pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24435 · v1 · pith:BY5OTR4Snew · submitted 2026-05-23 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Multipole structure of the nucleon tensor form factors

Nam-Yong Ghim , Ho-Yeon Won , June-Young Kim , Hyun-Chul Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 13:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords nucleon tensor form factorschiral quark-soliton model1/N_c expansionmultipole structureflavor decompositiontensor chargeanomalous tensor magnetic momenttensor quadrupole moment
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rotational 1/N_c corrections in the chiral quark-soliton model supply the missing flavor components of nucleon tensor multipole form factors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends a leading-order analysis by adding rotational corrections of order 1/N_c to compute the full set of tensor multipole form factors for the nucleon. These corrections generate the leading contributions to flavor channels that vanish without them, allowing a complete isoscalar and isovector decomposition. Numerical results are given for the isoscalar tensor charge, the isovector anomalous tensor magnetic moment, and the isoscalar tensor quadrupole moment, along with their momentum dependence. A sympathetic reader would care because the tensor form factors encode quark spin and orbital structure inside the nucleon, and a consistent flavor picture is needed to connect model predictions to lattice or experimental data.

Core claim

Within the chiral quark-soliton model based on the 1/N_c expansion, the rotational 1/N_c corrections provide the leading nonvanishing contributions to the flavor components of the tensor multipole form factors that are absent at leading order, thereby completing the flavor decomposition at the present order. The model yields the numerical values g_T^{u+d}=0.81, κ_T^{u-d}=1.97, and E_T^{u+d}(0)=5.98; the isoscalar quantities are dominated by valence quarks while the isovector anomalous tensor magnetic moment receives a sizable Dirac-sea contribution. The corresponding form factors fall monotonically with increasing -t.

What carries the argument

Rotational 1/N_c corrections within the chiral quark-soliton model, which generate the previously vanishing flavor components of the tensor multipole form factors.

If this is right

  • The isoscalar tensor charge and quadrupole moment are governed primarily by valence quarks.
  • The isovector anomalous tensor magnetic moment receives a sizable contribution from the Dirac sea.
  • All examined tensor form factors decrease monotonically with increasing momentum transfer.
  • The isovector anomalous tensor magnetic form factor exhibits a pronounced falloff at small |t| due to the Dirac sea.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results suggest that any model of nucleon tensor structure omitting 1/N_c rotational effects will miss essential flavor asymmetries.
  • The separation of valence and sea contributions could be tested by comparing with flavor-tagged lattice simulations at similar pion masses.
  • The momentum dependence implies that low-Q^2 experiments are especially sensitive to sea-quark effects in the tensor dipole channel.

Load-bearing premise

The chiral quark-soliton model with parameters fixed to reproduce known physics accurately represents the nucleon's tensor multipole structure once rotational corrections are included.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD calculation or experimental extraction that finds the isoscalar tensor charge g_T^{u+d} substantially different from 0.81 would contradict the reported values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24435 by Ho-Yeon Won, Hyun-Chul Kim, June-Young Kim, Nam-Yong Ghim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the multipole structure of the nucleon tensor form factors within the chiral quark-soliton model based on the $1/N_c$ expansion. Extending the previous leading-order analysis~\cite{Ghim:2025gqo}, we include the rotational $1/N_c$ corrections. These corrections provide the leading nonvanishing contributions to the flavor components that are absent at leading order, thereby completing the flavor decomposition of the tensor multipole form factors at the present order. We numerically evaluate the isoscalar tensor charge, the isovector anomalous tensor magnetic moment, and the isoscalar tensor quadrupole moment, obtaining $g_T^{u+d}=0.81$, $\kappa_T^{u-d}=1.97$, and $E_T^{u+d}(0)=5.98$, respectively. The isoscalar tensor charge and quadrupole moment are mainly governed by the valence-quark contribution, whereas the isovector anomalous tensor magnetic moment receives a sizable Dirac-sea contribution. We also examine the momentum-transfer dependence of the corresponding form factors. They decrease monotonically with increasing $-t$. In particular, the isovector anomalous tensor magnetic form factor shows a pronounced falloff in the small-$|t|$ region, reflecting the importance of the Dirac sea in the tensor dipole structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a prior leading-order analysis of nucleon tensor form factors in the chiral quark-soliton model by incorporating rotational 1/N_c corrections. It claims these corrections supply the leading nonvanishing contributions to flavor components absent at leading order, thereby completing the flavor decomposition of the tensor multipole form factors at the working order. Numerical evaluations within the model yield g_T^{u+d}=0.81, κ_T^{u-d}=1.97, and E_T^{u+d}(0)=5.98; the isoscalar quantities are valence-dominated while the isovector anomalous magnetic moment receives a sizable Dirac-sea contribution. The momentum dependence of the form factors is also examined and shown to decrease monotonically with -t.

