Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent for Multimodal Understanding, Generation, and Editing

Canmiao Fu; Chen Li; Feng Wang; Ge Li; Jing Lyu; Zhipeng Huang

Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent for Multimodal Understanding, Generation, and Editing

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An 8B agent with external episodic visual memory retrieves the right past images across 20-turn multimodal dialogues more accurately than 32B all-context models while nearly cutting per-turn inference time in half.

desk verdict Solid modular memory agent with real efficiency wins on a synthetic long-horizon bench; the +8.2%/1.8× claims are credible inside that loop, transfer outside it is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08497 v1 pith:2KPPFJ6F submitted 2026-07-09 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

Feng Wang , Canmiao Fu , Zhipeng Huang , Chen Li , Jing Lyu , Ge Li This is my paper

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

keywords multimodalagentsepisodicvisualmemorylong-horizondialoguecross-turnretrievalimagegenerationandeditingreinforcementlearningunifiedmodelstool-augmented

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Unified multimodal models pack every past image and text into one growing context window. That works for short chats but fails on long sessions: visual tokens explode, and the model loses track of which earlier image a user is referring to. This paper argues the fix is cognitive structure, not bigger models. Incoming images are compressed into structured memory entries—tags, descriptions, thumbnails—stored outside the context window; a retrieval module then pulls back only the episodes needed for the current turn; an executive controller decides whether to understand, generate, edit, compose, or just chat. Trained with synthetic multi-turn dialogues that carry turn-level retrieval labels and refined by reinforcement learning, an 8B agent hits 91.4% retrieval accuracy over 20-turn English sessions, beats 32B baselines by 8.2 points, and runs about twice as fast. The same design is packaged as a tool-using harness with persistent memory, web access, and image tools, arguing that selective memory and modular control scale long-horizon multimodal agents better than raw parameter growth.

What carries the argument

Episodic Visual Memory (EVM) plus three specialists: the Perceptual Abstraction Engine writes structured image cards (tags, description, thumbnail); the Cognitive Retrieval Engine selects which past episodes matter for the current query; the Multimodal Executive Controller classifies the task and plans the action. Retrieval success, not caption similarity, is the training objective for abstraction and retrieval via staged supervised fine-tuning and DAPO reinforcement learning on programmatically generated dialogues.

What would settle it

Run the same 8B agent and the 32B all-context baseline on a held-out set of long multi-turn sessions written and annotated by humans (not the scenario engine), score turn-level image-retrieval exact match and generation faithfulness with independent human raters, and check whether the reported accuracy gap and latency advantage still appear on the hardest long-range and multi-image turns.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Long-horizon multimodal dialogue is limited less by model size than by the habit of replaying every historical image as tokens. Externalizing visual history into an episodic memory and retrieving only the relevant subset lets an 8B agent outperform much larger unified and all-context agents on cross-turn visual recall and generation quality while roughly halving inference time.

Load-bearing premise

Results on a fully synthetic 20-turn benchmark—built by the same scenario engine used for training, only with different seeds and topics—will carry over to real open-ended human multimodal conversation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Long multimodal chats need not keep every past image in the prompt; selective episodic recall can keep visual-token cost roughly constant as session length grows.
Task-specific training of abstraction and retrieval can beat simply scaling a monolithic multimodal model from 8B to 32B on cross-turn visual recall.
The same PAE–EVM–CoRE–MEC split can be deployed as a tool-calling assistant with persistent multi-session memory, web search, and generation/editing tools without redesigning the core loop.
Retrieval accuracy is the main bottleneck for multi-turn edit and understand quality; gains in retrieval multiply into generation scores.
Hard negatives and difficulty-stratified long-horizon benchmarks are necessary to expose failures that short-context multimodal tests miss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If synthetic scenario engines become the main source of retrieval labels, progress may overfit to engine-specific dialogue patterns unless human-authored long sessions become a standard second evaluation axis.
Decoupling memory writing from retrieval so each is rewarded only by downstream recall success suggests a general recipe for other modalities (video, audio, documents) where full history cannot fit in context.
Product-facing multimodal assistants that already juggle upload history, edits, and web assets may gain more from explicit episode cards and deterministic index resolution than from another jump in base model size.
When generation quality judges come from the same model family used to synthesize training dialogues, independent human or third-party scoring will be needed before claiming real-world superiority.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: this is a clean systems paper arguing that external episodic visual memory plus modular control beats stuffing every past image into a unified context. The 8B agent’s 91.4% 20-turn retrieval and ~half the latency of a 32B all-context baseline are the numbers people will quote, and the tables back them under the authors’ protocol.

