pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08961 · v1 · pith:Q5VRPNHBnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Rapid intermediate-mass black hole formation via runaway mergers of black holes

Yining Sun , Long Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords intermediate-mass black holesrunaway mergersgravitational wave binariesN-body simulationsdense star clustersnuclear star clustersblack hole spinsearly galaxy black holes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dense black hole clusters form 1000-solar-mass objects via runaway gravitational-wave mergers in under 10 million years.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses N-body simulations to establish that stellar-mass black hole clusters reaching densities of at least 5 billion solar masses per cubic parsec can assemble an intermediate-mass black hole of about 1000 solar masses through a rapid chain of binary mergers. This process completes within 10 million years after the black hole subsystem forms and relies on repeated exchanges that harden binaries until gravitational-wave emission drives mergers. The approach avoids the large uncertainties tied to very massive star formation and evolution. Formed systems match the densities of observed nuclear star clusters, and the resulting intermediate-mass black holes retain low spin from the sequence of mergers.

Core claim

Using N-body simulations, the authors demonstrate that in dense stellar-mass black hole clusters with densities greater than or equal to 5 times 10 to the 9 solar masses per cubic parsec, a chain of exchanged soft binary black holes undergoes accumulated hardening leading to runaway gravitational-wave mergers that produce an intermediate-mass black hole of approximately 1000 solar masses within 10 million years.

What carries the argument

The runaway chain of gravitational-wave binary black hole mergers driven by exchange of soft binaries with accumulated hardening, which proves more efficient than three-body scattering.

Load-bearing premise

Black hole subsystems must reach and sustain densities of at least 5 times 10 to the 9 solar masses per cubic parsec long enough for the exchange-hardening-merger chain to operate before cluster expansion quenches it.

What would settle it

An N-body simulation initialized at the required densities but including realistic expansion from the start that produces no intermediate-mass black hole would settle the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08961 by Long Wang, Yining Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The maximum BH mass (m•,max) as a function of time (t). Model initial conditions are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Semi-major axis (a) of BBHs as a function of time t for the M50k-IMF-All-r0.01 model. The left panel adopts a sampling interval of 2 × 10−7 Myr, revealing the detailed early evolution of the system between 0.05 and 0.07 Myr. The lines with points denote the various transient BBHs that appear throughout the evolutionary history of a particular hard BBH that merges at 0.06874 Myr. ahs,glob and ahs,loc denote… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The relationship between the semi-major axis a and evolution timescales for BBH mergers in the M50k-IMF-All-r0.01 model. tGW represents by dots, denotes the GW merger timescale, while tc shown as crosses, denotes the collisional (close-en￾counter) timescale. In the early phase (0.5 Myr ≤ t ≲ 0.7 Myr; left panel), many globally soft BBHs form rapidly but are quickly disrupted. Rarely, a globally hard BBH fo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The relationships between post-merger BH mass mf• and GW kick velocity vk (left), spin χ (middle) and between χ and vk (right) are shown for the M50k-IMF-All-r0.01 and M50k-SM-All-r0.01 models. 3.4.2. BBH Orbital Parameters The panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relation between post-merger BH mass (mf•) and component mass ratio (q) of pre-merger BBHs for the M50k-IMF-ALL-r0.01 model. Colors represent the smaller BH mass m•,min in BBHs. to the insufficient number of relevant events they produced. Two samples are considered: events matching the mass range only, and those matching both mass and spin ranges. ΓI and Γn generally increase with density regardless of spi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The half-mass radius rh• (blue), core radius rc• (red), average mass m• of stellar-mass BHs (≤ 150 M⊙) within these radii, the stellar-mass density at 0.1 pc ρ0.1 ⋆, the half-mass radius velocity σh (blue) and the core radius velocity dispersion σc (red) are shown as a function of time t for the M50k-IMF-All-r0.01 model. Models that form an IMBH (≥ 1000 M⊙) are shown with solid lines; those without an IMBH… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Density profiles as a function of radius for M50k-IMF-BH and M50k-IMF-ALL under different initial conditions with half-mass radii rh• = 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 pc. Different colors represent different initial half-mass radii. Solid lines denote the total density profile of BHs and stellars combined for M50k-IMF-ALL, dashed lines denote the BH density profiles of M50k-IMF-ALL. in KozaiLidov triple systems; how… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations indicate that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in high-redshift galaxies formed on timescales far shorter than classical growth models allow. One hypothesis suggests intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) seeds as an efficient growth channel. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that in dense stellar-mass black hole (BH) clusters ($\ge 5\times10^9 M_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^3$), runaway gravitational-wave binary BH (BBH) mergers can produce a $\sim 10^3 M_\odot$ IMBH within 10 Myr from the formation of the BH subsystem. This scenario is simple and avoids large uncertainties regarding stellar mergers and evolution in the IMBH formation via very massive stars channel. We find that the runaway GW-merger mechanism relies on hard BBH formation through a chain of exchanged soft BBHs with accumulated hardening, which is far more efficient than three-body scattering. We analyze how IMBH formation depends on cluster density, total mass, initial mass function, and stellar halo potential. We find that due to cluster expansion, the systems forming IMBHs have densities consistent with present-day nuclear star clusters, such as those in the Milky Way and M33. Furthermore, we show that IMBH spin remains low due to repeated mergers, and we estimate the rate of GW190521 and GW231123-like events within the first 100 Myr to be $2.27-247.52$ and $3.23-63.63 $ per Gyr per cluster.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper uses N-body simulations to demonstrate that in dense stellar-mass black hole clusters with initial densities ≥5×10^9 M⊙/pc³, a chain of exchanged and hardened BBH mergers via gravitational waves can produce a ∼10³ M⊙ IMBH within 10 Myr from BH-subsystem formation. It examines dependence on density, total mass, IMF, and halo potential; reports consistency with nuclear star cluster densities; notes low IMBH spin from repeated mergers; and estimates rates for GW190521- and GW231123-like events.

