Modified Painlev\'e systems with meromorphic solutions for polynomial Hamiltonians of all degrees

Marta Dell'Atti; Thomas Kecker

arxiv: 2605.21166 · v1 · pith:QVZMTJ3Jnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🌊 nlin.SI · math-ph· math.CA· math.MP

Modified Painlev\'e systems with meromorphic solutions for polynomial Hamiltonians of all degrees

Marta Dell'Atti , Thomas Kecker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 01:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.SI math-phmath.CAmath.MP

keywords Painlevé equationsHamiltonian systemsmeromorphic solutionsOkamoto spacesNewton polygonmodified Painlevé equationspolynomial Hamiltoniansnon-autonomous systems

0 comments

The pith

Polynomial Hamiltonians of degrees three, four, five and seven produce modified Painlevé systems whose solutions are all meromorphic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper classifies non-autonomous Hamiltonian systems polynomial in two dependent variables that possess exclusively meromorphic solutions in the complex plane. These systems connect to the classical Painlevé equations, becoming modified versions when fixed singularities appear. The authors compute Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions for Hamiltonians with general coefficients to derive the necessary differential constraints on those coefficients. Using the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian as a guide, they exhaustively locate every such system for polynomial degrees three, four, five and seven, while showing that none exist for degree six or any higher degree. The result is a list of twelve standard polynomial Hamiltonians, some of them new, that can serve as reference points for the Painlevé equivalence problem.

Core claim

Using the geometric approach by computing the Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions for Hamiltonian systems with general coefficient functions, differential constraints on these functions are obtained for the systems to have only meromorphic solutions. Guided by the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian function, all such systems with polynomial Hamiltonian of degree three, four, five, and seven are obtained up to affine equivalence in the dependent variables, while there are none for degree six or degree higher than seven. This produces a list of twelve standard polynomial Hamiltonians that can serve as reference for the Painlevé equivalence problem, including new examples such as quartic ones

What carries the argument

Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions for Hamiltonian systems with general coefficient functions, together with the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian, which together generate the differential constraints required for exclusively meromorphic solutions.

If this is right

All solutions of the identified systems are meromorphic functions throughout the complex plane.
In the absence of fixed singularities the systems coincide with known Painlevé equations; otherwise they produce modified versions.
The twelve standard Hamiltonians provide a complete reference list for checking equivalence to Painlevé-type equations.
New explicit forms include quartic Hamiltonians for Painlevé I and II, quartic forms for modified Painlevé III and V, a quintic for Painlevé IV, and both quintic and septic forms for a modified Painlevé VI.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The degree cutoff at seven may indicate a structural limit on the complexity of polynomial Hamiltonians that remain integrable in the meromorphic sense.
The same geometric constraint technique could be applied to other families of non-autonomous systems to test for meromorphic solution sets.
The new Hamiltonians in the list may furnish previously unavailable test cases for numerical or asymptotic studies of Painlevé-type equations.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric computation of Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions produces differential constraints that are necessary and sufficient to guarantee exclusively meromorphic solutions, and the Newton polygon method exhaustively identifies all relevant polynomial degrees without omissions.

What would settle it

Discovery of even one polynomial Hamiltonian of degree six or eight whose solutions are all meromorphic, or the inability to recover one of the twelve claimed systems when the same geometric procedure is applied to degrees three, four, five or seven.

read the original abstract

We review non-autonomous Hamiltonian systems, polynomial in two dependent variables, with the property that all of their solutions are meromorphic functions in the complex plane. These are related to known Hamiltonian systems with the Painlev\'e property, for which the solutions are single-valued outside a set of fixed singularities. Our systems are equivalent to them in the absence of fixed singularities, and give modified Painlev\'e equations otherwise. Using the geometric approach by computing the Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions for certain Hamiltonian systems with general coefficient functions, we obtain differential constraints on these functions for the systems to have only meromorphic solutions. Guided by the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian function, we obtain all such systems with polynomial Hamiltonian of degree three, four, five, and seven, up to affine equivalence in the dependent variables, while there are none for degree six or degree higher than seven. We thus obtain a list of 12 standard polynomial Hamiltonians that can serve as reference for the Painlev\'e equivalence problem. This list contains also some new Hamiltonians not previously written down, such as quartic Hamiltonians for Painlev\'e I and II, quartic Hamiltonians for the modified Painlev\'e III and V equations, a quintic Hamiltonian for Painlev\'e IV and quintic and septic Hamiltonians for a modified Painlev\'e VI equation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper assembles a reference list of 12 polynomial Hamiltonians that force meromorphic solutions in modified Painlevé systems, with some new quartic and quintic examples.

