pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12534 · v1 · pith:L3CXLV3Fnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.AT· math.DG· math.MP

Higher Gauge Theory via Differential Nonabelian Cohomology

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.MP
keywords higher gauge theoryflux quantizationdifferential cohomologynonabelian cohomologybrane chargessupergravityM-branestopological quantum order
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology completes Maxwell-type higher gauge fields globally.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method to achieve the global infrared completion of higher gauge fields, as they appear in higher-dimensional supergravity, by imposing electromagnetic flux quantization conditions expressed in differential nonabelian cohomology. This completion is required to make the local field equations consistent with global topological constraints on fluxes and charges. A reader would care because the same construction yields classifications of D-brane and NS-brane charges inside unstable K-theory, of M-brane charges inside unstable Cohomotopy, and a geometric route to engineering topological quantum order on M5-brane probes.

Core claim

The global (infrared) completion of Maxwell-type higher gauge fields is achieved by electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology. This supplies the missing global structure for the higher gauge sectors of higher-dimensional supergravity and its brane probes, and directly produces the charge classifications for D/NS-branes in unstable K-theory, for M-branes in unstable Cohomotopy, and the geometric engineering of topological quantum order on probe M5-branes.

What carries the argument

Electromagnetic flux quantization expressed inside differential nonabelian cohomology, which encodes the global consistency conditions that turn local higher gauge field data into globally well-defined objects.

If this is right

  • D-brane and NS-brane charges are classified by classes in unstable K-theory.
  • M-brane charges are classified by classes in unstable Cohomotopy.
  • Topological quantum order on M5-brane probes arises from the same flux-quantization data.
  • Local higher gauge field equations acquire global consistency from the cohomology condition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quantization prescription may apply to other higher-form gauge theories outside the supergravity setting.
  • It offers a single language that could relate different brane charge classifications across dualities.
  • The construction might be tested by checking whether predicted charge lattices match known spectra in specific compactifications.

Load-bearing premise

Cohesive homotopy theory supplies the background structure needed to define and apply differential nonabelian cohomology to the infrared completion of these gauge fields.

What would settle it

A concrete higher-dimensional supergravity solution whose measured brane charges or flux sectors cannot be reproduced by the cohomology classes predicted by the quantization condition.

read the original abstract

This is a streamlined introduction to the global (infrared) completion of Maxwell-type higher gauge fields (as in the higher gauge sectors of higher dimensional supergravity and its brane probes) by electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology, using cohesive homotopy theory. Applications include D/NS brane charge in (unstable) K-theory, M-brane charge in unstable Cohomotopy and geometric engineering of topological quantum order on probe M5-branes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a streamlined introduction to the global (infrared) completion of Maxwell-type higher gauge fields (as appearing in higher-dimensional supergravity and brane probes) via electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology, constructed within cohesive homotopy theory. Applications listed include D/NS-brane charge in (unstable) K-theory, M-brane charge in unstable Cohomotopy, and geometric engineering of topological quantum order on probe M5-branes.

Significance. If the framework is rigorously applicable, the work supplies a unified homotopy-theoretic language for flux quantization of higher gauge fields, which could organize existing results on brane charges and suggest new constructions for topological phases; the explicit credit to machine-checked or parameter-free aspects is absent here, but the approach builds on prior cohesive homotopy theory.

minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript functions as an outline of an existing framework rather than a self-contained derivation; readers must consult the authors' prior work on cohesive homotopy theory for the underlying definitions and constructions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their summary of the manuscript, which accurately reflects its scope as a streamlined introduction to flux quantization of higher gauge fields in differential nonabelian cohomology. We appreciate the recognition of its potential to supply a unified homotopy-theoretic language for organizing results on brane charges. The recommendation of 'uncertain' is noted, but in the absence of specific major comments we provide no point-by-point revisions below.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; expository introduction to prior framework

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly framed as a streamlined introduction to an existing framework (differential nonabelian cohomology in cohesive homotopy theory) rather than a self-contained derivation whose steps could reduce to inputs by construction. No equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing claims are exhibited in the provided text that would allow identification of self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation reductions. The central statement that flux quantization in this cohomology achieves the global completion is presented as an application of the framework, not as a theorem derived within the paper itself. External mathematical structure from prior work is invoked in the normal manner for an expository article and does not trigger circularity under the stated criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. No free parameters or invented physical entities are identifiable from the given text. The central construction rests on standard axioms of homotopy theory and differential cohomology.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cohesive homotopy theory provides the correct setting in which differential nonabelian cohomology can be defined and used for flux quantization.
    Invoked by the abstract as the ambient framework for the entire construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5600 in / 1216 out tokens · 20961 ms · 2026-06-27T08:54:14.393772+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Higher Geometry in Physics

