pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27870 · v2 · pith:XVHYT36Snew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-th

Revisiting boundary electromagnetic duality and edge modes

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords electromagnetic dualityboundary conditionsedge modeslarge gauge transformationssurface chargesMaxwell theorytopological operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modified boundary conditions turn large gauge transformations into physical symmetries generated by topological surface operators in Maxwell theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines electric and magnetic surface charges and edge modes for four-dimensional Maxwell theory and QED on a spacetime with a finite spatial boundary. Using the S-wall construction that implements electromagnetic duality, it distinguishes cases where large gauge transformations and edge mode shifts are gauge redundancies from cases where they become physical. For standard Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions the transformations remain redundancies, while for modified boundary conditions they are generated by topological surface operators and the edge modes become physical. The paper also constructs new boundary conditions that serve as electromagnetic duals to the modified ones.

Core claim

For modified boundary conditions, large gauge transformations can become genuine physical boundary symmetries generated by topological surface operators, and the corresponding edge modes can become physical. New boundary conditions that are electromagnetic duals of the modified boundary conditions are constructed.

What carries the argument

The S-wall, which implements electromagnetic duality to clarify the dual structure of surface charges and distinguish redundancies from physical symmetries.

If this is right

  • For standard Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions, large gauge transformations and shifts of edge modes remain gauge redundancies.
  • Singular large gauge transformations can be interpreted as insertions of Wilson or 't Hooft loops on the boundary.
  • Electromagnetic dual versions of the modified boundary conditions exist and can be constructed explicitly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same distinction between redundant and physical symmetries may apply when extending the analysis to include charged matter fields in QED.
  • The construction of dual boundary conditions suggests a systematic way to pair boundary conditions across electric-magnetic duality.

Load-bearing premise

The S-wall correctly implements electromagnetic duality, allowing the distinction between gauge redundancies and physical boundary symmetries for both standard and modified boundary conditions.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the commutators or action of the generators associated with large gauge transformations under the modified boundary conditions, checking whether they produce non-vanishing physical effects on the edge modes.

read the original abstract

We revisit electric and magnetic surface charges and edge modes in four-dimensional Maxwell theory and QED on a spacetime with a finite spatial boundary. Using the S-wall, which implements electromagnetic duality, we clarify the dual structure of surface charges. We show that, for the standard Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions, large gauge transformations and the corresponding shifts of edge modes are gauge redundancies rather than physical boundary symmetries. We also consider singular large gauge transformations and interpret them as insertions of Wilson or 't Hooft loops on the boundary. For modified boundary conditions, we show that large gauge transformations can become genuine physical boundary symmetries generated by topological surface operators, and that the corresponding edge modes can become physical. We further construct new boundary conditions that are electromagnetic duals of the modified boundary conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits electric and magnetic surface charges and edge modes in four-dimensional Maxwell theory and QED on spacetimes with finite spatial boundaries. It employs the S-wall to implement electromagnetic duality and clarify the dual structure of surface charges. For standard Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions, large gauge transformations (including singular ones interpreted as Wilson or 't Hooft loop insertions) and associated edge-mode shifts are argued to be gauge redundancies. For modified boundary conditions, the paper claims that large gauge transformations become genuine physical boundary symmetries generated by topological surface operators, rendering the corresponding edge modes physical, and constructs new boundary conditions that are electromagnetic duals of the modified ones.

Significance. If the S-wall analysis is robust, the work would provide a useful clarification of when boundary symmetries are physical versus redundant in gauge theories, with potential implications for edge-mode dynamics and duality in the presence of boundaries. The explicit construction of dual boundary conditions for the modified case is a concrete contribution that could be checked against existing literature on boundary conditions in QED.

