Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 299 references

A single Walk-on-Cubes Monte Carlo scheme solves nonisotropic fractional Laplace, Yukawa, and Helmholtz equations by sampling cube exits of an independent-component stable process.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 11:02 UTC pith:AAQORQ2R

load-bearing objection Solid, usable Monte Carlo package for the coordinate-sum fractional operator; the math is clean and the numerics match the theory under the stated gauge conditions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10528 v1 pith:AAQORQ2R submitted 2026-07-12 math.NA cs.NAmath.APmath.PR

Walk-on-Cubes Monte Carlo Simulation for nonisotropic fractional Laplace, Helmholtz, and Yukawa equations

Antti Rasila , Tommi Sottinen , Yaotong Yuan This is my paper
classification math.NA cs.NAmath.APmath.PR MSC 65C0535J0535Q4068U20
keywords α-stable Lévy processMonte Carlo methodnonisotropic fractional Laplace operatorHelmholtz equationYukawa equationWalk-on-CubesDuffin correspondenceFeynman–Kac
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a Monte Carlo method for the nonisotropic fractional Dirichlet problems that replace the classical Laplace, Yukawa, and Helmholtz equations. The driving operator is a sum of one-dimensional fractional Laplacians, so the associated process has independent identical stable components rather than isotropic jumps. Because of that structure, the natural local domains are L-infinity cubes, and the algorithm walks by sampling precomputed unit-cube exits and rescaling them. For positive potential (Yukawa) a Duffin lift adds an auxiliary coordinate whose cosine phase screens the solution; for negative potential (Helmholtz) a Feynman–Kac exponential reweights paths by accumulated exit time, provided the growth rate stays below the principal eigenvalue of the domain. The result is one GPU-friendly implementation that covers all three regimes, with manufactured Green-function and Fourier-mode benchmarks plus tests on non-convex and multiply-connected domains.

Core claim

The nonisotropic fractional Dirichlet problem A^α_x u − λu = 0 is solved by a Walk-on-Cubes Monte Carlo algorithm that uses the exit law of a rectilinear symmetric α-stable Lévy process. For λ > 0 the Yukawa equation is reduced by a Duffin correspondence to a pure fractional Laplace equation in one higher dimension; for λ < 0 the Helmholtz equation is recovered by Feynman–Kac reweighting with the accumulated cube-exit time, under the spectral gauge condition −λ < λ_1(D).

What carries the argument

Walk-on-Cubes (WoC): at each interior point the algorithm takes the largest axis-aligned cube of radius equal to the L^∞ distance to the exterior, draws a precomputed unit-cube exit (position and time), and rescales by the self-similarity X_ct =^d c^{1/α} X_t; regime-dependent payoffs then apply either the Duffin cosine factor or the Feynman–Kac exponential.

Load-bearing premise

In the Helmholtz regime the method needs both that the discrete accumulated cube-exit time converges to the true exit time and that the growth rate stays below the principal eigenvalue of the domain; those spectral and geometric assumptions are imported rather than re-proved for every domain used in the numerics.

