pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05848 · v1 · pith:UC65NXUQnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 💻 cs.RO

Visuotactile and Explicitly Force-Controlled Robotic Ultrasound for Abdominal Volumetric Reconstruction

Adrian Piedra , R Brooke Jeffrey , Oussama Khatib This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords robotic ultrasoundforce controlstereo visionvolumetric reconstructionabdominal imagingexpert motion replayautonomous scanning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A robotic system replays expert motions with stereo vision and force control to match expert abdominal ultrasound quality and acquire 3D volumes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how a robotic arm can autonomously scan a patient's abdomen using a combination of camera-based surface mapping, touch sensing to locate ribs, and playback of recorded expert hand movements and pressures. The robot uses closed-loop force control to keep the ultrasound probe in steady contact even as the surface curves and changes stiffness. Experiments confirm the resulting images are as clear as those from skilled radiologists, and the robot can sweep out full three-dimensional volumes that are hard to obtain by hand. Such automation could make consistent, high-quality ultrasound more widely available by reducing dependence on operator skill.

Core claim

The paper establishes that expert freehand motion and force data, combined with stereo vision for three-dimensional topography maps refined by stiffness measurements at key points to delineate the rib cage, enable a torque-controlled seven degree-of-freedom manipulator to execute adaptive scanning paths with closed-loop force control, achieving high-quality imaging comparable to expert scans and enabling three-dimensional volume acquisition.

What carries the argument

Replayed expert scan paths integrated with stereo vision topography and stiffness-based rib boundary detection, executed under explicit force control on a compliant robotic arm to maintain probe contact on patient-specific surfaces.

If this is right

  • The system adapts to patient-specific topographies using vision and stiffness data.
  • Image quality matches that of expert manual scans.
  • Three-dimensional volumetric data can be acquired, which enhances diagnostic potential.
  • The robot can perform scans that surpass expert capabilities in volume capture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the approach to other anatomical regions could broaden robotic ultrasound applications.
  • Real-time adjustment based on acquired ultrasound images might further improve scan quality.
  • Long-term use could standardize ultrasound procedures across different clinical settings.
  • Validation across more varied body types would strengthen evidence for clinical use.

