pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29623 · v1 · pith:5PGHDJSMnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

MAMMOTH-Grism: Gas-phase Metallicity Gradients of Star-forming Galaxies in Protocluster Environments at Cosmic Noon

Yi-Ming Yang , Xin Wang , Chao-Wei Tsai , Zihao Li , Zheng Cai , Anahita Alavi , Fuyan Bian , James Colbert
show 6 more authors
Xiaohui Fan Alaina L. Henry Matthew A. Malkan Dong Dong Shi Harry I. Teplitz Xian Zhong Zheng
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords protoclustersmetallicity gradientsstar-forming galaxiescosmic noonenvironmental effectsgas inflowsHST grism spectroscopygalaxy chemical evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Protocluster galaxies at z~2.3 show inverted metallicity gradients far more often than field galaxies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures radial metal distributions in 42 star-forming galaxies inside three massive protoclusters at redshift around 2.3 using space-telescope spectra. It reports that 29 of them, or about 69 percent, have metallicity that rises outward from the center, a pattern seen much less often in galaxies of similar mass outside clusters. The inverted gradients appear most clearly in galaxies that sit below the usual mass-metallicity line, especially the more massive ones. The authors interpret this as evidence that the dense surroundings pull in extra metal-poor gas that reaches the galaxy centers and lowers their metal content. If the pattern holds, it shows that a galaxy's location inside a forming cluster can change how its internal chemistry builds up at the height of cosmic star formation.

Core claim

Spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity gradients for 42 star-forming galaxies in three massive protoclusters at z ∼ 2.3, derived from HST slitless grism spectroscopy, show that the majority (29 of 42, ∼69%) exhibit positive (inverted) metallicity gradients, a fraction significantly higher than observed in field galaxies of similar mass and redshift. These positive gradients correlate strongly with galaxies that are metal-deficient relative to the field mass-metallicity relation, particularly among the massive population. The trends indicate that galaxies in dense protocluster environments experience substantial enhanced inflows of pristine gas toward their central regions that dilute centr

What carries the argument

Spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity gradients from HST slitless grism spectroscopy, used to map how metal abundance changes with galactic radius.

If this is right

  • Protocluster environments drive enhanced inflows of pristine gas that dilute central metallicities and create inverted gradients.
  • The association between inverted gradients and metal-deficient galaxies is strongest among the more massive protocluster members.
  • Environmental effects actively regulate gas accretion and chemical redistribution inside galaxies during the peak epoch of cosmic star formation.
  • The overall fraction of inverted gradients reaches about 69 percent in these protoclusters, well above field rates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical models of galaxy growth may need to increase the efficiency of central pristine-gas delivery inside overdensities to match the observed gradient statistics.
  • The same environmental gas flows could alter the timing or mode of quenching in protocluster galaxies relative to the field.
  • Higher-resolution follow-up spectra could test whether the reported gradient slopes remain stable when measured with different techniques.

Load-bearing premise

Grism spectroscopy yields unbiased spatially resolved metallicity gradients and the protocluster sample can be compared fairly to field galaxies at matching mass and redshift without major selection or measurement differences.