Significance. If the extreme initial densities prove attainable, the work supplies a relatively simple IMBH-seed channel that avoids stellar-merger uncertainties and yields falsifiable predictions for early GW-event rates and IMBH spins. The reported consistency between simulated densities and observed nuclear clusters is a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and initial conditions] Abstract and initial-conditions section: the central claim requires that BH subsystems can reach and sustain densities ≥5×10^9 M⊙/pc³ long enough for the exchange-hardening-merger sequence to complete within 10 Myr, yet the simulations initialize at this density threshold rather than deriving it from the prior evolution of a realistic parent cluster that includes stellar evolution, mass segregation, and gas expulsion.
  2. [Numerical methods] Numerical-methods description (presumably § on simulation setup): the manuscript supplies no information on the N-body integrator, softening prescription, post-Newtonian terms, or validation against known three-body or GW-merger benchmarks; without these the reliability of the reported runaway-merger chain cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Rate estimates] The quoted rate ranges (2.27–247.52 and 3.23–63.63 per Gyr per cluster) are broad; a brief statement of the parameter variations that produce the bounds would aid interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and initial-conditions section: the central claim requires that BH subsystems can reach and sustain densities ≥5×10^9 M⊙/pc³ long enough for the exchange-hardening-merger sequence to complete within 10 Myr, yet the simulations initialize at this density threshold rather than deriving it from the prior evolution of a realistic parent cluster that includes stellar evolution, mass segregation, and gas expulsion.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the simulations are initialized with the BH subsystem already at the stated density rather than evolved from a full parent cluster that includes gas expulsion, stellar evolution, and mass segregation. The scope of the present work is the subsequent dynamical evolution of the BH subsystem once formed, as the preceding phases involve substantial additional uncertainties not addressed here. We will add an expanded discussion in the introduction and a dedicated paragraph in the conclusions that cites existing literature on mass segregation and core collapse leading to dense BH subsystems, while explicitly stating the assumption that such densities can be reached. No new simulations of the parent cluster will be performed. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Numerical-methods description (presumably § on simulation setup): the manuscript supplies no information on the N-body integrator, softening prescription, post-Newtonian terms, or validation against known three-body or GW-merger benchmarks; without these the reliability of the reported runaway-merger chain cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical-methods section lacks the required technical details. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated methods subsection specifying the N-body integrator, the softening prescription, the post-Newtonian terms included, and the validation tests performed against three-body scattering and known GW-merger benchmarks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct N-body outcomes from stated initial conditions.