What would settle it

Run the one-dimensional Helmholtz manufactured solution cos(kx) with |λ| / λ_1(D) increased past 1 and check whether the Monte Carlo mean and variance remain finite and match the exact cosine; blow-up or systematic bias would refute the gauge claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Laplace, Yukawa and Helmholtz fractional problems with independent-component operators can share one precomputed jump pool and one parallel GPU kernel.
  • Principal eigenvalues of rectilinear stable processes become practical diagnostic quantities obtainable from the same WoC survival curves used for Helmholtz solves.
  • Curvilinear and multiply-connected domains are handled without body-fitted meshes by measuring only L^∞ distance to the exterior.
  • Heavy-tailed exit locations force exterior data to grow slowly enough for the Monte Carlo second moment to stay finite.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cube-exit pool could be reused for other coordinate-sum nonlocal operators whose generators factor into independent one-dimensional Lévy processes.
  • Near-critical Helmholtz runs will need branching or importance sampling once the single-particle Feynman–Kac weight ceases to have finite variance.
  • The method supplies a cheap surrogate for classical FEM on domains with re-entrant corners where mesh generation is expensive.
  • Tabulated Green-function benchmarks for the resolvent of the coordinate-sum operator may serve as standard tests for other nonisotropic fractional solvers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonisotropic fractional operator A^α_x = ∑_i −(−Δ_{x_i})^{α/2} and the associated exterior Dirichlet problems A^α_x u − λu = 0 for Laplace (λ=0), Yukawa (λ>0) and Helmholtz (λ<0). It proves a Duffin correspondence that lifts the Yukawa problem to a pure fractional Laplace problem in one extra dimension (Theorem 2.1), shows that a spatial Duffin lift fails for Helmholtz because of the heavy-tailed kernel, and replaces it by a Feynman–Kac representation with exponential weight e^{κ τ_D} under the gauge condition −λ < λ_1(D). Existence and the survival-tail characterisation of the principal eigenvalue λ_1(D) are established for the killed rectilinear α-stable process (Proposition 3.1). The constructive contribution is a Walk-on-Cubes Monte Carlo algorithm that samples precomputed unit-cube exits of the i.i.d.-component symmetric α-stable process, rescales them by self-similarity, and applies regime-dependent payoffs (oscillatory Duffin factor for Yukawa, exponential reweighting for Helmholtz). Numerical validation includes manufactured Green-function benchmarks, a 1-D Helmholtz Fourier-mode test, survival-tail eigenvalue diagnostics, and several 2-D/3-D geometric examples.