Significance. Within the framework of the chiral quark-soliton model, the work supplies a consistent completion of the flavor decomposition at O(1/N_c) and isolates the relative importance of valence versus sea contributions to different multipoles. The concrete numerical outputs and their Q^2 dependence furnish model-specific predictions that can be compared against other effective approaches or lattice results. The model dependence inherently limits broader QCD implications, but the internal consistency of the 1/N_c treatment is a clear strength of the calculation.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and numerical results section report specific values (g_T^{u+d}=0.81, κ_T^{u-d}=1.97, E_T^{u+d}(0)=5.98) without error bars, variation over the soliton parameters (constituent mass, size), or explicit quantification of the size of the rotational corrections relative to the leading-order results of the cited prior work. Including a brief sensitivity table or discussion would improve the robustness of the presented numbers.
  2. A short table or paragraph directly comparing the new O(1/N_c) results to the leading-order values from Ref. [Ghim:2025gqo] would clarify the impact of the rotational corrections on each multipole.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model-internal evaluation

full rationale

The paper explicitly frames all results as numerical evaluations inside the chiral quark-soliton model with 1/N_c expansion, extending a prior leading-order calculation by the same authors. The central claim—that rotational corrections supply the first non-vanishing contributions to certain flavor components—is a direct consequence of the model's 1/N_c counting rules applied at the next order, not a reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. Numerical values (g_T^{u+d}=0.81 etc.) are presented as model outputs, not as independent predictions or first-principles results. No self-citation is load-bearing for an external uniqueness theorem, no ansatz is smuggled, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The derivation chain remains self-contained within the stated effective model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the validity of the chiral quark-soliton model and 1/N_c expansion for tensor observables; free parameters of the soliton (size, constituent quark mass) are implicitly fitted to other nucleon properties; no new particles are invented.

free parameters (1)
  • soliton parameters (constituent mass, size)
    Standard in the model; chosen to reproduce nucleon mass and other observables before computing tensor form factors.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 1/N_c expansion organizes corrections to leading-order soliton results for tensor form factors.
    Invoked to justify adding rotational corrections that supply missing flavor components.
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry and the Dirac sea are correctly implemented in the model for tensor operators.
    Underlies separation of valence and sea contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5763 in / 1541 out tokens · 22094 ms · 2026-06-30T13:23:29.914507+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ghim, H.-Y

    N.-Y. Ghim, H.-Y. Won, J.-Y. Kim, and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D111, 074024 (2025), arXiv:2501.12241 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    S. L. Adler, E. W. Colglazier, Jr., J. B. Healy, I. Kar- liner, J. Lieberman, Y. J. Ng, and H.-S. Tsao, Phys. Rev. D11, 3309 (1975)

    1975

  3. [3]

    R. L. Jaffe and X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 552 (1991)

    1991

  4. [4]

    R. L. Jaffe and X.-D. Ji, Nucl. Phys. B375, 527 (1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    The Nucleon's Tensor Charge

    H.-x. He and X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. D52, 2960 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    Low Energy Tests of the Weak Interaction

    J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.54, 351 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Annals Phys.318, 119 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Tests of the standard electroweak model in beta decay

    N. Severijns, M. Beck, and O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 991 (2006), arXiv:nucl-ex/0605029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Beta Decays and Non-Standard Interactions in the LHC Era

    V. Cirigliano, S. Gardner, and B. Holstein, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71, 93 (2013), arXiv:1303.6953 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Beyond-Standard-Model Tensor Interaction and Hadron Phenomenology

    A. Courtoy, S. Baeßler, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, and S. Liuti, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 162001 (2015), arXiv:1503.06814 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Bhattacharya, V

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, R. Gupta, A. Joseph, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon (Precision Neu- tron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D92, 094511 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    New physics searches in nuclear and neutron $\beta$ decay

    M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and N. Sev- erijns, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104, 165 (2019), arXiv:1803.08732 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Antelet al., Eur

    C. Antelet al., Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1122 (2023), arXiv:2305.01715 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders

    J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. P. Tait, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. D82, 116010 9 (2010), arXiv:1008.1783 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    From quarks to nucleons in dark matter direct detection

    F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein, and J. Zupan, JHEP 11, 059, arXiv:1707.06998 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    J. Brod, A. Gootjes-Dreesbach, M. Tammaro, and J. Zu- pan, JHEP10, 065, [Erratum: JHEP 07, 012 (2023)], arXiv:1710.10218 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Ma, Phys

    K. Ma, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102090 (2025), arXiv:2404.06419 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Glick-Magid, Phys

