pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30711 · v1 · pith:AI5UFBN2new · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR

Little Red Dots as Intermediate Mass, Super-Eddington Engines: Insights from Type IIn Supernovae and The 1837-1856 Great Eruption of η Carinae

Rohan P. Naidu , Jorryt Matthee , Anna de Graaff , Alberto Torralba , Chris Ashall , Harley Katz , John Chisholm , Gabriel Brammer
show 15 more authors
Luc Dessart Anna-Christina Eilers Raphael E. Hviding David O. Jones Vasily Kokorev Joel Leja Hanpu Liu Zhaoran Liu Devesh Nandal Pascal A. Oesch Conor L. Ransome Robert A. Simcoe Wendy Q. Sun Andrea Weibel Mengyuan Xiao
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords little red dotsintermediate mass black holessuper-Eddington accretioneta Carinaetype IIn supernovaeJWST galaxiesblack hole seedsoutflow winds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little Red Dots are powered by intermediate-mass super-Eddington engines whose wind outflows produce the observed pseudo-photospheres and broad lines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the distinctive spectral and photometric properties of JWST Little Red Dots match those seen during the 1837-1856 Great Eruption of η Carinae and in Type IIn supernovae. In both cases, outflows from a central source become trapped in a dense circumstellar envelope, forming a pseudo-photosphere that hides the engine while radiation from below powers the system. Broad lines arise from electron scattering and absorption in the clumpy wind rather than from virial motion around a black hole. Scaling an escape-velocity argument to the observed line widths then caps the central mass at less than 10^5 solar masses. The model favors objects in the 10^3-10^6 solar-mass range accreting at more than five times the Eddington rate, which could be either supermassive stars or intermediate-mass black holes, and sketches how dust formation in the envelope could mark the transition to classical AGN.

Core claim

LRDs arise when outflows from an intermediate-mass central engine build a dense, slow wind that forms an obscuring pseudo-photosphere; radiation from the buried engine powers the system while fast winds crashing into the envelope produce shocks, and lines form via electron scattering and absorption in the clumpy medium above the photosphere. This wind-like physics, rather than a virial broad-line region, accounts for the spectra, and an escape-velocity argument applied to the line widths limits the engine mass to M < 10^5 M_⊙, favoring super-Eddington (L_bol/L_edd ≳ 5) systems with M ≈ 10^3-6 M_⊙ that are either supermassive stars or IMBHs.

What carries the argument

Escape-velocity mass constraint applied to broad lines interpreted as forming in a slow, dense outflow wind rather than a virialized broad-line region, scaled from the outflow-enshrouded pseudo-photosphere seen in η Carinae and Type IIn supernovae.

If this is right

  • Virial black-hole mass estimates for LRDs are systematically too high because the lines trace wind motion instead of orbital motion.
  • The central engines have masses between roughly 10^3 and 10^6 solar masses and radiate at more than five times the Eddington luminosity.
  • Dust condensation in the expanding envelope will eventually allow the central engine to become visible as a classical AGN.
  • The large size and low surface gravity of the photosphere naturally explain the lack of observed variability.
  • LRDs represent an early, enshrouded phase that can grow into more massive black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, LRDs would supply a population of intermediate-mass seeds that can grow into the supermassive black holes observed at lower redshifts.
  • The same wind-envelope physics might explain other compact, red, high-redshift sources that lack strong variability.
  • Future spectroscopy could test whether the line ratios and absorption features match the clumpy-wind predictions calibrated on η Carinae.

Load-bearing premise

That the spectra and photometry of LRDs are generated by the same outflow-trapped pseudo-photosphere mechanism that operates on stellar scales in η Carinae and Type IIn supernovae, without extra galactic-scale effects or different geometries.