What is actually new is the combination, not any single module. PAE writes structured cards (tags, description, thumbnail) into EVM; CoRE retrieves; MEC classifies and dispatches. The useful engineering move is training PAE against a frozen retriever with Jaccard reward so memory is optimized for recall, not caption metrics, plus a programmatic Unified Scenario Engine that finally gives turn-level retrieval labels. M2CA-Bench’s Full/Medium/Hard split and hard negatives are well designed for the claim they care about. Ablations are honest: SFT then RL on CoRE then RL on PAE each move the needle; text-only memories collapse on Hard; thumbnails matter. Baselines (BAGEL, all-context 8B/32B, multi-agent 8B/32B) are fair enough, and the GenArtist late-turn drift comparison supports the memory thesis. Code and harness are promised.

The soft spot is real but bounded. Train, test, and (for generation quality) judging all sit inside the same Gemini/Qwen scenario loop—disjoint seeds and topics, same inductive biases (forced long-range callbacks, fixed ontology). So the headline margins are established on that distribution, not on human-authored 20-turn chat. That does not kill the architectural point; it means you should not treat “structured memory beats parameter scaling” as settled practice until someone runs human sessions. Minor: free knobs (difficulty weight, filtering, memory schema) are under-specified for exact reproduction without the release.

Who it is for: people building long-horizon multimodal agents, memory for VLMs, or tool-using image edit stacks. Math is light (policy + Jaccard reward); data and citations look solid for a systems CV paper. I would send it to peer review. Worth reading if you care about context cost in interleaved understand/generate/edit; not a field reorganizer, but a credible efficiency path with a usable harness story.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent that externalizes visual history into an Episodic Visual Memory (EVM) and selectively reactivates relevant episodes via three modules: Perceptual Abstraction Engine (PAE), Cognitive Retrieval Engine (CoRE), and Multimodal Executive Controller (MEC). To obtain turn-level retrieval supervision, a Unified Scenario Engine programmatically generates 20-turn dialogues with ground-truth retrieval sets and difficulty tags; PAE and CoRE are then optimized with staged SFT+DAPO RL using difficulty-weighted Jaccard rewards. On the held-out M2CA-Bench (100 sessions × 20 turns), the 8B agent reports 91.4% English retrieval accuracy (Full), +8.2% over the strongest 32B multi-agent baseline, with larger gains on Hard turns and roughly 1.8× lower per-turn latency (23.1s → 12.7s). Generation quality (Gemini-3-Pro 0–10) tracks retrieval, and ablations attribute gains to SFT/RL stages and thumbnail+text memory over text-only memories. CMA-Harness is presented as a tool-augmented deployment of the same structure.

Significance. If the gains transfer beyond the synthetic distribution, the work offers a concrete, modular alternative to monolithic context scaling for long-horizon multimodal dialogue: external episodic visual memory plus selective retrieval can beat larger all-context models on both accuracy and latency. Strengths include a clear problem formulation (visual-context selection), fair same-session baselines (BAGEL, all-context 8B/32B, multi-agent 8B/32B), stratified Full/Medium/Hard evaluation, staged training ablations (Table 5), memory-representation ablations (Table 8), efficiency numbers (Table 6), and a released harness with code and project page. The contribution is primarily systems/empirical rather than theoretical, but it is a useful and timely design point for multimodal agents.

major comments (3)

Sec. 3.4, Fig. 3, Table 2: Training data, RL rewards, and M2CA-Bench all come from the same Unified Scenario Engine (Gemini user simulator + Qwen multi-agent answers + GT-justify), differing only by seed and topic list. The central claim that structured memory beats monolithic scaling for long-horizon multimodal agents is therefore established only inside this closed synthetic distribution. Without human-authored 20-turn sessions or live-user evaluation, transfer remains unproven and is load-bearing for the abstract/conclusion claim.
Sec. 5.2 and Table 4: Generation quality is scored by Gemini-3-Pro, the same model family used to synthesize scenarios and ground-truth retrieval sets (Sec. 3.4). Judge and data generator are not independent; this can inflate the apparent multiplier from retrieval to quality. An independent human or third-party VLM judge on a subset is needed to support the generation-quality claims.
Sec. 4 and Appendix C: CMA-Harness is a substantial part of the contribution (persistent multi-scope memory, 17-tool MEC, OpenAI-compatible serving) but is not evaluated with the same retrieval/quality/latency metrics as the core agent. Either report quantitative results on M2CA-Bench or open-ended workflows, or clearly demote it to a deployment note so the main claims rest only on the evaluated agent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No definitional circularity: 91.4% retrieval and +8.2% margins are empirical held-out comparisons, not fits renamed as predictions; shared Scenario Engine/Gemini family is a validity risk, not a by-construction reduction.

