pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01932 · v1 · pith:WOOLBKN5new · submitted 2026-06-01 · 📊 stat.ME · stat.AP

Spatial Capture-Recapture With Penalized Regression Splines to Flexibly Model Wildlife Density and Distribution

Andrew E. Seaton , David L. Borchers , Milou Groenenberg , Ben Stevenson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ME stat.AP
keywords spatial capture-recapturepenalized regression splinesanimal densitylog-Gaussian Cox processwildlife distributionLaplace approximationpopulation estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Penalized regression splines in spatial capture-recapture models improve estimates of animal spatial distributions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a framework that replaces the Poisson point process assumption for animal activity centres with penalized regression splines, fitted through a Laplace-approximate penalized marginal maximum likelihood. The approach approximates a log-Gaussian Cox process to handle unobserved factors such as social clustering or territoriality that violate conditional independence. Traditional models assume independent activity centres and often produce reliable total abundance estimates even when this assumption fails. The spline method adds flexibility for nonlinear covariate effects on density and yields better recovery of the true spatial pattern in simulations and case studies.

Core claim

We present a spatial capture-recapture framework that allows penalized regression splines to describe the activity centre distribution, with model fitting via a Laplace-approximate penalized marginal maximum likelihood approach. Our method approximates using a log-Gaussian Cox process for activity centres and allows flexible modelling of nonlinear effects of covariates on density. Simulations and two case studies demonstrate that population size estimates of traditional approaches remain robust to density model misspecification while the spline-based model substantially improves estimation of spatial animal distributions.

What carries the argument

Penalized regression splines for the intensity function of the activity centre point process, fitted with Laplace approximation to the penalized marginal likelihood.

If this is right

  • Population size estimates remain reliable even when the density model is misspecified.
  • Spatial distribution estimates become substantially more accurate with the spline-based model.
  • Nonlinear effects of covariates on animal density can be incorporated directly.
  • The framework provides a route to approximate log-Gaussian Cox processes within existing spatial capture-recapture software.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • More accurate density surfaces could support finer-scale conservation planning for habitat protection.
  • The method may reduce bias in studies of species with strong social or territorial structure.
  • If the Laplace approximation continues to perform well, the approach could be extended to dynamic or time-varying density surfaces.
  • Abundance-focused monitoring programs could adopt the simpler Poisson model while distribution-focused work adopts the spline version.

Load-bearing premise

The Laplace approximation to the penalized marginal likelihood remains accurate enough that the spline-based density surface recovers the true spatial pattern without systematic bias when the true process deviates from a Poisson point process.

What would settle it

A simulation study in which activity centres are generated from a known clustered point process and the fitted spline model shows clear systematic bias in the recovered density surface.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01932 by Andrew E. Seaton, Ben Stevenson, David L. Borchers, Milou Groenenberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plot A: Estimated density across the study area from the black bear data (individuals per km2 ). Points correspond to hair-snare locations, with the size of the point indicating the number of different individuals detected there. Plots B–D: Standard errors, lower confidence interval limits, and upper confidence interval limits, respectively. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plots A–B: Spatial covariates and locations of sets of listening posts. Point size indicates the average number of groups detected. Plots C–D: Estimated density (calling groups per 100 km2 ) from Models SCR-I and SCR-S, respectively. Plot E: The estimated effects of distance to the nearest village under Models SCR-I and SCR-S. Plot F: The estimated spatial effect from Model SCR-S 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Estimated relationships between the covariate and density from Models SCR-I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot A: The covariate. Points correspond to detector locations. Plot B: The true density surface that arises from Equation (11). Plots C–E: Per-pixel mean estimated density across all simulated data sets for Models SCR-I, SCR-S, and SCR-LGCP. in activity centre locations, especially for SCR where the locations are latent and we only observe detection data. The overprediction in the upper left corner of the… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A summary of density estimate performance for all models across the simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spatial capture-recapture models are routinely used to estimate the abundance and distribution of wild animal populations and involve a latent spatial point process of animal activity centres that describes the spatial distribution of individuals. While traditional spatial capture-recapture models use a Poisson process, the assumption of conditional independence between points is often violated in practice due to factors not included in the point process, such as social clustering, territoriality, or preferential selection of habitat due to unobserved covariates. Log-Gaussian Cox processes are commonly used in spatial statistics to overcome weaknesses of Poisson processes, but methods to fit them within spatial capture-recapture do not currently exist. Here, we present a spatial capture-recapture framework that allows for the use of penalized regression splines to describe the activity centre distribution, with model fitting via a Laplace-approximate penalized marginal maximum likelihood approach. Our method approximates using a log-Gaussian Cox process for activity centres, and allows flexible modelling of nonlinear effect of covariates on density. We illustrate the use of our method with a simulation study and two case-studies. We demonstrate that, while population size estimates of traditional approaches are robust to density model misspecification, our approach substantially improves the estimation of spatial animal distributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a spatial capture-recapture (SCR) framework that replaces the standard Poisson point process for activity centres with penalized regression splines, approximating a log-Gaussian Cox process. Fitting proceeds via Laplace-approximate penalized marginal maximum likelihood. Simulations and two case studies are used to argue that traditional SCR abundance estimates remain robust to density misspecification while the spline approach yields substantially improved spatial distribution estimates.

