Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 296 references

White-dwarf tidal disruptions around intermediate-mass black holes produce soft X-rays near the Eddington limit, MeV neutrinos, and decihertz gravitational-wave bursts.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 01:50 UTC pith:MZ3PT7YO

load-bearing objection Solid multi-messenger modeling paper for WD–IMBH TDEs: the soft-X-ray L~few L_Edd claim is robust; the real soft spots are face-on unreprocessed spectra and the neutrino/timescale dependence on rapid circularization. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05899 v2 pith:MZ3PT7YO submitted 2026-07-07 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Multi-messenger View of White Dwarf Tidal Disruption Events by Intermediate-Mass Black Holes: I. Gravitational Waves and Disk Photon and Neutrino Emissions

Jin-Hong Chen , Lixin Dai , Bing Zhang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords tidal disruption eventswhite dwarfsintermediate-mass black holessuper-Eddington accretionMeV neutrinosdecihertz gravitational wavesmulti-messenger astronomyadvection-dominated disks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper builds a multi-messenger model of white-dwarf tidal disruption events by intermediate-mass black holes. After disruption the bound debris falls back at rates millions to billions of times the Eddington rate, forming a hot, thick accretion disk. The authors solve a steady, vertically integrated disk that includes advection, radiation and magnetic pressure, nuclear burning, wind mass loss, and neutrino cooling from electron–positron pair annihilation. They find the flow remains advection-dominated over a wide range of rates, so the thermal photon luminosity only mildly exceeds the black-hole Eddington luminosity and the spectrum peaks in soft X-rays near 0.1–1 keV, nearly independent of the instantaneous fallback rate. For the hottest disks around the lowest-mass black holes, pair annihilation can also drive a short MeV neutrino burst, while the final flyby itself radiates a gravitational-wave burst whose frequency falls in the decihertz band targeted by proposed space missions. The practical payoff is a set of concrete, coordinated search strategies for Einstein Probe X-ray monitors, decihertz gravitational-wave detectors, and MeV neutrino observatories.

Core claim

In the extremely super-Eddington regime of white-dwarf tidal disruptions, the newly formed disk is predominantly advection-dominated; consequently its thermal electromagnetic luminosity saturates only a few times above the intermediate-mass black hole’s Eddington luminosity and its spectrum peaks at approximately 0.1–1 keV, remaining nearly insensitive to the fallback rate. The same hot inner flow can produce a MeV neutrino burst reaching ~10^47 erg s^{-1} for oxygen–neon–magnesium white dwarfs around ~10^3 solar-mass black holes, while the pre-disruption gravitational-wave burst peaks at ~0.1–1 Hz.

What carries the argument

A steady, vertically integrated pair–nuclear accretion-disk (PNAD) model that balances viscous plus nuclear heating against radiative diffusion, advection, wind losses and optically thin pair-annihilation neutrino cooling, solved across white-dwarf compositions and black-hole masses to yield temperature, density, luminosity and multi-messenger spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that debris circularizes quickly enough for the disk accretion rate to track the fallback rate, so that steady disk solutions at each fallback rate map directly onto the observable light curve.

What would settle it

A soft X-ray light curve of a confirmed white-dwarf tidal disruption whose luminosity continues to rise in lockstep with an independently measured super-Eddington fallback rate, or a non-detection of the predicted 0.1–1 keV thermal component once the jet has faded, would directly test the claimed luminosity saturation and spectral peak.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a steady, vertically integrated accretion-disk model for white-dwarf tidal disruption events around intermediate-mass black holes, incorporating magnetic pressure, nuclear burning, wind mass loss, and e± pair-annihilation neutrino cooling (pair–nuclear accretion disks). At the extremely super-Eddington rates expected for WD–TDEs, the inner flow reaches T≳10^9 K and is predominantly advection-dominated; the thermal EM luminosity only mildly exceeds the IMBH Eddington luminosity and peaks at ∼0.1–1 keV, while ONeMg debris around ∼10^3 M_⊙ IMBHs can produce MeV neutrino bursts up to ∼10^47 erg s^{-1} (Galactic-only detectability). The authors also estimate the GW burst from the final parabolic passage (characteristic frequencies ∼0.1–1 Hz, accessible to proposed decihertz detectors) and a weaker precessing-disk GW signal (horizon ≲1 Mpc). Analytic advection/radiation-pressure scalings (Appendix D) are shown to match the numerical disk profiles, and a simplified global evolution model is used to check that Ṁ_acc tracks Ṁ_fb under wind-mediated viscous transport.