    A. Glick-Magid, Phys. Rev. D110, L051701 (2024), arXiv:2312.08339 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Liang, Y

    J.-H. Liang, Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma, and H.-L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D111, 095033 (2025), arXiv:2501.13501 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    J. P. Ralston and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B152, 109 (1979)

    1979

  21. [21]

    Kodaira, S

    J. Kodaira, S. Matsuda, K. Sasaki, and T. Uematsu, Nucl. Phys. B159, 99 (1979)

    1979

  22. [22]

    Artru and M

    X. Artru and M. Mekhfi, Z. Phys. C45, 669 (1990)

    1990

  23. [23]

    A. P. Bukhvostov, E. A. Kuraev, and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. Phys. JETP60, 22 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    J. L. Cortes, B. Pire, and J. P. Ralston, Z. Phys. C55, 409 (1992)

    1992

  25. [25]

    Transverse-Spin and Transverse-Momentum Effects in High-Energy Processes

    V. Barone, F. Bradamante, and A. Martin, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.65, 267 (2010), arXiv:1011.0909 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    C. A. Aidala, S. D. Bass, D. Hasch, and G. K. Mallot, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 655 (2013), arXiv:1209.2803 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Diehl, Prog

    S. Diehl, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.133, 104069 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    L. W. Whitlow, E. M. Riordan, S. Dasu, S. Rock, and A. Bodek, Phys. Lett. B282, 475 (1992)

    1992

  29. [29]

    PERTURBATIVE QCD AND NUCLEON STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS.

    J. Kodaira, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.120, 37 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9501381

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  30. [30]

    A. V. Efremov, K. Goeke, and P. Schweitzer, Eur. Phys. J. C35, 207 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403124

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    Baroneet al.(PAX), (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0505054

    V. Baroneet al.(PAX), (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0505054

    work page arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Anselmino, V

    M. Anselmino, V. Barone, A. Drago, and N. N. Nikolaev, Phys. Lett. B594, 97 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0403114

    work page arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Drell-Yan processes, transversity and light-cone wavefunctions

    B. Pasquini, M. Pincetti, and S. Boffi, Phys. Rev. D76, 034020 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    Single-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering on a transversely polarized hydrogen target

    A. Airapetianet al.(HERMES), Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 012002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0408013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    V. Y. Alexakhinet al.(COMPASS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 202002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0503002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Transversity and Collins functions from SIDIS and e+e- data

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, and C. Turk, Phys. Rev. D75, 054032 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Update on transversity and Collins functions from SIDIS and e+ e- data

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, and S. Melis, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.191, 98 (2009), arXiv:0812.4366 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Simultaneous extraction of transversity and Collins functions from new SIDIS and e+e- data

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murgia, and A. Prokudin, Phys. Rev. D87, 094019 (2013), arXiv:1303.3822 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, P. Sun, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D91, 071501 (2015), arXiv:1410.4877 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    J. C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396, 161 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9208213

    work page arXiv 1993

  41. [41]

    Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in e+e- Annihilation at \sqrt{s} = 10.58 GeV

    R. Seidlet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D78, 032011 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 039905 (2012)], arXiv:0805.2975 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    Realistic estimate of valence transversity distributions from inclusive dihadron production

    M. Radici, A. Courtoy, A. Bacchetta, and M. Guagnelli, JHEP05, 123, arXiv:1503.03495 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Z. Ye, N. Sato, K. Allada, T. Liu, J.-P. Chen, H. Gao, Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, P. Sun, and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B767, 91 (2017), arXiv:1609.02449 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    H.-W. Lin, W. Melnitchouk, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, and H. Shows, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 152502 (2018), arXiv:1710.09858 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Cocuzza, A

    C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, and R. Seidl (JAM), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091901 (2024), arXiv:2306.12998 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Cocuzza, A

    C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, and R. Seidl (Jefferson Lab Angular Mo- mentum (JAM)), Phys. Rev. D109, 034024 (2024), arXiv:2308.14857 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Accessing nucleon transversity with one-point energy correlators

    M.-S. Gao, Z.-B. Kang, W. Li, and D. Y. Shao, (2025), arXiv:2509.15809 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    S. Aoki, M. Doui, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Kuramashi, Phys. Rev. D56, 433 (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9608115

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  49. [49]

    Transverse spin structure of the nucleon from lattice QCD simulations

    M. G¨ ockeler, P. H¨ agler, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Sch¨ afer, G. Schierholz, H. St¨ uben, and J. M. Zanotti (QCDSF, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 222001 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0612032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Nucleon scalar and tensor charges using lattice QCD simulations at the physical value of the pion mass

    C. Alexandrouet al., Phys. Rev. D95, 114514 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 099906 (2017)], arXiv:1703.08788 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Flavor diagonal tensor charges of the nucleon from 2+1+1 flavor lattice QCD

