pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17765 · v1 · pith:EQGSKMXRnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· gr-qc· hep-ph

Effective description of lensed gravitational waves diffracted by stellar fields

Miguel Zumalac\'arregui , Xikai Shan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qchep-ph
keywords gravitational wavesmicrolensingwave opticssingular value decompositionreduced-order modelingstochastic diffractionlensed gravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Singular value decomposition of simulations produces an effective model for stellar microlensing of gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs reduced-order models that capture the frequency-dependent distortions imprinted on gravitationally lensed gravitational-wave signals by fields of stellar-mass objects. It extracts an optimized orthonormal basis and a probability density for the expansion coefficients directly from wave-optics simulations via singular value decomposition. The resulting description can serve as a prior or consistency check inside Bayesian analyses of detector data. A reader would care because the method makes it feasible to include these small-scale effects when searching for magnified distant mergers without repeating full numerical ray-tracing for every candidate event.

Core claim

Numerical simulations of wave-optics lensing by stellar fields can be compressed, via singular value decomposition, into a compact orthonormal basis together with a probability density function for the coefficients; the resulting Reduced-Order Stochastic Diffraction models then provide an effective description of microlensing distortions that can be injected into or recovered from gravitational-wave data.

What carries the argument

Reduced-Order Stochastic Diffraction (ROSD) models obtained by singular value decomposition of simulated wave-optics lensing outputs, yielding an orthonormal basis for microlensing distortions and a coefficient probability density.

If this is right

  • The models supply priors that can be used directly in Bayesian parameter estimation of lensed gravitational-wave signals.
  • They enable quantitative checks for consistency between observed signals and expectations from stellar-field microlensing.
  • Truncation order can be adjusted to balance accuracy against computational cost for a given detector and source.
  • The same construction procedure can be repeated for other microlens mass functions or external lens potentials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be used to test whether observed lensing statistics deviate from those expected for ordinary stellar populations.
  • If the coefficient distributions prove robust, the same framework might be adapted to search for wave-optics signatures from other compact objects such as primordial black holes.
  • Detector-specific versions of the model could improve the reach of searches for high-redshift binary mergers by removing a previously intractable systematic.

Load-bearing premise

The basis vectors and coefficient distributions extracted from the authors' chosen stellar-field simulations remain representative for actual astrophysical microlens populations and external potentials.

What would settle it

A catalog of confirmed lensed gravitational-wave events whose observed frequency-dependent amplitude and phase modulations lie systematically outside the probability distributions predicted by the SVD coefficient model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17765 by Miguel Zumalac\'arregui, Xikai Shan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Mass distribution of microlenses in the simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Outline of the microlensing-basis construction. Amplification factors from microlensing realizations are converted into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. First components of the microlensing basis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Microlensing weight as a function of macromagni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Microlensing weight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Inverse cumulative distribution of the mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Source-parameter recovery of an injected microlensed signal. We compare the unlensed recovery, the recovery with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Recovery of the microlensing coefficients for the injected microlensed signal. The coefficients shown correspond to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Reconstruction of isolated point-lens diffraction signals with the microlensing SVD basis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As natural telescopes, Gravitational lenses enable the observation of sources that would otherwise be too distant and faint. Stellar-mass objects, or microlenses, act as impurities in the lens, producing subtle distortions of the source. These effects are necessary to correctly interpret observations, and may in some cases be themselves evidence of gravitational magnification. Gravitational waves (GWs) observed by ground detectors and magnified by galaxies and clusters will undergo microlensing by fields of stars and remnants: describing these systems requires not only considering a large number of small-scale lenses (microlenses), but also including wave-optics effects, leading to frequency dependent modulations of the signal. Here we present novel models for Reduced-Order Stochastic Diffraction (ROSD), which overcome these challenges in the search for GW lensing signatures: an effective description is synthesized from numerical simulations of wave-optics lensing by stellar fields via a singular value decomposition. The procedure yields an optimized orthonormal basis to describe microlensing distortions and a probability density function for the coefficients, which can be used as priors or to verify the consistency with stellar-field lensing. We present SVD-stellar-I5-aLIGO as an example of this model category, discuss the role of truncation order and demonstrate how it can be applied to GW data via injection and recovery in Bayesian parameter estimation. ROSD can be tailored to account for detector sensitivity and the type of source under analysis, and extended to different microlens populations and external potentials. ROSD models open a new window to probe small-scale objects (stars, remnants and potentially dark matter) and facilitate the discovery of the most distant compact binary mergers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce Reduced-Order Stochastic Diffraction (ROSD) models that synthesize an effective description of wave-optics microlensing distortions of gravitational waves by stellar fields. An orthonormal basis and coefficient probability density function are extracted via singular value decomposition from a chosen ensemble of numerical simulations; the resulting models (exemplified by SVD-stellar-I5-aLIGO) are proposed for use as priors or consistency checks and are illustrated with an injection-recovery test in Bayesian parameter estimation.

