pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23742 · v1 · pith:K5P2ABMAnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.AR

Low-power analogue neural networks with trainable nonlinear connections for continuous control

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.AR
keywords analogue neural networksKolmogorov-Arnold networkstrainable nonlinear connectionscontinuous controlfield-programmable analogue arraysrobotic kinematicslow-power hardwarephotovoltaic maximum power point tracking
0
0 comments X

The pith

Placing trainable nonlinear functions on analogue connections lets networks represent smooth continuous targets with far fewer nodes than multilayer perceptrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that analogue neural networks inspired by Kolmogorov-Arnold networks, with trainable nonlinear band-pass filters placed on each connection rather than scalar weights, efficiently capture smooth continuously valued functions such as robotic joint trajectories and photovoltaic power-point tracking. This architecture yields a clear reduction in nodes and connections compared with standard multilayer perceptrons precisely when the target function is smooth, while showing no such advantage on tasks with sharp decision boundaries. Trained instances transfer to physical field-programmable analogue arrays across roughly 35,000 connections with measurable fidelity, and a projected dedicated CMOS version would run at approximately 30 microwatts. A memristive simulation reproduces the same efficiency pattern, confirming that the gain arises from the placement of nonlinearity on connections rather than from any specific device physics.

Core claim

Realising trainable nonlinear functions as analogue band-pass filters on field-programmable analogue arrays allows the networks to represent smooth, continuously valued targets, including robotic kinematics, continuous control, and photovoltaic maximum-power-point tracking, with far fewer nodes and connections than multilayer perceptrons, while offering no parameter-efficiency advantage on classification-like decision boundaries; the same behaviour appears in a memristive simulation, indicating the advantage stems from trainable nonlinearity on connections.

What carries the argument

Trainable nonlinear connections realised as analogue band-pass filters on field-programmable analogue arrays

If this is right

  • Networks achieve the same task performance on robotic kinematics and photovoltaic tracking using substantially fewer nodes and connections than multilayer perceptrons.
  • Trained networks map to physical hardware across approximately 35,000 connections with quantified fidelity.
  • A dedicated CMOS implementation is projected to operate at approximately 30 microwatts.
  • A memristive version reproduces the identical parameter-efficiency pattern, showing the gain is independent of any single device technology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same connection-wise nonlinearity could be ported to other physical substrates whose native device responses already supply smooth nonlinearities, potentially extending the efficiency gain beyond field-programmable analogue arrays.
  • For sensor-driven continuous control loops that must remain always on, the projected microwatt power budget opens the possibility of embedding the entire controller inside the sensor package without external digital processors.
  • Because the advantage vanishes on non-smooth decision boundaries, hybrid systems could route smooth sub-tasks to the analogue nonlinear network and discrete sub-tasks to conventional digital layers.

