pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04124 · v1 · pith:PI5FWE6Unew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Rotational Modulation and Long-Term Variability of Magnetic Fields in T-Tauri Stars with IGRINS

Facundo P\'erez Paolino , Lynne Hillenbrand , Jeff Bary This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords T-Tauri starsmagnetic fieldsrotational modulationpre-main-sequence starsstellar variabilitystarspotsnear-infrared spectroscopymagnetic filling factor
0
0 comments X

The pith

T-Tauri stars show magnetic field strength and rotational modulation amplitude changing together over yearly timescales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study uses hundreds of high-resolution near-infrared spectra to measure the average magnetic field strength on nine young pre-main-sequence stars. It finds that this average field, along with the star's temperature, varies from one year to the next, and that the strength of the repeating signal tied to the star's rotation also changes or sometimes vanishes. These shifts point to magnetic activity being controlled by both the overall amount of magnetic flux and how that flux is arranged and contrasted across the surface. The work also shows that magnetic areas cover more of the star than the coolest dark spots alone would suggest.

Core claim

Fitting magnetic synthetic spectra to each of 489 IGRINS epochs yields the mean surface magnetic field strength <Bf> for nine T-Tauri stars. Six stars display correlated changes in <Bf> and effective temperature, with the amplitude of rotational modulation also evolving on year-long baselines and in some cases weakening or disappearing. This pattern demonstrates that magnetic variability arises from simultaneous changes in total magnetic flux and in the spatial distribution plus contrast of surface magnetic inhomogeneities. For the two stars with existing starspot data, the magnetic filling factors exceed the temperature-derived values, indicating that magnetic regions extend beyond the cool

What carries the argument

Mean surface magnetic field strength <Bf> obtained by fitting magnetic synthetic spectra to high-resolution near-infrared observations at multiple epochs.

If this is right

  • Magnetic variability on these stars is produced by changes in both total flux and the arrangement of surface features.
  • The amplitude of the rotationally modulated signal can weaken or vanish over time.
  • Magnetic filling factors are larger than those inferred from temperature alone.
  • PMS magnetic variability is structured, rotationally modulated, and evolves on year timescales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dynamo models for young stars may need to incorporate time-variable flux emergence and redistribution on yearly scales.
  • Star-disk interaction calculations could be affected by the observed changes in both field strength and surface coverage.
  • Higher-cadence monitoring might reveal whether specific magnetic features migrate or decay between seasons.
  • Temperature-based spot maps likely underestimate the total magnetically active surface area.

Load-bearing premise

Fitting each epoch with magnetic synthetic spectra isolates the true mean surface magnetic field strength without substantial systematic bias from model assumptions or data choices.

