pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24905 · v1 · pith:NL247QWFnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· gr-qc

QPEs from Warped Disk Collisions with EMRIs: Brightness-Recurrence Diagram and Gravitational-Wave Follow-up

Bo-An Chen , Bei You , Giovanni Miniutti , Ning Jiang , Zhen Pan , Tao Yang , Xi-Long Fan , Kai Liao
show 6 more authors
Xu-Heng Ding Zong-Hong Zhu Shuai-Kang Yang Sai-En Xu Han He Xiao Fan
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords quasi-periodic eruptionsextreme mass ratio inspiralswarped accretion disksbrightness-recurrence diagramGSN 069LISA
0
0 comments X

The pith

Collisions between an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral and a warped accretion disk produce the long-short and strong-weak patterns seen in quasi-periodic eruptions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the correlated patterns in quasi-periodic eruptions arise when an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral repeatedly strikes a warped accretion disk formed after a tidal disruption event. The warp causes recurrence time and burst energy to vary together according to the inspiral's apsidal precession. The authors introduce the Brightness-Recurrence Diagram to display this correlation as an elliptical trajectory traced by successive bursts. The tilt of the ellipse directly encodes whether the inspiral orbits prograde or retrograde relative to the central black hole spin. When the model is applied to the source GSN 069 it reproduces the observed patterns and remains consistent with either a prograde stellar secondary or a retrograde stellar-mass black hole.

Core claim

Quasi-periodic eruptions result from an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral colliding with a warped accretion disk; the Brightness-Recurrence Diagram shows the bursts tracing an elliptical trajectory set by the inspiral's apsidal precession, with the ellipse tilt encoding prograde versus retrograde orientation, and this framework reproduces the data for GSN 069 while allowing either a prograde stellar secondary or a retrograde stellar-mass black hole whose orbital decay could bring it within LISA reach in decades.

What carries the argument

The Brightness-Recurrence Diagram, in which bursts trace an elliptical trajectory driven by the EMRI's apsidal precession, with the tilt of the ellipse encoding prograde versus retrograde orientation relative to the central black hole spin.

Load-bearing premise

The accretion disk is warped after a tidal disruption event in a manner that directly ties the EMRI's apsidal precession to both recurrence time and burst energy.

What would settle it

Future observations of GSN 069 or similar sources showing QPE bursts that fail to trace an elliptical path in the brightness-recurrence diagram, or whose ellipse tilt contradicts independent spin-orientation measurements, would falsify the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24905 by Bei You, Bo-An Chen, Giovanni Miniutti, Han He, Kai Liao, Ning Jiang, Sai-En Xu, Shuai-Kang Yang, Tao Yang, Xiao Fan, Xi-Long Fan, Xu-Heng Ding, Zhen Pan, Zong-Hong Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The correlated long/short and strong/weak patterns [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Structure of a warped TDE disk. The upper panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Brightness-Recurrence Diagram (BRD) and long-term light curve for GSN 069. (a) BRD with model predictions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The characteristic strain over LISA’s four-year op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quasi-Periodic Eruptions (QPEs) display correlated long/short and strong/weak patterns that remain unexplained by existing flat-disk collision models. We propose that these features arise from an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral (EMRI) colliding with a warped accretion disk, likely formed after a tidal disruption event. The warp modulates both recurrence time and burst energy, encoding the disk geometry -- and thus the spin of the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) -- into the X-ray light curve. We introduce the Brightness-Recurrence Diagram (BRD) to visualize this correlation, where QPE bursts trace an elliptical trajectory driven by the EMRI's apsidal precession; the tilt of this ellipse encodes whether the EMRI is prograde or retrograde relative to the SMBH spin. Applying this model to the prototypical QPE source GSN 069 successfully reproduces the observed patterns. The data are consistent with either a prograde stellar secondary or a retrograde stellar-mass black hole. In the stellar-mass black hole scenario, ongoing orbital decay could render the EMRI detectable by LISA within a few decades, facilitating gravitational-wave follow-up and independent multimessenger constraints on the system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the correlated long/short and strong/weak patterns in quasi-periodic eruptions (QPEs) arise from an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral (EMRI) colliding with a warped accretion disk formed after a tidal disruption event. The warp is argued to modulate both recurrence time and burst energy according to the EMRI's apsidal precession; this correlation is visualized in a new Brightness-Recurrence Diagram (BRD) in which bursts trace an elliptical trajectory whose tilt encodes prograde versus retrograde orientation relative to the central SMBH spin. The model is applied to the prototypical source GSN 069 and claimed to reproduce the observed patterns, with the data consistent with either a prograde stellar secondary or a retrograde stellar-mass black hole; the latter case is said to imply LISA detectability within decades via ongoing orbital decay.

