pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12536 · v1 · pith:EPKCPKQUnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Getting to know the Stellar Clusters in NGC 1569: Bayesian inference of stellar cluster properties in a dwarf starburst galaxy

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords star clustersNGC 1569Bayesian inferencecluster mass functiondwarf starburst galaxyinitial mass functioninterstellar mediumgalactocentric distance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian forward modeling of clusters in NGC 1569 reveals truncation mass varying with galactocentric distance and positive correlations of cluster mass with local metallicity and gas ionization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies Bayesian forward modeling to star clusters in the dwarf starburst galaxy NGC 1569, deriving posterior distributions for mass and age while incorporating stochastic sampling of the initial mass function. It then matches these properties against local interstellar medium conditions obtained from integral-field spectroscopy. The analysis finds that the upper mass limit of the cluster mass function changes with distance from the galaxy center in a manner consistent with interstellar medium density. Cluster mass also increases with both the metallicity and the ionization state of the surrounding gas. These patterns indicate that the formation of massive clusters and the prevalence of high-mass stars within them respond to local galactic conditions.

Core claim

Using forward modeling that incorporates stochastic initial mass function sampling, the authors derive posterior probability distributions for cluster mass and age. They report that the truncation mass of the cluster mass function varies with galactocentric distance, particularly moving off the disk, consistent with a dependence on the density of the interstellar medium. Cluster mass positively correlates with metallicity, suggesting that massive clusters preferentially form in pre-enriched gas, and with the ionization state of the gas, reflecting the increased prevalence of high-mass stars in high-mass clusters.

What carries the argument

Bayesian forward modelling of cluster photometry that accounts for stochastic sampling of the initial mass function

If this is right

  • The truncation mass of the cluster mass function varies with galactocentric distance, consistent with dependence on interstellar medium density.
  • Cluster mass positively correlates with metallicity, indicating massive clusters preferentially form in pre-enriched gas.
  • Cluster mass correlates with the ionization state of the gas, reflecting greater prevalence of high-mass stars in high-mass clusters.
  • Current photometric coverage yields reasonably strong constraints on cluster parameters even without additional ultraviolet or near-infrared data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the correlations hold across galaxies, star formation models must treat local gas density and metallicity as controlling variables for the upper end of the cluster mass function.
  • The same Bayesian approach could be applied to clusters in other nearby starburst systems to test whether the reported relations are universal.
  • Adding longer-wavelength photometry would likely reduce remaining age-mass degeneracies and sharpen the measured correlations.

Load-bearing premise

The forward modelling method properly accounts for uncertainties due to stochastic sampling of the initial mass function and the identified clusters are correctly associated with the local interstellar medium conditions measured by spectroscopy.

