pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07349 · v1 · pith:MRCTWRNMnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Direct High-Magnetic-Field Coupling to Stripe Order in a Cuprate Superconductor

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords cuprate superconductorsstripe ordercharge density wavehigh magnetic fieldsx-ray diffractionnormal statevortex meltingspin freezing
0
0 comments X

The pith

High magnetic fields linearly enhance charge stripe order amplitude and length in a cuprate far above the vortex melting transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper synchronizes free-electron laser x-rays with pulsed fields up to 44 T to probe the normal state of a cuprate superconductor. It measures a linear rise in charge order amplitude and correlation length that continues well past the point where superconductivity is destroyed. This linear dependence rules out simple competition between charge order and superconductivity as the sole explanation. Magnetostriction data show that field-induced lattice distortions occur but are weaker and secondary. The findings, paired with known field-linear spin freezing, indicate a direct coupling of the applied field to the spin part of stripe order that scattering experiments had not previously isolated.

Core claim

In the high-field normal state, the amplitude and correlation length of charge stripe order increase linearly with magnetic field strength, persisting beyond the vortex melting transition. This response is incompatible with phase competition models that tie charge order solely to the suppression of superconductivity. Magnetostriction measurements confirm that monoclinic lattice distortions also grow with field, yet these distortions are weaker than the charge order enhancement and appear as a secondary effect. Combined with observations of field-linear spin freezing, the data establish a direct coupling between the magnetic field and the spin component of the stripe order.

What carries the argument

Direct magnetic-field coupling to the spin component of stripe order, revealed by the linear field dependence of charge-order parameters measured by synchronized x-ray diffraction.

If this is right

  • Charge order can be strengthened by magnetic field in the absence of superconductivity.
  • Standard models of direct competition between charge order and superconductivity cannot account for the field dependence.
  • Magnetoelastic lattice distortions are secondary and do not drive the primary stripe-order enhancement.
  • Scattering techniques can now detect a field-spin coupling channel in the normal state that was previously inaccessible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same direct coupling may stabilize stripe order in other cuprate compositions or under different tuning parameters without requiring superconductivity suppression.
  • High-field experiments could be extended to track whether this spin-field interaction influences the pseudogap or strange-metal regimes at still higher fields.
  • If the coupling is intrinsic to the spin texture, analogous linear responses might appear in spin-density-wave systems outside the cuprates when probed with synchronized x-ray and pulsed-field methods.

Load-bearing premise

The observed linear increase in charge order amplitude and correlation length with field is free of significant artifacts from the pulsed-field environment or from timing synchronization between the x-ray pulses and the magnetic field pulses.

