Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Contextual Quality-Diversity Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for HVAC Control in Tropical Commercial Buildings

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A portfolio of specialised HVAC policies matches a single learned policy on annual energy while cutting chiller-start variance 272-fold and keeping a full-year record of zero humidity-limit violations.

desk verdict New QD-ERL architecture for tropical HVAC is coherent and honestly reported, but the headline 3.40% saving is unvalidated outside a reduced-order simulator. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11324 v1 pith:KPTYELAU submitted 2026-08-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NEmath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NEmath.OC
keywords quality-diversityoptimizationMAP-Elitesevolutionaryreinforcementlearningsoftactor-criticHVACcontroltropicalbuildingssafetyshieldchillerplant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a tropical chiller plant can be controlled better by a portfolio of specialised policies than by any single learned policy. Its controller, CQD-ERL, keeps one archive entry per daily weather-and-load regime and per behaviour niche, filled by an evolutionary search and a soft-actor-critic learner sharing one replay buffer, with every action passed through a hard safety shield. Over a full-year backtest against an ASHRAE Guideline 36 baseline, the portfolio saves 3.40 ± 0.43% of annual plant energy, matches an identically trained single-policy SAC controller on aggregate energy, but is 4.95 times faster at inference, 272 times more reproducible in chiller starts, and 10.4 to 17.8% better at matched part-load duty. The point of the paper is architectural: this is a route to safe, commissionable learned HVAC control whose energy claim is modest but whose safety and reproducibility claims are strong.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the product archive $\mathrm{archive}[i][j]$, indexed by context cell $i$ and behaviour niche $j$. Context is assigned by nearest centroid in a two-component principal-component projection of daily weather-and-load features, while behaviour is assigned by nearest centroid of a four-dimensional policy-probe descriptor $(g_T, g_W, p_n, p_d) \in B \subset \mathbb{R}^4$: regression slopes of chilled-water setpoint against temperature and of tower-fan speed against humidity, plus unoccupied plant-on fractions split by a 29 °C drift threshold. Fitness is normalised against a precomputed Guideline 36 return for the same calendar day, $\tilde{F} = (F - F_{\mathrm{G36}})/F_{\mathrm{G36}}$, which collapses between-context return variance. Variation comes from two operators sharing one replay buffer and twin critics: a gradient-free iso-line-directional mutation of two archive elites, and policy-gradient steps from soft actor-critic. A deterministic safety shield projects every action onto the feasible set, enforcing humidity, dew-point, ramp, and chiller minimum on-off constraints as hard limits rather than reward penalties.