Load-bearing premise

Replaying recorded expert freehand motion and force data combined with vision and stiffness maps produces clinically equivalent scans on varied patient anatomies without further calibration or safety measures.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of diagnostic outcomes from robotic versus multiple expert human scans on the same diverse patient group, where inferior or unsafe robotic results would disprove the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05848 by Adrian Piedra, Oussama Khatib, R Brooke Jeffrey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Robotic ultrasound acquisition system (with a focus on the gallbladder as an example). Left: Abdominal ultrasound phantom with RAS coordinate frame and labeled pathologies. Middle: Seven degree-of-freedom robot manipulating ultrasound transducer over the gallbladder. Right: Robotically acquired ultrasound image with the gallbladder highlighted. the transducer’s movements, adjust its angle, and apply the ne… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Freehand ultrasound scan setup. Left: Mechanism for recording ultrasound transducer position and orientation, along with the contact force between the transducer and phantom. Middle: Freehand scan recording setup (motion capture system frame labeled). Top right: Recorded freehand motion over phantom surface. Bottom right: Trimmed freehand motion without redundancy. 3.1.2. Selecting the Task Specification M… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Force modulation strategy for applying axial force and generating tangential motion over the deformable phantom surface. the directions corresponding to the singular values in the diagonal matrix Σ. The singular values are listed in decreasing order (σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3 ) and normalized by a scale factor of 1/ √ m, where m is the number of columns in S, to make the force magnitude invariant of the number of force… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: End-effector design for autonomous robotic ultra￾sound imaging. The stereo camera helps compute initial scan￾ning paths that are specific to the patient’s topography. The touch probe is used to refine the scanning paths by delineating the boundary between the ribs and soft tissue. the curvature of the ribs and soft tissue, while maintaining constant contact with the surface. A novel end-effector design for… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Generating a watertight surface mesh representing the phantom surface from an input point cloud. Left to right: (1) The input point cloud contains the phantom; (2) the point cloud is cropped to the phantom boundaries; (3) the normal direction is computed at each point; (4) a watertight mesh is generated with Poisson surface reconstruction; (5) the density map represents the mesh regions supported by the cr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Watertight surface mesh representing the abdominal phantom surface. The closeup image highlights the vertex normal vectors. This mesh provides a continuous representation of the position and normal direction at any point on the surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Construction of the sagittal ultrasound sweep. The computed sweep paths alternate from right-to-left and left-to￾right while moving from head-to-toe. Each path is the geodesic connecting the start and end path vertices. is undesirable due to acoustic shadowing, where ultrasound waves are blocked by the dense and highly reflective bone of the ribs, creating dark, non-diagnostic areas beneath them. The bound… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Procedure for measuring linear stiffness at different points on the phantom. At each point, a known force is applied and the resulting linear displacement is measured. For the same applied force, rib points displace less than soft tissue points. Algorithm 2 Rib Boundary Delineation and Path Generation Input: Mesh M, soft-tissue–to–rib stiffness ratio η, sagittal sweep lateral paths π1 . . . πN Output: Set … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Delineating the rib cage boundary and generating the under-rib sweep. Left to right: (1) The sagittal sweep path provides the reference for the rib detection procedure; (2) the center of each lateral path is found; (3) the stiffness is measured at key points along each lateral path; (4) the measured points corresponding to rib are identified (black); (5) the points adjacent to the rib points are found (red… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Linear stiffness values at the measured points on the phantom and the corresponding points on the rib cage boundary. Intersections with rib sweep Full transverse sweep Soft tissue sweep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Generating the soft tissue transverse sweep by removing the portions of the full transverse sweep that are above the rib cage boundary. shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Specifying desired transducer orientation for autonomous ultrasound sweeps. Left: The transducer’s normal, binormal, and tangent directions all intersect at the center of the transducer face. Middle: To view under the ribs, the binormal direction points from the transducer to the bottom-most lateral center point on the mesh (blue). The desired transducer normal direction is rotated from the surface normal… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Singular values of the contact force snapshot matrix from the full freehand scan, showing that the expert controls force along a single direction. Robotic replay Freehand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Ultrasound scans of the pancreas in the transverse plane. Left: The transducer motion. Middle: The transducer motion with the contact force magnitude applied onto the phantom at each point. Right: The ultrasound image acquired at the blue X location. Two echogenic lesions are highlighted in cyan, while hypoechoic lesions are highlighted in magenta. The different images along with the normalized Hamming di… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Projected transducer motion and force error during robotic replay scan. Freehand Robotic replay Transverse Sagittal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparing freehand and robotically-acquired ultrasound images. Left: The freehand and robotic replay scan images in the transverse and sagittal planes. Right: The Hamming distance between distance-based image hashes, normalized by the distance between the two different freehand images. The pose-tracked images enabled the acquisition of three-dimensional image datasets, which were compounded into three-dim… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Experimental setup for autonomous robotic ultrasound sweeps. The transducer pose is synchronized with the corresponding ultrasound image to acquire three-dimensional image datasets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Projected transducer motion and force error during autonomous rib boundary sweep. and 0.7 deg during the soft tissue sweep. The average force space linear force error magnitude along the projected x, y, and z-directions were 0.16 N, 1.08 N, and 0.68 N, respectively. During the soft tissue sweep, linear force error magnitudes were 0.26 N, 1.22 N, and 0.14 N. 5.3.2. Volume Reconstruction and Lesion Segmenta… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Projected transducer motion and force error during autonomous soft tissue sweep. Pose-tracked images Volume reconstruction Rib boundary sweep Soft tissue sweep Sweep path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Three-dimensional image datasets and corresponding volumes from the two autonomous ultrasound sweeps. of 8 cm3 , the measured volumes are smaller by a factor of 112 % and 124 %. 6. Conclusion Our framework and procedure for performing autonomous scans with a robotic ultrasound acquisition system represents a significant step toward generalizing robotic imaging for diverse patients and clinical scenarios. … view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Hepatic lesion highlighted in the phantom model and images taken from the rib boundary and soft tissue sweeps. 16.1 mm 22.2 mm 18.0 mm 21.4 mm 19.0 mm 17.5 mm Hepatic lesion segmentation in rib boundary volume Hepatic lesion segmentation in soft tissue volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Hepatic lesion segmentation process for the two autonomous ultrasound sweeps. Left-to-right: For each sweep, after the three-dimensional image volume was computed, the hepatic lesion was identified in the three multiplanar reformation views. The lesion was segmented in the volume, exported as a model with specified dimensions, and physically printed. stereo vision, touch-based perception, and expert-infor… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present a robotic ultrasound acquisition system that integrates stereo vision, touch-based feedback, and expert-informed strategies to perform autonomous and adaptive abdominal scans. The system records freehand motion and force data from expert radiologists, creating a framework to capture transducer motion, applied forces, and anatomical scanning strategies. This expert data is replayed to replicate characteristic scans with the robot, forming a foundation for further autonomous capabilities. Using stereo vision, the system generates three-dimensional topography maps of the patient's abdomen, which are refined through stiffness measurements at key points to delineate the rib cage boundary. These combined techniques enable the robot to execute two distinct scanning paths: an upward-angled sweep beneath the rib cage to visualize structures near the upper abdomen and a perpendicular sweep across soft tissue regions. A compliant, torque-controlled seven degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator is controlled to maintain consistent probe contact through closed-loop force control over the varied anatomical surfaces. Physical experiments demonstrate that the system achieves high-quality imaging comparable to expert scans while dynamically adapting to patient-specific topographies. Furthermore, the robotic system surpasses expert capabilities by enabling three-dimensional volume acquisition, which enhances diagnostic potential and provides volumetric data for advanced analyses. This work highlights the integration of expert knowledge into autonomous robotic systems and underscores the potential of combining perception-based autonomy with physical reasoning for enhanced diagnostic performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper describes a robotic ultrasound system for abdominal scanning that records and replays expert freehand motion/force trajectories, uses stereo vision to build 3D topography maps, incorporates discrete stiffness measurements to delineate the rib cage, selects between two fixed scanning paths (upward-angled beneath ribs or perpendicular soft-tissue), and employs closed-loop torque control on a 7-DoF manipulator to maintain contact force. Physical experiments are asserted to demonstrate image quality comparable to experts plus the ability to acquire 3D volumes that surpass expert freehand capabilities.