    [AF25] D. Ayala and J. Francis.A parametrized Pontryagin–Thom theorem. 2025.doi:10.485 50/arXiv.2512.10274. arXiv:2512.10274 [math.AT](cit. on p. 25). [AGP02] M. Aguilar, S. Gitler, and C. Prieto.Algebraic Topology from a Homotopical Viewpoint. Universitext. Springer, 2002.isbn: 9780387224893.doi:10.1007/b97586(cit. on pp. 27, 45, 46). 47 Higher Gauge The...

  2. [2]

    Twisted $K$-theory

    arXiv:2312 . 07308 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 3–5, 23). [Alv85] O. Alvarez. “Topological Quantization and Cohomology”. In:Commun. Math. Phys. 100.2 (June 1985), pp. 279–309.doi:10.1007/bf01212452(cit. on pp. 3, 31, 32). [AS04] M. Atiyah and G. Segal. “Twisted K-theory”. In:Ukrainian Mathematical Bulletin1.3 (2004), pp. 291–330. eprint:math/0407054(math.KT).url:...

  3. [3]

    2007, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments , 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2010.isbn: 978-0-19-923718-0.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/978019856861 2.001.0001(cit. on p. 5). [Bag19] M. Baggioli.Applied Holography – A Practical Mini-Course. SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, 2019.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35184-7(cit. on p. 5). [Ban25] P. Banerjee. “Gauge potentials on the M5 brane in...

  4. [4]

    159–185.doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00217-2

    2025, pp. 159–185.doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00217-2. arXiv: 2401.05275 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 5, 23). [Bor94] F. Borceux.Handbook of Categorical Algebra: Volume 1, Basic Category Theory. Vol

  5. [5]

    Abstract homotopy theory and generalized sheaf cohomology

    Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511525858(cit. on p. 10). [Bro73] K. S. Brown. “Abstract homotopy theory and generalized sheaf cohomology”. In:Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society186 (1973), pp. 419–458.doi:10.2307/1 996573(cit. on p. 5). 48 Higher Gauge Theory...

  6. [6]

    New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1991.isbn: 978-1-4613- 9716-8.doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9714-4(cit

    Mathematical Sciences Re- search Institute Publications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1991.isbn: 978-1-4613- 9716-8.doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9714-4(cit. on p. 21). [Bry93] J.-L. Brylinski.Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization. Vol

  7. [7]

    Higher Gauge Theory

    Progress in Mathematics. Boston, MA: Birkh¨ auser, 1993.isbn: 978-0-8176-3644-9.doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4731-5(cit. on pp. 3, 32). [BS07] J. C. Baez and U. Schreiber. “Higher Gauge Theory”. In:Categories in Algebra, Geom- etry and Mathematical Physics. Vol

  8. [8]

    Higher Gauge Theory

    Contemporary Mathematics. American Math- ematical Society, 2007, pp. 7–30.doi:10.1090/conm/431/08270. arXiv:math/0511710 [math.DG](cit. on pp. 5, 23). [BSS18] M. Benini, A. Schenkel, and U. Schreiber. “The Stack of Yang–Mills Fields on Lorentzian Manifolds”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics359.2 (Mar. 2018), pp. 765– 820.doi:10.1007/s00220-018-31...

  9. [9]

    arXiv: 1806.01115 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 39, 47). [BSS26a] P. Banerjee, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber.Flux Quantization of Type IIA in Unstable K- Theory. to appear next week. 2026.url:https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Flu x+Quantization+of+Type+IIA(cit. on p. 40). [BSS26b] P. Banerjee, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber.Flux Quantization on M-Strings. Mar

  10. [10]

    Symmetries and Higher-Form Connections in Derived Differential Geometry

    arXiv:2603.14440 [hep-th](cit. on p. 42). [Bun+26] S. Bunk et al.Symmetries and Higher-Form Connections in Derived Differential Geom- etry. 2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.03441. arXiv:2602.03441 [math.DG](cit. on pp. 5, 23). [CD25] L. Castellani and R. D’Auria. “TheL ∞-structure of Free Differential Algebras and Su- pergravity”. In:International Journal of ...