Significance. If the modeling holds, the work supplies a concrete multi-messenger baseline for WD–IMBH TDEs: a robust soft X-ray thermal component nearly independent of fallback rate in the super-Eddington regime, falsifiable MeV neutrino predictions limited to Galactic distances, and GW burst frequencies that place one-off WD–TDEs in the target band of DECIGO/BBO/ALIA. Strengths include explicit microphysical ingredients (pair pressure, Rosseland opacity with Klein–Nishina/pair corrections, neutrino emissivity fit validated against Itoh et al. 1989), analytic scalings that reproduce the numerical solutions, and clear parameter dependence of spectra and luminosities. The connection to the candidate EP250702a and the motivation for coordinated GW+EM+neutrino searches are timely. The companion-paper split (jets/coronae/winds deferred) is appropriate for scope control.

major comments (2)
  1. §4.1, Eqs. (13)–(15) and Fig. 8: All soft X-ray detectability comparisons (EP-WXT/FXT, Swift-XRT, Chandra) assume a face-on, unreprocessed blackbody disk with σ T_eff^4 = Q_rad. The manuscript itself notes that thick-disk geometry, GR effects, and wind reprocessing can obscure or reprocess the inner emission (citing Dai et al. 2018; Qiao et al. 2025), and §7.3 argues that the wind photosphere may dominate late-time optical emission. Because the multi-messenger detectability claim for current X-ray facilities rests on these face-on fluxes, the paper should either (i) quantify how inclination and wind reprocessing change the soft X-ray flux (e.g., a simple covering-factor or funnel model) or (ii) clearly reframe the claim as an upper-bound polar-view prediction and state the conditions under which the thermal component remains observable.
  2. §2 and emission calculations vs. §7.2: The load-bearing premise Ṁ_acc ≃ Ṁ_fb is used for all EM and neutrino maps, with only a simplified global evolution check later (Eq. 42; Figs. 18–19). That check is reassuring for wind-mediated viscous disks, but circularization efficiency and stream–disk dissipation remain open (§7.1). The bolometric L ~ few–10 L_Edd result is robust once the flow is super-Eddington (Eq. D26; Fig. 7), so the EM claim is not critically threatened; however, the neutrino peak luminosity and absolute timescales are sensitive to the true peak Ṁ_acc. A short quantitative statement of how incomplete circularization (e.g., Ṁ_acc = f Ṁ_fb with f < 1) rescales Ṁ_ν and the duration of the MeV burst would make the multi-messenger predictions more robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and §4.2: Neutrino luminosity is quoted as up to ∼10^47 erg s^{-1} for ONeMg WD–TDEs, while Fig. 10 caption gives peak values ∼2.5×10^45 erg s^{-1} for M_h = 10^3 M_⊙. Please reconcile the abstract/text peak with the figure (or state the exact parameter combination that reaches 10^47).
  2. Fig. 17: The multi-messenger power histories are useful but dense; labeling the assumed jet efficiency (0.01 Ṁ_fb c^2 with radiative efficiency ∼0.01) more prominently in the caption would help readers separate model components from order-of-magnitude jet estimates.
  3. §5.2, Eq. (36)–(37): The precessing-disk GW power is extremely sensitive to R_out (∝ R_out^{-14}). Given that §7.2 finds only modest viscous spreading, a brief note that the horizon in Fig. 16 assumes R_out ≃ R_c (and degrades rapidly if the disk expands) would prevent over-interpretation.
  4. Notation: Ṁ_acc, Ṁ_in, Ṁ_fb, and Ṁ_BH are all used; a short glossary or consistent usage in §3–4 would reduce ambiguity when winds are active.
  5. Typos/formatting: “Gravitational W aves” in the title line; occasional missing spaces in units (e.g., erg s^{-1}); ensure arXiv identifiers and GCN citations are consistently formatted in the reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: EM/neutrino/GW outputs are computed from standard disk microphysics and free parameters; self-citations supply context and fallback scalings, not the load-bearing disk structure.

