pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24910 · v1 · pith:NRGKL36Mnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CE

Noise-Robust Financial Numerical Entity Attribute Tagging

Hsin-Min Lu , Chen-Yang Lai , Yi-Jhen Li , Ju-Chun Yen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CE
keywords noisy label learningfinancial entity taggingXBRLmulti-attribute predictionnoise-robust trainingnumerical entity attributesconcept name prediction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Task-aware instance weighting lets models learn multiple financial numerical attributes from noisy XBRL labels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces NORA to recover concept name, time relation, scale, and sign for numerical mentions in financial reports. It counters errors in labels derived from inline XBRL filings by applying task-aware instance-specific weighting during training. The authors also release a 6.6 million instance benchmark with filing metadata and propose Neighborhood Prior-adjusted KNN filtering to support reliable evaluation on real noisy test data. Experiments show NORA outperforms Co-teaching, Mixup, SSR, and SelfMix on accuracy and F1 for concept name and time-relation prediction while staying competitive on scale and sign. The work demonstrates that joint modeling of rich attributes is possible without first cleaning the labels.

Core claim

NORA uses task-aware instance-specific weighting to attenuate the influence of noisy XBRL-derived labels and achieves the best accuracy, macro F1, and weighted F1 on concept name and time-relation prediction tasks, remaining competitive on scale and sign, on both unfiltered and noise-filtered test settings of a new 6.6 million instance benchmark.

What carries the argument

Task-aware instance-specific weighting that reduces the training influence of likely noisy instances, together with Neighborhood Prior-adjusted KNN (NPK) filtering for evaluation.

If this is right

  • Models can be trained directly on large volumes of unfiltered real-world XBRL filings rather than requiring cleaned subsets.
  • Joint prediction of concept name, time relation, scale, and sign becomes practical for downstream financial analysis tasks.
  • Performance gains appear largest for the two attributes that current methods handle least well: concept name and time relation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same weighting idea could be tested on other domains that derive labels automatically from structured documents, such as legal or medical records.
  • If the weighting proves stable across filing types, it could lower the cost of building large labeled financial datasets.
  • The benchmark construction process itself shows how filing metadata can be used to create richer evaluation splits.

Load-bearing premise

Task-aware instance-specific weighting can reliably down-weight erroneous labels from XBRL without knowing which labels are wrong and without introducing new systematic biases.

What would settle it

A controlled test where a known fraction of labels are flipped according to realistic XBRL error patterns, then measuring whether NORA's advantage over baselines shrinks or disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24910 by Chen-Yang Lai, Hsin-Min Lu, Ju-Chun Yen, Yi-Jhen Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of input context and corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example JSONL data instance from NORA DATASET. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Financial Numerical Entity (FNE) understanding aims to recover the meaning of numerical mentions in financial reports. Existing studies primarily focus on concept name prediction and face two important limitations. First, labels derived from inline XBRL may contain errors because filings are usually prepared manually. Second, other important FNE attributes, such as reporting-time relation, measurement scale, and accounting sign, are less emphasized. We propose \textbf{NO}ise-\textbf{R}obust Tagging for Rich Financial Numerical Entity \textbf{A}ttributes (\textsc{NORA}) to address these gaps. NORA uses task-aware instance-specific weighting to attenuate the influence of noisy labels during training, and we further propose the Neighborhood Prior-adjusted KNN (NPK) filtering method for more reliable evaluation on real-world noisy test sets. In addition, we construct a large-scale benchmark containing 6.6 million instances with multi-attribute labels and filing metadata. Experiments show that \textsc{NORA} performs strongly compared with state-of-the-art noisy-label baselines, including Co-teaching, Mixup, SSR, and SelfMix. Moreover, NORA is robust under both unfiltered and noise-filtered test settings. It achieves the best Accuracy, Macro F1, and Weighted F1 for concept name and time-relation prediction, while remaining competitive on scale and sign prediction. These results demonstrate the value of jointly modeling rich FNE attributes while accounting for label noise in real-world financial filings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes NORA for noise-robust multi-attribute tagging of financial numerical entities (concept name, time-relation, scale, sign) extracted from reports. It uses task-aware instance-specific weighting to downweight noisy XBRL-derived labels during training, introduces the Neighborhood Prior-adjusted KNN (NPK) method for creating noise-filtered test sets, and releases a 6.6 million instance benchmark with filing metadata. Experiments claim that NORA outperforms noisy-label baselines (Co-teaching, Mixup, SSR, SelfMix) on Accuracy, Macro F1, and Weighted F1 for concept name and time-relation prediction under both unfiltered and NPK-filtered test conditions while remaining competitive on scale and sign.