What would settle it

Run CQD-ERL on a calibrated high-fidelity or hardware-in-the-loop chiller-plant emulator for a full Singapore year against an ASHRAE Guideline 36 baseline, recording annual energy, relative-humidity violations, and chiller starts; if the 3.40 ± 0.43% saving or the zero-violation and zero-fallback record does not reproduce, the reduced-order simulator is not a faithful proxy. A targeted check is to compare load-weighted specific power in the 100–400 RT band, where the paper claims 10.4 to 17.8% gains over the baseline.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CQD-ERL is an archive of 216 elite policies indexed jointly by an 18-cell context tessellation and a 12-niche behaviour descriptor. Context comes from four daily features (mean cooling load, latent-load fraction, peak wet-bulb temperature, and solar irradiation) projected onto two principal components, while behaviour is read directly from the policy by probing it with a fixed synthetic observation battery. On five seeds, archive coverage reaches unity in every seed, all 1,080 stored elites outperform the Guideline 36 baseline on their own context, and the controller reduces whole-plant annual energy by 3.40 ± 0.43% with zero relative-humidity violations, zero shield corrections, and zero fallback activations across 131,405 dispatched control steps. At matched evaporator load, the archive is 10.4 to 17.8% more efficient than Guideline 36 in the 100–400 RT part-load band and 5.5 to 11.9 percentage points better than an identically trained SAC policy, despite being statistically indistinguishable on aggregate annual energy. The paper presents the result as an architecture contribution: the evolutionary component does not buy extra annual energy, but it buys faster dispatch, much lower variance in chiller starts, and a portfolio whose members are each validated on their own operating regime.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the custom reduced-order simulator being a faithful proxy for a real tropical chiller plant: the reported 3.40% saving and zero-violation record have not yet been checked against a calibrated high-fidelity twin or a field trial, and the paper lists completing two-tier validation as a remaining priority.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A learned controller can match a strong heuristic baseline on annual energy while improving part-load efficiency by 10.4 to 17.8% in the 100–400 RT band, with zero humidity-limit violations.
  • The archive's 272:1 reduction in chiller-start variance across seeds means maintenance-interval predictions are much more stable, easing commissioning.
  • At 1.29 ms per control step with no online learning or optimisation, dispatch can run on rule-based-grade hardware.
  • In the hottest wet-bulb quartile, which carries 37% of annual energy, both setpoint levers saturate and the saving reverses sign, so further gains must come from load shifting and storage rather than setpoint tuning.
  • The same architecture can be extended to tariff, demand-response, carbon-intensity, or occupancy context axes without changing the search loop.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the part-load result transfers to the field, the practical value may be larger than the 3.40% annual figure suggests: an operator whose load profile sits in the 100–400 RT band would see substantially larger efficiency gains.
  • The zero-violation guarantee is a property of the safety shield's model of the plant; a field test with sensor noise and plant-model error would reveal whether the guarantee survives outside the simulator.
  • Because the behaviour descriptor is a pure function of policy parameters, it could serve as a portability handle when transplanting an elite to another building of similar topology.
  • A tariff-aware context axis, which the paper leaves untested, is a concrete next experiment: with 37% of annual energy in the saturated wet-bulb quartile, time-of-use price signals may yield cost savings where efficiency savings cannot.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CQD-ERL, a contextual quality-diversity evolutionary reinforcement-learning controller for supervisory control of a tropical water-cooled chiller plant and its air side. The controller maintains a product archive of policies indexed by an operating-context tessellation (18 context cells) and a policy-probe behavior descriptor (12 behavior niches per context), filled by iso-line directional variation and SAC policy-gradient updates that share one replay buffer, with every action passed through a deterministic safety shield. Training and evaluation use a purpose-built reduced-order physical environment calibrated toward Singapore conditions, with a two-tier validation design that the paper acknowledges as incomplete. In an annual 365-day backtest against an ASHRAE Guideline 36 baseline, the authors report 3.40 ± 0.43% whole-plant energy reduction over five seeds, zero relative-humidity violations, zero shield corrections, and zero fallback activations, plus 10.4–17.8% part-load efficiency gains in the 100–400 RT band. The paper also reports that a single SAC policy achieves statistically indistinguishable aggregate savings but with much worse reproducibility of chiller starts.

