Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 58 references

VIOLET: High-Fidelity Violin Synthesis with Techniques and Dynamics

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that VIOLET, a latent-diffusion violin synthesizer, is the first neural system to render high-fidelity violin audio with explicit control over playing techniques and continuous dynamics, outperforming the previous neural…

desk verdict First real neural violin synthesis with explicit technique and dynamics control, but the fidelity claim is currently measured against the same commercial VI that produced its training data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07944 v1 pith:KS77KOUS submitted 2026-08-08 eess.AS cs.SD

Baotong Tian , Cynthia Lu , Vincent K.M. Cheung , Ting-Kang Wang , Jonathan Churchill , Zhiyao Duan This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords violinsynthesislatentdiffusionTransformerrectifiedflowplayingtechniquesdynamicscontrolMIDI-to-audioCSV-TD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that neural synthesis can take over violin rendering from sample libraries while giving musicians direct control over how each note is played. It introduces VIOLET, a latent-diffusion system—a model that learns to generate audio by denoising compressed representations—which takes MIDI notes, note-level playing techniques, and continuous dynamics curves as time-aligned inputs and outputs 48 kHz violin audio. The authors claim this is the first neural violin synthesizer with explicit, fine-grained control over both technique and dynamics, and that it outperforms the previous neural baseline while approaching a top commercial virtual instrument in technique clarity, naturalness, and dynamics following. If true, a composer could write a violin part in MIDI with technique and dynamics markings and hear a realistic rendering without dense keyswitches, sample libraries, or manual post-editing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a latent diffusion transformer trained with a rectified-flow objective, conditioned per frame by three time-aligned signals: a binary MIDI pianoroll, a 12-class technique pianoroll, and a normalized piecewise-constant dynamics curve derived from MIDI CC1 events. A fine-tuned DACVAE codec, a VAE version of a high-fidelity audio codec, supplies the latent space: its encoder turns 48 kHz mono violin audio into latents at 25 Hz, and its decoder reconstructs waveforms from generated latents. The Diffusion Transformer (DiT), a transformer that denoises audio latents, uses adaptive layer normalization (AdaLN) with zero-initialized modulation heads; each control signal is projected through its own embedder and contributes frame-specific scale, shift, and gate parameters on top of the diffusion-timestep embedding. At inference the velocity field is integrated with Euler steps under compositional classifier-free guidance, where the guided velocity is a sum of a MIDI-only term and technique and dynamics correction terms. This per-frame AdaLN injection is what makes technique and dynamics act locally on each 40 ms segment instead of globally on the whole rendering.