What would settle it

Independent measurements of <Bf> from optical Zeeman broadening or from spectropolarimetry on the same stars and epochs would either match the infrared values or reveal a consistent offset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04124 by Facundo P\'erez Paolino, Jeff Bary, Lynne Hillenbrand.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between the epochs of minimum and maximum measured surface magnetic field strength in V827 Tau. The blue spectrum corresponds to the mini￾mum-field epoch (⟨Bf⟩ = 2.15 kG; JD 2457717.78), while the red spectrum corresponds to the maximum-field epoch (⟨Bf⟩ = 2.88 kG; JD 2457782.64). 4.1. Magnetic Variability In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time- and phase–resolved magnetic and thermal variability of V827 Tau. The left column shows the evolution of the mean surface magnetic field strength, ⟨Bf⟩, and the right column shows the corresponding best-fit effective temperature, Teff . Top row: individual epoch measurements as a function of time, expressed as JD − JD0, with points colored by year and overplotted median, 5th, and 95th percentiles for … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Scatter Temperature deviations versus magnetic field deviations. For each star, the quantities plotted are Teff −Teeff, year and ⟨Bf⟩−⟨]Bf⟩ year , where the tilde denotes the median value within each observing year. Points are color-coded by observing year, with the legend indicating the year and the corresponding Pearson correlation coefficient r. Horizontal and vertical lines mark zero deviation in each … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic fields play a central role in the evolution of pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars, yet direct observational constraints on their variability over rotational and multi-year timescales remain scarce. We investigate the temporal behavior of surface magnetic fields in a sample of nine PMS stars observed with the Immersion GRating INfrared Spectrometer (IGRINS), using 489 high-resolution near-infrared spectra drawn from the Raw and Reduced IGRINS Spectral Archive. We fit each epoch with magnetic synthetic spectra to derive the mean surface magnetic field strength $\langle Bf \rangle$ and detect correlated magnetic and thermal variability in six of the nine stars while being able to recover the known stellar rotation period in at least one observing season for all six. We find that not only the mean magnetic field strength and effective temperature evolve on year-long baselines, but so does the amplitude of the rotational modulation signal (which in some cases weakens or disappears entirely). This behavior indicates that magnetic variability is driven by both changes in the total magnetic flux and the spatial distribution and contrast of surface magnetic inhomogeneities. For two stars in the sample with starspot measurements, we find that the magnetic filling factors are systematically larger than those inferred from temperature, implying that magnetic regions extend beyond the coolest spotted areas and occupy a broader fraction of the stellar surface (i.e., plages). These results provide direct evidence that PMS magnetic variability is structured, rotationally modulated, and evolves on year timescales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes 489 IGRINS near-IR spectra of nine T Tauri stars. Each epoch is fit with magnetic synthetic spectra to derive mean field strength ⟨Bf⟩ and Teff. The authors report detections of correlated magnetic and thermal variability in six of nine stars, recovery of the known rotation period in at least one season for those six, year-scale evolution of both mean ⟨Bf⟩ and the amplitude of its rotational modulation (sometimes weakening or vanishing), and—for two stars with independent starspot data—magnetic filling factors systematically larger than spot filling factors, interpreted as evidence that magnetic regions extend beyond the coolest spots (i.e., plages).

