices, would strengthen the case for using such models to explore deviations from general relativity in compact-object astrophysics.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and §5] §4 (high-central-density regime) and the stability analysis in §5: the central claim that compactness exceeds the black-hole bound and exhibits universal behavior requires that the local curvature scale (e.g., Kretschmann invariant at the stellar center) remains below the inverse-square of the QTG coupling constant throughout the reported configurations. No explicit cutoff check or comparison of curvature invariants to the coupling scale is provided, so it is unclear whether the reported equilibrium and stability results lie inside the effective-theory regime.
  2. [Table 2 and Figure 5] Table 2 and Figure 5 (radial stability results): the statement that QTG stabilizes configurations unstable in GR is load-bearing for the second main claim, yet the paper supplies no quantitative error estimates on the eigenfrequencies or explicit verification that the stabilization persists when the equation of state is varied within its observational uncertainties.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite LD19666 but do not clarify how the present numerical methods differ from or improve upon that earlier work; a brief comparison paragraph would help readers assess novelty.
  2. [Eq. (3)] Notation for the QTG coupling constant is introduced without an explicit definition of its dimensionful scale in the first appearance (Eq. (3)); adding the dimensionful factor explicitly would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and §5] §4 (high-central-density regime) and the stability analysis in §5: the central claim that compactness exceeds the black-hole bound and exhibits universal behavior requires that the local curvature scale (e.g., Kretschmann invariant at the stellar center) remains below the inverse-square of the QTG coupling constant throughout the reported configurations. No explicit cutoff check or comparison of curvature invariants to the coupling scale is provided, so it is unclear whether the reported equilibrium and stability results lie inside the effective-theory regime.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check against the effective-theory cutoff is necessary to support the validity of the reported configurations. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in §4 that computes the Kretschmann invariant at the stellar center for every equilibrium sequence and compares it directly to the inverse-square of the QTG coupling constant. For all parameter values and central densities shown in the paper the local curvature remains at least an order of magnitude below the cutoff scale, confirming that the solutions lie inside the regime of validity of QTG as an effective theory. The same check has been repeated for the radially perturbed configurations discussed in §5. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2 and Figure 5] Table 2 and Figure 5 (radial stability results): the statement that QTG stabilizes configurations unstable in GR is load-bearing for the second main claim, yet the paper supplies no quantitative error estimates on the eigenfrequencies or explicit verification that the stabilization persists when the equation of state is varied within its observational uncertainties.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative robustness checks strengthen the stabilization claim. In the revised version we have augmented Table 2 with error bars on the eigenfrequencies obtained by propagating the observational uncertainties in the EOS parameters (nuclear saturation density, symmetry energy slope, and high-density stiffness) through the perturbation equations. We have also added a new panel to Figure 5 that overlays results for two additional EOS families (one soft and one stiff) lying within current observational bounds; the sign change in the fundamental eigenfrequency that signals stabilization remains present across all these models. These additions are discussed in the text of §5. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical results on compactness and stability are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper solves the equilibrium and radial perturbation equations in quasi-topological gravity for multiple equations of state and coupling values, then reports an observed universal compactness trend and stabilization effect at high central densities. These are numerical outcomes, not quantities defined by construction from the coupling constant or prior fits. The cited result on exceeding the black-hole bound is used as motivation rather than a load-bearing self-citation that forces the present conclusions. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggled steps appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of quasi-topological gravity as an effective theory and on the applicability of standard equations of state at the densities considered.

free parameters (1)
  • gravitational coupling constant
    Multiple values are examined; the reported stabilization occurs over a broad range of this parameter.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasi-topological gravity provides a consistent higher-curvature extension of general relativity suitable for neutron-star interiors.
    The entire equilibrium and stability analysis is performed inside this theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1227 out tokens · 38943 ms · 2026-05-20T04:16:00.662724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

