pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10447 · v1 · pith:53ML6ETHnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies in the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 1

Vaidehi S. Paliya , Suvendu Rakshit , Alberto Dominguez , D. J. Saikia , C. S. Stalin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords narrow-line Seyfert 1DESIactive galactic nucleispectral decompositionEddington ratioblack hole massmultiwavelength detectionAGN catalog
0
0 comments X

The pith

DESI spectra identify 18749 new narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies with higher Eddington ratios than SDSS matches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a new catalog of NLSy1 galaxies by decomposing more than 71000 AGN spectra from DESI DR1 at z less than 0.9 that were absent from SDSS. This yields 18749 newly classified objects supplemented by broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. The DESI NLSy1s show slightly higher bolometric luminosities, lower black hole masses, and therefore higher Eddington ratios than redshift- and absolute B-band-magnitude-matched SDSS NLSy1s. They also exhibit lower detection fractions in radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray catalogs. A sympathetic reader cares because the work points to an under-sampled low-luminosity tail of the NLSy1 population whose properties differ from those already known.

Core claim

Spectral decomposition of more than 71000 optical spectra of AGN not included in the SDSS catalog and located at z less than 0.9 identifies 18749 objects as NLSy1 galaxies for the first time. These DESI NLSy1 galaxies tend to have slightly higher bolometric luminosities and lower black hole masses, leading to higher Eddington ratios than those of the SDSS NLSy1 sample matched in redshifts and absolute B-band magnitudes. The fraction of DESI NLSy1 galaxies detected in radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray catalogs is lower than that of SDSS NLSy1 sources.

What carries the argument

Detailed spectral decomposition of optical AGN spectra to measure emission-line widths and classify objects as narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies according to standard line-width criteria.

If this is right

  • The DESI sample extends the known NLSy1 population toward lower luminosities.
  • Higher Eddington ratios imply these objects accrete at rates closer to the Eddington limit relative to their black-hole mass.
  • Lower multiwavelength detection fractions indicate differences in jet activity or orientation compared with the SDSS sample.
  • Deeper multiwavelength follow-up is required to characterize the low-luminosity end of the NLSy1 population.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The property differences may reflect DESI's ability to reach fainter targets or different sky regions than SDSS.
  • Cross-matching this catalog with future wide-field surveys could test whether NLSy1 Eddington ratios evolve with redshift or luminosity.
  • Models of black-hole growth in AGN may need to incorporate a larger contribution from this higher-Eddington, lower-mass population.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral decomposition and line-width criteria applied to DESI spectra correctly classify NLSy1 galaxies without significant contamination from other AGN types or measurement artifacts, and the redshift and magnitude matching is free of selection biases.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution spectroscopy of a substantial random subset of the 18749 candidates that shows a large fraction fail the narrow-line width threshold or are reclassified as other AGN types.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10447 by Alberto Dominguez, C. S. Stalin, D. J. Saikia, Suvendu Rakshit, Vaidehi S. Paliya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This plot shows an example of the spectral decomposition applied to the rest-frame DESI spectrum of an AGN. The model components are labeled, and several emission lines are marked. The vertical shaded regions refer to wavelength regions used for the continuum fitting. The spectral fitting was applied on 71918 DESI AGN using the methodology described above. We visually inspected all the fitted spectra to id… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The histograms of the reduced-χ 2 estimated from the line (χ 2 r,line, red-hatched) and continuum fitting (χ 2 r,conti. , black dashed). m = 22.5 − 2.5 log10(f), (1) where f is the flux in nanomaggy. For 1510 sources, we could not find g- and/or r-band fluxes in the DESI catalogs. We used the PanSTARRS or SDSS g- and r-band magnitude for them. For one source (target id: 2781202851299403) we could not find … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: These plots show the comparison of several parameters measured/derived from the optical spectroscopic analysis of SDSS-NLSy1 (red) and DESI-NLSy1 (black) galaxies. Broad Hβ FWHM: We show the histograms of the FWHM values of the broad Hβ component in panel (c) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The variations of the luminosity of the Hβ and [O III] λ5007 emission lines and 5100A continuum luminosity are ˚ shown in these plots. The color scheme is based on the number density of sources with lighter color representing larger number of sources. The red line refers to the best-fitted correlation. tion rate, compared to SDSS-NLSy1 population (median = −0.40 ± 0.27, on log scale), though the spread is … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: The histogram of the Sersic index taken from the DESR-DR1 redshift catalog. Right: The distributions of the observed X-ray ´ fluxes for NLSy1 galaxies identified in the DESI (black) and SDSS (red) surveys. catalog. On the other hand, 17725 (∼95%) and 12909 (∼69%) NLSy1s were identified in W2 and W3 bands, re￾spectively. This implied a lower W3-band detection com￾pared to ∼80% found for SDSS-NLSy1 sam… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLSy1) galaxies are peculiar active galactic nuclei (AGN) known to exhibit a variety of intriguing observational features from low-frequency radio waves to high-energy $\gamma$~rays. As of now, NLSy1 catalogs are primarily based on optical spectroscopic observations from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Here we report, for the first time, a new catalog of NLSy1 galaxies using the high-quality optical spectroscopic observations made public in the first data release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). We performed a detailed spectral decomposition of more than 71,000 optical spectra of AGN not included in the SDSS catalog and located at $z<0.9$. From this sample, we identify 18749 objects as NLSy1 galaxies for the first time. We also supplement the NLSy1 catalog with a sample of broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. The NLSy1 galaxies identified in the DESI data tend to have slightly higher bolometric luminosities and lower black hole masses (though with large dispersions), leading to the higher Eddington ratios than those of the SDSS-NLSy1 sample matched in redshifts and absolute $B$-band magnitudes. Moreover, the fraction of DESI-NLSy1 galaxies detected in the radio, X-ray, and $\gamma$-ray catalogs was found to be lower than that of SDSS-NLSy1 sources. We conclude that deeper multiwavelength investigations of these enigmatic AGN will help unravel the low-luminosity end of the NLSy1 population. The catalog has been made available at https://www.ucm.es/blazars/seyfert and Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20484681.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a new catalog of 18,749 NLSy1 galaxies by performing spectral decomposition on >71,000 DESI AGN spectra at z<0.9 not in SDSS, supplementing it with broad-line Seyfert 1s. It reports that the DESI NLSy1 sample exhibits higher bolometric luminosities, lower black hole masses, higher Eddington ratios, and lower radio/X-ray/γ-ray detection fractions than a redshift- and M_B-matched SDSS NLSy1 comparison sample, and releases the catalog publicly.