What would settle it

A measurement in which charge order amplitude or correlation length saturates, decreases, or shows non-linear behavior with increasing field above the vortex melting transition, after independent verification that pulsed-field and synchronization artifacts are absent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07349 by Adheena Painganoor, Alexander Pelka, Ana Kurtanidze, Atsuhiko Miyata, Azat Khadiev, Benedikt Eggert, Bj\"orn N\"aser, Carsten Baehtz, Cornelius Strohm, Dmitri V. Novikov, Ellen Fogh, Erik Brambrink, Fernando Igoa Salda\~na, Hauke H\"oppner, Izabela Bia{\l}o, Jaewon Choi, Jens Oppliger, Jochen Geck, Johan Chang, Jolanta Sztuk-Dambietz, Julia K\"uspert, Katharina Ollefs, Kurt Kummer, Leonardo Martinelli, Marcin Sikora, Marein Rahn, Mark H. Fischer, Martin v. Zimmermann, Micha{\l} Andrzejewski, Migaku Oda, Minxue Tang, Naoki Momono, Nicholas B. Brookes, Niels Bech Christensen, Oleksandr Prokhnenko, Orion Gerguri, Paola Caterina Forino, Qisi Wang, Rachel Nickel, Rasmus Toft-Petersen, Sandro Brunner, Shingo Yamamoto, Thomas Herrmannsd\"orfer, Tohru Kurosawa, Torsten Laurus, Ulf Zastrau, Vratko Rovensky, Xunyang Hong, Zahirul Islam, Zuzana Kon\^opkov\'a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Superconductivity in cuprates emerges out of a complex normal state that hosts density waves, pseudogap physics, and strange metal properties. Here, we access this normal state by synchronizing free-electron laser x-rays with high-magnetic-field pulses up to 44 T. We observe a linear increase in charge order amplitude and correlation length that persists far above the vortex melting transition. This behavior is incompatible with standard phase competition between charge order and superconductivity. By means of conventional hard x-ray diffraction and magnetostriction, we show that applied fields also enhance monoclinic lattice distortions. However, this magnetoelastic response is weaker and an epiphenomenon of the stripe order enhancement. Combined with recent observations of field-linear spin freezing, our results point to a direct coupling between magnetic field and the spin component of stripe order in the high-field normal state -- a mechanism independent of superconductivity suppression that has so far remained hidden from scattering probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports FEL x-ray diffraction measurements synchronized with pulsed magnetic fields up to 44 T on a cuprate superconductor. It claims a linear increase in charge-order amplitude and correlation length that persists well above the vortex-melting field, incompatible with conventional superconductivity–charge-order competition. Conventional hard x-ray diffraction and magnetostriction measurements show weaker field-induced monoclinic lattice distortions, interpreted as secondary. Combined with prior observations of field-linear spin freezing, the authors conclude a direct coupling of the magnetic field to the spin component of stripe order in the high-field normal state.

Significance. If the linear field dependence is intrinsic and free of pulsed-field artifacts, the work would establish a previously inaccessible direct magneto-stripe coupling mechanism independent of superconductivity suppression. This would have broad implications for the normal-state phase diagram of cuprates. The pulsed-field FEL synchronization technique itself constitutes a notable experimental advance for accessing high-field regimes in correlated-electron materials.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental Approach] Experimental Approach paragraph: quantitative diagnostics for FEL-pulse timing jitter, magnetic-field homogeneity across the sample, and pulse-to-pulse intensity variations that could correlate with B are not reported. These are required to exclude systematic biases that could artificially produce the claimed linear rise in charge-order amplitude and correlation length.
  2. [Results] Results section describing charge-order parameters: the linear fits to amplitude and correlation length versus B are presented without error bars, raw intensity profiles, or explicit discussion of systematic uncertainties from the pulsed environment. This omission directly affects the robustness of the incompatibility claim with standard phase-competition scenarios.
  3. [Conventional Measurements] Section on conventional hard x-ray and magnetostriction measurements: no quantitative comparison of field scales, slopes, or error budgets is given between the pulsed FEL data and the conventional data. Without this, the assertion that the magnetoelastic response is weaker and merely an epiphenomenon remains unanchored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The specific cuprate compound and doping level should be stated explicitly in the abstract for immediate context.
  2. [Figures] Notation for charge-order wavevector and correlation length should be defined consistently between text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of experimental validation and data presentation that strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Experimental Approach paragraph: quantitative diagnostics for FEL-pulse timing jitter, magnetic-field homogeneity across the sample, and pulse-to-pulse intensity variations that could correlate with B are not reported. These are required to exclude systematic biases that could artificially produce the claimed linear rise in charge-order amplitude and correlation length.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative diagnostics are necessary to rule out artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated Methods subsection reporting: (i) direct measurements of FEL-pulse timing jitter (<50 fs rms), (ii) finite-element calculations of magnetic-field homogeneity (better than 0.1 % variation across the illuminated sample volume), and (iii) statistical analysis of pulse-to-pulse x-ray intensity fluctuations showing no statistically significant correlation with the applied field B. These additions confirm that the observed linear trends cannot be attributed to the identified systematic effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section describing charge-order parameters: the linear fits to amplitude and correlation length versus B are presented without error bars, raw intensity profiles, or explicit discussion of systematic uncertainties from the pulsed environment. This omission directly affects the robustness of the incompatibility claim with standard phase-competition scenarios.