Significance. The work supplies a coherent probabilistic and algorithmic framework for a relatively under-studied nonisotropic fractional operator. The Duffin correspondence for Yukawa and the careful obstruction argument for Helmholtz are clean and useful; the survival-tail estimator for λ_1(D) is a practical tool that makes the gauge condition checkable. The Walk-on-Cubes construction with a precomputed jump pool is well adapted to GPU parallelism and extends the classical walk-on-spheres idea to the rectilinear stable setting. Strengths include explicit Fourier-symbol derivations, a unified algorithmic presentation, and extensive numerical checks (Green benchmarks, Monte-Carlo and jump-pool convergence, eigenvalue regression). If the exit-time approximation and gauge hypotheses hold for the domains of interest, the method offers a practical Monte Carlo solver for nonisotropic fractional Laplace/Helmholtz/Yukawa problems that is hard to obtain by standard mesh-based methods.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 3.3 and Proposition 3.2 claim that the discrete WoC accumulated time τ_ϵ converges in distribution to the true exit time τ_D as ϵ→0 (and N→∞). The argument invokes self-similarity and the strong Markov property together with “appropriate regularity conditions on the boundary and the fractional Poisson kernel” imported from Chen–Hu–Zhao [7], but no precise statement or proof of the limit is given for the domains used later (disk, spherical shell, missing-octant cube, doubly-connected square). Because the Helmholtz estimator reweights by exp(−λ τ_total), this convergence is load-bearing for bias control; a short rigorous justification or a clear statement of the geometric hypotheses under which it holds is needed.
  2. Proposition 3.1 assumes that D belongs to the geometric class for which the killed rectilinear stable process is irreducible and has a strictly positive Dirichlet transition density (citing [7]). The numerical examples include non-convex and multiply-connected domains (Cases 1–4) for which this class membership is not verified. Since the principal-eigenvalue existence, simplicity, and the survival-tail formula (3.7)–(3.8) rest on that assumption, and since the Helmholtz gauge condition is checked via the same survival profiler, the paper should either confirm that the cited theory covers these domains or restrict the Helmholtz claims to domains where the hypotheses are known to hold.
minor comments (5)
  1. The abstract and introduction emphasise Helmholtz and Yukawa, yet a substantial part of the numerical section (Cases 1–4) treats pure Laplace problems (λ=0). A brief remark clarifying that these serve as geometric stress tests of the common cube-exit kernel would improve balance.
  2. Notation for the operator switches between A^α_x and L^α = −A^α; a single consistent convention (or an explicit dictionary early in Section 3) would reduce cognitive load.
  3. Figures 1–4 and 9–12 are informative but lack quantitative colour bars or error-scale legends in the text description; adding them (or stating the colour-map ranges) would make the visual claims self-contained.
  4. The CMS sampling formulae (4.5)–(4.6) are standard; a one-line reference to the original Chambers–Mallows–Stuck paper is already present, but a short remark on numerical stability for α close to 0 or 2 would help practitioners.
  5. Typographical consistency: “Lévy” appears both with and without the accent; “Walk-on-Cubes” is sometimes abbreviated WoC without prior definition in the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: representations follow from the Lévy generator, Fourier symbol, and classical potential theory; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The core claims are not forced by definition, fitting, or self-citation chains. The nonisotropic operator A^α_x is defined as the sum of independent 1-D fractional Laplacians (Eq. 1.1–1.2), so the associated process is the rectilinear α-stable Lévy process by the Lévy–Khintchine formula; the exit representation u(x)=E_x[g(X_τ)] is the standard Kakutani formula for that generator. The Duffin correspondence (Theorem 2.1) is an elementary product calculation once the 1-D eigenfunction cos(λ^{1/α} y) is obtained from the Fourier symbol |ω|^α=λ (Proposition 2.1, derived directly). For Helmholtz the paper correctly discards spatial lifting (integral divergence for exponential modes) and invokes the classical Feynman–Kac formula under the gauge condition −λ<λ_1(D), whose existence and survival-tail characterization are proved from the killed semigroup (Proposition 3.1, citing external spectral theory). The Walk-on-Cubes rescaling (3.9) is the exact self-similarity of stable processes applied to L^∞ cubes. Manufactured Green-function benchmarks are independent of the Monte-Carlo estimator. Self-citations ([12,17,22,23]) supply only classical Duffin/Walk-on-Spheres background and are not used to justify the fractional nonisotropic constructions or the numerical claims. No parameter is fitted to the target solution and then re-presented as a prediction. Residual soft spots (imported irreducibility from [7], τ_ϵ oτ_D) are openly stated assumptions, not circular reductions. Score 1 reflects only the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on standard Lévy-process and fractional-calculus facts plus a few geometric hypotheses imported from the literature; no free parameters are fitted to produce the theoretical claims, and the only invented object is the algorithmic construction itself.