Significance. If the classifications hold, the work substantially enlarges the known NLSy1 population and highlights potential differences at the low-luminosity end, which bears on AGN demographics and multiwavelength selection effects. The public catalog release is a clear asset for follow-up studies.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / methods description] The description of the spectral decomposition (Abstract and methods) provides no details on the fitting code, exact line-width and flux-ratio thresholds, continuum luminosity measurement, error propagation, or S/N handling used to flag the 18,749 NLSy1 objects. These choices are load-bearing for both the catalog size and the reported property offsets.
  2. [Comparison and validation sections] No cross-validation against SDSS-overlap spectra or injection-recovery tests on mock spectra are reported. Systematic offsets of 0.1–0.2 dex in recovered FWHM or L_bol would directly affect the claimed higher Eddington ratios and lower multiwavelength fractions.
  3. [Sample matching and property comparison] The redshift + absolute B-band magnitude matching to the SDSS sample is presented without quantified assessment of residual selection biases between the DESI and SDSS surveys; such biases could contribute to the reported differences in detection fractions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'detailed spectral decomposition' without referencing the specific section or supplementary material that would contain the fitting procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / methods description] The description of the spectral decomposition (Abstract and methods) provides no details on the fitting code, exact line-width and flux-ratio thresholds, continuum luminosity measurement, error propagation, or S/N handling used to flag the 18,749 NLSy1 objects. These choices are load-bearing for both the catalog size and the reported property offsets.

    Authors: We agree that the methods description is insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to specify the fitting code, the exact FWHM threshold for the broad Heta component (<2000 km s^{-1}), the [O III]/Heta flux-ratio criterion, the continuum luminosity measurement (at 5100 Å), the error-propagation procedure, and the minimum S/N cuts applied. These additions will make the selection of the 18,749 objects fully reproducible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Comparison and validation sections] No cross-validation against SDSS-overlap spectra or injection-recovery tests on mock spectra are reported. Systematic offsets of 0.1–0.2 dex in recovered FWHM or L_bol would directly affect the claimed higher Eddington ratios and lower multiwavelength fractions.

