pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29106 · v1 · pith:JLZ6OQHOnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

A Deep Multiscale Neural Network for Accurate Neurological Disorder Detection from MRI Scans and Real-Time Web Deployment

Ali Fatahi , Hoda Zamani , Mohammad H. Nadimi-Shahraki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 09:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords deep learningMRI classificationneurological disordersinception modulesmultiscale featuresclass imbalanceWGAN-GPweb deployment
0
0 comments X

The pith

End-Net, a 24-layer CNN built around 21 optimized inception modules, classifies MRI scans into Alzheimer's, brain tumors, multiple sclerosis or healthy controls with higher accuracy than prior models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents End-Net as a multiscale convolutional network that processes MRI images through parallel branches of 1x1, 3x3 and factorized 5x5 convolutions inside each inception module to capture texture, edge, shape and context at once. It addresses severe class imbalance in the four-class neurological disorder dataset by generating additional minority-class examples with WGAN-GP and by undersampling the majority class. The resulting model is reported to exceed the accuracy and generalization of existing architectures on this task while using global average pooling and dropout to keep parameter count low. The same network is then placed behind a web interface that performs real-time inference on new scans.

Core claim

End-Net, which stacks convolutional blocks followed by 21 optimized inception modules that run parallel multiscale convolutions together with max pooling, followed by global average pooling and a compact classifier with dropout, outperforms existing architectures in both accuracy and generalization on the Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset after WGAN-GP augmentation and undersampling.

What carries the argument

The 21 optimized inception modules that extract complementary multiscale features through parallel 1x1, 3x3 and factorized 5x5 convolutional branches plus max pooling.

If this is right

  • A single network can distinguish subtle anatomical differences across four neurological conditions instead of requiring separate binary classifiers.
  • WGAN-GP augmentation paired with undersampling mitigates class imbalance sufficiently for stable multi-class training on MRI data.
  • Global average pooling and dropout after the inception stack reduce parameter count and overfitting risk while preserving multiscale feature use.
  • Placing the trained model behind a web interface makes real-time inference accessible without local GPU hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multiscale-inception design could be tested on other imbalanced medical imaging tasks such as chest X-ray or histopathology classification.
  • Web deployment raises the practical question of how latency and privacy constraints affect clinical adoption of such models.
  • Performance on the reported dataset leaves open whether the architecture remains superior when scanner protocols or patient demographics shift.

Load-bearing premise

The Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset after WGAN-GP augmentation and undersampling produces training and test distributions that match the variability of real clinical MRI scans without introducing artifacts that inflate measured performance.

What would settle it

A new test set of MRI scans collected from different hospitals or scanner models on which End-Net accuracy falls substantially below the levels reported on the augmented dataset.

read the original abstract

Neurological disorders involve diverse pathologies of the brain and nervous system, making early and accurate detection essential. While many deep CNNs have been developed for MRI-based classification of neurological disorders, most are optimized for binary tasks and often fail to capture the multi-class features needed to distinguish subtle anatomical differences across conditions. This study proposes the Enhanced Neurological Disorder Detection Network (End-Net) for multi-class MRI classification of neurological disorders. End-Net includes 24 convolutional layers, beginning with convolutional blocks followed by 21 optimized inception modules. These modules extract multiscale features via parallel 1 x 1, 3 x 3, and factorized 5 x 5 convolutional branches, along with max pooling, enabling the model to capture complementary texture, edge, shape, and contextual information. A global average pooling head, compact fully connected classifier, and dropout reduce parameters, limit overfitting, and improve robustness. End-Net was evaluated on the Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset, comprising MRI scans from patients with Alzheimer's disease, brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. Severe class imbalance was addressed by augmenting minority classes with WGAN-GP and randomly undersampling the majority class. The results show that End-Net outperforms existing architectures in both accuracy and generalization. The model is also integrated into an online system for real-time web-based inference and accessibility.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Enhanced Neurological Disorder Detection Network (End-Net), a 24-layer CNN incorporating 21 inception modules with parallel 1x1, 3x3, and factorized 5x5 branches for multiscale feature extraction from MRI scans. It targets four-class classification (Alzheimer's, brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, healthy controls) on the Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset, using WGAN-GP augmentation for minority classes and undersampling for the majority class to address imbalance. The paper asserts that End-Net outperforms prior architectures in accuracy and generalization and describes its integration into a real-time web deployment system.