free parameters (2)
  • exit tolerance ϵ
    Numerical cut-off that stops a path when the local cube radius falls below ϵ; chosen by hand (typically 10^{-5}) and affects bias of the discrete exit-time approximation.
  • jump-pool size N_pool and micro-step Δt
    Empirical approximation of the unit-cube exit law; finite-pool and finite-step discretisation introduce controllable but non-zero bias that is studied numerically rather than eliminated.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Fourier symbol of the one-dimensional fractional Laplacian is |ξ|^α (Di Nezza–Palatucci–Valdinoci Prop. 3.3).
    Used to derive the plane-wave eigenfunctions and the Duffin correspondence (Section 2).
  • standard math Self-similarity X_{ct} =^d c^{1/α} X_t of symmetric α-stable processes and the strong Markov property.
    Gives the exact local rescaling law (3.9) that turns unit-cube exits into arbitrary-cube exits.
  • domain assumption Killed rectilinear stable process on a bounded domain of the geometric class of Chen–Hu–Zhao [7] admits a strictly positive Dirichlet transition density and a compact positivity-improving semigroup.
    Invoked for existence, simplicity and survival-tail characterisation of λ_1(D) (Proposition 3.1).
  • domain assumption Subcritical gauge condition −λ < λ_1(D) guarantees finite exponential moments of the exit time (Chen gaugeability theory).
    Required for the Helmholtz Feynman–Kac representation to be well-defined and for Monte Carlo variance to remain finite.
invented entities (1)
  • Walk-on-Cubes (WoC) algorithm with precomputed unit-cube jump pool no independent evidence
    purpose: Replace continuous path simulation of the nonisotropic stable process by discrete cube-exit jumps that are GPU-friendly and exact under self-similarity.
    The algorithmic object is new for this operator; independent evidence is the numerical agreement with manufactured solutions, not an external physical prediction.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21020 in / 3237 out tokens · 33166 ms · 2026-07-14T11:02:02.421126+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the nonisotropic fractional analogs of Laplace, Helmholtz and Yukawa equations. We provide a Duffin correspondence for the Yukawa equation and a Feynman--Kac reconstruction for the Helmholtz equation. The foundation of our analysis is the fact that the nonisotropic fractional Laplace equation is related to a symmetric $\alpha$-stable L\'evy process with independent identically distributed components. By using this relation we provide a Walk-on-Cubes algorithm that simulates the solutions of Helmholtz and Yukawa equations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10528 by Antti Rasila, Tommi Sottinen, Yaotong Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One-dimensional Yukawa Green comparison. The WoC Monte Carlo estimate is plotted against the exact Green function solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pointwise error for the one-dimensional Yukawa Green comparison. The absolute error is shown together with the Monte Carlo standard error. Figures 1–2 show that the Monte Carlo curve follows the analytic Yukawa Green profile, and the pointwise error remains on the same scale as the sam￾pling uncertainty. Case 12: Two-Dimensional Separable Yukawa Green Comparison. The second Green function comparison checks… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-dimensional separable Yukawa Green compar￾ison. The WoC Monte Carlo solution is shown beside the exact separable Green function solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pointwise error for the two-dimensional separable Yukawa Green comparison. The absolute error map is shown beside the Monte Carlo standard error map. Figures 3–4 show the expected agreement between the WoC estimator and the separable manufactured solution. The absolute error plot stays at the scale predicted by the Monte Carlo standard error, which supports the use of the Green function construction as a b… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lowest-ratio benchmark run in the helmholtz 1m profile, corresponding to 000 helmholtz 1m solution d1 with |λ|/λ1 = 0.15. The highest-ratio run corresponds to 003 helmholtz 1m solution d1, with |λ| λ1 = 0.65, λ = −1.0473823515023588, k = 1.0313438926461413, and random seed 20269508. Its errors were ∥uMC − uexact∥∞ = 0.052417647075, ∥uMC − uexact∥2 = 0.014328343996343449, with mean standard error 0.00821887… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Highest-ratio benchmark run in the helmholtz 1m profile, corresponding to 003 helmholtz 1m solution d1 with |λ|/λ1 = 0.65. Comparing the two runs shows the expected deterioration as |λ|/λ1 in￾creases toward the critical threshold. The low-ratio case remains highly ac￾curate, while the higher-ratio case exhibits visibly larger bias and variance, consistent with the amplifying Feynman–Kac weight in the Helmh… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Trusted dataset diagnostics for Monte Carlo con￾vergence and jump pool convergence. The eigenvalue survival tail validation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Trusted dataset diagnostics for principal eigenvalue estimation from survival tail regression. For the following four Laplace test cases, the common numerical parameters are α = 1.5, λ = 0, Nshots = 108 per grid point, ∆tmicro = 10−4 , ϵ = 10−5 . Case 1: 2D Doubly Connected Domain. This case investigates a non￾trivial topological domain containing an internal obstacle. • Domain: D = [−1, 1]2 \ [−0.5, 0.5]2… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Numerical solution contour for the 2D Doubly Con￾nected Domain. The bounded and oscillatory nature of g(x) effectively suppresses the variance blow-up induced by heavy￾tailed fractional jumps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical solution volume rendering for the 3D Missing Octant Domain. Case 3: 2D Unit Disk. Simulating the WoC algorithm on curvilinear do￾mains requires careful formulation of the maximal inscribed L∞ cube to main￾tain O(1) jump efficiency. • Domain: D = {x = (x1, x2) | x 2 1 + x 2 2 < 1} (Unit Disk). • Boundary Condition: g(x) = cos(x1) + sin(x2) for x ∈ Dc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Numerical solution for the 2D Unit Disk Domain. Case 4: 3D Spherical Shell. This case extends the geometric distance derivation to 3D and tests a bounded exponential boundary condition. • Domain: D = {x = (x1, x2, x3) | 0.5 < |x| < 1.0} (Spherical Shell). • Boundary Condition: g(x) = exp(−|x| 2 ) for x ∈ Dc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Slice rendering of the numerical solution within the 3D Spherical Shell Domain. References [1] J. Bertoin, L´evy processes, vol. 121 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bertoin , L\' e vy processes , vol

