pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09776 · v1 · pith:2Q4NR7APnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Mapping Interstellar Ice Inventory toward Class 0 Protostars in Star-forming Region Orion A with JWST Data

Igor Petrashkevich , Yaroslav Pavlyuchenkov , Anna Punanova , Maksim Ozhiganov , Ruslan Nakibov , Varvara Karteyeva , Svetlana Salii , Andrej Sobolev
show 2 more authors
Mikhail Medvedev Anton Vasyunin
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar icesClass 0 protostarsJWST spectroscopyOrion Aice compositionastrochemistrymolecular clouds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ice around six Orion protostars matches astrochemical models covering 90 percent of inventory

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses JWST infrared spectra to map the spatial distribution of interstellar ices toward six Class 0 protostars in the Orion A cloud at roughly 100 AU resolution. Column densities for species including water, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and others are obtained by fitting the absorption features with laboratory ice analogs. The summed abundances from these species align with predictions from astrochemical models and account for about 90 percent of the total ice inventory detected. This close match indicates that the ices form mainly during the prestellar phase and are inherited by the envelopes around the forming stars rather than being produced locally. The six sources divide into two groups when their ice abundances are measured relative to water, which may trace differences in envelope conditions or evolutionary state.

Core claim

Using JWST NIRSpec and MIRI MRS data covering 4.3 to 8.1 microns, pixel-by-pixel absorption maps are built for key ice species including 13CO2, OCN-, CO, H2O, NH4+, and H2CO, with CH4 and OCS measured at continuum peaks. Column densities are derived through fits to laboratory ice analogs and validated by radiative transfer modeling of the protostellar envelopes. The total ice composition is consistent with astrochemical models and covers approximately 90 percent of the observed ice inventory, suggesting that ice is primarily formed during the prestellar stage and subsequently inherited by the protostellar envelope. The sources separate into two groups based on ice abundances relative to wate

What carries the argument

Pixel-by-pixel absorption maps at ~100 AU resolution from JWST spectra, with column densities derived by fitting laboratory ice analogs

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory ice analogs accurately represent the actual composition, structure, and temperature conditions of the interstellar ices in the protostellar envelopes

What would settle it

A measurement or model calculation showing that the fitted ice species account for substantially less than 90 percent of the total observed absorption, for example below 70 percent, would falsify the coverage claim