full rationale

The paper reports N-body simulation results showing that, given initial BH subsystem densities ≥5×10^9 M⊙/pc³, runaway GW mergers can form ~10³ M⊙ IMBHs in ≤10 Myr. This is a forward integration of explicitly supplied initial conditions (density, mass, IMF, halo potential) rather than any re-expression of fitted outputs, self-defined quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The density threshold is presented as a prerequisite, not derived within the paper, and no equations or claims reduce the reported formation times or rates to tautological inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result depends on standard N-body assumptions plus chosen initial conditions for density and mass function; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • minimum initial density threshold = 5e9 M⊙ pc^{-3}
    The value 5×10^9 M⊙/pc³ is the cutoff below which the runaway process does not complete in 10 Myr; it is an input parameter to the simulation suite.
  • initial mass function parameters
    The paper states that IMBH formation depends on the IMF; specific slopes or cutoffs are simulation inputs.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Newtonian gravity plus post-Newtonian corrections for gravitational-wave emission accurately capture the binary hardening and merger dynamics
    Invoked implicitly by any N-body code that includes GW-driven inspiral.
  • domain assumption Black-hole subsystems can form with the required initial densities before significant expansion occurs
    Stated as the regime in which the mechanism operates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5800 in / 1597 out tokens · 36268 ms · 2026-06-27T16:26:09.375212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2026, JCAP, 2026, 081, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081

    Abac, A., Abramo, R., Albanesi, S., et al. 2026, JCAP, 2026, 081, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081 2026

  2. [2]

    G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 993, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c 2025

  3. [3]

    GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙.Phys

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020a, PhRvL, 125, 101102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102

  4. [4]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020b, ApJL, 900, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba493

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba493 2041

  5. [5]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141452 Abdurro’uf, Coe, D., Resseguier, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.08054, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.08054

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141452 2022

  6. [6]

    D., Vanzella, E., et al

    Adamo, A., Bradley, L. D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, Nature, 632, 513, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07703-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07703-7 2024

  7. [7]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al. 2025, ApJL, 980, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adab76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adab76 2025

  8. [8]

    2014, Science, 345, 1330, doi: 10.1126/science.1251053

    Alexander, T., & Natarajan, P. 2014, Science, 345, 1330, doi: 10.1126/science.1251053

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1251053 2014

  9. [9]

    A., Wise, J

    Alvarez, M. A., Wise, J. H., & Abel, T. 2009, ApJL, 701, L133, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/L133

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/2/l133 2009

  10. [10]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 50085021, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1149

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., & Gualandris, A. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 50085021, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1149

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1149 2019

  11. [11]

    Antonini, F., & Rasio, F. A. 2016, ApJ, 831, 187, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/187 2016

  12. [12]

    Spin-induced orbital precession and its modulation of the gravitational waveforms from merging binaries.Phys

    Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J., & Thorne, K. S. 1994, Physical Review D, 49, 6274, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6274

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6274 1994

  13. [13]

    C., & Ali, S

    Askar, A., Vergara, M. C., & Ali, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.03766, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.03766 19 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Co...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.03766 2025

  14. [14]

    C., Trani, A

    Atallah, D., Weatherford, N. C., Trani, A. A., & Rasio, F. 2024, On Binary Formation from Three Initially Unbound Bodies, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12429 Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 11, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/11 Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 473, doi: 10.1038/nature25180

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/11 2024

  15. [15]

    L., et al

    Banerjee, S., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935332

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935332 2020

  16. [16]

    1986, Nature, 324, 446, doi: 10.1038/324446a0

    Barnes, J., & Hut, P. 1986, Nature, 324, 446, doi: 10.1038/324446a0

    work page doi:10.1038/324446a0 1986

  17. [17]

    Begelman, M. C. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 237, doi: 10.1093/mnras/187.2.237

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/187.2.237 1979

  18. [18]

    Begelman, M. C. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 673, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15916.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15916.x 2010

  19. [19]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x 2008

  20. [20]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Begelman, M. C., Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 289, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x 2006

  21. [21]

    1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton University Press)

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton University Press)