    J. Bertoin , L\' e vy processes , vol. 121 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    1996

  2. [2]

    Bogdan , The boundary H arnack principle for the fractional L aplacian , Studia Mathematica, 123 (1997), pp

    K. Bogdan , The boundary H arnack principle for the fractional L aplacian , Studia Mathematica, 123 (1997), pp. 43--80

    1997

  3. [3]

    Bogdan and T

    K. Bogdan and T. Byczkowski , Potential theory of S chr \"o dinger operator based on fractional L aplacian , Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 20 (2000), pp. 293--335

    2000

  4. [4]

    Bogdan and P

    K. Bogdan and P. Sztonyk , Estimates of the potential kernel and H arnack's inequality for the anisotropic fractional L aplacian , Studia Mathematica, 181 (2007), pp. 101--123

    2007

  5. [5]

    J. M. Chambers, C. L. Mallows, and B. W. Stuck , A method for simulating stable random variables , J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 71 (1976), pp. 340--344

    1976

  6. [6]

    Chen , Gaugeability and conditional gaugeability , Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 354 (2002), pp

    Z.-Q. Chen , Gaugeability and conditional gaugeability , Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 354 (2002), pp. 4639--4679

    2002

  7. [7]

    Z.-Q. Chen, E. Hu, and G. Zhao , Dirichlet heat kernel estimates for rectilinear stable processes , Journal of Functional Analysis, 288 (2025), p. 110812

    2025

  8. [8]

    Claus and M

    B. Claus and M. Warma , Realization of the fractional L aplacian with nonlocal exterior conditions via forms method , Journal of Evolution Equations, 20 (2020), pp. 1597--1631

    2020

  9. [9]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, and E. Valdinoci , Hitchhiker's guide to the fractional S obolev spaces , Bulletin des Sciences Math \'e matiques, 136 (2012), pp. 521--573

    2012

  10. [10]

    R. J. Duffin , Yukawan potential theory , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 35 (1971), pp. 105--130

    1971

  11. [11]

    Dybiec and K

    B. Dybiec and K. Szczepaniec , Escape from hypercube driven by multi-variate -stable noises: role of independence , Eur. Phys. J. B, 88 (2015), pp. Art. 184, 8

    2015

  12. [12]

    Q. Han, A. Rasila, and T. Sottinen , Efficient simulation of mixed boundary value problems and conformal mappings , Appl. Math. Comput., 488 (2025), pp. Paper No. 129119, 14

    2025

  13. [13]

    Kwa \'s nicki , Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional L aplace operator , Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 20 (2017), pp

    M. Kwa \'s nicki , Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional L aplace operator , Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 20 (2017), pp. 7--51

    2017

  14. [14]

    Kwaśnicki , Eigenvalues of the fractional L aplace operator in the interval , Journal of Functional Analysis, 262 (2012), pp

    M. Kwaśnicki , Eigenvalues of the fractional L aplace operator in the interval , Journal of Functional Analysis, 262 (2012), pp. 2379 -- 2402

    2012

  15. [15]

    A. E. Kyprianou, A. Osojnik, and T. Shardlow , Unbiased `walk-on-spheres' M onte C arlo methods for the fractional L aplacian , IMA J. Numer. Anal., 38 (2018), pp. 1550--1578