Significance. If the results hold, the contribution is architectural: it demonstrates a scalable quality-diversity/ERL archive for building control, with strong reproducibility (a claimed 272:1 variance ratio in annual chiller starts versus SAC), fast 1.29 ms dispatch, and a physically interpretable strategy (higher chilled-water supply setpoint, more chillers staged, lower tower-fan speed). The load-banded part-load analysis and the wet-bulb-quartile reversal are useful, falsifiable findings, and the paper is honest about aggregate parity with a single-policy SAC learner. The paper ships implementation code, uses five-seed statistics with Welch tests, and reports coverage, quality-diversity score, and dispatch metrics carefully. However, the central claims are computed in an unvalidated reduced-order simulator whose fidelity is the load-bearing assumption; this substantially tempers the significance until the two-tier validation is completed or the claims are explicitly reframed as simulation-only results.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Section 5] The central empirical claims—3.40±0.43% annual saving, zero relative-humidity violations, zero shield corrections, zero fallback activations—are generated entirely in the reduced-order tier of a two-tier environment. Section 3 describes the intended design: a calibrated higher-fidelity Modelica/EnergyPlus twin should carry periodic validation against ASHRAE Guideline 14 criteria (CV(RMSE)≤30%, NMBE≤10%). Section 5 lists "completing two-tier validation" as a remaining priority, and Section 4 presents no calibration residuals, no twin-comparison plots, and no high-fidelity backtest. This gap is load-bearing because the safety shield can only enforce constraints that are correctly modeled; a bias in the latent-load, coil, or humidity-ratio sub-model would invalidate both the energy and the safety claims. The authors should either complete the two-tier validation or explicitly reframe the abstract and conclusion claims as results in a simulation environment.
  2. [Section 2.1.1 (Eq. 4), Section 4] The claim that all 1,080 stored elites "outperform G36 on their own context" goes beyond what Eq. (4) measures. Normalized fitness is computed for a single calendar day, F~(θ) = (F(θ,day) − F_G36(day))/F_G36(day), while a context cell is a cluster of many days. Selection uses one context-representative day per episode drawn from a day-of-week stratified state bank, so a positive F~ on that training day does not establish that the elite beats G36 on other days in the same context cell, especially under the deployed context-switch rule with forecast errors. I recommend reporting per-context generalization, for example the mean normalized fitness over all days in each cell for the deployed elites, or softening the statement to "on the training days used for selection."
  3. [Section 4, safety-shield results] The paper reports "the safety-shield correction magnitude was exactly zero" but does not define what counts as a shield correction. The reward includes a shield-reliance penalty measuring displacement between the requested and the executed action, and the shield includes hard overrides (minimum on-off timer, humidity/dew-point guard, comfort guard) that can force the plant on. If none of these mechanisms ever altered a requested action, that is a strong result and should be stated explicitly with the counting rule; if the zero refers only to a subset of these mechanisms, the current wording is ambiguous and overstates the safety guarantee.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] The reported variance ratio of 272 for annual chiller starts appears inconsistent with the stated 1.0% and 18.9% coefficients of variation; the squared ratio is approximately 357. Please check the calculation.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The headline 3.40% saving is presented without the top-wet-bulb-quartile reversal (Table 2, +0.41% for CQD-ERL in the quartile carrying 37% of annual energy) or the validation caveat; one sentence of qualification would make the claims more precise.
  3. [References] Several references are incomplete, e.g., Chinde and Woldekidan and Boldocký et al. lack journal titles, and Khadka and Tumer lacks venue details; these should be completed for journal submission.
  4. [Section 2.2] The statement "This paper reports the architecture as implemented and evaluated, not as a proposal" sits uneasily with the conclusion's "the controller reduced whole-plant energy by 3.40 ± 0.43%"; the authors should resolve this tension by stating explicitly that the evaluation is in simulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the measured savings and safety record are in-sample simulator results, not reductions to the paper's inputs, and the acknowledged incomplete two-tier validation is a validity limitation rather than a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Fitness is normalized against a precomputed Guideline 36 return in Eq. (4), so positive normalized fitness is definitionally equivalent to outperforming G36 on that day, but the empirical finding that all 1,080 stored elites have positive normalized fitness is not forced by the archive insertion rule, which accepts any candidate into an empty niche and only later requires exceeding the stored value. The annual energy saving is computed by comparing CQD-ERL and G36 in the same reduced-order simulator used for training; this is an in-sample evaluation whose validity depends on simulator fidelity, and the paper itself lists 'completing two-tier validation' as a remaining priority, but this is a correctness and generalization limitation, not a circular derivation. No load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz-smuggling citation appears. The zero-violation record is attributed to a deterministic safety shield that projects actions into the feasible set, which is a mechanism, not a tautology. The central claims therefore do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical claim rests on a purpose-built simulator that is not yet validated against a high-fidelity twin. Several design choices (number of contexts, niches, thresholds, probe subsampling) are free parameters without sensitivity analysis, and key optimizer hyperparameters are unreported.