What would settle it

Render a set of real violin performances with aligned MIDI, technique labels, and dynamics curves, run VIOLET on them, and measure technique identification accuracy and RMS-dynamics Spearman correlation; if those numbers fall to near chance or near zero while the synthetic test set stays high, the control signal learned from the virtual instrument does not transfer to real acoustics, and the high-fidelity claim for real-world use collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that per-frame local conditioning is enough to make a latent diffusion transformer render a bowed string instrument faithfully and controllably. VIOLET encodes violin audio into a compact latent space with a fine-tuned DACVAE codec, then trains a Diffusion Transformer with a rectified-flow objective to predict the denoising velocity from a MIDI pianoroll, a 12-class technique pianoroll, and a piecewise-constant dynamics curve derived from MIDI CC1 events. The three conditions are injected frame-by-frame into every transformer block through adaptive layer normalization, so each 40 ms latent frame is shaped by the local technique and dynamics. In objective tests the system reports a lower FAD (Fréchet Audio Distance, measuring distributional similarity to real recordings) and much higher dynamics Spearman correlation than the previous neural baseline, and in listening tests it matches or approaches the commercial virtual instrument on technique clarity and naturalness while trailing slightly on audio quality and dynamics matching. The authors frame this as the first neural violin system to combine high audio quality with explicit control over technique and dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that 39 hours of audio rendered by one commercial virtual instrument is a faithful enough stand-in for real violin acoustics that a model trained on it will control technique and dynamics correctly on genuinely realistic performances; the paper itself notes that the test set is synthetic and the scores measure rendering correctness, not naturalness or generalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If VIOLET's claims hold, a producer can write a violin part in MIDI with technique keyswitches and CC1 dynamics and receive a complete, naturally articulated rendering without manually programming a sample library.
  • The same architecture should transfer to other continuously articulated instruments, since nothing in the conditioning design is violin-specific beyond the pitch range and technique labels; the paper's training recipe would need a new dataset for each instrument.
  • Dynamics controllability at the note level, with Spearman correlation 0.63 against the conditions and close to the virtual instrument's 0.67, suggests the model can realize written crescendos and diminuendos rather than only matching overall timbre.
  • Because the test set is synthetic, the strongest justified claim is rendering correctness; demonstrating transfer to real recordings would require new evaluation material, which the authors identify as future work.
  • The causal MIDI embedder and overlap-add windowing point toward a streaming, near-real-time synthesis loop, since inference already runs at 0.23 times real time on one GPU.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-identical objective results of the synth-only and full variants suggest the commercial virtual instrument's renderings, not the real recordings, are what teach technique and dynamics control; a direct test would train on the synthetic set alone and evaluate on a different virtual instrument or on real labeled performances.
  • Because the model's fidelity may be tied to its training instrument, a testable extension is cross-instrument conditioning: render a fixed MIDI input with several virtual instruments and see whether the same notes, techniques, and dynamics produce consistent control behavior, or whether the model has memorized one renderer's samples.
  • A stronger dynamics test than note- and segment-level Spearman correlation would be continuous RMS tracking over 40 ms frames; the current 1-second segmentation may hide within-note control failures.
  • A practical extension implied by compositional guidance is direct user weighting of technique versus dynamics adherence during sampling through the scalar guidance weights; the paper fixes both at 1, but the formulation allows trading one against the other.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents VIOLET, a two-stage latent diffusion framework for controllable violin synthesis. Stage 1 fine-tunes a DACVAE codec on violin audio; Stage 2 trains a Diffusion Transformer with a rectified-flow objective to generate latents from time-aligned MIDI notes, note-level playing techniques, and continuous CC1-based dynamics curves. The authors also introduce CSV-TD, a 39-hour synthetic dataset rendered from the Joshua Bell commercial virtual instrument with aligned symbolic controls. Objective evaluation on the CSV-TD test set reports lower FAD, better onset-pitch F1, and higher dynamics Spearman correlation than the ViolinDiff baseline, and a subjective study with 15 musicians finds VIOLET comparable to the Joshua Bell VI on several perceptual scales. The paper claims this is the first neural violin synthesis system to combine high audio quality with explicit technique and dynamics control.

Significance. If the reported results hold, the paper would be a useful contribution to expressive instrument synthesis: it introduces a new controllable-violin dataset, demonstrates a plausible conditioning architecture for note-level techniques plus continuous dynamics, and provides a direct comparison against a commercial virtual instrument. The release of code, demo, and dataset is a concrete strength, and the authors are honest about the synthetic nature of the test set in Section 5.2. However, the evaluation is largely closed-loop: training and test audio come from the same virtual instrument, the FAD reference set overlaps with training data, and the objective transcriber is co-authored and trained on synthetic data. The current evidence primarily supports controllable rendering of one commercial VI, not yet a general claim of high-fidelity real-violin synthesis.

