pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23984 · v1 · pith:QLFAUQQRnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CV

Parameter Efficient Multi-Class Intelligent Scheduling for Multimodal Online Distributed Industrial Anomaly Detection

Heqiang Wang , Weihong Yang , Zheyuan Yang , Jia Zhou , Xiaoxiong Zhong , Fangming Liu , Weizhe Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 19:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords industrial anomaly detectionmultimodal datadistributed systemsonline learningparameter efficient fine-tuningscheduling algorithm
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scheduling algorithm and low-rank adaptation support efficient online distributed multimodal anomaly detection in industry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a framework for detecting anomalies in industrial settings where data from multiple sensor types arrives continuously across distributed edge devices. It defines a scheduling problem to decide which anomaly class to train next, solved by a greedy method that weighs the benefit of additional data against how often each class gets updated. A parameter-efficient adaptation technique is introduced to lower the cost of training multiple classes. Tests on standard datasets indicate the method outperforms previous ones in both accuracy and resource use. If correct, this would allow real-time anomaly monitoring without moving all data to a central server.

Core claim

The MODIAD framework coordinates multi-class model updates in an online distributed setting through the Multi-class Intelligent Scheduling problem, which is solved by the Sequential Marginal Gain Greedy algorithm, and employs Resource Efficient Class-Wise Low Rank Adaptation to reduce overhead while maintaining detection performance on multimodal industrial data.

What carries the argument

The Sequential Marginal Gain Greedy algorithm that iteratively selects the class update offering the highest marginal gain to balance data sufficiency and update frequency under resource constraints, paired with class-wise low-rank adaptation for parameter reduction.

If this is right

  • Distributed edge devices can perform collaborative training on streaming data.
  • Multiple anomaly classes receive updates without one class monopolizing resources.
  • Computational and communication costs decrease significantly compared to full model training.
  • Superior detection performance is achieved under the online distributed scenario compared to centralized offline methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar scheduling could apply to other distributed learning tasks with multiple categories.
  • Further reductions in communication might be possible by combining with other compression techniques.
  • The approach assumes edge devices have enough local compute to run the adaptation; testing on very low-power devices would be a next step.

Load-bearing premise

The greedy algorithm can consistently choose class updates that keep data sufficient for all classes while respecting resource limits in real streaming conditions.

What would settle it

If experiments on continuous industrial data streams show that the detection performance degrades below baseline methods when resource constraints are tight, the effectiveness of the scheduling would be disproven.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23984 by Fangming Liu, Heqiang Wang, Jia Zhou, Weihong Yang, Weizhe Zhang, Xiaoxiong Zhong, Zheyuan Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multimodal Online Distributed Industrial Anomaly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization Localization Results (MVTec 3D-AD) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Class-Wise Temporal Performance Evolution (SMG) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Communication Cost with and without REC-LoRA . [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Industrial anomaly detection has attracted significant attention as a fundamental challenge in industrial systems. The rapid advancement of heterogeneous industrial sensors has driven industrial anomaly detection from unimodal to multimodal paradigms. However, existing methods are primarily designed for centralized and offline settings, overlooking the distributed and continuously generated data characteristic of real-world industrial environments. With the advancement of edge intelligence, modern edge devices are increasingly capable of not only data acquisition but also distributed model training, enabling collaborative intelligence across the system. Industrial anomaly detection represents a critical application in this context. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a novel framework termed Multimodal Online Distributed Industrial Anomaly Detection (MODIAD). We first present a comprehensive workflow for MODIAD and then formulate a Multi-class Intelligent Scheduling (MIS) problem to coordinate cross class model updates by balancing data sufficiency and class update frequency. To efficiently solve this problem, we design a Sequential Marginal Gain Greedy (SMG) algorithm that enables effective multi-class training under resource constraints. Furthermore, to improve the computational and communication efficiency during training, we propose an Resource Efficient Class-Wise Low Rank Adaptation (REC-LoRA) strategy, which significantly reduces system overhead while preserving detection performance. Extensive experiments on two representative multimodal industrial anomaly detection datasets, MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves superior performance and efficiency under the MODIAD scenario.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the MODIAD framework for multimodal online distributed industrial anomaly detection in edge settings. It formulates a Multi-class Intelligent Scheduling (MIS) problem to balance data sufficiency and class update frequency under resource constraints, solved via the Sequential Marginal Gain Greedy (SMG) algorithm, and introduces the Resource Efficient Class-Wise Low Rank Adaptation (REC-LoRA) strategy to reduce overhead. The central claim is that this combination yields superior performance and efficiency on the MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies datasets relative to prior methods.