Significance. If the outperformance claims hold under rigorous validation, the work could support practical multi-class neurological diagnosis tools with web accessibility. The inception-based multiscale design is a reasonable choice for capturing complementary texture and contextual MRI features, and the deployment component addresses real-world usability. However, the absence of reported metrics or augmentation validation limits assessment of whether the contribution advances the field beyond standard CNN applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'End-Net outperforms existing architectures in both accuracy and generalization' is presented without any accuracy values, confusion matrices, baseline comparisons, or statistical tests, leaving the primary result unsupported by evidence in the provided text.
  2. [Methods (dataset and augmentation)] Dataset and augmentation description: No quantitative checks (FID, expert visual Turing test, or distribution-shift metrics) are reported for the WGAN-GP synthetic samples to verify they remain within the real clinical MRI manifold; without this, the reported outperformance on the augmented Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset cannot be distinguished from artifact-driven bias.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The source, size, and public availability of the 'Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset' should be explicitly cited or linked to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'End-Net outperforms existing architectures in both accuracy and generalization' is presented without any accuracy values, confusion matrices, baseline comparisons, or statistical tests, leaving the primary result unsupported by evidence in the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should provide more quantitative support for the central claim. The full manuscript contains detailed results including accuracy values, confusion matrices, baseline comparisons, and statistical tests in the experimental section. We have revised the abstract to incorporate key quantitative results and references to these comparisons from the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (dataset and augmentation)] Dataset and augmentation description: No quantitative checks (FID, expert visual Turing test, or distribution-shift metrics) are reported for the WGAN-GP synthetic samples to verify they remain within the real clinical MRI manifold; without this, the reported outperformance on the augmented Multi-Class Neurological Disorder dataset cannot be distinguished from artifact-driven bias.

    Authors: We thank the referee for raising this important point. To clarify, the WGAN-GP was used solely for augmenting the training data to mitigate class imbalance. The evaluation of End-Net, including all accuracy and generalization claims, was performed on a completely held-out test set of real MRI scans. No synthetic samples were included in the test set. We have added explicit clarification in the methods section to emphasize that the reported results reflect performance on real clinical data. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in claimed results or architecture

full rationale

The paper is an empirical ML architecture proposal evaluated on a curated dataset with standard WGAN-GP augmentation and undersampling. No mathematical derivation, first-principles result, or prediction is presented that reduces to its inputs by construction. No self-citations, self-definitional steps, or fitted parameters renamed as predictions appear in the abstract or described content. Performance claims are standard empirical reporting rather than a derivation chain, so the patterns for circularity do not apply.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an empirical deep-learning study with no mathematical derivation or first-principles model; all performance claims rest on dataset-specific training and augmentation choices whose details are not supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • network hyperparameters and augmentation parameters
    Number of inception modules, filter sizes, learning rate, WGAN-GP training settings, and undersampling ratio are chosen or fitted to produce the reported accuracy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5781 in / 1184 out tokens · 27859 ms · 2026-06-30T09:10:08.668821+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mukherjee, S

    S. Mukherjee, S. Ali, S. Hashmi, S. Jahan, History, Origin and Types of Neurological Disorders, Applications of Stem Cells and derived Exosomes in Neurodegenerative Disorders, Springer2023, pp. 1– 32

  2. [2]

    Ilyas, A

    U. Ilyas, A. Khanum, K. Fatima, Long term effects of childhood trauma and abuse: Narrative on functional neurological disorder, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 74 (2024) 1130– 1135. https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.10083

    work page doi:10.47391/jpma.10083 2024

  3. [3]

    Mahaley, C

    M.S. Mahaley, C. Mettlin, N. Natarajan, E.R. Laws, B.B. Peace, National survey of patterns of care for brain - tumor patients, Journal of neurosurgery, 71 (1989) 826–836. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0826

    work page doi:10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0826 1989

  4. [4]