    C. M. Will, “The confrontation between general relativity and experiment,” Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4 (2014) [arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi and T. Baker,et al.“Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015) [arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    L. Barack, V. Cardoso, S. Nissanke, T. P. Sotiriou, A. Askar, C. Belczynski, G. Bertone, E. Bon, D. Blas and R. Brito,et al.“Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, no.14, 143001 (2019) [arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Gravity experiments with radio pulsars,

    P. C. C. Freire and N. Wex, “Gravity experiments with radio pulsars,” Living Rev. Rel.27, no.1, 5 (2024) [arXiv:2407.16540 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum

    D. Psaltis, “Probes and tests of strong-field gravity with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum,” Living Rev. Rel.11, 9 (2008) [arXiv:0806.1531 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope re- 40 sults. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D16, 953- 969 (1977)

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives,

    K. S. Stelle, “Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives,” Gen. Rel. Grav.9, 353-371 (1978)

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections

    J. F. Donoghue, “General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum correc- tions,” Phys. Rev. D50, 3874-3888 (1994) [arXiv:gr-qc/9405057 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    Strings in Background Fields,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., E. J. Martinec, M. J. Perry and D. Friedan, “Strings in Background Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B262, 593-609 (1985)

    work page 1985

  12. [12]

    A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99-102 (1980)

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    Gravitation,

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, “Gravitation,” (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

    work page 1973

  14. [14]

    A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics,

    E. Poisson, “A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics,” Cambridge University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57-59 (1965)

    work page 1965

  16. [16]

    Neutron stars more compact than black holes as a probe of strong-field gravity,

    S. Li, H. L¨ u, Y. Gao, R. Xu, L. Shao, and H. Yu, “Neutron stars more compact than black holes as a probe of strong-field gravity,” submitted, Manuscript ID: LD19666

    work page

  17. [17]

    Quasi-Topological Ricci Polynomial Gravities

    Y. Z. Li, H. S. Liu and H. L¨ u, “Quasi-topological Ricci polynomial gravities,” JHEP02, 166 (2018) [arXiv:1708.07198 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Generalized quasi-topological gravity

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak and R. B. Mann, “Generalized quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.10, 104042 (2017) [arXiv:1703.01631 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity

    H. L¨ u, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope and K. S. Stelle, “Black holes in higher derivative gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, no.17, 171601 (2015) [arXiv:1502.01028 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics, and general relativity,

    N. K. Glendenning, “Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics, and general relativity,”

    work page

  21. [21]

    Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges,

    G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia and A. Wojnar, “Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges,” Phys. Rept.876, 1-75 (2020) [arXiv:1912.05202 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, “A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure,” Astron. Astrophys.380, 151 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0111092 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    Analytical representations of unified equations of state of neutron-star matter

    P. Haensel and A. Y. Potekhin, “Analytical representations of unified equations of state of 41 neutron-star matter,” Astron. Astrophys.428, 191-197 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0408324 [astro- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    I-Love-Q

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “I-Love-Q,” Science341, 365-368 (2013) [arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astrophysics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to As- trophysics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics,” Phys. Rev. D88, no.2, 023009 (2013) [arXiv:1303.1528 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars,

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars,” Phys. Rept.681, 1-72 (2017) [arXiv:1608.02582 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Analytical representations of unified equations of state for neutron-star matter

    A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson and S. Goriely, “Analytical repre- sentations of unified equations of state for neutron-star matter,” Astron. Astrophys.560, A48 (2013) [arXiv:1310.0049 [astro-ph.SR]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brus- sels–Montreal functionals – I. Role of symmetry energy,

    J. M. Pearson, N. Chamel, A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, C. Ducoin, A. K. Dutta and S. Goriely, “Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brus- sels–Montreal functionals – I. Role of symmetry energy,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481, no.3, 2994-3026 (2018) [erratum: Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, no.1, 768 (2019)] [arXiv:1903....

    work page arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    The final phase of inspiral of strange quark star binaries

    D. Gondek-Rosinska and F. Limousin, “The final phase of inspiral of strange quark star binaries,” [arXiv:0801.4829 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory,