full rationale

This is an empirical systems paper, not a first-principles derivation. The load-bearing claim (8B agent 91.4% Full EN retrieval, +8.2% over 32B, 23.1s→12.7s) is measured on M2CA-Bench against independent baselines (BAGEL, All-Context 8B/32B, Multi-Agent 8B/32B) with fixed turn-level R* targets and identical sessions (Sec. 5.2–5.3, Tables 3–4). Train and test partitions are disjoint by seed and topic (Table 2; Sec. 3.4), so accuracy is not forced by construction: baselines score far lower on the same labels (e.g., BAGEL Hard EN 1.9%, Multi-Agent-32B Full EN 83.2%). SFT/RL (Jaccard on engine R*, then PAE rewarded via frozen CoRE) optimizes the stated retrieval objective; that is standard supervised/RL training, not a fitted parameter re-labeled as a prediction. No self-definitional equations, uniqueness theorems from the authors, or ansatz smuggled via self-citation appear. The real methodological weakness—training data, M2CA-Bench, and Gemini-3-Pro quality judging all flow from the Unified Scenario Engine / Gemini family (Fig. 3, Sec. 3.4, 5.2)—is shared-distribution / judge-independence risk, not circularity under this pass’s criteria. Score 1 only for that mild coupling; steps empty because no step reduces the central result to its inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 4 invented entities

This is an engineering/ML systems paper. Load-bearing content is architectural decomposition plus synthetic-data RL, not a closed-form derivation. Free parameters are training/reward knobs and generation hyperparameters. Axioms are standard ML and systems assumptions. Invented entities are the named modules and datasets the paper introduces; they have no independent physical evidence outside the system’s own benchmarks.

free parameters (4)

difficulty-weighted Jaccard reward weight w_d = 1.2 (hard/very hard); 1.0 otherwise
Set to 1.2 for hard/very hard turns and 1.0 otherwise in DAPO for CoRE; directly shapes the optimized retrieval policy.
SFT/RL data scale and filtering policy = 270×20 SFT train sessions; filtered hard subset for RL
270 train / 30 val sessions for SFT; RL filtered to incorrect, hard, and negative samples. These choices determine what the 8B modules learn.
image generation inference hyperparameters = 50 steps, CFG=4.0 (eval)
50 denoising steps and CFG scale 4.0 for final evaluation; Lightning 4-step config used only in data construction. Affects generation quality scores.
thumbnail + tags + description memory schema
Hand-designed structured entry format and PAE prompt constraints (≥5 tags, ≥100-word description). Ablation shows text-only memories fail on Hard; the schema is a design choice, not learned from first principles.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Only a small subset of historical images is relevant at each turn; visual-context selection can preserve task performance while minimizing |I*_i|.
Problem reformulation in Sec. 3.1; the entire architecture is built on this asymmetry between text history and visual history.
ad hoc to paper Turn-level retrieval annotations produced by the Gemini-driven Unified Scenario Engine (with GT-justify correction) are valid supervision for real cross-turn visual reference.
Sec. 3.4; without this, SFT+RL targets are not grounded in human dialogue behavior.
ad hoc to paper Gemini-3-Pro 0–10 scores are a faithful proxy for generation/editing quality in multi-turn multimodal dialogue.
Sec. 5.2 evaluation protocol; no human rating study is reported for Table 4.
domain assumption Standard VLM/LLM fine-tuning and DAPO-style RL improve retrieval policies when reward is Jaccard overlap with annotated retrieval sets.
Sec. 3.3 training pipeline; relies on established SFT+RL practice rather than a new learning theorem.

invented entities (4)