Significance. If the experimental validation holds with quantitative support, the hybrid expert-replay plus perception-based path selection and force control could provide a practical route to consistent, adaptive robotic ultrasound that enables volumetric reconstruction not feasible in standard freehand practice.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'physical experiments demonstrate that the system achieves high-quality imaging comparable to expert scans' supplies no quantitative image-quality metrics, statistical comparisons, error bars, patient numbers, or exclusion criteria. Without these, the performance assertions rest on unverified statements.
  2. [Methods] Methods / scanning-path description: adaptation is limited to binary selection between two fixed replayed trajectories based on rib-cage boundary from stereo topography plus discrete stiffness points; no mechanism is stated for continuously warping the expert trajectory or force profile to the measured surface geometry. This directly affects the 'dynamically adapting to patient-specific topographies' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'physical experiments demonstrate that the system achieves high-quality imaging comparable to expert scans' supplies no quantitative image-quality metrics, statistical comparisons, error bars, patient numbers, or exclusion criteria. Without these, the performance assertions rest on unverified statements.

    Authors: We agree the abstract lacks quantitative detail. The experimental results section reports image-quality metrics, statistical comparisons to expert scans, standard deviations, and the number of subjects and scans performed. We will revise the abstract to include these quantitative elements and patient details. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods / scanning-path description: adaptation is limited to binary selection between two fixed replayed trajectories based on rib-cage boundary from stereo topography plus discrete stiffness points; no mechanism is stated for continuously warping the expert trajectory or force profile to the measured surface geometry. This directly affects the 'dynamically adapting to patient-specific topographies' claim.

    Authors: The system adapts by using stereo topography and stiffness data to select between the two expert trajectories and then applies closed-loop torque control to maintain contact force and orientation on the actual surface. This provides real-time dynamic response to geometry without continuous trajectory warping. We will revise the methods section to clarify the exact adaptation mechanism and adjust the wording of the 'dynamically adapting' claim to match the implemented approach. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental system demonstration

full rationale

The paper describes a robotic ultrasound acquisition system that records and replays expert freehand motion/force data, uses stereo vision and stiffness measurements for path selection (two fixed scanning paths), and employs closed-loop torque control for contact force. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the abstract or described content. Central claims rest on physical experiments comparing image quality to expert scans, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to inputs or prior self-work. This is a standard experimental demonstration whose validity depends on external trials rather than internal definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities appear; the contribution is an integrated hardware-software system rather than a theoretical construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5774 in / 1138 out tokens · 34089 ms · 2026-06-28T01:23:25.668347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Unified Approach for Motion and Force Control of Robot Manipulators: The Operational Space Formulation , volume =

    Oussama Khatib , doi =. A Unified Approach for Motion and Force Control of Robot Manipulators: The Operational Space Formulation , volume =. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation , pages =

  2. [2]

