pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27784 · v1 · pith:PUSCDV7Gnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.LG

Improving Adversarial Robustness via Activation Amplification and Attenuation

Ta\"iga Gon\c{c}alves , Yongsong Huang , Tomo Miyazaki , Shinichiro Omachi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords adversarial robustnessactivation scalingcontrastive lossranking lossplug-in moduleneural network defense
0
0 comments X

The pith

Learning to amplify non-robust features via activation scaling improves robustness when the scaling is reversed for attenuation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces Activation Amplification and Attenuation (A3), a lightweight plug-in module that rescales activations with a learnable mask and a scaling factor derived from activation magnitudes. The same parameters amplify signals during training to build contrastive and ranking losses that degrade predictions, or attenuate them for inference simply by flipping the sign of the scaling. Experiments across backbones, datasets, and training methods show that this joint training boosts adversarial robustness while adding negligible overhead and few parameters. The method relies primarily on the scaling mechanism itself rather than added network capacity.

Core claim

The central claim is that training the scaling parameters in amplification mode to serve as negative references in contrastive and ranking losses simultaneously improves the effectiveness of those same parameters, when the sign is flipped, at attenuating adversarial perturbations during inference.

What carries the argument

The A3 module, which dynamically rescales activations using a learnable mask and magnitude-derived scaling factor, with the sign of the scaling operation flipped to switch between amplification for loss construction and attenuation for robust inference.

If this is right

  • Adversarial robustness improves consistently when A3 is integrated into different network backbones.
  • The approach maintains clean accuracy while gaining robustness.
  • Only a small number of additional parameters are required.
  • The module adds negligible computational and memory cost compared with existing plug-in defenses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The contrastive losses built from amplified signals may provide a direct way to target non-robust features without explicit pruning or masking.
  • The sign-flip reuse pattern could be tested on other perturbation-sensitive components inside networks.
  • Further experiments could check whether amplification-mode training helps against non-adversarial distribution shifts.

Load-bearing premise

That the same learnable parameters can be reused for both amplification and attenuation by flipping the sign without creating optimization conflicts or harming clean-data performance.

What would settle it

Training A3 in amplification mode and then measuring whether attenuation-mode robustness metrics on standard adversarial benchmarks remain no better than a baseline network without A3.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27784 by Shinichiro Omachi, Ta\"iga Gon\c{c}alves, Tomo Miyazaki, Yongsong Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Grad-CAM attention maps [26] on adversarial examples. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the proposed A3 module. A3 is a plug-in module that can be integrated into various models. The activations z are processed using a small learnable projection Wm and a Gumbel-Softmax Mask(·) operator to produce a channel-wise mask. The resulting mask and activation magnitudes are then passed to Scale(·) to compute a rescaling factor used to either amplify (+) or attenuate (−) the activations dep… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ablation study on hyperparameters. We analyze the effect of different hy￾perparameters in our A3 module on the adversarial robustness against various attacks. We use ResNet-18 trained with AT on CIFAR-10 as the backbone. The ’*’ indicates the default value used in all other experiments. We also evaluated a hard suppression strategy by completely masking the ac￾tivations using either m or 1−m. Our results i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of the activations under different modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of the scaling intensity. We adjust the intensity of the scaling oper￾ation in Eq. (17) with a constant: (a) αamp for the amplification mode and (b) αatt for the attenuation mode. All other experiments use αamp = αatt = 1 (marked by ’*’). late the intensity of the amplification and attenuation operations in Eq. (9) as follows: \label {eq:zatt_zamp_alpha} z_{\text {att}} = z \cdot \alpha _\text {att}… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of attack strength on model robustness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detailed comparison of AutoAttack results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The existence of adversarial attacks is often attributed to the presence of non-robust features in neural networks. While prior defenses reduce their impact via pruning, masking, or feature recalibration, we instead propose to jointly learn to amplify and attenuate these signals through a simple activation scaling mechanism. To this end, we introduce Activation Amplification and Attenuation (A3), a lightweight plug-in module that enhances adversarial robustness with minimal modifications of the activations. A3 dynamically rescales the activations using a learnable mask and a scaling factor derived from the original activation magnitudes. The influence of adversarial perturbations can be amplified or attenuated using the same learnable parameters by simply flipping the sign of the scaling operation. The amplified signals serve as negative references to construct novel contrastive and ranking loss functions. Experimental analysis shows that learning to degrade the predictions in amplification mode simultaneously improves adversarial robustness in attenuation mode. Moreover, A3 relies on only a small number of learnable parameters, with most of its behavior being determined by the scaling mechanism rather than additional network capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that integrating A3 into different backbones, datasets, and training methods consistently improves adversarial robustness while introducing negligible computational and memory overhead compared to existing plug-in modules. Code is available at: https://github.com/tgoncalv/A3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Activation Amplification and Attenuation (A3), a lightweight plug-in module that introduces a learnable mask and scaling factor derived from activation magnitudes. During training, the module amplifies non-robust signals to serve as negatives in novel contrastive and ranking losses; at inference the same parameters are reused for attenuation by flipping the sign of the scaling operation. The central claim is that this joint procedure yields consistent adversarial robustness gains across backbones, datasets, and training regimes while adding negligible overhead, with most behavior determined by the scaling mechanism rather than extra capacity.