    1987

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Blandford, R. D., & Begelman, M. C. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 68, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07425.x Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07425.x 2004

  23. [23]

    galpy: A Python Library for Galactic Dynamics

    Bovy, J. 2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015

  24. [24]

    G., & Heggie, D

    Breen, P. G., & Heggie, D. C. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt628

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt628 2013

  25. [25]

    2013, Reports on Progress in Physics, 76, 112901, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    Bromm, V. 2013, Reports on Progress in Physics, 76, 112901, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901 2013

  26. [26]

    Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 79, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034 2004

  27. [27]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. 2003, ApJ, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    work page doi:10.1086/377529 2003

  28. [28]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 659, L5L8, doi: 10.1086/516712

    Campanelli, M., Lousto, C., Zlochower, Y., & Merritt, D. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 659, L5L8, doi: 10.1086/516712

    work page doi:10.1086/516712 2007

  29. [29]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Colpi, M., Danzmann, K., Hewitson, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.07571, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.07571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.07571 2024

  30. [30]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa 2018

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Li, Z. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1557

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1557 2023

  32. [32]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07578, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07578

    Dekel, A., Dutta Chowdhury, D., Lapiner, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07578, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07578

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07578 2025

  33. [33]

    2019, ApJL, 870, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe

    Fan, X., Wang, F., Yang, J., et al. 2019, ApJL, 870, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe 2019

  34. [34]

    Fragione, G., Loeb, A., Kocsis, B., & Rasio, F. A. 2022, ApJ, 933, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75d0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75d0 2022

  35. [35]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Freitag, M., Gürkan, M. A., & Rasio, F. A. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 141, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10096.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10096.x 2006

  36. [36]

    S., Wang, L., Tanikawa, A., Hirai, Y., & Saitoh, T

    Fujii, M. S., Wang, L., Tanikawa, A., Hirai, Y., & Saitoh, T. R. 2024, Science, 384, 1488, doi: 10.1126/science.adi4211

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adi4211 2024

  37. [37]

    2023, PhRvD, 108, 024042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024042

    Gerosa, D., Fumagalli, G., Mould, M., et al. 2023, PhRvD, 108, 024042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.024042 2023

  38. [39]

    2016, Physical Review D, 93, doi: 10.1103/physrevd.93.124066

    Gerosa, D., & Kesden, M. 2016, Physical Review D, 93, doi: 10.1103/physrevd.93.124066

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.124066 2016

  39. [40]

    Giersz, M., & Heggie, D. C. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1037, doi: 10.1093/mnras/279.3.1037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/279.3.1037 1996

  40. [41]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2162

    Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., Lützgendorf, N., & Askar, A. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2162

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2162 2015

  41. [42]

    B., & Perets, H

    Ginat, Y. B., & Perets, H. B. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1241

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1241 2024

  42. [43]

    E., Pols, O

    Glebbeek, E., Gaburov, E., de Mink, S. E., Pols, O. R., & Portegies Zwart, S. F. 2009, A&A, 497, 255, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810425

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810425 2009

  43. [44]

    A., Khovritchev, M

    Gontcharov, G. A., Khovritchev, M. Y., Mosenkov, A. V., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 3036, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3300 González, E., Kremer, K., Chatterjee, S., et al. 2021, ApJL, 908, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf5b González, J. A., Sperhake, U., Brügmann, B., Hannam, M., & Husa, S. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 091101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091101 Go...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3300 2023

  44. [45]

    1993, ApJ, 403, 271, doi: 10.1086/172200

    Goodman, J., & Hut, P. 1993, ApJ, 403, 271, doi: 10.1086/172200

    work page doi:10.1086/172200 1993

  45. [46]

    2024 , pages =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f Gültekin, K., Miller, M. C., & Hamilton, D. P. 2004, ApJ, 616, 221, doi: 10.1086/424809 Häberle, M., Neumayer, N., Seth, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 631, 285, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z 20

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  46. [47]

    MNRAS , eprint =

    Haehnelt, M. G., Natarajan, P., & Rees, M. J. 1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 300, 817827, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01951.x Haemmerlé, L., Mayer, L., Klessen, R. S., et al. 2020, SSRv, 216, 48, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00673-y

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01951.x 1998

  47. [48]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  48. [49]