What would settle it

Independent measurements showing no change in cluster mass function truncation mass with galactocentric distance, or no correlation between cluster mass and local metallicity, in NGC 1569 would falsify the reported relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12536 by Anna F. McLeod, Bjarki Bj\"orgvinsson, Bronwyn Reichardt Chu, Deanne B. Fisher, Magdalena J. Hamel-Bravo, Mark R. Krumholz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: HST composite image of NGC 1569; red: F658N filter (H𝛼 + [Nii]), green: F606W filter, light blue: F502N filter ([Oiii]) and dark blue: F487N filter (H𝛽). The three rectangles show our three KCWI positions. The KCWI data cover 54′′(∼800 pc) across the major axis and 48′′(∼700 pc) across the minor axis. The inlay in the bottom right shows a 3 colour image constructed from our KCWI data using our three broadb… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Histograms showing the distribution of magnitudes in 3 bands: HST ACS F814W, KCWI 3600, and KCWI H𝛽 using both the 3𝜎 (pink) and 5𝜎 (magenta) detection thresholds. The magnitudes have been corrected for foreground extinction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A schematic comparing the methods of aperture photometry extrac￾tion in the the high spatial resolution HST (upper panel) and lower resolution custom KCWI (lower panel) filters. ters such as age, total mass, and extinction. By matching the model photometry to the observed photometry, we can infer the physical properties of the clusters. Here, we use the SLUG (Stochastically Lighting Up Galaxies) soft￾ware … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: CMD showing the photometry of clusters in NGC 1569 (pink circles) and the LEGUS clusters in UGC 1249 (magenta crosses), and UGC 685 (brown squares). The contours in the background show the density of the simulated cluster library. The vertical axis shows the absolute magnitude in F814W, the horizontal axis shows the colour defined F606W - F814W. The marginal plots are density histogram of each of the… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Corner plot showing results of Bayesian inference for one cluster. Each of the marginal plots has a black solid line showing their median and two dotted pink lines for the 25th and 75th percentiles. From this we see that using the median along with these percentiles is a good representation of the distribution, including much of the two separate peaks in the age distribution, while using the peak value wou… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scatter plot comparing the inferred age of the synthetic cluster population to the ages from the generated catalogue using all available photo￾metric filters (i.e., HST/ACS and KCWI broad- and narrowband). The black dashed line shows the 1:1 line. Magenta triangles show points determined as a median of the distribution, and pink circles show the results when using the peak. We see that although the age is … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Inferred vs true age for the 1000 simulated observations. From left to right, the top row shows: only ACS F606W and F814W, only the KCWI broadbands, KCWI broadbands and narrowbands, ACS along with KCWI broad- and narrowbands. The bottom row shows: ACS with KCWI broadbands, JWST NIRCAM bands, HST UVIS bands, ACS, UVIS and, NIRCAM bands. The the final three are shown in grey to emphasise that we do not have … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Contour plots showing the results of Bayesian inference. The vertical axis shows the inferred mass and horizontal shows inferred age. The marginalised 1D posterior PDFs are shown in the margins. The shaded regions show the two star formation episodes reported in Angeretti et al. (2005), along with a blue dashed line identifying the centre of a peak at young ages. The plot on the left shows the full dataset… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A histogram comparing the cluster masses in the three identified bursts of star formation. The young, intermediate, and old, shown here in pink, magenta, and brown, respectively. Although the lack of low-mass, old clusters is likely due to observational effects, there is a notable difference in the peak of the mass distributions. bins roughly corresponding to the identified star formation episodes: young … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A flattened KCWI image with the locations of clusters marked by points. The outlined points are those clusters that have 𝑄 = 0 0, the others have 𝑄 = 1. The points are coloured by the inferred mass of the clusters in 𝑀⊙. the intermediate and old clusters give 𝑝 = 0.42, and the young and old clusters give 𝑝 = 1.26 × 10−5 . It is important to emphasise that the KS test does not account for observational lim… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The cluster mass plotted over the distance from SSC B. The magenta crosses show the mass inferred using only the ACS/HST photometry, the pink points show the masses inferred by also including the KCWI broad bands. The points with outlines show clusters with 𝑄 = 0, while those without have 𝑄 = 1. The brown dashed line shows a linear fit to the KCWI data with 𝑄 = 1, and the black dotted line is a fit to tho… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A flattened KCWI image with the locations of clusters marked by points. The outlined points are those clusters that have 𝑄 = 0, the others have 𝑄 = 1. The points are coloured by the inferred age of the cluster. While the scatter is large, we qualitatively find that the highest mass clusters tend to be in regions of higher metallicity. Quantifying the correlation with the Pearson correlation coefficient (P… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The cluster age plotted over the distance from SSC B. The points with outlines show clusters with 𝑄 = 0, while those without have 𝑄 = 1. We see no clear trend with age over the distance. 0 200 400 600 800 Projected distance from SSC [pc] 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 log(Age/yr) 200 400 600 800 Along the disk [pc] 100 200 300 400 500 Perpendicular to the disk [pc] Young Int. Old Between [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Cluster ages plotted over distance from SSC B, binned by star formation episode. The pink points show those points in the youngest bin, the magenta crosses those in the intermediate bin and the brown triangles those in the oldest bin. The gray points show those clusters that are not associated with one of the three main star formation episodes identified. The pink dashed line shows a linear fit to the fir… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Left: A map showing the 12+log(O/H) metallicity derived by Hamel-Bravo et al. (2024) overlayed by points showing stellar clusters. The points are coloured by their stellar mass. Right: Scatter plot showing the mass of clusters plotted over their local metallicity. The outlined points show clusters with flag 𝑄 = 0 while those without an outline have flag 𝑄 = 1. Although there is no clear linear trend, we s… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Left: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Left: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a Bayesian analysis of star clusters in the dwarf starburst galaxy NGC 1569 based on high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope imaging combined with integral-field spectroscopy from the Keck Cosmic Web Imager, obtained as part of the DUVET survey. For each cluster identified, we infer posterior probability distributions for mass and age using a forward modelling method that properly accounts for uncertainties due to stochastic sampling of the IMF. We investigate how the inferred properties depend on photometric coverage by repeating the analysis with different filter combinations, including mock extensions to the ultraviolet and near-infrared that emulate the addition of HST UV bands and James Webb Space Telescope imaging. We find that, while inclusion of these wavelength regimes further breaks age and mass degeneracies, the currently available data yields reasonably strong constraints on cluster parameters. We compare inferred cluster properties to the conditions of the local interstellar medium, and find evidence for multiple interesting correlations. The truncation mass of the cluster mass function varies with galactocentric distance, particularly moving off the disk, consistent with a dependence on the density of the interstellar medium. Cluster mass positively correlates with metallicity, suggesting that massive clusters preferentially form in pre-enriched gas, and the ionisation state of the gas, reflecting the increased prevalence of high-mass stars in high-mass clusters. These results demonstrate the power of Bayesian, initial mass function-aware modelling for resolving cluster populations in nearby starburst dwarfs and provide new insight into how cluster formation and feedback respond to local galactic conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Bayesian forward-modeling analysis of stellar clusters in the dwarf starburst galaxy NGC 1569, combining HST photometry with Keck Cosmic Web Imager IFS data from the DUVET survey. For each cluster it derives posterior distributions on mass and age while accounting for stochastic IMF sampling, then reports correlations between the inferred cluster properties and local ISM conditions extracted from the IFS, including a galactocentric-distance dependence of the cluster mass function truncation mass (linked to ISM density) and positive correlations of cluster mass with gas metallicity and ionization state.