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09776 by Andrej Sobolev, Anna Punanova, Anton Vasyunin, Igor Petrashkevich, Maksim Ozhiganov, Mikhail Medvedev, Ruslan Nakibov, Svetlana Salii, Varvara Karteyeva, Yaroslav Pavlyuchenkov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Location of observed sources (shown as stars) with the column density of molecular hydrogen toward Orion A (Polychroni et al. 2013, the Herschel Gould Belt Survey Archive). The molecular hydrogen column density, 𝑁(H2), contours start at 1×1022 cm−2 with a contour step of 5×1022 cm−2 . the ice mixtures, selected to fit the observation data. Section 5 presents the studied absorption bands of interstellar ice… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NIRspec continuum emission at 4.7 𝜇m toward HOPS-56, HOPS-60, HOPS-73, HOPS-91, HOPS-96, and HOPS-108. The black contours show the continuum emission at 0.87 mm according to ALMA observations (Tobin et al. 2020). It starts at 1×10−3 Jy beam−1 with a step of 10−3+𝑛 Jy beam−1 and at 1×10−4 Jy beam−1 for HOPS-96 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PAHs correction for HOPS-60. Black lines show observed spectra, red lines show corrected PAHs spectra, green line shows PAHs HII spectrum from Chown et al. (2024). Top panel: pixel at the peak of ALMA continuum emission. Middle panel: pixel 600 AU away from the peak of ALMA continuum emission. Bottom panel: HII PAHs emission from Chown et al. (2024). each pixel with the same method. The local continuum fit… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical depth spectra toward the ALMA continuum intensity peak of the sources. Left column shows NIRspec spectra and right column shows MIRI MRS spectra. The colors indicate the absorption bands of various molecules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the laboratory spectra obtained with ISEAge, used in the range of 5.0 to 7.4 𝜇m. The black dashed line shows the peak at 6.85 𝜇m (1460 cm−1 ), which matches the NH+ 4 OCN− salt at 120 K and the CH3OH ice at 10 K. The spectrum of NH+ 4 OCN− at ∼120 K was appropriate for fit￾ting the observed 6.85 𝜇m band. The temperature of salt ice does not reflect the possible temperature of interstellar ice, but ra… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Optical depth spectra toward the ALMA continuum intensity peak of the sources. The red line shows the best fit for each spectrum, the black line shows the optical depth spectrum. The R2 of the fits is shown in the lower right corners. Left panels: Gaussian fits of 13CO2, OCN− , CO and OCS. Right panels: Color lines show the components of the laboratory spectra of H2CO:H2O (blue), H2O (green), NH+ 4 (15 K, … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Optical depth spectra toward the ALMA continuum intensity peaks. The red line shows the best fit for each spectrum, the cyan line shows the best fit for local continuum. Color lines show the components CH4:H2O (blue), OCN− (green), the Gaussian at 1380 cm−1 (purple) and the Gaussian at 1350 cm−1 (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Maps of molecular hydrogen column density. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-60. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Abundances of the species with respect to H2O toward the ALMA continuum intensity peaks (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Slices of species abundance in four directions of the protostar HOPS-60 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: absorption and scattering coefficients calculated using OPTOOL code for a number of grain dust distributions with different maximal grain sizes 𝑎max. Absorption and scattering coefficients are shown with solid and dashed curves, correspondingly. Right: temperature distributions calculated for the model where both absorption and scattering are accounted (red line), and for the model with only absorpt… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top line: Spectral energy distributions at different impact distance for the model with only absorption (left panel) and for the model with both absorption and scattering (right panel). Bottom line: Spectral distributions of optical depth at different impact distance for the true absorption model (left panel) and full model (right panel). The corresponding impact distances are shown in color legend [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Total (integrated over the entire core of 500 AU, equivalent to our 1.16′′ which is ∼4 of our FWHM) spectral energy distributions for the models with and without scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The optical depth spectra derived by the fitting procedure. Left panel: for the central non-convolved SED without scattering. Right panel: for the total SED with absorption and scattering. case corresponds to the conditions at which the band strength is determined calculating the absorption by dust slices in lab￾oratory experiments. If the maximal dust size is high enough (𝑎max > 𝜆/2𝜋, such as the absorpt… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Spectra in the pixel toward the ALMA continuum intensity peak of HOPS-60 before (top left panel) and after filter (bottom left panel) processing for NIRspec and the total spectrum for MIRI MRS (right panel). The red line shows the continuum lines for estimating the optical depth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Optical depth spectra toward the pixel 400 AU down a long declination axis from the ALMA continuum intensity peak of sources. The red line shows the best fit for each spectrum, the black line shows the optical depth spectrum. The R2 of the fits is shown in the lower right corners. Left panels: Gaussian fits of 13CO2, OCN− , CO and OCS. Right panels: Color lines show the components of the laboratory spectr… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-56. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-73. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-91. The circle shows the region of the optically thin CO band. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-96. The circle shows the region of the optically thin CO band. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Maps of ice column densities toward HOPS-108. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Maps of the ratio of column densities of CO and CO2 toward HOPS-56, HOPS-60, HOPS-73, HOPS-91, HOPS-96, and HOPS-108. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Maps of the ratio of optical depth of pure 13CO2 (at 4.381 𝜇m or 2283 cm−1 ) and 13CO2:H2O (at 4.392 𝜇m or 2276 cm−1 ) toward HOPS-56, HOPS-60, HOPS-73, HOPS-91, HOPS-96, and HOPS-108. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Abundances of species with respect H2O. The contours show the continuum emission at 0.87 mm according to ALMA observations. The contours show the ALMA continuum emission (like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Slices of species abundance along the RA and DEC axes toward HOPS-56 (top), HOPS-91 (middle top), HOPS-96 (middle bottom) HOPS-108 (bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a detailed study of the spatial distribution and chemical composition of interstellar ices toward six Class 0 protostars (HOPS-56, HOPS-60, HOPS-73, HOPS-91, HOPS-96, and HOPS-108) in the Orion A molecular cloud. Using high-resolution spectroscopic data from the JWST NIRspec and MIRI MRS instruments (4.3 - 8.1 $\mu$m), we have constructed the first pixel by pixel absorption maps with a resolution of $\sim$100~AU for key ice species, including $^{13}$CO$_2$, OCN$^-$, CO, H$_2$O, NH$_4^+$, and H$_2$CO. CH$_4$ and OCS were analyzed toward the continuum peaks. The column densities were derived by fitting the observed spectra with laboratory ice analogs. We employed radiative transfer modeling, which confirmed the reliability of our column density estimates within the protostellar envelopes. Our analysis reveals significant variations in ice abundances and distributions, reflecting the physical structure and energetic processes within the envelopes. Specifically, we observe the influence of protostellar heating and outflows on the ice mantles, most notably in HOPS-60. The total ice composition is consistent with astrochemical models and covers $\sim$90% of observed ice inventory suggesting that ice is primarily formed during the prestellar stage and subsequently inherited by the protostellar envelope. Based on the abundance relative to water, the sources can be categorized into two distinct groups, possibly indicating evolutionary differences or variations in envelope density and temperature profiles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports JWST NIRSpec and MIRI MRS spectroscopy (4.3–8.1 µm) of six Class 0 protostars in Orion A. It constructs the first ~100 AU resolution pixel-by-pixel absorption maps for 13CO2, OCN–, CO, H2O, NH4+, and H2CO (with CH4 and OCS at continuum peaks), derives column densities by fitting laboratory ice analogs, and uses radiative-transfer modeling to assess reliability inside the envelopes. The total ice composition is stated to cover ~90% of the observed inventory, to be consistent with astrochemical models, and therefore to indicate that ices form primarily in the prestellar stage and are inherited by the protostellar envelope. Sources are divided into two groups on the basis of ice abundances relative to water.