major comments (5)
  1. [§5.2, Table 2] The FAD reference set is constructed from approximately 17 hours each of MOSA and MUSC, and both corpora are in the VIOLET (Full) training mixture (Section 5.1, curriculum ratios 60:20:10:10 and 40:10:25:25). Since FAD measures distributional distance to a reference embedding set, VIOLET is evaluated against audio it was trained on, while ViolinDiff was not. The FAD advantage in Table 2 (0.513 vs 0.668) is therefore not an unbiased measure of audio quality relative to an unseen target. Please recompute FAD on a held-out real-violin reference set disjoint from all training data and report bootstrap confidence intervals.
  2. [§5.2, Table 2] The dynamics Spearman correlation is computed on the CSV-TD test set, whose dynamics curves are exactly the CC1 inputs used to render the Joshua Bell VI that produced the training audio. A model trained on thousands of CSV-TD examples can learn the VI's near-deterministic CC1-to-RMS mapping, so ρ=0.631 primarily demonstrates fidelity to this specific virtual instrument's rendering behavior. The abstract's 'good dynamics control' should be qualified as demonstrated on synthetic renderings of one VI; an evaluation on real recordings with manual or independently estimated dynamics would be needed to support transfer.
  3. [§5.2] The timing-compensated ground truth applies hand-set pre-delays (30 ms for short articulations, 100 ms for long ones) to the VI and VIOLET outputs but leaves ViolinDiff on the original MIDI timing. Since these values are chosen to match VI pre-delay behavior and VIOLET is trained on VI-rendered audio, the onset-deviation comparison in Table 2 is biased in favor of VIOLET and VI. Report results both with and without compensation, or estimate onset offsets from the audio independently of assumed pre-delay values.
  4. [§5.2] Onset-pitch F1 is computed with VioPTT, a co-authored transcriber trained on the synthetic MOSA_VPT corpus that is also part of VIOLET's training data. If VioPTT's transcription decisions are tuned to the same rendering conventions that VIOLET learns from CSV-TD, the alignment metrics partly measure self-consistency rather than generalizable MIDI-audio alignment. The claims would be stronger with an independent transcriber or a small set of human-verified onsets.
  5. [Abstract and §6 vs §5.2] Section 5.2 states that the synthetic test set means the results 'should be interpreted as measures of basic rendering correctness ... rather than strong evidence of improved naturalness or generalization to real performances.' The abstract and conclusion, however, claim 'high-fidelity violin synthesis' and that VIOLET 'approaches a top commercial virtual instrument' without this qualification. The central claim should be restated to match the evidence, or the paper should add real-recording evaluation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (1)] The same symbol \tilde{\beta} is reused for the dynamics, MIDI, and technique modulation terms; using distinct superscripts such as \tilde{\beta}^{dyn}, \tilde{\beta}^{midi}, and \tilde{\beta}^{tech} would prevent confusion.
  2. [§4.1, Table 1] The abstract reports 39 h for CSV-TD, while the text says '6,108 MIDI-audio pairs totaling 35 hours' and Table 1 lists 35.4 h training plus 3.7 h test; please make the rounding consistent in a single sentence.
  3. [§5.3] The paired sign test p-values are reported across four rating dimensions with no multiple-comparison correction; report effect sizes or adjusted p-values to make the significance claims more robust.
  4. [Figure 2] The number of ratings contributing to each mean and confidence interval is not stated; add this information in the caption or text so readers can assess the precision of the subjective results.
  5. [§5.2] The dynamics evaluation threshold ('notes longer than 1 s with an internal normalized dynamics range above 0.1') should state its provenance, as it is a free parameter that can affect the reported Spearman correlation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the main evaluation loop is in-distribution and uses a co-authored transcriber, but the claims are not forced by construction and limitations are acknowledged.