read the letter

The core output is a compiled list of 12 standard polynomial Hamiltonians, up to affine equivalence, that produce only meromorphic solutions. The authors cover degrees 3, 4, 5, and 7, report none for degree 6 or anything higher, and flag several new forms such as quartics tied to Painlevé I and II, quartics for modified III and V, a quintic for IV, and both quintic and septic versions for modified VI. They reach this by imposing differential constraints on coefficient functions via Okamoto spaces of initial conditions and then using Newton polygons to restrict the possible degrees. That gives a concrete catalog meant to help with the Painlevé equivalence problem. The geometric setup draws on prior literature but applies it to general coefficient functions, which is a reasonable extension. The resulting list organizes known and new cases in one place, which could save time for people working on Hamiltonian formulations of these equations. The main soft spot is that only the abstract is available, so the actual derivations, explicit coefficient lists, and checks for exhaustiveness cannot be examined directly. Without those steps it is difficult to confirm that the constraints are both necessary and sufficient or that the Newton polygon method has not missed any admissible polynomials. The circularity burden looks low because the new constraints and the list itself are derived independently rather than fitted to existing data. This paper is for researchers already working in integrable systems and Painlevé theory who need concrete Hamiltonian examples or a starting point for equivalence checks. A reader focused on classification results or on extending meromorphic-solution criteria would get direct value from the list. I would send it to peer review; the method is established in the subfield and the claim of a bounded set of degrees is worth checking in full detail even if revisions are needed for the explicit forms.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews non-autonomous Hamiltonian systems polynomial in two dependent variables whose solutions are all meromorphic in the complex plane. These are related to Painlevé systems but may include fixed singularities, yielding modified Painlevé equations. The authors compute Okamoto spaces of initial conditions for systems with general coefficient functions to derive differential constraints ensuring exclusively meromorphic solutions. Guided by the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian, they classify all such systems for polynomial degrees 3, 4, 5 and 7 (none for degree 6 or higher than 7), up to affine equivalence in the dependent variables, producing a list of 12 standard polynomial Hamiltonians. The list includes new examples such as quartic Hamiltonians for Painlevé I and II, quartic Hamiltonians for modified Painlevé III and V, a quintic Hamiltonian for Painlevé IV, and quintic and septic Hamiltonians for a modified Painlevé VI.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete reference list of 12 polynomial Hamiltonians for the Painlevé equivalence problem and introduces previously undocumented modified systems. The geometric use of Okamoto spaces to obtain necessary differential constraints, combined with the Newton polygon classification, is a systematic strength that could extend to other degrees or non-polynomial cases. Explicit credit is due for attempting an exhaustive enumeration across the stated degrees and for identifying new Hamiltonians that enlarge the set of known meromorphic examples.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the geometric computation of Okamoto spaces produces differential constraints that are necessary and sufficient for exclusively meromorphic solutions is load-bearing for the entire classification; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit form of these constraints and verify that they indeed exclude non-meromorphic solutions for the retained degrees.
[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the Newton polygon method exhaustively identifies all relevant cases and yields none for degree 6 or degrees >7 requires a concrete demonstration that no polynomial Hamiltonians of those degrees satisfy the constraints; without this step the completeness of the list of 12 cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

The phrase 'up to affine equivalence in the dependent variables' should be defined explicitly early in the text, including the precise transformations allowed, to make the classification unambiguous.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the key derivations and completeness arguments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the geometric computation of Okamoto spaces produces differential constraints that are necessary and sufficient for exclusively meromorphic solutions is load-bearing for the entire classification; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit form of these constraints and verify that they indeed exclude non-meromorphic solutions for the retained degrees.