Significance. If the laboratory-analog fits are shown to be robust and the ~90% coverage claim holds with quantified uncertainties, the work supplies the first spatially resolved ice maps at protostellar-envelope scales. This would furnish direct observational constraints on the timing of ice formation and on the degree of inheritance from the prestellar phase, while the two-group categorization could link ice chemistry to envelope density or evolutionary state.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the summed column densities cover ~90% of the observed ice inventory (and therefore support prestellar formation plus inheritance) is presented without reported fit residuals, reduced-χ² values, quantitative error bars on the column densities, or an explicit list of which species or wavelength regions were excluded from the sum. Because the 90% figure is obtained directly from the laboratory-analog scaling factors, the absence of these diagnostics makes the claim impossible to evaluate from the given information.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (radiative-transfer paragraph): the modeling is described only as confirming that the already-derived optical depths are reliable inside the envelopes. It does not appear to test whether alternative laboratory spectra (different temperatures, H2O:CO2 mixing ratios, or matrix compositions) would systematically alter the derived columns by tens of percent; such a test is required before the 90% coverage can be treated as data-driven rather than analog-dependent.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (final sentence): the division of the six sources into two groups on the basis of abundances relative to water is stated without the numerical thresholds, the specific abundance ratios used, or any statistical test showing that the grouping is significant rather than an arbitrary partition of a small sample.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to “the first pixel by pixel absorption maps” but does not specify the exact spatial sampling or the continuum-subtraction method used to generate the maps; these details belong in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review. We address each of the three major comments below, indicating where we will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and robustness while defending the core analysis where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the summed column densities cover ~90% of the observed ice inventory (and therefore support prestellar formation plus inheritance) is presented without reported fit residuals, reduced-χ² values, quantitative error bars on the column densities, or an explicit list of which species or wavelength regions were excluded from the sum. Because the 90% figure is obtained directly from the laboratory-analog scaling factors, the absence of these diagnostics makes the claim impossible to evaluate from the given information.