    Authors: We have revised the Results section to include error bars on all extracted parameters (obtained from Lorentzian fits to the diffraction peaks, incorporating both statistical and background-subtraction uncertainties). Raw intensity profiles at representative fields are now shown in a new supplementary figure. We have also added an explicit paragraph discussing pulsed-environment systematics (field inhomogeneity, timing jitter, and intensity fluctuations) and demonstrate that their combined contribution is at least a factor of three smaller than the observed field-induced changes, thereby reinforcing the incompatibility with conventional phase-competition models. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Section on conventional hard x-ray and magnetostriction measurements: no quantitative comparison of field scales, slopes, or error budgets is given between the pulsed FEL data and the conventional data. Without this, the assertion that the magnetoelastic response is weaker and merely an epiphenomenon remains unanchored.

    Authors: We have inserted a new paragraph and accompanying table that directly compares the two datasets. The table lists the onset field, linear slope (normalized to the zero-field value), and estimated total uncertainty budget for both the FEL charge-order amplitude and the conventional magnetostriction/monoclinic distortion. The comparison shows that the magnetoelastic response is weaker by a factor of ~4 and saturates at lower fields (~25 T) than the charge-order enhancement, supporting the interpretation that the lattice distortion is a secondary consequence rather than the driver of the observed stripe-order increase. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational study

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct experimental measurements of charge-order amplitude and correlation length under pulsed magnetic fields using synchronized FEL x-rays, supplemented by conventional diffraction and magnetostriction data. No equations, fitted parameters, or model derivations are presented that reduce to their own inputs by construction. The central inference of direct field-spin-stripe coupling is drawn from the observed linear field dependence (persisting above vortex melting) combined with independent prior observations of spin freezing; this is empirical interpretation rather than a self-referential chain. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatzes, or renamings of known results appear in the derivation. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as an observational report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the x-ray diffraction signal under pulsed high fields accurately reflects intrinsic stripe order without significant systematic artifacts from the experimental setup.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard x-ray diffraction analysis applies without modification under synchronized pulsed high-magnetic-field conditions
    Invoked when interpreting the linear increase in charge order amplitude and correlation length from the FEL data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5966 in / 1302 out tokens · 27030 ms · 2026-06-27T20:29:50.298194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

293 extracted references · 259 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Physical Review B , author =

    O 17. Physical Review B , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.014537 , language =

  2. [2]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Emergence of charge order from the vortex state of a high-temperature superconductor , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/ncomms3113 , abstract =

  3. [3]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Normal state specific heat in the cuprate superconductors. Physical Review B , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214506 , language =

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , author =

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 , number =

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the 33rd

    Paszke, Adam and Gross, Sam and Massa, Francisco and Lerer, Adam and Bradbury, James and Chanan, Gregory and Killeen, Trevor and Lin, Zeming and Gimelshein, Natalia and Antiga, Luca and Desmaison, Alban and Köpf, Andreas and Yang, Edward and DeVito, Zach and Raison, Martin and Tejani, Alykhan and Chilamkurthy, Sasank and Steiner, Benoit and Fang, Lu and B...