Significance. If the central geometric mechanism holds, the work supplies a concrete link between disk warp geometry (hence SMBH spin) and observable QPE correlations that flat-disk models do not address, while introducing the BRD as a practical diagnostic for EMRI orientation. The forward prediction of LISA detectability constitutes a falsifiable multimessenger implication that could be tested independently of the X-ray data.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and GSN 069 application] Abstract and the section applying the model to GSN 069: the claim that the model 'successfully reproduces' the observed patterns provides no quantitative fit statistics, error analysis, or comparison against alternative (flat-disk or other) models. Without these, it remains unclear whether the reproduction is a genuine prediction or the result of post-hoc adjustment of warp parameters or precession rates to the same light curve used to define the patterns.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the key assumptions underlying the warp geometry and apsidal-precession modulation before the BRD is introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and GSN 069 application] Abstract and the section applying the model to GSN 069: the claim that the model 'successfully reproduces' the observed patterns provides no quantitative fit statistics, error analysis, or comparison against alternative (flat-disk or other) models. Without these, it remains unclear whether the reproduction is a genuine prediction or the result of post-hoc adjustment of warp parameters or precession rates to the same light curve used to define the patterns.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies on a qualitative match between the observed long/short and strong/weak correlations in GSN 069 and the elliptical trajectories predicted by the BRD. The warp parameters and precession rate are set by the requirement that the EMRI apsidal precession produces the observed recurrence-time modulation while the collision geometry sets the brightness variation; these are not freely adjusted after the fact but are fixed by the disk warp induced by the TDE and the SMBH spin orientation. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the absence of formal statistics. In revision we will add (i) a quantitative comparison of model-predicted versus observed recurrence times and energies with associated uncertainties, (ii) a brief error analysis on the derived warp angle and precession period, and (iii) an explicit side-by-side demonstration that flat-disk models produce no correlated BRD ellipse and therefore cannot account for the observed patterns. These additions will make clear that the reproduction follows from the geometric mechanism rather than post-hoc tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present the warped-disk EMRI model as a geometric proposal whose modulation of recurrence time and burst energy follows from apsidal precession, with the BRD ellipse tilt offered as a direct consequence. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are quoted that reduce any prediction to an input by construction. The reproduction claim for GSN 069 is stated at the level of pattern matching without visible reduction of outputs to the same data used for fitting. The LISA detectability statement is a forward projection. Per the rules, absence of quotable self-definitional or fitted-input reductions requires score 0; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive extraction; the model implicitly relies on the existence of a post-TDE warped disk whose geometry controls collision timing and energy, plus standard EMRI apsidal precession, but no explicit free parameters or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5807 in / 1352 out tokens · 22383 ms · 2026-06-29T23:53:47.941792+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    By marking in gray the region 13 FIG

    therein). Typical late-stage TDE warp structure (Fig. 2) shows smaller inner-disk inclination and lead- ing/lagging twist phase. This warp structure modulates the EMRI-disk intersection points, naturally producing the observed QPE patterns (see follow). QPE Patterns from Warped Disk Collisions. Given a slightly eccentric orbit, the long/short pattern is m...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2000

  2. [2]