    Local Autonomy-Based Haptic-Robot Interaction With Dual-Proxy Model , year =

    Mikael Jorda and Margot Vulliez and Oussama Khatib , doi =. Local Autonomy-Based Haptic-Robot Interaction With Dual-Proxy Model , year =. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , keywords =

  3. [3]

    Optimization of ultrasound image quality via visual servoing , volume =

    Pierre Chatelain and Alexandre Krupa and Nassir Navab , doi =. Optimization of ultrasound image quality via visual servoing , volume =. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages =

  4. [4]

    Contreras Ortiz and Tsuicheng Chiu and Martin D

    Sonia H. Contreras Ortiz and Tsuicheng Chiu and Martin D. Fox , doi =. Ultrasound image enhancement: A review , volume =. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control , keywords =

  5. [5]

    Interface design and control strategies for a robot assisted ultrasonic examination system , volume =

    François Conti and Jaeheung Park and Oussama Khatib , doi =. Interface design and control strategies for a robot assisted ultrasonic examination system , volume =. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics , pages =

  6. [6]

    Salcudean and Wen Hong Zhu and Mohammad Reza Sirouspour and Simon P

    Purang Abolmaesumi and Septimiu E. Salcudean and Wen Hong Zhu and Mohammad Reza Sirouspour and Simon P. DiMaio , doi =. Image-guided control of a robot for medical ultrasound , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , keywords =

  7. [7]

    A Review on Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging Technology , volume =

    Qinghua Huang and Zhaozheng Zeng , doi =. A Review on Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging Technology , volume =. BioMed Research International , pmid =

  8. [8]

    Blake and Toril A

    Ole Vegard Solberg and Frank Lindseth and Hans Torp and Richard E. Blake and Toril A. Nagelhus Hernes , doi =. Freehand 3D Ultrasound Reconstruction Algorithms—A Review , volume =. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology , keywords =

  9. [9]

    Non-rigid registration of 3D ultrasound for neurosurgery using automatic feature detection and matching , volume =

    Inês Machado and Matthew Toews and Jie Luo and Prashin Unadkat and Walid Essayed and Elizabeth George and Pedro Teodoro and Herculano Carvalho and Jorge Martins and Polina Golland and Steve Pieper and Sarah Frisken and Alexandra Golby and William Wells , doi =. Non-rigid registration of 3D ultrasound for neurosurgery using automatic feature detection and ...

  10. [10]

    Levinson , doi =

    Fai Yeung and Stephen F. Levinson , doi =. Feature-adaptive motion tracking of ultrasound image sequences using a deformable mesh , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , keywords =

  11. [11]

    Sebastian Grassia , doi =

    F. Sebastian Grassia , doi =. Practical Parameterization of Rotations Using the Exponential Map , volume =. Journal of Graphics Tools , pages =

  12. [12]

    On-Line Trajectory Generation in Robotic Systems: Basic Concepts for Instantaneous Reactions to Unforeseen (Sensor) Events , volume =

    Torsten Kröger , doi =. On-Line Trajectory Generation in Robotic Systems: Basic Concepts for Instantaneous Reactions to Unforeseen (Sensor) Events , volume =. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics , pages =

  13. [13]

    Pieper and Kirby G

    Ron Kikinis and Steve D. Pieper and Kirby G. Vosburgh , doi =. 3D Slicer: A Platform for Subject-Specific Image Analysis, Visualization, and Clinical Support , year =. Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy , pages =

  14. [14]

    Approximate partitioned method of snapshots for POD , volume =

    Zhu Wang and Brian McBee and Traian Iliescu , doi =. Approximate partitioned method of snapshots for POD , volume =. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , keywords =

  15. [15]

    Resolving the sign ambiguity in the singular value decomposition

    Rasmus Bro and Evrim Acar and Tamara Gibson Kolda , city =. Resolving the sign ambiguity in the singular value decomposition. , year =. doi:10.2172/920802 , institution =

    work page doi:10.2172/920802

  16. [16]

    Kunisch and S

    K. Kunisch and S. Volkwein , doi =. Control of the Burgers equation by a reduced-order approach using proper orthogonal decomposition , volume =. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , keywords =

  17. [17]

    Senthilkumar and M

    V. Senthilkumar and M. Ezhilarasi , doi =. An efficient multi-RVM classification-based ultrasound lung image retrieval approach , volume =. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology , keywords =

  18. [18]

    Nearest neighbor retrieval using distance-based hashing , year =

    Vassilis Athitsos and Michalis Potamias and Panagiotis Papapetrou and George Kollios , doi =. Nearest neighbor retrieval using distance-based hashing , year =. Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering , pages =