Load-bearing premise

The computational benefit appears only for tasks whose targets are smooth and follows directly from the smoothness of the underlying physical basis.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on a smooth continuous-control benchmark in which the nonlinear-connection network requires equal or greater total parameters than a multilayer perceptron of comparable accuracy, or a hardware transfer whose output fidelity falls below the level needed for closed-loop stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23742 by Adnan Mehonic, Alexander McDonnell, Charles Swindells, Eleni Vasilaki, Fernando Aguirre, Finley Robins, Ian T. Vidamour, Ivan Y. Tyukin, Jack C. Gartside, Luca Manneschi, Martin Trefzer, Matthew O. A. Ellis, Oliver J. Sutton, Susan Stepney, Thomas J. Hayward, Tony Kenyon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Constructing trainable nonlinear connections from analogue filters. (a) Schematic of network components (PhyKAN). Inputs are encoded as frequencies at network nodes, which pass signals to network edges. Edges are univariate functions, and here edge ba￾sis functions resemble tuneable band-pass filters. These filters consist of high-pass, low-pass, and amplification stages. Multiple basis functions (band-pas… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Six-axis Robot Arm Kinematics with Analogue Electronic Networks. (a) Schematic diagram showing the joint configuration of the six-axis IRB120 commercial robotic ma￾nipulator modelled here. Rotational axes are shown in grey, where φi denotes the joint angle at each of the joints, and black arrows show the plane of rotation around each of the joints. The payload (end-effector) location is shown in black. (b)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Continuous-Action CartPole Control with Analogue Electronic Networks. (a) Schematic diagram of the CartPole task. The actor provides a continuous output corresponding to a vector force applied to the cart, with the goal of keeping the pole displacement, x, and pole angle, θ close to zero. (b) and (c) compare the average duration for which the agent maintains the pole upright between analogue electronic net… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Cells Under Partial Shading Conditions (MPPT). (a) Schematic diagram of the MPPT task. Four arrays operate under variable irradiance. A state vector of current, voltage, power, and change in power is passed to a network, which outputs a voltage change to a voltage-booster circuit, and as a consequence changes the generated power and current across the arrays. (… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Memristor-based PhyKANs. (a) Circuit topology of the underlying nonlinear element, showing the input and reference voltages, operational amplifier, memristor (MR), and output load. (b-d) Performance comparison between MLPs (black) and MemKANs (red) for the (b) six-axis forward kinematics task, (c) CartPole task, and (d) photovoltaic-cell control task. Markers show mean performance and shaded regions show t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Physical neural networks promise low-power machine learning by computing directly with analogue device physics, but most architectures force nonlinear device responses to act as scalar weights. Inspired by Kolmogorov-Arnold networks, we place trainable nonlinear functions on the connections, making each physical connection a learnable computational element. Realising these functions as analogue band-pass filters on field-programmable analogue arrays, we find that the benefit is task-dependent and follows from the smoothness of the physical basis: the networks represent smooth, continuously valued targets, including robotic kinematics, continuous control, and photovoltaic maximum-power-point tracking, with far fewer nodes and connections than multilayer perceptrons, but offer no parameter-efficiency advantage on classification-like decision boundaries. Trained networks transfer to hardware across approximately 35,000 connections with quantified fidelity, and a dedicated CMOS implementation is projected to operate at approximately 30 microwatts. A memristive realisation reproduces the same behaviour in simulation, indicating that the advantage comes from placing trainable nonlinearity on connections, rather than from a particular device.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces analogue neural networks that place trainable nonlinear functions (implemented as band-pass filters on field-programmable analogue arrays) on the connections rather than using scalar weights, drawing inspiration from Kolmogorov-Arnold networks. It claims that this yields parameter-efficiency gains specifically for smooth, continuously valued targets such as robotic kinematics, continuous control, and photovoltaic maximum-power-point tracking—using far fewer nodes and connections than multilayer perceptrons—while showing no such advantage on classification-like tasks. The work reports successful hardware transfer of trained networks across ~35,000 connections with quantified fidelity, projects ~30 µW operation for a dedicated CMOS implementation, and reproduces the behavior in memristor simulations to argue that the advantage arises from the placement of trainable nonlinearity on connections.

Significance. If the empirical hardware results and task-dependent comparisons hold, the architecture offers a concrete route to low-power physical neural networks for continuous-control domains by exploiting device physics directly for edge nonlinearities. The explicit hardware transfer across tens of thousands of connections and the memristive simulation check are strengths that distinguish the contribution from purely theoretical proposals.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claims (hardware transfer fidelity, node/connection counts versus MLPs, task-dependent advantage, power projection) are stated without accompanying metrics, baselines, error bars, or experimental protocol summaries, which reduces verifiability of the headline results even though the full manuscript presumably contains these details.
  2. The manuscript should clarify whether the reported node/connection savings are measured at equivalent task performance (e.g., same mean-squared error or tracking accuracy) or at a fixed architecture size; this distinction is load-bearing for the parameter-efficiency claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on analogue neural networks with trainable nonlinear connections and for recommending minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on empirical hardware transfer experiments across ~35,000 connections and separate memristor simulations, with performance advantages presented as observed, task-dependent outcomes for smooth continuous targets rather than derived necessities. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked in a load-bearing way that reduces predictions to inputs by construction; the Kolmogorov-Arnold inspiration is external and the advantage is explicitly attributed to the placement of nonlinearity on connections, not to any internal self-referential step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the domain assumption that band-pass filter smoothness matches continuous task requirements and that training transfers reliably to hardware; no ad-hoc fitted constants or new entities are introduced beyond standard training parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • band-pass filter parameters
    Trainable parameters of the nonlinear connection functions are learned to match target tasks.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The analogue band-pass filters provide a smooth physical basis suitable for continuous valued targets
    Invoked to explain task-dependent performance advantage over MLPs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 1163 out tokens · 52656 ms · 2026-06-26T10:18:31.243033+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Physics for neuro- morphic computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 2(9):499–510, September 2020

    Danijela Marković, Alice Mizrahi, Damien Querlioz, and Julie Grollier. Physics for neuro- morphic computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 2(9):499–510, September 2020. doi: 10.1038/ s42254-020-0208-2

  2. [2]

    Trainable hardware for dynamical computing using error backpropagation through physical media.Nature Communications, 6(1):6729, March 2015

