REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards a Research Community in Interpretable Reinforcement Learning: the InterpPol Workshop
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Embracing the pursuit of intrinsically explainable reinforcement learning raises crucial questions: what distinguishes explainability from interpretability? Should explainable and interpretable agents be developed outside of domains where transparency is imperative? What advantages do interpretable policies offer over neural networks? How can we rigorously define and measure interpretability in policies, without user studies? What reinforcement learning paradigms,are the most suited to develop interpretable agents? Can Markov Decision Processes integrate interpretable state representations? In addition to motivate an Interpretable RL community centered around the aforementioned questions, we propose the first venue dedicated to Interpretable RL: the InterpPol Workshop.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Perspectives for Direct Interpretability in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
A perspective paper that advocates direct, post hoc interpretability for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning and offers a taxonomy of where those methods might apply.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.