pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06575 · v1 · pith:UGEMLBGUnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The quasi-star model for Little Red Dots: potential and challenges

Fabrizio Gentile , Mauro Giavalisco , Emanuele Daddi , David Elbaz , Jean-Baptiste Billand , Maximilen Franco , Benjamin Magnelli , Guillermo Barro
show 20 more authors
Yingjie Cheng Nikko J. Cleri Kelcey Davis Ivan Delvecchio Mark Dickinson Steven L. Finkelstein Giovanni Gandolfi Michaela Hirschmann Weida Hu Dale Kocevski Anton M. Koekemoer Ray Lucas Sara Mascia Lorenzo Napolitano Casey Papovich Borja P\'erez-D\'iaz Pablo Perez-Gonzalez Jonathan R. Trump Xin Wang L. Y. Aaron Yung
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red Dotsquasi-star modelsupermassive black hole seedsJWST spectroscopyBalmer breakearly universe galaxiesAGN modelsradiative transfer
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quasi-star model with a low-mass accreting black hole and surrounding dense gas shell reproduces the UV-to-NIR continuum shape including the Balmer break and hydrogen line luminosities of some Little Red Dots when combined with host galax

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Little Red Dots exhibit a V-shaped rest-frame UV-optical spectral energy distribution, compact morphology, and often broad hydrogen lines. The authors test whether these features can arise from a quasi-star configuration consisting of an accreting black hole of 10^5 to 10^6 solar masses surrounded by a convective layer that emits a 5000 K blackbody, reprocessed first by a thick dense gas shell and then by a clumpy medium. When the emerging radiation is added to ultraviolet light from a surrounding host galaxy the combined spectrum matches the observed continuum shape, the Balmer break, and the strengths of the hydrogen emission lines. The same model does not produce broad helium lines or hot dust emission without extra components, which demonstrates that multiple physical pictures remain consistent with current data.

Core claim

The quasi-star model consists of an accreting SMBH (M_BH ~10^{5-6} M_⊙) surrounded by a convective layer producing a black-body spectrum with T~5000 K and L~10^{44.4} erg s^{-1}, which is reprocessed by a concentric thick (ΔR~1000 AU) shell of dense (n_H~10^{11} cm^{-3}) gas partially ionised by thermal collisions and further reprocessed by a diffuse clumpy medium; once coupled with UV emission from a host galaxy this configuration reproduces the UV-to-NIR continuum shape including the Balmer break as well as the luminosity of the hydrogen emission lines, although it does not natively account for the presence of broad helium lines and the possible presence of hot dust.

What carries the argument

Quasi-star: accreting low-mass black hole whose blackbody emission is reprocessed by a thick dense partially ionized gas shell and outer clumpy medium.

If this is right

  • Some LRDs can be modeled as quasi-stars.
  • The model reproduces the UV-to-NIR continuum and hydrogen line luminosities when host galaxy UV is included.
  • Broad helium lines and hot dust require additional components.
  • Significant degeneracy exists among different LRD models.
  • The degeneracy affects understanding of black hole growth mechanisms in the early Universe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a substantial fraction of LRDs are quasi-stars, this would favor a particular channel for rapid early black hole assembly.
  • Multi-wavelength data targeting helium lines or mid-infrared dust emission could distinguish quasi-star models from other AGN or star-formation interpretations.
  • The narrow range of required physical parameters implies that statistical samples from future surveys could test how common such conditions are at high redshift.

Load-bearing premise

The black hole mass, blackbody temperature, luminosity, gas density, shell thickness, and clumpy medium properties must be tuned to specific values to match the observed spectra.