Significance. If the sign-flip transfer holds without optimization conflicts or clean-accuracy degradation, A3 would supply a simple, low-parameter defense that exploits the same learned mask for both degradation and protection. The code release supports reproducibility. The approach is internally consistent as an empirical procedure but its load-bearing assumption—that parameters optimized to degrade predictions under amplification remain effective under sign-flipped attenuation—requires explicit verification to establish broader utility.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (A3 module and loss construction): the claim that the same learnable mask and scaling factor can be reused for attenuation simply by sign flip is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text provides no gradient-conflict analysis, loss-landscape visualization, or ablation that trains the mask exclusively under attenuation versus the joint amplification procedure. Without such evidence the reported robustness gains cannot be attributed to the sign-flip reuse rather than incidental regularization.
  2. [§4] §4 (main experimental tables and ablations): the abstract states that amplification training “simultaneously improves” attenuation performance, but the reported tables do not isolate the transfer effect (e.g., a row comparing joint training against an attenuation-only baseline using the identical mask parameterization). This omission directly affects whether the cross-mode claim is supported by the data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the scaling factor and mask should be introduced once with explicit dimensions and initialization details; repeated re-definition across subsections reduces clarity.
  2. [§4] Figure captions for activation visualizations should state the exact backbone, layer, and attack strength used so readers can reproduce the qualitative observations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback highlighting the need for stronger verification of the sign-flip transfer in A3. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (A3 module and loss construction): the claim that the same learnable mask and scaling factor can be reused for attenuation simply by sign flip is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text provides no gradient-conflict analysis, loss-landscape visualization, or ablation that trains the mask exclusively under attenuation versus the joint amplification procedure. Without such evidence the reported robustness gains cannot be attributed to the sign-flip reuse rather than incidental regularization.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks an explicit gradient-conflict analysis, loss-landscape visualization, or ablation training the mask exclusively under attenuation. The reported gains are observed when the jointly optimized parameters are deployed in attenuation mode, but without the requested controls it is difficult to fully attribute them to the sign-flip reuse. In revision we will add an ablation that trains an identical mask parameterization solely in attenuation mode and compares it directly to the joint procedure; we will also include a brief gradient-conflict discussion based on the observed training dynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (main experimental tables and ablations): the abstract states that amplification training “simultaneously improves” attenuation performance, but the reported tables do not isolate the transfer effect (e.g., a row comparing joint training against an attenuation-only baseline using the identical mask parameterization). This omission directly affects whether the cross-mode claim is supported by the data.

