Secondary Production of Photons from ALP Dark Matter interacting with a Cosmological Magnetic Field

Abdias Aires; Ashu Kushwaha; Robert Brandenberger

arxiv: 2607.01399 · v1 · pith:NV2LWMEBnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Secondary Production of Photons from ALP Dark Matter interacting with a Cosmological Magnetic Field

Abdias Aires , Robert Brandenberger , Ashu Kushwaha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 18:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

keywords ALP dark matterChern-Simons termcosmological magnetic fieldssecondary photonsLyman-Werner rangeCMB constraintsX-ray observationsparametric resonance

0 comments

The pith

ALP dark matter interacting with cosmological magnetic fields via Chern-Simons coupling can produce sufficient Lyman-Werner photons while respecting CMB and X-ray constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how axion-like particle (ALP) dark matter, modeled as a coherently oscillating pseudoscalar field, generates secondary photons when coupled to a pre-existing cosmological magnetic field through the Chern-Simons term. It accounts for the magnetic field's spectral distribution, including cases where the field arises from parametric resonance due to the same coupling. The central result is that a large enough flux of photons in the Lyman-Werner frequency range is achievable without violating limits from cosmic microwave background and X-ray data. This approach is general for any magnetic field spectrum present at recombination. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a mechanism linking dark matter to observable photon production in the early universe without new contradictions.

Core claim

Under the assumption that dark matter is a coherently oscillating pseudoscalar field coupled to electromagnetism by the Chern-Simons term, the production of secondary photons from dark matter fluctuations coupled to a pre-existing magnetic field yields a sufficiently large flux in the Lyman-Werner frequency range that remains consistent with constraints from CMB and X-ray observations, applicable to magnetic fields generated by parametric resonance or any specified spectrum at recombination.

What carries the argument

The Chern-Simons coupling between the ALP dark matter field and the electromagnetic field in the presence of a cosmological magnetic field spectrum, which enables secondary photon production from dark matter fluctuations.

If this is right

The mechanism produces photons in the Lyman-Werner range from dark matter-magnetic field interactions.
It is consistent when the magnetic field is generated via parametric resonance from the same coupling.
The analysis holds for arbitrary magnetic field spectra at recombination.
Photon flux can be large enough for potential astrophysical relevance without observational conflicts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This could provide a source for photons influencing early structure formation or reionization processes.
Future precise measurements of magnetic field spectra could test the predicted photon production rates.
Similar interactions might apply to other frequency ranges or different dark matter models.

Load-bearing premise

Dark matter consists of a coherently oscillating pseudoscalar field with Chern-Simons coupling to electromagnetism, and a pre-existing magnetic field exists at recombination with a specified spectrum.

What would settle it

An X-ray observation or CMB measurement that rules out the required magnetic field strengths or shows photon fluxes inconsistent with the calculated secondary production rates.

read the original abstract

Under the assumption that dark matter is a coherently oscillating pseudoscalar field coupled to electromagnetism by the usual Chern-Simons term, we study the production of secondary photons from dark matter fluctuations coupled to a pre-existing magnetic field, taking into account the spectral distribution of the magnetic field. Specifically, we apply the formalism to the case of a large-scale magnetic field generated previously via a parametric resonance instability due to the same Chern-Simons coupling. However, our analysis is applicable to any spectrum of cosmological scale magnetic field fluctuations present at the time of recombination. We show that obtaining a sufficiently large flux of photons in the Lyman-Werner frequency range is consistent with constraints from CMB and X-ray observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows ALP dark matter can produce Lyman-Werner photons via interaction with cosmological B-fields at levels consistent with CMB and X-ray bounds, using an existing conversion formalism applied to parametrically generated fields.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors compute secondary photon production from ALP dark matter fluctuations in a pre-existing magnetic field spectrum and find choices of the coupling strength that yield enough Lyman-Werner flux while staying below current limits.

What is actually new is the concrete application of the ALP-photon conversion rate to a B-field spectrum generated by parametric resonance from the same Chern-Simons term, plus the statement that the result holds for arbitrary B-field spectra at recombination. The calculation itself follows standard methods rather than introducing new formalism.

The paper does a clean job of stating the assumptions up front and framing the result as a consistency check rather than a firm prediction. It identifies the relevant parameters and notes the observational channels that could test the idea.