What would settle it

Detection of strong broad helium lines or significant hot dust emission in LRDs that cannot be reproduced without adding separate components to the quasi-star model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06575 by Anton M. Koekemoer, Benjamin Magnelli, Borja P\'erez-D\'iaz, Casey Papovich, Dale Kocevski, David Elbaz, Emanuele Daddi, Fabrizio Gentile, Giovanni Gandolfi, Guillermo Barro, Ivan Delvecchio, Jean-Baptiste Billand, Jonathan R. Trump, Kelcey Davis, Lorenzo Napolitano, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Mark Dickinson, Mauro Giavalisco, Maximilen Franco, Michaela Hirschmann, Nikko J. Cleri, Pablo Perez-Gonzalez, Ray Lucas, Sara Mascia, Steven L. Finkelstein, Weida Hu, Xin Wang, Yingjie Cheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch representing the main model given in input to Cloudy. Our quasi-star model is inspired by Begelman et al. (2008) and includes a source of energy surrounded by a convective shell and by a dense layer of gas. The quasi-star is then surrounded by a diffuse and clumpy medium, with the possible presence of a warmer corona (see Sect. 3.5.1). The spectrum produced by each layer is shown on the right part o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Some examples of the quasi-star model applied to LRDs in the sample by de Graaff et al. (2025b). The black solid line shows the NIRSpec/PRISM spectrum, while the magenta solid line shows the best-fitting composite model. Its two components are shown as violet dashed line (quasi-star) and pink dotted line (host galaxy). The shaded areas indicate the non-hydrogen emission lines that are masked in the fit: me… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The empirical correlation between strength of the Balmer break and the Balmer decrement (FHα /FHβ ) observed by previous studies (e.g., de Graaff et al. 2025b; Matthee et al. 2026) and its possible expla￾nation in the quasi-star scenario as an effect of the increasing hydrogen column density. The values on the two axes are taken from the cata￾logue by de Graaff et al. (2025b), while the values of NH (colou… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of LRD fitted by our Cloudy model where the quasi￾star shows a non-negligible contribution to the blue-optical spectrum bluer than the Balmer break. The LRD is ID-4820 taken from GO-2198 (PI: L. Barrufet), the colour-coding is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the black hole masses and the stellar masses of the host galaxies for the LRDs analysed in Section 3. The black hole masses are estimated from the bolometric luminosities of the quasi-star by assuming a ratio MBH/MQS (Coughlin & Begelman 2024). Two extreme values of MBH/MQS = 0.1 (minimum for having a LRD-like spectrum) and MBH/MQS = 0.62 (maximum to have a stable quasi-star) are reporte… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Extended best-fitting model of the LRD "the Cliff " (de Graaff et al. 2025c) and two other LRDs from our sample (MOM-292585 and ID-4490 from GO-2198; PI. L. Barrufet) also including MIRI photometry (that was not included in the fitting procedure). For reference, we also report the modified BB modelling by de Graaff et al. (2025b) as solid blue line. For "the Cliff ", we also report an inset with a zoom of … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of a LRD (JADES-GDS 13329) with mid-infrared ex￾cess at MIRI wavelengths not explainable with the simple quasi-star model but likely requiring an additional component of hot dust with T = 1100 K. We report the original Cloudy model in magenta, the ad￾ditional hot dust component in dashed red, and the composite model in violet. The photometric points are taken from the SMILES survey (Rieke et al. 20… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

(Abridged) Little Red Dots (LRDs) are a class of sources discovered by JWST observationally defined by a "V-shaped" rest-frame UV-Optical SED, a compact or unresolved morphology, and for having, frequently, broad hydrogen emission lines. Among various models, those involving a quasi-star interpret LRDs as an intermediate stage in the evolution of a super-massive black hole (SMBH) seed into a classic AGN. In this paper, we employ the radiative-transfer code \texttt{Cloudy} to study whether this model is able to reproduce the spectral features commonly observed in LRDs. The model consists of an accreting SMBH ($M_{\rm BH}\sim10^{5-6} \ M_\odot$) surrounded by a convective layer where a black-body (BB) spectrum with $T\sim5000 \ {\rm K}$ and $L\sim10^{44.4} \ {\rm erg \ s}^{-1}$ is produced. This BB is then reprocessed by a concentric thick ($\Delta R\sim1000 \ {\rm AU}$) shell of dense ($n_{\rm H}\sim10^{11} \ {\rm cm}^{-3}$) gas partially ionised by thermal collisions. The emerging radiation is further reprocessed by a diffuse clumpy medium surrounding the quasi-star. We fit this model to JWST/NIRSpec spectra of LRDs from the literature, deriving the main physical parameters and the SMBH masses. Once coupled with the UV emission from a host galaxy, this model is able to reproduce the shape of the UV-to-NIR continuum, including the presence of a Balmer break, as well as the luminosity of the hydrogen emission lines. However, this quasi-star model does not natively account for the presence of broad helium lines and for the possible presence of hot dust, needing additional components to match these observables. Our main result is to show how some LRDs can be modeled as quasi-stars, highlighting that a significant degeneracy exists among different LRD models. This has important consequences for our understanding of the mechanisms driving black hole growth in the early Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper models Little Red Dots (LRDs) as quasi-stars: an accreting SMBH (M_BH ~10^5-6 M_⊙) surrounded by a convective layer emitting a ~5000 K blackbody (L ~10^44.4 erg s^-1), reprocessed by a thick (ΔR ~1000 AU), dense (n_H ~10^11 cm^-3) partially ionized shell and a surrounding clumpy medium. Using Cloudy, the authors fit this setup to JWST/NIRSpec spectra of LRDs, add host-galaxy UV light, and report that the model reproduces the UV-to-NIR continuum shape (including Balmer break) and hydrogen-line luminosities. It does not reproduce broad He lines or hot dust without extra components. The conclusion is that some LRDs can be explained as quasi-stars and that significant degeneracy exists among LRD models.