  6. [6]

    MarketsandMarkets , note =

    Cryo-electron. MarketsandMarkets , note =

  7. [7]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Existence of electron and hole pockets and partial gap opening in the correlated semimetal. Physical Review B , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.041113 , language =

  8. [8]

    Radiation Measurements , author =

    An introduction to the. Radiation Measurements , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2020.106271 , abstract =

  9. [9]

    and Gerguri, O

    Biało, I. and Gerguri, O. and Martinelli, L. and Küspert, J. and Choi, J. and Garcia-Fernandez, M. and Agrestini, S. and Zhou, K. J. and Weschke, E. and Kurosawa, T. and Momono, N. and Oda, M. and Lin, C. and Wang, Q. and Chang, J. , month = jan, year =. Orbital. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.01643 , abstract =

  10. [10]

    and Kuo, C.-T

    Lee, H. and Kuo, C.-T. and Fujita, M. and Kao, C.-C. and Lee, J.-S. , month = may, year =. Superconductivity. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/g41t-8456 , abstract =

  11. [11]

    Neural Networks , author =

    Deep learning on image denoising:. Neural Networks , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 , language =

  12. [12]

    Communications Biology , author =

    Content aware image restoration improves spatiotemporal resolution in luminescence imaging , volume =. Communications Biology , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04886-z , abstract =

  13. [13]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Democratising deep learning for microscopy with. Nature Communications , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22518-0 , abstract =

  14. [14]

    Electronic Structure , author =

    Line shapes in time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy explored by machine learning , volume =. Electronic Structure , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ae1e4a , abstract =

  15. [15]

    Physical Review Materials , author =

    Denoising scanning tunneling microscopy images of graphene with supervised machine learning , volume =. Physical Review Materials , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.123802 , language =

  16. [16]

    Buchholz, Tim-Oliver and Jordan, Mareike and Pigino, Gaia and Jug, Florian , month = apr, year =. Cryo-. 2019. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759519 , urldate =

  17. [17]

    2026 , keywords =

    Expert Systems with Applications , author =. 2026 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129126 , abstract =

  18. [18]

    Probabilistic denoising for reliable signal extraction in spectroscopy

    Kim, Younsik and Kim, Changyoung , year =. Probabilistic denoising for reliable signal extraction in spectroscopy , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2605.07819 , abstract =

  19. [19]

    IEEE Signal Processing Letters , author =

    On. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1109/LSP.2020.3016837 , urldate =

  20. [20]

    Ultramicroscopy , author =

    Comparison of optimal performance at 300. Ultramicroscopy , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.002 , abstract =

  21. [21]

    Ultramicroscopy , author =

    Sub-pixel electron detection using a convolutional neural network , volume =. Ultramicroscopy , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113091 , abstract =

  22. [22]

    and Šišak Jung, D

    Donath, T. and Šišak Jung, D. and Burian, M. and Radicci, V. and Zambon, P. and Fitch, A. N. and Dejoie, C. and Zhang, B. and Ruat, M. and Hanfland, M. and Kewish, C. M. and Riessen, G. A. van and Naumenko, D. and Amenitsch, H. and Bourenkov, G. and Bricogne, G. and Chari, A. and Schulze-Briese, C. , month = jul, year =. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation ,...

  23. [23]

    and Dudina, Alexandra and Kaspar, Sebastian and Schulze-Briese, Clemens , month = feb, year =

    Zambon, Pietro and Montemurro, Giuseppe Vito and Fernandez-Perez, Sonia and Schnyder, Roger and Lehmann, Niklaus and Sakhelashvili, Tariel and Burkhalter, Stephan and Meffert, Matthias and Jensen, Arne and Würsch, Pascal and Jud, Pascal A. and Dudina, Alexandra and Kaspar, Sebastian and Schulze-Briese, Clemens , month = feb, year =. A gallium arsenide hyb...

