pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25141 · v1 · pith:NSO2WPPTnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

LLM Agent Based Renewable Energy Forecasting Using Edge and IoT Data A Review of Solar Wind Weather and Grid Aware Decision Support

Pavan Manjunath , Thomas Pruefer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords LLM agentsrenewable energy forecastingIoT and edge datasolar and windgrid aware decision supportuncertainty quantificationtaxonomy
0
0 comments X

The pith

LLM agents integrate IoT, weather, and grid data to enhance renewable energy forecasting workflows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how large language model agents might improve solar and wind energy forecasting by pulling together data from IoT devices, weather services, historical records, and grid rules. It notes that traditional methods fall short with the flood of real-time sensor data, and shows how LLM agents could add contextual reasoning and natural language explanations for operators. A six-layer structure is outlined for building these systems, along with twelve challenges such as handling data shifts and controlling incorrect outputs, plus suggestions for future work on shared test sets and models tied to physical laws.

Core claim

LLM agents can enhance renewable energy forecasting by integrating heterogeneous sensor streams, weather API data, historical generation records, grid constraints, and contextual reasoning into unified decision support workflows.

What carries the argument

A proposed six-layer taxonomy that organizes the workflow from data acquisition and preprocessing to model inference, uncertainty estimation, and natural language reporting.

If this is right

  • Unified workflows allow better handling of intermittent solar and wind output for grid stability.
  • The taxonomy guides development of agent systems that include explanation and uncertainty features.
  • Open challenges like model drift point to needs for ongoing adaptation mechanisms.
  • Recommendations for open benchmarks and federated architectures support collaborative research and deployment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Natural language outputs could help non-expert operators respond quicker to forecast changes.
  • Grounding agents in physics models of energy generation may reduce risks from incorrect reasoning.
  • Edge-based processing could lower latency for real-time grid decisions during high variability periods.

Load-bearing premise

Conventional forecasting pipelines are ill-equipped to exploit the volume of real-time operational data from IoT and edge devices, and LLM agents can overcome this without introducing unmanageable issues such as hallucination or model drift.

What would settle it

A side-by-side test on operational solar or wind data where an LLM agent system fails to match or exceed the accuracy and reliability of current hybrid forecasting methods, or where hallucinations lead to worse operational decisions.

read the original abstract

Reliable forecasting of renewable energy generation is a foundational requirement for grid stability energy trading battery scheduling and carbon aware operational planning Solar and wind resources are inherently intermittent their output fluctuates with cloud cover wind speed atmospheric turbulence seasonal patterns and local terrain The proliferation of IoT and edge devices spanning smart meters inverters anemometers pyranometers weather stations and grid interface sensors has created an unprecedented volume of real time operational data that conventional forecasting pipelines are ill equipped to exploit fully This review investigates how large language model LLM agents can enhance renewable energy forecasting by integrating heterogeneous sensor streams weather API data historical generation records grid constraints and contextual reasoning into unified decision support workflows We survey classical forecasting methods statistical time series models deep learning architectures physics hybrid approaches and emerging LLM agent frameworks for explanation uncertainty communication and operator guidance A six layer taxonomy is proposed covering data acquisition preprocessing feature engineering model inference uncertainty estimation and natural language reporting The review identifies twelve open challenges spanning real time deployment model drift under distribution shift uncertainty quantification hallucination control in LLM agents interoperability of edge hardware and integration with energy management systems The paper concludes by recommending a research agenda centred on open benchmarks physics informed LLM grounding and federated forecasting architectures

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a literature review surveying classical statistical, deep learning, physics-hybrid, and LLM-agent based methods for renewable energy forecasting. It proposes a six-layer taxonomy for integrating IoT/edge data streams with LLM agents for decision support in solar and wind energy contexts, identifies twelve open challenges including hallucination control and model drift, and recommends a research agenda on benchmarks, physics-informed grounding, and federated architectures.

Significance. The review organizes an emerging area at the intersection of large language models and renewable energy systems. The proposed taxonomy and explicit enumeration of challenges could provide a useful framework for researchers if they are grounded in a balanced survey of the literature. The paper's strength lies in highlighting integration issues rather than claiming solved problems. Its impact would be enhanced by more detailed mapping to specific prior works.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains several run-on sentences and missing punctuation, e.g., 'grid stability energy trading battery scheduling' should include commas for readability.
  2. [Abstract] The scope of the survey is described at a high level; consider adding a sentence on the number of papers reviewed or time period covered to give readers a sense of comprehensiveness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the point raised regarding mapping to prior works below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Its impact would be enhanced by more detailed mapping to specific prior works.