free parameters (7)
  • Number of context cells = 18
    16 k-means cells plus two fixed sentinels; chosen via PCA variance (77.1%) and a minimum-population constraint, not fitted to the energy result.
  • Number of behavior niches per context = 12
    Hand-selected granularity; no sensitivity analysis reported in the paper.
  • Unoccupied drift threshold for plant-on behavior = 29 degC
    Splits the unoccupied plant-enable descriptor into normal and drift regimes to recover a 0.67 separation.
  • Iso-line mutation scales sigma_1, sigma_2 = not reported
    Equation 5 defines the variation operator but the paper does not report numerical values.
  • SAC hyperparameters (learning rate, target entropy, temperature) = not reported
    Equations 6-8 define the updates; no schedules or values are given, blocking exact reproduction.
  • Probe battery subsample = 4,500 of 9,072 points
    The behavior descriptor uses a fixed subsample of the Cartesian probe grid; the subsampling rule is not justified.
  • Context-switch confirmation window = 2 consecutive days
    Deployment rule to suppress boundary noise; the window length is not optimized or sensitivity-tested.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The reduced-order DAE environment is an adequate model of the real tropical chiller plant.
    All training and evaluation numbers come from this simulator; no calibration residuals or comparison with a high-fidelity twin are reported.
  • domain assumption The Singapore climate, load profile, and SS 553 humidity limits represent the target deployment.
    The case study is built around Changi conditions but no multi-year or multi-building generalization is tested.
  • domain assumption The ASHRAE Guideline 36 baseline is implemented correctly and fairly.
    Every saving is measured relative to this baseline; a biased implementation would scale all reported savings.
  • domain assumption The context tessellation fitted on 363 days generalizes to the full backtest year.
    The PCA basis and k-means centroids are fitted on the same annual data used for evaluation, so the backtest is in-sample for the context mapping.
  • standard math SAC and policy-gradient-assisted MAP-Elites behave as established in prior literature.
    The paper cites prior QD-ERL results instead of re-deriving convergence or sample-complexity guarantees.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Contextual Quality-Diversity Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for HVAC Control in Tropical Commercial Buildings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KPTYELAU

@misc{pith2026260811324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Contextual Quality-Diversity Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for HVAC Control in Tropical Commercial Buildings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KPTYELAU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11324}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a contextual quality-diversity evolutionary reinforcement-learning controller, CQD-ERL, for the supervisory control of a tropical, water-cooled chiller plant and its associated air side. Rather than converging to a single scalarised policy, the controller maintains a product archive of specialised policies indexed jointly by a data- driven operating context, a cluster of daily weather and load regime, and a context-invariant behaviour descriptor, filled by a gradient-free evolutionary operator and a soft-actor-critic policy-gradient operator that share one replay buffer. Every action is filtered through a deterministic safety shield before execution. The controller is trained on a two-tier reduced-order environment representing the latent load, cooling-tower approach and humidity constraints of a Singapore commercial building, and is evaluated over a full annual backtest against an ASHRAE Guideline 36 baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. CQD-ERL algorithm diagram. 2.2 Implementation Context is defined empirically rather than assumed. Each calendar day is summarised by four features: mean cooling load, latent-load fraction, peak wet-bulb temperature and daily solar irradiation. Projected onto their top two principal components, these jointly explain 77.1% of the feature variance. K-means clustering of the 363 non-extreme days into 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Context archive: principal-component basis and the cell map with day populations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Policy-probe behaviour descriptor: (left) regime split vs. pooled (genomes sorted by gap), (right) axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coverage-normalised mean elite fitness in the training loop, and the elite-fitness map. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Elite-genome parameter concentration of the 216 elites and 8,838-dimensional genomes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bridging Evolutionary Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Hybrid Algorithms , volume =

    Li, Pengyi and Hao, Jianye and Tang, Hongyao and Fu, Xian and Zheng, Yan and Tang, Ke , urldate =. Bridging Evolutionary Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Hybrid Algorithms , volume =. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2024.3443913 , shorttitle =

  2. [2]

    Quality-Diversity Actor-Critic:Learning High-Performing and Diverse Behaviorsvia Value and Successor Features Critics , abstract =

    Grillotti, Luca and Faldor, Maxence and León, Borja González and Cully, Antoine , date =. Quality-Diversity Actor-Critic:Learning High-Performing and Diverse Behaviorsvia Value and Successor Features Critics , abstract =

  3. [3]

    Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor , url =

    Haarnoja, Tuomas and Zhou, Aurick and Abbeel, Pieter and Levine, Sergey , urldate =. Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1801.01290 , shorttitle =. 1801.01290 [cs.LG] , keywords =