full rationale

The paper builds a steady, vertically integrated PNAD model from standard ingredients (alpha-viscosity, radiation+gas+magnetic pressure, advection, wind mass-loss with free s-index, pair-annihilation neutrino emissivity fitted to Itoh et al. 1989, nuclear rates from Caughlan & Fowler 1988). The strongest EM claim—that L_gamma only mildly exceeds L_Edd and peaks at ~0.1–1 keV, nearly independent of fallback rate—follows analytically from Q_vis ≃ Q_adv + Q_w with P ≃ P_rad (Appendix D, Eq. D26: L ≃ μ ln(R_out/R_in) L_Edd ≃ 9 L_Edd) and is confirmed numerically (Fig. 7). Neutrino luminosities and spectra are direct integrals of the same temperature structure (Eqs. 16–18); GW burst and precession signals use the Peters–Mathews quadrupole and Lense–Thirring torque with disk mass/size from the model. The premise ˙M_acc ≃ ˙M_fb is an explicit modeling assumption later checked with a simplified global evolution (Sec. 7.2, Figs. 18–19), not a fitted input re-labeled as prediction. Self-citations (Chen & Shen 2018, Chen et al. 2023/2024, Dai et al. 2018) provide TDE context, fallback scalings, and wind-reprocessing caveats; they are not uniqueness theorems that force the disk solutions. The EP250702a comparison is a post-hoc consistency check, not a fit. Score 1 only for ordinary non-load-bearing self-citation of prior TDE/GW work by the same group.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 8 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central multi-messenger claims rest on standard accretion and GW physics plus a handful of hand-chosen disk parameters and the modeling choice that fallback maps to a steady disk. No new particles or forces are introduced; 'PNAD' is a regime label. Nuclear burning and magnetic pressure are included but shown sub-dominant, so they are not load-bearing free knobs for the main EM/GW results.

free parameters (8)
  • viscosity α
    Set to 0.1 (scanned 0.01–1); controls temperature, surface density, and neutrino luminosity at fixed ˙M.
  • IMBH spin a•
    Default 0.95; sets R_in (ISCO) and thus spectrum hardness and precession frequency.
  • wind mass-loss index s
    ˙M_in ∝ R^s with typical s~0.2 (scanned 0–1); reduces inner ˙M, cools the flow, and lowers neutrino output.
  • wind kinetic factor K
    Appears in Q_w ≃ (sK/3) Q_vis; taken ~1 without independent calibration for WD–TDEs.
  • disk outer radius R_out / R_in
    Default 100 for luminosity/spectra; strongly affects soft flux and L_γ ∝ ln(R_out/R_in).
  • radiative efficiency η
    η≃0.12 used to define ˙M_Edd; standard Novikov–Thorne choice, still a normalization of all Eddington ratios.
  • advection factor ξ
    ξ~1 in Q_adv; order-unity coefficient taken from standard slim-disk literature.
  • disk tilt θ and precessing mass M_d for GW
    θ=π/4 and M_d from ˙M t_ν used for precessing-disk horizons; geometry not measured.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Steady, vertically integrated α-disk with zero-torque ISCO boundary and relativistic correction factor f from Page–Thorne/Riffert–Herold.
    §3 and App. A.1; maps a time-dependent TDE onto a sequence of steady solutions.
  • domain assumption ˙M_acc closely tracks ˙M_fb once a disk forms, with wind-mediated mass loss ˙M_in∝R^s.
    §2 and §7.2; required to convert fallback histories into emission light curves.
  • domain assumption Neutrino cooling is optically thin pair annihilation only; nuclear captures and trapping negligible.
    App. A.3; optical-depth estimates τ≪1 justify free-streaming MeV spectra.
  • domain assumption Magnetic pressure saturates at P_B≃ρ v_K c_gas and remains sub-dominant.
    App. A.2; retained for completeness, shown not to change structure much.
  • ad hoc to paper Face-on blackbody disk spectrum from σ T_eff^4 = Q_rad without full GR transfer or wind reprocessing for the primary EM prediction.
    §4.1; authors defer thick-disk geometry and reprocessing to future work.
  • domain assumption Parabolic one-off disruption with R_p=R_t for the GW burst; Peters–Mathews/Berry–Gair energy spectrum.
    §5.1; defines the decihertz burst calculation.
  • domain assumption Rigid-body Lense–Thirring precession of a thick disk with Σ∝R^ζ, ζ~−0.25 to −0.2, and constant tilt during super-Eddington phase.
    §5.2; underlies the weaker continuous GW signal.
  • domain assumption Standard WD mass–radius relation and full-disruption energy spread Δε≃GM_h R_*/R_t^2.
    §2; sets t_fb and ˙M_peak for He/CO/ONeMg cases.
invented entities (1)
  • Pair–nuclear accretion disk (PNAD) no independent evidence
    purpose: Label for the intermediate super-Eddington WD–TDE flow including pairs, nuclear heating, and neutrinos without NDAF-level neutrino dominance.
    Naming of a physical regime built from known processes; not a new particle, force, or conserved quantity. independent_evidence is false as a named entity, though the underlying pair/neutrino physics is standard.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 40377 in / 4552 out tokens · 51532 ms · 2026-07-11T01:50:56.655304+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