Significance. If the forward-model posteriors and spatial associations are robust, the work demonstrates the practical value of IMF-stochasticity-aware Bayesian fitting for resolving cluster populations in nearby starbursts and supplies falsifiable environmental trends that can be tested against simulations of clustered star formation and feedback.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (forward modelling and posterior validation)] The load-bearing step for all reported correlations is the forward-modeling procedure that is asserted to 'properly account for uncertainties due to stochastic sampling of the IMF.' Without explicit recovery tests on mock clusters spanning the observed mass range (particularly below ~10^4 M_⊙) or a description of the likelihood and prior implementation, residual mass biases cannot be ruled out; such biases would directly propagate into the fitted CMF truncation mass and the reported mass-metallicity/ionization slopes.
  2. [Results (cluster-ISM spatial association)] The correlations with local ISM conditions (metallicity, ionization state, density) rest on the assumption that each cluster is correctly paired to the IFS-extracted gas properties. The manuscript does not quantify the impact of spatial-resolution mismatch, projection effects, or aperture choice on the association; any systematic offset would undermine the claimed dependence of truncation mass on galactocentric distance/ISM density.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'inclusion of these wavelength regimes further breaks age and mass degeneracies' but does not report quantitative metrics (e.g., reduction in posterior width or degeneracy parameter) for the different filter combinations tested.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the cluster mass function truncation mass (M_trunc or similar) should be defined explicitly the first time it appears and used consistently in figures and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We have carefully considered the major comments and have revised the manuscript to address the concerns regarding the validation of the forward-modeling procedure and the robustness of the cluster-ISM associations. Our responses to each point are provided below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods (forward modelling and posterior validation)] The load-bearing step for all reported correlations is the forward-modeling procedure that is asserted to 'properly account for uncertainties due to stochastic sampling of the IMF.' Without explicit recovery tests on mock clusters spanning the observed mass range (particularly below ~10^4 M_⊙) or a description of the likelihood and prior implementation, residual mass biases cannot be ruled out; such biases would directly propagate into the fitted CMF truncation mass and the reported mass-metallicity/ionization slopes.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation is essential for the credibility of the results. The original manuscript described the forward-modeling approach at a high level but did not include detailed recovery tests or full specification of the likelihood and priors. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new appendix section that fully specifies the Bayesian model, including the likelihood function (based on comparing observed photometry to stochastic SSP models) and the priors on mass, age, and extinction. We have also conducted recovery tests using 500 mock clusters with input masses from 500 to 10^5 M_⊙, ages 1-100 Myr, generated with stochastic IMF sampling. The tests show that the median posterior masses recover the true values with a bias of less than 0.05 dex and scatter of 0.2 dex across the range, including below 10^4 M_⊙. These results indicate that any residual biases are too small to affect the reported correlations with CMF truncation mass or mass-metallicity slopes. We have updated the methods section to reference this validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (cluster-ISM spatial association)] The correlations with local ISM conditions (metallicity, ionization state, density) rest on the assumption that each cluster is correctly paired to the IFS-extracted gas properties. The manuscript does not quantify the impact of spatial-resolution mismatch, projection effects, or aperture choice on the association; any systematic offset would undermine the claimed dependence of truncation mass on galactocentric distance/ISM density.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the spatial association between clusters and IFS gas properties requires careful consideration of resolution and projection effects. The original analysis used the nearest IFS spaxel to each cluster position for association. To address the referee's concern, we have added a dedicated subsection in the results that quantifies these effects. Specifically, we performed a sensitivity analysis by varying the aperture size from 1 to 3 spaxels and by simulating projection effects using the galaxy's inclination. Additionally, we used the IFS data to estimate local density variations and confirmed that the galactocentric distance trend in truncation mass aligns with independent density maps. The correlations remain significant, with the slope of the mass-metallicity relation changing by less than 10% under different association choices. We have included these tests and a discussion of limitations in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation is data-driven from photometry and IFS measurements

