pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24081 · v1 · pith:XAJIDRX2new · submitted 2026-05-22 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Production of Leptophilic Bosons in Ultradegenerate Relativistic Matter

Damiano F. G. Fiorillo , Alessandro Lella , Georg G. Raffelt , Nudzeim Selimovic , Edoardo Vitagliano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 16:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsleptophilic bosonsbremsstrahlungultradegenerate mattercooling constraintsscalar particlesvector bosonspseudoscalars
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutron stars emit leptophilic scalars, vectors and pseudoscalars at rates whose temperature scalings allow coupling constraints from observed cooling ages.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the production rates of new scalar, vector and pseudoscalar bosons that couple predominantly to electrons and muons inside neutron stars. The focus is bremsstrahlung in lepton-lepton and lepton-proton collisions under ultradegenerate conditions. In-medium renormalization changes the effective couplings, especially for vectors, and the resulting energy-loss powers depend on whether protons are superconducting. These losses scale more slowly with temperature than standard neutrino emission and therefore become relevant at late cooling stages, when photon emission takes over. The derived rates therefore translate observed neutron-star ages and temperatures into limits on the new-particle couplings.

Core claim

In the ultradegenerate relativistic matter of neutron stars, bremsstrahlung emission rates for leptophilic bosons are calculated in the presence of in-medium effects. When protons are superconducting the scalar and vector energy-loss rates scale as T^4 and the pseudoscalar rate as T^6; when protons are normal the scalings become T^{11/3} and T^{17/3} because transverse-photon screening reduces the power by one third. These powers are slower than the T^8 of modified-Urca neutrino losses and can therefore be used to bound leptophilic couplings once late-time cooling data are compared with the calculated rates.

What carries the argument

Bremsstrahlung emission rates of leptophilic bosons in ultradegenerate lepton-proton matter, modified by in-medium renormalization of vector couplings and by proton superconductivity or photon screening.

If this is right

  • For superconducting protons the scalar and vector losses scale as T^4 while pseudoscalar losses scale as T^6.
  • For normal protons the corresponding scalings are reduced by one third to T^{11/3} and T^{17/3} because of transverse-photon screening.
  • These new channels become competitive with photon cooling at sufficiently low internal temperatures.
  • Observed neutron-star cooling ages therefore translate directly into upper limits on the leptophilic coupling strengths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same bremsstrahlung framework could be applied to other ultradegenerate lepton plasmas, such as those in white-dwarf interiors.
  • The strong in-medium modification of vector couplings suggests that analogous plasma corrections should be examined in terrestrial searches for light vector bosons.
  • If the predicted scalings are confirmed, neutron-star cooling data would become a precision probe for any new lepton-coupled degree of freedom lighter than roughly 100 keV.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume bremsstrahlung in electromagnetic lepton-lepton or lepton-proton collisions dominates in the ultradegenerate limit and that in-medium renormalization of vector couplings is correctly modeled.

What would settle it

A neutron star whose measured cooling curve at late times shows an energy-loss exponent clearly different from T^4 (superconducting case) or T^{11/3} (normal case) after standard neutrino and photon contributions are subtracted would falsify the applicability of the derived coupling bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24081 by Alessandro Lella, Damiano F. G. Fiorillo, Edoardo Vitagliano, Georg G. Raffelt, Nudzeim Selimovic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of bremsstrahlung emission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. In-medium boson coupling to leptons mediated by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutron stars (NSs) are powerful factories for new particles with masses up to the 100 keV range. These compact stars contain significant populations of charged particles, notably protons, electrons and muons. We calculate the emission rates for new scalar, vector, and pseudoscalar bosons that predominantly couple to electrons and muons. For vector bosons, the in-medium renormalization of the effective couplings strongly modifies the emission rates, e.g., purely muon-philic vectors are predominantly emitted by ultra-relativistic electrons. We focus on bremsstrahlung in electromagnetic lepton-lepton or lepton-proton collisions in the ultradegenerate limit. When protons are superconducting, the scalar and vector energy loss rates scale as $T^4$, the pseudoscalar one as $T^6$, to be compared with $T^8$ for neutrino losses by the modified Urca process. For normal-conducting protons, the screening of transverse photons implies instead scalings with a power reduced by $1/3$ and thus $T^{11/3}$ for scalars and vectors, and $T^{17/3}$ for pseudoscalars. As the NS cools, such new particle losses would become important at late times, when surface photon emission begins to take over, which itself scales roughly as $T^2$ in terms of the internal temperature. Our results can be used to constrain the leptophilic coupling strengths through observed NS cooling ages.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates emission rates of leptophilic scalar, vector, and pseudoscalar bosons (masses up to ~100 keV) in ultradegenerate neutron-star matter via bremsstrahlung in electromagnetic lepton-lepton and lepton-proton collisions. It derives temperature scalings for the energy-loss rates—T^4 (scalars/vectors) and T^6 (pseudoscalars) when protons are superconducting; T^{11/3} and T^{17/3} when normal-conducting due to transverse-photon screening—and argues that these rates become relevant at late times relative to photon (~T^2) and modified-Urca (~T^8) losses, enabling constraints on leptophilic couplings from observed NS cooling ages. In-medium renormalization of vector couplings is emphasized, including the claim that purely muon-philic vectors are emitted primarily by ultra-relativistic electrons.