White dwarf (WD) tidal disruption events (TDEs) provide a unique window onto intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs). We present a multi-messenger view of these systems in two papers. In this paper, we develop an accretion-disk model for WD--TDEs in which the bound debris accretes at extremely super-Eddington rates, $\sim 10^5$--$10^9$ times higher than in typical (main-sequence) TDEs. The model includes magnetic pressure, nuclear-burning heating, wind mass loss, and neutrino production via $e^{\pm}$ pair annihilation. At such high accretion rates, the gas and radiation temperatures of the inner flow can reach $T\gtrsim 10^9\,\mathrm{K}$, enabling prolific pair production and MeV neutrino emission. We find that the disk is predominantly advection dominated over a broad range of accretion rates, while disk winds can partially cool the flow and reduce the inner temperature. The predicted thermal EM emission is nearly insensitive to the fallback rate in the super-Eddington regime: the luminosity only mildly exceeds the IMBH Eddington luminosity and the spectrum peaks at $\sim 0.1$--$1\,\mathrm{keV}$, implying detectability with current X-ray facilities such as Einstein Probe. For low-mass IMBHs ($\sim 10^3\,M_{\odot}$), the disk can also produce a burst of MeV neutrinos with luminosities up to $\sim 10^{47}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$ for ONeMg WD--TDEs, although detectability with current neutrino detectors (e.g., Super-Kamiokande and JUNO) is limited to Galactic distances. Finally, we estimate the GW burst produced during the final passage prior to disruption, which peaks at $\sim 0.1$--$1\,\mathrm{Hz}$, placing WD--TDEs in the target band of proposed decihertz detectors and motivating coordinated GW+EM+neutrino searches. We also present a first exploration of GWs from a precessing WD--TDE disk; this signal is much weaker, with a detection horizon $\lesssim 1\,\mathrm{Mpc}$ for these missions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05899 by Bing Zhang, Jin-Hong Chen, Lixin Dai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Eddington ratio versus WD mass for WD TDEs, derived from Equations (2) and (7). yields the Eddington ratio as a function of WD mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic overview of a WD–TDE and its multi-messenger channels. The pericenter passage can generate a GW burst, while subsequent disruption and circularization form a thick accretion disk fed by rapid fallback. At sufficiently high temperatures, e ± pairs in the inner disk produce MeV neutrinos via pair annihilation, and nuclear burning (T ≳ 108 K) provides additional heating. If the disk angular-momentum… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature profile of the He WD–TDE disk over a range of accretion rates. Colors indicate the ratio Qadv/Q+, highlighting the dominance of advective cooling. Radiative cooling becomes competitive only in the outer disk at low accretion rates (M˙ acc ≲ 10 M˙ Edd). gies and fluxes because neutrino cooling becomes more important at the corresponding higher accretion rates. This thermal disk component can fal… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: He WD–TDE disk profiles for temperature (up￾per), surface density (middle), and pressure (lower) at three representative fallback rates. We vary magnetic pressure and disk winds independently to assess their impact on the struc￾ture at different accretion rates. Gray curves show the ana￾lytic scalings from Equations (D24–D25). reprocessing; therefore, we focus on the face-on case (i = 0). The numerically c… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temperature profile of the ONeMg WD–TDE disk over a range of accretion rates. Colors indicate the ratio Qν/Q+, demonstrating that neutrino cooling is negligible. 