    Authors: The existing tables report results only for the joint training regime. We concur that an attenuation-only baseline with the same mask parameterization is required to isolate the transfer effect. In the revised version we will insert this baseline comparison into the main experimental tables and ablations to directly support the claim that amplification training simultaneously improves attenuation performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical training procedure with independent experimental validation.

full rationale

The paper introduces a plug-in module with learnable parameters trained via novel contrastive and ranking losses on amplified activations, then evaluates robustness gains under sign-flipped attenuation at inference. The central claim rests on experimental results across backbones and datasets rather than any derivation that reduces reported robustness improvements to quantities defined solely by the fitted parameters or by self-citation. No equations are shown that equate predictions to inputs by construction, and the method is framed as data-driven optimization without load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. This is the expected non-finding for an empirical defense paper whose performance claims are externally falsifiable via the released code.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; the central claim rests on the introduction of learnable scaling parameters whose training dynamics are asserted to transfer robustness between modes.

free parameters (2)
  • learnable mask
    Parameters that dynamically rescale activations, fitted during training on the target task.
  • scaling factor
    Magnitude-derived factor whose sign is flipped between modes, with learnable components.
invented entities (1)
  • A3 module no independent evidence
    purpose: Lightweight plug-in for joint amplification and attenuation of activations
    New component introduced to implement the proposed scaling mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1215 out tokens · 34640 ms · 2026-06-29T04:59:25.739379+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In: International Con- ference on Machine Learning

    Athalye, A., Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples. In: International Con- ference on Machine Learning. pp. 274–283. PMLR (2018),https://proceedings. mlr.press/v80/athalye18a.html

    2018

  2. [2]

    In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2021),https://openreview.net/forum?id= zQTezqCCtNx 16 Gonçalves et al

    Bai, Y., Zeng, Y., Jiang, Y., Xia, S.T., Ma, X., Wang, Y.: Improving Adversar- ial Robustness via Channel-wise Activation Suppressing. In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2021),https://openreview.net/forum?id= zQTezqCCtNx 16 Gonçalves et al

    2021

  3. [3]

    Peebles and S

    Bu, Q., Huang, D., Cui, H.: Towards Building More Robust Models with Frequency Bias. In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 4379–4388 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00406

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00406 2023

  4. [4]

    Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks

    Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. pp. 39–57 (2017).https://doi. org/10.1109/SP.2017.49

    work page doi:10.1109/sp.2017.49 2017

  5. [5]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=SSKZPJCt7B

    Croce, F., Andriushchenko, M., Sehwag, V., Debenedetti, E., Flammarion, N., Chiang, M., Mittal, P., Hein, M.: RobustBench: A standardized adversarial robust- ness benchmark. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=SSKZPJCt7B

    2021

  6. [6]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Croce, F., Hein, M.: Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensem- ble of diverse parameter-free attacks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 2206–2216. PMLR (2020),https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/ croce20b.html

    2020

  7. [7]

    ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Deng,J.,Dong,W.,Socher,R.,Li,L.J.,Li,K.,Fei-Fei,L.:ImageNet:ALarge-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 248–255 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009. 5206848

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009 2009

  8. [8]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https: //openreview.net/forum?id=H1uR4GZRZ

    Dhillon,G.S.,Azizzadenesheli,K.,Lipton,Z.C.,Bernstein,J.,Kossaifi,J.,Khanna, A., Anandkumar, A.: Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial De- fense. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https: //openreview.net/forum?id=H1uR4GZRZ

    2018

  9. [9]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023),https://openreview.net/forum?id=ndYXTEL6cZz

    Djurisic, A., Bozanic, N., Ashok, A., Liu, R.: Extremely Simple Activation Shap- ing for Out-of-Distribution Detection. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023),https://openreview.net/forum?id=ndYXTEL6cZz

    2023

  10. [10]

    Machine Vision and Applications36(5), 108 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00138-025-01730-8