What would settle it

A larger or independent survey finding that the fraction of positive metallicity gradients is not significantly higher in protoclusters than in matched field galaxies at the same redshift and mass would falsify the claimed environmental difference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29623 by Alaina L. Henry, Anahita Alavi, Chao-Wei Tsai, Dong Dong Shi, Fuyan Bian, Harry I. Teplitz, James Colbert, Matthew A. Malkan, Xian Zhong Zheng, Xiaohui Fan, Xin Wang, Yi-Ming Yang, Zheng Cai, Zihao Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of spatially resolved metallicity measurements of the protocluster member galaxy ID3495 at z ∼ 2.3. The top row, from left to right, shows the F160W image cutout, Voronoi binned 2D metallicity map, and the linear fit to the metallicity gradient. The lower row displays the [Oiii], [Oii], Hβ, Hγ emission-line maps from left to right. In the F160W image cutout, the metallicity map, and the emission-li… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of metallicity gradients (in dex kpc−1 ) as a function of redshift and cosmic time. We present measurements for our sample of N = 42 protocluster members at z ∼ 2.3, shown as red ’x’ symbols with 1σ error bars. The horizontal dashed line indicates a flat gradient (∇rZ = 0). Literature observations are plotted as various colored symbols; for studies with large samples (N > 20), we show the data ra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Metallicity gradient as a function of stellar mass. Our protocluster measurements at z ∼ 2.3 are shown as red dots, with red contours indicating the number density of the sample. The horizontal dashed line marks a flat gradient (∇rZ = 0). We compare against field galaxy samples (1.7 < z < 2.4) shown as colored symbols (Schreiber et al. 2018; Li et al. 2025) and the hatched gray region representing th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Metallicity gradient as a function of local galaxy overdensity δg. Right: Metallicity gradient as a function of integrated gas-phase metallicity (12 + log(O/H)). In both panels, data points are color-coded by stellar mass (log(M∗/M⊙)), and error bars represent 1σ measurement uncertainties. The horizontal dashed line indicates a flat gradient (∇rZ = 0). We do not observe a clear dependence of the grad… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Metallicity gradient (∆ log(O/H)/∆r) as a function of the metallicity offset (∆Z) from the field mass-metallicity relation at z ∼ 2.3. To highlight the mass dependence, the sample is divided by a stellar mass threshold of log(M∗/M⊙) = 9.95. Galaxies above this threshold are color-coded by stellar mass, while lower-mass galaxies are shown as gray points. The inset histogram displays the stellar mass distrib… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Environment plays a crucial role in shaping galaxy formation, yet the impact of overdensities on the internal chemical structure of galaxies at cosmic noon is still under debate. Here, we present spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity gradients for 42 star-forming galaxies in three massive protoclusters at $z \sim 2.3$, derived fromHubble Space Telescope (HST) slitless grism spectroscopy from the MAMMOTH-Grism survey. We find that the majority (29 of 42, $\sim$69%) of these protocluster members exhibit positive (inverted) metallicity gradients, a fraction significantly higher than observed in field galaxies of similar mass and redshift. By examining correlations with global properties, we show that these positive gradients are strongly associated with galaxies that are metal-deficient relative to the field mass-metallicity relation, particularly among the massive population ($\log(M_*/M_\odot) > 9.95$). These trends suggest that galaxies in dense protocluster environments experience substantial, enhanced inflows of pristine gas toward their central regions, which dilute the central metallicity and produce the observed inverted gradients. Our results provide observational evidence that environmental effects actively regulate gas accretion and chemical redistribution during the peak epoch of cosmic star formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper measures spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity gradients for 42 star-forming galaxies in three massive protoclusters at z~2.3 using HST slitless grism spectroscopy from the MAMMOTH-Grism survey. It reports that 29/42 (~69%) show positive (inverted) gradients, a significantly higher fraction than in field galaxies of similar mass and redshift; these inverted gradients correlate with galaxies lying below the field mass-metallicity relation (especially at log(M*/M⊙)>9.95), which the authors interpret as evidence for enhanced pristine-gas inflows diluting central metallicities in dense environments.

