Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Large Language Models for Education: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13001 v1 pith:2BIP4FI5 submitted 2024-05-12 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords educationllmsllmedutechnologiesbeenchallengeslanguagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a profound impact on traditional education. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used in various applications such as natural language processing, computer vision, speech recognition, and autonomous driving. LLMs have also been applied in many fields, including recommendation, finance, government, education, legal affairs, and finance. As powerful auxiliary tools, LLMs incorporate various technologies such as deep learning, pre-training, fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. The use of LLMs for smart education (LLMEdu) has been a significant strategic direction for countries worldwide. While LLMs have shown great promise in improving teaching quality, changing education models, and modifying teacher roles, the technologies are still facing several challenges. In this paper, we conduct a systematic review of LLMEdu, focusing on current technologies, challenges, and future developments. We first summarize the current state of LLMEdu and then introduce the characteristics of LLMs and education, as well as the benefits of integrating LLMs into education. We also review the process of integrating LLMs into the education industry, as well as the introduction of related technologies. Finally, we discuss the challenges and problems faced by LLMEdu, as well as prospects for future optimization of LLMEdu.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ZPD-SCA: Unveiling the Blind Spots of LLMs in Assessing Students' Cognitive Abilities

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ZPD-SCA, an expert-annotated Chinese reading benchmark, shows LLMs judge reading difficulty for student age groups poorly in zero-shot settings and improve, but remain biased, with in-context examples.

  2. Embracing Imperfection: Simulating Students with Diverse Cognitive Levels Using LLM-based Agents

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A knowledge-graph cognitive prototype plus beam-search self-refinement lets LLM agents simulate students' imperfect programming solutions more accurately than plain prompting.

  3. Deploying AI for Signal Processing education: Selected challenges and intriguing opportunities

    eess.SP 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI can be used to generate interactive signal processing courseware, but the paper offers no evidence that students learn better from it.

  4. The Revolution Has Arrived: What the Current State of Large Language Models in Education Implies for the Future

    cs.HC 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A narrative review of LLMs in education that speculates, without new evidence, that conversational interfaces will replace traditional WIMP-style interaction as the default.

Pith tools