Significance. If the SVD-derived basis and PDF prove representative across astrophysical parameter space, the approach would supply a computationally tractable, data-driven framework for incorporating frequency-dependent microlensing effects into GW searches, thereby enabling more accurate interpretation of strongly lensed events and potential constraints on small-scale lens populations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and injection-recovery demonstration: the test is described only at a high level with no reported quantitative metrics (bias, credible-interval coverage, or recovery accuracy as a function of truncation order), leaving the claim that the truncated model remains faithful unsupported by concrete error budgets.
  2. [ROSD construction (implied in abstract)] The central construction extracts the basis and coefficient PDF from a fixed simulation ensemble; no tests are shown that vary stellar number density, mass function, spatial clustering, or external convergence/shear to verify that the leading modes and PDF remain representative when the underlying astrophysical parameters change.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and injection-recovery demonstration: the test is described only at a high level with no reported quantitative metrics (bias, credible-interval coverage, or recovery accuracy as a function of truncation order), leaving the claim that the truncated model remains faithful unsupported by concrete error budgets.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract describes the injection-recovery demonstration at a high level. The full manuscript presents the test as an illustration of applicability in Bayesian parameter estimation. To strengthen the support for the claim that the truncated model remains faithful, we will add quantitative metrics including bias, credible-interval coverage, and recovery accuracy as a function of truncation order. These will be incorporated into the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [ROSD construction (implied in abstract)] The central construction extracts the basis and coefficient PDF from a fixed simulation ensemble; no tests are shown that vary stellar number density, mass function, spatial clustering, or external convergence/shear to verify that the leading modes and PDF remain representative when the underlying astrophysical parameters change.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the presented ROSD model is constructed from a fixed simulation ensemble. The manuscript states that ROSD can be tailored to different microlens populations and external potentials, but no explicit variation tests are included. This is a scope limitation of the current study, as a full sensitivity analysis would require additional simulations beyond the scope of this work. We will revise the text to clarify the ensemble's representativeness for the chosen parameters and note that extensions to varied astrophysical conditions are left for future work. The core results and construction remain unchanged. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: SVD reduction applied to independent simulation ensemble

full rationale

The paper constructs the ROSD effective model by running wave-optics simulations of stellar microlensing and then performing SVD to extract an orthonormal basis and coefficient PDF. This is a standard data-driven dimensionality reduction whose output is not equivalent to the input by construction; the basis and PDF are then used as priors or consistency checks on separate GW data via injection/recovery. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-definitional loop. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The approach rests on numerical simulations whose detailed setup is not specified in the abstract; the SVD step itself is standard linear algebra.

free parameters (1)
  • truncation order
    Order at which the SVD basis is cut off; chosen to balance fidelity and speed but not derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Singular value decomposition yields an optimal low-rank orthonormal basis for the space of simulated distortion functions
    Invoked when the effective description is synthesized from the simulation ensemble.
invented entities (1)
  • ROSD model (SVD-stellar-I5-aLIGO) no independent evidence
    purpose: Compact stochastic representation of stellar-field microlensing distortions
    New modeling construct introduced by the paper; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5841 in / 1235 out tokens · 32095 ms · 2026-06-26T23:37:32.366496+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wave-optics imprints of dark matter subhalos on strongly lensed gravitational waves. II. Saddle images and detectability