    Khalil, E.M

    H.F.h. Khalil, E.M. Mahmoud, A. Mahrous, H.F.A. Hamed, CNN-MR tumor classifier: Brain tumors classification system based on CNN transfer learning models combined with distributed computing process, Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends, 43 (2024) 399–423. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jaet.2024.237567.1259

    work page doi:10.21608/jaet.2024.237567.1259 2024

  5. [5]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y . Bengio, A. Courville, Y . Bengio, Deep learning, MIT press Cambridge, 2016

    2016

  6. [6]

    Onciul, C

    R. Onciul, C. -I. Tataru, A.V . Dumitru, C. Crivoi, M. Serban, R.- A. Covache -Busuioc, M.P. Radoi, C. Toader, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14 (2025) 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020550

    work page doi:10.3390/jcm14020550 2025

  7. [7]

    Tandel, A

    G.S. Tandel, A. Tiwari, O.G. Kakde, Multi-Class Brain Tumor Grades Classification Using a Deep Learning-Based Majority V oting Algorithm and Its Validation Using Explainable -AI, Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, (2025) 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01368-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01368-4 2025

  8. [8]

    H. Abbasi, Transfer Learning and Advanced CNN Models for Detecting Brain Tumors using MRI, International Journal of Scientific and Applied Research (IJSAR), eISSN: 2583- 0279, 4 (2024) 92– 103. https://doi.org/10.54756/IJSAR.2024.24

    work page doi:10.54756/ijsar.2024.24 2024

  9. [9]

    Tomassini, D

    S. Tomassini, D. Duranti, A. Zeggada, C.C. Quattrocchi, F. Melgani, P. Giorgini, Multi-Branch CNN-LSTM Fusion Network-Driven System with BERT Semantic Evaluator for Radiology Reporting in Emergency Head CTs, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3535676

    work page doi:10.1109/jtehm.2025.3535676 2025

  10. [10]

    Williams, D

    S.C. Williams, D. Duvaux, A. Das, S. Sinha, H.L. Horsfall, J.P. Funnell, J.G. Hanrahan, D.Z. Khan, W.R. Muirhead, N. Kitchen, Automated Operative Workflow Recognition in Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: Development and Preclinical Evaluation of a Deep Learning Neural Network (Ideal Stage 0), Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, 86 (2025) P4...

    work page doi:10.1055/s-0045-1803952 2025

  11. [11]

    Y . Liu, E. Ge, M. He, Z. Liu, S. Zhao, X. Hu, N. Qiang, D. Zhu, T. Liu, B. Ge, Mapping dynamic spatial patterns of brain function with spatial- wise attention, Journal of Neural Engineering, 21 (2024) 026005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad2cea

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad2cea 2024

  12. [12]

    Al -Ghanimi, A.H

    H.H. Al -Ghanimi, A.H. Al -Ghanimi, Deep Learning -Driven Medical Image Segmentation Using Generative Adversarial Networks and Conditional Neural Networks, Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, 30 (2025) 287–300. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.300125

    work page doi:10.18280/isi.300125 2025

  13. [13]

    Berghout, The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection, Journal of Imaging, 11 (2024) 2

    T. Berghout, The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection, Journal of Imaging, 11 (2024) 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11010002

    work page doi:10.3390/jimaging11010002 2024

  14. [14]

    Anand, S

    S.S. Anand, S. Kini, Hybrid transformer-cnn models for enhanced autism spectrum disorder classification using clinical and neuroimaging data, Ictact journal on image & video processing, 15 (2024). http://doi.org/10.21917/ijivp.2024.0481

    work page doi:10.21917/ijivp.2024.0481 2024

  15. [15]

    Iratni, A

    M. Iratni, A. Abdullah, M. Aldhaheri, O. Elharrouss, A. Abd- Alrazaq, Z. Rustamov, N. Zaki, R. Damseh, Transformers for neuroimage segmentation: scoping review, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27 (2025) e57723. https://doi.org/10.2196/57723

    work page doi:10.2196/57723 2025

  16. [16]

    M.K. Sain, R. Laskar, J. Singha, S. Saini, Patient activity recognition for robust performance under varied illumination and cluttered background in indoor environment, International Journal of Computers and Applications, 46 (2024) 1219–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2024.2427287

    work page doi:10.1080/1206212x.2024.2427287 2024

  17. [17]