  4. [4]

    Evolution-Guided Policy Gradient in Reinforcement Learning , abstract =

    Khadka, Shauharda and Tumer, Kagan , date =. Evolution-Guided Policy Gradient in Reinforcement Learning , abstract =

  5. [5]

    Collaborative Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning , issn =

    Khadka, Shauharda and Majumdar, Somdeb and Nassar, Tarek and Dwiel, Zach and Tumer, Evren and Miret, Santiago and Liu, Yinyin and Tumer, Kagan , urldate =. Collaborative Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning , issn =. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , publisher =

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =

    Discovering the Elite Hypervolume by Leveraging Interspecies Correlation , url =. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =. doi:10.1145/3205455.3205602 , abstract =. 1804.03906 [cs.NE] , keywords =

  7. [7]

    Combining Evolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Policy Search: a Survey

    Sigaud, Olivier , urldate =. Combining Evolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Policy Search: a Survey , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.14009 , shorttitle =. 2203.14009 [cs.LG] , keywords =

  8. [8]

    Policy gradient assisted

    Nilsson, Olle and Cully, Antoine , urldate =. Policy gradient assisted. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , publisher =. doi:10.1145/3449639.3459304 , series =

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Reinforcement learning for building controls: The opportunities and challenges , volume =

    Wang, Zhe and Hong, Tianzhen , urldate =. Reinforcement learning for building controls: The opportunities and challenges , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115036 , shorttitle =

  2. [10]

    and Nagy, Zoltán , urldate =

    Vázquez-Canteli, José R. and Nagy, Zoltán , urldate =. Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.002 , shorttitle =

  3. [11]

    Deep Reinforcement Learning for Building

    Wei, Tianshu and Wang, Yanzhi and Zhu, Qi , urldate =. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Building. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference 2017 , publisher =. doi:10.1145/3061639.3062224 , series =

  4. [12]

    Transfer learning for smart buildings: A critical review of algorithms, applications, and future perspectives , volume =

    Pinto, Giuseppe and Wang, Zhe and Roy, Abhishek and Hong, Tianzhen and Capozzoli, Alfonso , urldate =. Transfer learning for smart buildings: A critical review of algorithms, applications, and future perspectives , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100084 , shorttitle =

  5. [13]

    Physics informed neural networks for control oriented thermal modeling of buildings , volume =

    Gokhale, Gargya and Claessens, Bert and Develder, Chris , urldate =. Physics informed neural networks for control oriented thermal modeling of buildings , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118852 , abstract =

  6. [14]

    Multi-zone

    Ding, Xianzhong and Cerpa, Alberto and Du, Wan , urldate =. Multi-zone. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.00725 , abstract =. 2302.00725 [eess.SY] , keywords =

  7. [15]

    Data Center Cooling System Optimization Using Offline Reinforcement Learning , url =

    Zhan, Xianyuan and Zhu, Xiangyu and Cheng, Peng and Hu, Xiao and He, Ziteng and Geng, Hanfei and Leng, Jichao and Zheng, Huiwen and Liu, Chenhui and Hong, Tianshun and Liang, Yan and Liu, Yunxin and Zhao, Feng , urldate =. Data Center Cooling System Optimization Using Offline ...

  8. [16]

    and Helsen, Lieve , urldate =

    Drgoňa, Ján and Arroyo, Javier and Cupeiro Figueroa, Iago and Blum, David and Arendt, Krzysztof and Kim, Donghun and Ollé, Enric Perarnau and Oravec, Juraj and Wetter, Michael and Vrabie, Draguna L. and Helsen, Lieve , urldate =. All you need to know about model predictive con...