  19. [19]

    Gradient response maps for real-time detection of textureless objects , volume =

    Stefan Hinterstoisser and Cedric Cagniart and Slobodan Ilic and Peter Sturm and Nassir Navab and Pascal Fua and Vincent Lepetit , doi =. Gradient response maps for real-time detection of textureless objects , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , keywords =

  20. [20]

    Badino and D

    H. Badino and D. Huber and Y. Park and T. Kanade , doi =. Fast and accurate computation of surface normals from range images , year =. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages =

  21. [21]

    Hugh B Morgenbesser and Mandayam A Srinivasan and Hugh Brian Morgenbesser , title =

  22. [22]

    Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects with Radial Basis Functions , year =

    J C Carr and ½¾ R K Beatson and J B Cherrie and ½ T J Mitchell and ½¾ W R Fright and ½ B C Mccallum and ½ T R Evans , isbn =. Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects with Radial Basis Functions , year =

  23. [23]

    Kobbelt , doi =

    Mark Pauly and Markus Gross and Leif P. Kobbelt , doi =. Efficient simplification of point-sampled surfaces , year =. Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference , pages =

  24. [24]

    You Can Find Geodesic Paths in Triangle Meshes by Just Flipping Edges , volume =

    Nicholas Sharp and Keenan Crane , doi =. You Can Find Geodesic Paths in Triangle Meshes by Just Flipping Edges , volume =. ACM Trans. Graph , keywords =

  25. [25]

    Hugues Hoppe and Tony Derose and Tom Duchamp and John Mcdonald and Werner Stuetzle , keywords =

  26. [26]

    Intrinsic shape signatures: A shape descriptor for 3D object recognition , year =

    Zhong Yu , doi =. Intrinsic shape signatures: A shape descriptor for 3D object recognition , year =. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops 2009 , pages =

    2009

  27. [27]

    As-Rigid-As-Possible Surface Modeling , year =

    Olga Sorkine and Marc Alexa and T U Berlin , journal =. As-Rigid-As-Possible Surface Modeling , year =

  28. [28]

    Poisson Surface Reconstruction , year =

    Michael Kazhdan and Matthew Bolitho and Hugues Hoppe , journal =. Poisson Surface Reconstruction , year =

  29. [29]

    Real-Time Vision-Based Stiffness Mapping † , volume =

    Angela Faragasso and João Bimbo and Agostino Stilli and Helge Arne Wurdemann and Kaspar Althoefer and Hajime Asama , doi =. Real-Time Vision-Based Stiffness Mapping † , volume =. Sensors 2018, Vol. 18, Page 1347 , keywords =

    2018

  30. [30]

    C. W. Kennedy and J. P. Desai , doi =. A vision-based approach for estimating contact forces: Applications to robot-assisted surgery , volume =. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics , month =

  31. [31]

    Shape-Reconstruction-Based Force Sensing Method for Continuum Surgical Robots with Large Deformation , volume =

    Han Yuan and Philip Wai Yan Chiu and Zheng Li , doi =. Shape-Reconstruction-Based Force Sensing Method for Continuum Surgical Robots with Large Deformation , volume =. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , keywords =

  32. [32]

    Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems , volume =

    Nicola Diolaiti and Claudio Melchiorri and Stefano Stramigioli , doi =. Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , keywords =

  33. [33]

    Coutinho and R

    F. Coutinho and R. Cortesão , doi =. Online stiffness estimation for robotic tasks with force observers , volume =. Control Engineering Practice , keywords =

  34. [34]

    Hand-Eye Calibration Using Dual Quaternions , volume =

    Konstantinos Daniilidis , doi =. Hand-Eye Calibration Using Dual Quaternions , volume =. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02783649922066213 , month =

    work page doi:10.1177/02783649922066213

  35. [35]

    Alba Perez and J. M. McCarthy , doi =. Dual Quaternion Synthesis of Constrained Robotic Systems , volume =. Journal of Mechanical Design , keywords =

  36. [36]

    Recent advances in point-of-care ultrasound using the imfusion suite for real-time image analysis , volume =

    Oliver Zettinig and Mehrdad Salehi and Raphael Prevost and Wolfgang Wein , doi =. Recent advances in point-of-care ultrasound using the imfusion suite for real-time image analysis , volume =. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , pages =

  37. [37]

    Salcudean and Nassir Navab , doi =

    Zhongliang Jiang and Septimiu E. Salcudean and Nassir Navab , doi =. Robotic ultrasound imaging: State-of-the-art and future perspectives , volume =. Medical Image Analysis , keywords =