full rationale

The paper performs Bayesian forward modelling of HST photometry to obtain cluster mass and age posteriors, explicitly marginalizing over stochastic IMF sampling, then compares those posteriors to independently measured local ISM properties from Keck IFS data. No step reduces a claimed correlation or truncation mass to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or an ansatz, and the reported trends (CMF truncation vs. galactocentric distance, mass vs. metallicity/ionization) are presented as empirical outcomes of the data rather than reparameterizations of the input model. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against external photometric and spectroscopic observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the Bayesian framework implicitly contains priors on mass and age whose functional form and hyper-parameters are not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5832 in / 1237 out tokens · 18877 ms · 2026-06-27T09:00:50.082636+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Star. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 , abstract =

  2. [3]

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374 , abstract =

  3. [4]

    Observatory, Lowell , year =

  4. [5]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Star cluster formation in the most extreme environments:. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2380 , abstract =

  5. [6]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    The. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac420 , abstract =

  6. [7]

    D., & Aalto, S

    Cool. Astron Astrophys Rev , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9 , abstract =

  7. [8]

    2012 , note =

    ApJ , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/145 , language =

  8. [9]

    Deep Photometry of NGC 1569: Understanding the Closest and Strongest Starburst of the Nearby Universe

  9. [10]

    ApJ , author =

    Dwarf. ApJ , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0134 , abstract =

  10. [11]

    ApJ , author =

    The. ApJ , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd551 , abstract =

  11. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Observing the influence of the youngest super star clusters in. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab643 , abstract =

  12. [13]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    A spatially resolved radio spectral index study of the dwarf irregular galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty028 , abstract =

  13. [15]

    ApJ , author =

    A. ApJ , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1086/592949 , language =

  14. [16]

    AJ , author =

    The. AJ , author =. 2001 , note =. doi:10.1086/319407 , language =

  15. [17]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    The. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2827 , abstract =

  16. [18]

    , keywords =

    DUVET: Resolved direct metallicity measurements in the outflow of starburst galaxy NGC 1569. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae983 , archivePrefix =. 2404.04600 , primaryClass =

  17. [19]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

  18. [20]

    MPDAF: MUSE Python Data Analysis Framework

  19. [21]

    Dynamics of starbursting dwarf galaxies: III

    Lelli, Federico and Verheijen, Marc and Fraternali, Filippo , year=. Dynamics of starbursting dwarf galaxies: III. A H I study of 18 nearby objects , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322657 , journal=

  20. [22]

    The initial mass function : from Salpeter 1955 to 2005

    The Initial Mass Function: From Salpeter 1955 to 2005. The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later , year = 2005, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-3407-7_5 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0409465 , primaryClass =

  21. [23]

    The Initial Mass Function of Stars: Evidence for Uniformity in Variable Systems

    The Initial Mass Function of Stars: Evidence for Uniformity in Variable Systems. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1067524 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0201098 , primaryClass =

  22. [24]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Young. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2010 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834 , abstract =

  23. [25]

    A&A , author =

    Clusters in the inner spiral arms of. A&A , author =. 2003 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021384 , abstract =

  24. [26]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Analyzing star cluster populations with stochastic models: the hubble space telescope/wide field camera 3 sample of clusters in M83 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  25. [27]

    2015, A&A, 582, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425296

    Mass distributions of star clusters for different star formation histories in a galaxy cluster environment , volume =. A&A , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425296 , abstract =

  26. [28]

    Disentangling the independently controllable factors of variation by interacting with the world

    Embedded. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2003 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844 , abstract =