  9. [17]

    Model predictive control for optimal dispatch of chillers and thermal energy storage tank in airports , volume =

    Chinde, Venkatesh and Woldekidan, Korbaga , urldate =. Model predictive control for optimal dispatch of chillers and thermal energy storage tank in airports , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114120 , pages =

  10. [18]

    Rule extraction from deep reinforcement learning controller and comparative analysis with

    Razzano, Giuseppe and Brandi, Silvio and Piscitelli, Marco Savino and Capozzoli, Alfonso , urldate =. Rule extraction from deep reinforcement learning controller and comparative analysis with. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125046 , abstract =

  11. [19]

    Deploying deep reinforcement learning for low-level

    Savino, Sabrina and Razzano, Giuseppe and Pagone, Michele and Novara, Carlo and Capozzoli, Alfonso , urldate =. Deploying deep reinforcement learning for low-level. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116456 , shorttitle =

  12. [20]

    and Liu, Gang and Wang, Zhe , urldate =

    Li, Shuhao and Li, Siqi and Mohebi, Parastoo and Wang, Dan and Ma, Martin N.H. and Liu, Gang and Wang, Zhe , urldate =. Field demonstration of model predictive control for chiller sequencing in large-scale commercial buildings , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116021 , abstract =

  13. [21]

    Model Predictive Control for chiller plant energy efficiency: Leveraging multi-horizon forecasting and machine learning-based system models , volume =

    Khunmaturod, Assawayut and Lekawat, Andaman and Tongdee, Sittisak and Khampanchai, Warodom , urldate =. Model Predictive Control for chiller plant energy efficiency: Leveraging multi-horizon forecasting and machine learning-based system models , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.20...

  14. [22]

    Building optimization testing framework (

    Blum, David and Arroyo, Javier and Huang, Sen and Drgoňa, Ján and Jorissen, Filip and Walnum, Harald Taxt and Chen, Yan and Benne, Kyle and Vrabie, Draguna and Wetter, Michael and Helsen, Lieve , urldate =. Building optimization testing framework (. doi:10.1080/19401493.2021.1...

  15. [23]

    Identification of multi-zone grey-box building models for use in model predictive control , volume =

    Arroyo, Javier and Spiessens, Fred and Helsen, Lieve , urldate =. Identification of multi-zone grey-box building models for use in model predictive control , volume =. doi:10.1080/19401493.2020.1770861 , abstract =

  16. [24]

    Spawn: coupling Modelica Buildings Library and

    Wetter, Michael and Benne, Kyle and Tummescheit, Hubertus and Winther, Christian , urldate =. Spawn: coupling Modelica Buildings Library and. doi:10.1080/19401493.2023.2266414 , shorttitle =

  17. [25]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.03665 , shorttitle =

    Chalumeau, Felix and Lim, Bryan and Boige, Raphael and Allard, Maxime and Grillotti, Luca and Flageat, Manon and Macé, Valentin and Flajolet, Arthur and Pierrot, Thomas and Cully, Antoine , urldate =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.03665 , shorttitle =. 2308.03665 [cs.AI] , keywords =

  18. [26]

    Data center chiller plant optimization via mixed-integer nonlinear differentiable predictive control , volume =

    Boldocký, Ján and Faulkner, Cary and Michael, Elad and Gulan, Martin and Tuor, Aaron and Drgoňa, Ján , urldate =. Data center chiller plant optimization via mixed-integer nonlinear differentiable predictive control , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2026.107063 , abstract =

  19. [27]

    doi:10.1080/19401493.2024.2418813 , shorttitle =

    Nweye, Kingsley and Kaspar, Kathryn and Buscemi, Giacomo and Fonseca, Tiago and Pinto, Giuseppe and Ghose, Dipanjan and Duddukuru, Satvik and Pratapa, Pavani and Li, Han and Mohammadi, Javad and Lino Ferreira, Luis and Hong, Tianzhen and Ouf, Mohamed and Capozzoli, Alfonso and...

  20. [28]

    Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =

    Parametric-Task. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =. doi:10.1145/3638529.3653993 , abstract =. 2402.01275 [cs.NE] , keywords =

  21. [29]

    The 2020 Conference on Artificial Life , author =

    Fast and stable. The 2020 Conference on Artificial Life , author =. doi:10.1162/isal_a_00316 , abstract =. 2006.14253 [cs.NE] , keywords =

  22. [30]

    Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =

    Quality Diversity for Multi-task Optimization , url =. Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference , author =. doi:10.1145/3377930.3390203 , abstract =. 2003.04407 [cs.NE] , keywords =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.