What would settle it

Observation of rapid variability on timescales much shorter than the light-crossing time of a large, low-gravity photosphere, or line profiles that cannot be reproduced by electron scattering plus absorption in a clumpy ionized-neutral wind.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30711 by Alberto Torralba, Andrea Weibel, Anna-Christina Eilers, Anna de Graaff, Chris Ashall, Conor L. Ransome, David O. Jones, Devesh Nandal, Gabriel Brammer, Hanpu Liu, Harley Katz, Joel Leja, John Chisholm, Jorryt Matthee, Luc Dessart, Mengyuan Xiao, Pascal A. Oesch, Raphael E. Hviding, Robert A. Simcoe, Rohan P. Naidu, Vasily Kokorev, Wendy Q. Sun, Zhaoran Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: — LRDs, Type IIn SNe, and the GE span 4 dex in bolometric luminosity (Lbol) but cluster in effective temperature (Teff ). The GE (blue star) displays a blackbody-like continuum of Teff ≈ 5000 − 6000 K (Rest et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2018) similar to the ≈ 500 Type IIn SNe (dark orange) compiled in Hiramatsu et al. (2024) and LRDs (red dots) from de Graaff et al. (2025b). The Hiramatsu et al. (2024) IIn SNe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: — The remarkable similarity in Hα line profiles of the GE, Type IIn SNe, and LRDs. Top: In the CSM interaction phase of the GE, the line is characterized by electron scattered wings and blue-shifted Balmer absorption. Profile recon￾structed from parameters reported in Smith et al. (2018), matched in resolution and noise properties to the JWST/NIRSpec LRD spectrum in the bottom panel. Center: Type IIn SNe (… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: — Subtle trends in Balmer series line profiles are shared between LRDs and IIn SNe. Top: Peak-normalized, continuum-subtracted Balmer lines are shown for GN-9771 (Torralba et al. 2025) and SN2009kn (Kankare et al. 2012). Bottom: Following Matthee et al. (2026), a model for the exponential wings (and host galaxy in the case of the LRD) is subtracted from the data. This leaves behind a P-Cygni-like profile, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — Electron scattering explains broad lines in IIn SNe (and LRDs). Models from Dessart et al. (2009) designed to reproduce SN1994W are shown for illustration. The degree of elec￾tron scattering increases down the Balmer series. This is exactly what is observed in LRDs, where Hβ consistently shows broader exponential wings than Hα (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — LRD-like pseudo-photospheric features highlighted in SN2009kn (orange; R ≈ 8800 (5500) at ≳ 5500˚A (≲ 5500˚A); Kankare et al. 2012). Top: The overall continuum shape at ≳ 4500˚A is well-described by a single-temperature blackbody akin to LRDs (e.g., de Graaff et al. 2025b; Sun et al. 2026). LRDs have sharper Balmer breaks than observed in SNe, but it is interesting to note that a Balmer break and a rollo… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — Phases of Type IIn SNe evolution may help interpret sub-classes of LRDs. Left: The initial shock breakout or “flash” phase of IIn SNe (blue; Ihanec et al. 2024) is marked by high ionization lines such as He II with the Balmer lines showing no absorption. These are the defining features of the bluest LRDs (e.g., Matthee et al. 2026; Brazzini et al. 2026). In the much longer-lived interaction phase (orange… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — The MIR spectrum of Type IIn SNe may help illuminate the MIR of LRDs. We show an illustrative fit to SN2010jl (Andrews et al. 2011) with the typical components included in such modeling (e.g., DerKacy et al. 2026; Medler et al. 2025). The key features in the MIR include a blackbody representing the pseudo-photosphere (Teff = 7300 K; gray), free-free emission (T = 20, 000 K; purple), Carbon dust (T = 550 … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: — Schematic of the proposed LRD scenario inspired by Type IIn SNe and the GE. Figure modeled after scenarios in Smith (2013, 2017); Smith et al. (2018). Left: Prior to the LRD phase, the central engine drives a slowly outflowing envelope of gas that we refer to as the “cold wind” (crimson with outward arrows). An optically thick pseudo-photosphere (white dashed lines) obscures the hot surface of the star a… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: — Defining vblue,95% to trace the fastest outflowing cold wind component for the escape velocity argument. Top: As in Matthee et al. (2026), we model the wings of the line profile as an exponential (green dashed line). Center: Subtract￾ing the model for the exponential leaves us with a P-Cygni profile resembling a massive star wind. We model this profile as a combi￾nation of absorption (Voigt profile; gray… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: — “Overmassive” no more – central engine mass vs. stellar mass for the typical LRD. We display parameters estimated for the stack of 98 LRDs from Sun et al. (2026) (black stars) that were decomposed into a host galaxy and a central engine. The stellar mass is based on SED fitting and validated by clustering measurements (e.g., Matthee et al. 2025; Lin et al. 2025; Pizzati et al. 2025). Our inferred centra… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