Significance. If the spatial improvements are shown to be free of systematic bias from the Laplace step, the work would supply a practical, flexible tool for modeling nonlinear covariate effects on density in SCR studies, addressing a common violation of the Poisson assumption. The reported robustness of N is a useful secondary result for practitioners. The penalized-spline construction itself is a clear methodological contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation study section] Simulation study section: the reported gains in spatial distribution estimation rest on the claim that the Laplace-approximated penalized marginal likelihood recovers the true spline density surface without systematic bias when the generating process deviates from Poisson (e.g., via clustering or unobserved covariates). No targeted simulation isolating Laplace approximation error from other sources is described, which is load-bearing for the central spatial-improvement claim.
  2. [Methods section] Methods section on the penalized marginal likelihood: the accuracy of the Laplace approximation for the spline coefficients is asserted to be sufficient for spatial recovery, yet no analytic error bound or diagnostic (e.g., comparison of Laplace mode/curvature against MCMC on a subset of replicates) is provided; this directly affects whether the spline surface can be trusted to reflect true spatial patterns.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that population-size estimates are 'robust' but does not quantify the magnitude of bias or coverage under the misspecified models; a table or figure summarizing these metrics would strengthen the robustness claim.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the spline basis functions and the smoothing penalty parameter is introduced without an explicit reference to the dimension of the basis or the form of the penalty matrix; adding these details would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of validating the Laplace approximation in our proposed method. We respond to each major comment below and outline revisions to address the concerns.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Simulation study section: the reported gains in spatial distribution estimation rest on the claim that the Laplace-approximated penalized marginal likelihood recovers the true spline density surface without systematic bias when the generating process deviates from Poisson (e.g., via clustering or unobserved covariates). No targeted simulation isolating Laplace approximation error from other sources is described, which is load-bearing for the central spatial-improvement claim.

    Authors: We agree that a targeted simulation isolating the Laplace approximation error would strengthen confidence in the spatial recovery claims. Our simulations demonstrate that the fitted spline surfaces closely match the true generating surfaces across various misspecification scenarios, with low bias in spatial distribution estimates. To directly address this, we will add a new simulation component in the revised manuscript that compares Laplace-approximated estimates to full MCMC fits on a subset of replicates to isolate any approximation-induced bias. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Methods section on the penalized marginal likelihood: the accuracy of the Laplace approximation for the spline coefficients is asserted to be sufficient for spatial recovery, yet no analytic error bound or diagnostic (e.g., comparison of Laplace mode/curvature against MCMC on a subset of replicates) is provided; this directly affects whether the spline surface can be trusted to reflect true spatial patterns.