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 10 10 Macc/MEdd 10 42 10 43 10 44 L (e r g s 1 ) Mh = 10 5 M Mh = 10 4 M Mh = 10 3 M ONeMg WD-TDE CO WD-TDE He WD-TDE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: EM luminosity of WD–TDE disks as a function of mass fallback rate, from 10 M˙ Edd up to the peak fallback rate for each WD composition. The horizontal black line marks the analytic luminosity of an advection- and radia￾tion-pressure-dominated disk, 2 ln(Rout/Rin)LEdd ≃ 9LEdd (Equation (D26)). The luminosity varies weakly with M˙ acc and peaks near M˙ acc ≃ 108 M˙ Edd, where e ± pairs contribute to the pres… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Observed EM spectra at the peak fallback rate for each WD–TDE disk, assuming redshift z = 0.1 (upper) and z = 1 (lower). Solid, dashed, and dot-dashed curves cor￾respond to IMBH masses 103 , 104 , and 105 M⊙, respectively. Horizontal gray lines indicate representative flux limits of soft X-ray instruments (e.g., EP-WXT/FXT, Swift-XRT, Chandra). The dependence of E˙ ν on the wind s-index and viscos￾ity is s… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dependence of the observed EM spectra (at the peak fallback rate) on different parameters, assuming z = 0.1 and Mh = 104 M⊙. Upper left (disk size Rout): solid, dashed, and dotted curves show Rout = 100 Rin, Rout = 10 Rin, and 1000 Rin, respectively. Upper right (IMBH spin a•): solid, dashed, and dotted curves show a• = 0.95, a• = 0, and a• = −0.95, respectively. Lower left (wind s-index): solid, dashed, a… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Neutrino luminosity of WD–TDE disks from electron–positron pair annihilation, as a function of mass fallback rate (from 10 M˙ Edd to the peak fallback rate for each WD composition). Neutrino production is negligible for M˙ acc ≲ 108 M˙ Edd and rises steeply with M˙ acc. Solid, dashed and dotted lines are E˙ ν for Mh = 103 M⊙, 104 M⊙ and 105 M⊙, respectively. For Mh = 103 M⊙, the peak values are E˙ ν ≃ 3 ×… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dependence of the neutrino luminosity of WD-TDE disks on parameter s-index (M˙ in ∝ R s , upper panel) and viscosity α (lower panel). s = 0 represents no mass loss through wind. As disk wind provides an addi￾tional cooling on disk, it can reduce the neutrino luminosity. For the same accretion rate, lower α disk has higher temper￾ature, thus produce higher neutrino luminosity. 10 3 10 1 10 1 E (MeV) 10 0 1… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Differential neutrino spectra from WD–TDE disks. The three dashes lines represent the detection flux limit for JUNO, Hyper-K and IceCube-Gen2 with Texpo ≃ 10 s exposure time. The emission peaks at ∼ 0.1–1 MeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Effective GW strain for a WD–TDE on a parabolic orbit with Rp = Rt at a distance of DL = 1 Mpc, compared with the sensitivity curves of different GW detectors. Different WD compositions are shown with different colors. The extended shapes indicate different M∗; more massive WDs generally yield higher peak frequencies and larger strains. The characteristic GW frequency peaks at ∼ 0.1–1 Hz. Next-generation … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: GW power Pprec from a precessing disk ver￾sus WD mass. The color indicates the precession frequency fprec. The two curves correspond to different IMBH masses. The disk tilt angle and disk size are fixed to θ = π/4 and Rout ≃ Rc. one precession cycle: Pprec = 2 5 (2π) 6 G c 5 (I3 − I1) 2 f 6 prec sin2 θ(1 + 15 sin2 θ) ≃ 1039|a•| 6  Md 0.1M⊙ 2 M−2 3  Rout 10Rg −14 × sin2 θ(1 + 15 sin2 θ) erg s−1 . (36) … view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: GW horizon distance for precessing disks in WD–TDEs. Different lines represent different detectors. The disk tilt angle and disk size are fixed to θ = π/4 and Rout ≃ Rc. Sky averaging gives ⟨|h˜(f)| 2 ⟩sky = 1 4π Z 2π 0 dϕ Z π 0 |h˜(f)| 2 sin ι dι = 16 5 h ′ 0 2 sin2 θ cos 2 θδ(f − fprec)Tobs + 64 5 h ′ 0 2 sin4 θδ(f − 2fprec)Tobs, (39) where we regularize the ill-defined δ(f − fprec) 2 by assuming a fini… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: EM, GW, and neutrino power histories for WD TDEs with different IMBH masses and WD types, for representative peak fallback rates of ≃ 8.5 × 108 M˙ Edd (He), ≃ 8.1 × 109 M˙ Edd (CO), and ≃ 1011 M˙ Edd (ONeMg). During pericenter passage, the time-varying quadrupole moment produces a GW burst. Subsequent debris fallback can form a compact accretion disk, whose thermal emission mildly exceeds the Eddington lu… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Accretion rate M˙ acc (solid) compared with the fallback rate M˙ fb (dashed). The accretion rate is calculated by Equation (42) with Mh = 103 M⊙ and α = 0.1. The two closely coincide because the disk rapidly adjusts through viscous transport while winds regulate the net mass flow. the disk outer radius and discuss how it affects the emergent EM spectrum. Motivated by R. Shen & C. D. Matzner (2014), we com… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 296 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Tanvir, N

