pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10206 · v1 · pith:5FTLVBPQnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ex· hep-ph· nucl-ex

Charm quark production in heavy-ion collisions as a signature of pre-equilibrium

Maurice Coquet , Thomas Faure , S\"oren Schlichting , Mika Spier , Michael Winn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-exhep-phnucl-ex
keywords charm quarkspre-equilibriumheavy ion collisionsquark gluon plasmadilepton productionheavy quark production
0
0 comments X

The pith

Charm quark production receives a non-negligible contribution from the pre-equilibrium phase in heavy-ion collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assesses charm quark production in the pre-equilibrium stage of heavy-ion collisions by extending methods from dilepton studies. It determines that this early production accounts for a noticeable fraction of the total charm yield, although theoretical uncertainties remain large. This finding indicates that high-precision measurements of total charm production, paired with refined calculations of initial hard scatterings, could reveal details about the pre-equilibrium dynamics. Such information would help interpret charm quarks as probes of deconfinement and diffusion in the resulting medium.

Core claim

Based on previous studies on dilepton production, the (anti)charm quark production from the pre-equilibrium phase is evaluated. A non-negligible contribution to the overall charm quark production is found, albeit with large theoretical uncertainties. Precise total charm production measurements combined with progress on charm production calculations from the initial hard scatterings can be used to infer information on the pre-equilibrium stage.

What carries the argument

Pre-equilibrium charm quark pair production calculated via adaptation of dilepton production methods.

If this is right

  • Precise measurements of total charm yields can be combined with improved initial production calculations to extract pre-equilibrium information.
  • Charm production serves as a potential signature for pre-equilibrium dynamics alongside dilepton observables.
  • The contribution is limited by current theoretical uncertainties in the modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending this to bottom quarks could test if the pre-equilibrium effect scales with quark mass.
  • Unified early-time models might need to account for both light and heavy parton production consistently.
  • Future calculations of pre-equilibrium pair production could reduce the uncertainties.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling framework and approximations validated for dilepton production transfer directly to charm quark production with similar accuracy.

What would settle it

Observation of a total charm cross section that matches hard-scattering predictions without any excess that could be attributed to pre-equilibrium production.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10206 by Maurice Coquet, Michael Winn, Mika Spier, S\"oren Schlichting, Thomas Faure.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scaling functions for the instantaneous charm production rate, (top and bottom left) as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rapidity distribution of the total charm production per unit rapidity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Scaling functions for the integrated charm yield produced during the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Nuclear modification factor for cc¯ production computed at next-to￾leading order with the MadGraph software [37], as a function of the rapidity of the cc¯ pair. The uncertainty band on the initial hard-scattering yield re￾flects the PDF-induced uncertainty in the nuclear modification factor shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of charm production yields from initial hard scattering, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The relative abundances and kinematic distributions of hadrons containing (anti)charm quarks are key observables for deconfinement, heavy-quark diffusion and hadronization in heavy-ion collisions. The production of (anti)charm quarks is commonly associated to the initial hard scatterings in hadronic collisions. Based on previous studies on dilepton production, we evaluate the (anti)charm quark production from the pre-equilibrium phase. A non-negligible contribution to the overall charm quark production is found albeit large theoretical uncertainties are limiting factors. We conclude that precise total charm production measurements combined with progress on charm production calculations from the initial hard scatterings can be used to infer information on the pre-equilibrium stage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that (anti)charm quark production in the pre-equilibrium phase of heavy-ion collisions can be evaluated by adapting results from prior dilepton production studies. It reports a non-negligible contribution to the total charm yield, subject to large theoretical uncertainties, and concludes that precise total charm measurements combined with better initial hard-scattering calculations could constrain the pre-equilibrium stage.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing the modeling transfer, the work would identify a potential new observable linking pre-equilibrium gluon dynamics to heavy-flavor production. The explicit acknowledgment of large uncertainties is a strength, but the result's utility hinges on whether the adaptation from dilepton rates to massive charm production can be made robust.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The evaluation of charm production 'based on previous studies on dilepton production' is the load-bearing step for the non-negligible contribution claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit demonstration that the gluon-fusion matrix elements, charm-mass threshold (~3 GeV), and steeply falling pre-equilibrium gluon spectra yield comparable reliability to the massless q-qbar or virtual-photon channels used for dileptons. This leaves the transferability untested in the region where modeling uncertainties (occupation number, anisotropy, cutoff) are largest.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and for identifying the central methodological step in our work. We address the concern about the adaptation from dilepton studies to charm production below and agree that additional explicit justification is warranted.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The evaluation of charm production 'based on previous studies on dilepton production' is the load-bearing step for the non-negligible contribution claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit demonstration that the gluon-fusion matrix elements, charm-mass threshold (~3 GeV), and steeply falling pre-equilibrium gluon spectra yield comparable reliability to the massless q-qbar or virtual-photon channels used for dileptons. This leaves the transferability untested in the region where modeling uncertainties (occupation number, anisotropy, cutoff) are largest.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit demonstration of the adaptation. The pre-equilibrium gluon spectra and occupation numbers are taken from the same class of studies used for dileptons, but the charm channel employs the standard gluon-fusion matrix element for massive quarks (with threshold ~3 GeV) rather than the massless q-qbar or virtual-photon channels. Because the spectra fall steeply, the mass threshold shifts the dominant contribution to somewhat lower momenta where the modeling uncertainties are still present but can be quantified. In the revised version we will add a short dedicated subsection (or expanded methods paragraph) that (i) states the relevant matrix elements, (ii) shows how the integration limits change with the charm mass, and (iii) illustrates the sensitivity to the cutoff, anisotropy, and occupation-number parameters for the massive case. This will make the transferability transparent without altering the central claim or the already-stated large uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor reliance on prior dilepton studies; central evaluation remains independent of self-referential fitting