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Subhalos produce percent-level modulations in saddle and minimum images; matched-filter analysis yields >5σ combined detections in 62% of realizations for fiducial sources near caustics, projecting 10-20 substructure ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 38 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992)

    1992

  2. [2]

    Meylan, P

    G. Meylan, P. Jetzer, and P. North, eds.,Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro, Saas-Fee Advanced Course, Vol. 33 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Chang and S

    K. Chang and S. Refsdal, Nature282, 561 (1979)

    1979

  4. [4]

    Paczynski, Astrophys

    B. Paczynski, Astrophys. J.304, 1 (1986)

    1986

  5. [5]

    Wambsganss, inGravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro, edited by G

    J. Wambsganss, inGravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro, edited by G. Meylan, P. Jetzer, and P. North (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp. 453– 540, arXiv:astro-ph/0604278

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Mao, Res

    S. Mao, Res. Astron. Astrophys.12, 947 (2012), arXiv:1207.3720 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    B. S. Gaudi, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.50, 411 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    P. L. Schechter and J. Wambsganss, Astrophys. J.580, 685 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204425

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Vernardos, D

    G. Vernardos, D. Sluse, D. Pooley, R. W. Schmidt, M. Millon, L. Weisenbach, V. Motta, T. Anguita, 18 P. Saha, M. O’Dowd, A. Peel, and P. L. Schechter, Space Sci. Rev.220, 14 (2024), arXiv:2312.00931 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    S. H. Suyu, A. Goobar, T. Collett, A. More, and G. Vernardos, Space Sci. Rev.220, 13 (2024), arXiv:2301.07729 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Venumadhav, L

    T. Venumadhav, L. Dai, and J. Miralda-Escud´ e, As- trophys. J.850, 49 (2017), arXiv:1707.00003 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Oguri, J

    M. Oguri, J. M. Diego, N. Kaiser, P. L. Kelly, and T. Broadhurst, Phys. Rev. D97, 023518 (2018), arXiv:1710.00148 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    J. M. Diego, Astron. Astrophys.625, A84 (2019), arXiv:1806.04668 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Weisenbach, T

    L. Weisenbach, T. Anguita, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Oguri, P. Saha, and P. L. Schechter, Space Sci. Rev. 220, 57 (2024), arXiv:2404.08094 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Takahashi and T

    R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Astrophys. J.595, 1039 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    Christian, S

    P. Christian, S. Vitale, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D98, 103022 (2018), arXiv:1802.02586 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Dai, S.-S

    L. Dai, S.-S. Li, B. Zackay, S. Mao, and Y. Lu, Phys. Rev. D98, 104029 (2018), arXiv:1810.00003 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    M. H. Y. Cheung, J. Gais, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.503, 3326 (2021), arXiv:2012.07800 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [20]

    S. M. C. Yeung, M. H. Y. Cheung, E. Seo, J. A. J. Gais, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 2230 (2023), arXiv:2112.07635 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [21]

    J. M. Diego, O. A. Hannuksela, P. L. Kelly, T. Broad- hurst, K. Kim, T. G. F. Li, G. F. Smoot, and G. Pagano, Astron. Astrophys.627, A130 (2019), arXiv:1903.04513 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [22]

    J. M. Diego, Phys. Rev. D101, 123512 (2020), arXiv:1911.05736 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  22. [23]

    Oguri and R

    M. Oguri and R. Takahashi, Astrophys. J.901, 58 (2020), arXiv:2007.01936 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  23. [24]

    Mishra, A

    A. Mishra, A. K. Meena, A. More, S. Bose, and J. S. Bagla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 4869 (2021), arXiv:2102.03946 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  24. [25]

    A. K. Meena, A. Mishra, A. More, S. Bose, and J. S. Bagla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517, 872 (2022), arXiv:2205.05409 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Oguri and R