    Levan, A. and Tanvir, N. and Cenko, S. and Perley, D. and Wiersema, K. and Bloom, J. and Fruchter, A. and Postigo, A. and. 2011 , title=. doi:10.1126/Sci.1207143 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1126/sci.1207143 2011

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1126/Sci.1207150 , journal=

    2011 , title=. doi:10.1126/Sci.1207150 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1126/sci.1207150 2011

  3. [3]

    and Berger, E

    Zauderer, B. and Berger, E. and Soderberg, A. and Loeb, A. and Narayan, R. and Frail, D. and Petitpas, G. and Brunthaler, A. and Chornock, R. and Carpenter, J. and Pooley, G. and Mooley, K. and Kulkarni, S. and Margutti, R. and Fox, D. and Nakar, E. and Patel, N. and Volgenau, N. and Culverhouse, T. and Bietenholz, M. and Rupen, M. and. 2011 , title=. doi...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10366 2011

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1038/nature10374 , journal=

    2011 , title=. doi:10.1038/nature10374 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10374 2011

  5. [6]

    On the Survivability and Metamorphism of Tidally Disrupted Giant Planets: the Role of Dense Cores

    On the Survivability and Metamorphism of Tidally Disrupted Giant Planets: The Role of Dense Cores. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/37 , archivePrefix =. 1211.1971 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/37 1971

  6. [7]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0224-z , abstract=

    2017 , title=. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0224-z , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0224-z 2017

  7. [8]

    1989 , title=

    IAUS , pages=. 1989 , title=

    work page 1989

  8. [9]

    Cannizzo, J. K. and Lee, H. M. and Goodman, J. , pages=. The Disk Accretion of a Tidally Disrupted Star onto a Massive Black Hole , journal=. 1990 , volume=

    work page 1990

  9. [10]

    doi:10.1086/117779 , abstract=

    1995 , title=. doi:10.1086/117779 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1086/117779 1995

  10. [11]

    2015 , title=

    Holoien,. 2015 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2486 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2486 2015

  11. [12]

    doi:10.1086/312840 , abstract=

    2000 , title=. doi:10.1086/312840 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1086/312840 2000

  12. [13]

    doi:10.1038/296211a0 , journal=

    1982 , title=. doi:10.1038/296211a0 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1038/296211a0 1982

  13. [14]

    doi:10.1086/423299 , journal=

    2004 , title=. doi:10.1086/423299 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/423299 2004