Authors: We agree that the explicit differential constraints obtained from the Okamoto spaces are central to the classification and that their necessity and sufficiency should be clearly demonstrated. The manuscript derives these constraints by resolving indeterminacies in the space of initial conditions for Hamiltonians with general coefficient functions. In the revision we will add explicit expressions for the constraints corresponding to each of the 12 standard forms and include a verification step showing that, when the constraints hold, the only possible movable singularities are poles (by analyzing the resolved exceptional divisors and confirming no other branching or essential singularities arise). revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the Newton polygon method exhaustively identifies all relevant cases and yields none for degree 6 or degrees >7 requires a concrete demonstration that no polynomial Hamiltonians of those degrees satisfy the constraints; without this step the completeness of the list of 12 cannot be assessed.

Authors: The Newton polygon is used to enumerate all possible leading-term balances for a given total degree, after which the Okamoto-space conditions impose a closed system of differential equations on the coefficient functions. For degree 6 and all degrees greater than 7 this system is overdetermined and admits only the zero solution. We will include in the revised manuscript an explicit case-by-case analysis (or a compact proof sketch) demonstrating that no non-trivial polynomial solutions exist for these degrees, thereby confirming the exhaustiveness of the enumerated list. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies established methods to produce independent classification

full rationale

The abstract describes applying the geometric computation of Okamoto spaces of initial conditions to general coefficient functions, yielding differential constraints that are presented as necessary and sufficient for meromorphic solutions. These constraints then guide an exhaustive search via the Newton polygon method over polynomial Hamiltonians of degrees 3-7. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation; the output list of 12 Hamiltonians and the absence for degree 6 or >7 are generated outputs rather than inputs renamed. The work references prior literature on Painlevé property and Okamoto spaces as external foundations, not as an unverified internal chain. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The classification relies on standard domain assumptions from Painlevé theory and geometric methods in complex differential equations; no free parameters or new postulated entities appear in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Non-autonomous Hamiltonian systems polynomial in two dependent variables can be analyzed via Okamoto's spaces of initial conditions to obtain differential constraints ensuring only meromorphic solutions.
This is the central geometric approach described in the abstract.
domain assumption The Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian function can be used to exhaustively identify all polynomial degrees admitting systems with exclusively meromorphic solutions.
Invoked to obtain systems for degrees 3,4,5,7 and to conclude none exist for degree 6 or higher.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1708 out tokens · 90362 ms · 2026-05-21T01:19:55.584093+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using the geometric approach by computing the Okamoto’s spaces of initial conditions for certain Hamiltonian systems with general coefficient functions, we obtain differential constraints... Guided by the Newton polygon of the Hamiltonian function, we obtain all such systems with polynomial Hamiltonian of degree three, four, five, and seven
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We select those Hamiltonians whose Newton polygons have exactly one interior point, corresponding to the case of elliptic curves.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

Painlevé:Mémoire sur les équations différentielles dont l’intégrale générale est uniforme

P. Painlevé:Mémoire sur les équations différentielles dont l’intégrale générale est uniforme. Bull. Soc. Math. France 28, pp. 201–261 (1900).https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.633

work page doi:10.24033/bsmf.633 1900
[2]

Gambier:Sur les équations différentielles du second ordre et du premier degré dont l’intégrale générale est a points critiques fixes

B. Gambier:Sur les équations différentielles du second ordre et du premier degré dont l’intégrale générale est a points critiques fixes. Acta Math. 33, pp. 1–55 (1910).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393211

work page doi:10.1007/bf02393211 1910
[3]

Gromak, I

V. Gromak, I. Laine, S. Shimomura: Painlevé Differential Equations in the Complex Plane (De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2002).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198096

work page doi:10.1515/9783110198096 2002
[4]

Fokas, A

A. Fokas, A. Its, A. Kapaev, V. Novokshenov: Painleve Transcendents: The Riemann-Hilbert Approach. Mathematical surveys and monographs (American Mathematical Society, 2006).https://books.google. co.uk/books?id=BXRjXumx0qIC

work page 2006
[5]

Takano, K

K. Takano, K. Okamoto:The Proof of the Painlevé Property by Masuo Hukuhara. Funkcial. Ekvac. 40(2) (2001).https://doi.org/10.24546/0100501181

work page doi:10.24546/0100501181 2001
[6]

