A program to find families of graphs in Free\{C₄,4K₁\} with bounded clique width
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:17 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
If all graphs in a class are (k,l,m)-decomposable then the class has bounded clique width.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The (k,l,m)-decomposition framework ensures bounded clique width for any class where every graph satisfies the decomposition property, and several families within Free{C4, 4K1} admit such decompositions while certain 3-clique-coverable graphs do not bound the clique width of their supergraphs.
What carries the argument
The (k,l,m)-decomposition, a structural property that allows recursive decomposition limiting the number of labels needed for clique width expressions.
If this is right
- Some infinite families in Free{C4, 4K1} have bounded clique width.
- Any (k,l,m)-decomposable class has bounded clique width, regardless of other properties.
- For any 3-clique-coverable G in Free{C4, 4K1}, there exists an infinite family of supergraphs in the class with unbounded clique width.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the entire Free{C4, 4K1} class turns out to be (k,l,m)-decomposable for some parameters, then it would have bounded clique width and thus polynomial-time coloring.
- The program used to search for such families could be adapted to other forbidden subgraph classes to identify bounded clique width cases.
Load-bearing premise
The definition of (k,l,m)-decomposition is crafted so that the bounded clique width follows directly for any class meeting the condition, without needing extra assumptions on the graphs.
What would settle it
A graph class that satisfies the (k,l,m)-decomposition for some fixed k,l,m but contains graphs with arbitrarily large clique width.
Figures
read the original abstract
In this paper we study the class of graphs without cycles of size 4 and independent sets of size 4 as induced subgraphs: $\mathop{Free}\{C_4, 4K_1\}$. This is one of the three minimal minimal open cases for the complexity of the colouring problem when restricted to classes defined by excluding induced subgraphs of order 4. We investigate the clique width of some subclasses of $\mathop{Free}\{C_4, 4K_1\}$. We introduce a new framework: the $(k,l,m)$-decomposition and prove that if all the graphs of a class $\cal G$ are $(k,l,m)$-decomposable, then graphs in $\cal G$ have bounded clique width. We give a few examples of such class, found with the help of a program we designed. We also show, for any graph $G \in \mathop{Free}\{C_4, 4K_1\}$ that is 3 cliques coverable, an infinite family in $\mathop{Free}\{C_4, 4K_1\}$ of supergraphs of $G$ which have unbounded clique width.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the hereditary class Free{C₄, 4K₁} and introduces the (k,l,m)-decomposition framework. It proves that any class G in which every graph is (k,l,m)-decomposable has bounded clique-width. Using a custom program, it identifies concrete families inside Free{C₄, 4K₁} that admit such decompositions (hence bounded cw). It also constructs, for any 3-clique-coverable G in the class, an infinite family of supergraphs still in Free{C₄, 4K₁} that have unbounded clique-width.
Significance. If the central implication holds, the (k,l,m)-decomposition supplies a new, checkable sufficient condition for bounded clique-width that could be applied to other hereditary classes relevant to coloring complexity. The program provides a reproducible method for discovering bounded-cw subclasses, and the supergraph construction gives an explicit obstruction showing that the full class is not bounded-cw. These are concrete, falsifiable contributions to the structural theory of clique-width.
major comments (2)
- [Main theorem and definition of (k,l,m)-decomposition] The central theorem (that (k,l,m)-decomposability implies bounded clique-width) is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. The manuscript must therefore contain an explicit, self-contained definition of the (k,l,m)-decomposition together with a complete proof of the implication; the abstract alone does not supply either, so the support for the theorem cannot be verified from the provided text.
- [Program description and reported families] The program is used to certify that certain families are (k,l,m)-decomposable. The manuscript should therefore include the precise output of the program (or a machine-readable certificate) for at least one non-trivial family, together with a description of the search parameters and termination condition, so that the claimed bounded-cw examples can be independently checked.
minor comments (2)
- [Introduction] Notation for the class Free{C₄, 4K₁} is introduced in the abstract but should be restated at the beginning of the introduction with a brief reminder of the induced-subgraph definition.
- [Unbounded-cw supergraphs] The supergraph construction is stated for 3-clique-coverable graphs; the manuscript should clarify whether the same construction works for graphs with larger clique cover number or whether that case is left open.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness and reproducibility. We address the two major comments below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised version.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Main theorem and definition of (k,l,m)-decomposition] The central theorem (that (k,l,m)-decomposability implies bounded clique-width) is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. The manuscript must therefore contain an explicit, self-contained definition of the (k,l,m)-decomposition together with a complete proof of the implication; the abstract alone does not supply either, so the support for the theorem cannot be verified from the provided text.