Episodic Visual Memory (EVM) with structured image cards
purpose: Externalize visual history as tags, descriptions, and thumbnails so full-resolution images need not stay in the context window.
Core memory substrate of the agent; independent evidence is only the paper’s own retrieval ablations, not an external physical measurement.
Perceptual Abstraction Engine (PAE) / Cognitive Retrieval Engine (CoRE) / Multimodal Executive Controller (MEC)
purpose: Decompose abstraction, retrieval, and task routing into independently trainable specialists.
Architectural invention of the paper (Fig. 2); success is measured only inside M2CA-Bench and harness demos.
Unified Scenario Engine and M2CA-Bench
purpose: Programmatically generate multi-turn dialogues with fine-grained retrieval labels and a held-out long-horizon evaluation set.
Addresses missing supervision in prior datasets; both train and test distributions are products of this engine.
CMA-Harness
purpose: Tool-augmented deployment with 17 tools, multi-scope persistent memory, and OpenAI-compatible serving.
Engineering wrapper around the same cognitive structure (Sec. 4, Appendix C); not independently validated on public agent leaderboards in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent for Multimodal Understanding, Generation, and Editing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KPPFJ6F

@misc{pith2026260708497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent for Multimodal Understanding, Generation, and Editing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KPPFJ6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08497}
}

read the original abstract

Recent unified multimodal models show a single architecture can jointly perform vision/language understanding and image generation/editing. However, they repeatedly feed all historical visual and textual inputs into a shared context window, limiting long-horizon multimodal dialogue due to visual token explosion and unreliable cross-turn referencing. We propose a Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent that externalizes visual information into an Episodic Visual Memory and selectively reactivates relevant episodes during reasoning. The agent consists of a Perceptual Abstraction Engine for structured visual abstraction, a Cognitive Retrieval Engine for cross-turn memory retrieval, and a Multimodal Executive Controller for autonomous task inference and action planning. To address the lack of turn-level retrieval supervision in existing datasets, we develop a Unified Scenario Engine that programmatically generates structured multi-turn conversations with fine-grained retrieval annotations, enabling reinforcement learning to optimize abstraction and retrieval policies. We also construct a long-horizon visual-dialogue benchmark stratified by difficulty to evaluate episodic visual recall. Our 8B agent achieves 91.4% retrieval accuracy over 20-turn sessions, surpassing 32B baselines by +8.2% while nearly halving per-turn inference time (23.1s -> 12.7s). We further present the Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent Harness (CMA-Harness), a tool-augmented deployment of the same cognitive structure integrating persistent multimodal memory, web access, image generation/editing/composition tools, and OpenAI-compatible serving. Structured memory and modular decision-making offer a more scalable, efficient paradigm for long-horizon multimodal agents than monolithic parameter scaling. Code: https://github.com/caseclose/cma-harness ; Project page: https://caseclose.github.io/cma-harness/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08497 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** End-to-end pipeline of the proposed Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent. Each incoming image passes through the Perceptual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Closed-loop Unified Scenario Engine for structured multi-turn scenario construction. A Gemini-based user simulator samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Qualitative comparison between the baseline and our method on multi-turn visual understanding, generation, and editing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Example Dialogue 1. A long-horizon multimodal interaction containing image generation, editing, topic switching, and visual question answering. [24] Zhiliang Peng, Wenhui Wang, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Shaohan Huang, Shuming Ma, and Furu Wei. Kosmos-2: Grounding multimodal …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Example Dialogue 2. A dialogue emphasizing environmental transformations, long-range recall, and stable visual consistency. Dialogue 3 Dialogue 3 Create an image of a vintage watch shop facade with dark wood trim and a display of antique clocks. Show a wide angle view …

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Example Dialogue 3. A complex interaction involving object insertion, cross-scene composition, and detailed visual comparison across distant turns. and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Proces…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[2]

Qwen Technical Report

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xi- aodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[3]

Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understand- ing, localization, text reading, and beyond

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understand- ing, localization, text reading, and beyond. 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[5]

In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18392–18402, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models

Chameleon Team. Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818, 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[7]

Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

Chaorui Deng et al. Emerging properties in unified multi- modal pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683, 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[8]

Videoagent: A memory-augmented multi- modal agent for video understanding

Yue Fan, Xiaojian Ma, Rujie Wu, Yuntao Du, Jiaqi Li, Zhi Gao, and Qing Li. Videoagent: A memory-augmented multi- modal agent for video understanding. InEuropean Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 75–92. Springer, 2024

work page 2024

Show all 45 references

[9]

Multi-modal agent tuning: Building a vlm-driven agent for efficient tool usage.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15606, 2024

Zhi Gao, Bofei Zhang, Pengxiang Li, Xiaojian Ma, Tao Yuan, Yue Fan, Yuwei Wu, Yunde Jia, Song-Chun Zhu, and Qing Li. Multi-modal agent tuning: Building a vlm-driven agent for efficient tool usage.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15606, 2024

2024 arXiv
[10]

Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework

Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Jinlin Wang, Ceyao Zhang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. InThe twelfth international conference on learning representa...