The soft spots are modest. The central claim rests on the ALP being the dark matter and oscillating coherently, which is a standard but non-trivial assumption. When the B-field comes from the same coupling there is some linkage between input and output, though the authors mitigate this by allowing general spectra. The abstract gives no numerical flux values or error estimates, so the full text needs to show the derivations are solid and that redshift and absorption effects are handled properly.

This is for readers already working on ALP dark matter or cosmological magnetic fields. A specialist in that corner of phenomenology would get a usable calculation to build on. It deserves peer review because the approach is grounded in existing tools, the consistency statement is falsifiable, and the work is narrow but honest.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, assuming dark matter is a coherently oscillating ALP pseudoscalar with the standard Chern-Simons coupling to electromagnetism, secondary photons produced from ALP fluctuations interacting with a pre-existing cosmological magnetic field can yield a sufficient flux in the Lyman-Werner frequency range. This is shown to be consistent with CMB and X-ray constraints. The analysis applies to arbitrary magnetic field spectra at recombination, with the parametric-resonance-generated spectrum (from the same coupling) presented as one explicit example.

Significance. If the central consistency result holds, the work identifies a viable photon-production channel from ALP dark matter in cosmological magnetic fields that could be relevant for early-universe observables. The explicit statement that the result is independent of the detailed form of the B-field spectrum at recombination is a strength, as is the self-consistent parametric-resonance example. The paper identifies the key assumptions (coherent oscillation, Chern-Simons coupling, pre-existing B-field) up front.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the consistency statement would be strengthened by including at least one concrete numerical example of the achieved Lyman-Werner flux together with the corresponding ALP coupling and B-field amplitude.
The manuscript should clarify in the text whether the photon-production rate formula already incorporates redshift and absorption effects or whether those are applied separately after the calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, the recognition of the result's independence from the detailed form of the magnetic field spectrum at recombination, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; consistency result for arbitrary B-field spectra

full rationale

The paper's central result is a consistency statement: for any pre-existing magnetic field spectrum at recombination (with parametric resonance as one illustrative case), parameter choices exist such that secondary photon production yields sufficient Lyman-Werner flux while satisfying CMB and X-ray bounds. The derivation relies on the standard Chern-Simons interaction and ALP oscillation assumptions stated upfront, without reducing any output flux to a fitted input or self-generated B-spectrum by construction. The explicit statement that the analysis holds for arbitrary spectra prevents the primary application from forcing the result. No load-bearing self-citation chain or self-definitional step is present in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard ALP dark matter model plus the existence and spectrum of a cosmological magnetic field; no new particles or forces are introduced beyond the usual Chern-Simons term.

free parameters (2)

ALP-photon coupling strength
The dimensionless coupling constant that sets the conversion rate between the pseudoscalar and photons.
Magnetic field power spectrum parameters
Amplitude and spectral index of the B-field fluctuations at recombination, which control the photon production rate.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dark matter is a coherently oscillating pseudoscalar field
Explicitly stated as the modeling assumption for the dark matter component.
standard math Chern-Simons interaction term between pseudoscalar and electromagnetic field
Invoked as the usual coupling for ALP-photon interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1363 out tokens · 41977 ms · 2026-07-03T18:41:42.817738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

[1]

nal work on the direct collapse black hole formation sce- nario, and [14])

and vector dark matter [11]. nal work on the direct collapse black hole formation sce- nario, and [14]). However, there are obstacles to the cas- cade and thermalization arguments which were used in
[2]

to obtain the required LW flux. In a recent paper [15] it was pointed out that there is a natural way to gener- ate secondary photons from a pre-existing magnetic (B) field, namely by coupling the B-field to the dark matter density fluctuations (which are realized as fluctuations of the ultralight pseudoscalar fieldϕ). It was shown that a magnetic field o...
[3]

Secondary Production of Photons from ALP Dark Matter interacting with a Cosmological Magnetic Field

for a review article on magnetic fields, and [17] for studies of the lower bound which comes from cosmic ray observations) is able to produce a sufficiently high flux of LW photons to prevent molecular hydrogen formation and hence to allow for direct collapse super-massive black hole formation. In [15] the magnetic field was taken to be homogeneous. This ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[4]

Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 127-132 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8; L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 133-136 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90638-X; M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120,...