    Djurisic, A., Liu, R., Nikolic, M.: Logit scaling for out-of-distribution detection. Machine Vision and Applications36(5), 108 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00138-025-01730-8

    2025

  11. [11]

    Neural Networks194, 108176 (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108176

    Gao, Z., Liu, C., Shi, Y., Guo, X., Xu, J., Zhang, H., Shi, L.: FTA2C: Achieving Su- perior Trade-off between Accuracy and Robustness in Adversarial Training. Neural Networks194, 108176 (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108176

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108176 2026

  12. [12]

    Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples

    Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and Harnessing Adversar- ial Examples. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    A Series of Lectures

    Gumbel, E.J.: Statistical Theory of Extreme Values and Some Practical Applica- tions. A Series of Lectures. Tech. Rep. PB175818, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. Applied Mathematics Div. (1954),https://ntrl.ntis.gov/ NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB175818.xhtml

    1954

  14. [14]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q.: On Calibration of Modern Neu- ral Networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 1321–1330. PMLR (2017),https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html

    2017

  15. [15]

    2016, in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 770– 778 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 2016

  16. [16]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2017),https : / / openreview.net/forum?id=rkE3y85ee

    Jang, E., Gu, S., Poole, B.: Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2017),https : / / openreview.net/forum?id=rkE3y85ee

    2017

  17. [17]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022

    Jia, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, B., Ma, K., Wang, J., Cao, X.: LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategy. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 13388–13398 (2022).https://doi.org/10. 1109/CVPR52688.2022.01304 A3: Activation Amplification and Attenuation 17

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Kim, W.J., Cho, Y., Jung, J., Yoon, S.E.: Feature Separation and Recalibration for Adversarial Robustness. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition. pp. 8183–8192 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729. 2023.00791

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52729 2023

  19. [19]

    Techni- cal Report, University of Toronto (2009),https://cave.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/ learning-features-2009-TR.pdf

    Krizhevsky, A.: Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images. Techni- cal Report, University of Toronto (2009),https://cave.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/ learning-features-2009-TR.pdf

    2009

  20. [20]

    In: Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems

    Lee, K., Lee, K., Lee, H., Shin, J.: A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out- of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attacks. In: Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems. vol. 31. Curran Associates, Inc. (2018),https://papers. nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/hash/abdeb6f575ac5c6676b747bca8d09cc2- Abstract.html

    2018

  21. [21]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Li, Z., Yu, D., Wei, L., Jin, C., Zhang, Y., Chan, S.: Soften to Defend: Towards Adversarial Robustness via Self-Guided Label Refinement. In: IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 24776–24785 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02340

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02340 2024

  22. [22]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1VGkIxRZ

    Liang, S., Li, Y., Srikant, R.: Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1VGkIxRZ

    2018

  23. [23]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    Liu, W., Wang, X., Owens, J.D., Li, Y.: Energy-based Out-of-distribution De- tection. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 33, pp. 21464–21475 (2020),https : / / proceedings . neurips . cc / paper / 2020 / hash / f5496252609c43eb8a3d147ab9b9c006-Abstract.html

    2020

  24. [24]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJzIBfZAb

    Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards Deep Learn- ing Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018),https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJzIBfZAb

    2018

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08023 (2025)

    Regmi, S.: AdaSCALE: Adaptive Scaling for OOD Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08023 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Int J Comput Vis128(2), 336–359 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263- 019-01228-7

    Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad- CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization. Int J Comput Vis128(2), 336–359 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263- 019-01228-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11263- 2017

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference onMultimedia.pp

    Tong, H., Zhang, X., Jin, Y., Lou, J., Wu, K., Chen, X.: Balancing Generalization andRobustnessinAdversarialTrainingviaSteeringthroughCleanandAdversarial Gradient Directions. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference onMultimedia.pp. 1014–1023. ACM (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3664647. 3680963

    work page doi:10.1145/3664647 2024

  28. [28]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    Tramèr, F., Carlini, N., Brendel, W., Madry, A.: On Adaptive Attacks to Adver- sarial Example Defenses. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 33, pp. 1633–1645 (2020),https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/ hash/11f38f8ecd71867b42433548d1078e38-Abstract.html