  11. [12]

    Heisenberg Groups and Noncommutative Fluxes

    Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2000.doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0105-9(cit. on p. 24). [FMS07a] D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and G. Segal. “Heisenberg Groups and Noncommutative Fluxes”. In:Annals Phys.322 (2007), pp. 236–285.doi:10.1016/j.aop.2006.07.014. arXiv:hep-th/0605200(cit. on p. 32). [FMS07b] D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and G. Segal. “The Uncertai...

  12. [13]

    Dirac Charge Quantization and Generalized Differential Cohomology

    International Press of Boston, 2001, pp. 41–87.doi:10.4310/cdm.2001.v2001.n1.a2. arXiv:math-ph/02 06031(cit. on p. 33). [Fre02] D. S. Freed. “Dirac Charge Quantization and Generalized Differential Cohomology”. In: Surveys in Differential Geometry7.1 (2002), pp. 129–194.doi:10.4310/SDG.2002.v7 .n1.a6. arXiv:hep-th/0011220 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 31–33). [Fri1...

  13. [14]

    T-Duality from super Lie n-algebra cocycles for super p-branes

    arXiv:1606 . 03206 [hep-th](cit. on p. 39). [FSS18] D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber. “T-Duality from super Lien-algebra cocycles for superp-branes”. In:Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.22.5 (2018), pp. 1209–1270.doi:10.4310 /ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a3. arXiv:1611.06536 [hep-th](cit. on p. 47). [FSS19] D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber. “The Rational Higher Str...

  14. [15]

    Twisted Cohomotopy implies Twisted String Structure on M5-branes

    arXiv:1906.07417 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 3, 39, 41). [FSS21b] D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber. “Twisted Cohomotopy implies Twisted String Structure on M5-branes”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics62.4 (2021), p. 042301. doi:10.1063/5.0037786. arXiv:2002.11093 [hep-th](cit. on p. 41). [FSS23] D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber.The Character Map in...

  15. [16]

    I-Brane Inflow and Anomalous Couplings on D-Branes

    NATO ASI Series. New York, NY: Springer, 1988, pp. 101–141.doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0729-7 _5(cit. on pp. 31, 33). [GHM97] M. B. Green, J. A. Harvey, and G. W. Moore. “I-brane inflow and anomalous couplings on D-branes”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.14 (1997), pp. 47–52.doi:10.1088/0264-9381 /14/1/008. arXiv:hep-th/9605033 [hep-th](cit. on p. 33). [GJ09] P. Goerss...

  16. [17]

    Quantum critical superconductors in string theory and M-theory

    Progress in Mathematics. Boston, MA: Birkh¨ auser, 2013.isbn: 978-1-4614-8467-7.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4(cit. on p. 25). [GMS09] G. Giachetta, L. Mangiarotti, and G. Sardanashvily.Advanced Classical Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific, 2009.isbn: 978-981-283-914-5.doi:10.1142/7189(cit. on p. 3). 51 Higher Gauge Theory References [GPR10] S. S. ...

  17. [18]

    Holographic superconductivity in M- Theory

    arXiv:2505.13368 [math-ph].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/250 5.13368(cit. on p. 3). [GSW09] J. P. Gauntlett, J. Sonner, and T. Wiseman. “Holographic superconductivity in M- Theory”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009), p. 151601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.1 51601(cit. on p. 5). [GSW10] J. Gauntlett, J. Sonner, and T. Wiseman. “Quantum Criticality and Holographic S...

  18. [19]

    Rational homotopy theory: a brief introduction

    Contemporary 52 Higher Gauge Theory References Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 175–202.doi: 10.1090/conm/436/08409. arXiv:math/0604626 [math.AT](cit. on p. 24). [HS05] M. J. Hopkins and I. M. Singer. “Quadratic Functions in Geometry, Topology, and M- Theory”. In:Journal of Differential Geometry70.3 (July 2005), pp. 32...

  19. [20]

    The six-dimensional self-dual tensor

    arXiv:hep- th/9611008 [hep-th](cit. on p. 41). [HSW97] P. S. Howe, E. Sezgin, and P. C. West. “The six-dimensional self-dual tensor”. In:Physics Letters B400.3–4 (1997), pp. 255–259.doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00365-1. arXiv: hep-th/9702111 [hep-th](cit. on p. 41). [HT92] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim.Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton, NJ: Prince- to...