    Authors: The absence of these validation tests is a genuine limitation. We will add a cross-validation exercise using the limited DESI–SDSS overlap spectra that exist. Full injection-recovery tests on mock spectra are not feasible within the scope of the current work, but we will quantify the sensitivity of the reported Eddington-ratio and detection-fraction differences to plausible 0.1–0.2 dex systematic offsets and discuss the robustness of the conclusions accordingly. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Sample matching and property comparison] The redshift + absolute B-band magnitude matching to the SDSS sample is presented without quantified assessment of residual selection biases between the DESI and SDSS surveys; such biases could contribute to the reported differences in detection fractions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative evaluation of residual biases is missing. In the revision we will include statistical comparisons (e.g., KS tests on additional observables) between the matched DESI and SDSS samples and an assessment of survey-specific selection functions to determine whether residual biases could affect the reported differences in multiwavelength detection fractions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational catalog from external data

full rationale

The paper performs spectral decomposition on >71k DESI AGN spectra (new data, z<0.9, not in SDSS) using standard line-width and ratio criteria to identify 18,749 NLSy1s, then compares properties to a redshift- and magnitude-matched external SDSS sample. No derivations, fitted predictions, self-citation chains, or ansatzes are present; the central results are direct measurements and empirical differences with no reduction to inputs by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational catalog paper. Classification relies on standard AGN spectral criteria (line FWHM, ratios) treated as domain assumptions rather than derived here. No free parameters are fitted to produce the headline count; the 18,749 figure is the direct output of applying those criteria to new spectra. No new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard optical spectral decomposition can reliably separate narrow-line from broad-line components and apply the conventional NLSy1 definition (FWHM(Hβ) < 2000 km/s plus Fe II strength criteria).
    Invoked implicitly when the authors state they performed spectral decomposition and identified NLSy1s; this is the background assumption shared with all prior SDSS NLSy1 catalogs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5886 in / 1492 out tokens · 16151 ms · 2026-06-27T12:49:48.474341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2009, ApJL, 707, L142

    2009

  2. [2]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 53

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 53

    2022

  3. [3]

    H., & Lott, B

    Ballet, J., Bruel, P., Burnett, T. H., & Lott, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22148

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    2019, AJ, 157, 48

    Berton, M., Congiu, E., Ciroi, S., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 48

    2019

  5. [5]

    N., & Fink, H

    Boller, T., Brandt, W. N., & Fink, H. 1996, A&A, 305, 53

    1996

  6. [6]

    C., Wilkins, D

    Bonson, K., Gallo, L. C., Wilkins, D. R., & Fabian, A. C. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3247

    2018

  7. [7]

    Boroson, T. A. 2002, ApJ, 565, 78

    2002

  8. [8]

    A., & Green, R

    Boroson, T. A., & Green, R. F. 1992, ApJS, 80, 109

    1992

  9. [9]

    2011, MNRAS, 413, 2365

    Calderone, G., Foschini, L., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2365

    2011

  10. [10]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 32

    Chen, S., Kharb, P., Silpa, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 32

    2024

  11. [11]

    2004, A&A, 426, 797

    Collin, S., & Kawaguchi, T. 2004, A&A, 426, 797

    2004

  12. [12]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & Gabel, J. R. 2003, AJ, 126, 1690

    2003

  13. [13]

    2008, MNRAS, 386, L15 DESI Collaboration, Abdul-Karim, M., Adame, A

    Decarli, R., Dotti, M., Fontana, M., & Haardt, F. 2008, MNRAS, 386, L15 DESI Collaboration, Abdul-Karim, M., Adame, A. G., Aguado, D., & collaboration, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14745 D’Onofrio, M., Marziani, P., Chiosi, C., & Negrete, C. A. 2024, Universe, 10, 254

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    2019, ApJ, 886, 42

    Du, P., & Wang, J.-M. 2019, ApJ, 886, 42

    2019

  15. [15]

    N., Evans, J

    Evans, I. N., Evans, J. D., Mart´ınez-Galarza, J. R., et al. 2024, ApJS, 274, 22

    2024

  16. [16]

    A., Page, K

    Evans, P. A., Page, K. L., Beardmore, A. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 174

    2023

  17. [17]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455

    2012

  18. [18]