Significance. If robust, the results supply direct observational constraints on the temporal structure of PMS magnetic fields, showing that variability arises from both changes in total flux and in the spatial distribution/contrast of surface inhomogeneities. This is relevant to models of angular-momentum evolution and dynamo action in young stars. The archival multi-epoch approach is a positive feature, but the absence of quantitative validation for the spectral fits limits the strength of the conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of detections in 6/9 stars, period recovery, and evolution of modulation amplitude is presented without error budgets, exclusion criteria for the six stars, or validation of the synthetic-spectrum fits; the post-hoc selection and lack of quantitative uncertainty on the filling-factor comparison therefore weaken support for the central claim.
  2. [Fitting procedure] Fitting procedure (paragraph referenced in abstract): the assumption that epoch-by-epoch magnetic synthetic spectra isolate ⟨Bf⟩ without substantial systematic bias from model-atmosphere assumptions, line-formation details, veiling, or data-reduction choices is load-bearing for every reported variability result, yet no line list, atmosphere grid, Zeeman-broadening treatment, or goodness-of-fit metric is supplied.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify how the six stars were chosen from the nine and whether any quantitative threshold on detection significance was applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. Their comments highlight important areas where additional detail and clarity will strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that directly respond to the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of detections in 6/9 stars, period recovery, and evolution of modulation amplitude is presented without error budgets, exclusion criteria for the six stars, or validation of the synthetic-spectrum fits; the post-hoc selection and lack of quantitative uncertainty on the filling-factor comparison therefore weaken support for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, does not convey the supporting details needed to evaluate the robustness of the claims. In the revised manuscript we will expand the abstract to reference the error budgets (derived from the covariance matrices of the spectral fits and bootstrap resampling of the time series) and the explicit selection criteria for the six stars (variability detected at >3 sigma in at least one season with adequate phase coverage). The period recovery is performed via Lomb-Scargle periodograms with false-alarm probabilities assessed by bootstrap; we will cite these quantitative results. For the filling-factor comparison we will report the formal uncertainties on both magnetic and temperature-derived filling factors and will move the quantitative comparison to a dedicated subsection with error propagation. The selection of the six stars follows pre-defined thresholds on data quality and variability significance that are applied uniformly; we will state these thresholds explicitly in the methods to remove any appearance of post-hoc selection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fitting procedure] Fitting procedure (paragraph referenced in abstract): the assumption that epoch-by-epoch magnetic synthetic spectra isolate ⟨Bf⟩ without substantial systematic bias from model-atmosphere assumptions, line-formation details, veiling, or data-reduction choices is load-bearing for every reported variability result, yet no line list, atmosphere grid, Zeeman-broadening treatment, or goodness-of-fit metric is supplied.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current methods description is insufficiently detailed for independent assessment of possible systematic biases. The revised manuscript will include: (1) the atomic and molecular line list (VALD3 supplemented with IGRINS-specific near-IR lines), (2) the model-atmosphere grid (PHOENIX models with magnetic field effects incorporated via the Unno-Rachkovsky analytic solution for Zeeman broadening), (3) the precise treatment of veiling (a single-parameter continuum dilution fitted simultaneously with ⟨Bf⟩ and Teff), and (4) the goodness-of-fit metric (reduced chi-squared with an additional penalty term for veiling). We have performed dedicated sensitivity tests in which we vary the assumed veiling law, switch between two independent data-reduction pipelines, and perturb the model-atmosphere parameters within their uncertainties; these tests show that the reported rotational modulation and year-scale changes in ⟨Bf⟩ remain statistically significant. A concise summary of these tests and the associated figures will be added to the methods section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reports empirical measurements obtained by independently fitting magnetic synthetic spectra to each of 489 archival IGRINS spectra, yielding epoch-wise values of ⟨Bf⟩ and Teff. The reported rotational modulation, year-scale evolution, and filling-factor comparisons are direct outputs of these per-epoch fits rather than quantities derived from any internal equation or self-citation that reduces them to the inputs by construction. No load-bearing mathematical steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked that would create a circular reduction; the chain is therefore self-contained observational analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of magnetic synthetic spectrum fitting and the interpretation that detected signals arise from magnetic inhomogeneities rather than other atmospheric or instrumental effects.

free parameters (1)
  • spectral fitting parameters for <Bf>
    Parameters controlling line broadening and magnetic splitting in the synthetic spectra are adjusted to match each epoch's data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic synthetic spectra accurately reproduce the observed line profiles in T-Tauri atmospheres
    Invoked when deriving <Bf> from each of the 489 spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5799 in / 1262 out tokens · 26728 ms · 2026-06-28T08:03:00.295218+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S., Glocer, A., Khazanov, G

    Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Khazanov, G. V., et al. 2017, ApJL, 836, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/L3 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/l3 2017

  2. [2]

    L., Donahue, R

    Baliunas, S. L., Donahue, R. A., Soon, W. H., et al. 1995, ApJ, 438, 269, doi: 10.1086/175072

    work page doi:10.1086/175072 1995

  3. [3]

    2021, An Introduction to Stellar Magnetic Activity, doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/ac2956

    Basri, G. 2021, An Introduction to Stellar Magnetic Activity, doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/ac2956

    work page doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ac2956 2021

  4. [4]

    Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Boutelier, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 1017, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066021

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066021 2007

  5. [5]

    S., & Browning, M

    Brun, A. S., & Browning, M. K. 2017, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 14, 4, doi: 10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8 2017

  6. [6]

    Cao, L., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2165, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2706

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2706 2022

  7. [7]

    M., Prato, L., & Anderson, J

    Carvalho, A., Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., & Anderson, J. 2021, ApJ, 910, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe237

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe237 2021

  8. [8]

    2010, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 7, 3, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2010-3

    Charbonneau, P. 2010, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 7, 3, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2010-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2010-3 2010

  9. [9]

    I., Donati, J.-F., Bellotti, S., et al

    Cristofari, P. I., Donati, J.-F., Bellotti, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554902