full rationale

The paper evaluates charm production by extending methods from prior dilepton work in the pre-equilibrium phase, as stated in the abstract. No equations or steps show a parameter fitted to charm data then renamed as a prediction, nor any self-definition where the output is constructed from the input by algebraic identity. The cited prior studies provide external methodological support rather than a load-bearing chain that forces the result; the claim of non-negligible contribution is presented as an application with acknowledged uncertainties, not a tautological renaming or ansatz smuggling. This qualifies as normal self-citation without circular reduction of the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1070 out tokens · 21134 ms · 2026-06-27T14:25:51.540748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 339–376.arXiv:1802.04801, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852 2018

  2. [2]

    Schlichting, D

    S. Schlichting, D. Teaney, The First fm/c of Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 447–476.arXiv:1908.02113, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023825

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023825 2019

  3. [3]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Venugopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisci- plinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 035003. arXiv:2005.12299,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93. 035003

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93 2021

  4. [4]

    J. D. Bjorken, Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Col- lisions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 140–151.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.140

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 1983

  5. [5]

    J. Y . Ollitrault, Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy-ion collisions, Eur. J. Phys. 29 (2008) 275–302.arXiv: 0708.2433,doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/010 2008

  6. [6]

    Some Features of the Glasma

    T. Lappi, L. McLerran, Some features of the glasma, Nucl. Phys. A 772 (2006) 200–212.arXiv:hep-ph/0602189, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.001 2006

  7. [7]

    Churchill, L

    J. Churchill, L. Yan, S. Jeon, C. Gale, Emission of electromagnetic radiation from the early stages of rel- ativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2) (2021) 024904.arXiv:2008.02902,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.103.024904

    arXiv 2021

  8. [9]

    Pattern Recognition170, 112094 (Feb 2026)

    M. Coquet, X. Du, J. Y . Ollitrault, S. Schlichting, M. Winn, Transverse mass scaling of dilepton radia- tion offa quark-gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys. A 1030 (2023) 122579.arXiv:2112.13876,doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2022.122579. 7

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2023

  9. [10]

    Garcia-Montero, P

    O. Garcia-Montero, P. Plaschke, S. Schlichting, Scal- ing of pre-equilibrium dilepton production in qcd kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 034036. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.034036. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.034036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.034036 2025

  10. [11]