    2020

  29. [29]

    In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2020),https://openreview.net/forum?id= rklOg6EFwS

    Wang, Y., Zou, D., Yi, J., Bailey, J., Ma, X., Gu, Q.: Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified Examples. In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2020),https://openreview.net/forum?id= rklOg6EFwS

    2020

  30. [30]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(10), 8923–8937 (2025).https:// doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3582518 18 Gonçalves et al

    Wang, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, L., Bin, Y., Wang, G., Yang, Y., Shen, H.T.: Evidence- Based Multi-Feature Fusion for Adversarial Robustness. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(10), 8923–8937 (2025).https:// doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3582518 18 Gonçalves et al

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3582518 2025

  31. [31]

    In: International Conferenceon LearningRepresentations(2025),https://openreview.net/forum? id=M9SKazbVkJ

    Waseda, F., Chang, C.C., Echizen, I.: Rethinking Invariance Regularization in Adversarial Training to Improve Robustness-Accuracy Trade-off. In: International Conferenceon LearningRepresentations(2025),https://openreview.net/forum? id=M9SKazbVkJ

    2025

  32. [32]

    In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Wei, Z., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, Y.: CFA: Class-Wise Calibrated Fair Adversar- ial Training. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition. pp. 8193–8201 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00792

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00792 2023

  33. [33]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020),https: //openreview.net/forum?id=Pr86Lt1nOU

    Xiao, C., Zhong, P., Zheng, C.: Enhancing Adversarial Defense by k-Winners- Take-All. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020),https: //openreview.net/forum?id=Pr86Lt1nOU

    2020

  34. [34]

    Feature denoising for improving adversarial robustness, in: 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Xie, C., Wu, Y.: Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustness. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 501– 509 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00059

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00059 2019

  35. [35]

    In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2024),https://openreview.net/forum?id= RDSTjtnqCg

    Xu, K., Chen, R., Franchi, G., Yao, A.: Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection Enhancement. In: International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (2024),https://openreview.net/forum?id= RDSTjtnqCg

    2024

  36. [36]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Yan, H., Zhang, J., Niu, G., Feng, J., Tan, V.Y.F., Sugiyama, M.: CIFS: Improv- ing Adversarial Robustness of CNNs via Channel-wise Importance-based Feature Selection. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 11693–11703. PMLR (2021),https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/yan21e.html

    2021

  37. [37]

    Zagoruyko,S.,Komodakis,N.:WideResidualNetworks.In:BritishMachineVision Conference. pp. 87.1–87.12. British Machine Vision Association (2016).https: //doi.org/10.5244/C.30.87

    work page doi:10.5244/c.30.87 2016

  38. [38]

    In: International Confer- ence on Machine Learning

    Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Jiao, J., Xing, E.P., Ghaoui, L.E., Jordan, M.I.: Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy. In: International Confer- ence on Machine Learning. pp. 7472–7482. PMLR (2019),https://proceedings. mlr.press/v97/zhang19p.html

    2019

  39. [39]

    Peebles and S

    Zhu, K., Wang, J., Hu, X., Xie, X., Yang, G.: Improving Generalization of Ad- versarial Training via Robust Critical Fine-Tuning. In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 4401–4411 (2023).https://doi.org/10. 1109/ICCV51070.2023.00408 A3: Activation Amplification and Attenuation 19 A Additional Results In this section, we provide addit...

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    As expected, the robust accuracy decreases when increasing eitherϵor the number of iterations (i.e., when increasing the attack strength). Importantly, the gap between the two curves remains consistent across attack strengths, indicating that A3 provides stable robustness improvements rather than gains limited to specific settings. This behavior provides ...