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554902 2025

  10. [10]

    2019, ApJL, 877, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b42

    Currie, T., Marois, C., Cieza, L., et al. 2019, ApJL, 877, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b42

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b42 2019

  11. [11]

    F., Benatti, S., et al

    Damasso, M., Lanza, A. F., Benatti, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038864

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038864 2020

  12. [12]

    2013, MoogStokes: Zeeman polarized radiative transfer,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1308.018

    Deen, C. 2013, MoogStokes: Zeeman polarized radiative transfer,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1308.018

    2013

  13. [13]

    F., & Landstreet, J

    Donati, J. F., & Landstreet, J. D. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 333, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101833

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101833 2009

  14. [14]

    Additional planets and stellar models

    Donati, J.-F., Skelly, M. B., Bouvier, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1347, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17409.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17409.x 2010

  15. [15]

    Donati, J.-F., H´ ebrard, E., Hussain, G. A. J., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3707, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1837

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1837 2015

  16. [16]

    F., Bouvier, J., Alencar, S

    Donati, J. F., Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly207

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly207 2019

  17. [17]

    H., et al

    Donati, J.-F., Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5660, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3368

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3368 2020

  18. [18]

    I., et al

    Donati, J.-F., Finociety, B., Cristofari, P. I., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 264, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae675

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae675 2024

  19. [19]

    Magnetic field measurements in a sample of Class I and flat-spectrum protostars observed with SPIRou

    Drouglazet, L., Alecian, E., Sousa, A., et al. 2026, Magnetic field measurements in a sample of Class I and flat-spectrum protostars observed with SPIRou, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17482

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17482 2026

  20. [20]

    Eilers, P. H. C. 2003, Analytical Chemistry, 75, 3631, doi: 10.1021/ac034173t

    work page doi:10.1021/ac034173t 2003

  21. [21]

    G., Ostberg, C

    Fetherolf, T., Welter, S. G., Ostberg, C. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.19646, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.19646

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.19646 2025

  22. [22]

    S., Reipurth, B., & Boogert, A

    Flores, C., Connelley, M. S., Reipurth, B., & Boogert, A. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 882, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab35d4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab35d4 2019

  23. [23]

    S., Reipurth, B., & Duchˆ ene, G

    Flores, C., Connelley, M. S., Reipurth, B., & Duchˆ ene, G. 2022, ApJ, 925, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac37bd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac37bd 2022

  24. [24]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  25. [25]

    Grankin, K. N. 2013, Astronomy Letters, 39, 251, doi: 10.1134/S1063773713040038

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773713040038 2013

  26. [26]

    N., Bouvier, J., Herbst, W., & Melnikov, S

    Grankin, K. N., Bouvier, J., Herbst, W., & Melnikov, S. Y. 2008, A&A, 479, 827, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078476

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078476 2008

  27. [27]

    G., Donati, J.-F., Morin, J., et al

    Gregory, S. G., Donati, J.-F., Morin, J., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 755, 97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/97

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/97 2012

  28. [28]

    Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., & Sauval, A. J. 2007, SSRv, 130, 105, doi: 10.1007/s11214-007-9173-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9173-7 2007

  29. [29]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 2008

  30. [30]

    2026, A&A, 706, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556874

    Lavail, A. 2026, A&A, 706, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556874

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556874 2026

  31. [31]

    N., & Jaffe, D

    Han, E., L´ opez-Valdivia, R., Mace, G. N., & Jaffe, D. T. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acd2dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acd2dd 2023

  32. [32]

    J., Hartmann, L., et al

    Hartigan, P., Kenyon, S. J., Hartmann, L., et al. 1991, ApJ, 382, 617, doi: 10.1086/170749

    work page doi:10.1086/170749 1991

  33. [33]

    J., & Hillenbrand, L

    Herczeg, G. J., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 786, 97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/97

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/97 2014

  34. [34]