Significance. If the reproduction holds after addressing parameter provenance, the work usefully demonstrates that a quasi-star reprocessing shell plus host UV can match selected LRD observables, thereby illustrating model degeneracy relevant to early SMBH growth. The explicit use of Cloudy and the listing of fitted parameters provide a concrete, reproducible starting point for future comparisons, though the current implementation does not yet deliver parameter-free predictions from quasi-star structure equations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / model description] Abstract and model-description paragraph: the reproduction of the UV-NIR continuum, Balmer break, and H-line luminosities is achieved only after choosing/fitting the five parameters M_BH, T_BB, L_BB, n_H, and ΔR (plus clumpy-medium properties) to the observed spectra. No derivation of these values from quasi-star envelope structure, accretion rate, or convective-layer equations is provided; the agreement is therefore partly by construction rather than an independent test of the quasi-star scenario.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the model 'derives the main physical parameters and the SMBH masses' requires clarification on how the fitted values are distinguished from the input choices, and whether any posterior uncertainties or degeneracy analysis (e.g., between shell density and host-galaxy contribution) are reported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the model 'does not natively account for' He lines and hot dust; a brief quantitative statement on the magnitude of the mismatch (e.g., line ratios or 3-5 μm excess) would help readers assess how severe the additional components must be.
  2. [Model description] Notation: the symbols M_BH, T, L, n_H, and ΔR are introduced without an explicit table or equation defining their adopted ranges and priors; adding such a summary would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our modeling. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / model description] Abstract and model-description paragraph: the reproduction of the UV-NIR continuum, Balmer break, and H-line luminosities is achieved only after choosing/fitting the five parameters M_BH, T_BB, L_BB, n_H, and ΔR (plus clumpy-medium properties) to the observed spectra. No derivation of these values from quasi-star envelope structure, accretion rate, or convective-layer equations is provided; the agreement is therefore partly by construction rather than an independent test of the quasi-star scenario.

    Authors: We agree that the listed parameters are fitted to the spectra within ranges motivated by quasi-star expectations rather than computed from the full set of envelope structure or accretion equations. The present work tests the viability of the reprocessing configuration using Cloudy, not a parameter-free prediction. We will revise the abstract and model-description sections to state explicitly that the parameters are obtained by fitting and that the exercise demonstrates the potential of the quasi-star picture while underscoring remaining degeneracies with other models. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the model 'derives the main physical parameters and the SMBH masses' requires clarification on how the fitted values are distinguished from the input choices, and whether any posterior uncertainties or degeneracy analysis (e.g., between shell density and host-galaxy contribution) are reported.

    Authors: The phrasing 'deriving' was intended to indicate that best-fit values for the physical quantities are obtained from the spectral fits. We will replace it with 'constraining via spectral fitting' to remove ambiguity. The manuscript already notes the necessity of an additional host-galaxy UV component and discusses parameter choices, but we will add a short paragraph on the main degeneracies (including between shell density and host contribution) and the absence of formal posterior uncertainties in this exploratory study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Reproduction of LRD spectra achieved by fitting 5+ free parameters (M_BH, T, L, n_H, ΔR) rather than deriving them from quasi-star structure

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We fit this model to JWST/NIRSpec spectra of LRDs from the literature, deriving the main physical parameters and the SMBH masses. Once coupled with the UV emission from a host galaxy, this model is able to reproduce the shape of the UV-to-NIR continuum, including the presence of a Balmer break, as well as the luminosity of the hydrogen emission lines."