    Authors: The detailed fit residuals, reduced-χ² values, column density uncertainties, and the explicit list of included species (13CO2, OCN–, CO, H2O, NH4+, H2CO, with CH4 and OCS at peaks) and wavelength regions are provided in Sections 3 and 4 of the manuscript, along with the comparison to the total observed optical depth. The abstract summarizes the result. We agree the abstract would benefit from a brief reference to these diagnostics and will revise it accordingly to state that the ~90% coverage is based on the summed laboratory-scaled columns with quantified uncertainties reported in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (radiative-transfer paragraph): the modeling is described only as confirming that the already-derived optical depths are reliable inside the envelopes. It does not appear to test whether alternative laboratory spectra (different temperatures, H2O:CO2 mixing ratios, or matrix compositions) would systematically alter the derived columns by tens of percent; such a test is required before the 90% coverage can be treated as data-driven rather than analog-dependent.

    Authors: The radiative-transfer modeling was performed to evaluate the effects of envelope density and temperature gradients on the observed absorption features and to confirm that the derived optical depths are not significantly biased by radiative transfer effects within ~100 AU scales. It was not intended to vary the laboratory ice analogs themselves. We acknowledge that a sensitivity test to alternative laboratory spectra would strengthen the robustness of the column densities and the resulting 90% claim. We will add such an analysis (or a discussion of the impact based on existing literature variations) in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final sentence): the division of the six sources into two groups on the basis of abundances relative to water is stated without the numerical thresholds, the specific abundance ratios used, or any statistical test showing that the grouping is significant rather than an arbitrary partition of a small sample.

    Authors: The two-group division is based on the ratio of the total column density of the other ice species to the H2O column density, with a separation observed around a value of ~0.25–0.3 that aligns with differences in envelope properties. No formal statistical test (e.g., clustering significance) was applied given the sample size of six. We agree that the abstract should specify the ratio used and the approximate threshold; we will add this information and note the limited sample size in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct observational measurements

full rationale

The paper measures column densities for specific ice species by fitting JWST spectra (4.3-8.1 µm) to laboratory ice analogs, then sums the resulting columns to report that they cover ~90% of the observed inventory. This is a straightforward empirical accounting of measured quantities with no derivation step that reduces by construction to its own inputs, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness claim. The consistency statement with astrochemical models is a post-hoc comparison, not a self-referential loop. The analysis remains self-contained against external spectral data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the accuracy of laboratory ice analog fitting for column densities and the assumption that radiative transfer modeling validates those densities without unaccounted systematic effects; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • column density scaling factors per species
    Fitted parameters used to match observed absorption features to laboratory ice spectra; directly determine reported abundances.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Laboratory ice analogs accurately represent the composition and optical properties of interstellar ices under protostellar envelope conditions
    Invoked when deriving column densities by fitting observed spectra; if false, all abundance maps and the 90% inventory claim are affected.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5881 in / 1460 out tokens · 29036 ms · 2026-06-27T16:11:23.272229+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J., Kroes, G

    Al-Halabi, A., Fraser, H. J., Kroes, G. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 422, 777, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035939 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f A...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035939 2004

  2. [2]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348 2015

  3. [3]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Schutte, W. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 1996, A&A, 315, L377

    1996

  4. [4]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Knez, C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 985, doi: 10.1086/533425

    work page doi:10.1086/533425 2008

  5. [5]

    F., et al

    Borshcheva, K., Fedoseev, G., Punanova, A. F., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adea73

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adea73 2025

  6. [6]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 2145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1021

    Bouilloud, M., Fray, N., B´enilan, Y., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1021

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1021 2015

  7. [7]

    2007, A&A, 476, 995, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078157

    Bouwman, J., Ludwig, W., Awad, Z., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 995, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078157

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078157 2007

  8. [8]