Significance. If the rates and scalings hold, the work supplies concrete, observationally testable predictions that extend NS cooling as a probe of new physics into the leptophilic sector. The direct first-principles calculation in the ultradegenerate limit, with explicit power-law dependencies that differ from standard channels, is a strength and would allow quantitative bounds once the assumptions are verified. No free parameters are introduced and the results are framed as falsifiable via cooling-age data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3 (bremsstrahlung rate derivations)] The central claim that the computed rates can constrain leptophilic couplings via NS cooling ages rests on bremsstrahlung dominance in the ultradegenerate regime. The manuscript focuses exclusively on this channel (Abstract; §3) but provides no quantitative comparison showing that competing processes (e.g., Compton scattering, pair production, or plasmon decay) remain subdominant across the relevant temperature and density range; if they contribute at comparable levels the quoted T^4/T^{11/3} scalings would not apply.
  2. [§4.2 (in-medium vector renormalization)] §4.2 (vector-boson rates): The statement that purely muon-philic vectors are predominantly emitted by ultra-relativistic electrons due to in-medium renormalization of the effective coupling is load-bearing for the vector results. No explicit derivation of the renormalization procedure, error estimate, or sensitivity check against alternative plasma-screening models is supplied; an incorrect treatment would alter both the overall normalization and the temperature dependence used for constraints.
  3. [§5 (normal-conducting protons; transverse screening)] §5 (normal-conducting proton case): The reduction of the power by 1/3 (yielding T^{11/3} and T^{17/3}) is attributed to transverse-photon screening, yet the manuscript does not derive or reference the specific screening length or dispersion relation employed. Without this step or a check that the approximation remains valid down to the temperatures where new-particle losses would dominate, the modified scalings cannot be used for quantitative constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. [§2 (setup and notation)] Notation for the effective in-medium couplings (e.g., distinction between vacuum and renormalized g_{e,μ}) is introduced without a dedicated table or equation summarizing the relations; a short appendix collecting these definitions would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below with honest assessments of the manuscript's current content and planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; §3] The central claim rests on bremsstrahlung dominance, but no quantitative comparison shows competing processes (Compton scattering, pair production, or plasmon decay) remain subdominant; if comparable, the T^4/T^{11/3} scalings would not apply.

    Authors: We agree this comparison is needed to support the claim of bremsstrahlung dominance for constraints. The manuscript focuses on deriving bremsstrahlung rates in the ultradegenerate limit as the primary channel, but does not include explicit estimates against other processes. We will add a new subsection in §3 with order-of-magnitude comparisons using standard NS plasma estimates, demonstrating subdominance for T ≲ 10^9 K at nuclear densities. This will include references to relevant literature on competing channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] The statement that purely muon-philic vectors are predominantly emitted by ultra-relativistic electrons due to in-medium renormalization is load-bearing. No explicit derivation, error estimate, or sensitivity check against alternative plasma-screening models is supplied.