  38. [38]

    Autonomous ultrasound scanning robotic system based on human posture recognition and image servo control: an application for cardiac imaging , volume =

    Xiuhong Tang and Hongbo Wang and Jingjing Luo and Jinlei Jiang and Fan Nian and Lizhe Qi and Lingfeng Sang and Zhongxue Gan , doi =. Autonomous ultrasound scanning robotic system based on human posture recognition and image servo control: an application for cardiac imaging , volume =. Frontiers in robotics and AI , keywords =

  39. [39]

    Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing , year =

    Qian-Yi Zhou and Jaesik Park and Vladlen Koltun , month =. Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing , year =

  40. [40]

    Compliant Joint Based Robotic Ultrasound Scanning System for Imaging Human Spine , volume =

    Yunjiang Wang and Tianjian Liu and Xinben Hu and Keji Yang and Yongjian Zhu and Haoran Jin , doi =. Compliant Joint Based Robotic Ultrasound Scanning System for Imaging Human Spine , volume =. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , keywords =

  41. [41]

    Machine Learning in Robotic Ultrasound Imaging: Challenges and Perspectives , volume =

    Yuan Bi and Zhongliang Jiang and Felix Duelmer and Dianye Huang and Nassir Navab , doi =. Machine Learning in Robotic Ultrasound Imaging: Challenges and Perspectives , volume =. Annu. Rev. Control. Robotics Auton. Syst. , keywords =

  42. [42]

    Meng , doi =

    Keyu Li and Yangxin Xu and Max Q.H. Meng , doi =. An Overview of Systems and Techniques for Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Acquisitions , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics , keywords =

  43. [43]

    Remote Ultrasound Scan Procedures with Medical Robots: Towards New Perspectives between Medicine and Engineering , volume =

    Maide Bucolo and Gea Bucolo and Arturo Buscarino and Agata Fiumara and Luigi Fortuna and Salvina Gagliano , doi =. Remote Ultrasound Scan Procedures with Medical Robots: Towards New Perspectives between Medicine and Engineering , volume =. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics , publisher =

  44. [44]

    Christoforou and Andreas S

    Sotiris Avgousti and Eftychios G. Christoforou and Andreas S. Panayides and Sotos Voskarides and Cyril Novales and Laurence Nouaille and Constantinos S. Pattichis and Pierre Vieyres , doi =. Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends , volume =. BioMedical Engineering OnLine , keywords =

  45. [45]

    Compliance Control for Robot Manipulation in Contact with a Varied Environment Based on a New Joint Torque Controller , volume =

    Yunfei Dong and Tianyu Ren and Dan Wu and Ken Chen , doi =. Compliance Control for Robot Manipulation in Contact with a Varied Environment Based on a New Joint Torque Controller , volume =. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems , keywords =

  46. [46]

    Rodriguez-Andina and Huijun Gao , doi =

    Yongqing Fu and Weiyang Lin and Xinghu Yu and Juan J. Rodriguez-Andina and Huijun Gao , doi =. Robot-Assisted Teleoperation Ultrasound System Based on Fusion of Augmented Reality and Predictive Force , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , keywords =

  47. [47]

    Design and Quantitative Assessment of Teleoperation-Based Human–Robot Collaboration Method for Robot-Assisted Sonography , year =

    Weiyong Si and Ning Wang and Chenguang Yang , doi =. Design and Quantitative Assessment of Teleoperation-Based Human–Robot Collaboration Method for Robot-Assisted Sonography , year =. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , keywords =

  48. [48]

    Development of a Robotic Ultrasound System to Assist Ultrasound Examination of Pregnant Women , volume =

    Maria Bamaarouf and Flavien Paccot and Laurent Sarry and Hélène Chanal , doi =. Development of a Robotic Ultrasound System to Assist Ultrasound Examination of Pregnant Women , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics , keywords =

  49. [49]

    Saha and S

    Deepak Raina and Ziming Zhao and Richard Voyles and Juan Wachs and Subir K. Saha and S. H. Chandrashekhara , doi =. UltraGelBot: Autonomous Gel Dispenser for Robotic Ultrasound , year =. ArXiv , pages =

  50. [50]

    Zhang , doi =

    Wen Yi Kuo and Xihan Ma and Dhirajsinh Deshmukh and Haichong K. Zhang , doi =. Automatic Contact Force-regulated End-effector Using Pneumatic Actuator for Safe Robotic Ultrasound Imaging , year =. International Symposium on Medical Robotics , publisher =