    Authors: We agree that more explicit linkages to individual prior works would strengthen the review. In the revised manuscript we will expand the literature survey sections to include additional specific citations and direct comparisons, explicitly mapping classical statistical models, deep learning architectures, and physics-hybrid methods to the LLM-agent frameworks and the proposed six-layer taxonomy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: literature review with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a literature survey that reviews existing methods, proposes a six-layer taxonomy, and enumerates twelve open challenges without any equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations. Its central claim is an investigation into how LLM agents might integrate data streams, not an assertion that they already achieve this without the issues the paper itself flags as unresolved. No self-citation chains, self-definitional steps, or fitted-input predictions appear in the text. The manuscript is self-contained as a review against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing internal reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; its content rests on the body of existing literature in renewable energy forecasting and AI.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1122 out tokens · 31798 ms · 2026-06-30T11:49:00.118982+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    World Energy Outlook 2024,

    International Energy Agency (IEA), “World Energy Outlook 2024,” IEA, Paris, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Wind power forecasting—A review of the state of the art,

    G. Giebel and G. Kariniotakis, “Wind power forecasting—A review of the state of the art,” inRenewable Energy Forecasting, Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 59–109

    2017

  3. [3]

    Lange and U

    M. Lange and U. Focken,Physical Approach to Short-Term Wind Power Prediction. Springer, Berlin, 2006

    2006

  4. [4]

    Assessment of forecasting techniques for solar power production with no exogenous inputs,

    H. T. C. Pedro and C. F. M. Coimbra, “Assessment of forecasting techniques for solar power production with no exogenous inputs,”Solar Energy, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 2017–2028, 2012

    2017

  5. [5]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,

    S. Yao et al., “ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,” inProc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Solar forecasting methods for renewable energy integration,

    R. H. Inman, H. T. C. Pedro, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “Solar forecasting methods for renewable energy integration,”Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 535–576, 2013

    2013

  8. [8]

    A review of wind power and wind speed forecasting methods with different time horizons,

    S. S. Soman, H. Zareipour, O. Malik, and P. Mandal, “A review of wind power and wind speed forecasting methods with different time horizons,” inProc. North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2010

    2010

  9. [9]

    J. M. Morales, A. J. Conejo, H. Madsen, P. Pinson, and M. Zugno, Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets. Springer, New York, 2013

    2013

  10. [10]

    SCADA data-based condition monitoring of wind turbines,

    M. Diaz et al., “SCADA data-based condition monitoring of wind turbines,”Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 1056, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    Edge computing: Vision and challenges,

    W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y . Li, and L. Xu, “Edge computing: Vision and challenges,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, 2016

    2016

  12. [12]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” inProc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models

    H. Touvron et al., “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB),

    M. Sengupta, Y . Xie, A. Lopez, A. Habte, G. Maclaurin, and J. Shelby, “The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB),”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 89, pp. 51–60, 2018

    2018

  15. [15]

    Intra-hour forecasting with a total sky imager at the UC San Diego solar energy testbed,

    C. W. Chow et al., “Intra-hour forecasting with a total sky imager at the UC San Diego solar energy testbed,”Solar Energy, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 2881–2893, 2011

    2011

  16. [16]

    History and trends in solar irradiance and PV power forecasting,

    D. Yang, J. Kleissl, C. A. Gueymard, H. T. Pedro, and C. F. Coimbra, “History and trends in solar irradiance and PV power forecasting,”Solar Energy, vol. 168, pp. 60–101, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars,

    E. Simley, N. Angelou, T. Mikkelsen, M. Sj ¨oholm, J. Mann, and L. Y . Pao, “Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars,”Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 013301, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    A comparison between the ECMWF and COSMO ensemble prediction systems applied to short- term wind power forecasting on real data,

    S. Alessandrini, S. Sperati, and P. Pinson, “A comparison between the ECMWF and COSMO ensemble prediction systems applied to short- term wind power forecasting on real data,”Applied Energy, vol. 107, pp. 271–280, 2013

    2013

  19. [19]

    Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid,

    S. D. Ramchurn, P. Vytelingum, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings, “Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid,”Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 86–97, 2012

    2012

  20. [20]

    G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, and G. M. Ljung,Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2015

    2015

  21. [21]

    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams,Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006

    2006

  22. [22]

    A weather-based hybrid method for 1-day ahead hourly forecasting of PV power output,

    H. T. Yang, C. M. Huang, Y . C. Huang, and Y . S. Pai, “A weather-based hybrid method for 1-day ahead hourly forecasting of PV power output,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 917–926, 2014

    2014

  23. [23]

    Accurate photovoltaic power forecasting models using deep LSTM-RNN,

    M. Abdel-Nasser and K. Mahmoud, “Accurate photovoltaic power forecasting models using deep LSTM-RNN,”Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 2727–2740, 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    A dual-stage attention-based recurrent neural network for time series prediction,