JWST's Little Red Dots (LRDs) display a unique constellation of features that do not occur simultaneously in any other class of galaxies or AGN. Here we observe that many of these features find parallels in the 19th century Great Eruption (GE) of $\eta$ Carinae and a sub-class of supernovae (Type IIn). Drawing on these stellar phenomena -- outflows trapped by dense circumstellar gas envelopes -- we sketch a possible scenario for LRDs. Outflows from the central engine produce an enshrouding envelope of gas that may be thought of as a slow wind. This dense wind and its enormous extent produce an opacity so high that a pseudo-photosphere forms within the wind, obscuring the central engine and manifesting as a blackbody-like continuum. Radiation from the buried engine powers the system. The engine may also launch fast winds that crash into the existing envelope to generate shocks. Lines form within the wind above the photosphere -- electron scattering and absorption in the clumpy (ionized + neutral) medium account for broad wings and P-Cygni cores. A key implication is that inferences of ``overmassive black holes" may be interpreting this wind-like physics as a virial broad-line region. We propose an escape velocity argument to constrain the mass of the engine, which yields $M<10^{5} M_\odot$ for the typical LRD. The lack of variability and low surface gravity of the photosphere provide further support for intermediate mass ($M\approx10^{3-6} M_\odot$), but very luminous super-Eddington ($L_{\rm{bol}}/L_{\rm{edd}}\gtrsim5$) systems harboring a supermassive star or intermediate mass black hole. Paralleling the evolution of IIn SNe, dust production in the envelope may mark the beginnings of classical AGN. This paper explores a possible self-consistent explanation for the entire life-cycle of LRDs, from their enshrouding in dense gas to their fates as seeds of massive black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that JWST Little Red Dots (LRDs) are powered by intermediate-mass (M ≈ 10^{3-6} M_⊙), super-Eddington (L_bol/L_edd ≳ 5) engines—either supermassive stars or IMBHs—whose outflows create a dense, enshrouding wind envelope that forms a pseudo-photosphere. This produces the observed blackbody-like continuum while broad lines arise from electron scattering and absorption in the clumpy medium above the photosphere, analogous to the 1837-1856 Great Eruption of η Carinae and Type IIn supernovae. The model reinterprets broad-line widths as wind features rather than virial motions, yielding an escape-velocity mass upper limit M < 10^5 M_⊙, and sketches an evolutionary sequence toward classical AGN via dust formation in the envelope.