    The five quantities (M_BH, T, L, n_H, ΔR) plus clumpy-medium properties are supplied as inputs to Cloudy and varied to match the target spectra; the claimed reproduction of continuum shape, Balmer break, and line luminosities is therefore the direct output of that fitting step rather than a quantity computed from quasi-star equations.

full rationale

The paper's central result is that the quasi-star model reproduces the UV-to-NIR continuum shape, Balmer break, and H-line luminosities. This is shown by running Cloudy with parameters chosen to match JWST spectra and adding a host-galaxy UV component. Because the listed values are inputs that are adjusted during the fit, the reported agreement reduces to the fitting procedure itself. No equations derive the parameter values from envelope structure, accretion rate, or convection; the exercise therefore demonstrates feasibility of a tuned reprocessor rather than an independent prediction. No self-citation chains or other enumerated circularity patterns appear in the abstract or model description.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on several adjustable physical parameters chosen to match data and on standard assumptions of radiative transfer in dense gas.

free parameters (5)
  • Black hole mass
    Set to 10^5-6 solar masses to produce the required accretion luminosity.
  • Blackbody temperature
    Fixed at ~5000 K for the convective layer emission.
  • Blackbody luminosity
    Set to ~10^44.4 erg/s.
  • Gas density
    Set to ~10^11 cm^-3 in the shell.
  • Shell thickness
    Set to ~1000 AU.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Radiative transfer through partially ionized dense gas can be accurately modeled by Cloudy under the assumed geometry and ionization sources.
    Invoked when simulating reprocessing of the blackbody by the shell and clumpy medium.
  • ad hoc to paper The quasi-star consists of an accreting SMBH surrounded by a convective layer and a thick partially ionized shell.
    Core structural assumption of the model.
invented entities (1)
  • Quasi-star structure (convective layer + dense shell + clumpy medium) no independent evidence
    purpose: To produce the observed V-shaped SED and Balmer break via reprocessing.
    Postulated configuration for LRDs; no independent evidence provided beyond the spectral fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6055 in / 1705 out tokens · 27667 ms · 2026-06-28T00:24:24.238892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Little Red Dots as Intermediate Mass, Super-Eddington Engines: Insights from Type IIn Supernovae and The 1837-1856 Great Eruption of $\eta$ Carinae

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs are reinterpreted as intermediate-mass super-Eddington systems with wind-driven pseudo-photospheres that explain their spectra and imply engine masses below 10^5 solar masses rather than overmassive black holes.

  2. JWST Reveals Compact Nuclear Starbursts Masquerading as AGNs in Metal-Poor Dwarfs: Where Are the Accreting Intermediate-Mass Black Holes?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Compact nuclear starbursts in metal-poor dwarfs produce AGN-like mid-IR colors without accretion, as revealed by JWST observations of two such galaxies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Adams, W. M. & Petrosian, V . 1974, ApJ, 192, 199

    1974

  2. [2]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 224

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 224

    2024

  3. [3]

    & Netzer, H

    Almog, Y . & Netzer, H. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 57

    1989

  4. [4]

    T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJ, 969, L18

    2024

  5. [5]

    Baggen, J. F. W., Scoggins, M. T., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02702

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, L13

    2024

  7. [7]

    G., Kocevski, D., et al

    Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., Pérez-González, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 48

    2026

  9. [9]

    1987, ApJ, 320, 537

    Barvainis, R. 1987, ApJ, 320, 537

    1987

  10. [10]

    Begelman, M. C. & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48

    2026

  11. [11]

    C., Rossi, E

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649

    2008

  12. [12]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92

    2024

  13. [13]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.11677

    Billand, J.-B., Elbaz, D., Franco, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.11677

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.04011

    Billand, J.-B., Elbaz, D., Gentile, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.04011

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools

    2023

  16. [16]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

    2000

  17. [17]

    Carnall, A. C. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.05165

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, L4

    2024

  19. [19]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  20. [20]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.08768