  24. [24]

    and Barba Flores, L

    Xie, X. and Barba Flores, L. and Bejar Haro, B. and Bergamaschi, A. and Fröjdh, E. and Müller, E. and Paton, K.A. and Poghosyan, E. and Remlinger, C. , month = jan, year =. Enhancing spatial resolution in. Journal of Instrumentation , publisher =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/01/C01020 , abstract =

  25. [25]

    Journal of Instrumentation , author =

    M. Journal of Instrumentation , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/C05015 , abstract =

  26. [26]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =

    Allpix2:. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.06.020 , abstract =

  27. [27]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =

    An autoencoder for compressing angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy data , volume =. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ada8f2 , abstract =

  28. [29]

    Physical Review X , author =

    Fisher. Physical Review X , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/kn3z-rmm8 , abstract =

  29. [30]

    Journal of Instrumentation , author =

    A. Journal of Instrumentation , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/12/C12018 , abstract =

  30. [31]

    and Kelman, Bradley and Pichon, Thibault and Biancalani, Enrico and Gilbert, James , month = dec, year =

    Arko, Matej and Prod’homme, Thibaut and Lemmel, Frederic and Serra, Benoit and George, Elizabeth M. and Kelman, Bradley and Pichon, Thibault and Biancalani, Enrico and Gilbert, James , month = dec, year =. Pyxel 1.0: an open source. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , publisher =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.4.048002 , abstract =

  31. [32]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A506(3), 250–303 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    Geant4—a simulation toolkit , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 2003 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 , abstract =

  32. [33]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Superconductivity suppression and bilayer decoupling in. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536919123 , abstract =

  33. [34]

    2009 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/970 , number =

  34. [35]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Orbital magnetic moments in. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/hdzg-mn6r , language =

  35. [36]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Investigating the interstellar dust through the. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731664 , abstract =

  36. [37]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =

    Laue diffraction from biological samples , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(86)90164-6 , abstract =

  37. [38]

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology , author =

    Radiation damage to biological macromolecules∗ , volume =. Current Opinion in Structural Biology , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102662 , abstract =

  38. [39]

    Native structure of photosystem

    Suga, Michihiro and Akita, Fusamichi and Hirata, Kunio and Ueno, Go and Murakami, Hironori and Nakajima, Yoshiki and Shimizu, Tetsuya and Yamashita, Keitaro and Yamamoto, Masaki and Ago, Hideo and Shen, Jian-Ren , month = jan, year =. Native structure of photosystem. Nature , publisher =. doi:10.1038/nature13991 , abstract =

  39. [40]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , author =

    Quantitative. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01749 , abstract =

  40. [41]

    Garman, E. F. and Weik, M. , month = sep, year =. Radiation damage to biological samples: still a pertinent issue , volume =. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , publisher =. doi:10.1107/S1600577521008845 , abstract =

  41. [42]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Two-dimensional bilayer ice in coexistence with three-dimensional ice without confinement , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50187-2 , abstract =

  42. [43]

    Water confined between graphene layers: the case for a square ice

    Walet, Niels R. , year =. Water confined between graphene layers: the case for a square ice , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1702.00963 , abstract =

  43. [44]

    Nature , author =

    Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries , volume =. Nature , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature14295 , language =

  44. [45]

    Journal of Alloys and Compounds , author =

    Characteristic. Journal of Alloys and Compounds , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.193 , language =

  45. [46]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Scaling of. Physical Review Letters , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5623 , language =

  46. [47]

    npj Quantum Materials , author =

    Multicomponent fluctuation spectrum at the quantum critical point in. npj Quantum Materials , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41535-019-0191-y , abstract =

  47. [48]

    Nature Physics , author =

    Charge-order-maximized momentum-dependent superconductivity , volume =. Nature Physics , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nphys699 , language =

  48. [49]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Dimerization-. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.086402 , language =

  49. [50]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Charge-. Scientific Reports , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16945-7 , abstract =

  50. [51]

    Science Advances , author =

    Resonant inelastic x-ray incarnation of. Science Advances , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav4020 , abstract =

  51. [52]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.60.209 , language =

  52. [53]

    Nature Physics , author =

    Spatially modulated '. Nature Physics , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nphys178 , language =

  53. [54]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Anomalous. Physical Review B , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L020405 , language =

  54. [55]

    Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , author =

    P21.1 at. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S1600577525002826 , abstract =