Significance. If the performance and efficiency claims hold with proper validation, the work would address a practically relevant gap in moving anomaly detection from offline centralized settings to continuous multimodal streams on distributed edge devices. The MIS formulation and SMG scheduler provide a structured way to handle multi-class updates, while REC-LoRA targets parameter efficiency; together they target a realistic industrial scenario.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the approach 'achieves superior performance and efficiency' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, ablation results, or experimental protocol details. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reader's assessment correctly notes that soundness cannot be evaluated from the supplied information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the abstract below and agree that revisions are warranted to strengthen the presentation of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the approach 'achieves superior performance and efficiency' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, ablation results, or experimental protocol details. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reader's assessment correctly notes that soundness cannot be evaluated from the supplied information.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should provide concrete quantitative support for the central claims to enable readers to assess the contributions more readily. The full manuscript includes detailed experimental results on the MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies datasets, with comparisons to baselines, performance metrics, efficiency measurements, and descriptions of the evaluation protocol. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to incorporate key quantitative findings (e.g., detection performance gains and overhead reductions) while preserving the overall length and focus. This change directly addresses the concern without misrepresenting the experimental evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces the MODIAD framework, formulates the MIS scheduling problem, proposes the SMG algorithm to solve it under constraints, and introduces the REC-LoRA adaptation method. These are presented as novel constructions motivated by the distributed online setting. Performance is asserted via experiments on external datasets (MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies) rather than any closed mathematical derivation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce a claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The argument chain remains self-contained against the stated benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5802 in / 1030 out tokens · 36507 ms · 2026-06-30T19:34:39.283252+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,

    J. Liu, G. Xie, J. Wang, S. Li, C. Wang, F. Zheng, and Y . Jin, “Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,”Machine Intelligence Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 104–135, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,

    P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 9592–9600

    2019

  3. [3]

    A comprehensive survey for real-world industrial surface defect detec- tion: Challenges, approaches, and prospects,

    Y . Cheng, Y . Cao, H. Yao, W. Luo, C. Jiang, H. Zhang, and W. Shen, “A comprehensive survey for real-world industrial surface defect detec- tion: Challenges, approaches, and prospects,”Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 84, pp. 152–172, 2026

    2026

  4. [4]

    Multimodal industrial anomaly detection via hybrid fusion,

    Y . Wang, J. Peng, J. Zhang, R. Yi, Y . Wang, and C. Wang, “Multimodal industrial anomaly detection via hybrid fusion,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 8032–8041

    2023

  5. [5]

    Federated continual learning: Concepts, challenges, and solutions,

    P. Hamedi, R. Razavi-Far, and E. Hallaji, “Federated continual learning: Concepts, challenges, and solutions,”Neurocomputing, p. 130844, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    A survey on federated learning,

    C. Zhang, Y . Xie, H. Bai, B. Yu, W. Li, and Y . Gao, “A survey on federated learning,”Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 216, p. 106775, 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Client selection and bandwidth allocation in wireless federated learning networks: A long-term perspective,

    J. Xu and H. Wang, “Client selection and bandwidth allocation in wireless federated learning networks: A long-term perspective,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1188– 1200, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Federated learning with client selection and gradient compression in heterogeneous edge systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Jiang, H. Xu, Z. Wang, C. Qian, and C. Qiao, “Federated learning with client selection and gradient compression in heterogeneous edge systems,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5446–5461, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Multi-job intelligent scheduling with cross-device federated learning,

    J. Liu, J. Jia, B. Ma, C. Zhou, J. Zhou, Y . Zhou, H. Dai, and D. Dou, “Multi-job intelligent scheduling with cross-device federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 535–551, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Efficient device scheduling with multi-job federated learning,

