pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11380 · v1 · pith:CO2VZHCHnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Quasinormal modes and tidal responses of black holes in generic anisotropic matter environments

Yu-Qian Zhao , Paolo Pani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords black holesquasinormal modestidal Love numbersanisotropic mattergeneral relativityperturbative frameworkspherical symmetryEinstein cluster
0
0 comments X

The pith

Black holes in anisotropic matter keep quasinormal modes largely set by redshift while tidal Love numbers show large deviations including sign flips.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a perturbative framework that places a black hole inside a spherically symmetric but possibly anisotropic matter distribution and extends earlier models that assumed zero radial pressure. It introduces an analytic generalization of the Einstein cluster that adds a polytropic radial pressure term and then solves for geodesics, axial perturbations, and tidal responses. The resulting equations show that particle orbits and axial quasinormal frequencies are controlled mainly by a gravitational redshift set by the total mass, with radial pressure only adding modest corrections. Tidal Love numbers respond far more strongly and can reach zero or become negative when anisotropy is large. This separation between observables matters because it indicates which measurements could reveal environmental structure and which would remain insensitive.

Core claim

In a black hole embedded in a generic, possibly anisotropic, matter environment under spherical symmetry, both the geodesic structure and the axial quasinormal-mode spectrum remain predominantly governed by an overall gravitational redshift effect, while the radial pressure systematically enhances the environmental corrections. In contrast, the tidal Love numbers are substantially more sensitive, and can exhibit order-unity deviations, including vanishing and negative strictly static magnetic Love numbers for sufficiently large anisotropy.

What carries the argument

Perturbative framework that generalizes the Einstein cluster solution by adding polytropic radial pressure and yields the full set of linearized equations for geodesics, axial quasinormal modes, and tidal responses.

If this is right

  • Geodesic motion and axial quasinormal frequencies are dominated by the overall redshift factor set by total mass.
  • Radial pressure adds a systematic but secondary enhancement to environmental corrections in orbits and modes.
  • Tidal Love numbers exhibit order-unity shifts and can vanish or become negative for strong anisotropy.
  • The derived linearized equations directly support extensions to ringdown waveforms and extreme-mass-ratio inspirals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tidal measurements could distinguish anisotropic environments more readily than ringdown observations.
  • Negative static Love numbers might alter the expected inspiral phasing for binaries immersed in such matter.
  • The framework could be cross-checked by comparing its predictions against fully numerical evolutions of anisotropic fluid configurations around black holes.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative framework remains valid and accurate for generic anisotropic matter configurations beyond the restricted cases of vanishing radial pressure or small perturbations.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the strictly static magnetic Love number for an anisotropic configuration with large enough anisotropy parameter; if the number stays positive the claim of order-unity deviations and sign changes is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11380 by Paolo Pani, Yu-Qian Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Anisotropy parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Profiles of the effective density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Relative deviations of the axial QNMs with respect to the vacuum Schwarzschild values for the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a perturbative framework for a black hole embedded in a generic, possibly anisotropic, matter environment under spherical symmetry. Our approach extends previous analyses restricted to vanishing radial pressure or to perturbative matter configurations. Within this framework, we derive an analytical generalization of the Einstein cluster that incorporates a polytropic radial pressure, and we investigate the properties of this solution. We show that both the geodesic structure and the axial quasinormal-mode spectrum remain predominantly governed by an overall gravitational redshift effect, while the radial pressure systematically enhances the environmental corrections. In contrast, the tidal Love numbers are substantially more sensitive, and can exhibit order-unity deviations, including vanishing and negative strictly static magnetic Love numbers for sufficiently large anisotropy. We present the full linearized equations, which can be applied to various extensions, including ringdown analysis and extreme-mass-ratio inspirals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a perturbative framework for a black hole embedded in a generic, possibly anisotropic, matter environment under spherical symmetry, extending prior work limited to vanishing radial pressure or small perturbations. It derives an analytical generalization of the Einstein cluster with polytropic radial pressure, then analyzes geodesic structure, axial quasinormal-mode spectrum, and tidal Love numbers. The central claims are that geodesics and axial QNMs remain predominantly governed by an overall gravitational redshift effect (with radial pressure enhancing corrections), while tidal Love numbers are substantially more sensitive and can exhibit order-unity deviations, including vanishing and negative strictly static magnetic Love numbers, for sufficiently large anisotropy. The full linearized equations are presented for future extensions such as ringdown and EMRIs.