    R. Gupta, B. Yoon, T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, Y.-C. Jang, and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D98, 091501 (2018), arXiv:1808.07597 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Nucleon charges with dynamical overlap fermions

    N. Yamanaka, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and H. Ohki (JLQCD), Phys. Rev. D98, 054516 (2018), arXiv:1805.10507 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finken- rath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco, Phys. Rev. D102, 054517 (2020), arXiv:1909.00485 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Alexandrou, M

    C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, and F. Manigrasso, Phys. Rev. D104, 054503 (2021), arXiv:2106.16065 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    S. Park, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, S. Mondal, T. Bhat- tacharya, Y.-C. Jang, B. Jo´ o, and F. Winter (Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME)), Phys. Rev. D105, 054505 (2022), arXiv:2103.05599 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, P. Di- mopoulos, J. Finkenrath, R. Frezzotti, K. Had- jiyiannakou, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, G. Koutsou, G. Spanoudes, and C. Urbach, Phys. Rev. D107, 054504 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Rodekamp, M

    M. Rodekamp, M. Engelhardt, J. R. Green, S. Krieg, S. Liuti, S. Meinel, J. W. Negele, A. Pochinsky, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D109, 074508 (2024), arXiv:2401.05360 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Wang, Z.-C

    J.-H. Wang, Z.-C. Hu, X. Ji, X. Jiang, Y. Su, P. Sun, and Y.-B. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2511.02326 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    X.-D. Ji, J. Phys. G24, 1181 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9807358

    work page arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Diehl, Eur

    M. Diehl, Eur. Phys. J. C19, 485 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0101335

    work page arXiv 2001

  61. [61]

    Goeke, M

    K. Goeke, M. V. Polyakov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.47, 401 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0106012

    work page arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    Diehl, Phys

    M. Diehl, Phys. Rept.388, 41 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0307382

    work page arXiv 2003

  63. [63]

    A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rept.418, 1 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [64]

    Generalized parton distributions and the structure of the nucleon

    S. Boffi and B. Pasquini, Riv. Nuovo Cim.30, 387 (2007), arXiv:0711.2625 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    GPD phenomenology and DVCS fitting - Entering the high-precision era

    K. Kumericki, S. Liuti, and H. Moutarde, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 157 (2016), arXiv:1602.02763 [hep-ph]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    d’Hose, S

    N. d’Hose, S. Niccolai, and A. Rostomyan, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 151 (2016)

    2016

  67. [67]

    Transverse Deformation of Parton Distributions and Transversity Decomposition of Angular Momentum

    M. Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D72, 094020 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0505189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  68. [68]

    Spin densities in the transverse plane and generalized transversity distributions

    M. Diehl and P. H¨ agler, Eur. Phys. J. C44, 87 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [69]

    Chiral-odd generalized parton distributions in constituent quark models

    B. Pasquini, M. Pincetti, and S. Boffi, Phys. Rev. D72, 094029 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0510376

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    Unified framework for generalized and transverse-momentum dependent parton distributions within a 3Q light-cone picture of the nucleon

    C. Lorce, B. Pasquini, and M. Vanderhaeghen, JHEP 05, 041, arXiv:1102.4704 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Tezgin, B

    K. Tezgin, B. Maynard, and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D110, 054028 (2024), arXiv:2404.11563 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    S. Kaur, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, and J. P. Vary (BLFQ), Phys. Rev. D109, 014015 (2024), arXiv:2307.09869 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Chiral-odd generalized parton distributions for the low-lying octet baryons

    N. Kaur and H. Dahiya, Phys. Rev. D112, 074024 (2025), arXiv:2506.02464 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Luan and Z

    X. Luan and Z. Lu, Phys. Rev. D110, 034021 (2024), arXiv:2404.13962 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, and M. Savci, Phys. Rev. D84, 076005 (2011), arXiv:1108.2019 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    H.-C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, and K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D53, 4715 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9509283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  77. [77]

    H.-C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, and K. Goeke, Phys. Lett. B387, 577 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9604442

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  78. [78]

    Chiral-odd generalized parton distributions, transversity decomposition of angular momentum, and tensor charges of the nucleon

    M. Wakamatsu, Phys. Rev. D79, 014033 (2009), arXiv:0811.4196 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    Tensor charges of light baryons in the Infinite Momentum Frame

    C. Lorce, Phys. Rev. D79, 074027 (2009), arXiv:0708.4168 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    Anomalous tensor magnetic moments and form factors of the proton in the self-consistent chiral quark-soliton model

    T. Ledwig, A. Silva, and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D82, 054014 (2010), arXiv:1007.1355 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.