    2018

  16. [16]

    M. E. Muller , Some continuous M onte carlo methods for the dirichlet problem , Ann. Math. Statist., 27 (1956), pp. 569--589

    1956

  17. [17]

    Rasila and T

    A. Rasila and T. Sottinen , Yukawa potential, panharmonic measure and B rownian motion , Axioms, 7 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Riesz and B

    F. Riesz and B. Sz.-Nagy , Functional analysis , Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1955. Translated by Leo F. Boron

    1955

  19. [19]

    Ros-Oton and J

    X. Ros-Oton and J. Serra , The D irichlet problem for the fractional L aplacian: regularity up to the boundary , Journal de Math \'e matiques Pures et Appliqu \'e es, 101 (2014), pp. 275--302

    2014

  20. [20]

    Sato , L\' e vy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , vol

    K.-I. Sato , L\' e vy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , vol. 68 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. Translated from the 1990 Japanese original, Revised edition of the 1999 English translation

    2013

  21. [21]

    H. H. Schaefer , Banach Lattices and Positive Operators , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974

    1974

  22. [22]

    X. Yang, A. Rasila, and T. Sottinen , Walk on spheres algorithm for H elmholtz and Y ukawa equations via D uffin correspondence , Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 19 (2017), pp. 589--602

    2017

  23. [23]

    height 2pt depth -1.6pt width 23pt, Efficient simulation of the S chr\"odinger equation with a piecewise constant positive potential , Math. Comput. Simulation, 166 (2019), pp. 315--323

    2019

  24. [24]

    , TITLE =

    Adler, Robert J. , TITLE =. 1990 , PAGES =

    1990

  25. [25]

    Akhiezer, N. I. and Glazman, I. M. , TITLE =. 1993 , PAGES =

    1993

  26. [26]

    Electron

    Alili, Larbi , TITLE =. Electron. Comm. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , PAGES =. doi:10.1214/ECP.v7-1044 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/ecp.v7-1044 2002

  27. [27]

    [2022] 2022 , PAGES =

    Allahviranloo, Tofigh and Esfandiari, Armin , TITLE =. [2022] 2022 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85350-1 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85350-1 2022

  28. [28]

    and Hosseini, S

    Maleki Almani, H. and Hosseini, S. M. and Tahmasebi, M. , TITLE =. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2020.113262 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cam.2020.113262 2021

  29. [29]

    Multi-Mixed Fractional Brownian Motions and Orstein-Uhlenbeck Processes

    Almani, Hamidreza Maleki and Sottinen, Tommi , keywords =. Multi-Mixed Fractional Brownian Motions and Orstein--Uhlenbeck Processes , publisher =. 2021 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2103.02978 , url =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.02978 2021

  30. [30]

    Stochastic calculus with respect to

    Al. Stochastic calculus with respect to. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/aop/1008956692 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/aop/1008956692 2001

  31. [31]

    , TITLE =

    Arcones, Miguel A. , TITLE =. J. Theoret. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 1995 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02410116 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02410116 1995

  32. [32]

    Aurzada, Frank and Dereich, Steffen , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2009 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/09-AOP457 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/09-aop457 2009

  33. [33]

    Small deviations for a family of smooth

    Aurzada, Frank and Gao, Fuchang and K. Small deviations for a family of smooth. J. Theoret. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s10959-011-0380-5 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10959-011-0380-5 2013

  34. [34]

    Generalized multifractional

    Ayache, Antoine and L\'. Generalized multifractional. Fractals: theory and applications in engineering , PAGES =. 1999 , MRCLASS =

    1999

  35. [35]

    Communications in Mathematical Finance , VOLUME =

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan , TITLE =. Communications in Mathematical Finance , VOLUME =

  36. [36]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Campese, Simon and Poly, Guillaume , TITLE =. J. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.10.014 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.10.014 2014

  37. [37]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Malicet, Dominique and Mijoule, Guillaume and Poly, Guillaume , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/14-AOP992 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/14-aop992 2016