full rationale

VIOLET is trained predominantly on CSV-TD, synthetic audio rendered by the Joshua Bell virtual instrument, and its objective test set is the held-out CSV-TD split from the same source. This is a generalization limitation, and the paper itself flags it in Section 5.2: "because the test set is synthetic, the evaluation may favor models trained primarily on synthetic data... These results should therefore be interpreted as measures of basic rendering correctness, particularly adherence to the input MIDI timing and pitch, rather than strong evidence of improved naturalness or generalization to real performances." This is not circular by construction: the training objective is rectified-flow velocity matching (Eq. 4), not the evaluation metrics, and the held-out split still requires the model to respond to unseen MIDI, technique, and dynamics combinations within the same rendering distribution. The FAD reference set is built from MOSA and MUSC, which are also used for training, so the FAD comparison may be optimistically biased, but FAD is not a fitted objective and the reference consists of real recordings. The use of VioPTT (Ref. 42), a co-authored transcriber trained on synthetic data, for onset-pitch F1 is a self-citation in the evaluation chain; however, it is not load-bearing for the central claims, which are also supported by subjective listening and by the comparison against the commercial VI. The dynamics Spearman correlation measures whether the output RMS follows the input CC1 curve; this is the intended controllability behavior, not a renamed training loss. Overall, no step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by definition or by fitted-parameter renaming, so the circularity score is low despite the acknowledged in-distribution evaluation issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the CSV-TD synthetic pipeline as a training and test foundation. The free parameters listed are hand-set choices in the evaluation and inference pipeline that materially affect the reported numbers. No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Onset pre-delay compensation = 30 ms (short articulations), 100 ms (long articulations)
    Hand-set delays applied to notated MIDI to construct timing-compensated ground truth for onset-pitch F1 and onset deviation on VIOLET and the VI baseline, but not ViolinDiff.
  • Compositional CFG guidance weights = w_tech = 1, w_dyn = 1
    Weights of the technique and dynamics guidance terms in Eq. (6); chosen without reported ablation, they influence how strongly conditions are followed.
  • Euler sampling steps = 30
    Number of rectified-flow integration steps at inference; affects generation speed and potentially audio quality.
  • Dataset curriculum sampling ratios = 60:20:10:10 then 40:10:25:25 (CSV-TD, MOSA_VPT, MOSA, MUSC)
    Hand-designed curriculum over synthetic and real data used to train the latent diffusion model; affects the balance between fidelity and controllability.
  • Dynamics evaluation segmentation threshold = notes >1 s and dynamics range >0.1 split at 1 s
    Rule used to segment long notes when computing the Spearman correlation between RMS and dynamics; different thresholds would change the reported dynamics controllability.
  • Technique assignment heuristics for CSV-TD = probabilistic, duration-based
    Labels in the new dataset were assigned by heuristics (short notes more likely spiccato/staccato/pizzicato, long notes more likely legato/trill/harmonic); this defines the ground truth for technique evaluation.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Joshua Bell commercial virtual instrument produces audio that is a faithful proxy for real solo violin performances.
    CSV-TD is rendered from this VI and serves as the main training and test source for technique and dynamics; if the proxy is poor, the controllability results do not transfer to real violin sound.
  • domain assumption VioPTT provides accurate technique-aware transcription of synthesized violin audio.
    Used to compute onset-pitch F1 and onset deviation on generated audio; developed by co-authors and trained with synthetic augmentation, so its errors could systematically bias the reported alignment metrics.
  • domain assumption A model trained on a curriculum of synthetic VI renders plus modest real data will generalize to expressive, real-world violin performances.
    The paper itself notes the test set is synthetic and that results should be read as rendering correctness rather than evidence of generalization to real performances (Section 5.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of VIOLET: High-Fidelity Violin Synthesis with Techniques and Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KS77KOUS

@misc{pith2026260807944,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: VIOLET: High-Fidelity Violin Synthesis with Techniques and Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KS77KOUS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07944}
}
read the original abstract

Neural synthesis for musical instruments has the potential to revolutionize current practices that use concatenative synthesis and a sample library. However, most research focused on piano synthesis and expressive performance generation; little work has been done on continuously articulated instruments like the violin, let alone rendering them with playing techniques and dynamics. We present VIOLET, a latent-diffusion framework for controllable violin synthesis, which uses a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) with rectified flow to synthesize high-fidelity audio from MIDI notes, playing techniques, and continuous dynamics. To train VIOLET, in addition to using a few existing datasets, we curate a new dataset named CSV-TD, which contains 39 h of 48 kHz synthetic audio and time-aligned annotations of MIDI notes, note-level techniques, and continuous dynamics curves. Objective and subjective evaluations show that VIOLET synthesizes violin performances with high technique adherence, accurate pitch and timing alignment, and good dynamics control. It outperforms the current state-of-the-art neural violin synthesis system and approaches a top commercial virtual instrument in terms of technique clarity, naturalness, and dynamics following.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    VIOLET: High-Fidelity Violin Synthesis with Techniques and Dynamics