major comments (2)
  1. [S-wall analysis (invoked for both standard and modified boundary conditions)] The central distinction between redundancies and physical symmetries for modified boundary conditions rests on the S-wall correctly mapping surface charges without implicitly assuming vanishing or total-derivative surface terms that the modified conditions alter. The abstract invokes this mapping uniformly, but an explicit derivation or phase-space check confirming the S-wall action remains valid under the modified conditions is required to support the claim that large gauge transformations become generated by topological surface operators.
  2. [Section constructing new boundary conditions] The construction of new electromagnetic dual boundary conditions (claimed to be duals of the modified ones) needs to include a verification that the physicality of the symmetries and edge modes is preserved under the duality map, or at minimum an explicit statement of how the S-wall acts on these new conditions to avoid circularity in the duality argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for electric versus magnetic surface charges and edge modes should be introduced with explicit definitions and a summary table early in the manuscript to improve readability.
  2. The discussion of singular large gauge transformations as Wilson/'t Hooft loop insertions would benefit from a brief comparison to existing treatments of loop operators on boundaries in the literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point-by-point below. Revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation of the S-wall analysis and the dual boundary conditions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [S-wall analysis (invoked for both standard and modified boundary conditions)] The central distinction between redundancies and physical symmetries for modified boundary conditions rests on the S-wall correctly mapping surface charges without implicitly assuming vanishing or total-derivative surface terms that the modified conditions alter. The abstract invokes this mapping uniformly, but an explicit derivation or phase-space check confirming the S-wall action remains valid under the modified conditions is required to support the claim that large gauge transformations become generated by topological surface operators.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is valuable for rigor. In the revised manuscript we have added a phase-space derivation (new subsection in Section 3) confirming that the S-wall continues to map the surface charges correctly under the modified boundary conditions. The modifications do not generate additional non-topological surface terms; the duality map remains valid because the relevant operators stay topological, so the distinction between redundancies and physical symmetries is preserved. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section constructing new boundary conditions] The construction of new electromagnetic dual boundary conditions (claimed to be duals of the modified ones) needs to include a verification that the physicality of the symmetries and edge modes is preserved under the duality map, or at minimum an explicit statement of how the S-wall acts on these new conditions to avoid circularity in the duality argument.

    Authors: We have expanded the relevant section to include an explicit statement of the S-wall action on the newly constructed dual boundary conditions. This shows that the physicality of the symmetries and edge modes is preserved under the map, with no circularity introduced because the topological character of the generating operators is maintained by construction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; S-wall duality treated as external input

full rationale

The paper invokes the S-wall to implement electromagnetic duality and distinguish redundancies from physical symmetries under standard and modified boundary conditions. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or physicality conclusion to a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as output, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation analyzes how large gauge transformations and edge modes behave under different boundary conditions, with the S-wall serving as an independent tool rather than an ansatz or result derived within the paper itself. This is the common case of a self-contained analysis against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of 4D Maxwell theory, electromagnetic duality, and the interpretation of boundary conditions; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Maxwell equations and electromagnetic duality hold in 4D spacetime with boundary
    Foundation for analyzing surface charges and edge modes.
  • domain assumption S-wall implements electromagnetic duality to relate electric and magnetic structures
    Used to clarify dual structure of surface charges for both standard and modified boundary conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5649 in / 1327 out tokens · 35934 ms · 2026-06-29T11:42:49.942025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · 56 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim,Improved Hamiltonian for general relativity,Phys. Lett. B53(1974) 101

  2. [2]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim,Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity,Annals Phys.88(1974) 286

  3. [3]

    Gervais, B

    J. Gervais, B. Sakita and S. Wadia,The Surface Term in Gauge Theories,Phys. Lett. B63(1976) 55

  4. [4]

    Wadia and T

    S. Wadia and T. Yoneya,The Role of Surface Variables in the Vacuum Structure of Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Lett. B66(1977) 341

  5. [5]

    Wadia,Hamiltonian Formulation of Nonabelian Gauge Theory with Surface Terms: Applications to the Dyon Solution,Phys

    S.R. Wadia,Hamiltonian Formulation of Nonabelian Gauge Theory with Surface Terms: Applications to the Dyon Solution,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 3615

  6. [6]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

  7. [7]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121(1989) 351

  8. [8]

    Bos and V.P

    M. Bos and V.P. Nair,Coherent State Quantization of Chern-Simons Theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 959

  9. [9]