  38. [38]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Mishura, Yuliya and Valkeila, Esko , TITLE =. Statist. Decisions , FJOURNAL =. 2009 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1524/stnd.2009.1021 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1524/stnd.2009.1021 2009

  39. [39]

    Drift parameter estimation for fractional

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Morlanes, Jos. Drift parameter estimation for fractional. Statistics , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1080/02331888.2013.863888 , URL =

    doi:10.1080/02331888.2013.863888 2015

  40. [40]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Sottinen, Tommi and Viitasaari, Lauri , TITLE =. Mod. Stoch. Theory Appl. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.15559/15-VMSTA24 , URL =

    work page doi:10.15559/15-vmsta24 2015

  41. [41]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Sottinen, Tommi and Viitasaari, Lauri and Yazigi, Adil , TITLE =. Statist. Probab. Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2014.07.030 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spl.2014.07.030 2014

  42. [42]

    When does fractional

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Tikanm. When does fractional. Statist. Probab. Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2010.06.008 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spl.2010.06.008 2010

  43. [43]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Valkeila, Esko , TITLE =. Stat. Inference Stoch. Process. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s11203-013-9079-9 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11203-013-9079-9 2013

  44. [44]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Viitasaari, Lauri , TITLE =. Stat. Inference Stoch. Process. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s11203-014-9111-8 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11203-014-9111-8 2015

  45. [45]

    Azmoodeh, Ehsan and Viitasaari, Lauri , TITLE =. J. Theoret. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s10959-013-0495-y , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10959-013-0495-y 2015

  46. [46]

    Ba, Demba Bocar , TITLE =. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.37418/jcsam.3.2.2 , URL =

    work page doi:10.37418/jcsam.3.2.2 2021

  47. [47]

    , TITLE =

    Balan, Raluca M. , TITLE =. 2001 , PAGES =

    2001

  48. [48]

    Barbour, A. D. , TITLE =. Probab. Theory Related Fields , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01197887 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/bf01197887 1990

  49. [49]

    2005 , publisher=

    An Introduction to Stein's Method , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  50. [50]

    and Viens, Frederi G

    Barboza, Luis A. and Viens, Frederi G. , TITLE =. Electron. J. Stat. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/17-EJS1230 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/17-ejs1230 2017

  51. [51]

    Bardina, Xavier and Es-Sebaiy, Khalifa , TITLE =. Commun. Stoch. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2011 , NUMBER =. doi:10.31390/cosa.5.2.05 , URL =

    work page doi:10.31390/cosa.5.2.05 2011

  52. [52]

    , title =

    Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. , title =. Thiele Centre Research Report , number =

  53. [53]

    and Basse-O'Connor, Andreas , TITLE =

    Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. and Basse-O'Connor, Andreas , TITLE =. Bernoulli , FJOURNAL =. 2011 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3150/10-BEJ311 , URL =

    work page doi:10.3150/10-bej311 2011

  54. [54]

    and Corcuera, J.M

    Barndoff-Nielsen, O.E. and Corcuera, J.M. and Podolskij, M. , title =. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , volume =

  55. [55]

    and Pakkanen, Mikko S

    Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. and Pakkanen, Mikko S. and Schmiegel, J. Assessing relative volatility/intermittency/energy dissipation , JOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/14-EJS942 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/14-ejs942 2014

  56. [56]

    and Schmiegel, J

    Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. and Schmiegel, J. Brownian semistationary processes and volatility/intermittency , BOOKTITLE =. 2009 , MRCLASS =. doi:10.1515/9783110213140.1 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1515/9783110213140.1 2009

  57. [57]

    and Shephard, Neil , TITLE =

    Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. and Shephard, Neil , TITLE =. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00282 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00282 2001

  58. [58]

    and Sayit, Hasanjan , TITLE =

    Bayraktar, Erhan and Pakkanen, Mikko S. and Sayit, Hasanjan , TITLE =. Stoch. Anal. Appl. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1080/07362994.2014.858535 , URL =

    doi:10.1080/07362994.2014.858535 2014

  59. [59]