  20. [21]

    New York and London: Academic Press, 1959.url:https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/ ˜v1ranick /papers/hu2.pdf(cit

    Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York and London: Academic Press, 1959.url:https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/ ˜v1ranick /papers/hu2.pdf(cit. on p. 39). [Hus+08] D. Husem¨ oller et al.Basic Bundle Theory and K-Cohomology Invariants. Vol

  21. [22]

    Springer, 2008.doi:10

    Lec- ture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2008.doi:10 . 1007 / 978 - 3 - 540 - 74956 - 1(cit. on p. 46). [Igl13] P. Iglesias-Zemmour.Diffeology. Vol

  22. [23]

    In: Mulder, V., Mermoud, A., Lenders, V., Tellenbach, B

    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Prov- idence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2013.isbn: 978-0-8218-9131-5.url: https://bookstore.ams.org/surv-185(cit. on pp. 8, 10). [IM25] A. Ibort and A. Mas. “Smooth sets of fields: A pedagogical introduction”. In:Geometric Mechanics2.3 (Aug. 2025), pp. 251–274.doi:10 . 1142 / s2972458925400052. arXiv: 25...

  23. [24]

    Higher Structures in M-Theory

    Lectures at Advanced Course on Simplicial Methods in Higher Categories, Vol. II. Barcelona: Centre de Recerca Matem` atica, Feb. 2008.url:http://mat.uab.cat/ ˜kock/crm/hocat/adv anced-course/Quadern45-2.pdf(cit. on p. 13). [Jur+19] B. Jurˇ co et al. “Higher Structures in M-Theory”. In:Fortschritte der Physik67.8–9 (2019), p. 1910001.doi:10.1002/prop.20191...

  24. [25]

    Geometric Quantization

    arXiv:2407.11092 [math-ph](cit. on p. 42). [Kir90] A. Kirillov. “Geometric Quantization”. In:Dynamical Systems IV. Vol

  25. [26]

    Springer, 1990, pp

    Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 1990, pp. 137–172.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-0679 3-2_2(cit. on p. 34). [Koc96] S. O. Kochman.Bordism, Stable Homotopy and Adams Spectral Sequences. Vol

  26. [27]

    Synthetic geometry of differential equations: I. Jets and comonad structure

    Fields Institute Monographs. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1996.isbn: 978- 1-4704-3134-1.doi:10.1090/fim/007.url:https://bookstore.ams.org/fim-7(cit. on pp. 27, 46). [KS26] I. Khavkine and U. Schreiber. “Synthetic Geometry of Differential Equations: Jets and Comonad Structure”. In:Journal of Geometry and Physics(2026). to appear. arXiv: 1...

  27. [28]

    T-Duality and Differential K-Theory

    arXiv:2601.03150 [cond-mat.str-el](cit. on p. 42). [KV14] A. Kahle and A. Valentino. “T-Duality and Differential K-Theory”. In:Communications in Contemporary Mathematics16.02 (2014), p. 1350014.doi:10.1142/S021919971350

  28. [29]

    Axiomatic cohesion

    arXiv:0912.2516 [math.KT](cit. on p. 33). [Law07] F. W. Lawvere. “Axiomatic cohesion”. In:Theory and Applications of Categories19.3 (2007), pp. 41–49.url:http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/19/3/19-03abs.html (cit. on pp. 8, 11). [Laz13] A. Lazarev. “Maurer–Cartan moduli and models for function spaces”. In:Advances in Mathematics235 (2013), pp. 296–320.doi:...

  29. [30]

    arXiv: 1109.3715 [math.AT](cit. on p. 25). [Lee12] J. M. Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Second. Vol

  30. [31]

    The duality covariant geometry and DSZ quantization of abelian gauge theory

    Graduate Texts in Math- ematics. New York: Springer, 2012.isbn: 9781441999825.doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9 982-5(cit. on p. 6). [LS22a] C. Lazaroiu and C. S. Shahbazi. “The duality covariant geometry and DSZ quantization of abelian gauge theory”. In:Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics26.7 (2022), pp. 2213–2312.issn: 1095-0753.doi:10.4310/atmp.202...

  31. [32]

    Nonabelian Poincar´ e Duality

    Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 2009.isbn: 978-0691140490.url:https://press.princeton.edu/t itles/8957.html(cit. on pp. 5, 17, 45). [Lur14] J. Lurie. “Nonabelian Poincar´ e Duality”. In: (2014).url:http://www.math.harvard .edu/˜lurie/282ynotes/LectureVIII-Poincare.pdf(cit. on pp. 27, 46). [Lur17] J. Lurie. “Higher Algebra”. Sept...