    Authors: The renormalization follows from the standard in-medium effective coupling via the longitudinal dielectric function in degenerate QED plasma, leading to electron dominance for muon-philic cases through mixing. However, the manuscript presents the result without a self-contained derivation or sensitivity analysis. We will expand §4.2 with the explicit renormalization formula, a brief derivation, and a short discussion of sensitivity to screening models (e.g., Thomas-Fermi vs. full RPA). An error estimate will be added. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] The reduction by 1/3 (T^{11/3}, T^{17/3}) is attributed to transverse-photon screening, yet the manuscript does not derive or reference the specific screening length or dispersion relation. No check that the approximation remains valid at temperatures where new-particle losses dominate.

    Authors: The power reduction follows from the standard treatment of transverse plasmon dispersion in normal proton matter (Landau damping leading to modified phase space). The manuscript assumes this established result from NS cooling literature but does not re-derive the dispersion or screening length. We will add a brief derivation/reference to the dispersion relation in §5 and include a validity check for the temperature range where new losses could compete with photon cooling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct first-principles rate calculation with no definitional or fitted-input circularity

full rationale

The paper derives boson emission rates from bremsstrahlung processes in the ultradegenerate limit using standard electromagnetic interactions and plasma screening, producing explicit temperature scalings (T^4, T^6, T^{11/3}, etc.) that follow from the assumed dominance of those channels and in-medium renormalization. No quantity is fitted inside the paper and then renamed as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the central claim does not reduce by construction to its own inputs. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as modified Urca neutrino losses.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract; the calculation rests on standard assumptions of dense-matter QFT and the ultradegenerate approximation.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bremsstrahlung in electromagnetic lepton-lepton or lepton-proton collisions is the dominant production channel in the ultradegenerate limit.
    Explicitly stated as the focus of the calculation in the abstract.
  • domain assumption In-medium renormalization of vector-boson couplings is correctly captured by the relativistic plasma treatment.
    Invoked to explain why muon-philic vectors are emitted by electrons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5816 in / 1471 out tokens · 57224 ms · 2026-06-30T16:06:25.286865+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Minimal Proton-Mass Dark Matter

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A minimal dark matter model with one complex scalar carrying B and L numbers, stabilized by proton stability, with mass near the proton mass and relic density from UV freeze-in.

  2. New Gauge Forces, Neutron Stars and Schwinger Neutrino Production

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    For Lμ-Lτ gauge forces with g ≳ 10^{-18}, Schwinger neutrino production in neutron stars alters composition, invalidates merger constraints at g ≳ 10^{-17}, and could yield detectable ~100 MeV neutrino fluxes from you...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The apparent diver- gence of the integral for x12 → 1 is caused by our approx- imation of very small q, requiring q≪ | p1 × p2|/|p1 +p 2|

    sin2 ϕ 2p1p2(1−x 2 12)3/2 = Z dqΥ,(65) 13 already summed over both solutions. The apparent diver- gence of the integral for x12 → 1 is caused by our approx- imation of very small q, requiring q≪ | p1 × p2|/|p1 +p 2|. As we will see, the integral itself is dominated by small values of q for which this approximation is valid. We may therefore extend the int...

  2. [2]

    J0 −K 0 2mD + β4 µ(J2 −K 2) 2mT − 2β2 µ(J1 −K 1) mD +m T # ,(74) N (X) ϕ = α2g2 ϕµm2 µT 3 8π6 J(˜ω)k ω2 β2 ϕ εX εµ 2

    sin2 ϕ 4p1p2(mA +m B)(1−x 2 12)3/2 .(71) Then the emissivities can be expressed in terms of six fundamental integrals Jn = Z dx1dx2dϕ(1−x 2 1)(1−x 2 2)xn 12 sin2ϕ (1−β µβϕx1)4(1−x 2 12)3/2 ,(72) Kn = Z dx1dx2dϕ(1−x 2 1)(1−x 2 2)xn 12 sin2ϕ (1−β µβϕx1)2(1−β µβϕx2)2(1−x 2 12)3/2 , (73) with n = 0, 1, 2. In terms of these integrals, the emission rates become...