    C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al

    Fabian, A. C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 4375

    2015

  19. [19]

    C., Zoghbi, A., Ross, R

    Fabian, A. C., Zoghbi, A., Ross, R. R., et al. 2009, Nature, 459, 540

    2009

  20. [20]

    J., Done, C., Jin, C., Landt, H., & Ward, M

    Ferland, G. J., Done, C., Jin, C., Landt, H., & Ward, M. J. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5917

    2020

  21. [21]

    2015, A&A, 575, A13

    Foschini, L., Berton, M., Caccianiga, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A13

    2015

  22. [22]

    J., et al

    Frederick, S., Gezari, S., Graham, M. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 56

    2021

  23. [23]

    2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 176

    Fuhrmann, L., Karamanavis, V ., Komossa, S., et al. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 176

    2016

  24. [24]

    R., Korista, K

    Goad, M. R., Korista, K. T., & Ruff, A. J. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3086

    2012

  25. [25]

    Goodrich, R. W. 1989, ApJ, 342, 224

    1989

  26. [26]

    A., Boyce, M

    Gordon, Y . A., Boyce, M. M., O’Dea, C. P., et al. 2021, ApJS, 255, 30

    2021

  27. [27]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122

    2005

  28. [28]

    M., & Page, K

    Grupe, D., Komossa, S., Leighly, K. M., & Page, K. L. 2010, ApJS, 187, 64

    2010

  29. [29]

    2004, ApJL, 606, L41

    Grupe, D., & Mathur, S. 2004, ApJL, 606, L41

    2004

  30. [30]

    2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, , , ascl:1809.008

    Guo, H., Shen, Y ., & Wang, S. 2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, , , ascl:1809.008

    2018

  31. [31]

    F., & Elvis, M

    Hopkins, P. F., & Elvis, M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 7

    2010

  32. [32]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 816 Ili´c, D., Raki´c, N., & Popovi´c, L

    Murray, N. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 816 Ili´c, D., Raki´c, N., & Popovi´c, L. ˇC. 2023, ApJS, 267, 19

    2016

  33. [33]

    K., & Ammon, K

    Jordi, K., Grebel, E. K., & Ammon, K. 2006, A&A, 460, 339

    2006

  34. [34]

    A., Lohfink, A., et al

    Kara, E., Garc´ıa, J. A., Lohfink, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3489

    2017

  35. [35]

    2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  36. [36]

    2006, AJ, 132, 531

    Komossa, S., V oges, W., Xu, D., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 531

    2006

  37. [37]

    2008, ApJ, 680, 926

    Komossa, S., Xu, D., Zhou, H., Storchi-Bergmann, T., & Binette, L. 2008, ApJ, 680, 926

    2008

  38. [38]

    W., & Wagner, A

    Komossa, S., Xu, D. W., & Wagner, A. Y . 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5115 Koz´ak, B., Frey, S., & Gab´anyi, K. ´E. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 8

    2018

  39. [39]

    K., Paliya, V

    Kshama, S. K., Paliya, V . S., & Stalin, C. S. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2679

    2017

  40. [40]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001

    2020

  41. [41]

    W., & Mykytyn, D

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., & Mykytyn, D. 2016, The Tractor: Probabilistic astronomical source detection and measurement, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1604.008, , , ascl:1604.008

    2016

  42. [42]

    2001, MNRAS, 324, 653

    Lu, Y ., & Yu, Q. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 653

    2001

  43. [43]

    W., et al

    Marziani, P., Dultzin, D., Sulentic, J. W., et al. 2018, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 5, 6

    2018

  44. [44]

    2000, MNRAS, 314, L17

    Mathur, S. 2000, MNRAS, 314, L17

    2000

  45. [45]

    J., & Dunlop, J

    McLure, R. J., & Dunlop, J. S. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1390 Mej´ıa-Restrepo, J. E., Lira, P., Netzer, H., Trakhtenbrot, B., &

    2004

  46. [46]

    Capellupo, D. M. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 63

    2018

  47. [47]

    2024, A&A, 682, A34

    Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34

    2024

  48. [48]

    C., Halpern, J

    Moran, E. C., Halpern, J. P., & Helfand, D. J. 1996, ApJS, 106, 341

    1996

  49. [49]

    A., Kara, E., Cackett, E

    Mundo, S. A., Kara, E., Cackett, E. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 2922