Significance. If the results hold within the stated perturbative regime, the work supplies a systematic extension for modeling black-hole responses in anisotropic environments, with the differential sensitivity of Love numbers versus QNMs offering a potentially useful diagnostic for environmental effects in gravitational-wave observations. The provision of the full linearized equations is a concrete strength that facilitates reproducibility and further applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §6] §3 (Perturbative framework) and §6 (Tidal responses): the headline result that tidal Love numbers exhibit order-unity deviations, vanishing, and negative strictly static magnetic values for sufficiently large anisotropy is load-bearing, yet no explicit bound on the anisotropy parameter or estimate of higher-order remainder terms is supplied to confirm that the linearization remains controlled precisely in the regime where these large corrections appear.
  2. [§4 and §5] §4 (Geodesic structure) and §5 (Axial QNMs): while the redshift-dominance claim is less sensitive to the validity issue, the statement that radial pressure 'systematically enhances the environmental corrections' should be accompanied by a quantitative comparison (e.g., relative size of the pressure term versus the redshift term) to substantiate that the enhancement is not an artifact of the truncation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the full linearized equations 'can be applied to various extensions' but does not indicate whether they appear in the main text, an appendix, or a supplemental file.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the anisotropy parameter and the polytropic index should be introduced once with a clear reference to the Einstein-cluster generalization and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of the perturbative regime and the need for quantitative support. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §6] §3 (Perturbative framework) and §6 (Tidal responses): the headline result that tidal Love numbers exhibit order-unity deviations, vanishing, and negative strictly static magnetic values for sufficiently large anisotropy is load-bearing, yet no explicit bound on the anisotropy parameter or estimate of higher-order remainder terms is supplied to confirm that the linearization remains controlled precisely in the regime where these large corrections appear.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit bound on the anisotropy parameter and an estimate of higher-order remainder terms would strengthen the presentation of the tidal Love number results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §3 and §6 that derives a rough validity criterion by comparing the magnitude of the first-order correction to an estimate of the second-order term obtained from the structure of the linearized equations. This will be illustrated with a plot showing the ratio of successive orders as a function of the anisotropy parameter, thereby identifying the range where the reported order-unity deviations remain within the controlled perturbative regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4 and §5] §4 (Geodesic structure) and §5 (Axial QNMs): while the redshift-dominance claim is less sensitive to the validity issue, the statement that radial pressure 'systematically enhances the environmental corrections' should be accompanied by a quantitative comparison (e.g., relative size of the pressure term versus the redshift term) to substantiate that the enhancement is not an artifact of the truncation.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative comparison is desirable. In the revised version we will insert, in both §4 and §5, a short subsection that tabulates the relative contributions of the redshift term and the radial-pressure correction for several representative values of the polytropic index and anisotropy parameter. The table will show that the pressure term consistently increases the magnitude of the correction by a factor of order 1.5–3 across the explored range, thereby confirming that the enhancement is a genuine feature of the first-order solution rather than a truncation artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper develops a perturbative framework for anisotropic matter around black holes, extends prior restricted cases, derives an analytical generalization of the Einstein cluster with polytropic pressure, and computes geodesic, QNM, and tidal Love number properties from the linearized equations. No quoted step reduces a claimed result to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction; the redshift dominance and Love-number sensitivity statements are presented as outputs of the framework rather than tautologies. The analysis remains within standard GR perturbation theory without load-bearing self-referential definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the perturbative expansion and the assumption of spherical symmetry for the matter distribution; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The matter environment obeys spherical symmetry
    Explicitly stated as the setting for the perturbative framework.
  • domain assumption A perturbative treatment suffices for generic anisotropic configurations
    The paper develops and applies a perturbative framework extending previous restricted cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5668 in / 1260 out tokens · 21326 ms · 2026-06-27T12:08:32.887204+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Decomposition of perturbations With the adoption of the RW gauge [39, 57], the per- turbed metric of Eq. (4) can be split into axial (odd- parity) and polar (even-parity) sectors as gaxial(1) µν = ∞X ℓ=2 ℓX m=−ℓ   0 0h ℓm 0 Sℓm θ hℓm 0 Sℓm ϕ ∗0h ℓm 1 Sℓm θ hℓm 1 Sℓm ϕ ∗ ∗0 0 ∗ ∗ ∗0   ,(A1) and gpolar(1) µν = ∞X ℓ=2 ℓX m=−ℓ Y ℓm×   eνH ℓm 0 H ℓ...