  14. [15]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/L32 , journal=

    2016 , title=. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/L32 , journal=

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/l32 2016

  15. [17]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044039 , journal=

    2010 , title=. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044039 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.044039 2010

  16. [18]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02853.x , abstract=

    1999 , title=. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02853.x , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02853.x 1999

  17. [19]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/24/244005 , journal=

    2013 , title=. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/24/244005 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/24/244005 2013

  18. [20]

    1976 , title=

    MNRAS , volume=. 1976 , title=

    work page 1976

  19. [21]

    and Chornock, R

    Gezari, S. and Chornock, R. and Rest, A. and Huber, M. E. and Forster, K and Berger, E. and Challis, P. and Neill, J. D. and Martin,. Natur , title=. 2012 , doi=

    work page 2012

  20. [22]

    and Cenko, S

    Pasham, D. and Cenko, S. and Levan, A. and Bower, G. and Horesh, A. and Brown, G. and Dolan, S. and Wiersema, K. and Filippenko, A. and Fruchter, A. and Greiner, J. and. ApJ , title=. 2015 , doi=

    work page 2015

  21. [23]

    1988 , title=

    Natur , pages=. 1988 , title=

    work page 1988

  22. [24]

    2009, title Clustering of luminous red galaxies - III

    2009 , title=. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x , journal=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x 2009

  23. [25]

    2014 , title=

    ApJ , author=. 2014 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/87 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/87 2014

  24. [26]

    1976 , title=

    Nature , author=. 1976 , title=

    work page 1976

  25. [27]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2081 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2081 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2081 2015

  26. [28]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty585 , abstract=

    2018 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty585 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty585 2018

  27. [29]

    2018 , title=

    Wang,. 2018 , title=

    work page 2018

  28. [30]

    2009 , title=

    Liu,. 2009 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L133 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/l133 2009

  29. [31]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx117 , journal=

    2017 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx117 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx117 2017

  30. [32]

    and Guillochon, J

    Lin, D. and Guillochon, J. and Komossa, S. and. A likely decade-long sustained tidal disruption event , abstract=. 2017 , volume=

    work page 2017

  31. [33]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw267 , abstract=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw267 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw267 2015

  32. [34]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1755 , abstract=

    2016 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1755 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1755 2016

  33. [35]

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx147 , abstract=

    2017 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx147 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx147 2017

  34. [36]

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L39 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L39 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/l39 2015

  35. [37]

    1996 , title=

    AJ , pages=. 1996 , title=

    work page 1996

  36. [38]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125 , journal=

    2016 , title=. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125 , journal=

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/125 2016

  37. [39]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/127 , journal=

    2016 , title=. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/127 , journal=

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/2/127 2016

  38. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx200 , abstract=

    2017 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx200 , abstract=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx200 2017

  39. [41]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/85 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/85 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/2/85 2015

  40. [42]

    2014 , title=

    Metzger, Brian and Vurm, Indrek and Hasco. 2014 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1922 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1922 2014

  41. [43]

    2016 , title=

    MNRAS , pages=. 2016 , title=

    work page 2016

  42. [44]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/166 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/166 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/166 2015

  43. [45]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/23 , journal=

    2014 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/23 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/23 2014

  44. [46]

    2018 , title=

    Collaboration,. 2018 , title=

    work page 2018

  45. [47]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1795 , journal=

    2014 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1795 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1795 2014

  46. [48]

    1994 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 1994 , title=

    work page 1994

  47. [49]

    2014 , author=

    MNRAS , title=. 2014 , author=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1922 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1922 2014

  48. [50]

    2016 , author=

    MNRAS , title=. 2016 , author=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1928 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1928 2016

  49. [51]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx033 , journal=

    2017 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx033 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx033 2017

  50. [52]

    Brown, J. S. and Kochanek, C. S. and Holoien, T. 2018 , title=

    work page 2018

  51. [53]

    2016 , title=

    Wyrzykowski, Łukasz and Zieliński, M and. 2016 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw213 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw213 2016

  52. [54]

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L5 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L5 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/l5 2015

  53. [55]

    2014 , title=

    Arcavi, Iair and. 2014 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/38 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/38 2014