  55. [56]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =

    Lattice. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.88.014602 , language =

  56. [57]

    Physical Review Materials , author =

    Insensitivity of the striped charge orders in. Physical Review Materials , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.074002 , language =

  57. [58]

    Nanotechnol.10 765–769 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.143

    Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer. Nature Nanotechnology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.143 , language =

  58. [59]

    Communications Materials , author =

    Charge density waves and the effects of uniaxial strain on the electronic structure of. Communications Materials , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s43246-024-00661-7 , language =

  59. [60]

    Nature , author =

    Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet , volume =. Nature , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05034-z , language =

  60. [61]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29131-9 , abstract =

  61. [62]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Correlation between complex spin textures and the magnetocaloric and. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.165136 , language =

  62. [63]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Spin order and fluctuations in the. Physical Review B , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.014423 , language =

  63. [64]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =

    Transport and. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.84.124711 , language =

  64. [65]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Electron-phonon coupling in. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.195150 , language =

  65. [66]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Phonon softening and atomic modulations in. Physical Review B , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.045102 , abstract =

  66. [67]

    Communications Physics , author =

    Origin of charge density wave in topological semimetals. Communications Physics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01600-1 , abstract =

  67. [68]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Band structure and charge ordering of. Physical Review B , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.125150 , language =

  68. [69]

    Nature , author =

    Formation of isomorphic. Nature , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1038/416155a , language =

  69. [70]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Large-gap insulating dimer ground state in monolayer. Nature Communications , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28542-y , abstract =

  70. [71]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Charge ordering in. Physical Review B , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.075114 , language =

  71. [72]

    2023 , pages =

    Physical Review Research , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013167 , language =

  72. [73]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Classification of charge density waves based on their nature , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1424791112 , abstract =

  73. [74]

    Advances in Physics , author =

    Electronic crystals: an experimental overview , volume =. Advances in Physics , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1080/00018732.2012.719674 , language =

  74. [75]

    Physical Review Research , author =

    Noncentrosymmetric, transverse structural modulation in. Physical Review Research , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023277 , abstract =

  75. [76]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Broken inversion symmetry in the charge density wave phase in. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/kl2z-brms , abstract =

  76. [77]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Origin of multiple skyrmion phases in. Nature Communications , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71020-y , language =

  77. [78]

    and Hüvonen, D

    Yankova, T. and Hüvonen, D. and Mühlbauer, S. and Schmidiger, D. and Wulf, E. and Zhao, S. and Zheludev, A. and Hong, T. and Garlea, V.O. and Custelcean, R. and Ehlers, G. , month = jul, year =. Crystals for neutron scattering studies of quantum magnetism , volume =. Philosophical Magazine , publisher =. doi:10.1080/14786435.2012.669072 , abstract =

  78. [79]

    Candidate quantum spin ice in the pyrochlore \ \

    Sibille, Romain and Lhotel, Elsa and Hatnean, Monica Ciomaga and Balakrishnan, Geetha and Fåk, Björn and Gauthier, Nicolas and Fennell, Tom and Kenzelmann, Michel , month = jul, year =. Candidate quantum spin ice in the pyrochlore \ \. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.024436 , abstract =

  79. [80]

    Journal of Applied Crystallography , author =

    Alignment facility and software for single-crystal time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy , volume =. Journal of Applied Crystallography , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S1600576721004234 , abstract =

  80. [81]

    and Fobes, D

    Weber, T. and Fobes, D. M. and Waizner, J. and Steffens, P. and Tucker, G. S. and Böhm, M. and Beddrich, L. and Franz, C. and Gabold, H. and Bewley, R. and Voneshen, D. and Skoulatos, M. and Georgii, R. and Ehlers, G. and Bauer, A. and Pfleiderer, C. and Böni, P. and Janoschek, M. and Garst, M. , month = mar, year =. Topological magnon band structure of e...

Showing first 80 references.