    INTRODUCTION Audio synthesis for musical instruments aims to generate realistic performance audio from symbolic representations such as MusicXML or MIDI. Recent codec-based and transformer-based systems have substantially improved the expressiveness and perceptual fidelity of generated perfor- mances [1], but this progress has centered largely on piano. P...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    RELATED WORK 2.1 Neural Music Performance Rendering Neural music performance rendering has advanced rapidly in recent years, but most high-performing systems remain centered on piano. Recent approaches span CNN- and Transformer-based score-to-audio models [13,14], DDSP- based synthesis [15, 16], state-space models [17], and the integration of neural codec...

    work page

  3. [3]

    METHODOLOGY In this section, we introduce the proposed VIOLET frame- work for high-fidelity violin synthesis with control over techniques and dynamics. As illustrated in Figure 1, the system consists of two stages: fine-tuning a DACV AE model to encode violin audio into a compact latent space, and training a Latent Diffusion Model (LDM) to synthesize the ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We there- fore constructCSV-TDwith a commercial virtual instru- ment, obtaining high-quality audio with the exact symbolic controls used for rendering

    DATASETS To the best of our knowledge, no public violin dataset pro- vides aligned MIDI notes, note-level techniques, and con- tinuous dynamics controls required by our task. We there- fore constructCSV-TDwith a commercial virtual instru- ment, obtaining high-quality audio with the exact symbolic controls used for rendering. This section describes CSV- TD...

    work page

  5. [5]

    For ob- jective evaluation, we use the CSV-TD test set

    EXPERIMENTS 5.1 Experimental Setup Dataset.We use all the training corpora (two real datasets and two synthetic datasets) to fine-tune the DACV AE model and to train the main latent diffusion model. For ob- jective evaluation, we use the CSV-TD test set. While the CSV-TD training set contains 12 technique labels and we use all of them for training, here w...

    work page

  6. [6]

    ViolinDiff appears only in the multi-technique setting

    VIOLET slightly underperforms the VI system on au- dio quality (p <0.05) and dynamics matching (p <0.01), Technique Clarity Naturalness Audio Quality Dynamics Match 1 2 3 4 5Mean Rating (1-5) Single Technique Evaluation Technique Clarity Naturalness Audio Quality 1 2 3 4 5Mean Rating (1-5) Multiple Technique Evaluation VIOLET (Full) VI ViolinDiff Figure 2...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The proposed latent diffusion generation system renders violin audio with explicit control over both techniques and dynamics while preserving strong pitch and timing alignment

    CONCLUSION In this paper, we presentedVIOLET, a high-quality, con- trollable violin synthesis framework, together withCSV- TD, a new 48 kHz violin solo performance dataset with time-aligned MIDI notes, technique labels, and continuous dynamics curves. The proposed latent diffusion generation system renders violin audio with explicit control over both tech...

    work page

  8. [8]

    For the coding and implemen- tation phase, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini were used to assist in writing, refactoring, and debugging code

    AI USAGE STATEMENT During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized AI-assisted technologies to support both model develop- ment and paper preparation. For the coding and implemen- tation phase, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini were used to assist in writing, refactoring, and debugging code. For the preparation of the manuscript, OpenAI Ch...

    work page

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was partially supported by National Science Foundation grant No. 2222129. We thank Yang Yi for his help with batch synthesis of violin audio using a virtual in- strument in Kontakt. We sincerely thank the 15 musicians who voluntarily participated ...

  2. [10]

    MIDI-V ALLE: Improving expressive piano performance synthesis through neural codec lan- guage modelling,

    J. Tang, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Yamagishi, G. Wiggins, and G. Fazekas, “MIDI-V ALLE: Improving expressive piano performance synthesis through neural codec lan- guage modelling,” inProc. of the 26th Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., 2025, pp. 623–630

    2025

  3. [11]

    Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the MAESTRO dataset,

    C. Hawthorne, A. Stasyuk, A. Roberts, I. Simon, C.- Z. A. Huang, S. Dieleman, E. Elsen, J. Engel, and D. Eck, “Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the MAESTRO dataset,” inProc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    ASAP: A dataset of aligned scores and performances for piano transcription,

    F. Foscarin, A. McLeod, P. Rigaux, F. Jacquemard, and M. Sakai, “ASAP: A dataset of aligned scores and performances for piano transcription,” inProc. of the 21st Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., 2020, pp. 534–541

    2020

  5. [13]