    Miniutti, R

    G. Miniutti, R. D. Saxton, M. Giustini, K. D. Alexander, R. P. Fender, I. Heywood, I. Monageng, M. Coriat, A. K. Tzioumis, A. M. Read, C. Knigge, P. Gandhi, M. L. Pre- torius, and B. Ag´ ıs-Gonz´ alez, Nature (London)573, 381 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    L. Sun, X. Shu, and T. Wang, Astrophys. J.768, 167 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    X. W. Shu, T. G. Wang, N. Jiang, J. X. Wang, L. M. Sun, and H. Y. Zhou, Astrophys. J.837, 3 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Giustini, G

    M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, and R. D. Saxton, Astron. As- trophys.636, L2 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Arcodia, A

    R. Arcodia, A. Merloni, K. Nandra, J. Buchner, M. Sal- vato, D. Pasham, R. Remillard, J. Comparat, G. Lamer, G. Ponti,et al., Nature (London)592, 704 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Arcodia, Z

    R. Arcodia, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, A. Malyali, A. Rau, J. Chakraborty, A. Goodwin, D. Buckley, J. Brink, M. Gromadzki,et al., Astron. Astrophys.684, A64 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Arcodia, P

    R. Arcodia, P. Baldini, A. Merloni, A. Rau, K. Nandra, J. Chakraborty, A. J. Goodwin, M. J. Page, J. Buchner, M. Masterson,et al., Astrophys. J.989, 13 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Chakraborty, E

    J. Chakraborty, E. Kara, M. Masterson, M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, and R. Saxton, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L40 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Nicholl, D

    M. Nicholl, D. R. Pasham, A. Mummery, M. Guolo, K. Gendreau, G. C. Dewangan, E. C. Ferrara, R. Remil- lard, C. Bonnerot, J. Chakraborty,et al., Nature (Lon- don)634, 804 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, J

    L. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, J. Chakraborty, P. S´ anchez-S´ aez, C. Ricci, J. Cuadra, B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, P. Ar´ evalo, A. Rau, R. Arcodia,et al., Nature Astronomy 9, 895 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Chakraborty, E

    J. Chakraborty, E. Kara, R. Arcodia, J. Buchner, M. Giustini, L. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, I. Linial, M. Mas- terson, G. Miniutti, A. Mummery, C. Panagiotou, E. Quintin, and P. S´ anchez-S´ aez, Astrophys. J. Lett.983, L39 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    S. D. Bykov, M. R. Gilfanov, R. A. Sunyaev, and P. S. Medvedev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.540, 30 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Baldini, A

    P. Baldini, A. Rau, A. Merloni, B. Trakhtenbrot, R. Ar- codia, M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, S. J. Brennan, M. Frey- berg, P. S´ anchez-S´ aez, I. Grotova, Z. Liu, T. Lian, and K. Nandra, Astron. Astrophys.706, L15 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    L. J. Dai, S. V. Fuerst, and R. Blandford, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.402, 1614 (2010)

    2010

  16. [16]

    J. Xian, F. Zhang, L. Dou, J. He, and X. Shu, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L32 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. D. Metzger, Astrophys. J.957, 34 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Franchini, M

    A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, A. Lupi, G. Miniutti, E. Bor- tolas, M. Giustini, M. Dotti, A. Sesana, R. Arcodia, and T. Ryu, Astron. Astrophys.675, A100 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Tagawa and Z

    H. Tagawa and Z. Haiman, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 69 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    C. Zhou, L. Huang, K. Guo, Y.-P. Li, and Z. Pan, Phys. Rev. D109, 103031 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    C. Zhou, B. Zhong, Y. Zeng, L. Huang, and Z. Pan, Phys. Rev. D110, 083019 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    C. Zhou, Y. Zeng, and Z. Pan, Astrophys. J.985, 242 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    H. Guo, Z. Yan, Y.-P. Li, J. Chakraborty, P. S´ anchez- S´ aez, L. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, W. Zhang, J. Sun, S.-L. Li, H. Deng, W. Zuo, H. Tagawa, X. Pan, M. Zhang, P. Ar´ evalo, P. Lira, C. Jin, and M. Gu, Astrophys. J. Lett.1000, L57 (2026)