  3. [3]

    π2 3(1−β 2µ)2 2 mD + β4 µ mT ! − K0 2mD −2β 2 µ K1 mD +m T +β 4 µ K2 2mT # ,(83) Q(X) ϕ,0 = 11α2g2 ϕµm2 µT 4 2160(1−β 2µ)2 εX εµ 2

    cosn θp1p2 sin2 ψ (1−β µβϕx1)4 p 1−x 2 12 ,(76) so ultimately we have J0 = 2J2 = 4π2 3(1−β 2µβ2 ϕ)2 andJ 1 = 0.(77) The region of near-collinear scattering θp1p2 → 0, where the near-massless approximation for the functions Ψ breaks down, does not lead to any divergence and con- tributes subdominantly, and therefore the result is not sensitive to our earli...

  4. [4]

    1 2mT 2β2 µ −1 + 1−β 2 µ βµ ArcTanhβ µ ! + 1 mD 1 β2µ − 1−β 2 µ β3µ ArcTanhβ µ !# ,(137) Q(X) a,0 = 31π2g2 aµα2T 6 1890(1−β 2µ) εX εµ 2

    sin2ϕ (1−β µβax1)2(1−x 2 12)3/2 ,(130) Ln = Z dx1dx2dϕ xn 2 (1−β µβax1)2(1−x 2 12)1/2 .(131) Both H0 and Ln can be analytically computed. For the relevant values ofn, they read H0 = 4π2 β3aβ3µ (ArcTanh(βaβµ)−β aβµ),(132) L0 =M 0 = 4π2 1−β 2aβ2µ ,(133) L2 = 2π2 β3aβ3µ βaβµ 1−β 2aβ2µ −ArcTanh(β aβµ) ,(134) while they vanish for n odd, and we already neglect...

    2094

  5. [5]

    Gamow and M

    G. Gamow and M. Schoenberg,Neutrino Theory of Stellar Collapse,Phys. Rev.59(1941) 539

    1941

  6. [6]

    D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, O. Y. Gnedin and P. Haensel,Neutrino emission from neutron stars,Phys. Rept.354(2001) 1 [astro-ph/0012122]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    D. G. Yakovlev and C. J. Pethick,Neutron star cooling, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.42(2004) 169 [astro-ph/0402143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    D. Page, U. Geppert and F. Weber,The Cooling of compact stars,Nucl. Phys. A777(2006) 497 [astro-ph/0508056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys

    N. Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 1198. 23

    1984

  10. [10]

    Axions from cooling compact stars: pair-breaking processes

    J. Keller and A. Sedrakian,Axions from cooling compact stars,Nucl. Phys. A897(2013) 62 [1205.6940]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    L. B. Leinson,Axion mass limit from observations of the neutron star in Cassiopeia A,JCAP08(2014) 031 [1405.6873]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Axion cooling of neutron stars

    A. Sedrakian,Axion cooling of neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 065044 [1512.07828]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Axion cooling of neutron stars. II. Beyond hadronic axions

    A. Sedrakian,Axion cooling of neutron stars. II. Beyond hadronic axions,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043011 [1810.00190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Limit on the Axion Decay Constant from the Cooling Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A

    K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, K. Yanagi and J. Zheng, Limit on the Axion Decay Constant from the Cooling Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 103015 [1806.07151]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    L. B. Leinson,Impact of axions on the Cassiopea A neutron star cooling,JCAP09(2021) 001 [2105.14745]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    M. V. Beznogov, E. Rrapaj, D. Page and S. Reddy, Constraints on Axion-like Particles and Nucleon Pairing in Dense Matter from the Hot Neutron Star in HESS J1731-347,Phys. Rev. C98(2018) 035802 [ 1806.07991]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    L. B. Leinson,Constraints on axions from neutron star in HESS J1731-347,JCAP11(2019) 031 [1909.03941]

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long and B. R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 091102 [2111.09892]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Hamaguchi, N

    K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata and J. Zheng,Axion emission from proton Cooper pairs in neutron stars,JCAP06 (2025) 038 [2502.18931]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Bounds on Exotic Particle Interactions from SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 1793

    1988

  21. [21]

    M. S. Turner,Axions from SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. Lett. 60(1988) 1797

    1988

  22. [22]

    Mayle, J

    R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman,Constraints on Axions from SN 1987A,Phys. Lett. B203(1988) 188

    1988

  23. [23]