Hinkkanen, I

A. Hinkkanen, I. Laine:Solutions of the first and second Painlevé equations are meromorphic. J. Anal. Math. 79, pp. 345–377 (1999).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788247

work page doi:10.1007/bf02788247 1999
[7]

Steinmetz:On Painlevé’s equations I, II and IV

N. Steinmetz:On Painlevé’s equations I, II and IV. J. Anal. Math. 82, pp. 363–377 (2000).https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02791235

work page doi:10.1007/bf02791235 2000
[8]

J. Hu, M. Yan:An elementary and direct proof of the Painlevé property for the Painlevé equations I, II and IV. J. Anal. Math. 91, pp. 105–121 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788783

work page doi:10.1007/bf02788783 2003
[9]

Shimomura:Proofs of the Painlevé property for all Painlevé equations

S. Shimomura:Proofs of the Painlevé property for all Painlevé equations. Jpn. J. Math. 29(2), pp. 159–180 (2003).https://doi.org/10.4099/math1924.29.159

work page doi:10.4099/math1924.29.159 2003
[11]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations II

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations II. Jpn. J. Math. 13, pp. 47–76 (1987).https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:123787748

work page 1987
[12]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations III

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations III. Second and Fourth Painlevé EquationsPI I andP I V. Math. Ann. 275, pp. 221–256 (1986).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762370

work page doi:10.1007/bf01762370 1986
[13]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations IV

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations IV. Third Painlevé EquationPI I I. Funkcial. Ekvac. 30, pp. 305–332 (1987).https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/relay-station?mr=MR0927186

work page 1987
[14]

Ohyama, H

Y. Ohyama, H. Kawamuko, H. Sakai, K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations V, Third Painlevé Equations of Special TypePI I I(D(1) 7 )andP I I I(D(1) 8 ). J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 13, pp. 145–204 (2006). https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms130204.pdf

work page 2006
[15]

Okamoto:Sur les feuilletages associés aux équation du second ordre à points critiques fixes de P

K. Okamoto:Sur les feuilletages associés aux équation du second ordre à points critiques fixes de P. Painlevé Espaces des conditions initiales. Jpn. J. Math. 5, pp. 1–79 (1979).https://doi.org/10.4099/ MATH1924.5.1

work page 1979
[16]

Sakai:Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systems and Geometry of the Painlevé Equations

H. Sakai:Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systems and Geometry of the Painlevé Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 220(1), pp. 165–229 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200100446

work page doi:10.1007/s002200100446 2001
[17]

Kajiwara, M

K. Kajiwara, M. Noumi, Y. Yamada:Geometric aspects of Painlevé equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50(7), pp. 073001 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/50/7/073001 31

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/50/7/073001 2017
[18]

Dzhamay, G

A. Dzhamay, G. Filipuk, A. Ligęza, A. Stokes:Different Hamiltonians for differential Painlevé equations and their identification using a geometric approach. J. Differential Equations 399, pp. 281–334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.03.029

work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2024.03.029 2024
[19]

Dell’Atti, T

M. Dell’Atti, T. Kecker:Geometric approach for the identification of Hamiltonian systems of quasi-Painlevé type. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58(095202) (2025).https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/adb819

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adb819 2025
[20]

Dell’Atti, T

M. Dell’Atti, T. Kecker:Spaces of initial conditions for quartic Hamiltonian systems of Painlevé and quasi- Painlevé type. Nonlinearity 39(1), pp. 015007 (2026).https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ae3355

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ae3355 2026
[21]

Dell’Atti, G

M. Dell’Atti, G. Filpuk:Quadratic Bureau-Guillot systems with the first and second Painlevé transcendents in the coefficients. Part I: geometric approach and birational equivalence. Results in Math. 4(81) (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-026-02644-1

work page doi:10.1007/s00025-026-02644-1 2026
[22]

Clarkson:Open Problems for Painlevé Equations

P.A. Clarkson:Open Problems for Painlevé Equations. SIGMA 15(006), pp. 20 (2019).https://doi.org/ 10.3842SIGMA.2019.006

work page 2019
[23]

A.R. Its, A. Prokhorov:On some Hamiltonian properties of the isomonodromic tau functions. Rev. Math. Phys. 30, pp. 1840008 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X18400081

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x18400081 2018
[24]