    Michiel Hermans, Michaël Burm, Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Joni Dambre, and Peter Bien- stman. Trainable hardware for dynamical computing using error backpropagation through physical media.Nature Communications, 6(1):6729, March 2015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7729

  3. [3]

    Physical deep learning with biologically inspired training method: gradient-free approach for physical hardware.Nature Communications, 13(1):7847, 2022

    Mitsumasa Nakajima, Katsuma Inoue, Kenji Tanaka, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Toshikazu Hashimoto, and Kohei Nakajima. Physical deep learning with biologically inspired training method: gradient-free approach for physical hardware.Nature Communications, 13(1):7847, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35216-2

  4. [4]

    Toward a formal theory for computing machines made out of whatever physics offers.Nature Communications, 14(1):4911,

    Herbert Jaeger, Beatriz Noheda, and Wilfred G Van Der Wiel. Toward a formal theory for computing machines made out of whatever physics offers.Nature Communications, 14(1):4911,

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40533-1

  6. [6]

    Memristors for energy-efficient new computing paradigms.Advanced Electronic Materials, 2 (9):1600090, 2016

    Doo Seok Jeong, Kyung Min Kim, Sungho Kim, Byung Joon Choi, and Cheol Seong Hwang. Memristors for energy-efficient new computing paradigms.Advanced Electronic Materials, 2 (9):1600090, 2016. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201600090. 25

  7. [7]

    Memorydevicesandappli- cationsforin-memorycomputing.Nat.Nanotechnol.15,529–544,10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z (2020)

    Abu Sebastian, Manuel Le Gallo, Riduan Khaddam-Aljameh, and Evangelos Eleftheriou. Mem- ory devices and applications for in-memory computing.Nature Nanotechnology, 15(7):529–544, July 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z

  8. [8]

    , Sebastian , A

    Fernando Aguirre, Abu Sebastian, Manuel Le Gallo, Wenhao Song, Tong Wang, J Joshua Yang, Wei Lu, Meng-Fan Chang, Daniele Ielmini, Yuchao Yang, Adnan Mehonic, Anthony Kenyon, et al. Hardware implementation of memristor-based artificial neural networks.Nature Communications, 15:1974, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45670-9

  9. [9]

    A perspective on physical reservoir computing with nanomagnetic devices.Applied Physics Letters, 122(4):040501, 2023

    Dan A Allwood, Matthew OA Ellis, David Griffin, Thomas J Hayward, Luca Manneschi, Mohammad F Musameh, Simon O’Keefe, Susan Stepney, Charles Swindells, Martin A Trefzer, et al. A perspective on physical reservoir computing with nanomagnetic devices.Applied Physics Letters, 122(4):040501, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0119040

  10. [10]

    Stenning, Jack C

    Kilian D. Stenning, Jack C. Gartside, ..., Eleni Vasilaki, and Will R. Branford. Neuromorphic overparameterisation and few-shot learning in multilayer physical neural networks.Nature Communications, 15(1):7377, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50633-1

  11. [11]

    Kazanskiy, Muhammad A

    Nikolay L Kazanskiy, Muhammad A Butt, and Svetlana N Khonina. Optical computing: Status and perspectives.Nanomaterials, 12(13):2171, 2022. doi: 10.3390/nano12132171

  12. [12]

    Physical reservoir computing with emerging electronics.Nature Electronics, 7(3):193–206, 2024

    Xiangpeng Liang, Jianshi Tang, Yanan Zhong, Bin Gao, He Qian, and Huaqiang Wu. Physical reservoir computing with emerging electronics.Nature Electronics, 7(3):193–206, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41928-024-01133-z

  13. [13]

    KAN: Kolmogorov–arnold networks.International Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2025

    Ziming Liu, Yixuan Wang, Sachin Vaidya, Fabian Ruehle, James Halverson, Marin Soljačić, Thomas Y Hou, and Max Tegmark. KAN: Kolmogorov–arnold networks.International Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2025

  14. [14]

    G., Onodera, T., Stein, M

    Logan G Wright, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Martin M Stein, Tianyu Wang, Darren T Schachter, Zoey Hu, and Peter L McMahon. Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation. Nature, 601(7894):549–555, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04223-6

  15. [15]

    Vidamour, ..., and Eleni Vasilaki

    Luca Manneschi, Ian T. Vidamour, ..., and Eleni Vasilaki. Noise-aware training of neuro- morphic dynamic device networks.Nature Communications, 16:9192, 2025. doi: 10.1038/ s41467-025-64232-1

  16. [16]

    Backpropagation-free training of deep physical neural networks.Science, 382(6676):1297–1303,