    X.-Y . Wu, L. Du, C. Gale, S. Jeon, Probing the equilibration of the QCD matter created in heavy- ion collisions with dileptons, Phys. Rev. C 110 (5) (2024) 054904.arXiv:2407.04156,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.110.054904

    arXiv 2024

  11. [12]

    Coquet, M

    M. Coquet, M. Winn, X. Du, J. Y . Ollitrault, S. Schlichting, Dilepton Polarization as a Signa- ture of Plasma Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 232301.arXiv:2309.00555,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.232301

    arXiv 2024

  12. [13]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, Statistical hadronization of heavy quarks in ultra- relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 789 (2007) 334–356.arXiv:nucl-th/0611023,doi:10. 1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.02.013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [14]

    R. Rapp, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck, S. Masciocchi, A. Beraudo, E. Bratkovskaya, P. Braun- Munzinger, S. Cao, A. Dainese, et al., Extraction of Heavy-Flavor Transport Coefficients in QCD Matter, Nucl. Phys. A 979 (2018) 21–86.arXiv:1803.03824, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.002 2018

  14. [15]

    Apolinário, Y

    L. Apolinário, Y . J. Lee, M. Winn, Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127 (2022) 103990.arXiv:2203.16352,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp. 2022.103990

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp 2022

  15. [16]

    Andronic, R

    A. Andronic, R. Arnaldi, Quarkonia and De- confined Quark–Gluon Matter in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75 (1) (2025) 351–375.arXiv:2501.08290,doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-101041

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-101041 2025

  16. [17]

    Adamová, G

    D. Adamová, G. Aglieri Rinella, M. Agnello, Z. Ahammed, D. Aleksandrov, A. Alici, A. Alkin, T. Alt, I. Altsybeev, D. Andreou, et al., A next-generation LHC heavy-ion experiment (2019).arXiv:1902.01211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [18]

    URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/2928780

    European Strategy for Particle Physics 2026: Input from the ALICE Collaboration (2025). URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/2928780

    arXiv 2026

  18. [19]

    Aaij, et al., Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL- LHC era (2018).arXiv:1808.08865

    R. Aaij, et al., Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL- LHC era (2018).arXiv:1808.08865

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [20]

    Vagnoni, Heavy ion physics at LHCb Upgrade II (3 2025).arXiv:2503.23093

    V . Vagnoni, Heavy ion physics at LHCb Upgrade II (3 2025).arXiv:2503.23093

    arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    B. W. Zhang, C. M. Ko, W. Liu, Thermal charm pro- duction in a quark-gluon plasma in Pb-Pb collisions at s**(1/2)(NN)=5.5-TeV, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 024901.arXiv:0709.1684,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 77.024901

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 2008

  21. [22]

    Uphoff, O

    J. Uphoff, O. Fochler, Z. Xu, C. Greiner, Heavy quark production at RHIC and LHC within a partonic transport model, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 044906.arXiv:1003. 4200,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044906

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.044906 2010

  22. [23]

    K. Zhou, Z. Chen, C. Greiner, P. Zhuang, Thermal Charm and Charmonium Production in Quark Gluon Plasma, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 434–439.arXiv:1602.01667, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.051 2016

  23. [24]

    T. Song, I. Grishmanovskii, O. Soloveva, E. Bratkovskaya, Thermal production of charm quarks in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110 (2024) 034906.arXiv:2404.00425, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.034906

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.034906 2024

  24. [25]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, L. G. Yaffe, Effective ki- netic theory for high temperature gauge theories, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2003 (01) (2003) 030.doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/01/030. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2003/ 01/030

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/01/030 2003

  25. [26]

    Garcia-Montero, A

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke, S. Schlichting, Pre-equilibrium photons from the early stages of heavy-ion collisions, JHEP 03 (2024) 053.arXiv:2308.09747,doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2024)053

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)053 2024

  26. [27]

    Giacalone, A

    G. Giacalone, A. Mazeliauskas, S. Schlichting, Hydrody- namic attractors, initial state energy and particle produc- tion in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 262301.arXiv:1908.02866,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.262301

    arXiv 2019

  27. [28]