    Authors: Deriving a general analytic error bound for the Laplace approximation in this penalized marginal likelihood framework is not feasible within the scope of this work due to the complexity of the model and the penalized spline structure. However, we will include an empirical diagnostic by performing MCMC comparisons on a subset of simulation replicates to verify the accuracy of the Laplace mode and curvature for the spline coefficients. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing analytic error bounds for the Laplace approximation in the penalized marginal likelihood.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; new spline-based SCR framework with independent Laplace fitting and external validation

full rationale

The paper presents a new modeling construction: penalized regression splines for activity-centre density inside an SCR model, fitted via Laplace-approximated penalized marginal likelihood to approximate an LGCP. No equations or claims reduce a reported result to a fitted parameter by definition, nor does any central premise rest on a self-citation chain. Simulation studies and case studies are invoked as external checks rather than tautological outputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spline penalty theory, the validity of the Laplace approximation for the marginal likelihood, and the assumption that the spline model can capture unmodeled dependence structures.

free parameters (1)
  • spline smoothing penalty parameter
    Penalty strength controlling flexibility of the density surface; estimated via marginal likelihood.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Laplace approximation accurately represents the marginal likelihood for the penalized spline model
    Invoked for model fitting as described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Penalized regression splines can represent the intensity surface of a log-Gaussian Cox process sufficiently well for SCR inference
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5757 in / 1279 out tokens · 30943 ms · 2026-06-28T13:31:38.667908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Practical

    Baddeley, Adrian and Turner, Rolf , year =. Practical. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics , volume =. doi:10.1111/1467-842X.00128 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-842x.00128

  2. [2]

    and Sawaya, M

    Barrueto, M. and Sawaya, M. A. and Clevenger, A. P. , year =. Low Wolverine (. doi:10.1139/cjz-2019-0165 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1139/cjz-2019-0165 2019

  3. [3]

    Rolf , year =

    Berman, Mark and Turner, T. Rolf , year =. Approximating. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , volume =. doi:10.2307/2347614 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.2307/2347614

  4. [4]

    2020 , month = mar, journal =

    Consequences of Ignoring Group Association in Spatial Capture--Recapture Analysis , author =. 2020 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.2981/wlb.00649 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.2981/wlb.00649 2020

  5. [5]

    Environmetrics , volume =

    A Vector of Point Processes for Modeling Interactions between and within Species Using Capture-Recapture Data , author =. Environmetrics , volume =. doi:10.1002/env.2781 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/env.2781

  6. [6]

    and Chopara, R

    Durbach, I. and Chopara, R. and Borchers, D. L. and Phillip, R. and Sharma, K. and Stevenson, B. C. , year =. That's not the. Biometrics , volume =

  7. [7]

    2008 , volume =

    Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture-Recapture Studies , author =. 2008 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00927.x , journal =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00927.x 2008

  8. [8]

    2014 , institution =

    Flexible Density Surface Estimation for Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Surveys , author =. 2014 , institution =

    2014

  9. [9]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , number =

    A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations , author =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , number =. 2015 , volume =

    2015

  10. [10]

    Statistical Science , number =

    Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , author =. Statistical Science , number =. 2015 , volume =

    2015

  11. [11]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , number =

    Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , number =. 2020 , volume =

    2020

  12. [12]

    Ecography , number =

    Resource Pulses Influence the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of a Large Carnivore Population , author =. Ecography , number =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1111/ecog.05154 , annotation =

    work page doi:10.1111/ecog.05154 2021

  13. [13]

    2014 , journal =

    Spatially Explicit Integrated Population Models , author =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12153 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12153 2014

  14. [14]

    Clare, John and McKinney, Shawn T. and. Satellite-Detected Forest Disturbance Forecasts. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.020 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.020 2019

  15. [15]

    2015 , publisher =

    Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data , author =. 2015 , publisher =

    2015

  16. [16]

    Splines Minimizing Rotation-Invariant Semi-Norms in

    Duchon, Jean , editor =. Splines Minimizing Rotation-Invariant Semi-Norms in. Constructive. 1977 , pages =. doi:10.1007/BFb0086566 , series =

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0086566 1977

  17. [17]

    Oikos , number =

    Density Estimation in Live-Trapping Studies , author =. Oikos , number =. 2004 , volume =

    2004

  18. [18]

    Ecology , number =

    Population Density Estimated from Locations of Individuals on a Passive Decector Array , author =. Ecology , number =. 2009 , volume =

    2009

  19. [19]

    Spinons and triplons in spatially anisotropic frustrated antiferromagnets

    Estimating Population Size by Spatially Explicit Capture Recapture , author =. Oikos , number =. 2013 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20440.x , annotation =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20440.x 2013

  20. [20]