    Wulandari, J

    M. Wulandari, J. Fat, Optimizer comparison in convolutional neural network for real time face recognition, Engineering, MAthematics and Computer Science Journal (EMACS), 7 (2025) 17– 26. https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v7i1.12058

    work page doi:10.21512/emacsjournal.v7i1.12058 2025

  18. [18]

    Mahdi, S.M

    E.T. Mahdi, S.M. Al -Barzinji, W.K. Awad, Object detection using capsule neural network: An overview, Babylonian Journal of Machine Learning, 2024 (2024) 157–164. https://doi.org/10.58496/BJML/2024/016

    work page doi:10.58496/bjml/2024/016 2024

  19. [19]

    Sheela, G

    M.S. Sheela, G. Amirthayogam, J.J. Hephzipah, R. Suganthi, T. Karthikeyan, M. Gopianand, Advanced brain tumor classification using DEEPBELEIF -CNN method, Babylonian Journal of Machine Learning, 2024 (2024) 89–

    2024

  20. [20]

    https://doi.org/10.58496/BJML/2024/009

    work page doi:10.58496/bjml/2024/009 2024

  21. [21]

    Krizhevsky, I

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Advances in neural information processing systems, 25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386

    work page doi:10.1145/3065386 2012

  22. [22]

    Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition

    K. Simonyan, Very deep convolutional networks for large -scale image recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, (2014). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 2014

  23. [23]

    Szegedy, W

    C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y . Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V . Vanhoucke, A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015. pp. 1–9

    2015

  24. [24]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016. pp. 770–778

    2016

  25. [25]

    Ronneberger, P

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U -net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18, 2015. pp. 234–241

    2015

  26. [26]

    Huang, Z

    G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, K.Q. Weinberger, Densely connected convolutional networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017. pp. 4700 –4708

    2017

  27. [27]

    Haque, M.M

    R. Haque, M.M. Hassan, A.K. Bairagi, S.M. Shariful Islam, NeuroNet19: an explainable deep neural network model for the classification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging data, Scientific Reports, 14 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51867-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51867-1

  29. [29]

    M. Tan, Q. Le, Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks, in: International conference on machine learning, 2019. pp. 6105–6114

    2019

  30. [30]

    Onakpojeruo, M.T

    E.P. Onakpojeruo, M.T. Mustapha, D.U. Ozsahin, I. Ozsahin, A comparative analysis of the novel conditional deep convolutional neural network model, using conditional deep convolutional generative adversarial network- generated synthetic and augmented brain tumor datasets for image classification, Brain Sciences, 14 (2024) 559

    2024

  31. [31]

    Nair, G.E

    V . Nair, G.E. Hinton, Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines, in: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), 2010. pp. 807–814

    2010

  32. [32]

    Panting, Z

    N. Panting, Z. Baolin, P. Lijie, G. Jianpeng, Identification and explainability of maize leaf diseases based on improved GoogLeNet# br, Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 46 (2025) 204. https://doi.org/10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2025.01.031

    work page doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2025.01.031 2025

  33. [33]

    Ummapure, R

    S.B. Ummapure, R. Tilekar, S. Mallappa, Skin Cancer Classification using VGG-16 and Googlenet CNN Models, International Journal of Computer Applications, 975 8887. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2023922497

    work page doi:10.5120/ijca2023922497

  34. [34]

    Ashani, I.S.C

    Z.N. Ashani, I.S.C. Ilias, K.Y . Ng, M. Ariffin, A. Jarno, N.Z. Zamri, Comparative analysis of deepfake image detection method using vgg16, vgg19 and resnet50, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 47 (2024) 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.37934/araset.47.1.1628

    work page doi:10.37934/araset.47.1.1628 2024

  35. [35]

    Szegedy, V

    C. Szegedy, V . Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, Z. Wojna, Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016. pp. 2818 –2826

    2016

  36. [36]

    Zamani, Z

    H. Zamani, Z. Asghari Varzaneh, M.H. Nadimi-Shahraki, Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in Neurological Disorders Diagnosis: Comprehensive Review of Cutting- Edge Architectures, Challenges, and Future Directions, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, (2025) 1–83

    2025

  37. [37]

    Asaduzzaman, M.K

    M. Asaduzzaman, M.K. Alom, M.E. Karim, ALZENET: Deep Learning -Based Early Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease through Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis, Telematics and Informatics Reports, (2025) 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189

    work page doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189 2025

  38. [38]