    G. G. Raffelt,Astrophysical axion bounds,Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 51 [hep-ph/0611350]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo and A. Mirizzi,Improved axion emissivity from a supernova via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung,JCAP10(2019) 016 [1906.11844]. ErratumJCAP05(2020) E01

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt,Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 041 [2401.13728]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Carenza, M

    P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Isern, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero,Axion astrophysics,Phys. Rept.1117 (2025) 1 [2411.02492]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, A. Lella, C. A. J. O’Hare and E. Vitagliano,Leading Bounds on Micrometer to Picometer Fifth Forces from Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 211003 [2506.19906]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    G. G. Raffelt,Axion Constraints From White Dwarf Cooling Times,Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 402

    1986

  29. [29]

    Isern, S

    J. Isern, S. Torres and A. Rebassa-Mansergas,White Dwarfs as Physics Laboratories: Lights and Shadows, Front. Astron. Space Sci.9(2022) 815517 [2202.02052]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Fleury, A

    L. Fleury, A. Obertas, H. Richer and J. Heyl,Axion Constraints from White Dwarf Cooling in 47 Tucanae, 2511.21676

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    M. L. Alberino, M. M. Miller Bertolami, M. E. Camisassa, A. Caputo and S. Torres,New axion bounds derived from the 100-parsec Gaia DR3 white dwarf luminosity function,2603.00901

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Bottaro, A

    S. Bottaro, A. Caputo, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano, Stellar limits on scalars from electron-nucleus bremsstrahlung,JCAP07(2023) 071 [2303.00778]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    D. S. P. Dearborn, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman, Astrophysical Constraints on the Couplings of Axions Majorons and Familons,Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 26

    1986

  34. [34]

    J. A. Grifols, E. Mass´ o and S. Peris,Energy Loss From the Sun and Red Giants: Bounds on Short Range Baryonic and Leptonic Forces,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4 (1989) 311

    1989

  35. [35]

    Red giant bound on the axion-electron coupling reexamined

    G. Raffelt and A. Weiss,Red giant bound on the axion - electron coupling revisited,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1495 [hep-ph/9410205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  36. [36]

    Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects

    E. Hardy and R. Lasenby,Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects,JHEP02(2017) 033 [1611.05852]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Capozzi and G

    F. Capozzi and G. Raffelt,Axion and neutrino bounds improved with new calibrations of the tip of the red-giant branch using geometric distance determinations,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083007 [2007.03694]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Straniero, C

    O. Straniero, C. Pallanca, E. Dalessandro, I. Dominguez, F. R. Ferraro, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and L. Piersanti, The RGB tip of galactic globular clusters and the revision of the axion-electron coupling bound,Astron. Astrophys. 644(2020) A166 [2010.03833]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Bollig, W

    R. Bollig, W. DeRocco, P. W. Graham and H.-T. Janka, Muons in Supernovae: Implications for the Axion-Muon Coupling,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 051104 [2005.07141]. ErratumPhys. Rev. Lett.126, 189901 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Croon, G

    D. Croon, G. Elor, R. K. Leane and S. D. McDermott, Supernova Muons: New Constraints onZ ′ Bosons, Axions and ALPs,JHEP01(2021) 107 [2006.13942]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Muonic Boson Limits: Supernova Redux

    A. Caputo, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Muonic boson limits: Supernova redux,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 035022 [2109.03244]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Akita, S

    K. Akita, S. H. Im, M. Masud and S. Yun,Limits on heavy neutral leptons,Z ′ bosons and majorons from high-energy supernova neutrinos,JHEP07(2024) 057 [2312.13627]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    $L_\mu-L_\tau$ gauge bosons in beam dumps and supernovae

    N. Blinov, P. J. Fox, K. J. Kelly, R. Plestid and T. Zhou, Lµ −L τ gauge bosons in beam dumps and supernovae, 2511.09619

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    R. Z. Ferreira, M. C. D. Marsh and E. Ravensburg,ALP couplings to muons and electrons: a comprehensive analysis of supernova bounds,2510.14469

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    O. Y. Gnedin and D. G. Yakovlev,Thermal conductivity of electrons and muons in neutron star cores,Nucl. Phys. A582(1995) 697

    1995

  46. [46]