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8 1983
[5]

Ultra-light dark matter,

E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,” Astron. As- trophys. Rev.29, no.1, 7 (2021) doi:10.1007/s00159-021- 00135-6 [arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]]; L. Hui, “Wave Dark Matter,” Ann. Rev. Astron. As- trophys.59, 247-289 (2021) doi:10.1146/annurev-astro- 120920-010024 [arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1007/s00159-021- 2021
[6]

Primordial magnetic fields from pseudo-Goldstone bosons

M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, “Inflation Produced, Large Scale Magnetic Fields,” Phys. Rev. D37, 2743 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743; B. Ratra, “Cosmological ’seed’ magnetic field from inflation,” Astrophys. J. Lett.391, L1-L4 (1992) doi:10.1086/186384; S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field and R. Jackiw, “Lim- its on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modificatio...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.2743 1988
[7]

Cosmologi- cal Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,

R. Brandenberger, J. Fr¨ ohlich and H. Jiao, “Cosmologi- cal Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, no.3, 031001 (2026) doi:10.1103/ys32- 853g [arXiv:2502.19310 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/ys32- 2026
[8]

Photon production of axionic cold dark matter,

D. S. Lee and K. W. Ng, “Photon production of axionic cold dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D61, 085003 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.085003 [arXiv:hep- ph/9909282 [hep-ph]]; M. Hernandez, A. Avilez-L´ opez and T. Matos, “Could galactic magnetic fields be generated by charged ultra-light boson dark matter?,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.10, 833 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.085003 2000
[10]

Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models

T. Fujita, R. Namba, Y. Tada, N. Takeda and H. Tashiro, “Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion infla- tion models,” JCAP05, 054 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2015/05/054 [arXiv:1503.05802 [astro-ph.CO]]; P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, T. R. Scully and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Magnetogenesis from axion in- flation,” JCAP10, 039 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475- 7...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475- 2015
[11]

Suppressed Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter due to Finite Conductivity

R. Sharma, S. Majumdar and D. Sachdeva, “Suppressed Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter due to Fi- nite Conductivity,” [arXiv:2604.17230 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

Parametric Res- onance and Backreaction Effects in Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter,

N. Brahma and R. Brandenberger, “Parametric Res- onance and Backreaction Effects in Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2602.04285 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[13]

Late Time Mag- netogenesis from Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,

V. Kamali and R. Brandenberger, “Late Time Mag- netogenesis from Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2601.00443 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[14]

Indirect Parametric Resonance of the Electromagnetic Field Driven by an Oscillating SU(2) Dark Matter Condensate

T. Daniel, V. Kamali and R. Brandenberger, “Indi- rect Parametric Resonance of the Electromagnetic Field Driven by an Oscillating SU(2) Dark Matter Conden- sate,” [arXiv:2605.20333 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

Direct- collapse supermassive black holes from ultralight dark matter,

H. Jiao, R. Brandenberger and V. Kamali, “Direct- collapse supermassive black holes from ultralight dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.4, 043546 (2025) doi:10.1103/9jm1-ss4t [arXiv:2503.19414 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/9jm1-ss4t 2025
[16]

For- mation of supermassive black holes by direct col- lapse in pregalactic halos,

M. C. Begelman, M. Volonteri and M. J. Rees, “For- mation of supermassive black holes by direct col- lapse in pregalactic halos,” Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.370, 289-298 (2006) doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2006.10467.x [arXiv:astro-ph/0602363 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2006
[17]

Formation of Supermassive Black Holes

M. Volonteri, “Formation of Supermassive Black Holes,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.18, 279-315 (2010) doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x [arXiv:1003.4404 [astro- ph.CO]]; 6 M. Volonteri, M. Habouzit and M. Colpi, “The ori- gins of massive black holes,” Nature Rev. Phys.3, no.11, 732-743 (2021) doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9 [arXiv:2110.10175 [astro-ph.GA]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x 2010
[18]

ALP Dark Matter, Cosmological Magnetic Fields and the Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation Scenario,

A. Kushwaha and R. Brandenberger, “ALP Dark Matter, Cosmological Magnetic Fields and the Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation Scenario,” [arXiv:2602.22170 [hep- ph]]

work page arXiv
[19]

Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

R. Durrer and A. Neronov, “Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21, 62 (2013) doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 [arXiv:1303.7121 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 2013
[20]