    H. Yan, V . Mubonanyikuzo, T.E. Komolafe, L. Zhou, T. Wu, N. Wang, Hybrid-RViT: Hybridizing ResNet-50 and Vision Transformer for Enhanced Alzheimer’s disease detection, PloS one, 20 (2025) e0318998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318998

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318998 2025

  39. [39]

    Iqbal, M.B.B

    M.S. Iqbal, M.B.B. Heyat, S. Parveen, M.A.B. Hayat, M. Roshanzamir, R. Alizadehsani, F. Akhtar, E. Sayeed, S. Hussain, H.S. Hussein, Progress and Trends in Neurological Disorders Research Based on Deep Learning, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, (2024) 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102400

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102400 2024

  40. [40]

    L. Chugh, Addressing Data Scarcity and Class Imbalance in Alzheimer’s Using WGANs -GP, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK paper link: https://www.ijert.org/thesis-volume-12-2023, Northumbria University, 2023

    2023

  41. [41]

    El-Latif, S.A

    A.A.A. El-Latif, S.A. Chelloug, M. Alabdulhafith, M. Hammad, Accurate detection of Alzheimer’s disease using lightweight deep learning model on MRI data, Diagnostics, 13 (2023) 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071216

    work page doi:10.3390/diagnostics13071216 2023

  42. [42]

    Dubois, A

    B. Dubois, A. Padovani, P. Scheltens, A. Rossi, G. Dell’Agnello, A. Saykin, Timely Diagnosis for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Literature Review on Benefits and Challenges, Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 49 (2016) 617 –631. 10.3233/jad-150692

    work page doi:10.3233/jad-150692 2016

  43. [43]

    Khojaste-Sarakhsi, S.S

    M. Khojaste-Sarakhsi, S.S. Haghighi, S.F. Ghomi, E. Marchiori, Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A survey, Artificial intelligence in medicine, 130 (2022) 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102332

    work page doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102332 2022

  44. [44]

    Janghel, Y

    R. Janghel, Y . Rathore, Deep convolution neural network based system for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, Irbm, 42 (2021) 258–267

    2021

  45. [45]

    Petersen, P.S

    R.C. Petersen, P.S. Aisen, L.A. Beckett, M.C. Donohue, A.C. Gamst, D.J. Harvey, C. Jack Jr, W.J. Jagust, L.M. Shaw, A.W. Toga, Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) clinical characterization, Neurology, 74 (2010) 201–209

    2010

  46. [46]

    Marwa, H.E.-D

    E.-G. Marwa, H.E.-D. Moustafa, F. Khalifa, H. Khater, E. AbdElhalim, An MRI -based deep learning approach for accurate detection of Alzheimer’s disease, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 63 (2023) 211– 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.062

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.062 2023

  47. [47]

    Marcus, T.H

    D.S. Marcus, T.H. Wang, J. Parker, J.G. Csernansky, J.C. Morris, R.L. Buckner, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults, Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19 (2007) 1498–1507

    2007

  48. [48]

    Houria, N

    L. Houria, N. Belkhamsa, A. Cherfa, Y . Cherfa, Multi-modality MRI for Alzheimer’s disease detection using deep learning, Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 45 (2022) 1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022- 01165-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s13246-022- 2022

  49. [49]

    Basaia, F

    S. Basaia, F. Agosta, L. Wagner, E. Canu, G. Magnani, R. Santangelo, M. Filippi, A.s.D.N. Initiative, Automated classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using a single MRI and deep neural networks, NeuroImage: Clinical, 21 (2019) 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101645

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101645 2019

  50. [50]

    Venugopalan, L

    J. Venugopalan, L. Tong, H.R. Hassanzadeh, M.D. Wang, Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease stage, Scientific reports, 11 (2021) 3254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w 2021

  51. [51]

    Spasov, L

    S. Spasov, L. Passamonti, A. Duggento, P. Lio, N. Toschi, A.s.D.N. Initiative, A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease, Neuroimage, 189 (2019) 276–

    2019

  52. [52]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031 2019

  53. [53]

    Shojaei, M.S

    S. Shojaei, M.S. Abadeh, Z. Momeni, An evolutionary explainable deep learning approach for Alzheimer's MRI classification, Expert systems with applications, 220 (2023) 119709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119709