    Elitzur, G.W

    S. Elitzur, G.W. Moore, A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg,Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,Nucl. Phys. B326(1989) 108

  10. [10]

    A.P.Balachandran,G.Bimonte,K.S.GuptaandA.Stern,ConformaledgecurrentsinChern-Simons theories,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7(1992) 4655 [hep-th/9110072]

  11. [11]

    Edge States in Gauge Theories: Theory, Interpretations and Predictions

    A.P. Balachandran, L. Chandar and E. Ercolessi,Edge states in gauge theories: Theory, interpretations and predictions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10(1995) 1969 [hep-th/9411164]

  12. [12]

    Edge states in Gravity and Black Hole Physics

    A.P. Balachandran, L. Chandar and A. Momen,Edge states in gravity and black hole physics,Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 581 [gr-qc/9412019]

  13. [13]

    Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes

    W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall,Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes,Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(2015) 111603 [1412.1895]

  14. [14]

    Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field

    W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall,Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104053 [1506.05792]

  15. [15]

    David and J

    J.R. David and J. Mukherjee,Entanglement entropy of gravitational edge modes,JHEP08(2022) 065 [2201.06043]

  16. [16]

    Ball, Y.T.A

    A. Ball, Y.T.A. Law and G. Wong,Dynamical edge modes and entanglement in Maxwell theory, JHEP09(2024) 032 [2403.14542]

  17. [17]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel,Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,JHEP09(2016) 102 [1601.04744]

  18. [18]

    Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories

    A.J. Speranza,Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories,JHEP02 (2018) 021 [1706.05061]

  19. [19]

    Spontaneous Lorentz Violation in Gauge Theories

    A.P. Balachandran and S. Vaidya,Spontaneous Lorentz Violation in Gauge Theories,Eur. Phys. J. Plus128(2013) 118 [1302.3406]. – 27 –

  20. [20]

    Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory

    A. Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP07(2014) 151 [1308.0589]

  21. [21]

    On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering

    A. Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

  22. [22]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,JHEP05(2015) 151 [1401.7026]

  23. [23]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger,Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,1404.4091

  24. [24]

    Asymptotic symmetries and subleading soft graviton theorem

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries and subleading soft graviton theorem,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 124028 [1408.2228]

  25. [25]

    T. He, P. Mitra, A.P. Porfyriadis and A. Strominger,New Symmetries of Massless QED,JHEP10 (2014) 112 [1407.3789]

  26. [26]

    Semiclassical Virasoro Symmetry of the Quantum Gravity S-Matrix

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger,Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravityS-matrix,JHEP08(2014) 058 [1406.3312]

  27. [27]

    Low's Subleading Soft Theorem as a Symmetry of QED

    V. Lysov, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger,Low’s Subleading Soft Theorem as a Symmetry of QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 111601 [1407.3814]

  28. [28]

    Soft theorems in maximally supersymmetric theories

    Z.-W. Liu,Soft theorems in maximally supersymmetric theories,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 105 [1410.1616]

  29. [29]

    Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,JHEP01(2016) 086 [1411.5745]

  30. [30]

    Asymptotic Symmetries of Massless QED in Even Dimensions

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov and A. Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Massless QED in Even Dimensions,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1747 [1412.2763]

  31. [31]

    Soft Theorems from Effective Field Theory

    A.J. Larkoski, D. Neill and I.W. Stewart,Soft Theorems from Effective Field Theory,JHEP06 (2015) 077 [1412.3108]

  32. [32]

    Higher-Dimensional Supertranslations and Weinberg's Soft Graviton Theorem

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger,Higher-dimensional supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,Ann. Math. Sci. Appl.02(2017) 69 [1502.07644]

  33. [33]

    T. He, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,2D Kac-Moody Symmetry of 4D Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP10 (2016) 137 [1503.02663]

  34. [34]

    Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg's soft photon theorem

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem, JHEP07(2015) 115 [1505.05346]

  35. [35]

    New Symmetries of QED

    D. Kapec, M. Pate and A. Strominger,New Symmetries of QED,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1769 [1506.02906]

  36. [36]