Significance. If robust, the result supplies direct observational evidence that protocluster environments at cosmic noon actively regulate gas accretion and chemical redistribution, extending field-galaxy studies to overdense regions during the peak of cosmic star formation. The sample size (42 galaxies) and uniform grism dataset are strengths that enable a statistical contrast with field populations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Data reduction and gradient measurement section] The central claim (69% positive gradients and the environmental contrast) rests on the accuracy of 2D metallicity maps extracted from slitless grism spectra. The data-analysis section does not report forward-modeling of mock galaxies with known input gradients through the full grism pipeline (including PSF convolution, wavelength-dependent dispersion, continuum subtraction, and neighbor contamination) to quantify residual bias in the sign or magnitude of the measured gradients.
  2. [Results and comparison to field galaxies] The comparison to field samples requires explicit demonstration that gradient measurements are performed identically and that selection effects (mass, SFR, redshift, and completeness) are matched. Without a table or figure showing the field sample properties and measurement methodology side-by-side with the protocluster sample, it is unclear whether the reported fraction difference could arise from systematic differences in how gradients are derived.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the 29/42 fraction but does not quote typical gradient slopes, uncertainties, or the statistical test used to claim the fraction is 'significantly higher' than the field; adding these numbers would improve clarity.
  2. [Methods] Notation for metallicity (e.g., 12+log(O/H) or Z/Z⊙) and the exact radial range over which gradients are fitted should be stated consistently in the methods and results sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the opportunity to improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below, agreeing that additional validation and explicit comparisons will strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data reduction and gradient measurement section] The central claim (69% positive gradients and the environmental contrast) rests on the accuracy of 2D metallicity maps extracted from slitless grism spectra. The data-analysis section does not report forward-modeling of mock galaxies with known input gradients through the full grism pipeline (including PSF convolution, wavelength-dependent dispersion, continuum subtraction, and neighbor contamination) to quantify residual bias in the sign or magnitude of the measured gradients.

    Authors: We agree that forward-modeling through the full pipeline is the most direct way to quantify any residual bias in gradient sign or magnitude. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix presenting mock galaxies with known input gradients that are injected into the real grism frames, processed through the identical reduction steps (PSF convolution, dispersion, continuum subtraction, and neighbor masking), and recovered with the same metallicity mapping code. This will demonstrate that the sign of the gradients is reliably recovered with only small systematic offsets in magnitude. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and comparison to field galaxies] The comparison to field samples requires explicit demonstration that gradient measurements are performed identically and that selection effects (mass, SFR, redshift, and completeness) are matched. Without a table or figure showing the field sample properties and measurement methodology side-by-side with the protocluster sample, it is unclear whether the reported fraction difference could arise from systematic differences in how gradients are derived.

    Authors: We will add a new table (and supporting text) that lists the stellar-mass, SFR, and redshift distributions of the protocluster sample alongside the field comparison samples, together with a concise statement that the gradient extraction pipeline, metallicity calibration, and spatial binning choices are identical to those used in the cited field studies. This will make the selection matching and methodological equivalence explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational count from grism spectra

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical fraction (29/42 galaxies with positive gradients) derived from HST slitless grism spectroscopy. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive this fraction; it is a direct measurement and comparison to field samples. The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of grism-based metallicity derivation and fair field comparison; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption HST slitless grism spectroscopy yields reliable spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity gradients for star-forming galaxies at z~2.3
    Invoked when deriving the reported gradients and comparing fractions.
  • domain assumption The protocluster sample selection and field comparison sample are matched in mass and redshift without significant bias
    Required for the claim that the 69% fraction is significantly higher.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5816 in / 1254 out tokens · 26769 ms · 2026-06-29T06:38:51.737274+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx789

    Belfiore, F., Maiolino, R., Tremonti, C., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx789

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx789 2017

  2. [2]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  3. [3]

    J., & Dopita, M

    Bian, F., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2018, ApJ, 859, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74 2018

  4. [4]

    2019, Grizli: Grism redshift and line analysis software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1905.001

    Brammer, G. 2019, Grizli: Grism redshift and line analysis software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1905.001. http://ascl.net/1905.001

    2019

  5. [5]

    2021, gbrammer/grizli: Release 2021, 1.3.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5012699

    Brammer, G., & Matharu, J. 2021, gbrammer/grizli: Release 2021, 1.3.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5012699

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5012699 2021

  6. [6]

    J., & Zanotti, O

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  7. [7]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 833, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/135

    Cai, Z., Fan, X., Peirani, S., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 833, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/135