EGMF Constraints from Simultaneous GeV-TeV Observations of Blazars

A. M. Taylor, I. Vovk and A. Neronov, “Extragalactic magnetic fields constraints from simultaneous GeV- TeV observations of blazars,” Astron. Astrophys. 529, A144 (2011) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116441 [arXiv:1101.0932 [astro-ph.HE]]; M. Ackermannet al.[Fermi-LAT], “The Search for Spatial Extension in High-latitude Sources Detected by theF ermiLarge Area ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116441 2011
[21]

Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism,

R. Brandenberger, “Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.10, 103523 (2025) doi:10.1103/k3hh-gszm [arXiv:2507.00785 [hep- ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/k3hh-gszm 2025
[22]

Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,

N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.6, 063517 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063517 [arXiv:2203.05750 [astro-ph.CO]]; S. May, N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Updated bounds on ultra-light dark matter from the tiniest galaxies,” [arXiv:2509.02781 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.063517 2022
[23]

Searching for Axion-like particle Dark Matter with Time-domain Polarization: Constraints from a proto- planetary disk,

K. Narita, T. Fujita, R. Tazaki and B. Hatsukade, “Searching for Axion-like particle Dark Matter with Time-domain Polarization: Constraints from a proto- planetary disk,” [arXiv:2602.15611 [astro-ph.CO]]; N. Barbieri, L. Caloni, M. Gerbino, M. Lattanzi and L. Visinelli, “Beyond thermal approximations: Pre- cise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles,...

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 2016
[24]

ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Extra-Galactic Sky Temperature at 3-90 GHz,

D. J. Fixsen, A. Kogut, S. Levin, M. Limon, P. Lubin, P. Mirel, M. Seiffert, J. Singal, E. Wollack and T. Villela, et al.“ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Extra-Galactic Sky Temperature at 3-90 GHz,” Astrophys. J.734, 5 (2011) doi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/5

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/1/5 2011
[25]

An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum

J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Mon- salve, T. J. Mozdzen and N. Mahesh, “An ab- sorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,” Nature555, no.7694, 67- 70 (2018) doi:10.1038/nature25792 [arXiv:1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature25792 2018
[26]

The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set

D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer and E. L. Wright, “The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set,” Astrophys. J.473, 576 (1996) doi:10.1086/178173 [arXiv:astro-ph/9605054 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/178173 1996
[27]

Spectro- spatial evolution of the CMB. Part I. Discretisa- tion of the thermalisation Green’s function,

J. Chluba, T. Kite and A. Ravenni, “Spectro- spatial evolution of the CMB. Part I. Discretisa- tion of the thermalisation Green’s function,” JCAP 11, 026 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/026 [arXiv:2210.09327 [astro-ph.CO]]; J. Chluba, A. Ravenni and T. Kite, “Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB. Part II. Generalised Boltzmann hierarchy,” JCAP11, 027...

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/026 2023
[28]

The Chandra COSMOS legacy survey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-ray Background and constraints on undetected populations

N. Cappelluti, Y. Li, A. Ricarte, B. Agarwal, V. Alle- vato, T. T. Ananna, M. Ajello, F. Civano, A. Comastri and M. Elvis,et al.“The Chandra COSMOS legacy sur- vey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-ray Background and constraints on undetected populations,” Astrophys. J.837, no.1, 19 (2017) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea4 [arXiv:1702.01660 [astro-ph.HE]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea4 2017
[29]

Roper Pol, C

A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, A. Neronov, and D. Semikoz, Gravitational wave signal from primordial magnetic fields in the Pulsar Timing Array frequency band, Phys. Rev. D105, 123502 (2022)

2022
[30]

Neronov, A

A. Neronov, A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, and D. Semikoz, NANOGrav signal from magnetohydrodynamic turbu- lence at the QCD phase transition in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D103, L041302 (2021)

2021

[1] [1]

nal work on the direct collapse black hole formation sce- nario, and [14])

and vector dark matter [11]. nal work on the direct collapse black hole formation sce- nario, and [14]). However, there are obstacles to the cas- cade and thermalization arguments which were used in

[2] [2]

to obtain the required LW flux. In a recent paper [15] it was pointed out that there is a natural way to gener- ate secondary photons from a pre-existing magnetic (B) field, namely by coupling the B-field to the dark matter density fluctuations (which are realized as fluctuations of the ultralight pseudoscalar fieldϕ). It was shown that a magnetic field o...