2023
[11]

Talkphoto: A versatile training-free conversa- tional assistant for intelligent image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01915, 2026

Yujie Hu et al. Talkphoto: A versatile training-free conversa- tional assistant for intelligent image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01915, 2026

2026
[12]

Wegen: A unified model for interac- tive multimodal generation as we chat

Zhipeng Huang, Shaobin Zhuang, Canmiao Fu, Binxin Yang, Ying Zhang, Chong Sun, Zhizheng Zhang, Yali Wang, Chen Li, and Zheng-Jun Zha. Wegen: A unified model for interac- tive multimodal generation as we chat. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Confere...

2025
[13]

Synapse: Empowering llm agents with episodic-semantic memory via spreading activation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02744, 2026

Hanqi Jiang et al. Synapse: Empowering llm agents with episodic-semantic memory via spreading activation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02744, 2026

2026
[14]

Videomem: Enhancing ultra-long video under- standing via adaptive memory management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04540, 2025

Hongbo Jin, Qingyuan Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Yang Liu, and Sijie Cheng. Videomem: Enhancing ultra-long video under- standing via adaptive memory management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04540, 2025

2025
[15]

Mmctagent: Multi-modal critical thinking agent framework for complex visual reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18358, 2024

Somnath Kumar, Yash Gadhia, Tanuja Ganu, and Akshay Nambi. Mmctagent: Multi-modal critical thinking agent framework for complex visual reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18358, 2024

2024 arXiv
[16]

Camel: Com- municative agents for” mind” exploration of large language model society

Guohao Li, Hasan Abed Al Abbas Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. Camel: Com- municative agents for” mind” exploration of large language model society. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

2023
[17]

Blip- 2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip- 2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023

2023
[18]

Iterative trajectory exploration for multi- modal agents

Pengxiang Li et al. Iterative trajectory exploration for multi- modal agents. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

2025
[19]

Llava-next: Improved reason- ing, ocr, and world knowledge, 2024

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. Llava-next: Improved reason- ing, ocr, and world knowledge, 2024

2024
[20]

Agent0- vl: Exploring self-evolving agent for tool-integrated vision- language reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19900, 2025

Jiaqi Liu, Kaiwen Xiong, Peng Xia, Yiyang Zhou, Haonian Ji, Lu Feng, Siwei Han, Mingyu Ding, and Huaxiu Yao. Agent0- vl: Exploring self-evolving agent for tool-integrated vision- language reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19900, 2025

2025
[21]

Seeing, listening, remem- bering, and reasoning: A multimodal agent with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09736, 2025

Lin Long, Yichen He, Wentao Ye, Yiyuan Pan, Yuan Lin, Hang Li, Junbo Zhao, and Wei Li. Seeing, listening, remem- bering, and reasoning: A multimodal agent with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09736, 2025

2025
[22]

Janusflow: Harmonizing autoregression and rectified flow for unified multimodal understanding and generation

Yiyang Ma et al. Janusflow: Harmonizing autoregression and rectified flow for unified multimodal understanding and generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

2025
[23]

night mode

Siru Ouyang, Jun Yan, I Hsu, Yanfei Chen, Ke Jiang, Zifeng Wang, Rujun Han, Long T Le, Samira Daruki, Xiangru Tang, et al. Reasoningbank: Scaling agent self-evolving with rea- soning memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25140, 2025. 13 Qwen BaselineOursQwen BaselineQwen BaselineOu...

2025 arXiv
[24]

Kosmos-2: Ground- ing multimodal large language models to the world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14824, 2023

Zhiliang Peng, Wenhui Wang, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Shaohan Huang, Shuming Ma, and Furu Wei. Kosmos-2: Ground- ing multimodal large language models to the world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14824, 2023

2023 arXiv
[25]

Chatdev: Communicative agents for software devel- opment

Chen Qian, Wei Liu, Hongzhang Liu, Nuo Chen, Yufan Dang, Jiahao Li, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Xin Cong, et al. Chatdev: Communicative agents for software devel- opment. InProceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume ...

2024
[26]

quiet" and

Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dess `ı, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, 14 Dialogue 2Dialogue 2 Create a realistic image of a vast African savanna during the day with a pride of lionsresting under an acacia tree. Now change the lightin...