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/135 2016

  8. [8]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d14

    Cai, Z., Fan, X., Yang, Y ., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d14 2017

  9. [9]

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-Forming Galaxies

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  10. [10]

    J., & Zanotti, O

    Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y . 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x 2003

  11. [11]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2169 2018

  12. [12]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 4293, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1343

    Carton, D., Brinchmann, J., Contini, T., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 4293, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1343

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1343 2018

  13. [13]

    2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  14. [14]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 844, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7e7b

    Chiang, Y .-K., Overzier, R., & Gebhardt, K. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 844, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7e7b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7e7b 2017

  15. [15]

    L., Aird, J., Reddy, N., et al

    Coil, A. L., Aird, J., Reddy, N., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/35 2015

  16. [16]

    2010, Nature, 467, 811, doi: 10.1038/nature09451

    Cresci, G., Mannucci, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2010, Nature, 467, 811, doi: 10.1038/nature09451

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09451 2010

  17. [17]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3379

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Cirasuolo, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3379

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3379 2020

  18. [18]

    2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 544, 2365, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1772

    Daikuhara, K., Kodama, T., Kusakabe, H., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 544, 2365, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1772

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1772 2025

  19. [19]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 1930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2482

    El-Badry, K., Quataert, E., Wetzel, A., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 1930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2482

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2482 2018

  20. [20]

    2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Conley, A., Meierjurgen Farr, W., et al. 2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002

    2013

  21. [21]

    2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 554, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321239

    Bailin, J. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 554, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321239

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321239 2013

  22. [22]

    S., Torrey, P., Qi, J., et al

    Hemler, Z. S., Torrey, P., Qi, J., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 3024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1803

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1803 2021

  23. [23]

    T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L

    Ho, I. T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 2030, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv067

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv067 2015

  24. [24]

    2010, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 725, L176, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/L176

    Jones, T., Ellis, R., Jullo, E., & Richard, J. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 725, L176, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/L176

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/l176 2010

  25. [25]

    S., Richard, J., & Jullo, E

    Jones, T., Ellis, R. S., Richard, J., & Jullo, E. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 765, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/48

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/1/48 2013

  26. [26]

    B., et al

    Jones, T., Wang, X., Schmidt, K. B., et al. 2015, The Astronomical Journal, 149, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/3/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/3/107 2015

  27. [27]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 978, L39, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada150

    Ju, M., Wang, X., Jones, T., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 978, L39, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada150

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ada150 2025

  28. [28]

    M., & Salim, S

    Juneau, S., Dickinson, M., Alexander, D. M., & Salim, S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/104 2011

  29. [29]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/88

    Juneau, S., Bournaud, F., Charlot, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/88

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/88 2014

  30. [30]

    A., Ellis, R

    Leethochawalit, N., Jones, T. A., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 84, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/84

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/84 2016

  31. [31]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 929, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac626f

    Li, Z., Wang, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 929, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac626f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac626f 2022

  32. [32]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 280, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adfa70

    Li, Z., Cai, Z., Wang, X., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 280, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adfa70

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adfa70 2025

  33. [33]

    2011, The Astronomical Journal, 142, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51

    Graczyk, D. 2011, The Astronomical Journal, 142, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51 2011

  34. [34]

    F., Feldmann, R., et al

    Ma, X., Hopkins, P. F., Feldmann, R., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 4780, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx034

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx034 2017

  35. [35]

    2019, A&A Rv, 27, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2

    Maiolino, R., & Mannucci, F. 2019, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 27, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 2019

  36. [36]

    2016, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    Merlin, E., Bourne, N., Castellano, M., et al. 2016, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628751 2016

  37. [37]

    M., et al

    Molina, J., Ibar, E., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 892, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3120

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3120 2017

  38. [38]

    D., Piro, A

    Oppenheimer, B. D., & Davé, R. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 387, 577, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13280.x Patrício, V ., Richard, J., Carton, D., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 489, 224, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2114