    2026 , note =

    secr: Spatially explicit capture-recapture models , author =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  21. [21]

    and Landers, Russ H

    Furnas, Brett J. and Landers, Russ H. and Paiste, Rhonda G. and Sacks, Benjamin N. , year =. Overabundance of. The Journal of Wildlife Management , volume =. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21849 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/jwmg.21849

  22. [22]

    Plos One , number =

    Investigating Effects of Soil Chemicals on Density of Small Mammal Bioindicators Using Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , author =. Plos One , number =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238870 , annotation =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238870 2020

  23. [23]

    2019 , journal =

    Reserve Design to Optimize Functional Connectivity and Animal Density , author =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1111/cobi.13369 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1111/cobi.13369 2019

  24. [24]

    1959 , volume =

    Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism , author =. 1959 , volume =. doi:10.4039/Ent91385-7 , journal =

    work page doi:10.4039/ent91385-7 1959

  25. [25]

    Ecology , number =

    The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference , author =. Ecology , number =. 1980 , volume =. doi:10.2307/1937156 , annotation =

    work page doi:10.2307/1937156 1980

  26. [26]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , number =

    Geoadditive Models , author =. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , number =. 2003 , volume =. doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00385 , annotation =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00385 2003

  27. [27]

    and Wahba, Grace , year =

    Kimeldorf, George S. and Wahba, Grace , year =. A Correspondence between. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , volume =. 2239347 , eprinttype =

  28. [28]

    and Skaug, Hans and Bell, Bradley M

    Kristensen, Kasper and Nielsen, Anders and Berg, Casper W. and Skaug, Hans and Bell, Bradley M. , year =. doi:10.18637/jss.v070.i05 , journal =

    work page doi:10.18637/jss.v070.i05

  29. [29]

    2018 , month = aug, journal =

    Compounding Effects of Human Development and a Natural Food Shortage on a Black Bear Population along a Human Development-Wildland Interface , author =. 2018 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.004 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.004 2018

  30. [30]

    Ecosphere , number =

    Integrating Telemetry Data into Spatial Capture-Recapture Modifies Inferences on Multi-Scale Resource Selection , author =. Ecosphere , number =. 2018 , volume =. doi:10.1002/ecs2.2203 , annotation =

    work page doi:10.1002/ecs2.2203 2018

  31. [31]

    Mann, Gareth K. H. and O'Riain, M. Justin and Parker, Daniel M. , year =. A Leopard's Favourite Spots:. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104218 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104218 2020

  32. [32]

    Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , number =

    Coverage Properties of Confidence Intervals for Generalized Additive Model Components , author =. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , number =. 2012 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00760.x , annotation =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00760.x 2012

  33. [33]

    M. Log. 1998 , volume =. doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00115 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00115 1998

  34. [34]

    and Wangchuk, Sonam and Tandin, Tandin and Tan, Cedric Kai Wei , year =

    Penjor, Ugyen and Macdonald, David W. and Wangchuk, Sonam and Tandin, Tandin and Tan, Cedric Kai Wei , year =. Identifying Important Conservation Areas for the Clouded Leopard. Ecology and Evolution , volume =. doi:10.1002/ece3.3970 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/ece3.3970

  35. [35]

    Density and Spatial Partitioning of Endangered Sympatric

    Rahman, Dede Aulia and Rianti, Puji and Muhiban, Muhiban and Muhtarom, Aom and Rahmat, Ujang Mamat and Santosa, Yanto and Aulagnier, Stephan. Density and Spatial Partitioning of Endangered Sympatric. 2018 , month = dec, journal =. doi:10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a8.2018 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a8.2018 2018

  36. [36]

    2021 , volume =

    Density Estimation of Tiger and Leopard Using Spatially Explicit Capture Recapture Framework , author =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.7717/peerj.10634 , journal =

    work page doi:10.7717/peerj.10634 2021

  37. [37]

    2014 , volume =

    A Spatial Capture-Recapture Model for Territorial Species , author =. 2014 , volume =. doi:10.1002/env.2317 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1002/env.2317 2014

  38. [38]

    Andrew and Young, Kevin V

    Royle, J. Andrew and Young, Kevin V. , year =. A Hierarchical Model for Spatial Capture. doi:10.1890/07-0601.1 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1890/07-0601.1