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119709 2023

  54. [54]

    I. Ayus, D. Gupta, A novel hybrid ensemble based Alzheimer’s identification system using deep learning technique, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 92 (2024) 106079

    2024

  55. [55]

    Y uda, T

    E. Y uda, T. Ando, I. Kaneko, Y . Yoshida, D. Hirahara, Comprehensive data augmentation approach using WGAN- GP and UMAP for enhancing Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis, Electronics, 13 (2024) 3671

    2024

  56. [56]

    Shamrat, S

    F.J.M. Shamrat, S. Akter, S. Azam, A. Karim, P. Ghosh, Z. Tasnim, K.M. Hasib, F. De Boer, K. Ahmed, AlzheimerNet: An effective deep learning based proposition for alzheimer’s disease stages classification from functional brain changes in magnetic resonance images, IEEE Access, 11 (2023) 16376– 16395. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3244952

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2023.3244952 2023

  57. [57]

    Fareed, S

    M.M.S. Fareed, S. Zikria, G. Ahmed, S. Mahmood, M. Aslam, S.F. Jillani, A. Moustafa, M. Asad, ADD-Net: an effective deep learning model for early detection of Alzheimer disease in MRI scans, IEEE Access, 10 (2022) 96930– 96951. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3204395

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204395 2022

  58. [58]

    Murugan, C

    S. Murugan, C. Venkatesan, M. Sumithra, X. -Z. Gao, B. Elakkiya, M. Akila, S. Manoharan, DEMNET: A deep learning model for early diagnosis of Alzheimer diseases and dementia from MR images, Ieee Access, 9 (2021) 90319– 90329. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090474

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3090474 2021

  59. [59]

    Sarraf, A

    S. Sarraf, A. Sarraf, D.D. DeSouza, J.A. Anderson, M. Kabia, A.s.D.N. Initiative, OViTAD: Optimized vision transformer to predict various stages of Alzheimer’s disease using resting-state fMRI and structural MRI data, Brain sciences, 13 (2023) 260

    2023

  60. [60]

    Z. Yao, W. Mao, Y . Y uan, Z. Shi, G. Zhu, W. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Zhang, Fuzzy-VGG: A fast deep learning method for predicting the staging of Alzheimer's disease based on brain MRI, Information Sciences, 642 (2023) 119129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119129

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119129 2023

  61. [61]

    S. Li, H. Qu, X. Dong, B. Dang, H. Zang, Y . Gong, Leveraging deep learning and xception architecture for high- accuracy mri classification in alzheimer diagnosis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16212, (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.16212

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.16212 2024

  62. [62]

    Fathima, F

    A. Fathima, F. Taranum, M. Hijab, S.M.A. Hashmi, S.S. Ahmad, G. Gupta, Classifying Alzheimer Disease using VGG19, in: 2024 11th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom),

    2024

  63. [63]

    Sharma, T

    R. Sharma, T. Goel, M. Tanveer, R. Murugan, FDN-ADNet: Fuzzy LS-TWSVM based deep learning network for prognosis of the Alzheimer’s disease using the sagittal plane of MRI scans, Applied Soft Computing, 115 (2022) 108099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108099

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108099 2022

  64. [64]

    Tehsin, I.M

    S. Tehsin, I.M. Nasir, R. Damaševičius, GATransformer: A Graph Attention Network-Based Transformer Model to Generate Explainable Attentions for Brain Tumor Detection, Algorithms, 18 (2025) 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18020089

    work page doi:10.3390/a18020089 2025

  65. [65]

    Haq, J.P

    A.U. Haq, J.P. Li, R. Kumar, Z. Ali, I. Khan, M.I. Uddin, B.L.Y . Agbley, MCNN: a multi-level CNN model for the classification of brain tumors in IoT -healthcare system, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14 (2023) 4695–4706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04373-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s12652-022-04373-z 2023

  66. [66]

    Saeedi, S

    S. Saeedi, S. Rezayi, H. Keshavarz, S. R. Niakan Kalhori, MRI-based brain tumor detection using convolutional deep learning methods and chosen machine learning techniques, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23 (2023) 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02114-6

    work page doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02114-6 2023

  67. [67]