[3] [3]

Secondary Production of Photons from ALP Dark Matter interacting with a Cosmological Magnetic Field

for a review article on magnetic fields, and [17] for studies of the lower bound which comes from cosmic ray observations) is able to produce a sufficiently high flux of LW photons to prevent molecular hydrogen formation and hence to allow for direct collapse super-massive black hole formation. In [15] the magnetic field was taken to be homogeneous. This ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[4] [4]

Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 127-132 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8; L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120, 133-136 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90638-X; M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120,...

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8 1983

[5] [5]

Ultra-light dark matter,

E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,” Astron. As- trophys. Rev.29, no.1, 7 (2021) doi:10.1007/s00159-021- 00135-6 [arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]]; L. Hui, “Wave Dark Matter,” Ann. Rev. Astron. As- trophys.59, 247-289 (2021) doi:10.1146/annurev-astro- 120920-010024 [arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1007/s00159-021- 2021

[6] [6]

Primordial magnetic fields from pseudo-Goldstone bosons

M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, “Inflation Produced, Large Scale Magnetic Fields,” Phys. Rev. D37, 2743 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743; B. Ratra, “Cosmological ’seed’ magnetic field from inflation,” Astrophys. J. Lett.391, L1-L4 (1992) doi:10.1086/186384; S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field and R. Jackiw, “Lim- its on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modificatio...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.2743 1988

[7] [7]

Cosmologi- cal Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,

R. Brandenberger, J. Fr¨ ohlich and H. Jiao, “Cosmologi- cal Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, no.3, 031001 (2026) doi:10.1103/ys32- 853g [arXiv:2502.19310 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/ys32- 2026

[8] [8]

Photon production of axionic cold dark matter,

D. S. Lee and K. W. Ng, “Photon production of axionic cold dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D61, 085003 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.085003 [arXiv:hep- ph/9909282 [hep-ph]]; M. Hernandez, A. Avilez-L´ opez and T. Matos, “Could galactic magnetic fields be generated by charged ultra-light boson dark matter?,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.10, 833 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.085003 2000

[9] [10]

Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models

T. Fujita, R. Namba, Y. Tada, N. Takeda and H. Tashiro, “Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion infla- tion models,” JCAP05, 054 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2015/05/054 [arXiv:1503.05802 [astro-ph.CO]]; P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, T. R. Scully and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Magnetogenesis from axion in- flation,” JCAP10, 039 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475- 7...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475- 2015

[10] [11]

Suppressed Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter due to Finite Conductivity

R. Sharma, S. Majumdar and D. Sachdeva, “Suppressed Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter due to Fi- nite Conductivity,” [arXiv:2604.17230 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[11] [12]

Parametric Res- onance and Backreaction Effects in Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter,

N. Brahma and R. Brandenberger, “Parametric Res- onance and Backreaction Effects in Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2602.04285 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page arXiv

[12] [13]

Late Time Mag- netogenesis from Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,

V. Kamali and R. Brandenberger, “Late Time Mag- netogenesis from Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2601.00443 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv

[13] [14]

Indirect Parametric Resonance of the Electromagnetic Field Driven by an Oscillating SU(2) Dark Matter Condensate

T. Daniel, V. Kamali and R. Brandenberger, “Indi- rect Parametric Resonance of the Electromagnetic Field Driven by an Oscillating SU(2) Dark Matter Conden- sate,” [arXiv:2605.20333 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[14] [15]

Direct- collapse supermassive black holes from ultralight dark matter,

H. Jiao, R. Brandenberger and V. Kamali, “Direct- collapse supermassive black holes from ultralight dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.4, 043546 (2025) doi:10.1103/9jm1-ss4t [arXiv:2503.19414 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/9jm1-ss4t 2025

[15] [16]

For- mation of supermassive black holes by direct col- lapse in pregalactic halos,

M. C. Begelman, M. Volonteri and M. J. Rees, “For- mation of supermassive black holes by direct col- lapse in pregalactic halos,” Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.370, 289-298 (2006) doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2006.10467.x [arXiv:astro-ph/0602363 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2006

[16] [17]

Formation of Supermassive Black Holes

M. Volonteri, “Formation of Supermassive Black Holes,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.18, 279-315 (2010) doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x [arXiv:1003.4404 [astro- ph.CO]]; 6 M. Volonteri, M. Habouzit and M. Colpi, “The ori- gins of massive black holes,” Nature Rev. Phys.3, no.11, 732-743 (2021) doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9 [arXiv:2110.10175 [astro-ph.GA]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x 2010

[17] [18]

ALP Dark Matter, Cosmological Magnetic Fields and the Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation Scenario,