Significance. If the scaling of the stellar wind-photosphere physics to galactic scales can be validated, the result would be significant for reinterpreting LRD demographics and black-hole seeding at high redshift, offering a self-consistent alternative to overmassive-BH interpretations and a potential life-cycle link to AGN. The qualitative parallels are suggestive, but the absence of quantitative radiative-transfer calculations or scale-invariance tests currently limits the strength of the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / escape-velocity argument] Abstract and main-text escape-velocity argument: the mass bound M < 10^5 M_⊙ is obtained from M < v_line² R_phot / (2G) where both v_line and R_phot (from L_bol and T) are inferred from the same spectral features the wind model is invoked to explain; this circularity is load-bearing for the central mass constraint and is not mitigated by any explicit derivation or error propagation in the text.
  2. [Main text (qualitative parallels)] Main text (qualitative parallels section): the claim that LRD spectral and photometric features arise from the same outflow-enshrouded pseudo-photosphere physics as η Car and IIn SNe assumes invariance of the v_esc relation under a ~10^6 size increase and different galactic potentials, yet no radiative-transfer models, predicted line-profile comparisons, or tests of the three required conditions (line-forming gas at the continuum photosphere, velocity set by local escape speed, negligible additional galactic effects) are supplied.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The notation for the Eddington ratio threshold (L_bol/L_edd ≳ 5) and the precise definition of the pseudo-photosphere radius are introduced without a dedicated equation or table summarizing the adopted parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our conceptual framework. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / escape-velocity argument] Abstract and main-text escape-velocity argument: the mass bound M < 10^5 M_⊙ is obtained from M < v_line² R_phot / (2G) where both v_line and R_phot (from L_bol and T) are inferred from the same spectral features the wind model is invoked to explain; this circularity is load-bearing for the central mass constraint and is not mitigated by any explicit derivation or error propagation in the text.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point on potential circularity. The escape-velocity bound is presented as a consistency check under the wind-photosphere interpretation, where line widths are reinterpreted as wind features rather than virial motions. To address this, we will add an explicit derivation of the mass formula in the revised text, including the steps from observed L_bol and T to R_phot, the assumption that v_line traces local escape speed at the photosphere, and a basic error propagation to quantify the M < 10^5 M_⊙ limit. This will make the logical structure transparent without claiming the bound as fully independent. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Main text (qualitative parallels)] Main text (qualitative parallels section): the claim that LRD spectral and photometric features arise from the same outflow-enshrouded pseudo-photosphere physics as η Car and IIn SNe assumes invariance of the v_esc relation under a ~10^6 size increase and different galactic potentials, yet no radiative-transfer models, predicted line-profile comparisons, or tests of the three required conditions (line-forming gas at the continuum photosphere, velocity set by local escape speed, negligible additional galactic effects) are supplied.

    Authors: The manuscript is explicitly framed as a qualitative sketch drawing physical analogies, not a quantitative model. We agree that full radiative-transfer calculations, line-profile predictions, and explicit tests of scale invariance would strengthen the case but lie beyond the paper's scope. In revision we will expand the parallels section to state the three conditions explicitly, note the assumed invariance of the wind-photosphere physics, and clarify that the work is hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. No new calculations will be added at this stage. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain.

full rationale

The manuscript sketches an analogy-based scenario for LRDs drawing on external stellar phenomena (η Carinae Great Eruption and Type IIn SNe) and proposes an escape-velocity mass argument yielding M < 10^5 M_⊙. No equations, self-citations, or load-bearing steps are present in the provided text that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The central mass constraint is framed as a proposal under the adopted model rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or a self-definitional loop. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The scenario rests on the untested premise that stellar-scale outflow physics scales directly to galactic nuclei without additional degrees of freedom; the escape-velocity mass bound implicitly treats wind radius and velocity as directly measurable from the data without geometric corrections.

free parameters (2)
  • Eddington ratio threshold (L_bol/L_edd ≳ 5)
    Chosen to classify the systems as super-Eddington; value is stated but not derived from first principles or fitted to a specific dataset in the abstract.
  • Mass upper limit (M < 10^5 M_⊙)
    Derived from escape-velocity argument whose exact inputs (radius, velocity) are not numerically specified in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The observed LRD continuum and line profiles are produced by a pseudo-photosphere within a dense, slow wind rather than by a standard accretion disk or virial broad-line region.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the central physical picture that allows the stellar analogies to be applied.
  • domain assumption Stellar-wind and supernova-envelope physics can be scaled to the sizes and luminosities of LRDs without modification for galactic gravity or radiation transport differences.
    Required for the escape-velocity mass constraint and the evolutionary link to AGN to hold.
invented entities (1)
  • Pseudo-photosphere within the LRD wind envelope no independent evidence
    purpose: To explain the blackbody-like continuum and obscuration of the central engine
    Postulated by direct analogy to η Carinae; no independent falsifiable signature (e.g., predicted size or temperature evolution) is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6055 in / 2101 out tokens · 41524 ms · 2026-07-01T02:12:20.988930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

244 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D., Vanzella, E., et al

    Adamo, A., Bradley, L. D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, Nature, 632, 513

    2024

  2. [2]

    2014, Science, 345, 1330

    Alexander, T., & Natarajan, P. 2014, Science, 345, 1330

    2014

  3. [3]

    Algera, H. S. B., Rowland, L., Stefanon, M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf1897

    2026

  4. [4]

    Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJ, 969, L18

    2024

  5. [5]