Significance. If the empirical comparisons hold after addressing evaluation controls, the work provides a practical advance in financial NLP by jointly modeling multiple FNE attributes and handling real-world label noise at scale. The construction of the large benchmark with multi-attribute labels is a concrete contribution that could support follow-on research; the instance-weighting and neighborhood-prior techniques are domain-adapted variants of existing noisy-label methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central robustness claim includes superior performance on the noise-filtered test setting produced by the paper's own NPK method (Abstract). Because NPK relies on neighborhood priors and task-aware signals that overlap with the instance-weighting signals used by NORA, the filtered split may not be method-neutral; retained instances could systematically favor NORA's learned weights. This is load-bearing for the cross-baseline comparison and requires either an independent noise oracle, a human-verified subset, or an ablation showing that NPK preserves the original label-error distribution equally across all methods.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states strong results on Accuracy/Macro F1/Weighted F1 but provides no information on the precise form of the task-aware weighting function, the hyper-parameters of the baselines, error bars, or train/validation/test splits. These experimental controls are required to substantiate the claim that NORA is robust under both unfiltered and filtered conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Define all acronyms (e.g., NPK, FNE, XBRL) on first use in the main text.
  2. Clarify whether the 6.6 million instances are unique filings or include duplicates across periods; this affects the independence assumptions in the neighborhood-based NPK method.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central robustness claim includes superior performance on the noise-filtered test setting produced by the paper's own NPK method (Abstract). Because NPK relies on neighborhood priors and task-aware signals that overlap with the instance-weighting signals used by NORA, the filtered split may not be method-neutral; retained instances could systematically favor NORA's learned weights. This is load-bearing for the cross-baseline comparison and requires either an independent noise oracle, a human-verified subset, or an ablation showing that NPK preserves the original label-error distribution equally across all methods.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern that NPK filtering could introduce bias favoring NORA due to overlapping signals. NPK constructs the filtered test set using neighborhood priors derived from the data distribution and label consistency, applied independently after training, while NORA's task-aware weighting is learned dynamically from per-instance losses during optimization. Nevertheless, to directly address the potential non-neutrality, we will add an ablation in the revised manuscript that (i) estimates label error rates on the NPK-filtered set using an independent noise detection baseline (e.g., a separate loss-thresholding approach) and (ii) verifies that the retained error distribution remains comparable across all evaluated methods, including the baselines. We will also emphasize the unfiltered test results as the primary evaluation metric. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states strong results on Accuracy/Macro F1/Weighted F1 but provides no information on the precise form of the task-aware weighting function, the hyper-parameters of the baselines, error bars, or train/validation/test splits. These experimental controls are required to substantiate the claim that NORA is robust under both unfiltered and filtered conditions.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional context on the experimental controls. Due to abstract length constraints, we will revise it to briefly specify the task-aware weighting as a loss-based reweighting scheme controlled by a temperature hyperparameter. Full details on baseline hyperparameters (tuned via grid search on validation data), error bars (reported from five independent runs with different seeds), and the train/validation/test splits (70/10/20 stratified by filing date) are already provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3; we will add an explicit cross-reference in the abstract directing readers to these sections for reproducibility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical results on external baselines and new benchmark

full rationale

The paper's central claims consist of empirical performance comparisons of NORA against external noisy-label baselines (Co-teaching, Mixup, SSR, SelfMix) on a newly constructed 6.6M-instance benchmark. Both unfiltered and NPK-filtered test settings are used, with NPK introduced as an evaluation aid rather than a training component. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce any reported metric (Accuracy, Macro F1, Weighted F1) to the paper's own inputs by construction. All methods are evaluated on identical splits, and the derivation chain contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or load-bearing self-citation steps. This is a standard empirical ML evaluation setup with no reduction to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters or axioms; standard ML assumptions about label noise models and benchmark representativeness are implicit but unstated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5796 in / 1119 out tokens · 32288 ms · 2026-06-30T11:44:50.799447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Manaf Al-Okaily, Hani Alkayed, and Aws Al-Okaily. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100228 Does xbrl adoption increase financial information transparency in digital disclosure environment? insights from emerging markets . International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1):100228

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100228 2024

  4. [4]

    S Chen, and Eileen Z Taylor

    Jon Bartley, Al Y. S Chen, and Eileen Z Taylor. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10028 A comparison of xbrl filings to corporate 10-ks—evidence from the voluntary filing program . Accounting Horizons, 25(2):227--245

    work page doi:10.2308/acch-10028 2011

  5. [5]