    2026

  24. [24]

    ´Sniegowska, M

    M. ´Sniegowska, M. Grz¸ edzielski, B. Czerny, and A. Ja- 7 niuk, Astron. Astrophys.672, A19 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Pan, S.-L

    X. Pan, S.-L. Li, X. Cao, G. Miniutti, and M. Gu, As- trophys. J. Lett.928, L18 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Pan, S.-L

    X. Pan, S.-L. Li, and X. Cao, Astrophys. J.952, 32 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Raj and C

    A. Raj and C. J. Nixon, Astrophys. J.909, 82 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Pan, S.-L

    X. Pan, S.-L. Li, X. Cao, B. Liu, and W. Yuan, Astro- phys. J.989, 196 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    King, Mon

    A. King, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, L120 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    King, Mon

    A. King, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.515, 4344 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    King, Mon

    A. King, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.520, L63 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Z. Y. Zhao, Y. Y. Wang, Y. C. Zou, F. Y. Wang, and Z. G. Dai, Astron. Astrophys.661, A55 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Chen, R.-F

    J.-H. Chen, R.-F. Shen, and S.-F. Liu, Astrophys. J.947, 32 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Wu, Y.-F

    X.-J. Wu, Y.-F. Yuan, Y. Luo, and W. Lin, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.529, 1440 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    M. Wang, J. Yin, Y. Ma, and Q. Wu, Astrophys. J.933, 225 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Ingram, S

    A. Ingram, S. E. Motta, S. Aigrain, and A. Karastergiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.504, 5512 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Miniutti, M

    G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, R. D. Saxton, A. M. Read, S. Bianchi, and K. D. Alexander, Astron. Astro- phys.670, A93 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Giustini, G

    M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, R. Arcodia, A. Goodwin, K. D. Alexander, J. Chakraborty, J. Buchner, P. Kosec, R. Sax- ton, M. Bonetti,et al., Astron. Astrophys.692, A15 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Sheng, T

    Z. Sheng, T. Wang, G. Ferland, X. Shu, C. Yang, N. Jiang, and Y. Chen, Astrophys. J. Lett.920, L25 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    Quintin, N

    E. Quintin, N. A. Webb, S. Guillot, G. Miniutti, E. S. Kammoun, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, G. Soucail, N. Clerc, R. Amato, and C. B. Markwardt, Astron. Astrophys. 675, A152 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Jiang and Z

    N. Jiang and Z. Pan, Astrophys. J. Lett.983, L18 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Guolo, A

    M. Guolo, A. Mummery, T. Wevers, M. Nicholl, S. Gezari, A. Ingram, and D. R. Pasham, Astrophys. J. 985, 146 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Guolo, A

    M. Guolo, A. Mummery, A. Ingram, M. Nicholl, S. Gezari, and E. Nathan, Astrophys. J.992, 114 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Stone and A

    N. Stone and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 061302 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Miniutti, M

    G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, R. Arcodia, R. D. Saxton, J. Chakraborty, A. M. Read, and E. Kara, Astron. As- trophys.674, L1 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Miniutti, A

    G. Miniutti, A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, M. Giustini, J. Chakraborty, R. Arcodia, R. Saxton, E. Quintin, P. Kosec, I. Linial, and A. Sesana, Astron. Astrophys. 693, A179 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Arcodia, I

    R. Arcodia, I. Linial, G. Miniutti, A. Franchini, M. Gius- tini, M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, R. Soria, J. Chakraborty, M. Dotti, E. Kara, A. Merloni, G. Ponti, and F. Vincen- telli, Astron. Astrophys.690, A80 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    L. Lui, A. Torres-Orjuela, R. K. Chowdhury, and L. Dai, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2508.07961 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpi, K. Danzmann, M. Hewitson, K. Holley- Bockelmann, P. Jetzer, G. Nelemans, A. Petiteau, D. Shoemaker, C. Sopuerta, R. Stebbins,et al., arXiv preprint , arXiv:2402.07571 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Luo, L.-S