    Ando, M., Harikane, Y., Katz, H., Inayoshi, K., & Tanaka, T. S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.03522

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    E., Clayton, G

    Andrews, J. E., Clayton, G. C., Wesson, R., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 45 Anthropic. 2025, Claude Opus 4.7, Large language model, https://www.anthropic.com/claude, accessed: 2026-05-03

    2011

  7. [7]

    J., et al

    Aretxaga, I., Benetti, S., Terlevich, R. J., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 343

    1999

  8. [8]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33 Ba˜ nados, E., Venemans, B. P., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 473

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    G., Kocevski, D., et al

    Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 2174

    Baumgardt, H. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2174

    2017

  11. [11]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.09085

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    C., Rossi, E

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649

    2008

  13. [13]

    C., Volonteri, M., & Rees, M

    Begelman, M. C., Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 289

    2006

  14. [14]

    Deason, A. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611

    2018

  15. [15]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 4456 —

    Belokurov, V., & Kravtsov, A. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4456 —. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3198

    2023

  16. [16]

    C., Denney, K

    Bentz, M. C., Denney, K. D., Grier, C. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 149

    2013

  17. [17]

    Do little red dots really form a distinct class of astronomical objects?

    Billand, J.-B., Elbaz, D., Franco, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.11677

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 , url =

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 2023

  19. [19]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, L167 —

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167 —. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.22214

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    R., Simons, R

    Brooks, M., Trump, J. R., Simons, R. C., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.19609

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16082

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    B., Perna, R., et al

    Cantiello, M., Hassan, J. B., Perna, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.17997

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, L61

    2025

  24. [24]

    2018, Space Sci

    Chandra, P. 2018, Space Sci. Rev., 214, 27

    2018

  25. [25]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.08768

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.08768

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7

    2023

  27. [27]

    2026, ApJ, 1003, L46

    Chen, Y.-X., Liu, H., Li, R., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, L46

    2026

  28. [28]

    A., & Irwin, C

    Chevalier, R. A., & Irwin, C. M. 2012, ApJ, 747, L17

    2012

  29. [29]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15935

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    N., Blinnikov, S

    Chugai, N. N., Blinnikov, S. I., Cumming, R. J., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1213

    2004

  31. [31]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Messa, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535

    2025

  32. [32]

    JADES Data Release 4 Paper I: Sample Selection, Observing Strategy and Redshifts of the complete spectroscopic sample

    Curtis-Lake, E., Cameron, A. J., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2026, MNRAS, arXiv:2510.01033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    1987, ApJ, 317, 760

    Davidson, K. 1987, ApJ, 317, 760

    1987

  34. [34]

    2016, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol

    Davidson, K. 2016, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 728, Journal of Physics Conference Series (IOP), 022008

    2016

  35. [35]

    D., & Vink, J

    Davies, B., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Vink, J. S. 2005, A&A, 439, 1107

    2005

  36. [36]

    OCEANS of Absorption: High-resolution NIRSpec Spectroscopy Reveals Diverse Balmer-line Absorption in Little Red Dots

    Davis, K., Brooks, M., Simons, R. C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.00258 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16600 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820 20 Naidu et al

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    2025, A&A, 704, A313

    Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A313

    2025

  38. [38]

    A., & Hartwick, F

    Denissenkov, P. A., & Hartwick, F. D. A. 2014, MNRAS, 437, L21

    2014

  39. [39]

    M., Ashall, C., Baron, E., et al

    DerKacy, J. M., Ashall, C., Baron, E., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 179

    2026

  40. [40]

    Dessart, L., Audit, E., & Hillier, D. J. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 449, 4304

    2015

  41. [41]

    Dessart, L., & Hillier, D. J. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 57 —. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1739

    2008

  42. [42]

    J., Audit, E., Livne, E., & Waldman, R

    Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Audit, E., Livne, E., & Waldman, R. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2094

    2016

  43. [43]

    J., Gezari, S., Basa, S., & Matheson, T

    Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Gezari, S., Basa, S., & Matheson, T. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 21

    2009

  44. [44]

    SN2023ixf: Radiative-transfer modeling of the photospheric phase evolution from the ultraviolet to the infrared

