Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.17814 v1 pith:2XHOJF6M submitted 2025-02-25 stat.ML cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords llmsadvancesareasdecision-makingdeeperlanguagelargemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI), exhibiting remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks such as text generation, reasoning, and decision-making. While their success has primarily been driven by advances in computational power and deep learning architectures, emerging problems -- in areas such as uncertainty quantification, decision-making, causal inference, and distribution shift -- require a deeper engagement with the field of statistics. This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs, particularly those that aim to engender trustworthiness and transparency for human users. Thus, we focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation. We also consider possible roles for LLMs in statistical analysis. By bridging AI and statistics, we aim to foster a deeper collaboration that advances both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of LLMs, ultimately shaping their role in addressing complex societal challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accelerating RLHF Training with Reward Variance Increase

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new reward reshaping method provably increases reward variance for GRPO-based RLHF training, with an O(n log n) global optimization algorithm and preliminary speedups in experiments.

  2. Fundamental Limits of Game-Theoretic LLM Alignment: Smith Consistency and Preference Matching

    cs.GT 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For game-theoretic LLM alignment, Condorcet and Smith consistency hold for broad payoff classes, but preference matching is impossible for smooth, learnable payoff mappings.

Pith tools