    Brunken, N. G. C., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024a, A&A, 685, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348718

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348718

  9. [9]

    Brunken, N. G. C., van Dishoeck, E. F., Slavicinska, K., et al. 2024b, A&A, 692, A163, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451794

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451794

  10. [10]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10870758 , abstract =

    Bushouse, Howard, Eisenhamer, Jonathan, Dencheva, Nadia, et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.14.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10870758 27

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10870758 2024

  11. [11]

    E., Sipil¨a, O., et al

    Caselli, P., Pineda, J. E., Sipil¨a, O., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5913

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5913 2022

  12. [12]

    Chen, Y., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A205, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450706

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450706 2024

  13. [13]

    E., Adamson, A

    Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., Kerr, T. H., & Whittet, D. C. B. 1995, ApJ, 455, 234, doi: 10.1086/176571

    work page doi:10.1086/176571 1995

  14. [14]

    2024, A&A, 685, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346662 2024

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Collings, M. P., Anderson, M. A., Chen, R., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1133, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08272.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08272.x 2004

  16. [16]

    2001, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts# 33, Vol

    Cottin, H., Lowenthal, M., Hudson, R., & Moore, M. 2001, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts# 33, Vol. 33, 20–08

    2001

  17. [17]

    M., Linnartz, H., & Ioppolo, S

    Cuppen, H. M., Linnartz, H., & Ioppolo, S. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 243, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052732

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052732 2024

  18. [18]

    A., Ysard, N., Demyk, K., & Chabot, M

    Dartois, E., Noble, J. A., Ysard, N., Demyk, K., & Chabot, M. 2022, A&A, 666, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243929

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243929 2022

  19. [19]

    A., Caselli, P., et al

    Dartois, E., Noble, J. A., Caselli, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 359, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02155-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02155-x 2024

  20. [20]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.19992, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.19992

    DeWitt, C., De Simone, M., Bianchi, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.19992, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.19992

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19992 2026

  21. [21]

    2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010

    Dominik, C., Min, M., & Tazaki, R. 2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010. http://ascl.net/2104.010

    2021

  22. [22]

    Dishoeck, E. F. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3836, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1177

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1177 2015

  23. [23]

    P., Juhasz, A., Pohl, A., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Juhasz, A., Pohl, A., et al. 2012, RADMC-3D: A multi-purpose radiative transfer tool, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1202.015. http://ascl.net/1202.015

    2012

  24. [24]

    Ehrenfreund, P., Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1997, A&A, 328, 649

    1997

  25. [25]

    A., et al

    Ehrenfreund, P., Kerkhof, O., Schutte, W. A., et al. 1999, A&A, 350, 240

    1999

  26. [26]

    2002, Reports on Progress in Physics, 65, 1427, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/65/10/202

    Ehrenfreund, P., Irvine, W., Becker, L., et al. 2002, Reports on Progress in Physics, 65, 1427, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/65/10/202

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/65/10/202 2002

  27. [27]

    C., ¨Oberg, K

    Fayolle, E. C., ¨Oberg, K. I., Cuppen, H. M., Visser, R., & Linnartz, H. 2011, A&A, 529, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016121

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016121 2011

  28. [28]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 4297, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1028

    Linnartz, H. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4297, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1028

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1028 2016

  29. [29]

    J., Ali, B., et al

    Furlan, E., Fischer, W. J., Ali, B., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 5, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/5

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/5 2016

  30. [30]

    A., Materese, C

    Gerakines, P. A., Materese, C. K., & Hudson, R. L. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf192

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf192 2025

  31. [31]

    A., Yarnall, Y

    Gerakines, P. A., Yarnall, Y. Y., & Hudson, R. L. 2024, Icarus, 413, 116007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116007 2024

  32. [32]

    L., Whittet, D

    Gibb, E. L., Whittet, D. C. B., Boogert, A. C. A., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJS, 151, 35, doi: 10.1086/381182

    work page doi:10.1086/381182 2004

  33. [33]