  51. [51]

    Shyam and Aparna Purayath and S

    A. Shyam and Aparna Purayath and S. Keerthivasan and S. M. Akash and Aswathaman Govindaraju and Manojkumar Lakshmanan and Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam , doi =. Immersive Virtual Reality Platform for Robot-Assisted Antenatal Ultrasound Scanning , year =. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , pages =

  52. [52]

    Computed-Torque Control for Robotic-Assisted Tele-Echography Based on Perceived Stiffness Estimation , volume =

    Luis Santos and Rui Cortesao , doi =. Computed-Torque Control for Robotic-Assisted Tele-Echography Based on Perceived Stiffness Estimation , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , keywords =

  53. [53]

    Medical Robotics for Ultrasound Imaging: Current Systems and Future Trends , volume =

    Felix von Haxthausen and Sven Böttger and Daniel Wulff and Jannis Hagenah and Verónica García-Vázquez and Svenja Ipsen , doi =. Medical Robotics for Ultrasound Imaging: Current Systems and Future Trends , volume =. Current robotics reports , keywords =

  54. [54]

    Design and Calibration of a Joint Torque Sensor for Robot Compliance Control , volume =

    Bing Fu and Ganwei Cai , doi =. Design and Calibration of a Joint Torque Sensor for Robot Compliance Control , volume =. IEEE Sensors Journal , keywords =

  55. [55]

    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing , title =

    Grant Duffy and Kai Christensen and David Ouyang , doi =. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing , title =

  56. [56]

    Salinaro and Patricia J

    Julia R. Salinaro and Patricia J. McNally and Joao R. Nickenig Vissoci and Sarah C. Ellestad and Brian Nelson and Joshua S. Broder , doi =. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine , title =

  57. [57]

    Satvika Bharadwaj and Komal Shah and Yifan Zhao and Aparna Harindranath and Arun George and Kajoli Krishnan and Manish Arora , doi =. Semi-blinded freehand 3D ultrasound with novice users from Indian Institute of Science, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Cranfield University and St.John's Medical College Hospital , year =

  58. [58]

    Torres and Bruno Oliveira and João Gomes-Fonseca and L

    Simao Valente and Pedro Morais and Helena R. Torres and Bruno Oliveira and João Gomes-Fonseca and L. R. Buschle and A. Fritz and Jorge Correia-Pinto and Estevão Lima and João L. Vilaça , doi =. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS , title =

  59. [59]

    Brooke Jeffrey and Oussama Khatib , doi =

    Adrian Piedra and R. Brooke Jeffrey and Oussama Khatib , doi =. Robotic Ultrasound Imaging with Haptic Guidance and Human Expert Strategies , volume =. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics , pages =

  60. [60]

    Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering : 327--336doi:10.1109/ICDE.2008.4497441

    Athitsos V, Potamias M, Papapetrou P and Kollios G (2008) Nearest neighbor retrieval using distance-based hashing. Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering : 327--336doi:10.1109/ICDE.2008.4497441

    work page doi:10.1109/icde.2008.4497441 2008

  61. [61]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 6: 796--805

    Bamaarouf M, Paccot F, Sarry L and Chanal H (2024) Development of a robotic ultrasound system to assist ultrasound examination of pregnant women. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 6: 796--805. doi:10.1109/TMRB.2024.3387047

    work page doi:10.1109/tmrb.2024.3387047 2024

  62. [62]

    doi:10.1117/12.2610969

    Bharadwaj S, Shah K, Zhao Y, Harindranath A, George A, Krishnan K and Arora M (2022) Semi-blinded freehand 3d ultrasound with novice users from indian institute of science, national institute of advanced studies, cranfield university and st.john's medical college hospital. doi:10.1117/12.2610969

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2610969 2022

  63. [63]

    Bi Y, Jiang Z, Duelmer F, Huang D and Navab N (2024) Machine learning in robotic ultrasound imaging: Challenges and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Control. Robotics Auton. Syst. 7: 335--357. doi:10.1146/ANNUREV-CONTROL-091523-100042

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-control-091523-100042 2024

  64. [64]

    Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2015-June: 5997--6002

    Chatelain P, Krupa A and Navab N (2015) Optimization of ultrasound image quality via visual servoing. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2015-June: 5997--6002. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2015.7140040

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7140040 2015

  65. [65]

    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 79: 97--113

    Conti F, Park J and Khatib O (2014) Interface design and control strategies for a robot assisted ultrasonic examination system. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 79: 97--113. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28572-1_7/COVER