    White, Clinton E

    Kamile Asli Basoglu and Jr. White, Clinton E. (Skip). 2015. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51254 Inline xbrl versus xbrl for sec reporting . Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12(1):189--199

    work page doi:10.2308/jeta-51254 2015

  6. [6]

    Robertson

    Hyun Woong (Daniel) Chang, Steven Kaszak, Peter Kipp, and Jesse C. Robertson. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISYS-2020-011 The effect of ixbrl formatted financial statements on the effectiveness of managers' decisions when making inter-firm comparisons . Journal of Information Systems, 35(2):149--177

    work page doi:10.2308/isys-2020-011 2021

  7. [7]

    Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samples

    Yin Cui, Menglin Jia, Tsung - Yi Lin, Yang Song, and Serge J. Belongie. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05555 Class-balanced loss based on effective number of samples . CoRR, abs/1901.05555

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Matthijs Douze, Alexandr Guzhva, Chengqi Deng, Jeff Johnson, Gergely Szilvasy, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré, Maria Lomeli, Lucas Hosseini, and Hervé Jégou. 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08281 The faiss library . Preprint, arXiv:2401.08281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Vasarhelyi, and Xiaochuan Zheng

    Hui Du, Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, and Xiaochuan Zheng. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50399 Xbrl mandate: Thousands of filing errors and so what? Journal of Information Systems, 27(1):61--78

    work page doi:10.2308/isys-50399 2013

  10. [10]

    Chen Feng, Georgios Tzimiropoulos, and Ioannis Patras. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2024.3426994 Noisebox: Toward more efficient and effective learning with noisy labels . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 34(11):11914--11928

    work page doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3426994 2024

  11. [11]

    Ghislain Fourny. 2023. The XBRL Book: Simple, Precise, Technical. Amazon Digital Services LLC - KDP Print US

    2023

  12. [12]

    Bo Han, Quanming Yao, Xingrui Yu, Gang Niu, Miao Xu, Weihua Hu, Ivor Tsang, and Masashi Sugiyama. 2018. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/a19744e268754fb0148b017647355b7b-Paper.pdf Co-teaching: Robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31. Cur...

    2018

  13. [13]

    Huang, Hui Wang, and Yi Yang

    Allen H. Huang, Hui Wang, and Yi Yang. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12832 Finbert: A large language model for extracting information from financial text . Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2):806--841

    work page doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12832 2023

  14. [14]

    Subhendu Khatuya, Rajdeep Mukherjee, Akash Ghosh, Manjunath Hegde, Koustuv Dasgupta, Niloy Ganguly, Saptarshi Ghosh, and Pawan Goyal. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.410 Parameter-efficient instruction tuning of large language models for extreme financial numeral labelling . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Cha...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.410 2024

  15. [15]

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Dollár. 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02002 Focal loss for dense object detection . Preprint, arXiv:1708.02002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Lefteris Loukas, Manos Fergadiotis, Ilias Chalkidis, Eirini Spyropoulou, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Georgios Paliouras. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.303 F i NER : Financial numeric entity recognition for XBRL tagging . In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volum...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.303 2022

  17. [17]

    Xin Luo, Tawei Wang, Liu Yang, Xinlei Zhao, and Yiyang Zhang. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-2020-023 Initial evidence on the market impact of the ixbrl adoption . Accounting Horizons, 37(1):143--171

    work page doi:10.2308/horizons-2020-023 2023

  18. [18]

    Dan Qiao, Chenchen Dai, Yuyang Ding, Juntao Li, Qiang Chen, Wenliang Chen, and Min Zhang. 2022. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.80/ S elf M ix: Robust learning against textual label noise with self-mixup training . In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 960--970, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. Internat...

    2022

  19. [19]

    Soumya Sharma, Subhendu Khatuya, Manjunath Hegde, Afreen Shaikh, Koustuv Dasgupta, Pawan Goyal, and Niloy Ganguly. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.219 Financial numeric extreme labelling: A dataset and benchmarking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 3550--3561, Toronto, Canada. Association f...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.219 2023

  20. [20]

    Hwanjun Song, Minseok Kim, Dongmin Park, Yooju Shin, and Jae-Gil Lee. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3152527 Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(11):8135--8153

    work page doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3152527 2023

  21. [21]

    Ruxin Wang, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2699783 Multiclass learning with partially corrupted labels . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(6):2568--2580

    work page doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2699783 2018

  22. [22]

    Yi Yang, Mark Christopher Siy UY, and Allen Huang. 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08097 Finbert: A pretrained language model for financial communications . Preprint, arXiv:2006.08097

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization

    Hongyi Zhang, Moustapha Cisse, Yann N. Dauphin, and David Lopez-Paz. 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09412 mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization . Preprint, arXiv:1710.09412

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018