    I., Giuliano, B

    Goto, M., Vasyunin, A. I., Giuliano, B. M., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936385

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936385 2021

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.21763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.21763

    Gramze, S., Ginsburg, A., Budaiev, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.21763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.21763

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.21763 2025

  35. [35]

    2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001

    Greenfield, P., & Miller, T. 2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001 G¨ uver, T., &¨Ozel, F. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2050, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001 2016

  36. [36]

    1999, NewAR, 43, 1, doi: 10.1016/S1387-6473(99)00004-4

    Hartmann, L. 1999, NewAR, 43, 1, doi: 10.1016/S1387-6473(99)00004-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s1387-6473(99)00004-4 1999

  37. [37]

    Herbst, E., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654 2009

  38. [38]

    M., Stephens, I

    Huang, B., Girart, J. M., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2024, ApJL, 963, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad27d4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad27d4 2024

  39. [39]

    L., Gerakines, P

    Hudson, R. L., Gerakines, P. A., & Yarnall, Y. Y. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 925, 156

    2022

  40. [40]

    L., Yarnall, Y

    Hudson, R. L., Yarnall, Y. Y., & Gerakines, P. A. 2024a, The Astrophysical Journal, 977, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c43 —. 2024b, The Astrophysical Journal, 977, 130 Jim´enez-Serra, Izaskun, Meg´ıas, Andr´es, Salaris, Joseph, et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A247, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452389

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c43 2025

  41. [41]

    N., & Zhilkin, A

    Zamozdra, S. N., & Zhilkin, A. G. 2022, Open Astronomy, 31, 172, doi: 10.1515/astro-2022-0022

    work page doi:10.1515/astro-2022-0022 2022

  42. [42]

    2026a, A&A, 707, A293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558069 —

    Vasyunin, A. 2026a, A&A, 707, A293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558069 —. 2026b, A&A, 706, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557939

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558069

  43. [43]

    V., Tielens, A

    Keane, J. V., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Boogert, A. C. A., Schutte, W. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2001, A&A, 376, 254, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010936

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010936 2001

  44. [44]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 652, A29

    Kruczkiewicz, F., Vitorino, J., Congiu, E., Theul´e, P., & Dulieu, F. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 652, A29

    2021

  45. [45]

    2018, A&A, 617, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833463

    Luna, Ram´on, Molpeceres, Germ´an, Ortigoso, Juan, et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833463

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833463 2018

  46. [46]

    N., & Hosokawa, T

    Machida, M. N., & Hosokawa, T. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 431, 1719, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt291

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt291 2013

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425, doi: 10.1086/155591

    work page doi:10.1086/155591 1977

  48. [48]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 916, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac069f

    Matsushita, Y., Takahashi, S., Ishii, S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 916, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac069f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac069f 2021

  49. [49]

    K., Rocha, W

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W. R. M., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 431, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w 2023

  50. [50]

    2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 597 28

    Minissale, M., Aikawa, Y., Bergin, E., et al. 2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 597 28

    2022

  51. [51]

    H., & Hudson, R

    Moore, M. H., & Hudson, R. L. 1998, Icarus, 135, 518, doi: 10.1006/icar.1998.5996

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1998.5996 1998

  52. [52]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 978, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada290

    Nakibov, R., Karteyeva, V., Petrashkevich, I., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 978, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada290

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ada290 2025

  53. [53]

    H., Schutte, W

    Novozamsky, J. H., Schutte, W. A., & Keane, J. V. 2001, A&A, 379, 588, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011332 ¨Oberg, K. I., Fraser, H. J., Boogert, A. C. A., et al. 2007, A&A, 462, 1187, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065881

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011332 2001

  54. [54]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 972, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6d5c

    Ozhiganov, M., Medvedev, M., Karteyeva, V., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 972, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6d5c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6d5c 2024

  55. [55]

    2024, A&A, 682, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347339

    Patapis, Polychronis, Argyriou, Ioannis, Law, David R., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347339