    2020

  50. [50]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 5185 Olgu´ın-Iglesias, A., Le´on-Tavares, J., Kotilainen, J

    Netzer, H. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5185 Olgu´ın-Iglesias, A., Le´on-Tavares, J., Kotilainen, J. K., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3202

    2019

  51. [51]

    E., & Pogge, R

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Pogge, R. W. 1985, ApJ, 297, 166

    1985

  52. [52]

    Paliya, V . S. 2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 39

    2019

  53. [53]

    S., Ajello, M., Rakshit, S., et al

    Paliya, V . S., Ajello, M., Rakshit, S., et al. 2018, ApJL, 853, L2

    2018

  54. [54]

    S., Parker, M

    Paliya, V . S., Parker, M. L., Jiang, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 169

    2019

  55. [55]

    S., Stalin, C

    Paliya, V . S., Stalin, C. S., Dom´ınguez, A., & Saikia, D. J. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7055 NARROW-LINESEYFERT1 GALAXIES INDESI DR1 13

    2024

  56. [56]

    S., Stalin, C

    Paliya, V . S., Stalin, C. S., Kumar, B., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2450

    2013

  57. [57]

    S., Stalin, C

    Paliya, V . S., Stalin, C. S., & Ravikumar, C. D. 2015, AJ, 149, 41

    2015

  58. [58]

    S., P´erez, E., Garc´ıa-Benito, R., et al

    Paliya, V . S., P´erez, E., Garc´ıa-Benito, R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, 133

    2020

  59. [59]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 79

    Panda, S., Marziani, P., & Czerny, B. 2019, ApJ, 882, 79

    2019

  60. [60]

    L., Wilkins, D

    Parker, M. L., Wilkins, D. R., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1723

    2014

  61. [61]

    L., Longinotti, A

    Parker, M. L., Longinotti, A. L., Schartel, N., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 683

    2019

  62. [62]

    2012, A&A, 542, A83

    Ponti, G., Papadakis, I., Bianchi, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A83

    2012

  63. [63]

    S., Gandhi, P., & Hoenig, S

    Rakshit, S., Johnson, A., Stalin, C. S., Gandhi, P., & Hoenig, S. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2362

    2019

  64. [64]

    Rakshit, S., & Stalin, C. S. 2017, ApJ, 842, 96

    2017

  65. [65]

    S., Chand, H., & Zhang, X.-G

    Rakshit, S., Stalin, C. S., Chand, H., & Zhang, X.-G. 2017, ApJS, 229, 39

    2017

  66. [66]

    S., Hota, A., & Konar, C

    Rakshit, S., Stalin, C. S., Hota, A., & Konar, C. 2018, ApJ, 869, 173

    2018

  67. [67]

    2018, ApJ, 865, 5

    Rakshit, S., & Woo, J.-H. 2018, ApJ, 865, 5

    2018

  68. [68]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 153

    Ren, W., Guo, H., Shen, Y ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 153

    2024

  69. [69]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470

    2006

  70. [70]

    N., Hardcastle, M

    Sabater, J., Best, P. N., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A17

    2019

  71. [71]

    2005, ApJ, 635, 260

    Savaglio, S., Glazebrook, K., Le Borgne, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 260

    2005

  72. [72]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525

    1998

  73. [73]

    2013, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 41, 61

    Shen, Y . 2013, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 41, 61

    2013

  74. [74]

    T., Strauss, M

    Shen, Y ., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 45

    2011

  75. [75]

    M., & Osterbrock, D

    Shuder, J. M., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1981, ApJ, 250, 55

    1981

  76. [76]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 1796

    Singh, V ., & Chand, H. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1796

    2018

  77. [77]

    J., & Kumar, R

    Sudan, M., Chand, H., Wiita, P. J., & Kumar, R. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 121

    2025

  78. [78]

    W., Marziani, P., & Dultzin-Hacyan, D

    Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P., & Dultzin-Hacyan, D. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 521

    2000

  79. [79]

    W., Marziani, P., Zamanov, R., et al

    Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P., Zamanov, R., et al. 2002, ApJL, 566, L71

    2002

  80. [80]

    S., Saikia, D

    Umayal, S., Paliya, V . S., Saikia, D. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 125 Vanden Berk, D. E., Shen, J., Yip, C.-W., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 84

    2025

Showing first 80 references.