    C. Zhou, J. Liu, J. Jia, J. Zhou, Y . Zhou, H. Dai, and D. Dou, “Efficient device scheduling with multi-job federated learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 9, 2022, pp. 9971–9979

    2022

  11. [11]

    The mvtec 3d-ad dataset for unsupervised 3d anomaly detection and localization,

    P. Bergmann, X. Jin, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “The mvtec 3d-ad dataset for unsupervised 3d anomaly detection and localization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09045, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Asymmetric student-teacher networks for industrial anomaly detection,

    M. Rudolph, T. Wehrbein, B. Rosenhahn, and B. Wandt, “Asymmetric student-teacher networks for industrial anomaly detection,” inProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2023, pp. 2592–2602

    2023

  13. [13]

    Rethinking reverse distillation for multi-modal anomaly detection,

    Z. Gu, J. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Chen, J. Peng, Z. Gan, G. Jiang, A. Shu, Y . Wang, and L. Ma, “Rethinking reverse distillation for multi-modal anomaly detection,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 8, 2024, pp. 8445–8453

    2024

  14. [14]

    Complementary pseudo multimodal feature for point cloud anomaly detection,

    Y . Cao, X. Xu, and W. Shen, “Complementary pseudo multimodal feature for point cloud anomaly detection,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 156, p. 110761, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Self-supervised feature adaptation for 3d industrial anomaly detection,

    Y . Tu, B. Zhang, L. Liu, Y . Li, J. Zhang, Y . Wang, C. Wang, and C. Zhao, “Self-supervised feature adaptation for 3d industrial anomaly detection,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 75– 91

    2024

  16. [16]

    Shape- guided dual-memory learning for 3d anomaly detection,

    Y .-M. Chu, L. Chieh, T.-I. Hsieh, H.-T. Chen, and T.-L. Liu, “Shape- guided dual-memory learning for 3d anomaly detection,” 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Easynet: An easy network for 3d industrial anomaly detection,

    R. Chen, G. Xie, J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Luo, J. Wang, and F. Zheng, “Easynet: An easy network for 3d industrial anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023, pp. 7038–7046

    2023

  18. [18]

    Mul- timodal industrial anomaly detection by crossmodal feature mapping,

    A. Costanzino, P. Z. Ramirez, G. Lisanti, and L. Di Stefano, “Mul- timodal industrial anomaly detection by crossmodal feature mapping,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 17 234–17 243

    2024

  19. [19]

    Online deep learning: learning deep neural networks on the fly,

    D. Sahoo, Q. Pham, J. Lu, and S. C. Hoi, “Online deep learning: learning deep neural networks on the fly,”Proceedings of the Twenty- Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI- 18), 2018

    2018

  20. [20]

    Communication-efficient randomized algorithm for multi-kernel online federated learning,

    S. Hong and J. Chae, “Communication-efficient randomized algorithm for multi-kernel online federated learning,”IEEE Transactions on Pat- tern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 9872–9886, 2021

    2021

  21. [21]

    Tighter regret analysis and optimization of online federated learning,

    D. Kwon, J. Park, and S. Hong, “Tighter regret analysis and optimization of online federated learning,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023

    2023

  22. [22]

    Online federated learning,

    A. Mitra, H. Hassani, and G. J. Pappas, “Online federated learning,” in 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4083–4090

    2021

  23. [23]

    Online vertical federated learning for cooperative spectrum sensing,

    H. Wang and J. Xu, “Online vertical federated learning for cooperative spectrum sensing,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Pravfed: Practical heterogeneous vertical federated learning via representation learning,

    S. Wang, K. Gai, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, and L. Zhu, “Pravfed: Practical heterogeneous vertical federated learning via representation learning,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Denoising and adaptive online vertical federated learning for sequential multi-sensor data in industrial internet of things,

    H. Wang, X. Zhong, K. Liu, F. Liu, and W. Zhang, “Denoising and adaptive online vertical federated learning for sequential multi-sensor data in industrial internet of things,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Multimodal online federated learning with modality missing in internet of things,