    M. Oguri and R. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D106, 043532 (2022), arXiv:2204.00814 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [27]

    X. Shan, G. Li, X. Chen, W. Zheng, and W. Zhao, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 239511 (2023), arXiv:2208.13566 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [28]

    X. Shan, X. Chen, B. Hu, and R.-G. Cai, (2023), arXiv:2301.06117 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [29]

    X. Shan, X. Chen, B. Hu, and G. Li, (2023), arXiv:2306.14796 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  29. [30]

    G. P. Smithet al., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A383, 20240134 (2025), arXiv:2503.19973 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    A. K. Meena, J. Astrophys. Astron.46, 92 (2025), arXiv:2502.11488 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    X. Shan, H. Yang, S. Mao, and O. A. Hannuksela, (2025), arXiv:2508.21262 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [33]

    Ulmer and J

    A. Ulmer and J. Goodman, Astrophys. J.442, 67 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9406042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  33. [34]

    Jaroszynski and B

    M. Jaroszynski and B. Paczynski, Astrophys. J.455, 443 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9503043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  34. [35]

    Villarrubia-Rojo, S

    H. Villarrubia-Rojo, S. Savastano, M. Zumalac´ arregui, L. Choi, S. Goyal, L. Dai, and G. Tambalo, Phys. Rev. D111, 103539 (2025), arXiv:2409.04606 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [36]

    Feldbrugge, U.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, U.-L. Pen, and N. Turok, Annals Phys. 451, 169255 (2023), arXiv:1909.04632 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [37]

    Tambalo, M

    G. Tambalo, M. Zumalac´ arregui, L. Dai, and M. H.- Y. Cheung, Phys. Rev. D108, 043527 (2023), arXiv:2210.05658 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  37. [38]

    X. Shan, G. Li, X. Chen, W. Zhao, B. Hu, and S. Mao, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 219512 (2025), arXiv:2409.06747 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. K. Y. Ng, M. Zumalac´ arregui, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D109, 124020 (2024), arXiv:2403.13876 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  39. [40]

    S. M. C. Yeung, M. H. Y. Cheung, M. Zumalacarregui, and O. A. Hannuksela, (2024), arXiv:2410.19804 [astro- ph.IM]

    arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    Ephremidze, M

    N. Ephremidze, M. Kamionkowski, and C. Dvorkin, (2026), arXiv:2603.12333 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [42]

    Wright and M

    M. Wright and M. Hendry, The Astrophysical Journal 935, 68 (2022)

    2022

  42. [43]

    Caldarola, S

    M. Caldarola, S. Goyal, N. Gupte, S. R. Green, and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Phys. Rev. D113, 104073 (2026), arXiv:2511.08486 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [44]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. 923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), As- trophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), As- trophys. J.970, 191 (2024), arXiv:2304.08393 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures (2025), arXiv:2512.16347 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    Goyal, H

    S. Goyal, H. Villarrubia-Rojo, and M. Zumalacarregui, (2025), arXiv:2512.17631 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    X. Shan, H. Yang, and S. Mao, (2025), arXiv:2512.19118 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    A. Liu, I. C. F. Wong, S. H. W. Leong, A. More, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.525, 4149 (2023), arXiv:2302.09870 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    J. C. L. Chan, L. Maga˜ na Zertuche, J. M. Ezquiaga, R. K. L. Lo, L. Vujeva, and J. Bowman, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024041 (2026), arXiv:2511.07186 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  50. [51]

    Q. Hu, H. Narola, J. Heynen, M. Wright, J. Veitch, J. Janquart, and C. Van Den Broeck, (2025), arXiv:2512.17550 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee, Astrophys. J.984, 107 (2025), arXiv:2410.06995 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    E. Seo, X. Shan, J. Janquart, O. A. Hannuksela, M. A. Hendry, and B. Hu, Astrophys. J.988, 159 (2025), arXiv:2503.02186 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee, (2025), arXiv:2503.16281 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Z. Su, X. Shan, Z. Lyu, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Mao, and H. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2510.17125 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    S. E. Field, C. R. Galley, J. S. Hesthaven, J. Kaye, and M. Tiglio, Phys. Rev. X4, 031006 (2014), arXiv:1308.3565 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [57]