Jimbo, T

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa:Monodromy perserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. II. Physica D 2(3), pp. 407–448 (1981).https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1016/0167-2789(81)90021-X

work page 1981
[25]

Ohyama, H

Y. Ohyama, H. Kawamuko, H. Sakai, K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painlevé equations, V. Third Painlevé equations of special typeP I I I(D7)andP I I I(D8). J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 13(2), pp. 145–204 (2006). https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms130204.pdf

work page 2006
[26]

Kimura, T

T. Kimura, T. Matuda:On systems of differential equations of order two with fixed Branch points. Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences 56(10), pp. 445–449 (1980).https: //doi.org/10.3792/pjaa.56.445

work page doi:10.3792/pjaa.56.445 1980
[27]

Kecker:Space of initial conditions for a cubic Hamiltonian system

T. Kecker:Space of initial conditions for a cubic Hamiltonian system. Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations 64(1), pp. 132–142 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2017.1423479

work page doi:10.1080/17476933.2017.1423479 2019
[28]

Filipuk:Hamiltonians of bi-degree(3,2), Newton polygons and Painlevé equations’

G. Filipuk:Hamiltonians of bi-degree(3,2), Newton polygons and Painlevé equations’. Preprint (2026). https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/177772 32

work page 2026

[1] [1]

Painlevé:Mémoire sur les équations différentielles dont l’intégrale générale est uniforme

P. Painlevé:Mémoire sur les équations différentielles dont l’intégrale générale est uniforme. Bull. Soc. Math. France 28, pp. 201–261 (1900).https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.633

work page doi:10.24033/bsmf.633 1900

[2] [2]

Gambier:Sur les équations différentielles du second ordre et du premier degré dont l’intégrale générale est a points critiques fixes

B. Gambier:Sur les équations différentielles du second ordre et du premier degré dont l’intégrale générale est a points critiques fixes. Acta Math. 33, pp. 1–55 (1910).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393211

work page doi:10.1007/bf02393211 1910

[3] [3]

Gromak, I

V. Gromak, I. Laine, S. Shimomura: Painlevé Differential Equations in the Complex Plane (De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2002).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198096

work page doi:10.1515/9783110198096 2002

[4] [4]

Fokas, A

A. Fokas, A. Its, A. Kapaev, V. Novokshenov: Painleve Transcendents: The Riemann-Hilbert Approach. Mathematical surveys and monographs (American Mathematical Society, 2006).https://books.google. co.uk/books?id=BXRjXumx0qIC

work page 2006

[5] [5]

Takano, K

K. Takano, K. Okamoto:The Proof of the Painlevé Property by Masuo Hukuhara. Funkcial. Ekvac. 40(2) (2001).https://doi.org/10.24546/0100501181

work page doi:10.24546/0100501181 2001

[6] [6]

Hinkkanen, I

A. Hinkkanen, I. Laine:Solutions of the first and second Painlevé equations are meromorphic. J. Anal. Math. 79, pp. 345–377 (1999).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788247

work page doi:10.1007/bf02788247 1999

[7] [7]

Steinmetz:On Painlevé’s equations I, II and IV

N. Steinmetz:On Painlevé’s equations I, II and IV. J. Anal. Math. 82, pp. 363–377 (2000).https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02791235

work page doi:10.1007/bf02791235 2000

[8] [8]

J. Hu, M. Yan:An elementary and direct proof of the Painlevé property for the Painlevé equations I, II and IV. J. Anal. Math. 91, pp. 105–121 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788783

work page doi:10.1007/bf02788783 2003

[9] [9]

Shimomura:Proofs of the Painlevé property for all Painlevé equations

S. Shimomura:Proofs of the Painlevé property for all Painlevé equations. Jpn. J. Math. 29(2), pp. 159–180 (2003).https://doi.org/10.4099/math1924.29.159

work page doi:10.4099/math1924.29.159 2003

[10] [11]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations II

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations II. Jpn. J. Math. 13, pp. 47–76 (1987).https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:123787748

work page 1987

[11] [12]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations III

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations III. Second and Fourth Painlevé EquationsPI I andP I V. Math. Ann. 275, pp. 221–256 (1986).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762370

work page doi:10.1007/bf01762370 1986

[12] [13]

Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations IV

K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations IV. Third Painlevé EquationPI I I. Funkcial. Ekvac. 30, pp. 305–332 (1987).https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/relay-station?mr=MR0927186

work page 1987

[13] [14]

Ohyama, H

Y. Ohyama, H. Kawamuko, H. Sakai, K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painleve equations V, Third Painlevé Equations of Special TypePI I I(D(1) 7 )andP I I I(D(1) 8 ). J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 13, pp. 145–204 (2006). https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms130204.pdf

work page 2006

[14] [15]

Okamoto:Sur les feuilletages associés aux équation du second ordre à points critiques fixes de P

K. Okamoto:Sur les feuilletages associés aux équation du second ordre à points critiques fixes de P. Painlevé Espaces des conditions initiales. Jpn. J. Math. 5, pp. 1–79 (1979).https://doi.org/10.4099/ MATH1924.5.1

work page 1979

[15] [16]

Sakai:Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systems and Geometry of the Painlevé Equations

H. Sakai:Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systems and Geometry of the Painlevé Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 220(1), pp. 165–229 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200100446

work page doi:10.1007/s002200100446 2001

[16] [17]

Kajiwara, M

K. Kajiwara, M. Noumi, Y. Yamada:Geometric aspects of Painlevé equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50(7), pp. 073001 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/50/7/073001 31

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/50/7/073001 2017

[17] [18]

Dzhamay, G

A. Dzhamay, G. Filipuk, A. Ligęza, A. Stokes:Different Hamiltonians for differential Painlevé equations and their identification using a geometric approach. J. Differential Equations 399, pp. 281–334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.03.029

work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2024.03.029 2024

[18] [19]

Dell’Atti, T

M. Dell’Atti, T. Kecker:Geometric approach for the identification of Hamiltonian systems of quasi-Painlevé type. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58(095202) (2025).https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/adb819

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adb819 2025

[19] [20]

Dell’Atti, T

M. Dell’Atti, T. Kecker:Spaces of initial conditions for quartic Hamiltonian systems of Painlevé and quasi- Painlevé type. Nonlinearity 39(1), pp. 015007 (2026).https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ae3355

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ae3355 2026

[20] [21]

Dell’Atti, G

M. Dell’Atti, G. Filpuk:Quadratic Bureau-Guillot systems with the first and second Painlevé transcendents in the coefficients. Part I: geometric approach and birational equivalence. Results in Math. 4(81) (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-026-02644-1

work page doi:10.1007/s00025-026-02644-1 2026

[21] [22]

Clarkson:Open Problems for Painlevé Equations

P.A. Clarkson:Open Problems for Painlevé Equations. SIGMA 15(006), pp. 20 (2019).https://doi.org/ 10.3842SIGMA.2019.006

work page 2019

[22] [23]

A.R. Its, A. Prokhorov:On some Hamiltonian properties of the isomonodromic tau functions. Rev. Math. Phys. 30, pp. 1840008 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X18400081

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x18400081 2018

[23] [24]

Jimbo, T

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa:Monodromy perserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. II. Physica D 2(3), pp. 407–448 (1981).https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1016/0167-2789(81)90021-X

work page 1981

[24] [25]

Ohyama, H

Y. Ohyama, H. Kawamuko, H. Sakai, K. Okamoto:Studies on the Painlevé equations, V. Third Painlevé equations of special typeP I I I(D7)andP I I I(D8). J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 13(2), pp. 145–204 (2006). https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms130204.pdf

work page 2006

[25] [26]

Kimura, T

T. Kimura, T. Matuda:On systems of differential equations of order two with fixed Branch points. Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences 56(10), pp. 445–449 (1980).https: //doi.org/10.3792/pjaa.56.445

work page doi:10.3792/pjaa.56.445 1980

[26] [27]

Kecker:Space of initial conditions for a cubic Hamiltonian system

T. Kecker:Space of initial conditions for a cubic Hamiltonian system. Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations 64(1), pp. 132–142 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2017.1423479

work page doi:10.1080/17476933.2017.1423479 2019

[27] [28]

Filipuk:Hamiltonians of bi-degree(3,2), Newton polygons and Painlevé equations’

G. Filipuk:Hamiltonians of bi-degree(3,2), Newton polygons and Painlevé equations’. Preprint (2026). https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/177772 32

work page 2026