    Dessart, L., Jacobson-Galan, W. V., Bostroem, K. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05145 D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Perna, M., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.11752 D’Eugenio, F., Nelson, E., Ji, X., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.00101 Dias dos Santos, D., Panda, S., Rodr´ ıguez-Ardila, A., &

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Simultaneous modeling of FeII emission in the optical and near-infrared in a prototypical Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy

    Marinello, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.30477

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    A., & Ulrich, R

    Drake, S. A., & Ulrich, R. K. 1980, ApJS, 42, 351

    1980

  47. [47]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6

    2026

  48. [48]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 4528

    Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 4528

    2019

  49. [49]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01905

    Whitler, L. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01905

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Fan, X., Ba˜ nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 373

    2023

  51. [51]

    K., Lupton, R

    Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Lupton, R. H., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2833

    2001

  52. [52]

    Fassia, A., Meikle, W. P. S., Chugai, N., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 907

    2001

  53. [53]

    Filippenko, A. V. 1989, AJ, 97, 726

    1989

  54. [54]

    D., Chevalier, R

    Fox, O. D., Chevalier, R. A., Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 7

    2011

  55. [55]

    D., Fransson, C., Smith, N., et al

    Fox, O. D., Fransson, C., Smith, N., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 517

    2020

  56. [56]

    A., Filippenko, A

    Fransson, C., Chevalier, R. A., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 350

    2002

  57. [57]

    J., et al

    Fransson, C., Ergon, M., Challis, P. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 118

    2014

  58. [58]

    2026, Nature Astronomy, arXiv:2512.02096

    Fu, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, D., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, arXiv:2512.02096

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Kohno, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57

    2024

  61. [61]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    2025

  62. [62]

    2014, Nature, 511, 326

    Gall, C., Hjorth, J., Watson, D., et al. 2014, Nature, 511, 326

    2014

  63. [63]

    The quasi-star model for Little Red Dots: potential and challenges

    Gentile, F., Giavalisco, M., Daddi, E., et al. 2026, The quasi-star model for Little Red Dots: potential and challenges, arXiv:2606.06575

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Gieles, M., Charbonnel, C., Krause, M. G. H., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2461

    2018

  65. [65]

    Grandi, S. A. 1980, ApJ, 238, 10

    1980

  66. [66]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2006, ApJ, 641, L21

    2006

  67. [67]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257

    2020

  68. [68]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05434

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    A Rapid Evolution in the Observed Mbh/M* Relation at z > 3 Revealed via Spectro-photometric SED-Modeling

    Gupta, A. R., Taylor, A., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.30414 Haemmerl´ e, L. 2021, A&A, 650, A204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Hall, P. B. 2007, AJ, 133, 1271

    2007

  71. [71]

    B., Brandt, W

    Hall, P. B., Brandt, W. N., Petitjean, P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 222

    2013

  72. [72]

    W., & Frew, D

    Hamacher, D. W., & Frew, D. J. 2010, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 13, 220

    2010

  73. [73]

    2024, A&A, 688, A105

    Hawcroft, C., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A105

    2024

  74. [74]

    H., et al

    Helmi, A., Babusiaux, C., Koppelman, H. H., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 85

    2018

  75. [75]

    J., Davidson, K., Ishibashi, K., & Gull, T

    Hillier, D. J., Davidson, K., Ishibashi, K., & Gull, T. 2001, ApJ, 553, 837

    2001

  76. [76]

    J., & Dessart, L

    Hillier, D. J., & Dessart, L. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 252

    2012

  77. [77]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 4276

    Smith, N. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 4276

    2021

  78. [78]

    Type IIn Supernovae. I. Uniform Light-curve Characterization and a Bimodality in the Radiated Energy Distribution

    Hiramatsu, D., Berger, E., Gomez, S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07287

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    F., Grudic, M

    Hopkins, P. F., Grudic, M. Y., Su, K.-Y., et al. 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 18

    2024

  80. [80]

    M., & Davidson, K

    Humphreys, R. M., & Davidson, K. 1994, PASP, 106, 1025

    1994

Showing first 80 references.