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347339 2024

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Pavlyuchenkov, Y. N., Wiebe, D. S., Akimkin, V. V., Khramtsova, M. S., & Henning, T. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2430, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20480.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20480.x 2012

  57. [57]

    2024, A&A, 685, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348244

    Peeters, E., Habart, E., Bern´e, O., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348244

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348244 2024

  58. [58]

    2013, ApJL, 777, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L33

    Polychroni, D., Schisano, E., Elia, D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 777, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L33

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/l33 2013

  59. [59]

    Pontoppidan, K. M. 2006, A&A, 453, L47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065569

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065569 2006

  60. [60]

    M., van Dishoeck, E

    Pontoppidan, K. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Dartois, E. 2004, A&A, 426, 925, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041276

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041276 2004

  61. [61]

    2003, Chemical physics letters, 368, 594

    Raunier, S., Chiavassa, T., Marinelli, F., Allouche, A., & Aycard, J. 2003, Chemical physics letters, 368, 594

    2003

  62. [62]

    Rayalacheruvu, P., Majumdar, L., Rocha, W. R. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.15358, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.15358

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15358 2025

  63. [63]

    Rocha, W. R. M., Rachid, M. G., Olsthoorn, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244032

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244032 2022

  64. [64]

    Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., Ressler, M. E., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348427

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348427 2024

  65. [65]

    Rocha, W. R. M., McClure, M. K., Sturm, J. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A288, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451505

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451505 2025

  66. [66]

    2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 398, 1049

    Schutte, W., & Khanna, R. 2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 398, 1049

    2003

  67. [67]

    D., Tobin, J

    Sheehan, P. D., Tobin, J. J., Looney, L. W., & Megeath, S. T. 2022, ApJ, 929, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac574d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac574d 2022

  68. [68]

    Slavicinska, K., Boogert, A. C. A., Tychoniec, L., et al. 2025a, A&A, 693, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451383

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451383

  69. [69]

    G., et al

    Slavicinska, K., Tychoniec, L., Navarro, M. G., et al. 2025b, ApJL, 986, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/addb45

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/addb45 2041

  70. [70]

    G., Rocha, W

    Slavicinska, K., Rachid, M. G., Rocha, W. R. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346996

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346996 2023

  71. [71]

    L., Dickinson, H

    Smith, Z. L., Dickinson, H. J., Fraser, H. J., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 883, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02511-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02511-z 2025

  72. [72]

    2003, Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications (Berlin: Springer), doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05088-0

    Soille, P. 2003, Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications (Berlin: Springer), doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05088-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05088-0 2003

  73. [73]

    Soker, N., Bublitz, J., & Kastner, J. H. 2022, ApJ, 928, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5827

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5827 2022

  74. [74]

    A., Gerakines, P

    Sonnentrucker, P., Neufeld, D. A., Gerakines, P. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 361, doi: 10.1086/523790

    work page doi:10.1086/523790 2008

  75. [75]

    Storey, J. W. V., Watson, D. M., & Townes, C. H. 1981, ApJL, 244, L27, doi: 10.1086/183472

    work page doi:10.1086/183472 1981

  76. [76]

    2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 530, A96

    Theule, P., Duvernay, F., Ilmane, A., et al. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 530, A96

    2011

  77. [77]

    CORINOS V: Radiative transfer effects in protostellar ice observations

    Thompson, W. E., Bergner, J. B., Evans, II, N. J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.27133, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.27133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27133 2026

  78. [78]

    J., Megeath, S

    Tobin, J. J., Megeath, S. T., van’t Hoff, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab498f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab498f 2019

  79. [79]

    J., Sheehan, P

    Tobin, J. J., Sheehan, P. D., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6f64

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6f64 2020

  80. [80]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 983, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb71f van Dishoeck, E

    Tyagi, H., Manoj, P., Narang, M., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 983, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb71f van Dishoeck, E. F., Tychoniec, L., Rocha, W. R. M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A361, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554444 van Gelder, M. L., Ressler, M. E., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348118

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb71f 2025

Showing first 80 references.