  2. [2]

    up” and “down

    Axial sector In this section, we derive the axial perturbation equa- tions from Eqs. (6) and (7); in the following expres- sions we omit the subscript “ℓm”. The components (Eθθ,E θϕ,E ϕϕ), (E rθ,E rϕ), and (E tθ,E tϕ) of the axial sec- tor lead to the following equations, respectively: e−ν ˙h0 −e −λh′ 1 − 1 r2 2M−4π(ρ−p r)r3 h1 = 0,(A26) e−ν ˙h′ 0 − ¨h1 −...

  3. [3]

    The polar-sector componentE θϕ implies H ℓm 2 =H ℓm 0 ,(A45) which was used to simplify the equations

    Polar sector The polar-sector equations are complicated by the cou- pling between metric and fluid perturbations, and we summarize them in theMathematicanotebook [55]. The polar-sector componentE θϕ implies H ℓm 2 =H ℓm 0 ,(A45) which was used to simplify the equations. Moreover, the TOV equations, Eqs. (9)–(11), were also used to simplify the equations. ...

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 12 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Characteriza- tion of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Characteriza- tion of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 115012 (2015), arXiv:1410.7764 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scien- tific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scien- tific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (2026), arXiv:2605.27225 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Abacet al.(ET), The science of the einstein telescope, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2026 (03), 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al.(ET), The science of the einstein telescope, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2026 (03), 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Ex- plorer: Science, Observatories, and Community (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Ex- plorer: Science, Observatories, and Community (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Environmental Ef- fects for Gravitational-wave Astrophysics, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.610, 012044 (2015), arXiv:1404.7140 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Black holes in galaxies: Environmental im- pact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Gravitational Waves from Extreme-Mass- Ratio Systems in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Black Hole Spectroscopy in Environments: Detectability Prospects, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081402 (2025), arXiv:2409.05950 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Chakraborty, G

    S. Chakraborty, G. Comp` ere, and L. Machet, Tidal Love numbers and quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild- Hernquist black hole, Phys. Rev. D112, 024015 (2025), arXiv:2412.14831 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    P. G. S. Fernandes and V. Cardoso, Spinning Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2507.04389 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Babak, H

    S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, ’Kludge’ gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D75, 024005 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 77, 04990 (2008)], arXiv:gr-qc/0607007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Testing spacetime symmetry through gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D102, 064041 (2020), arXiv:2009.00028 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Destounis and K

    K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, Gravitational-wave glitches: Resonant islands and frequency jumps in nonin- tegrable extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D104, 064023 (2021), arXiv:2108.02782 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Zhao and Y

    Y. Zhao and Y. Gong, Dark matter distributions around extreme mass ratio inspirals: effects of radial pressure and relativistic treatment (2026), arXiv:2602.12022 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    P. G. S. Fernandes and V. Cardoso, Dark matter and modified gravity: Einstein clusters from a non-minimally coupled vector field (2025), arXiv:2505.00563 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine,Galactic dynamics(Prince- ton university press, 2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Observational ev- idence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3760 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909386

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  30. [30]

    Berezhiani, G

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, V. De Luca, and J. Khoury, Superfluid dark matter, Phys. Rept.1172, 1 (2026), arXiv:2505.23900 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Vogelsberger, J

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, and A. Loeb, Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423, 3740 (2012), arXiv:1201.5892 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1719 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9906391

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    Sadeghian, F

    L. Sadeghian, F. Ferrer, and C. M. Will, Dark mat- ter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis, Phys. Rev. D88, 063522 (2013), arXiv:1305.2619 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Speeney, A

    N. Speeney, A. Antonelli, V. Baibhav, and E. Berti, Impact of relativistic corrections on the detectability of dark-matter spikes with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D106, 044027 (2022), arXiv:2204.12508 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Mitra, N

    S. Mitra, N. Speeney, S. Chakraborty, and E. Berti, Ex- treme mass ratio inspirals in rotating dark matter spikes, Phys. Rev. D112, 044030 (2025), arXiv:2505.04697 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Y. Zhao, B. Sun, K. Lin, and Z. Cao, Axial gravitational ringing of a spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by dark matter spike, Phys. Rev. D108, 024070 (2023), arXiv:2303.09215 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Datta and A

    S. Datta and A. Maselli, A multi-parameter expan- sion for the evolution of asymmetric binaries in astro- physical environments, SciPost Phys.20, 080 (2026), arXiv:2507.04471 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Dyson, T

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, Environmental Effects in Extreme-Mass- Ratio Inspirals: Perturbations to the Environment in 13 Kerr Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    D’Onofrio, S