    J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, International Journal of Modern Physics A35, 2050075 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    C. Zhou, Z. Pan, N. Jiang, and W. Zhao, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.543, 1816 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Laghi, N

    D. Laghi, N. Tamanini, W. Del Pozzo, A. Sesana, J. Gair, S. Babak, and D. Izquierdo-Villalba, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.508, 4512 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    Y. Zhan, D. Wang, S.-X. Yi, and F.-Y. Wang, Astrophys. J.997, 134 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017)

    2017

  56. [56]

    Maselli, N

    A. Maselli, N. Franchini, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, S. Barsanti, and P. Pani, Nature Astronomy6, 464 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C

    A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C. F. Sopuerta, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2401.08085 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    S. H. Lubow and G. I. Ogilvie, Astrophys. J.538, 326 (2000)

    2000

  59. [59]

    J. C. B. Papaloizou and D. N. C. Lin, Astrophys. J.438, 841 (1995)

    1995

  60. [60]

    Peng, J.-M

    Y.-C. Peng, J.-M. Wang, P. Du, S. Zhai, and Y.-R. Li, Astrophys. J.978, 103 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Astron. Astrophys.24, 337 (1973)

    1973

  62. [62]

    J. M. Bardeen and J. A. Petterson, Astrophys. J. Lett. 195, L65 (1975)

    1975

  63. [63]

    G. I. Ogilvie, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.304, 557 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    J. J. Zanazzi and D. Lai, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.487, 4965 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by publisher] for disk structure derivation, which includes Ref. [65]

  66. [66]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Astro- phys. J.178, 347 (1972)

    1972

  67. [67]

    Wevers, D

    T. Wevers, D. R. Pasham, P. Jalan, S. Rakshit, and R. Arcodia, Astron. Astrophys.659, L2 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Mummery, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2504.21456 (2025)

    A. Mummery, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2504.21456 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    C. M. Allievi, L. Broggi, A. Sesana, and M. Bonetti, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2603.02302 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Liu, S.-F

    K. Liu, S.-F. Liu, Z. Pan, H. Deng, R. Shen, and C. Yu, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2603.00226 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Linial and R

    I. Linial and R. Sari, Astrophys. J.945, 86 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    Linial, B

    I. Linial, B. D. Metzger, and E. Quataert, Astrophys. J. 991, 147 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Radiation-hydrodynamics of star-disc collisions for quasi-periodic eruptions

    T. Jankoviˇ c, C. Bonnerot, S. Karpov, and A. Jurca, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2602.02656 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Huang, I

    X. Huang, I. Linial, and Y.-F. Jiang, Astrophys. J.993, 186 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    I. Vurm, I. Linial, and B. D. Metzger, Astrophys. J.983, 40 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    Chakraborty, R

    J. Chakraborty, R. Arcodia, E. Kara, G. Miniutti, M. Giustini, A. J. Tetarenko, L. Rhodes, A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, K. B. Burdge, A. J. Goodwin, T. J. Mac- carone, A. Merloni, G. Ponti, R. A. Remillard, and R. D. Saxton, Astrophys. J.965, 12 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    Blanchet, Living Reviews in Relativity17, 2 (2014)

    L. Blanchet, Living Reviews in Relativity17, 2 (2014)

    2014

  78. [78]

    Boh´ e, S

    A. Boh´ e, S. Marsat, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, Classical and Quantum Gravity30, 075017 (2013)

    2013

  79. [79]

    Kumar, R

    P. Kumar, R. Narayan, and J. L. Johnson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.388, 1729 (2008)

    2008

  80. [80]

    Shen and C

    R.-F. Shen and C. D. Matzner, Astrophys. J.784, 87 (2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.