  27. [29]

    Arce and Yancy Shirley and Colton Glasgow , title =

    Shuo Kong and Héctor G. Arce and Yancy Shirley and Colton Glasgow , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abefe7 , url =

  28. [30]

    2024 , eprint=

    The role of turbulence in high-mass star formation: Subsonic and transonic turbulence are ubiquitously found at early stages , author=. 2024 , eprint=

  29. [31]

    and Tan, Jonathan C

    McKee, Christopher F. and Tan, Jonathan C. , year=. The Formation of Massive Stars from Turbulent Cores , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1086/346149 , number=

  30. [32]

    A&A , author =

    Global collapse of molecular clouds as a formation mechanism for the most massive stars , volume =. A&A , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321318 , abstract =

  31. [33]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    JCMT HARP CO 3--2 observations of molecular outflows in W5 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  32. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Outflow-driven turbulence in molecular clouds , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  33. [35]

    D., Roberts, T

    Narayanan, Gopal and Snell, Ronald and Bemis, Ashley , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21579.x , url =

  34. [36]

    , year = 1969, month = jan, volume =

    Numerical calculations of the dynamics of collapsing proto-star. , year = 1969, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/145.3.271 , adsurl =

  35. [37]

    , keywords =

    Detection of Irregular, Submillimeter Opaque Structures in the Orion Molecular Clouds: Protostars within 10,000 yr of Formation?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab659e , archivePrefix =. 2001.04997 , primaryClass =

  36. [38]

    Space Sci Rev , author =

    Physical. Space Sci Rev , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00693-8 , abstract =

  37. [39]

    Krumholz, M. R. and Bate, M. R. and Arce, H. G. and Dale, J. E. and Gutermuth, R. and Klein, R. I. and Li, Z. -Y. and Nakamura, F. and Zhang, Q. , month = jan, year =. Star. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch011 , note =

  38. [40]

    Evolution of Massive Protostars with High Accretion Rates

    Evolution of Massive Protostars with High Accretion Rates. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/823 , archivePrefix =. 0806.4122 , primaryClass =

  39. [41]

    2010, ApJ, 709, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27 , abstract =

  40. [42]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Protostellar. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1086/517515 , abstract =

  41. [43]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 3646, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab278

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab278 , abstract =

  42. [44]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Radiation-. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1086/510664 , abstract =

  43. [45]

    S., de Koter A., Lamers H

    Mass-loss predictions for. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2001 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010127 , abstract =

  44. [46]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    On the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1127 , abstract =

  45. [47]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Formation and. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2307 , abstract =

  46. [48]

    Hydrodynamics , author=

    Feedback from winds and supernovae in massive stellar clusters--I. Hydrodynamics , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  47. [49]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    One-dimensional dynamical models of the Carina nebula bubble , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  48. [50]

    Cosmicflows-2: The Data

    Cosmicflows-2: The Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/86 , archivePrefix =. 1307.7213 , primaryClass =

  49. [51]

    A z = 0 Multiwavelength Galaxy Synthesis. I. A WISE and GALEX Atlas of Local Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925 , archivePrefix =. 1910.13470 , primaryClass =

  50. [52]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1086/316810 , abstract =

  51. [53]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Laura Greggio and Monica Tosi and Mark Clampin and Guido De Marchi and Claus Leitherer and Antonella Nota and Marco Sirianni , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1086/306100 , url =

  52. [54]

    , keywords =

    Star cluster formation and evolution in the dwarf starburst galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07171.x , abstract =

  53. [55]

    G., & Abolmasov, P

    Gemini. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12346.x , abstract =

  54. [56]

    Legacy ExtraGalactic UV Survey with The Hubble Space Telescope. Stellar cluster catalogues and first insights into cluster formation and evolution in NGC 628

    Legacy ExtraGalactic UV Survey with The Hubble Space Telescope: Stellar Cluster Catalogs and First Insights Into Cluster Formation and Evolution in NGC 628. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7132 , archivePrefix =. 1705.01588 , primaryClass =

  55. [57]

    , keywords =

    Fraction of stars in clusters for the LEGUS dwarf galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3748 , archivePrefix =. 2212.07519 , primaryClass =

  56. [58]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Star. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/147 , abstract =

  57. [59]

    D., Roberts, T

    Ionizing feedback from massive stars in massive clusters - II. Disruption of bound clusters by photoionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21205.x , archivePrefix =. 1205.0360 , primaryClass =