  54. [56]

    2011 , title=

    Velzen, Sjoert and Farrar, Glennys and Gezari, Suvi and Morrell, Nidia and Zaritsky, Dennis and. 2011 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/73 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/73 2011

  55. [57]

    doi:10.1086/375802 , journal=

    2003 , title=. doi:10.1086/375802 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/375802 2003

  56. [58]

    2008 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 2008 , title=

    work page 2008

  57. [59]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/117 , journal=

    2012 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/117 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/2/117 2012

  58. [60]

    doi:10.1086/528738 , journal=

    2008 , title=. doi:10.1086/528738 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/528738 2008

  59. [61]

    doi:10.1086/590899 , journal=

    2008 , title=. doi:10.1086/590899 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/590899 2008

  60. [62]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/134 , journal=

    2011 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/134 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/134 2011

  61. [63]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L77 , journal=

    2009 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L77 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/l77 2009

  62. [64]

    1982 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 1982 , title=

    work page 1982

  63. [65]

    2002 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 2002 , title=

    work page 2002

  64. [66]

    1989 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 1989 , title=

    work page 1989

  65. [67]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/164 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/164 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/164 2015

  66. [68]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2347 , journal=

    2016 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2347 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2347 2016

  67. [69]

    1991 , title=

    ApJ , pages=. 1991 , title=

    work page 1991

  68. [70]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1547 , journal=

    2015 , title=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1547 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1547 2015

  69. [71]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/92 , journal=

    2012 , title=. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/92 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/92 2012

  70. [72]

    and Rossi, E

    Lodato, G. and Rossi, E. M. , volume=. MNRAS , title=. 2011 , doi=

    work page 2011

  71. [73]

    and Krimm, H

    Cenko, S. and Krimm, H. and Horesh, A. and Rau, A. and Frail, D. and Kennea, J. and Levan, A. and Holland, S. and Butler, N. and Quimby, R. and Bloom, J. and Filippenko, A. and. ApJ , title=. 2012 , doi=

    work page 2012

  72. [74]

    MNRAS , title=

    Brown, G and Levan, A and Stanway, E and Tanvir, N and Cenko, S and Berger, E and Chornock, R and Cucchiaria, A , volume=. MNRAS , title=. 2015 , doi=

    work page 2015

  73. [75]

    and Thomas, H

    Grupe, D. and Thomas, H. 1999 , journal=

    work page 1999

  74. [76]

    and Bade, N

    Komossa, S. and Bade, N. , volume=. The giant X-ray outbursts in. 1999 , journal=

    work page 1999

  75. [77]

    and Komossa, S

    Bade, N. and Komossa, S. and Dahlem, M. , volume=. Detection of an extremely soft X-ray outburt in the H2-like nucleus of. 1996 , journal=

    work page 1996

  76. [78]

    and Greiner, J

    Kommossa, S. and Greiner, J. , volume=. Discovery of a giant and luminous X-ray outburst from the optically inactive galaxy pair. 1999 , journal=

    work page 1999

  77. [79]

    and Saxton, R

    Esquej, P. and Saxton, R. D. and Komossa, S. and Read, A. M. and Freyberg, M. J. and Hasinger, G. , volume=. Evolution of tidal disruption candidates discovered by. 2008 , journal=

    work page 2008

  78. [80]

    and Ulmer, M

    Maksym, W. and Ulmer, M. and Eracleous, M. , volume=. ApJ , title=. 2010 , doi=

    work page 2010

  79. [81]

    and Nulsen, P

    Randall, S. and Nulsen, P. and Jones, C. and Forman, W. and Bulbul, E. and Clarke, T. and Kraft, R. and Blanton, E. and David, L. and Werner, N. and Sun, M. and Donahue, M. and Giacintucci, S. and Simionescu, A. , volume=. ApJ , title=. 2015 , doi=

    work page 2015

  80. [82]

    and Dokkum, P and Nugent, P

    Stern, D. and Dokkum, P and Nugent, P. and Sand, D and Ellis, R and Sullivan, M. and Bloom, J and Frail, D and Kneib, J and Koopmans, L and Treu, T. , volume=. ApJ , title=. 2004 , doi=

    work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.