    ATEPP: A dataset of automat- ically transcribed expressive piano performance,

    H. Zhang, J. Tang, S. R. Rafee, S. Dixon, G. Fazekas, and G. A. Wiggins, “ATEPP: A dataset of automat- ically transcribed expressive piano performance,” in Proc. of the 23rd Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., 2022, pp. 446–453

    2022

  6. [14]

    Physical modeling using digital waveg- uides,

    J. O. Smith, “Physical modeling using digital waveg- uides,”Computer Music Journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 74–91, 1992

    1992

  7. [15]

    Towards expressive instrument synthesis through smooth frame- by-frame reconstruction: From string to woodwind,

    S. Wager, L. Chen, M. Kim, and C. Raphael, “Towards expressive instrument synthesis through smooth frame- by-frame reconstruction: From string to woodwind,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    TechSinger: Tech- nique controllable multilingual singing voice synthesis via flow matching,

    W. Guo, Y . Zhang, C. Pan, R. Huang, L. Tang, R. Li, Z. Hong, Y . Wang, and Z. Zhao, “TechSinger: Tech- nique controllable multilingual singing voice synthesis via flow matching,” inProc. the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    ControlSpeech: Towards simultaneous and indepen- dent zero-shot speaker cloning and zero-shot language style control,

    S. Ji, Q. Chen, W. Wang, J. Zuo, M. Fang, Z. Jiang, H. Huang, Z. Wang, X. Cheng, S. Zheng, and Z. Zhao, “ControlSpeech: Towards simultaneous and indepen- dent zero-shot speaker cloning and zero-shot language style control,” inProc. of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association...

    2025

  10. [18]

    Spontaneous style text-to- speech synthesis with controllable spontaneous behav- iors based on language models,

    W. Li, P. Yang, Y . Zhong, Y . Zhou, Z. Wang, Z. Wu, X. Wu, and H. Meng, “Spontaneous style text-to- speech synthesis with controllable spontaneous behav- iors based on language models,” inProc. Interspeech, 2024, pp. 1785–1789

    2024

  11. [19]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers,

    W. Peebles and S. Xie, “Scalable diffusion models with transformers,” inProc. the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023, pp. 4195–4205

    2023

  12. [20]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow,

    X. Liu, C. Gong, and Q. Liu, “Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow,” inProc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Flow matching for generative modeling,

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le, “Flow matching for generative modeling,” inProc. International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    PerformanceNet: Score-to- audio music generation with multi-band convolutional residual network,

    B. Wang and Y .-H. Yang, “PerformanceNet: Score-to- audio music generation with multi-band convolutional residual network,” inProc. the AAAI Conference on Ar- tificial Intelligence, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Deep Performer: Score-to-audio music performance synthesis,

    H.-W. Dong, C. Zhou, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and J. McAuley, “Deep Performer: Score-to-audio music performance synthesis,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP), 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    MIDI-DDSP: Detailed control of musical performance via hierarchical modeling,

    Y . Wu, E. Manilow, Y . Deng, R. Swavely, K. Kast- ner, T. Cooijmans, A. Courville, C.-Z. A. Huang, and J. Engel, “MIDI-DDSP: Detailed control of musical performance via hierarchical modeling,” inProc. In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Differentiable piano model for MIDI-to-audio performance synthe- sis,

    L. Renault, R. Mignot, and A. Roebel, “Differentiable piano model for MIDI-to-audio performance synthe- sis,” inProc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Piano-SSM: Diagonal state space models for efficient MIDI-to-raw audio synthesis,

    D. Dallinger, M. Bittner, D. Schnöll, M. Wess, and A. Jantsch, “Piano-SSM: Diagonal state space models for efficient MIDI-to-raw audio synthesis,” inProc. of the 28th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Corpus-based concatenative synthesis,

    D. Schwarz, “Corpus-based concatenative synthesis,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 92–104, 2007

    2007

  20. [28]

    Ex- pressive concatenative synthesis by reusing samples from real performance recordings,

    E. Maestre, R. Ramírez, S. Kersten, and X. Serra, “Ex- pressive concatenative synthesis by reusing samples from real performance recordings,”Computer Music Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 23–42, 2009