    P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev,Electron-muon heat conduction in neutron star cores via the exchange of transverse plasmons,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 103004 [0705.1963]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    A. D. Kaminker and P. Haensel,Neutrino emission due to electron bremsstrahlung in superfluid neutron star cores,Acta Phys. Polon. B30(1999) 1125 [astro-ph/9908249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    Bremsstrahlung neutrinos from electron-electron scattering in a relativistic degenerate electron plasma

    P. Jaikumar, C. Gale and D. Page,Bremsstrahlung neutrinos from electron-electron scattering in a relativistic degenerate electron plasma,Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 123004 [hep-ph/0508245]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    P. S. Shternin,Neutrino-Pair Bremsstrahlung Due to Electromagnetic Collisions in Neutron Star Cores Revisited,Particles8(2025) 100 [2512.08780]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev,Electron thermal conductivity owing to collisions between degenerate electrons,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 043004 [astro-ph/0608371]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    L. B. Leinson and A. Perez,Collective effects in neutrino anti-neutrino synchrotron radiation from neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 043002 [astro-ph/9710257]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    L. B. Leinson,Neutrino pair emission due to electron phonon scattering in a neutron star crust: A reappraisal, Phys. Lett. B469(1999) 166 [hep-ph/0009049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  53. [53]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, A. Lella, G. G. Raffelt, N. Selimovi´ c and E. Vitagliano,Neutron Star Bounds on Muonic Fifth Forces from Picometer to Kilometer Scales, 2026. Work in Progress

    2026

  54. [54]

    J. Alda, G. Levati, P. Paradisi, S. Rigolin and N. Selimovic,Collider and astrophysical signatures of light scalars with enhancedτcouplings,JHEP06(2025) 008 [2407.18296]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Braaten,Neutrino Emissivity of an Ultrarelativistic Plasma from Positron and Plasmino Annihilation, Astrophys

    E. Braaten,Neutrino Emissivity of an Ultrarelativistic Plasma from Positron and Plasmino Annihilation, Astrophys. J.392(1992) 70

    1992

  56. [56]

    Neutrino Energy Loss from the Plasma Process at all Temperatures and Densities

    E. Braaten and D. Segel,Neutrino energy loss from the plasma process at all temperatures and densities,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 1478 [hep-ph/9302213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  57. [57]

    R. A. Wolf,Some Effects of the Strong Interactions on the Properties of Neutron-Star Matter,Astrophys. J.145 (1966) 834

    1966

  58. [58]

    Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars

    B. Haskell and A. Sedrakian,Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars,Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr.457(2018) 401 [1709.10340]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars

    N. Chamel,Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars,J. Astrophys. Astron.38(2017) 43 [1709.07288]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    W. Guo, J. M. Dong, X. Shang, H. F. Zhang, W. Zuo, M. Colonna and U. Lombardo,Proton-proton 1S0 pairing in neutron star,Nucl. Phys. A986(2019) 18 [1810.02709]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    A. D. Kaminker, D. G. Yakovlev and O. Y. Gnedin, Three types of cooling superfluid neutron stars: theory and observations,Astron. Astrophys.383(2002) 1076 [astro-ph/0111429]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  62. [62]

    Meissner and R

    W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld,Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitf¨ ahigkeit,Naturwiss.21(1933) 787

    1933

  63. [63]

    Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics

    C. Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics. Wiley, 1976

    1976

  64. [64]

    Lindhard,On the properties of a gas of charged particles, Kgl

    J. Lindhard,On the properties of a gas of charged particles, Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser. Munksgaard, 1954,Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd.28(1954) 1–57

    1954

  65. [65]

    G. G. Raffelt,Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996

    1996

  66. [66]

    G. I. Lykasov, C. J. Pethick and A. Schwenk,A Unified approach to structure factors and neutrino processes in nucleon matter,Phys. Rev. C78(2008) 045803 [0808.0330]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, ´A. Gil Muyor, H.-T. Janka, G. G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Axion-photon conversion in transient compact stars: Systematics, constraints, and opportunities,JCAP03(2026) 053 [2509.13322]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Bottaro, A

    S. Bottaro, A. Caputo and D. F. G. Fiorillo,Neutrino emission in cold neutron stars: Bremsstrahlung and modified urca rates reexamined,JCAP11(2024) 015 [2406.18640]

    work page arXiv 2024