    Asymptotic symmetries of gravity and soft theorems for massive particles

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries of gravity and soft theorems for massive particles,JHEP12(2015) 094 [1509.01406]

  37. [37]

    New Gravitational Memories

    S. Pasterski, A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov,New Gravitational Memories,JHEP12(2016) 053 [1502.06120]

  38. [38]

    Dumitrescu, T

    T.T. Dumitrescu, T. He, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,Infinite-dimensional fermionic symmetry in supersymmetric gauge theories,JHEP08(2021) 051 [1511.07429]

  39. [39]

    Magnetic Corrections to the Soft Photon Theorem

    A. Strominger,Magnetic Corrections to the Soft Photon Theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 031602 [1509.00543]

  40. [40]

    Subleading soft photons and large gauge transformations

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Subleading soft photons and large gauge transformations,JHEP11 (2016) 012 [1605.09677]

  41. [41]

    Shaving off Black Hole Soft Hair

    M. Mirbabayi and M. Porrati,Dressed Hard States and Black Hole Soft Hair,Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 211301 [1607.03120]. – 28 –

  42. [42]

    Large Gauge Symmetries and Asymptotic States in QED

    B. Gabai and A. Sever,Large gauge symmetries and asymptotic states in QED,JHEP12(2016) 095 [1607.08599]

  43. [43]

    Can scalars have asymptotic symmetries?

    M. Campiglia, L. Coito and S. Mizera,Can scalars have asymptotic symmetries?,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 046002 [1703.07885]

  44. [44]

    Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited

    D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.-M. Raclariu and A. Strominger,Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 085002 [1705.04311]

  45. [45]

    Soft pion theorem, asymptotic symmetry and new memory effect

    Y. Hamada and S. Sugishita,Soft pion theorem, asymptotic symmetry and new memory effect,JHEP 11(2017) 203 [1709.05018]

  46. [46]

    Gravitational Memory in Higher Dimensions

    M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu and A. Strominger,Gravitational Memory in Higher Dimensions,JHEP06 (2018) 138 [1712.01204]

  47. [47]

    Notes on the gravitational, electromagnetic and axion memory effects

    Y. Hamada and S. Sugishita,Notes on the gravitational, electromagnetic and axion memory effects, JHEP07(2018) 017 [1803.00738]

  48. [48]

    On the need for soft dressing

    D. Carney, L. Chaurette, D. Neuenfeld and G. Semenoff,On the need for soft dressing,JHEP09 (2018) 121 [1803.02370]

  49. [49]

    H.HiraiandS.Sugishita,ConservationLawsfromAsymptoticSymmetryandSubleadingChargesin QED,JHEP07(2018) 122 [1805.05651]

  50. [50]

    Soft Charges and Electric-Magnetic Duality

    V. Hosseinzadeh, A. Seraj and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Soft Charges and Electric-Magnetic Duality, JHEP08(2018) 102 [1806.01901]

  51. [51]

    Scalar Asymptotic Charges and Dual Large Gauge Transformations

    M. Campiglia, L. Freidel, F. Hopfmueller and R.M. Soni,Scalar Asymptotic Charges and Dual Large Gauge Transformations,JHEP04(2019) 003 [1810.04213]

  52. [52]

    Two-Form Asymptotic Symmetries and Scalar Soft Theorems

    D. Francia and C. Heissenberg,Two-Form Asymptotic Symmetries and Scalar Soft Theorems,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 105003 [1810.05634]

  53. [53]

    Neuenfeld,Infrared-safe scattering without photon vacuum transitions and time-dependent decoherence,JHEP11(2021) 189 [1810.11477]

    D. Neuenfeld,Infrared-safe scattering without photon vacuum transitions and time-dependent decoherence,JHEP11(2021) 189 [1810.11477]

  54. [54]

    Asymptotic structure of a massless scalar field and its dual two-form field at spatial infinity

    M. Henneaux and C. Troessaert,Asymptotic structure of a massless scalar field and its dual two-form field at spatial infinity,JHEP05(2019) 147 [1812.07445]

  55. [55]

    Dressed states from gauge invariance

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,Dressed states from gauge invariance,JHEP06(2019) 023 [1901.09935]