    S. D’Onofrio, S. Datta, and A. Maselli, Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments (2026), arXiv:2605.02633 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    J. F. Rodriguez-Ruiz, L. M. Becerra, and F. D. Lora-Clavijo, On the non-radial oscillations of real- istic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes (2026), arXiv:2605.06418 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Chandrasekhar and K

    S. Chandrasekhar and K. S. Thorne,The mathematical theory of black holes, Vol. 69 (Oxford university press, 1998)

    1998

  42. [42]

    Nagar and L

    A. Nagar and L. Rezzolla, Gauge-invariant non-spherical metric perturbations of Schwarzschild black-hole space- times, Class. Quant. Grav.22, R167 (2005), [Erra- tum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 4297 (2006)], arXiv:gr- qc/0502064

    arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys

    Y. Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4289 (1992)

    1992

  44. [44]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Com- pact elastic objects in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044025 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 129903 (2022)], arXiv:2107.12272 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Datta, Black holes immersed in dark matter: Energy condition and sound speed, Phys

    S. Datta, Black holes immersed in dark matter: Energy condition and sound speed, Phys. Rev. D109, 104042 (2024), arXiv:2312.01277 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Chakraborty and P

    S. Chakraborty and P. Pani, Tidal Response of Compact Objects (2026), arXiv:2604.08679 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    M. J. Rodr´ ıguez, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, Love numbers of black holes and compact objects, preprint (2026), arXiv:2604.08653 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Ferrari, L

    V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani,General Relativity and its Applications(CRC Press, 2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Muller, Speeds of propagation in classical and rela- tivistic extended thermodynamics, Living Rev

    I. Muller, Speeds of propagation in classical and rela- tivistic extended thermodynamics, Living Rev. Rel.2, 1 (1999)

    1999

  50. [50]

    Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

    1999

  51. [51]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, On gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  55. [55]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, T. Abdelsalhin, and X. Jim´ enez- Forteza, Magnetic tidal Love numbers clarified, Phys. Rev. D98, 124023 (2018), arXiv:1810.01094 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    R. M. Wald,General relativity(University of Chicago press, 2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    xAct developers, https://xact.es/

  58. [58]

    Zhao, https://github.com/yqzhao1998/anisotropic- fluid

    Y.-Q. Zhao, https://github.com/yqzhao1998/anisotropic- fluid

  59. [59]

    Raposo, P

    G. Raposo, P. Pani, M. Bezares, C. Palenzuela, and V. Cardoso, Anisotropic stars as ultracompact objects in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D99, 104072 (2019), arXiv:1811.07917 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  61. [61]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge- Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    1970

  62. [62]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational wave spectrum of anisotropic neutron stars in Cowl- ing approximation, Phys. Rev. D85, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1203.3963 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Landry and E

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, Gravitomagnetic response of an irrotational body to an applied tidal field, Phys. Rev. D91, 104026 (2015), arXiv:1504.06606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Y. Zhao, B. Sun, Z. Cao, K. Lin, and W.-L. Qian, Influ- ence of dark matter equation of state on the axial gravi- tational ringing of supermassive black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 044031 (2024), arXiv:2308.15371 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D79, 064016 (2009), arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*

    R. Abuteret al., Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*, Astron. Astrophys.618, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834294 (2018), arXiv:1810.12641 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834294 2018

  68. [68]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scat- tering, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    1987

  69. [69]

    R. A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d- dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher or- der WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Ra- poso, Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love num- bers, Phys. Rev. D95, 084014 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 089901 (2017)], arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Cardoso and F

    V. Cardoso and F. Duque, Environmental effects in gravitational-wave physics: Tidal deformability of black holes immersed in matter, Phys. Rev. D101, 064028 (2020), arXiv:1912.07616 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    De Luca and P

    V. De Luca and P. Pani, Tidal deformability of dressed black holes and tests of ultralight bosons in extended mass ranges, JCAP08, 032, arXiv:2106.14428 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  74. [74]

    De Luca, A

    V. De Luca, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Modeling frequency-dependent tidal deformability for environmen- tal black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D107, 044058 (2023), arXiv:2212.03343 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Cannizzaro, V

    E. Cannizzaro, V. De Luca, and P. Pani, Tidal deforma- bility of black holes surrounded by thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D110, 123004 (2024), arXiv:2408.14208 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Speeney, E

    N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Black holes surrounded by generic matter distributions: Polar perturbations and energy flux, Phys. Rev. D109, 084068 (2024), arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Yue, Y.-Q

    R.-H. Yue, Y.-Q. Zhao, and W.-L. Qian, A metric solu- tion for rotating black holes embedded in dark matter 14 halos with central spikes (2026), arXiv:2605.15330 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026