    Y . Qin, D. Song, H. Cheng, W. Cheng, G. Jiang, and G. W. Cottrell, “A dual-stage attention-based recurrent neural network for time series prediction,” inProc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence (IJCAI), 2017

    2017

  25. [25]

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long se- quence time-series forecasting,

    H. Zhou et al., “Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long se- quence time-series forecasting,” inProc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 11106–11115, 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers,

    Y . Nie, N. H. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, and J. Kalagnanam, “A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers,” inProc. ICLR, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    A comprehensive dataset for the accelerated development and benchmarking of solar forecasting methods,

    H. T. C. Pedro, D. H. Lim, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “A comprehensive dataset for the accelerated development and benchmarking of solar forecasting methods,”Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 036102, 2019

    2019

  28. [28]

    Unified training of universal time series forecasting transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02592, 2024

    G. Liu et al., “Moirai: A foundation model for time series forecasting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02592, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series

    A. Ansari et al., “Chronos: Learning the language of time series,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07815, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Leveraging large language models for automated energy audit report generation,

    Z. Liu, Y . Li, and W. Zhang, “Leveraging large language models for automated energy audit report generation,”Energy and Buildings, vol. 295, p. 113310, 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Wei et al., “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” inProc. NeurIPS, 2022

    2022

  32. [32]

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

    Y . Gao et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Review of photovoltaic power forecasting,

    J. Antonanzas et al., “Review of photovoltaic power forecasting,”Solar Energy, vol. 136, pp. 78–111, 2016

    2016

  34. [34]

    A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting,

    R. Ahmed et al., “A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting,”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 124, p. 109792, 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Interpretable temporal-spatial graph neural net- work for solar irradiance forecasting,

    J. Simeunovic et al., “Interpretable temporal-spatial graph neural net- work for solar irradiance forecasting,” inProc. IEEE SEST, 2021

    2021

  36. [36]

    Very-short-term probabilistic forecasting of wind power with generalized logit-normal distributions,

    P. Pinson, “Very-short-term probabilistic forecasting of wind power with generalized logit-normal distributions,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 555–576, 2012

    2012

  37. [37]

    Physics-informed neural networks for wind power forecasting,

    X. Chen, J. Zhang, and C. Xu, “Physics-informed neural networks for wind power forecasting,”IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 375–386, 2021

    2021

  38. [38]

    Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022,

    IRENA, “Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022,” IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2023

    2022

  39. [39]

    Machine learning methods for solar radiation fore- casting: A review,

    C. V oyant et al., “Machine learning methods for solar radiation fore- casting: A review,”Renewable Energy, vol. 105, pp. 569–582, 2017

    2017

  40. [40]

    Solar photovoltaic generation forecasting methods: A review,

    S. Sobri, S. Koohi-Kamali, and N. A. Rahim, “Solar photovoltaic generation forecasting methods: A review,”Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 156, pp. 459–497, 2018

    2018

  41. [41]

    Deep solar radiation forecasting with convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network algorithms,

    S. Ghimire et al., “Deep solar radiation forecasting with convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network algorithms,”Ap- plied Energy, vol. 253, p. 113541, 2019

    2019

  42. [42]

    A review of deep learning for renewable energy forecasting,

    H. Wang et al., “A review of deep learning for renewable energy forecasting,”Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 198, p. 111799, 2019

    2019

  43. [43]

    Electricity load forecasting using sequential models: A review,

    I. K. Nti et al., “Electricity load forecasting using sequential models: A review,”SAIEE Africa Research Journal, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 120–138, 2020

    2020

  44. [44]

    The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand,

    I. Staffell and S. Pfenninger, “The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand,”Energy, vol. 145, pp. 65–78, 2018

    2018

  45. [45]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y . Bengio, and A. Courville,Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016

    2016

  46. [46]

    Irradiance forecasting for the power prediction of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,

    E. Lorenz et al., “Irradiance forecasting for the power prediction of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2009

    2009

  47. [47]

    Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling,

    M. A. Hassan et al., “Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling,”Applied Energy, vol. 203, pp. 897–916, 2017

    2017

  48. [48]

    Digital twin-based monitoring and fault diagnosis for distributed photovoltaic systems,

    Y . Luo et al., “Digital twin-based monitoring and fault diagnosis for distributed photovoltaic systems,”Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 3418– 3428, 2023

    2023

  49. [49]

    Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models

    A. Zhou et al., “Language agent tree search unifies reasoning, acting, and planning in language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04406, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance

    S. Wu et al., “BloombergGPT: A large language model for finance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17564, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early exper- iments with GPT-4,

    S. Bubeck et al., “Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early exper- iments with GPT-4,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12528, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning

    F. Doshi-Velez and B. Kim, “Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017