    Heggie, D. C. 1975, MNRAS, 173, 729, doi: 10.1093/mnras/173.3.729

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/173.3.729 1975

  49. [50]

    Hills, J. G. 1975, AJ, 80, 809, doi: 10.1086/111815

    work page doi:10.1086/111815 1975

  50. [51]

    Hills, J. G. 1990, AJ, 99, 979, doi: 10.1086/115388

    work page doi:10.1086/115388 1990

  51. [52]

    2017, National Science Review, 4, 685, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx116

    Hu, W.-R., & Wu, Y.-L. 2017, National Science Review, 4, 685, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx116

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx116 2017

  52. [53]

    A., & Blandford, R

    Hughes, S. A., & Blandford, R. D. 2003, ApJL, 585, L101, doi: 10.1086/375495

    work page doi:10.1086/375495 2003

  53. [54]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  54. [55]

    , keywords =

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000

  55. [56]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  56. [57]

    Inayoshi, K., Haiman, Z., & Ostriker, J. P. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw836

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw836 2016

  57. [58]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 , eprint =

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  58. [59]

    2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

    Iwasawa, M., Namekata, D., Nitadori, K., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz133 2020

  59. [60]

    2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053

    Iwasawa, M., Tanikawa, A., Hosono, N., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw053 2016

  60. [61]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2014, ApJ, 796, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/106

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/2/106 2014

  61. [62]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2019, ApJ, 880, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff 2019

  62. [63]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Johnson, J. L., & Bromm, V. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1557, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11275.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11275.x 2007

  63. [64]

    J., et al

    Kashikawa, N., Ishizaki, Y., Willott, C. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 28, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/28

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/28 2015

  64. [65]

    Kidder, L. E. 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 821, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.821

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.821 1995

  65. [66]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    Kokorev, V., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a 2023

  66. [67]

    2017, Scientific Reports, 7, 41617, doi: 10.1038/srep41617

    Guo, J.-K. 2017, Scientific Reports, 7, 41617, doi: 10.1038/srep41617

    work page doi:10.1038/srep41617 2017

  67. [68]

    Kormendy, J., & McClure, R. D. 1993, AJ, 105, 1793, doi: 10.1086/116555

    work page doi:10.1086/116555 1993

  68. [69]

    , keywords =

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  69. [70]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 5652, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2276

    Kroupa, P., Subr, L., Jerabkova, T., & Wang, L. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 5652, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2276

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2276 2020

  70. [71]

    A., Omukai, K., Habouzit, M., Schleicher, D

    Latif, M. A., Omukai, K., Habouzit, M., Schleicher, D. R. G., & Volonteri, M. 2016, ApJ, 823, 40, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/40

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/40 2016

  71. [72]

    2014, ApJ, 792, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/78

    Spaans, M. 2014, ApJ, 792, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/78

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/78 2014

  72. [73]

    Niemeyer, J. C. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2989, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1786

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1786 2013

  73. [74]

    Lee, H. M. 1987, ApJ, 319, 801, doi: 10.1086/165498

    work page doi:10.1086/165498 1987

  74. [75]

    O., & Zlochower, Y

    Lousto, C. O., & Zlochower, Y. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 044028, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.044028 2008

  75. [76]

    O., & Zlochower, Y

    Lousto, C. O., & Zlochower, Y. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 084027, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.084027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.084027 2013

  76. [77]

    O., Zlochower, Y., Dotti, M., & Volonteri, M

    Lousto, C. O., Zlochower, Y., Dotti, M., & Volonteri, M. 2012, Physical Review D, 85, 084015. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:88504052

    2012

  77. [78]

    2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    Luo, J., Chen, L.-S., Duan, H.-Z., et al. 2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  78. [79]

    2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37, 185013, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aba66a

    Luo, J., Bai, Y.-Z., Cai, L., et al. 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37, 185013, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aba66a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aba66a 2020

  79. [80]

    Spin distribution following minor mergers and the effect of spin on the detection range for low-mass-ratio inspirals

    Mandel, I. 2007, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0707.0711, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0707.0711

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0707.0711 2007

  80. [81]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 3432, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw869

    Mapelli, M. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3432, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw869

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw869 2016

Showing first 80 references.