2024
[27]

Unilip: Adapting clip for unified multimodal understanding, generation and editing

Hao Tang, Chenwei Xie, Xiaoyi Bao, Tingyu Weng, Pandeng Li, Yun Zheng, and Liwei Wang. Unilip: Adapting clip for unified multimodal understanding, generation and editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23278, 2025

2025
[28]

Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean- Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

2023 arXiv
[29]

Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Mar- tinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth ´ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi`ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

2023 arXiv
[30]

Crea: A collaborative multi-agent framework for creative content generation with diffusion mod- els

Kavana Venkatesh et al. Crea: A collaborative multi-agent framework for creative content generation with diffusion mod- els. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

2025
[31]

Yanyun-3: Enabling cross-platform strategy game operation with vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12937, 2025

Guoyan Wang, Yanyan Huang, Chunlin Chen, Lifeng Wang, and Yuxiang Sun. Yanyun-3: Enabling cross-platform strategy game operation with vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12937, 2025

2025
[32]

Multimodal needle in a haystack

Hengyi Wang et al. Multimodal needle in a haystack. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2025

2025
[33]

Internvl3

Weiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lixin Gu, Hengjun Pu, Long 15 Cui, Xingguang Wei, Zhaoyang Liu, Linglin Jing, Shenglong Ye, Jie Shao, et al. Internvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18265, 2025

2025 arXiv
[34]

Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024

Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wang, Zhen Li, Qiying Yu, et al. Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024

2024 arXiv
[35]

Videoagent: Long-form video understanding with large language model as agent

Xiaohan Wang, Yuhui Zhang, Orr Zohar, and Serena Yeung- Levy. Videoagent: Long-form video understanding with large language model as agent. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 58–76. Springer, 2024

2024
[36]

Genartist: Multimodal llm as an agent for unified image gener- ation and editing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:128374–128395, 2024

Zhenyu Wang, Aoxue Li, Zhenguo Li, and Xihui Liu. Genartist: Multimodal llm as an agent for unified image gener- ation and editing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:128374–128395, 2024

2024
[37]

Qwen-image technical report, 2025

Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, Yuxiang Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zekai Zhang, Zhengyi Wang, An Yang, Bowen Yu, Chen Cheng, Dayiheng Liu, De- qing Li, Hang Zhang, Hao Meng, Hu Wei, Jingyuan Ni, K...

2025
[38]

Visual haystacks: A vision- centric needle-in-a-haystack benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13766, 2024

Tsung-Han Wu et al. Visual haystacks: A vision- centric needle-in-a-haystack benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13766, 2024

2024 arXiv
[39]

Show-o2: Improved native unified multi- modal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564, 2025

Jinheng Xie et al. Show-o2: Improved native unified multi- modal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564, 2025

2025 arXiv
[40]

Qwen3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025

An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, Chujie Zheng, Dayiheng Liu, Fan Zhou, Fei Huang, Feng Hu, Hao Ge, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jia...

2025 arXiv
[41]

Agentfold: Long-horizon web agents with proac- tive context management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24699, 2025

Rui Ye, Zhongwang Zhang, Kuan Li, Huifeng Yin, Zhengwei Tao, Yida Zhao, Liangcai Su, Liwen Zhang, Zile Qiao, Xinyu Wang, et al. Agentfold: Long-horizon web agents with proac- tive context management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24699, 2025

2025
[42]

Worldmm: Dynamic multimodal memory agent for long video reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02425, 2025

Woongyeong Yeo et al. Worldmm: Dynamic multimodal memory agent for long video reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02425, 2025

2025
[43]

Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476, 2025

Qiying Yu et al. Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476, 2025

2025 arXiv
[44]

Multi-turn consistent image editing

Zijun Zhou et al. Multi-turn consistent image editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2025

2025
[45]

Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023

Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, and Mo- hamed Elhoseiny. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. 16

2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[2] [2]

Qwen Technical Report

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xi- aodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understand- ing, localization, text reading, and beyond

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understand- ing, localization, text reading, and beyond. 2023

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18392–18402, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models

Chameleon Team. Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818, 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

Chaorui Deng et al. Emerging properties in unified multi- modal pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683, 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

Videoagent: A memory-augmented multi- modal agent for video understanding

Yue Fan, Xiaojian Ma, Rujie Wu, Yuntao Du, Jiaqi Li, Zhi Gao, and Qing Li. Videoagent: A memory-augmented multi- modal agent for video understanding. InEuropean Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 75–92. Springer, 2024

work page 2024