    Ali Momeni, Babak Rahmani, Matthieu Malléjac, Philipp del Hougne, and Romain Fleury. Backpropagation-free training of deep physical neural networks.Science, 382(6676):1297–1303,

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.1126/science.adi8474

  18. [18]

    Physical neural networks using sharpness-aware training.Nature Com- munications, 17:1766, 2026

    Tengji Xu, Zeyu Luo, Shaojie Liu, Li Fan, Qiarong Xiao, Benshan Wang, Dongliang Wang, and Chaoran Huang. Physical neural networks using sharpness-aware training.Nature Com- munications, 17:1766, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68470-9

  19. [19]

    Photonic KAN: a kolmogorov–arnold network inspired efficient neuromorphic accelerator.Optical Fiber Com- munication Conference, page W2A.40, 2025

    Yiwei Peng, Sean Hooten, Xinling Yu, Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Yuan Yuan, Xian Xiao, Bassem Tossoun, Stanley Cheung, Marco Fiorentino, and Raymond Beausoleil. Photonic KAN: a kolmogorov–arnold network inspired efficient neuromorphic accelerator.Optical Fiber Com- munication Conference, page W2A.40, 2025. doi: 10.1364/OFC.2025.W2A.40

  20. [20]

    Small-scale photonic kolmogorov-arnold networks using standard telecom nonlinear modules, 2026

    Luca Nogueira Calçado, Sergei K Turitsyn, and Egor Manuylovich. Small-scale photonic kolmogorov-arnold networks using standard telecom nonlinear modules, 2026. 26

  21. [21]

    Computing-in-memory architecture for kolmogorov-arnold networks based on tunable gaussian-like memory cells.Nature Communi- cations, 17:3496, 2026

    Zhixing Wen, Qirui Zhang, Jiangang Chen, Tianhua Yang, Fan Yang, Xuemei Wang, Qing Liu, Xiao Luo, Peng Lin, Liang-Jian Deng, et al. Computing-in-memory architecture for kolmogorov-arnold networks based on tunable gaussian-like memory cells.Nature Communi- cations, 17:3496, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69592-w

  22. [22]

    Hay- ward, Marco Fanciulli, and Jack C

    Fabiana Taglietti, Andrea Pulici, Maxwell Roxburgh, Gabriele Seguini, Ian Vidamour, Stephan Menzel, Edoardo Franco, Michele Laus, Eleni Vasilaki, Michele Perego, Thomas J. Hay- ward, Marco Fanciulli, and Jack C. Gartside. Learning nonlinear heterogeneity in physical kolmogorov-arnold networks, 2026

  23. [23]

    Physical analog kolmogorov-arnold networks based on reconfigurable nonlinear-processing units, 2026

    Manuel Escudero, Mohamadreza Zolfagharinejad, Sjoerd van den Belt, Nikolaos Alachiotis, and Wilfred G van der Wiel. Physical analog kolmogorov-arnold networks based on reconfigurable nonlinear-processing units, 2026

  24. [24]

    Science Advances 6(16), eaay2631 (2020)

    Silviu-Marian Udrescu and Max Tegmark. Ai feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression.Science Advances, 6(16):eaay2631, 2020. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay2631

  25. [25]

    Sandi Baressi Šegota, Nikola Anđelić, Vedran Mrzljak, Ivan Lorencin, Ivan Kuric, and Zla- tan Car. Utilization of multilayer perceptron for determining the inverse kinematics of an industrial robotic manipulator.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 18(4): 1729881420925283, 2021. doi: 10.1177/1729881420925283

  26. [26]

    Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Alexander N

    Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Alexander N. Gorban, and Ivan Y. Tyukin. Relative intrinsic dimensionality is intrinsic to learning. In Lazaros Iliadis, Antonios Papaleonidas, Plamen Angelov, and Chrisina Jayne, editors,Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2023, pages 516–529, Cham, 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-031- 44207-0

  27. [27]

    A review on mppt techniques of pv system under partial shading condition.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80:854–867, 2017

    Alivarani Mohapatra, Byamakesh Nayak, Priti Das, and Kanungo Barada Mohanty. A review on mppt techniques of pv system under partial shading condition.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80:854–867, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.083

  28. [28]

    L. O. Chua. Memristor—the missing circuit element.IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, 18(5):507–519, 1971. doi: 10.1109/TCT.1971.1083337

  29. [29]

    Strukov, Gregory S

    Dmitri B. Strukov, Gregory S. Snider, Duncan R. Stewart, and R. Stanley Williams. The missing memristor found.Nature, 453(7191):80–83, May 2008. doi: 10.1038/nature06932

  30. [30]