  58. [60]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    The impact of pre-supernova feedback and its dependence on environment , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2726 , abstract =

  59. [61]

    Stellar Feedback in Molecular Clouds and its Influence on the Mass Function of Young Star Clusters

    Stellar Feedback in Molecular Clouds and its Influence on the Mass Function of Young Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/710/2/L142 , archivePrefix =. 0910.2238 , primaryClass =

  60. [62]

    and McLeod, Anna F

    Rowland, Lucie E. and McLeod, Anna F. and Fattahi, Azadeh and Belfiore, Francesco and Cresci, Giovanni and Hunt, Leslie and Krumholz, Mark and Kumari, Nimisha and Marasco, Antonino and Venturi, Giacomo , year=. Pre-supernova stellar feedback in nearby starburst dwarf galaxies , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348029 , journal=

  61. [63]

    and Krumholz, Mark R

    Thompson, Todd A. and Krumholz, Mark R. , year=. Sub-Eddington star-forming regions are super-Eddington: momentum-driven outflows from supersonic turbulence , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2331 , number=

  62. [64]

    The Disruption of Giant Molecular Clouds by Radiation Pressure and the Efficiency of Star Formation in Galaxies

    The Disruption of Giant Molecular Clouds by Radiation Pressure & the Efficiency of Star Formation in Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/191 , archivePrefix =. 0906.5358 , primaryClass =

  63. [65]

    Radiation Pressure Limits on the Star Formation Efficiency and Surface Density of Compact Stellar Systems

    Radiation pressure limits on the star formation efficiency and surface density of compact stellar systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2659 , archivePrefix =. 1808.01726 , primaryClass =

  64. [66]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Barnes, A T and Glover, S C O and Kreckel, K and Ostriker, E C and Bigiel, F and Belfiore, F and Bešlić, I and Blanc, G A and Chevance, M and Dale, D A and Egorov, O and Eibensteiner, C and Emsellem, E and Grasha, K and Groves, B A and Klessen, R S and Kruijssen, J M D and Leroy, A K and Longmore, S N and Lopez, L and McElroy, R and Meidt, S E and Murphy,...

  65. [67]

    Lopez and Mark R

    Laura A. Lopez and Mark R. Krumholz and Alberto D. Bolatto and J. Xavier Prochaska and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/91 , url =

  66. [68]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Chevance, Mélanie and Kruijssen, J M Diederik and Krumholz, Mark R and Groves, Brent and Keller, Benjamin W and Hughes, Annie and Glover, Simon C O and Henshaw, Jonathan D and Herrera, Cinthya N and Kim, Jaeyeon and Leroy, Adam K and Pety, Jérôme and Razza, Alessandro and Rosolowsky, Erik and Schinnerer, Eva and Schruba, Andreas and Barnes, Ashley T and B...

  67. [69]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Protostellar. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341 , abstract =

  68. [70]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Lucas, William E and Bonnell, Ian A and Dale, James E , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa451 , url =

  69. [71]

    Probing the chemo-dynamical evolution of disc galaxies

    The. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141727 , journal =

  70. [72]

    The Keck Cosmic Web Imager Integral Field Spectrograph

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad597 , abstract =

  71. [73]

    ACStools: Python tools for Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys data

  72. [74]

    Structure in the Superstar Clusters in NGC 1569

  73. [75]

    Resolving stellar populations with crowded field 3D spectroscopy

    Resolving stellar populations with crowded field 3D spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220476 , archivePrefix =. 1211.0445 , primaryClass =

  74. [76]

    astropy/photutils: 1.13.0 , month = jun, year = 2024, publisher =

    Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sip. astropy/photutils: 1.13.0 , month = jun, year = 2024, publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.12585239 , url =

  75. [77]

    A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A..42L 573, A42

    Luridiana, V. and Morisset, C. and Shaw, R. A. , year=. PyNeb: a new tool for analyzing emission lines: I. Code description and validation of results , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 , journal=

  76. [78]

    , keywords =

    The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/167900 , adsurl =

  77. [79]

    Measuring Reddening with SDSS Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD

    Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , archivePrefix =. 1012.4804 , primaryClass =

  78. [80]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV , year = 2005, editor =

    TOPCAT & STIL: Starlink Table/VOTable Processing Software. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV , year = 2005, editor =

  79. [81]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Effective. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa719e , abstract =

  80. [82]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Radii of young star clusters in nearby galaxies , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2907 , abstract =

Showing first 80 references.