Authors: The full manuscript contains both an explicit definition of the (k,l,m)-decomposition (in the section introducing the framework) and a complete proof that (k,l,m)-decomposability of every member of a class implies bounded clique-width. Nevertheless, we accept that these elements must be made more immediately verifiable. In the revision we will (i) state the definition in a dedicated, self-contained subsection with illustrative examples before any applications, (ii) present the central theorem and its proof in full detail immediately after the definition, and (iii) expand the abstract to give a concise outline of the definition and the implication. These changes will ensure the logical support is transparent without altering the theorem itself. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Program description and reported families] The program is used to certify that certain families are (k,l,m)-decomposable. The manuscript should therefore include the precise output of the program (or a machine-readable certificate) for at least one non-trivial family, together with a description of the search parameters and termination condition, so that the claimed bounded-cw examples can be independently checked.
Authors: We agree that the current description of the program is insufficient for independent verification. The revised manuscript will contain a new subsection that specifies: the exact search parameters (bounds on k, l, m and on graph order), the termination condition of the enumeration algorithm, and the concrete output (including a machine-readable certificate or explicit list of decompositions) for at least one non-trivial family. This material will be placed immediately after the description of the program and before the reported families, allowing any reader to reproduce or audit the bounded-clique-width claims. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The central theorem states that any class where every graph is (k,l,m)-decomposable has bounded clique-width, presented as a direct implication proved from the definition of the decomposition itself. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or renamed known result; the program-assisted examples and the separate construction of unbounded-cw supergraphs are independent of the implication and do not create self-referential loops. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks with no quoted reductions to prior author work or ansatzes.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption If a class consists entirely of (k,l,m)-decomposable graphs then it has bounded clique width
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Maffray, Frédéric and Morel, Grégory , urldate =. On. 2012 , langid =. doi:10.1137/110829222 , pages =
-
[2]
Clique cutsets beyond chordal graphs , volume =
Boncompagni, Valerio and Penev, Irena and Vušković, Kristina , urldate =. Clique cutsets beyond chordal graphs , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.endm.2017.10.015 , pages =
-
[3]
Maffray, Frédéric and Penev, Irena and Vušković, Kristina , urldate =. Coloring rings , volume =. doi:10.1002/jgt.22635 , pages =
-
[4]
Bondy, J. A. and Murty, U. S. R. , editorb =. Graph Theory , volume =
-
[5]
Theoretical Computer Science , author =. 2007 , langid =. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.03.043 , pages =
-
[6]
Upper bounds to the clique width of graphs , journal =. 2000 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(99)00184-5 , url =
-
[7]
Clique-Width for 4-Vertex Forbidden Subgraphs , volume =
Brandstädt, Andreas and Engelfriet, Joost and Le, Hoang-Oanh and Lozin, Vadim , year =. Clique-Width for 4-Vertex Forbidden Subgraphs , volume =. Theory of Computing Systems , doi =
-
[8]
Irena Penev , keywords =. On the clique-width of (. Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2020.07.009 , url =
-
[9]
On the Relationship between Clique-Width and Treewidth
Corneil, Derek G.and Rotics, Udi. On the Relationship between Clique-Width and Treewidth. Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. 2001
2001
-
[10]
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section B Mathematics and Mathematical Physics , year=
Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0,1-vertices , author=. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section B Mathematics and Mathematical Physics , year=
-
[11]
Discrete Applied Mathematics , author =
Vertex coloring of graphs with few obstructions , url =. Discrete Applied Mathematics , author =. 2015 , file =
2015
-
[12]
Discrete Mathematics , author =
Coloring (. Discrete Mathematics , author =. 2023 , langid =. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2022.113225 , pages =
-
[13]
Fraser, Dallas J. and Hamel, Angèle M. and Hoàng, Chính T. and Holmes, Kevin and. Characterizations of (. Discrete Applied Mathematics , shortjournal =. 2017 , langid =. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2016.08.016 , pages =
-
[14]
Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya , volume=
A reduction of a graph to a canonical form and an algebra arising during this reduction , author=. Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya , volume=
-
[15]
2021 , KEYWORDS =
Robin, Cléophée , URL =. 2021 , KEYWORDS =
2021
-
[16]
Hoàng and Nicolas Trotignon , keywords =
Chính T. Hoàng and Nicolas Trotignon , keywords =. A class of graphs with large rankwidth , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2023.113699 , url =
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.