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13280.x 2008

  39. [39]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y ., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 124, 266, doi: 10.1086/340952

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/340952 2002

  40. [40]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 3643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1288 Gas-phaseMetallicityGradients inProtoclusters atz∼2 11

    Peng, Y .-j., & Maiolino, R. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1288 Gas-phaseMetallicityGradients inProtoclusters atz∼2 11

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1288 2014

  41. [41]

    2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117718

    Queyrel, J., Contini, T., Kissler-Patig, M., et al. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117718

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117718 2012

  42. [42]

    Rupke, D. S. N., Kewley, L. J., & Barnes, J. E. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 710, L156, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/710/2/L156 Sánchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Iglesias-Páramo, J., et al. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 563, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322343

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/710/2/l156 2010

  43. [43]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Jones, T., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 914, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf4c1 2021

  44. [44]

    Schreiber, N. M. F., Renzini, A., Mancini, C., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 238, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aadd49

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aadd49 2018

  45. [45]

    D., Cai, Z., Fan, X., et al

    Shi, D. D., Cai, Z., Fan, X., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 915, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfec0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfec0 2021

  46. [46]

    Shimakawa, R., Koyama, Y ., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 481, 5630, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2618

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2618 2018

  47. [47]

    C., Papovich, C., Momcheva, I., et al

    Simons, R. C., Papovich, C., Momcheva, I., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 923, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac28f4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac28f4 2021

  48. [48]

    2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 714, 1096, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1096

    Stanghellini, L., & Haywood, M. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 714, 1096, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1096

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1096 2010

  49. [49]

    Galaxy Metallicity Gradients in the Reionization Epoch from the FIRE-2 Simulations

    Sun, X., Wang, X., Jiang, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.08997, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.08997

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08997 2025

  50. [50]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addab5

    Sun, X., Wang, X., Ma, X., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addab5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addab5 2025

  51. [51]

    D’Avanzo, et al., A complete sample of bright Swift Gamma-Ray Bursts: X-ray afterglow luminosity and its correlation with the prompt emission

    Swinbank, A. M., Sobral, D., Smail, I., et al. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 426, 935, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21774.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21774.x 2012

  52. [52]

    B., Rosas-Guevara, Y ., Sillero, E., et al

    Tissera, P. B., Rosas-Guevara, Y ., Sillero, E., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 511, 1667, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3644

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3644 2022

  53. [53]

    2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438, 1894, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2340

    Torres-Flores, S., Scarano, S., Mendes de Oliveira, C., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438, 1894, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2340

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2340 2014

  54. [54]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 691, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449855

    Venturi, G., Carniani, S., Parlanti, E., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 691, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449855

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449855 2024

  55. [55]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 951, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd633

    Wang, K., Wang, X., & Chen, Y . 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 951, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd633

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd633 2023

  56. [56]

    A., Treu, T., et al

    Wang, X., Jones, T. A., Treu, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa603c —. 2019, ApJ, 882, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3861 —. 2020, ApJ, 900, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa603c 2017

  57. [57]

    2022, ApJ, 926, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3974

    Wang, X., Li, Z., Cai, Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3974

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3974 2022

  58. [58]

    2016, ApJ, 827, 74, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/74

    Wuyts, E., Wisnioski, E., Fossati, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 74, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/74

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/74 2016

  59. [59]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae27cf

    Yang, Y ., Wang, X., He, X., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae27cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae27cf 2026

  60. [60]

    J., & Rich, J

    Yuan, T.-T., Kewley, L. J., & Rich, J. 2013, ApJ, 767, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/106

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/106 2013

  61. [61]

    Z., Cai, Z., An, F

    Zheng, X. Z., Cai, Z., An, F. X., Fan, X., & Shi, D. D. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 4354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2882

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2882 2021

  62. [62]

    A., et al

    Zhou, H., Wang, X., Malkan, M. A., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 993, 231, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0649

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0649 2025