    Majib, M.M

    M.S. Majib, M.M. Rahman, T.S. Sazzad, N.I. Khan, S.K. Dey, Vgg -scnet: A vgg net -based deep learning framework for brain tumor detection on mri images, IEEE Access, 9 (2021) 116942– 116952. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105874

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3105874 2021

  68. [68]

    Anantharajan, S

    S. Anantharajan, S. Gunasekaran, T. Subramanian, R. Venkatesh, MRI brain tumor detection using deep learning and machine learning approaches, Measurement: Sensors, 31 (2024) 101026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.measen.2024.101026 2024

  69. [69]

    Aamir, Z

    M. Aamir, Z. Rahman, Z.A. Dayo, W.A. Abro, M.I. Uddin, I. Khan, A.S. Imran, Z. Ali, M. Ishfaq, Y . Guan, A deep learning approach for brain tumor classification using MRI images, Computers and Electrical Engineering, 101 (2022) 108105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108105

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108105 2022

  70. [70]

    Ottom, H.A

    M.A. Ottom, H.A. Rahman, I.D. Dinov, Znet: deep learning approach for 2D MRI brain tumor segmentation, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 10 (2022) 1– 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3176737

    work page doi:10.1109/jtehm.2022.3176737 2022

  71. [71]

    J. Amin, M. Sharif, M. Yasmin, S.L. Fernandes, Big data analysis for brain tumor detection: Deep convolutional neural networks, Future Generation Computer Systems, 87 (2018) 290– 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.04.065

    work page doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.04.065 2018

  72. [72]

    Onakpojeruo, M.T

    E.P. Onakpojeruo, M.T. Mustapha, D.U. Ozsahin, I. Ozsahin, Enhanced MRI -based brain tumour classification with a novel Pix2pix generative adversarial network augmentation framework, Brain Communications, 6 (2024) fcae372

    2024

  73. [73]

    Ullah, A

    N. Ullah, A. Javed, A. Alhazmi, S.M. Hasnain, A. Tahir, R. Ashraf, TumorDetNet: A unified deep learning model for brain tumor detection and classification, Plos one, 18 (2023) e0291200. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291200

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291200 2023

  74. [74]

    Islam, M.A

    M.M. Islam, M.A. Talukder, M.A. Uddin, A. Akhter, M. Khalid, Brainnet: Precision brain tumor classification with optimized efficientnet architecture, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2024 (2024) 3583612. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3583612

    work page doi:10.1155/2024/3583612 2024

  75. [75]

    Mahale, S

    C. Mahale, S. Meshram, A. Pakhmode, Brain Tumor Detection with YOLOv8, in: 2023 4th International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), 2024. pp. 1–5

    2023

  76. [76]

    S.U.R. Khan, M. Zhao, S. Asif, X. Chen, Hybrid‐NET: A fusion of DenseNet169 and advanced machine learning classifiers for enhanced brain tumor diagnosis, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 34 (2024) e22975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22975

    work page doi:10.1002/ima.22975 2024

  77. [77]

    T. Ruba, R. Tamilselvi, M.P. Beham, Brain tumor segmentation using JGate-AttResUNet–A novel deep learning approach, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 84 (2023) 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104926

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104926 2023

  78. [78]

    Mahesh, M

    T. Mahesh, M. Gupta, T. Anupama, O. Geman, An XAI-enhanced efficientNetB0 framework for precision brain tumor detection in MRI imaging, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 410 (2024) 110227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110227

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110227 2024

  79. [79]

    Zeineldin, M.E

    R.A. Zeineldin, M.E. Karar, J. Coburger, C.R. Wirtz, O. Burgert, DeepSeg: deep neural network framework for automatic brain tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance FLAIR images, International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 15 (2020) 909–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02186-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11548-020-02186-z 2020

  80. [80]

    Zafar, G

    W. Zafar, G. Husnain, A. Iqbal, A.S. Alzahrani, M.A. Irfan, Y .Y . Ghadi, M.S. AL-Zahrani, R.S. Naidu, Enhanced TumorNet: Leveraging YOLOv8s and U-net for superior brain tumor detection and segmentation utilizing MRI scans, Results in Engineering, 24 (2024) 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102994

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102994 2024

Showing first 80 references.