    H. Wang, X. Liu, X. Zhong, L. Chen, F. Liu, and W. Zhang, “Multimodal online federated learning with modality missing in internet of things,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Mitigating modality quantity and quality imbalance in multimodal online federated learning,

    H. Wang, W. Yang, X. Zhong, J. Zhou, F. Liu, and W. Zhang, “Mitigating modality quantity and quality imbalance in multimodal online federated learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11159, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Communication and computation efficiency in federated learning: A survey,

    O. R. A. Almanifi, C.-O. Chow, M.-L. Tham, J. H. Chuah, and J. Kanesan, “Communication and computation efficiency in federated learning: A survey,”Internet of Things, vol. 22, p. 100742, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Federated learning for computationally constrained heterogeneous devices: A survey,

    K. Pfeiffer, M. Rapp, R. Khalili, and J. Henkel, “Federated learning for computationally constrained heterogeneous devices: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 14s, pp. 1–27, 2023. 14

    2023

  30. [30]

    Efficient fed- erated learning via joint communication and computation optimization,

    G. Wang, C. Zhao, Q. Qi, R. Han, L. Bai, and J. Choi, “Efficient fed- erated learning via joint communication and computation optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 11 580– 11 592, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Client selection in federated learning: Principles, challenges, and opportunities,

    L. Fu, H. Zhang, G. Gao, M. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Client selection in federated learning: Principles, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 21 811–21 819, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Multi-task federated learning for person- alised deep neural networks in edge computing,

    J. Mills, J. Hu, and G. Min, “Multi-task federated learning for person- alised deep neural networks in edge computing,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 630–641, 2021

    2021

  33. [33]

    Com- putation and communication efficient federated learning with adaptive model pruning,

    Z. Jiang, Y . Xu, H. Xu, Z. Wang, J. Liu, Q. Chen, and C. Qiao, “Com- putation and communication efficient federated learning with adaptive model pruning,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2003–2021, 2023

    2003

  34. [34]

    Aquila: Communication efficient federated learning with adaptive quan- tization in device selection strategy,

    Z. Zhao, Y . Mao, Z. Shi, Y . Liu, T. Lan, W. Ding, and X.-P. Zhang, “Aquila: Communication efficient federated learning with adaptive quan- tization in device selection strategy,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 7363–7376, 2023

    2023

  35. [35]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning in large language models: a survey of methodologies,

    L. Wang, S. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Pan, R. Cai, S. Yang, and F. Yang, “Parameter-efficient fine-tuning in large language models: a survey of methodologies,”Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 8, p. 227, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Adaptive parameter- efficient federated fine-tuning on heterogeneous devices,

    J. Liu, Y . Liao, H. Xu, Y . Xu, J. Liu, and C. Qian, “Adaptive parameter- efficient federated fine-tuning on heterogeneous devices,”IEEE Trans- actions on Mobile Computing, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    The eyecandies dataset for unsupervised multimodal anomaly detection and localization,

    L. Bonfiglioli, M. Toschi, D. Silvestri, N. Fioraio, and D. De Gregorio, “The eyecandies dataset for unsupervised multimodal anomaly detection and localization,” inProceedings of the 16th Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV2022, 2022, aCCV

    2022

  38. [38]

    A survey on vision transformer,

    K. Han, Y . Wang, H. Chen, X. Chen, J. Guo, Z. Liu, Y . Tang, A. Xiao, C. Xu, Y . Xuet al., “A survey on vision transformer,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 87–110, 2022

    2022

  39. [39]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 2009, pp. 248–255

    2009

  40. [40]

    Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers,

    M. Caron, H. Touvron, I. Misra, H. J ´egou, J. Mairal, P. Bojanowski, and A. Joulin, “Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 9650–9660

    2021

  41. [41]

    Point transformer,

    H. Zhao, L. Jiang, J. Jia, P. H. Torr, and V . Koltun, “Point transformer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 16 259–16 268

    2021

  42. [42]

    ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository

    A. X. Chang, T. Funkhouser, L. Guibas, P. Hanrahan, Q. Huang, Z. Li, S. Savarese, M. Savva, S. Song, H. Suet al., “Shapenet: An information- rich 3d model repository,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015