    Canizares, S

    P. Canizares, S. E. Field, J. Gair, V. Raymond, R. Smith, and M. Tiglio, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 071104 (2015), arXiv:1404.6284 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [58]

    Blackman, S

    J. Blackman, S. E. Field, C. R. Galley, B. Szil´ agyi, M. A. Scheel, M. Tiglio, and D. A. Hemberger, Phys. Rev. 19 Lett.115, 121102 (2015), arXiv:1502.07758 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [59]

    U. Deka, G. Prabhu, M. A. Shaikh, S. J. Kapadia, V. Varma, and S. E. Field, Phys. Rev. D111, 104042 (2025), arXiv:2501.02974 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [60]

    Warren and S

    S. Warren and S. Dye, Astrophys. J.590, 673 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302587

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  60. [61]

    S. H. Suyu, P. J. Marshall, M. P. Hobson, and R. D. Blandford, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.371, 983 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601493

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  61. [62]

    Zheng, X

    W. Zheng, X. Chen, G. Li, and H.-z. Chen, Astrophys. J.931, 114 (2022), arXiv:2204.10871 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2022

  62. [63]

    X. Chen, Y. Shu, G. Li, and W. Zheng, Astrophys. J. 923, 117 (2021), arXiv:2110.07643 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [64]

    Kormann, P

    R. Kormann, P. Schneider, and M. Bartelmann, Astron. Astrophys.284, 285 (1994)

    1994

  64. [65]

    Chabrier, Publ

    G. Chabrier, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.115, 763 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0304382

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [66]

    Spera, M

    M. Spera, M. Mapelli, and A. Bressan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.451, 4086 (2015), arXiv:1505.05201 [astro- ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [67]

    Madau and M

    P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.52, 415 (2014), arXiv:1403.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [68]

    Dai and T

    L. Dai and T. Venumadhav, (2017), arXiv:1702.04724 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [69]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, D. E. Holz, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D103, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2008.12814 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  69. [70]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2605.27226 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  71. [72]

    L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, and K. Sigurdson, Phys. Rev. D95, 044011 (2017), arXiv:1605.09398 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [73]

    K. K. Y. Ng, K. W. K. Wong, T. Broadhurst, and T. G. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D97, 023012 (2018), arXiv:1703.06319 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [74]

    Oguri, Mon

    M. Oguri, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480, 3842 (2018), arXiv:1807.02584 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [75]

    A. R. A. C. Wierda, E. Wempe, O. A. Hannuksela, L. e. V. E. Koopmans, and C. Van Den Broeck, Astrophys. J.921, 154 (2021), arXiv:2106.06303 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  75. [76]

    F. Xu, J. M. Ezquiaga, and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. 929, 9 (2022), arXiv:2105.14390 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  76. [77]

    Y. Li, K. Liao, M. Sun, L. Yang, X. Ding, M. Biesi- ada, and T. Liu, Astrophys. J. Suppl.284, 56 (2026), arXiv:2603.09289 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  77. [78]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]. [79]Advanced LIGO anticipated sensitivity curves, Tech. Rep. LIGO-T0900288 (LIGO Document Control Cen- ter, 2009)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [79]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A8 (2020), arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  79. [80]

    Reitze, R

    D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Barsotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne, R. Eisenstein, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, E. D. Hall, A. Lazzarini, G. Lovelace, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. Shoemaker, J. Smith, C. Torrie, S. Vitale, R. Weiss, C. Wipf, and M. Zucker, inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51 (...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [81]

    Sathyaprakash, M

    B. Sathyaprakash, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Ajith, B. Allen, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, S. Aoudia, K. Arun, P. Astone, B. Krishnan, L. Barack, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Bassan, R. Bassiri, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, M. Bizouard, C. Bond, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, M. Britzger, F. Brueck- ner, T. Bulik, H. J. Bulten, O. B...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

Showing first 80 references.