A. Kushwaha and R. Brandenberger, “ALP Dark Matter, Cosmological Magnetic Fields and the Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation Scenario,” [arXiv:2602.22170 [hep- ph]]

work page arXiv

[18] [19]

Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

R. Durrer and A. Neronov, “Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21, 62 (2013) doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 [arXiv:1303.7121 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 2013

[19] [20]

EGMF Constraints from Simultaneous GeV-TeV Observations of Blazars

A. M. Taylor, I. Vovk and A. Neronov, “Extragalactic magnetic fields constraints from simultaneous GeV- TeV observations of blazars,” Astron. Astrophys. 529, A144 (2011) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116441 [arXiv:1101.0932 [astro-ph.HE]]; M. Ackermannet al.[Fermi-LAT], “The Search for Spatial Extension in High-latitude Sources Detected by theF ermiLarge Area ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116441 2011

[20] [21]

Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism,

R. Brandenberger, “Noninflationary axion and ALP mis- alignment mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.10, 103523 (2025) doi:10.1103/k3hh-gszm [arXiv:2507.00785 [hep- ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/k3hh-gszm 2025

[21] [22]

Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,

N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.6, 063517 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063517 [arXiv:2203.05750 [astro-ph.CO]]; S. May, N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Updated bounds on ultra-light dark matter from the tiniest galaxies,” [arXiv:2509.02781 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.063517 2022

[22] [23]

Searching for Axion-like particle Dark Matter with Time-domain Polarization: Constraints from a proto- planetary disk,

K. Narita, T. Fujita, R. Tazaki and B. Hatsukade, “Searching for Axion-like particle Dark Matter with Time-domain Polarization: Constraints from a proto- planetary disk,” [arXiv:2602.15611 [astro-ph.CO]]; N. Barbieri, L. Caloni, M. Gerbino, M. Lattanzi and L. Visinelli, “Beyond thermal approximations: Pre- cise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles,...

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 2016

[23] [24]

ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Extra-Galactic Sky Temperature at 3-90 GHz,

D. J. Fixsen, A. Kogut, S. Levin, M. Limon, P. Lubin, P. Mirel, M. Seiffert, J. Singal, E. Wollack and T. Villela, et al.“ARCADE 2 Measurement of the Extra-Galactic Sky Temperature at 3-90 GHz,” Astrophys. J.734, 5 (2011) doi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/5

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/1/5 2011

[24] [25]

An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum

J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Mon- salve, T. J. Mozdzen and N. Mahesh, “An ab- sorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,” Nature555, no.7694, 67- 70 (2018) doi:10.1038/nature25792 [arXiv:1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature25792 2018

[25] [26]

The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set

D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer and E. L. Wright, “The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set,” Astrophys. J.473, 576 (1996) doi:10.1086/178173 [arXiv:astro-ph/9605054 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/178173 1996

[26] [27]

Spectro- spatial evolution of the CMB. Part I. Discretisa- tion of the thermalisation Green’s function,

J. Chluba, T. Kite and A. Ravenni, “Spectro- spatial evolution of the CMB. Part I. Discretisa- tion of the thermalisation Green’s function,” JCAP 11, 026 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/026 [arXiv:2210.09327 [astro-ph.CO]]; J. Chluba, A. Ravenni and T. Kite, “Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB. Part II. Generalised Boltzmann hierarchy,” JCAP11, 027...

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/026 2023

[27] [28]

The Chandra COSMOS legacy survey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-ray Background and constraints on undetected populations

N. Cappelluti, Y. Li, A. Ricarte, B. Agarwal, V. Alle- vato, T. T. Ananna, M. Ajello, F. Civano, A. Comastri and M. Elvis,et al.“The Chandra COSMOS legacy sur- vey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-ray Background and constraints on undetected populations,” Astrophys. J.837, no.1, 19 (2017) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea4 [arXiv:1702.01660 [astro-ph.HE]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea4 2017

[28] [29]

Roper Pol, C

A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, A. Neronov, and D. Semikoz, Gravitational wave signal from primordial magnetic fields in the Pulsar Timing Array frequency band, Phys. Rev. D105, 123502 (2022)

2022

[29] [30]

Neronov, A

A. Neronov, A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, and D. Semikoz, NANOGrav signal from magnetohydrodynamic turbu- lence at the QCD phase transition in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D103, L041302 (2021)

2021