    Waser.Nanoelectronics and Information Technology

    R. Waser.Nanoelectronics and Information Technology. Wiley-VCH, 2009

  31. [31]

    Nanobatteries in redox-based resistive switches require extension of memristor theory.Nature Communications, 4:1771, 2013

    Ilia Valov, Eike Linn, Stefan Tappertzhofen, Sebastian Schmelzer, Jan van den Hurk, Florian Lentz, and Rainer Waser. Nanobatteries in redox-based resistive switches require extension of memristor theory.Nature Communications, 4:1771, 2013. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2784

  32. [32]

    S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng.Physics of Semiconductor Devices. Wiley, 2006

  33. [33]

    Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it.Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10):1550–1560, 1990

    Paul J Werbos. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it.Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(10):1550–1560, 1990

  34. [34]

    A solution to the learning dilemma for recurrent networks of spiking neurons.Nature Communications, 11(1):3625, July 2020

    Guillaume Bellec, Franz Scherr, Anand Subramoney, Elias Hajek, Darjan Salaj, Robert Leg- enstein, and Wolfgang Maass. A solution to the learning dilemma for recurrent networks of spiking neurons.Nature Communications, 11(1):3625, July 2020. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10. 27 1038/s41467-020-17236-y. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17236-y. Number: ...

  35. [35]

    Estimating or propagating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional computation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3432, 2013

    Yoshua Bengio, Nicholas Léonard, and Aaron Courville. Estimating or propagating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional computation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3432, 2013

  36. [36]

    Deterministic policy gradient algorithms

    David Silver, Guy Lever, Nicolas Heess, Thomas Degris, Daan Wierstra, and Martin Riedmiller. Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. In Eric P. Xing and Tony Jebara, editors,Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 32 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 387–395, Beijing, China, 2014. PMLR

  37. [37]

    Lillicrap, Jonathan J

    Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jonathan J. Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016

  38. [38]

    Neuronlike adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control problems,

    Andrew G. Barto, Richard S. Sutton, and Charles W. Anderson. Neuronlike adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control problems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(5):834–846, 1983. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313077

  39. [39]

    Openai gym, 2016

    Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. Openai gym, 2016

  40. [40]

    Pv string partial shading model

    Rodney Tan. Pv string partial shading model. MATLAB Central File Ex- change, 2025. URLhttps://uk.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/ 62743-pv-string-partial-shading-model. Accessed 22 October 2025

  41. [41]

    A deep reinforcement learning-based mppt control for pv systems under partial shading condition.Sensors, 20(11):3039, 2020

    Bao Chau Phan, Ying-Chih Lai, and Chin E Lin. A deep reinforcement learning-based mppt control for pv systems under partial shading condition.Sensors, 20(11):3039, 2020. doi: 10. 3390/s20113039

  42. [42]

    Spice implementation of the dynamic memdiode model for bipolar resistive switching devices.Micromachines, 13(2):330,

    Fernando Leonel Aguirre, Jordi Suñé, and Enrique Miranda. Spice implementation of the dynamic memdiode model for bipolar resistive switching devices.Micromachines, 13(2):330,

  43. [43]

    doi: 10.3390/mi13020330

  44. [44]

    A power-efficient reconfigurable ota-c filter for low-frequency biomedical applications.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 65(2):543–555,

    Sheng-Yu Peng, Yu-Hsien Lee, Tzu-Yun Wang, Hui-Chun Huang, Min-Rui Lai, Chiang-Hsi Lee, and Li-Han Liu. A power-efficient reconfigurable ota-c filter for low-frequency biomedical applications.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 65(2):543–555,

  45. [45]

    doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2728809

  46. [46]

    Low-voltage ota–c filter with an area- and power-efficient ota for biosignal sensor applications.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 13(1):56–67, 2019

    Shuenn-Yuh Lee, Cheng-Pin Wang, and Yuan-Sun Chu. Low-voltage ota–c filter with an area- and power-efficient ota for biosignal sensor applications.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 13(1):56–67, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2882521

  47. [47]

    Real-Time Depth From Focus on a Programmable Focal Plane Processor

    Urs Denier. Analysis and design of an ultralow-power cmos relaxation oscillator.IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 57(8):1973–1982, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TCSI. 2010.2041504

  48. [48]

    OpenAI Gym

    Anand Savanth, Alex S. Weddell, James Myers, David Flynn, and Bashir M. Al-Hashimi. A sub-nw/khz relaxation oscillator with ratioed reference and sub-clock power gated compara- tor.IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 54(11):3097–3106, 2019. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2019. 2930360. 28 Supplementary Material:Trainable nonlinear connections for low-power control S...