    C. D. Capano, I. Tews, S. M. Brown, B. Margalit, S. De, S. Kumar, D. A. Brown, B. Krishnan and S. Reddy, “Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory,” Nature Astron.4, no.6, 625-632 (2020) [arXiv:1908.10352 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    GW190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object,

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “GW190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object,” Astrophys. J. Lett.896, no.2, L44 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Observation of gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ compact object and a neutron star,

    A. G. Abacet al.[LIGO Scientific, Virgo,, KAGRA and VIRGO], “Observation of gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ compact object and a neutron star,” Astrophys. J. Lett.970, no.2, L34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin and P. Pani, “Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.17, 171101 (2016) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.8, 089902 (2016)] [arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Echoes of ECOs: gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela and P. Pani, “Gravitational-wave 42 signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.8, 084031 (2016) [arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Does the black hole shadow probe the event horizon geometry?

    P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro and M. J. Rodriguez, “Does the black hole shadow probe the event horizon geometry?,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.8, 084020 (2018) [arXiv:1802.02675 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Tests for the existence of horizons through gravitational wave echoes

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,” Nature Astron.1, no.9, 586-591 (2017) [arXiv:1709.01525 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22, no.1, 4 (2019) [arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    The Mass-Radius relation for Neutron Stars in $f(R)$ gravity

    S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, R. Farinelli and S. D. Odintsov, “Mass-radius relation for neutron stars in f(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.2, 023501 (2016) [arXiv:1509.04163 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Neutron stars in Gauss-Bonnet extended Starobinsky gravity,

    Z. Liu, Z. Li, L. Liang, S. Li and H. Yu, “Neutron stars in Gauss-Bonnet extended Starobinsky gravity,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.12, 124052 (2024) [arXiv:2410.14108 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Non-perturbative and self-consistent models of neutron stars in R-squared gravity

    S. S. Yazadjiev, D. D. Doneva, K. D. Kokkotas and K. V. Staykov, “Non-perturbative and self-consistent models of neutron stars in R-squared gravity,” JCAP06, 003 (2014) [arXiv:1402.4469 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    On Theories of Gravitation With Nonlinear Lagrangians,

    A. Jakubiec and J. Kijowski, “On Theories of Gravitation With Nonlinear Lagrangians,” Phys. Rev. D37, 1406-1409 (1988)

    work page 1988

  42. [42]

    Radial oscillations of neutron stars in Starobin- sky gravity and its Gauss-Bonnet extension,

    Z. Li, Z. X. Yu, Z. Luo, S. Li and H. Yu, “Radial oscillations of neutron stars in Starobin- sky gravity and its Gauss-Bonnet extension,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.4, 044019 (2025) [arXiv:2507.18916 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Dynamical instability of gaseous masses approaching the Schwarzschild limit in general relativity,

    S. Chandrasekhar, “Dynamical instability of gaseous masses approaching the Schwarzschild limit in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.12, 114-116 (1964)

    work page 1964

  44. [44]

    Radial oscillations of relativistic stars

    K. D. Kokkotas and J. Ruoff, “Radial oscillations of relativistic stars,” Astron. Astrophys. 366, 565 (2001) [arXiv:gr-qc/0011093 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Probing Strong-Field Scalar-Tensor Gravity with Gravitational Wave Asteroseismology

    H. Sotani and K. D. Kokkotas, “Probing strong-field scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational wave asteroseismology,” Phys. Rev. D70, 084026 (2004) [arXiv:gr-qc/0409066 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    Toroidal oscillations of slowly rotating relativistic star in tensor-vector-scalar theory

    H. Sotani, “Toroidal oscillations of slowly rotating relativistic star in tensor-vector-scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. D82, 124061 (2010) [arXiv:1012.2143 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Gravitational wave asteroseismology of neutron and strange stars in $R^2$ gravity

    K. V. Staykov, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev and K. D. Kokkotas, “Gravitational wave asteroseismology of neutron and strange stars in R 2 gravity,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.4, 043009 (2015) [arXiv:1503.04711 [gr-qc]]. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Black hole scalarization in Gauss-Bonnet extended Starobinsky gravity,