    2009

  21. [29]

    Data-driven concatenative sound synthe- sis,

    D. Schwarz, “Data-driven concatenative sound synthe- sis,” Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris 6, 2004

    2004

  22. [30]

    A review of string instrument synthesis methods for use in interac- tive systems,

    Y . Zhang, S. von Mammen, and C. Weiß, “A review of string instrument synthesis methods for use in interac- tive systems,”Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, vol. 9, no. 1, 2026

    2026

  23. [31]

    The synthesis of complex audio spectra by means of frequency modulation,

    J. Chowning, “The synthesis of complex audio spectra by means of frequency modulation,”Journal of the Au- dio Engineering Society, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 526–534, 1973

    1973

  24. [32]

    Methods for multiple wavetable synthesis of musical instru- ment tones,

    A. Horner, J. Beauchamp, and L. Haken, “Methods for multiple wavetable synthesis of musical instru- ment tones,”Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 336–356, 1993

    1993

  25. [33]

    mi-gen∼: An efficient and accessible mass-interaction sound synthesis tool- box,

    J. Leonard and J. Villeneuve, “mi-gen∼: An efficient and accessible mass-interaction sound synthesis tool- box,” inSMC 2019-16th Sound & Music Computing Conference, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Efficient sim- ulation of the bowed string in modal form,

    R. Russo, M. Ducceschi, and S. Bilbao, “Efficient sim- ulation of the bowed string in modal form,” inProc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    A refined bow–string interaction model considering hysteresis,

    E. Matusiak, V . Chatziioannou, and M. van Walstijn, “A refined bow–string interaction model considering hysteresis,”Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 035014, 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    DDSP-based neural wave- form synthesis of polyphonic guitar performance from string-wise MIDI input,

    N. Jonason, X. Wang, E. Cooper, L. Juvela, B. L. T. Sturm, and J. Yamagishi, “DDSP-based neural wave- form synthesis of polyphonic guitar performance from string-wise MIDI input,” inProc. of the 27th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    ViolinDiff: En- hancing expressive violin synthesis with pitch bend conditioning,

    D. Kim, H.-W. Dong, and D. Jeong, “ViolinDiff: En- hancing expressive violin synthesis with pitch bend conditioning,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    AudioLDM: Text- to-audio generation with latent diffusion models,

    H. Liu, Z. Chen, Y . Yuan, X. Mei, X. Liu, D. Mandic, W. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, “AudioLDM: Text- to-audio generation with latent diffusion models,” in Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion,

    Z. Evans, C. Carr, J. Taylor, S. H. Hawley, and J. Pons, “Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion,” in Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Audiobox: Unified audio generation with natural language prompts,

    A. Vyas, B. Shi, M. Le, A. Tjandra, Y .-C. Wu, B. Guo, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, R. Adkins, W. Ngan, J. Wang, I. Cruz, B. Akula, A. Akinyemi, B. Ellis, R. Moritz, Y . Yungster, A. Rakotoarison, L. Tan, C. Summers, C. Wood, J. Lane, M. Williamson, and W.-N. Hsu, “Audiobox: Unified au...

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    FlashAudio: Rectified flows for fast and high-fidelity text-to-audio generation,

    H. Liu, J. Wang, R. Huang, Y . Liu, H. Lu, Z. Zhao, and W. Xue, “FlashAudio: Rectified flows for fast and high-fidelity text-to-audio generation,” inProc. of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    TangoFlux: Super fast and faithful text to au- dio generation with flow matching and CLAP-ranked preference optimization,

    C.-Y . Hung, N. Majumder, Z. Kong, A. Mehrish, A. A. Bagherzadeh, C. Li, R. Valle, B. Catanzaro, and S. Po- ria, “TangoFlux: Super fast and faithful text to au- dio generation with flow matching and CLAP-ranked preference optimization,” inProc. International Con- ference on Le...