    X. Du, S. Schlichting, Equilibration of the Quark-Gluon Plasma at Finite Net-Baryon Density in QCD Kinetic The- ory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 122301.arXiv:2012. 09068,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.122301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.122301 2021

  28. [29]

    X. Du, S. Schlichting, Equilibration of weakly coupled QCD plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 054011.arXiv: 2012.09079,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.054011 2021

  29. [30]

    Hanus, A

    P. Hanus, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Reygers, Entropy produc- tion in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 100 (6) (2019) 064903.arXiv:1908.02792,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.100.064903

    arXiv 2019

  30. [31]

    Adam, et al., Centrality dependence of the pseudo- rapidity density distribution for charged particles in Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV, Phys

    J. Adam, et al., Centrality dependence of the pseudo- rapidity density distribution for charged particles in Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 567–577.arXiv:1612.08966,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2017.07.017. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [32]

    The p_T Spectrum in Heavy-Flavour Hadroproduction

    M. Cacciari, M. Greco, P. Nason, Thep T spectrum in heavy-flavour hadroproduction, JHEP 05 (1998) 007. arXiv:hep-ph/9803400,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 1998/05/007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 1998

  32. [33]

    B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein, H. Spiesberger, Inclusive Charmed-Meson Production at the CERN LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2082.arXiv:1202.0439,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2082-2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2082-2 2012

  33. [34]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazz- itelli, Bottom-quark production at hadron colliders: fully differential predictions in NNLO QCD, JHEP 03 (2021) 029.arXiv:2010.11906,doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2021)029

    arXiv 2021

  34. [35]

    J. J. Ethier, E. R. Nocera, Parton Distributions in Nucleons and Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 43–76.arXiv:2001.07722,doi:10.1146/ annurev-nucl-011720-042725

    arXiv 2020

  35. [36]

    Klasen, H

    M. Klasen, H. Paukkunen, Nuclear PDFs After the First Decade of LHC Data, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74 (2024) 49–87.arXiv:2311.00450,doi:10.1146/ annurev-nucl-102122-022747

    arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V . Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to- leading order differential cross sections, and their match- ing to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079. arXiv:1405.0301,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  37. [38]

    K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, C. A. Salgado, EPPS21: a global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (5) (2022) 413.arXiv:2112.12462,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10359-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10359-0 2022

  38. [39]

    Acharya, et al., Charm production and fragmenta- tion fractions at midrapidity in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2023) 086.arXiv:2308.04877,doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)086

    S. Acharya, et al., Charm production and fragmenta- tion fractions at midrapidity in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2023) 086.arXiv:2308.04877,doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)086

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)086 2023

  39. [40]

    New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC

    T.-J. Hou, et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quan- tum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) (2021) 014013.arXiv: 1912.10053,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.014013 2021

  40. [41]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, P. Stein- berg, Glauber modeling in high energy nu- clear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205–243.arXiv:nucl-ex/0701025, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020 2007

  41. [42]

    Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders

    C. Loizides, J. Kamin, D. d’Enterria, Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders, Phys. Rev. C 97 (5) (2018) 054910, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 99, 019901 (2019)].arXiv:1710.07098, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054910

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.054910 2018

  42. [43]

    J. Adam, et al., Rapidity and transverse-momentum de- pendence of the inclusive J/ψnuclear modification fac- tor in p-Pb collisions at √sN N =5.02 TeV, JHEP 06 (2015) 055.arXiv:1503.07179,doi:10.1007/ JHEP06(2015)055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [44]

    D-meson production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$ TeV and in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV

    J. Adam, et al.,D-meson production inp-Pb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 94 (5) (2016) 054908.arXiv:1605.07569, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054908

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.054908 2016

  44. [45]

    Aaij, et al., Study of prompt D 0 meson produc- tion inpPb collisions at √sNN =5 TeV, JHEP 10 (2017) 090.arXiv:1707.02750,doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2017)090

    R. Aaij, et al., Study of prompt D 0 meson produc- tion inpPb collisions at √sNN =5 TeV, JHEP 10 (2017) 090.arXiv:1707.02750,doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2017)090. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017