  39. [39]

    and Illian, J

    Simpson, D. and Illian, J. B. and Lindgren, F. and S. Going off Grid: Computationally Efficient Inference for Log-. Biometrika , volume =. doi:10.1093/biomet/asv064 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/asv064

  40. [40]

    Biometrics , pmid =

    Spatial Correlation Structures for Detections of Individuals in Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , author =. Biometrics , pmid =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  41. [41]

    Fast, Scalable Approximations to Posterior Distributions in Extended Latent

    Stringer, Alex and Brown, Patrick and Stafford, Jamie , year =. Fast, Scalable Approximations to Posterior Distributions in Extended Latent

  42. [42]

    2018 , volume =

    Large-Scale Variation in Density of an Aquatic Ecosystem Indicator Species , author =. 2018 , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26847-x , journal =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26847-x 2018

  43. [43]

    and Garcia Anleu, Rony and

    Tobler, Mathias W. and Garcia Anleu, Rony and. Do Responsibly Managed Logging Concessions Adequately Protect Jaguars and Other Large and Medium-Sized Mammals?. 2018 , month = apr, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.015 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.015 2018

  44. [44]

    , year =

    Tourani, M. , year =. A Review of Spatial Capture-Recapture:. Ecology and Evolution , number =

  45. [45]

    2019 , journal =

    Factors Associated with Black Bear Density and Implications for Management , author =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21744 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1002/jwmg.21744 2019

  46. [46]

    2011 , volume =

    Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models , author =. 2011 , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x , journal =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x 2011

  47. [47]

    , year =

    Wood, Simon N. , year =. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with

  48. [48]

    2003 , volume =

    Thin Plate Regression Splines , author =. 2003 , volume =. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00374 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00374 2003

  49. [49]

    The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume =

    Point Process Models for Spatio-Temporal Distance Sampling Data from a Large-Scale Survey of Blue Whales , author =. The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume =. doi:10.1214/17-AOAS1078 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1214/17-aoas1078

  50. [50]

    Bayesian Analysis , volume =

    Bayesian Adaptive Smoothing Splines Using Stochastic Differential Equations , author =. Bayesian Analysis , volume =

  51. [51]

    Rawson, B. M. and Hoang, M. D. and Roos, C. and Van, N. T. and Nguyen, M. H. , year =. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T128073282A17968950.en , journal =

    work page doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2020-2.rlts.t128073282a17968950.en 2020

  52. [52]

    2016 , volume =

    An Efficient Acoustic Density Estimation Method with Human Detectors Applied to Gibbons in Cambodia , author =. 2016 , volume =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155066 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155066 2016

  53. [53]

    McGrath, S. J. and Liu, J. and Stevenson, B. C. and Behie, A. M , year =. Density and Population Size Estimates of the Endangered Northen Yellow-Cheeked Crested Gibbon. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292386 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292386

  54. [54]

    and Korstjens, A

    Hankinson, E. and Korstjens, A. H. and Hill, R. A. and Wich, S. A. and Slater, H. D. and Abdullah, A. and Supradi, S. and Marsh, C. D. and Nijman, V. , year =. Effects of Anthropogenic Disturbance on Group Densities of Thomas' Langurs (. doi:10.1111/1440-1703.12373 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1111/1440-1703.12373

  55. [55]

    and Brooks, W

    Dovers, E. and Brooks, W. and Popovic, G. C. and Warton, D. I. , year =. Fast, Approximate Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Log-. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , number =

  56. [56]

    Superconductivity in Tetragonal LaPt_{2-x}Ge_{2+x}

    Dovers, E. and Stoklosa, J. and Warton, D. I. , year =. Fitting Log-. doi:10.1080/00031305.2024.2316725 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1080/00031305.2024.2316725 2024

  57. [57]

    and Chipperfield, J

    Zhang, W. and Chipperfield, J. D. and Illian, J. B. and Dupont, P. and Milleret, C. and de Valpine, P. and Bischof, R. , year =. A Flexible and Efficient. Ecology , number =

  58. [58]

    2008 , publisher =

    Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , author =. 2008 , publisher =

    2008

  59. [59]

    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics , number =

    Understanding the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach to Smoothing , author =. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics , number =. 2020 , volume =

    2020