    2026

  35. [43]

    High-fidelity audio compression with im- proved RVQGAN,

    R. Kumar, P. Seetharaman, A. Luebs, I. Kumar, and K. Kumar, “High-fidelity audio compression with im- proved RVQGAN,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 36, pp. 27 980– 27 993, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    DACV AE-watermarked,

    AI at Meta, “DACV AE-watermarked,” https://huggingf ace.co/facebook/dacvae-watermarked, 2025, Hugging Face model repository, accessed July 20, 2026

    2025

  37. [45]

    MuseControlLite: Multifunctional music generation with lightweight conditioners,

    F.-D. Tsai, S.-L. Wu, W. Lee, S.-P. Yang, B.-R. Chen, H.-C. Cheng, and Y .-H. Yang, “MuseControlLite: Multifunctional music generation with lightweight conditioners,” inProc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2025

    2025

  38. [46]

    MID-FiLD: MIDI dataset for fine-level dy- namics,

    J. Ryu, S. Rhyu, H.-G. Yoon, E. Kim, J. Y . Yang, and T. Kim, “MID-FiLD: MIDI dataset for fine-level dy- namics,” inProc. the AAAI Conference on Artificial In- telligence, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Kontakt 8,

    Native Instruments, “Kontakt 8,” https://www.native-i nstruments.com/en/products/komplete/samplers/konta kt-8/, 2024, software, accessed July 20, 2026

    2024

  40. [48]

    Joshua Bell Violin,

    Embertone, “Joshua Bell Violin,” https://embertone.co m/instruments/joshua-bell-violin-series/, 2024, virtual instrument, accessed July 20, 2026

    2024

  41. [49]

    MOSA: Music motion with semantic annotation dataset for cross-modal music processing,

    Y .-F. Huang, N. Moran, S. Coleman, J. Kelly, S.-H. Wei, P.-Y . Chen, Y .-H. Huang, T.-P. Chen, Y .-C. Kuo, Y .-C. Weiet al., “MOSA: Music motion with semantic annotation dataset for cross-modal music processing,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Lan- guage Processi...

    2024

  42. [50]

    High- resolution violin transcription using weak labels,

    N. C. Tamer, Y . Özer, M. Müller, and X. Serra, “High- resolution violin transcription using weak labels,” in Proc. of the 24th Int. Society for Music Information Re- trieval Conf., 2023, pp. 223–230

    2023

  43. [51]

    VioPTT: Violin technique-aware transcription from synthetic data augmentation,

    T.-K. Wang, Y .-P. Peng, L. Su, and V . K. M. Cheung, “VioPTT: Violin technique-aware transcription from synthetic data augmentation,” inProc. IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2026

    2026

  44. [52]

    Stable audio open,

    Z. Evans, J. D. Parker, C. Carr, Z. Zukowski, J. Taylor, and J. Pons, “Stable audio open,” inProc. IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    Virtual in- strument pre-delay database,

    Online MIDI Orchestration Community, “Virtual in- strument pre-delay database,” https://docs.google.co m/spreadsheets/d/1WP9sobba7OkldNkTiSzXP7r3Pb 64IzWQWrLkqdiyRcA, 2024, accessed July 20, 2026

    2024

  46. [54]

    The bowed string: On the development of helmholtz motion and on the creation of anomalous low frequencies,

    K. Guettler, “The bowed string: On the development of helmholtz motion and on the creation of anomalous low frequencies,” Ph.D. dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 2002

    2002

  47. [55]

    Fréchet Audio Distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms,

    K. Kilgour, M. Zuluaga, D. Roblek, and M. Sharifi, “Fréchet Audio Distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms,” inProc. Interspeech, 2019, pp. 2350–2354

    2019

  48. [56]

    Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation,

    A. Gui, H. Gamper, S. Braun, and D. Emmanouilidou, “Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Large-scale contrastive language- audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to- caption augmentation,

    Y . Wu, K. Chen, T. Zhang, Y . Hui, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and S. Dubnov, “Large-scale contrastive language- audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to- caption augmentation,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP), 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    mir_eval: A transparent implementation of common mir metrics,

    C. Raffel, B. McFee, E. J. Humphrey, J. Salamon, O. Nieto, D. Liang, and D. P. Ellis, “mir_eval: A transparent implementation of common mir metrics,” inProc. of the 15th Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., 2014, pp. 367–372

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.