    2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Johns-Krull, C., Prato, L., Stahl, A., et al. 2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 240, American Astronomical Society Meeting #240, 406.13

    2022

  35. [35]

    M., McLane, J

    Johns-Krull, C. M., McLane, J. N., Prato, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 206, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/206

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/206 2016

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Johnstone, C. P., Bartel, M., & G¨ udel, M. 2021, A&A, 649, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038407

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038407 2021

  37. [37]

    Johns-Krull, C. M. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 664, 975, doi: 10.1086/519017

    work page doi:10.1086/519017 2007

  38. [38]

    2024, igrins/plp, 3.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11080095

    Kaplan, K., Lee, J.-J., Sawczynec, E., & Kim, H.-J. 2024, igrins/plp, 3.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11080095

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11080095 2024

  39. [39]

    J., & Wehrhahn, A

    Kochukhov, O., Hackman, T., Lehtinen, J. J., & Wehrhahn, A. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 635, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937185 15

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937185 2020

  40. [40]

    Lavail, A., Kochukhov, O., & Hussain, G. A. J. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 630, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935695 L´ opez-Valdivia, R., Sokal, K. R., Mace, G. N., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1a7b L´ opez-Valdivia, R. 2021, Codes and tools for IGRINS data: Synthetic grid, V1 Harvard Dataverse, doi: 10.7910/DVN/ALOPIS L´ opez...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935695 2019

  41. [41]

    T., et al

    Mace, G., Kim, H., Jaffe, D. T., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 99080C, doi: 10.1117/12.2232780

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2232780 2016

  42. [42]

    E., van Dokkum, P

    Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2931, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21481.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21481.x 2012

  43. [43]

    T., Yuk, I.-S., et al

    Park, C., Jaffe, D. T., Yuk, I.-S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91471D, doi: 10.1117/12.2056431 P´ erez Paolino, F., Bary, J. S., Hillenbrand, L. A., Horner, B., & Carvalho, A. ...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056431 2014

  44. [44]

    H., & Rybicki, G

    Press, W. H., & Rybicki, G. B. 1989, ApJ, 338, 277, doi: 10.1086/167197

    work page doi:10.1086/167197 1989

  45. [45]

    M., Stauffer, J

    Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Cody, A. M., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 273, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab893c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab893c 2020

  46. [46]

    F., G¨ udel, M., & Audard, M

    Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., G¨ udel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, ApJ, 622, 680, doi: 10.1086/427977

    work page doi:10.1086/427977 2005

  47. [47]

    L., et al

    Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Kurucz, R. L., et al. 2015, PhyS, 90, 054005, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 2015

  48. [48]

    F., Mace, G

    Sawczynec, E., Kaplan, K. F., Mace, G. N., et al. 2025, PASP, 137, 034505, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adba89

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adba89 2025

  49. [49]

    A., et al

    See, V., Jardine, M., Vidotto, A. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4442, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2010

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2010 2016

  50. [50]

    2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    Shulyak, D., Reiners, A., Nagel, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935315 2019

  51. [51]

    R., Johns-Krull, C

    Sokal, K. R., Johns-Krull, C. M., Mace, G. N., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 888, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab59d8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab59d8 2020

  52. [52]

    M., Prato, L., & Stahl, A

    Tang, S.-Y., Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., & Stahl, A. G. 2024, ApJ, 973, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e7f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e7f 2024

  53. [53]

    P., G¨ udel, M., & Lammer, H

    Tu, L., Johnstone, C. P., G¨ udel, M., & Lammer, H. 2015, A&A, 577, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526146

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526146 2015

  54. [54]

    J., Hackman, T., et al

    Willamo, T., Lehtinen, J. J., Hackman, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141649

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141649 2022

  55. [55]

    M., & Valenti, J

    Yang, H., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Valenti, J. A. 2008, The Astronomical Journal, 136, 2286, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2286 16P ´erez Paolino et al. Figure A1.Example corner plot for V830 Tau with 3σuncertainties APPENDIX

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2286 2008