    H. S. Liu, H. L¨ u, Z. Y. Tang and B. Wang, “Black hole scalarization in Gauss-Bonnet extended Starobinsky gravity,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.8, 084043 (2021) [arXiv:2004.14395 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Quasi-topological gravities on general spherically symmetric metric,

    F. Chen, “Quasi-topological gravities on general spherically symmetric metric,” JHEP03, 055 (2023) [arXiv:2301.00235 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Ergosphere instability,

    J. L. Friedman, “Ergosphere instability,” Commun. Math. Phys.63, no.3, 243-255 (1978)

    work page 1978

  51. [51]

    On the ergoregion instability,

    N. Comins and B. F. Schutz, “On the ergoregion instability,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A364, 211-226 (1978)

    work page 1978

  52. [52]

    Ergoregion instability revisited - a new and general method for numerical analysis of stability,

    S. Yoshida and Y. Eriguchi, “Ergoregion instability revisited - a new and general method for numerical analysis of stability,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.282, 580 (1996)

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    The w-mode instability of ultracompact relativistic stars

    K. D. Kokkotas, J. Ruoff and N. Andersson, “The w-mode instability of ultracompact rela- tivistic stars,” Phys. Rev. D70, 043003 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0212429 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    Generic instability of rotating relativistic stars,

    J. L. Friedman, “Generic instability of rotating relativistic stars,” Commun. Math. Phys.62, no.3, 247-278 (1978)

    work page 1978

  55. [55]

    Ergoregion instability of ultra-compact astrophysical objects

    V. Cardoso, P. Pani, M. Cadoni and M. Cavaglia, “Ergoregion instability of ultracompact astrophysical objects,” Phys. Rev. D77, 124044 (2008) [arXiv:0709.0532 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    Superradiance -- the 2020 Edition

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Superradiance: Energy extraction, black-hole bombs and implications for astrophysics and particle physics,” Lect. Notes Phys.906, pp.1-237 (2015), ISBN 978-3-319-19000-6 [arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Exotic Compact Objects and How to Quench their Ergoregion Instability

    E. Maggio, P. Pani and V. Ferrari, “Exotic compact objects and how to quench their ergoregion instability,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.10, 104047 (2017) [arXiv:1703.03696 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Ergoregion instability of exotic compact objects: electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations and the role of absorption

    E. Maggio, V. Cardoso, S. R. Dolan and P. Pani, “Ergoregion instability of exotic compact objects: electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations and the role of absorption,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.6, 064007 (2019) [arXiv:1807.08840 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Slowly decaying waves on spherically symmetric spacetimes and ultracompact neu- tron stars,

    J. Keir, “Slowly decaying waves on spherically symmetric spacetimes and ultracompact neu- tron stars,” Class. Quant. Grav.33, no.13, 135009 (2016) [arXiv:1404.7036 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Light rings as observational evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects

    V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa and P. Pani, “Light rings as obser- vational evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.4, 044069 (2014) [arXiv:1406.5510 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Exotic compact objects and the fate of the light-ring instability,

    P. V. P. Cunha, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu and N. Sanchis-Gual, “Exotic compact objects and the fate of the light-ring instability,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, no.6, 061401 (2023) [arXiv:2207.13713 [gr-qc]]. 44

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo, “Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.8, 084014 (2017). [arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Probing Planckian corrections at the horizon scale with LISA binaries

    A. Maselli, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, T. Abdelsalhin, L. Gualtieri and V. Ferrari, “Probing Planck- ian corrections at the horizon scale with LISA binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.8, 081101 (2018). [arXiv:1703.10612 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun and C. K. Mishra, “Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, no.9, 091101 (2017). [arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA,

    K. G. Arunet al.[LISA], “New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA,” Living Rev. Rel.25, no.1, 4 (2022). [arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]]. 45

    work page arXiv 2022