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28572-1_7/cover 2014

  66. [66]

    In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

    Duffy G, Christensen K and Ouyang D (2024) Leveraging 3d echocardiograms to evaluate ai model performance in predicting cardiac function on out-of-distribution data. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. doi:10.1142/9789811286421_0004

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811286421_0004 2024

  67. [67]

    IEEE Sensors Journal 21: 21378--21389

    Fu B and Cai G (2021) Design and calibration of a joint torque sensor for robot compliance control. IEEE Sensors Journal 21: 21378--21389. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3104351

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2021.3104351 2021

  68. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 70: 7449--7456

    Fu Y, Lin W, Yu X, Rodriguez-Andina JJ and Gao H (2023) Robot-assisted teleoperation ultrasound system based on fusion of augmented reality and predictive force. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 70: 7449--7456. doi:10.1109/TIE.2022.3201322

    work page doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3201322 2023

  69. [69]

    BioMed Research International 2017

    Huang Q and Zeng Z (2017) A review on real-time 3d ultrasound imaging technology. BioMed Research International 2017. doi:10.1155/2017/6027029

    work page doi:10.1155/2017/6027029 2017

  70. [70]

    Medical Image Analysis 89: 102878

    Jiang Z, Salcudean SE and Navab N (2023) Robotic ultrasound imaging: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Medical Image Analysis 89: 102878. doi:10.1016/J.MEDIA.2023.102878

    work page doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102878 2023

  71. [71]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics pp

    Jorda M, Vulliez M and Khatib O (2022) Local autonomy-based haptic-robot interaction with dual-proxy model. IEEE Transactions on Robotics doi:10.1109/TRO.2022.3160053

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3160053 2022

  72. [72]

    Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing

    Kazhdan M, Bolitho M and Hoppe H (2006) Poisson surface reconstruction. Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing

    2006

  73. [73]

    IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation 3: 43--53

    Khatib O (1987) A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation 3: 43--53. doi:10.1109/JRA.1987.1087068

    work page doi:10.1109/jra.1987.1087068 1987

  74. [74]

    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 58: 1--230

    Kröger T (2010) On-line trajectory generation in robotic systems: Basic concepts for instantaneous reactions to unforeseen (sensor) events. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 58: 1--230. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05175-3_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05175-3_1 2010

  75. [75]

    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 102: 345--371

    Kunisch K and Volkwein S (1999) Control of the burgers equation by a reduced-order approach using proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 102: 345--371. doi:10.1023/A:1021732508059/METRICS

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1021732508059/metrics 1999

  76. [76]

    International Symposium on Medical Robotics doi:10.1109/ISMR57123.2023.10130200

    Kuo WY, Ma X, Deshmukh D and Zhang HK (2023) Automatic contact force-regulated end-effector using pneumatic actuator for safe robotic ultrasound imaging. International Symposium on Medical Robotics doi:10.1109/ISMR57123.2023.10130200

    work page doi:10.1109/ismr57123.2023.10130200 2023

  77. [77]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 3: 510--524

    Li K, Xu Y and Meng MQ (2021) An overview of systems and techniques for autonomous robotic ultrasound acquisitions. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 3: 510--524. doi:10.1109/TMRB.2021.3072190

    work page doi:10.1109/tmrb.2021.3072190 2021

  78. [78]

    Non-rigid registration of 3D ultrasound for neurosurgery using automatic feature detection and matching

    Machado I, Toews M, Luo J, Unadkat P, Essayed W, George E, Teodoro P, Carvalho H, Martins J, Golland P, Pieper S, Frisken S, Golby A and Wells W (2018) Non-rigid registration of 3d ultrasound for neurosurgery using automatic feature detection and matching. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 13: 1525. doi:10.1007/S11548-018-1786-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11548-018-1786-7 2018

  79. [79]

    In: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, volume 30

    Piedra A, Jeffrey RB and Khatib O (2024) Robotic ultrasound imaging with haptic guidance and human expert strategies. In: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, volume 30. Springer Nature, pp. 53--65. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63596-0_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63596-0_6 2024

  80. [80]

    ArXiv : 119--120doi:10.31256/HSMR2024.60

    Raina D, Zhao Z, Voyles R, Wachs J, Saha SK and Chandrashekhara SH (2024) Ultragelbot: Autonomous gel dispenser for robotic ultrasound. ArXiv : 119--120doi:10.31256/HSMR2024.60

    work page doi:10.31256/hsmr2024.60 2024

Showing first 80 references.