  56. [56]

    Gonzo, T

    R. Gonzo, T. Mc Loughlin, D. Medrano and A. Spiering,Asymptotic charges and coherent states in QCD,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 025019 [1906.11763]

  57. [57]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,Subleading soft dressings of asymptotic states in QED and perturbative quantum gravity,JHEP09(2019) 031 [1907.05438]

  58. [58]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,Magnetic soft charges, dual supertranslations, and ’t Hooft line dressings, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 025001 [1912.02224]

  59. [59]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Troessaert,A note on electric-magnetic duality and soft charges,JHEP06 (2020) 081 [2004.05668]

  60. [60]

    Hirai and S

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,IR finite S-matrix by gauge invariant dressed states,JHEP02(2021) 025 [2009.11716]

  61. [61]

    Campiglia and J

    M. Campiglia and J. Peraza,Charge algebra for non-abelian large gauge symmetries at O(r),JHEP 12(2021) 058 [2111.00973]. – 29 –

  62. [62]

    Hirai and S

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,Dress code for infrared safe scattering in QED,PTEP2023(2023) 053B04 [2209.00608]

  63. [63]

    Nagy and J

    S. Nagy and J. Peraza,Radiative phase space extensions at all orders in r for self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity,JHEP02(2023) 202 [2211.12991]

  64. [64]

    Peraza,Renormalized electric and magnetic charges for O(rn) large gauge symmetries,JHEP01 (2024) 175 [2301.05671]

    J. Peraza,Renormalized electric and magnetic charges for O(rn) large gauge symmetries,JHEP01 (2024) 175 [2301.05671]

  65. [65]

    S. Nagy, J. Peraza and G. Pizzolo,Infinite-dimensional hierarchy of recursive extensions for all subn-leading soft effects in Yang-Mills,JHEP12(2024) 068 [2407.13556]

  66. [66]

    Asymptotic charges as detectors and the memory effect in massive QED and perturbative quantum gravity

    B. Oertel, I. Moult and S. Pasterski,Asymptotic charges as detectors and the memory effect in massive QED and perturbative quantum gravity,2604.19866

  67. [67]

    Finite-time memory detectors and fully constraining Faddeev-Kulish dressings in QED and gravity

    B. Oertel,Finite-time memory detectors and fully constraining Faddeev-Kulish dressings in QED and gravity,2605.06774

  68. [68]

    Shimizu and S

    K. Shimizu and S. Sugishita,Asymptotic symmetry and confinement in three-dimensional QED, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 105001 [2503.20173]

  69. [69]

    Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

  70. [70]

    Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 085006 [1706.03917]

  71. [71]

    S-matrix singularities and CFT correlation functions

    C. Cardona and Y.-t. Huang,S-matrix singularities and CFT correlation functions,JHEP08(2017) 133 [1702.03283]

  72. [72]

    A Conformal Basis for Flat Space Amplitudes

    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065022 [1705.01027]

  73. [73]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu and A. Strominger,Celestial amplitudes from UV to IR, JHEP08(2021) 062 [2012.04208]

  74. [74]

    Donnay, S

    L. Donnay, S. Pasterski and A. Puhm,Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT,JHEP09(2020) 176 [2005.08990]

  75. [75]

    Lectures on Celestial Holography,

    A.-M. Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography,2107.02075

  76. [76]

    Lectures on celestial amplitudes,

    S. Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1062 [2108.04801]

  77. [77]

    Iacobacci, C

    L. Iacobacci, C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From celestial correlators to AdS, and back,JHEP06 (2023) 053 [2208.01629]

  78. [78]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Celestial Holography Revisited,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 241601 [2301.01810]

  79. [79]

    Hao and M

    Z. Hao and M. Taylor,Flat holography and celestial shockwaves,JHEP02(2024) 090 [2309.04307]

  80. [80]

    Furugori, N

    H. Furugori, N. Ogawa, S. Sugishita and T. Waki,Celestial two-point functions and rectified dictionary,JHEP02(2024) 063 [2312.07057]

Showing first 80 references.