    2010 , PAGES =

    Beals, Richard and Wong, Roderick , TITLE =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511762543 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511762543 2010

  60. [60]

    and Es-Sebaiy, K

    Belfadli, R. and Es-Sebaiy, K. and Ouknine, Y. , title =. Frontiers in Science and Engineering (An International Journal Edited by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology) , volume =

  61. [61]

    1960 , Publisher =

    Yu.K. 1960 , Publisher =

    1960

  62. [62]

    Theory Stoch

    Bender, Christian and Sottinen, Tommi and Valkeila, Esko , TITLE =. Theory Stoch. Process. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =

    2007

  63. [63]

    Finance Stoch

    Bender, Christian and Sottinen, Tommi and Valkeila, Esko , TITLE =. Finance Stoch. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00780-008-0074-8 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00780-008-0074-8 2008

  64. [64]

    Advanced mathematical methods for finance , PAGES =

    Bender, Christian and Sottinen, Tommi and Valkeila, Esko , TITLE =. Advanced mathematical methods for finance , PAGES =. 2011 , MRCLASS =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18412-3_3 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18412-3_3 2011

  65. [65]

    , title=

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and Kogan, Leonid and Lo, Andrew W. , title=. Journal of Financial Economics , year=2000, volume=

    2000

  66. [66]

    Reproducing kernel

    Alain. Reproducing kernel. 2004 , Publisher =

    2004

  67. [67]

    , TITLE =

    Berman, Simeon M. , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1969 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1995248 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1995248 1969

  68. [68]

    , TITLE =

    Berman, Simeon M. , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1969 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1994804 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1994804 1969

  69. [69]

    , TITLE =

    Berman, Simeon M. , TITLE =. Ann. Math. Statist. , FJOURNAL =. 1970 , PAGES =. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177696901 , URL =

    doi:10.1214/aoms/1177696901 1970

  70. [70]

    , TITLE =

    Berman, Simeon M. , TITLE =. J. Appl. Probability , FJOURNAL =. 1970 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/s0021900200110666 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0021900200110666 1970

  71. [71]

    , TITLE =

    Berman, Simeon M. , TITLE =. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 1973/74 , PAGES =. doi:10.1512/iumj.1973.23.23006 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1512/iumj.1973.23.23006 1973

  72. [72]

    S\'eminaire de

    Bertoin, Jean , TITLE =. S\'eminaire de. 1987 , MRCLASS =. doi:10.1007/BFb0077634 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0077634 1987

  73. [73]

    1996 , PAGES =

    Bertoin, Jean , TITLE =. 1996 , PAGES =

    1996

  74. [74]

    , TITLE =

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and Kogan, Leonid and Lo, Andrew W. , TITLE =. Oper. Res. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1287/opre.49.3.372.11218 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1287/opre.49.3.372.11218 2001

  75. [75]

    Stochastic calculus for fractional

    Biagini, Francesca and Hu, Yaozhong and. Stochastic calculus for fractional. 2008 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-797-8 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-797-8 2008

  76. [76]

    Minimal variance hedging for fractional

    Biagini, Francesca and. Minimal variance hedging for fractional. Methods Appl. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , NUMBER =

    2003

  77. [77]

    Bingham, N. H. and Goldie, C. M. and Teugels, J. L. , TITLE =. 1987 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511721434 , URL =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721434 1987

  78. [78]

    Blumenthal, R. M. and Getoor, R. K. and Ray, D. B. , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1961 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1993561 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1993561 1961

  79. [79]

    , TITLE =

    Bogachev, Vladimir I. , TITLE =. 1998 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/surv/062 , URL =

    doi:10.1090/surv/062 1998

  80. [80]

    Studia Mathematica , VOLUME =

    Bogdan, Krzysztof , TITLE =. Studia Mathematica , VOLUME =. 1997 , NUMBER =

    1997

Showing first 80 references.