  32. [33]

    K-theory and Ramond-Ramond charge

    arXiv:1706.09697 [math.DG] (cit. on p. 21). [MM03] I. Moerdijk and J. Mrˇ cun.Introduction to Foliations and Lie Groupoids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.isbn: 9780511615450.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615 450(cit. on p. 4). [MM97] R. Minasian and G. Moore. “K-theory and Ramond-Ramond charge”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics1997.11 (1997), p. 00...

  33. [34]

    Explicit Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connections

    Cambridge Studies in Ad- vanced Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.doi:10.1017/978 1108855891(cit. on p. 5). [RS17] G. Rudolph and M. Schmidt.Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics: Part II. Fibre Bundles, Topology and Gauge Fields. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017.isbn: 978940240959...

  34. [35]

    Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes

    Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathe- matics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2010, pp. 181–236.isbn: 978-0- 8218-4887-6.doi:10.1090/pspum/081/2681765. arXiv:1001.5020 [math.DG](cit. on pp. 3, 5). [Sat11] H. Sati. “Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes II: Twisted String and String c structures”. In:Journal of the Austra...

  35. [36]

    Differential cohomology in a cohesive∞-topos

    arXiv:hep-th/0509163 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 5, 23). [Sch13] U. Schreiber. “Differential cohomology in a cohesive∞-topos”. In: (2013). v2 (2017):htt ps://ncatlab.org/schreiber/files/dcct170811.pdf. arXiv:1310.7930 [math-ph] (cit. on pp. 4, 5, 8, 11, 15, 17, 18). [Sch14] U. Schreiber.Higher field bundles for Gauge fields. Talk given atOperator and geometric a...

  36. [37]

    Foucart, Neutrinos in colliding neutron stars and black holes, Encyclopedia of Particle Physics 10.1016/B978- 0-443-26598-3.00004-3 (2025), arXiv:2410.03646 [astro- ph.HE]

    Sept. 2014.url:https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Higher+Field+Bundles(cit. on p. 3). [Sch16] U. Schreiber.Higher Structures in Mathematics and Physics. Talk at Oberwolfach Work- shop 1651a: Higher Structures in Geometry and Physics. Mathematisches Forschungsin- stitut Oberwolfach, Dec. 2016 (cit. on p. 4). [Sch18] U. Schreiber. “Categories and Toposes – ...

  37. [38]

    Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta

    Academic Press, 2025, pp. 281–324. isbn: 9780323957069.doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00078-1. arXiv:2402.184 73 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 3, 25, 28, 31, 33). [SS25e] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta”. In: (2025). arXiv:2505.22144 [cond-mat.mes-hall](cit. on p. 42). [SS25f] H. Sati and U...

  38. [39]

    Cohomotopy, Framed Links, and Abelian Anyons

    arXiv:2605.10232 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 39, 42). [SS26b] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Cohomotopy, Framed Links, and Abelian Anyons”. In:Pro- ceedings of the Focus Program on Algebraic Topology in Memory of Fred Cohen. Fields Institute Communications. In press. Springer,

  39. [40]

    Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields

    arXiv:2408.11896 [hep-th](cit. on p. 42). [SS26c] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields”. In:SciPost Physics Lecture Notes(2026). arXiv:2512.12431. arXiv:2512.12431 [hep-th] (cit. on p. 35). [SS26d] H. Sati and U. Schreiber.Equivariant Principal∞-Bundles. Cambridge University Press, 2026.isbn: 9781009698559. a...

  40. [41]

    L-infinity algebra connections and applications to String- and Chern-Simons n-transport

    Progress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Basel, 2009, pp. 303–424.isbn: 978- 3-7643-8736-5.doi:10.1007/978- 3- 7643- 8736- 5_17. arXiv:0801.3480 [math.DG] (cit. on p. 43). [SSS12] H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff. “Twisted Differential String and Fivebrane Struc- tures”. In:Commun. Math. Phys.315.1 (2012), pp. 169–213.doi:10.1007/s00220-01 2-1510-3. ar...

  41. [42]

    Homotopical Algebraic Geometry I: Topos theory

    Chap. 4.isbn: 978-3-540- 07860-9.doi:10.1007/3-540-07860-6_4(cit. on p. 34). [Tim23] C. Timm.Theory of Superconductivity. Lecture notes, TU Dresden. 2023.url:https: //ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Timm-Superconductivity.pdf(cit. on p. 32). [To¨ e02] B. To¨ en. “Stacks and Non-abelian cohomology”. In: (2002).url:https://perso.math .univ-toulouse.fr/btoen/files/20...