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.08768

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15935

    arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700

    arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    & Gunn, J

    Conroy, C. & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833

    2010

  24. [24]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486

    2009

  25. [25]

    Coughlin, E. R. & Begelman, M. C. 2024, ApJ, 970, 158

    2024

  26. [26]

    & Maiolino, R

    Dayal, P. & Maiolino, R. 2026, A&A, 706, A72 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025c, A&A, 701, A168

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    2025, A&A, 704, A313 D’Eugenio, F., Nelson, E., Ji, X., et al

    Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A313 D’Eugenio, F., Nelson, E., Ji, X., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.00101

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6 Euclid Collaboration: Bisigello, L., Rodighiero, G., Fotopoulou, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15323

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    J., Korista, K

    Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761

    1998

  30. [30]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, L4

    2025

  31. [31]

    H., Culhane, J

    Gabriel, A. H., Culhane, J. L., Patchett, B. E., et al. 1995, Advances in Space Research, 15, 63

    1995

  32. [32]

    2026, A&A, 706, A364

    Gandolfi, G., Rodighiero, G., Castellano, M., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A364

    2026

  33. [33]

    Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122

    2005

  34. [34]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

    2024

  35. [35]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 129

    2026

  36. [36]

    M., van Hoof, P

    Gunasekera, C. M., van Hoof, P. A. M., Dehghanian, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2508.01102

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A60

    2025

  38. [38]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57

    2025

  39. [39]

    R., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Ivey, L. R., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09177

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

    2025

  41. [41]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    L., Kocevski, D

    Jones, B. L., Kocevski, D. D., Pacucci, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.07376

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407

    2025

  44. [44]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126

    2025

  45. [45]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, L4

    2023

  46. [46]

    & Harikane, Y

    Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y . 2025, ApJ, 995, 24

    2025

  47. [47]

    & Silk, J

    Kritos, K. & Silk, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.21709

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92 Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266

    2025

  49. [49]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047

    Lambrides, E., Garofali, K., Larson, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y .-F., Quataert, E., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    P., Secunda, A., et al

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15962

    Ma, Z., Egami, E., Zhu, Y ., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15962

    arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    & Maiolino, R

    Madau, P. & Maiolino, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22386

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921

    2025

  56. [56]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

    2024

  57. [57]

    P., Kotiwale, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Kotiwale, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 246

    2025

  58. [58]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

    arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    D., Antonucci, E., Newmark, J., et al

    Moses, J. D., Antonucci, E., Newmark, J., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1134

    2020

  60. [60]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nu- clei

    1989

  62. [62]

    Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  63. [63]

    Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368

    arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    2023, ApJ, 957, L3

    Pacucci, F., Nguyen, B., Carniani, S., Maiolino, R., & Fan, X. 2023, ApJ, 957, L3

    2023

  65. [65]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.14233 Pérez-González, P

    Park, K., Torralba, A., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.14233 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4 Pérez-González, P. G., Östlin, G., Costantin, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 179

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    F., Schaye, J., et al

    Pizzati, E., Hennawi, J. F., Schaye, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2910 Planck Collaboration: Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., Ashdown, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6

    2025

  67. [67]

    Reines, A. E. & V olonteri, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, 82

    2015

  68. [68]

    H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al

    Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 83

    2024

  69. [69]

    Riffel, R., Rodríguez-Ardila, A., & Pastoriza, M. G. 2006, A&A, 457, 61

    2006

  70. [70]

    H., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Bonaventura, N., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 71

    2025

  71. [71]

    2026, ApJ, 1003, 234

    Ronayne, K., Papovich, C., Kirkpatrick, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 234

    2026

  72. [72]

    H., et al

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18864

    arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    & Inayoshi, K

    Takasao, S. & Inayoshi, K. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21589

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D

    Taylor, A. J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, L7

    2025

  76. [76]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.28335

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Weibel, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.28335

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830

    Tripodi, R., Martis, N., Markov, V ., et al. 2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830

    2025

  78. [78]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 183

    Umeda, H., Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y ., & Murase, K. 2026, ApJ, 999, 183

    2026

  79. [79]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 34

    2024

  80. [80]

    A., Bing, L., et al

    Xiao, M., Oesch, P. A., Bing, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A231

    2025

Showing first 80 references.